https://www.bitchute.com/video/D93woB7i0EkU/?fbclid=IwAR3-D0NKaZ8KVPZeH0-10R03HamfEqv3hhTUcz4vvIb4MC2TBvUy8M8w1vQ
A Black Florida educator finds out that even suggesting that the holocaust story can e questioned means efforts by the holocaust lobby to inflict poverty and economic ruin on him.
Songs & Satire from English Political Prisoner, Alison Chabloz — Canadian Tour
Political prisoner Alison Chabloz singing her songs on a tour in Canada and talking about her life. In pathetic minority-ruled England, they jail singers, especially satirists.
Interestingly, for Jewish “comics” different rules apply.
Larry David pisses on a picture of Jesus… you’re welcomed to laugh.
Sarah Silverstein says she’d kill Jesus again if he had the chance… again, welcomed to laugh
|
RCMP were called in as tensions rose outside a controversial event at the University of British Columbia Wednesday night.
The event organized by student-led group Students for Freedom of Expression invited two controversial speakers to attend. One of them was Mark Hecht, who wrote a highly-criticized anti-immigrant op-ed for the Vancouver Sun last month.
The other speaker was Ricardo Duchesne, who has been critical of multiculturalism and Canada’s immigration policies.
But the event was met by dozens of protesters, upset over the university’s decision to give a platform to what they say is far-right hate speech.
“We did get a call from campus security that some of the people demonstrating and protesting were banging on the windows,” said Const. Kevin Ray with UBC RCMP. “There was some pushing and shoving.”
He says campus security called police when things began to escalate.
Justice Centre@JCCFCanadaTweeting from the UBC Students for Freedom of Expression’s event entitled Academic Freedom to Discuss Immigration featuring Drs. Duchesne and Hecht.
Protesters outside are pushing, blocking, & shoving attendees. Only way to enter is to be shoved in with help from security.
“When everyone went inside, security thought it was possible that they would smash the windows with their banging,” said Nicholas Kosovic, founder of the group who organized the event. “Some of the attendees were frightened.”
According to the group, about 80 people attended the event.
In an email to CBC News, vice-president of academic Andrew Szeri confirmed RCMP had to get involved due to safety and security concerns.
In a statement released last month, the university defended its decision to go ahead with the event.
“Discussion and debate cannot occur without the free and lawful expression of ideas, even those we may fundamentally disagree with, find distasteful or even repugnant,” read the statement.
RCMP say no one was hurt and no arrests were made. Approximately 10 officers responded to the call and had to stay in place until the event was over, Ray added.
CBC News has reached out to Students Against Bigotry, the group that organized the protest outside the event.
Friends, Donors, and Interested Persons,
Still no word from Judge Blake in my case. If this goes on much longer, I may file a pleading to try to trigger a decision, although that is a problematic step.
You may recall that in my last update on September 6 I reviewed the status of several recent cases brought against the SPLC. Since that update, there’s been a decision in the Center for Immigration Studies case in federal court in the District of Columbia — an unfavorable decision, as Judge Jackson granted the SPLC’s motion to dismiss. My claims differ in important respects from the claims CIS alleged in its case, so I am not dismayed or particularly surprised by the decision.
There has also been a decision in the James Kennedy Ministries v. SPLC and Amazon case in the federal court in Alabama, a case I’ve been following but didn’t mention in my last update. Here too, after 12 months, Judge Thompson granted the SPLC’s and Amazon’s motion to dismiss. The opinion is 141 pages, which may partly explain why it took so long to issue. Here again, the plaintiff’s claims differ from mine in important respects and I am not surprised by the decision
But when I say I’m not surprised by the CIS and James Kennedy Ministries decisions, I don’t mean I approve of them. To the contrary, I commend the plaintiffs for fighting back against the SPLC’s odious hard-left censorship tactics. The courts in those cases, so focused on the niceties of legal doctrines and so insensitive to the real world consequences of the SPLC’s malicious conduct, lost sight of the forest for the trees in granting the motions to dismiss. Some day, some court will have the vision and courage to put the SPLC in its place.
I’d like you to know I’ve not been idle in the cause of free expression as we’ve awaited a decision. For example, on October 8, 2019, on behalf of the Free Expression Foundation, Inc. I and a colleague filed an amicus curiae (Friend of the Court) brief in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the constitutionality of the Anti-Riot Act under which three young members of the Rise Above Movement had been sentenced to several years in prison for their involvement in the scuffles that arose at the Charlottesville rallies in August 2017. (The RAM defendants had nothing to do with James Fields’ driving of his car into the crowd at Charlottesville). I have attached my amicus brief below. The Anti-Riot Act, which the government had rarely used in 50 years, is flagrantly unconstitutional in that it gives the government prosecutors unbridled discretion to pick and choose on political grounds among participants in tumultuous demonstrations — as happened in Charlottesville and elsewhere, where no Antifa have ever been prosecuted even though so many of them have committed violent acts. I and my colleague also filed an amicus brief in a separate prosecution of RAM members in California. In that case Judge Carney, agreeing that the Anti-Riot Act is unconstitutional, struck it down. Judge Carney’s opinion is also attached below. These are important developments for the cause of free expression, but the mainstream media, predictably, has ignored them.
As always, I am grateful for your past moral and financial support and respectfully ask for your continued support. Here is my website for donation purposes: https://breathing-space-for-dissent.com/
My best to you all!
Glen
https://www.bitchute.com/video/tHgvIt17T4y6/
For years, we have discussed the unrelenting attacks on free speech in Europe with the expansion of hate speech laws and the general criminalization of speech, including international speech crimes.
Some in the United States would like to follow down that dangerous path (and universities are reinforcing the view of the need to regulate speech). The implications of such anti-speech policies are evident in Germany where a survey, conducted by the Institut für Demoskopie Allensbach(and published in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung) found that only 18 percent of Germans feel free to express their views in public. It is the most vivid example of how Europeans are learning to live without free speech. Undeterred, Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer, the successor to Angela Merkel, is now calling on greater limits on free speech during election periods — a concept that would normally be viewed as counterintuitive outside of the new European model.
Notably, over 31 percent of Germans did not even feel free expressing themselves in private among friends. Just 17 percent felt free to express themselves on the Internet and 35 percent said that freedom to speech is confined to the smallest of private circles.
dailyarchives.org
Even at the height of the Stasi, citizens were not nearly as controlled in East Germany. It is the irony of our times. It has been otherwise liberal governments that have succeeded with authoritarian regimes failed in getting people to give up their free speech rights. All in the name of fighting intolerance . . . by codifying intolerance to an ever-expanding range of speech.
Over the course of the last 50 years, the French, English and Germans have waged an open war on free speech by criminalizing speech deemed insulting, harassing or intimidating. We have previously discussed the alarming rollback on free speech rights in the West, (here and here and here and here and here and here and here) and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here and here). There are encroachments appearing in the United States, particularly on college campuses. Notably, the media celebrated the speech of French President Emmanuel Macron before Congress where he called on the United States to follow the model of Europe on hate speech
Antifa Smashing Camera at “Zombie” Youth Climate Strike
I’ve had a dramatic week which got recorded and is on the videos below. My camera got smashed at the Youth Climate Strike on Sept.27th. Three Antifa attacked me. They man in black mask threw it over the Cambie Bridge and it got smashed. — Brian Ruhe
Many people have expressed their concern for my safety so I have listened. My $350 video camera with memory card was destroyed which I need to replace soon. Please donate as I am succeeding in waking a lot of people up. A few of months ago I was getting 1000 views a day but now it is 2000 a day so the mission is going well. Below is an easy link to donate online.
https://gogetfunding.com/
[Candidates for mainstream Canadian political parities must be cyphers, never having said anything critical of privileged groups like Moslems or the LGBTQ censorship crowd. A cowardly Andrew Scheer hopped to it and, when openly homosexual and convicted shoplifter NDPer Svend Robinson commanded, he meekly obeyed and dropped candidate Heather Leung who has some private views on homosexuality. She believes in conversion therapy, feels homosexuality is perverted [there’s backup for that in the Bible] and believes some homosexuals recruit children. Wouldn’t it be better to have candidates that actually believe in something rather than programmable parrots ready to squawk out whatever the party leader decides is the party line?]
The party says it made the decision after learning about historical comments by Leung.
The Conservative Party of Canada has dropped Heather Leung as their candidate in the Burnaby North—Seymour riding, after video interviews surfaced in which she made homophobic comments.
In a video that appears to be from 2016, Leung said conversion therapy provides hope to those living “the perverted homosexual lifestyle.”
In a 2011 “Heather Leung is no longer representing the Conservative Party of Canada in the riding of Burnaby North—Seymour,” the party said in a news release. “Recent media reports have brought to light offensive comments made by Ms. Leung saying ‘homosexuals recruit’ children, and describing the sexual orientation of the LGBTQ community as ‘perverted.’”
Leung has not responded to a request for comment.
Conservative spokesperson Rudy Hesny said the decision came after the party had time to review Leung’s comments.
Hesny said the Conservatives intend to send a letter to Elections Canada informing the agency that Leung no longer represents the party, but that it may be too late to have her party affiliation removed from the ballots, which may have already been printed.
Earlier on Friday, Robinson, the NDP candidate in the riding, challenged Scheer to denounce Leung, strip her of the candidacy and take away her party membership after the video interviews resurfaced earlier this week.
Robinson became Canada’s first openly gay MP in 1988, which resulted in death threats and the trashing of his constituency office. Through the 1980s and 1990s, he introduced at least five different private member’s bills aimed at amending Canadian laws to include same-sex marriage.
He said statements like Leung’s are hateful and hurtful, especially to vulnerable youth who are struggling with their identity.
Scheer’s decision Friday echoes that of his predecessor, Stephen Harper, who set the precedent during the 2015 election when he stripped membership from an Ontario candidate who called homosexuality “unnatural,” but it also serves to push back against critics who have called the Conservative leader anti-gay.
Scheer has refused during the campaign to say whether his views have changed since 2005 when he opposed same-sex marriage.
He has promised, however, to protect LGBTQ rights.
“There is no tolerance in the Conservative Party for those types of offensive comments,” the Conservatives said.
Hesny said that the party’s decision Friday reflected Scheer’s vision for Canada, laid out in a keynote speech delivered last May.
“I find the notion that one’s race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation would make anyone in any way superior or inferior to anybody else absolutely repugnant,” Scheer said then. “And if there’s anyone who disagrees with that, there’s the door. You are not welcome here.”
