Dedicated to Free Speech, Immigration Reform, and Restoring Political Sanity


Canada Day is not a celebration of Canada, but a celebration of rootless cosmopolitanism and the destruction of our heritage.

Canada Day is not a celebration of Canada, but a celebration of rootless cosmopolitanism and the destruction of our heritage
It is a scene duplicated across Canada. The weather is sunny and hot, and the expansive field is dense with people clapping, cheering and singing to the performers on stage.   Giant speakers broadcast music at ear-splitting decibels. The music originally emanated from other continents and other nations : Reggae, rap, Andean, rock and roll—you name it.
Actually, Canada Day is a misnomer . It’s more like Dis-United Nations Day. We are encouraged to celebrate every culture but our own because, well, we don’t have a culture, do we? Or so we are told by Trudeau. Yet at the same time we are told that diversity is our culture. That is, if we have a culture, it is just a mosaic of imported cultures. Apart from artistic aboriginal presentations, Canada Day is largely the expression of differences not of our own making. Differences which allegedly unite us. Right?
Not so fast ! The official narrative that there is ‘unity in diversity’ has been contradicted by a myriad of studies kick-started by Harvard’s Robert Putnam whose foundational study appeared nearly two decades ago. The consensus of the studies is that “diversity” diminishes civic trust and participation, a consequence that among other things, makes electors less willing to vote for redistributive policies. People are hesitant to share their wealth with people who are very much unlike themselves. The welfare state was originally constructed by ethnically homogeneous societies, but in a multi-ethnic environment, this project is rendered more difficult. The late Nobel Peace Prize winning economist Milton Friedman once maintained that a nation can have mass immigration or a welfare state, but not both. By the same token, a good case can also be made that, ultimately, multi-ethnic fragmentation and the welfare state are mutually exclusive.
Moreover, there is a clear trend among large cities in Europe and North American of voluntary re-segregation. Ethnic minorities are voluntarily clustering in urban pockets– a conspicuous corroboration of Putnam’s observation that people of all ethnicities prefer to, in his words, “bowl alone” and “hunker down”. Determined efforts to “integrate” fail because they run counter to human nature. As moral psychologist Jonathan Haidt noted, we evolved as a species of tribes, “… tribalism allowed us to create large societies and to come together in order to compete with others. That brought us out of the jungle and out of small groups.” At some level, then, tribalism is baked into most people’s mental wiring . According to Haidt, “This is just a basic aspect of human social cognition.”
Successful integration is conditional on modest immigration levels. But in a nation with the highest or second highest per capita immigration intake in the world, integration seems less likely, particularly when 90% of immigrants are drawn from “non traditional sources”, and half of the population of the cites that receive them are themselves foreign-born residents. At this rate of demographic change, mass immigration and multiculturalism become a combustible mix. The notion that “e pluribus unum” will be the end result of this transformation is both fanciful and intellectually dishonest.
The irony is that while the core culture of host countries is being eviscerated in the name of diversity, global mass migration on an epic scale has done much to homogenize global culture. The diversity of sovereign nations is giving way to a borderless world of sameness. For some this is a blessing, but for others it is a nightmare, and the gap between them is widening. It is a schism that has overshadowed the traditional Left/Right polarity—-the “Great Divide” as Australian academic Katherine Betts termed it twenty years ago– is no longer about Left vs. Right but about globalists vs. nationalists. For Betts the battle was between the “New Class”, a coalition of the intelligentsia, mainstream media and the growth lobby, and the subordinate class of ordinary people who have little say in the construction of immigration policy.
Other analysts have tendered similar characterizations. Psychologist Jonathan Haidt describes the division as one between those who feel ‘rooted’ in their town, community and nation and those, on the other hand, who are less parochial and more averse to nation states and borders. I prefer British writer David Goodhart’s labels. As he portrays it, the new civil war pits the “Somewheres” against the “Anywheres”. The former are rooted, nationalist and traditional, and understandably resentful of being on the receiving end of an immigration policy designed to displace them and imposed without their input or consent. The latter¸ the Anywheres, are more ‘educated’, progressive and mobile, and are apt to look upon Somewheres as ignorant, stupid and nostalgic for a past that never was nor can be again. It is a kind of condescension which ordinary working people in the West have come to expect from those who claim to ‘know better’.
Sadly, the “Anywheres”, these pretentious self-proclaimed sophisticates who consider themselves ‘citizens of the world’, have commandeered the classrooms, editorial rooms, boardrooms and cabinet rooms of the nation. It is their vision of Canada, not ours, which has been thrust upon us. It is a vision that finds full expression in the manner in which “Canada” Day is celebrated and embraced by an entire generation of indoctrinated college graduates amply represented in the festivities. These ‘ Millenials’ know little of what Canada once was, or how it came to be, or that it was shaped by our two French and English founding peoples, their religion and values. They do not understand that a citizen of “anywhere” is a citizen of “no where”. The “anywheres” are really gypsies cut loose from the heritage and moral moorings of their ancestors who settled and built this exemplary nation.
Canada Day is not a celebration of Canada, but a celebration of rootless cosmopolitanism and the destruction of our heritage.
Tim Murray
June 29, 2019

Monika Schaefer Gets Some Books Back from Customs Censors Thieves, Some Must Be Appealed

Monika Schaefer Gets Some Books Back from Customs Censors Thieves, Some Must Be Appealed 

CBSA Notice of Determination: Some Books Good, Some Books Bad

Two of the five books seized from me at the Calgary airport back in April have been returned to me, along with a Notice of Determination. What follows is my letter of appeal.

2019 June 26

Prohibited Importations Unit
Canada Border Services Agency
c/o CBSA Mail Processing Unit
2215 Gladwin Crescent, Entrance C
Ottawa Ontario, K1A 0L8

RE: Seizure of personal books at Calgary YYC Airport on 2019/04/24
This is my SECOND written correspondence.

Regional control No. 2019-7011-K19-0001; PIU No. 2019-0041

I have received two of the five stolen books back, thank you very much. A Notice of Determination was sent with the books, as well as a copy of the Notice by mail. I am hereby appealing the Notice of Determination.

The returned books are:
⁃ Bungled: “Denying the Holocaust” by Germar Rudolf
⁃ Government by Deception by Jan Lamprecht

The books remaining in your (temporary) possession are:
⁃ The Commission by Richard Barrett
⁃ The Great Impersonation – The Mask of Edom by Pastor Eli James
⁃ Mystery Babylon: New World Unveiled Vol 1 by Eli James & Clay Douglas

I am asking, nay, telling you to send back the latter three books immediately. The seizure of those books constitutes theft. I did not consent and I do not consent to the theft of my books.

It is nobody else’s business which books I choose to read. I did not write these books. I wished to read them. They were my personal property. I did not have commercial quantities; they were single copies, not for sale. The attempt to control what I read or do not read constitutes thought control.

Singling me out at the airport in Calgary was an attempt at intimidation and pure harassment.

It is of great interest to me that the Notice of Determination has, as part of the generic form, a list which outlines exactly that which the “identifiable group” is guilty of. Why else would there be such a detailed and precise list? It proves the point, that there is such an “identifiable group” guilty of exactly those things!

The following is on the official classification (D9-1-15) form, with check boxes beside each item.


Alleging that an identifiable group:
▪ is to blame for serious economic or social problems
▪ manipulates media/trade/politics/government to the detriment of society
▪ is inferior/superior
▪ weakens or threatens society

Who is the judge of truth? Could it be that the very group which is implied by “identifiable group” is guilty of all those things, and that they have cleverly made it an offense to talk or write about it? Just a little food for thought for the servants of the system.

I insist that my books be sent to me without delay, at your expense. I also insist on receiving a copy of your entire report in this file.


Monika Schaefer


Whatcott so-called hate crime charge update, June 27, 2019

Postby Bill Whatcott » Thu Jun 27, 2019 1:54 pm

Christians praying for me minutes before I am taken into custody at the Calgary Police Station to be extradited to Ontario to face a so-called “hate crime” charge for ministering to and speaking out against the Toronto homosexual unGodly pride parade.

Dear Friends,

On Tuesday, June 25th I attended the Ontario Superior Court, before Justice McMahon, for another Judicial Pre-Trial hearing (JPT). This hearing was for the so-called “hate crime” charge related to my zombie Gospel stunt in the Toronto homosexual shame parade in June 2016. You can read about it here: … index.html

Tuesday’s JPT was to sort out legal representation. My pro-life lawyer friend Daniel Santoro is unable to continue with this case. Another lawyer has expressed an interest in taking the case on, provided I am able to qualify for Legal Aid. Ontario’s Legal Aid system is pretty much bankrupted as far as I can tell so the vast majority of cases are being refused, even when the applicants are indigent, but we will see what happens. The Go Get Funding campaigns helped with my previous lawyers, and helped my family make it the past year in Alberta, but as far as I can tell my friends are understandably exhausted on my cases and at least in Ontario I can work at something to support myself.

My new (potential) lawyer is clear a few hundred dollars from my friends is hardly worth an hour of his time and my case being as complex as it is will likely require hundreds of hours of work if it is to look like something resembling credible legal representation in Ontario’s convoluted, somewhat corrupt (in my view), inefficient, and ridiculously expensive, criminal justice system.

Ontario Legal Aid turned me down once already, but now that I am residing in the province and am working part time as a delivery driver ($17 hr, approx 12 hours a week) and as far as I can tell the only wealth I own is the imperishable kind that is attained in heaven; I think I should qualify. The new lawyer (who is not on record yet) thinks there is a chance I may qualify, so he put in an appeal to Legal Aid.

For those who wish to pray for me, you can lift this matter up in prayer.

My next court date is at the:
Ontario Superior Court, 361 University Ave, Toronto
09:30 am, Thursday, July 25th

Justice McMahon said my trial will go ahead January 6th, 2020, whether I have counsel or not.

As for the $55,000 BC Human Rights Tribunal judgment that I am facing for correctly gendering the BC NDP Vice President Mr. Oger and urging BC voters to not vote for him, that judgment is now under appeal.

In Christ’s Service
Bill Whatcott

“For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.”
Jesus Christ

French Nudists Threaten to ‘Bare All’ in Sizzling Public Pool Standoff With Burkini Bathers


French Nudists Threaten to ‘Bare All’ in Sizzling Public Pool Standoff With Burkini Bathers


Get short URL

Earlier, authorities in the French city of Grenoble shut down the city’s two municipal swimming pools amidst a sweltering heatwave gripping western Europe after several Muslim women were seen swimming there wearing burkinis in defiance of the garment’s ban.

French nudists have issued a threat to “bare all” in a stand-off with burkini-wearing bathers at public swimming pools in the French city of Grenoble, as temperatures of over 40 degrees Celsius hold a relentless grip on western Europe, reports The Telegraph.

The city residents have launched a “citizens’ secular, ecologist” Facebook group called “Everyone Naked”, as they summoned members to arrive at the pool naked and challenge the “burkini brigade”, deploring Green mayor Eric Piolle’s “worrying inaction”.

At least 231 protesters have expressed an intention to arrive naked, with 1,300 showing an interest.

Soaring temperatures in Grenoble had stoked already-flaring passions among local residents, as authorities had shut down the city’s two municipal swimming pools after Muslim women were seen swimming there wearing burkinis.

The burkini-clad women went to the pools twice at the initiative of Alliance Citoyenne, a civil rights NGO, to challenge a city ban on the full-body swimwear, which they claim is discriminatory.

For reasons of security and hygiene, the southeastern French city obliges women to wear one-piece close-fitting bathing costumes in swimming pools while men must wear Speedo-style swimsuits rather than shorts.

However, in a deliberate act of defiance, the group of Muslim women challenged the ban.

Initially, some 15 women managed to enter the pool on 17 May and even filmed themselves bathing, claiming they sought to “to defend freedom of religion”.

​Last Sunday, the ladies were fined €35 (£30) each for doing so.

Nonetheless, the women went on social media to call for a third such “operation burkini” this Sunday.

The burkini advocates say they decided to act after 630 people signed a petition asking for the rules to be changed so Muslim women could bathe in public baths.

​Adrien Roux, national head of the Citizen’s Alliance, deplored the fact that due to their religious beliefs, hundreds of Muslim women couldn’t go swimming.

The embattled city mayor has now called for the state to intervene to “remove all ambiguity on the status of body-covering swimming costumes”.

2016 witnessed several French municipalities banning the wearing of burkinis, claiming it was a security threat, only to have the bans later overturned by a court.

Tunisian women, one (R) wearing a burkini, a full-body swimsuit designed for Muslim women, swim on August 16, 2016 at Ghar El Melh beach near Bizerte, north-east of the capital Tunis.
Tunisian women, one (R) wearing a “burkini”, a full-body swimsuit designed for Muslim women, swim on August 16, 2016 at Ghar El Melh beach near Bizerte, north-east of the capital Tunis.

A modesty swimsuit for women, the burkini covers the whole body except the face, the hands and the feet, in a design intended to respect Islamic traditions of modest dress, but its acceptability is debated.

LGBTQ Rowdies Bite Pro-Gay Eisenberger in the Butt

LGBTQ Rowdies Bite Pro-Gay Eisenberger in the Butt


It looks good on Eisenberger. Last summer he spent $25,000 of our money painting rainbow crosswalks to celebrate this tiny minority of the weird. Here’s their thanks. Had I been elected Mayor of Hamilton, NO MORE CATERING TO THE LGBTQ agenda.…/hamiltons-mayor-angered-by-rude-wa…. It wasn’t the peaceful Yellow Vest protests he’s trying to ban that invaded his neighbourhood.

Free Speech Supporter Jeff Goodall Blasts Eisenberger’s Blindness

Free Speech Supporter Jeff Goodall Blasts Eisenberger’s Blindness
Re: “Hamilton’s mayor angered by rude ‘wake up’ from protesters at home’.
Looks good on him!
I have sent in a letter as follows:
Re “Hamilton’s mayor angered by rude ‘wake up’ from protesters at home” (Fatima Texiwala, June 28): I find Hamilton Mayor Fred Eisenberger’s anger over LGBTQ-leftist demonstrators marching on his front lawn and “banging on my door” rather amusing, bearing in mind he and Hamilton Council’s recent efforts to find legal ways to prevent the “Yellow Vests” from demonstrating on the City Square, as in the CBC report that “Hamilton’s city manager says she’ll report back on the legalities of allowing some groups and not others” (*). At least the Yellow Vests use public property to demonstrate on, not Eisenberger’s private property! Maybe he should consider where the real threats are coming from.
I doubt it will be published, but what the heck…
Jeff Goodall.
Free Speech Supporter

Harasser of White Nationalist Kevin Goudreau Turns Snowflake & Seeks Peace Bond Against His Victim

Harasser of White Nationalist Kevin Goudreau Turns Snowflake & Seeks Peace Bond Against His Victim
OTTAWA, June 25, 2019. Jews have a word for it — chutzpah — which is unmitigated gall.
Two weeks ago, longtime White nationalist Kevin Goudreau was served by Peterborough Police with a summons to appear in an Ottawa Court. It turned out that anti-free speech whirlwind Richard Warman was seeking a peace bond against Mr. Goudreau. It seems Mr. Warman feared for his life. He wanted Mr. Goudreau enjoined from communicating with Mr. Warman and other directors named and unnamed of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network of which Mr. Warman is a director. In addition, Mr. Goudreau is not to come within 200 yards of any event sponsored by the Canadian Anti-Hate Network, give up any weapons he might have, and not consume alcohol. Breach of this bond could land Mr. Goudreau in prison.
Now Mr. Goudreau has never communicated, either by e-mail post or phone call, with Richard Warman. In fact, until this morning, he had never even seen him.
The story gets more amazing. In an affidavit supporting his application for a peace bond, Warman revealed that he had been contacting two different police — Durham Region and Peterborough — four times since 2008 seeking to get Mr. Goudreau charged for his Internet writings. Four times the police investigated and found no cause for charges. A very miffed Richard Warman concluded: “:I have lost all faith in the police to lay criminal charges” against Mr. Goudreau. Mr. Goudreau knew nothing about these machinations behind his back.
So, for years, Mr. Warman has laboured mightily to have Mr. Goudreau charged and jailed. Now, he pretends to fear the fellow he has tormented behind his back.
In the glory days of Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (Internet censorship), Warman filed nearly 30 complaints. He boasts, in his affidavit, ” I have successfully brought 16 human rights complaints against online hate … resulting in permanent cease and desist orders.” Also, many of the victims were fined and two — Terry Tremaine and Thomas Winnicki — ended up spending time in prison because of Mr. Warman’s actions. More recently in attacking anti-Cultural Marxist satirical publication YOUR WARD NEWS, Warman, who lives in Ottawa, contacted Child Protective Services in Toronto, according to testimony at a recent trial, to try to get editor Dr. Sears son taken away. [An investigation found that Dr. Sears and his wife were loving parents.]
paul and kevin goudreau.jpg
Anti-racist attack dogs tend to be drama queens. During some of the Warman-instigated Sec. 13 hearings, there were as many as five government paid security people to protect Mr. Warman and the commission lawyer. Another professional anti-racist, Warren Kinsella claimed back in 1994, when he was promoting his flawed book Web of Hate: Inside Canada’s Far Right Network, that he and his then wife checked into hotels under assumed names for fear of hitmen sent by Libyan leader Muammar Ghaddafi or “neo-Nazi”
 skinheads whom he’d smeared. That was supposed to inspire awe and sympathy. That was 25 years ago and a graying and paunchy Kinsella is still running his mouth and smearing dissent on sympathetic media.
Today was a rainy day in Ottawa. The Canadian Association for Free Expression had obtained legal advice for Mr. Goudreau. CAFE Director Paul Fromm accompanied Mr. Goudreau. Mr. Goudreau sought unsuccessfully to have the case moved to his home town of Peterborough. This was turned down. Although both sides were ready to go, the hearing was adjourned to August 12.

Hear William Johnson, Paul Fromm & Kenn Gividen on the ETHNOSTATE – Featuring Richard Warman’s Vendetta Against Activist Kevin Goudreau

 Hear William Johnson, Paul Fromm & Kenn Gividen on the ETHNOSTATE – Featuring Richard Warman’s Vendetta Against Activist Kevin Goudreau
paul and kevin goudreau.jpg
Paul Fromm, Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression with Richard Warman Victim Kevin Goudreau outside Ottawa Court, June 25, 2019

* Canadian free speech haters target WN activist
* William Johnson speculates on what drives free speech haters like Richard Warman
* Self hating Whites pose a threat to racial health

Notice: ob_end_flush(): Failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home/public/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5373