We are thrilled to announce that two New Brunswick pastors have defeated a government motion to put them into contempt of court for holding church services in a commercial tent during COVID-19 lockdowns that banned indoor public gatherings.
In the fall of 2021, Pastors Phillip Hutchings and Cody Butler were bound by a court order requiring them to make “all reasonable efforts” to comply with mandatory health orders, including the order banning indoor public gatherings.
With your help, we retained Jonathan Martin to defend the pastors.
After hearing the legal argument from Martin, the court concluded that it could not “clearly and unequivocally” conclude that the commercial tent met the definition of a public indoor space as described in the mandatory order.
Nor could Chief Justice Tracey K. DeWare, who heard the contempt motion, conclude that the pastors knew they were breaching the mandatory health orders.
According to the Chief Justice, an “alternative and reasonable point of view can be that the Respondents moved their church services to the commercial tent in an attempt to avoid the restrictions on ‘public indoor space’ and therefore avoid breaching the Mandatory Order.”
As you may know, Phillip Hutchings and Cody Butler are no strangers to legal proceedings.
They previously persuaded the New Brunswick Court of Appeal that a contempt finding against them should be vacated for reasonable apprehension of bias.
More recently, charges of obstruction and disobeying health orders were dropped against the pastors in November 2022 after they filed a constitutional application challenging the legality of the health orders.
You can click here to read our official news release and a copy of the court decision.
Catholic School Suspends Teen For Stating God Created Two Genders And Protesting Against Transgender Students Using Girls’ Bathrooms
Western societies today, telling the truth regarding human biology can have detrimental consequences. A so-called Catholic School suspended a conservative Canadian teenager named Josh Alexander for the remainder of the school year because he refused to abandon his correct beliefs on gender and for standing up for girls uncomfortable with biological males in their restrooms.
No one should be surprised this happened in Canada, either. The country is led by a globalist authoritarian who has declared war on both people of faith and conservatives.
Alexander, 16, was first suspended back in November by St. Joseph’s Catholic High School in Renfrew, Ontario after organizing a demonstration against transgender students using girls’ restrooms. He said he launched the protest because two girls expressed their discomfort to him over biological males in their washrooms.
Alexander made clear to school officials he had no intention of starting conflicts with transgender students but simply wanted the freedom to express his views. The school, however, rendered their final judgment that Alexander’s mere attendance on school campus would damage the “well-being” of transgender students.
The school refused to consider the well-being of female students forced to share bathrooms with boys.
Josh Alexander, 16, is not allowed to attend school for the rest of the year after saying he would continue to express his belief that God created only two genders. The school told him his presence would be “detrimental to the physical and mental well-being” of transgender students, Alexander told The Epoch Times.
He told St. Joseph’s Catholic High School in Renfrew, Ontario, he would not intentionally engage or start conflicts with transgender students, but he would continue to express his belief. He and his lawyer are bringing this matter to an Ontario human rights tribunal, calling it religious discrimination.
“Offence is obviously defined by the offended. I expressed my religious beliefs in class and it spiraled out of control,” Alexander said. “Not everybody’s going to like that. That doesn’t make me a bully. It doesn’t mean I’m harassing anybody. They express their beliefs and I express mine. Mine obviously don’t fit the narrative.”
He hasn’t attended school since November, when he was first suspended. He had organized a protest against transgender students using the girls’ washrooms. Alexander said he launched the demonstration after two girls at his school confided in him that they were uncomfortable sharing bathrooms with biological males.
He had also said in class discussions that there are only two, immutable genders.
When his suspension was lifted the beginning of January, he was instead “excluded” by the principal, which has the same effect as suspension but is considered non-disciplinary. He was told this week that he will be excluded for the rest of the school year, and he’s not sure if that will end up extending into the next school year as well.
Alexander’s lawyer, James Kitchen, told The Epoch Times the school has characterized Alexander’s actions as “bullying.”
In the West there is no freedom for non-conformist researchers!
International Robert Faurisson Prize 2023 awarded to Germar Rudolf by Bis RepetitaThis content is also available inGerman and French Published: 2023-02-05
The city hall of Vichy had already successfully pressured the restaurant where the International Robert Faurisson Prize was to be awarded on January 25, 2020. After two years of interruption, not of the awarding of the Prize but of the meeting in the sub-prefecture of Allier because of the confinements and covidesque restrictions, was again organized on Wednesday January 25, 2023 a gathering, first on the tomb of professor Faurisson in the cemetery of Vichy, 17 rue des Bartins, then in a restaurant where, at the end of the lunch, took place the fifth handing-over of the Prize bearing the name of the late academic. However, even before this event took place, only a few hours before it was to be held, the mayor of Vichy, the LR Frédéric Aguilera, issued a decree to prohibit this gathering, and Madame le Préfet de l’Allier did the same, in the name of the State (but not of the French State of 1940!), all business as usual. “This gathering, which honors a person who minimized or contested the facts committed during the Occupation, in particular the persecution of the Jews, constitutes an attack on the respect of the human person and thus a disturbance of public order.”
Robert Faurisson’s Grave in Vichy
To peacefully gather at the tomb of a deceased person, on the occasion of the anniversary of his birth (Robert Faurisson was born on January 25, 1929 in Shepperton and died in Vichy on October 21, 2018), and then to give a Prize to a non-conformist researcher in a Vichy restaurant is considered an unspeakable act by their Judeo-Masonic Republic. This is where freedoms stand today in our unfortunate country. And indeed, when we arrived at the end of the morning at the Vichy cemetery, three police cars were waiting for us, two outside the cemetery, a third one circulating inside. Fortunately, as we arrived in dispersed order and in limited numbers, there was no crowd and we were able to pay our respects for a few minutes at the Professor’s tomb.
Although the cemetery is huge and has many alleys, the tombstone is easily recognizable because only one name is engraved, Robert, the patronymic name does not appear. Next to it, on the left, one can see the drawing of a ladybug. Robert Faurisson wanted it. He was indeed particularly fond of this insect whose specialty is to devour larvae. However, all his life, the intrepid professor was confronted with human cowardice. He knew many examples of it, experienced all its horror, hated the slimy, deceitful and cowardly side of many souls. Although he was very human and understanding of the faults and shortcomings of humanity, knowing how to be delightful, generous and faithful in friendship to all those for whom he had esteem, being welcoming and available to all those who came to see him, Faurisson abhorred cowardice, especially when those who displayed it dressed up as clever, proud and courageous men, putting themselves forward, swaggering, raising their heads, and not shying away from lecturing the others.
Robert Faurisson International Prize 2023 for Germar Rudolf
This year, for its fifth edition, the Robert Faurisson International Prize was awarded in Vichy to the German chemical engineer Germar Rudolf, for whom we owe an expert report on the “gas chambers of Auschwitz” and many other studies for which he was condemned in Germany and imprisoned for nearly three [recte four] years from 2006 [recte 2005] to 2009. Born in Limburg, Germany on October 29, 1964, Germar Rudolf studied chemistry at the University of Bonn from 1983 to 1989 and prepared a thesis at the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research in Stuttgart from 1990 to 1993. This is a highly qualified research institute founded in 1969 that focuses on the study of chemical and physical properties of solids. It is particularly interested in complex materials as well as in physics and chemistry at the nanoscale, and thus in electron and ion transport processes. In 1991, Germar Rudolf was approached by lawyers to prepare an expert report to be presented in a German court of law on whether the alleged use of gas for the mass murder of Jews during World War II at the Auschwitz concentration camp could be scientifically proven or disproven. The report, which was used in eight German and Swiss trials, was first published in 1993. A revised and expanded edition is currently available in German and English at www.HolocaustHandbooks.com. In addition, a more comprehensive book was published in 1994 [English as Dissecting the Holocaust, Vol. 1 of the Holocaust Handbooks], drawing on the expertise of engineers and architects. For his report, Germar Rudolf was sentenced by the German courts to 14 months in prison. During the trial, he was not allowed to prove that his conclusions were fair and reasonable. Trying to prove in a court of law the correctness, the soundness and the consistency of what one asserts in this field is forbidden, that is where justice stands today in the West!
Here are the persecutions suffered by this independent researcher. It is important to recall them in order to realize the gravity of the situation in what used to be called the free world as opposed to the communist world. Before he was ordered to be imprisoned, Germar Rudolf left Germany in early 1996 and went to England, all the more quickly because other of his scientific publications had been prosecuted in the meantime. In the United Kingdom, the indefatigable Rudolf founded a small publishing house called Castle Hill Publishers whose main purpose was to publish the results of his scientific research. Unfortunately, the British media and politicians finally discovered his activities and started a real manhunt against him in late 1999. Feeling trapped, Rudolf went to the Iranian embassy in London to ask for political asylum. But he was politely dismissed and asked to make an appointment. Therefore, in an act of desperation, he escaped to the United States where he applied for political asylum. While his case was being pursued, he redoubled his efforts to publish the results of his critical research on the Shoah. He launched an ambitious series called “Holocaust Handbooks” (www.HolocaustHandbooks.com).
WITHOUT A doubt, this work did not please the American authorities. In 2004, Rudolf married an American citizen. One year after this union, he had to apply to US immigration officials to have his marriage considered for permanent legal residence in the US. However, after recognizing his marriage as valid, he was arrested under the pretext that he had missed interviews at the immigration office earlier that year, interviews that in reality never existed. He was held for four weeks with a bracelet indicating “non-criminal” as the reason for his incarceration, which even the prison guards did not understand. How can a non-criminal be in prison?
At the end of those four weeks, after all the American courts had deliberately ignored this injustice, he was handcuffed and deported to Germany. There he was arrested directly at the airport, like a terrorist planting bombs, and thrown in jail to serve his 14-month prison sentence from 1996. And awaiting further trials for 21 books he had published while in England and then in the United States, although this publishing activity was and still is perfectly legal in both countries. He was finally indicted in Germany for 9 of the 21 books, including volumes 1-4, 7, 14 and 15 of the Holocaust Handbooks. During his trial, his lawyer was forbidden to say a single word. At the time, there was a very recent law that allowed German courts to muzzle lawyers who were deemed to be provocative during political trials. Rudolf and his lawyer were threatened with further prosecution if they filed a motion to present evidence that supported the historical claims for which he was on trial. Rudolf spoke at the trial for seven days in defense of freedom of expression, freedom of scientific research, and the obligation to resist without violence laws that violate the German constitution. Faced with the prospect of a trial that would last several years, due to his intention to present all the evidence cited in his books, with the risk of being prosecuted for that as well, the prosecution and the court agreed to a negotiation on the length of the sentence so that Rudolf was sentenced to “only” 30 months in prison. The original intention of the judges was to keep him in prison for more than five years!
DURING his incarceration in Germany, his application for asylum in the United States continued to be considered but was denied on the grounds that Rudolf was being prosecuted not for his political views but only for his scientific views. However, the United Nations Charter for Human Rights, which is the law that governs asylum applications across the Atlantic, does not expressly recognize scientific opinions as a valid reason for persecution. Therefore, he could not claim persecution. It was eventually determined, however, that the U.S. government’s refusal to grant him legal permanent resident status due to his marriage to a U.S. citizen was a violation of U.S. law. After his release from prison in 2009, he applied for an immigrant visa to reunite with his wife and daughter in the United States. But the U.S. immigration officials refused to adjudicate the case. He had to sue them for a decision, which was eventually positive.
He managed to immigrate to the United States in 2011. After being released from German prison in 2009, he immediately resettled in England and resumed publishing texts of historical dissidents. This continued after his return to his family in 2011. By the end of 2021, he had published 44 volumes of the Holocaust Handbooks in both English and German, in addition to many other books on a similar historical line. Six more volumes, up to volume 50, have been published since.
The persecution against Rudolf, however, never stopped. In 2019, his German passport that had just expired was not renewed. In addition, a U.S. police officer made false allegations about what Rudolf is alleged to have done. The United States denied his application to become a U.S. citizen. They have revoked [recte: intend to revoke] his legal residency status and want to send him back to Germany where he faces several decades in prison for each of his revisionist publications. Rudolf, 58 years old, decided to go into hiding before being imprisoned and deported. He is somewhere in the wilderness in the United States in a very precarious situation, really vulnerable. He asks the few countries that could grant him political asylum to write to his contact Lady Renouf in the UK. Her email address is … [Contact CODOH instead, if you want to help]
This is how activists and researchers who do not conform to the dominant ideology are treated in the West, even in countries where there is no anti-revisionist legislative arsenal. It is good to know this and to make it known.
In 2021, the school banned the bringing of paper valentines onto school property on the grounds that they were “non-essential materials” that could act as a vector for infectious disease. For this year, however, it was reasons of health and equity that inspired a similar order.
An Ontario elementary school has cancelled Valentine’s Day on the grounds that the traditional celebration of love could “negatively impact our families and students.”
“While we acknowledge the celebration of Valentine’s Day, and are mindful of the popularity of that day, it is not celebrated by all students/families in our community,” reads a notice sent to parents and subsequently forwarded to local media.
The note adds, “it is essential that all students feel welcomed and reflected at school, and that our celebrations do not negatively impact our families and students.”
The school in question is Jean Steckle Public School. Named for a prominent local nutritionist, it’s an elementary school in Kitchener, Ont., comprising roughly 750 students. In previous years, Valentine’s Day has been prominently featured on the Jean Steckle school calendar, and was typically observed with crafts, decorations and the exchange of cards. In 2015, the school even organized a Valentine’s Day dance for students in grades seven and eight.
In 2021, however, the school banned the bringing of paper valentines onto school property on the grounds that they were “non-essential materials” that could act as a vector for infectious disease. For this year, however, it was reasons of health and equity that inspired a similar order.
After several Kitchener parents approached local media to complain, a spokesperson with the Waterloo Region District School Board explained to CTV that Valentine’s Day imposes a “financial strain” on families who feel forced to “purchase cards or sweets.”
The spokesperson added that the holiday’s promotion of candy was “inconsistent with the Healthy Schools approach.”
Healthy Schools, as described on the Region of Waterloo’s official website, is a program to “decrease health inequities among the student population.”
This is far from the first time that the Waterloo Region District School Board has found itself in the midst of a culture war that has earned national — and even international — attention.
Last January, teacher Carolyn Burjoski was forcibly silenced at a board meeting and handed a “stay-at-home” order after she raised concerns about illustrated storybooks in school libraries that dismissed the medical side-effects of gender transitioning — or inferred that a lack of sexual thoughts may be a sign of an asexual gender identity.
“Maybe Rick (the protagonist in one book) doesn’t have sexual feelings yet because he is a child,” said Burjoski shortly before her microphone was cut off.
The same week that Jean Steckle cancelled Valentine’s Day, the board published a lengthy open letter inferring that a delegation of concerned parents to one of their recent meetings had been motivated by hate and transphobic bigotry.
Parents had objected to a student census that explicitly asked younger students about their ethnic background and sexual orientation, as well as a school policy of immediately accommodating a child’s wish for gender transition without informing guardians.
“Hate, racism and xenophobia are not ‘opinions’ that should be gathered through consultation,” read the letter. “The hallmark of a democratic public education system should be that we serve all students well, especially those with the least power.”
Last summer, the board censured one of its only Black trustees, Mike Ramsay, after he objected to lesson plans which encouraged Caucasian students to acknowledge their “white privilege.” “Most trustees see me as the wrong kind of Black man,” Ramsay wrote in an op-ed for the Waterloo Region Record.
Valentine’s Day — just like St. Patrick’s Day and Fête de la Saint-Jean-Baptiste — has its origins as a Catholic feast day, with Feb. 14 chosen to celebrate one of several Christian martyrs named Valentine.
Although there is no evidence that the Valentines had any strong feelings about love, the holiday is believed to have taken on that connotation in order to act as a toned-down substitute for the pagan holiday of Lupercalia, which featured rampant public nudity and even community orgies.
As Valentine’s Day has moved further and further away from its Christian origins, it has gained adoption in any number of non-Christian countries such as Bangladesh and Japan. Several notable exceptions can be found in the Islamic world, where observations of the holiday are banned for their alleged promotion of immorality and indecency.
St. Ann’s Catholic Church was one of two churches burnt down on June 26 on Similkameen First Nations territory. The over 100-year-old building was engulfed in flames early Saturday morning. Nearby Chopaka Catholic Church was also burnt down only an hour later. Police are investigating whether the two incidents are connected.
On June 26, Chopaka Catholic Church was burnt down after a suspected arson targeted the building. St. Ann’s Church which was nearby was also burnt down only less than an hour prior. RCMP are treating both fires as suspicious but have yet to determine whether they were connected. The church was located on Similkameen First Nations land.
Sacred Heart Mission Church was burnt down on Monday, June 28. The church, which was built in 1910, was the second to be engulfed in the south Okanagan on the same day. Nearly 40 minutes away, St. Gregory Mission Church near Osoyoos was also burnt down. Sacred Heart Mission Church was located on Penticton Indian Band lands.
St. Gregory Mission Church was one of two churches in the south Okanagan to have been destroyed by fire on June 28. The church, which is located on Osoyoos Indian Band land, was set on fire at 3:10 am on Monday. Investigators are continuing to look into the incident.
On July 3, arsonists attacked Our Lady of Peace Catholic Church with Molotov cocktails causing a fire. According to police, the suspects threw the incendiary devices through the church windows. Firefighters were able to put out the fire with minimal damage to the ƒbuilding.
On June 28, RCMP and fire officials responded to a fire at Siksika First Nation Catholic Church. Firefighters were able to extinguish the fire before any significant damage took hold. According to an initial investigation, the fire was believed to have been set deliberately.
St. Jean Baptiste Parish church in Morinville was engulfed in flames on Wednesday, June 30. Fire crews attended the building around 3:20 am but were unable to fully extinguish the flames. The church was totally lost as a result of the fire.
Our Lady of Mercy Catholic Church was completely destroyed following a fire that was deliberately set on Friday, July 9. An under-aged individual was arrested and charged with arson following the incident.
Yellowknife RCMP are investigating a suspicious fire lit at the Co-Cathedral of St. Patrick in Yellowknife on July 1. No injuries were reported and the building was slightly damaged. According to a statement from the diocese, the fire involved an incendiary device.
A former Polish Roman Catholic Church located on private property near Redberry Lake was burnt to the ground on July 8. A local resident had noticed smoke coming from the historic church’s general location and found the church to be engulfed in flames. Saskatchewan RCMP are investigating the incident.
On May 12, the 200-year-old St John’s Anglican Church was set on fire after somebody doused the building with gasoline. Local First Nations authorities believe the fire was set in response to recent residential school grave announcements.
Police with Six Nations of the Grand River are investigating a July 5 arson attempt. The suspect attempted to light the building on fire while residents were located inside on the lower level. The resident was able to extinguish the fire and claimed that he heard a car door slam shut before he came outside of the building. Following the arson attempt, residential school survivor Jessie Malcolm condemned the actions.
A suspicious fire broke out on June 30 on Sipekne’katik First Nations land at the Saint Kateri Tekakwitha church. According to investigators, threats targeting the church were circulating around the community before the fire was set. Firefighters were able to contain the flames but the fire managed to damage parts of the building before it was put out.
A fire broke out at Samson United Church in Maskwacis First Nations on June 19. The church is currently waiting on a final report on the fire. As a result of the blaze, the main floor experienced some interior damage and additionally, the basement was flooded.
According to Manitoba RCMP, someone reported a fire at Angus Bonner Memorial United Church at 2 a.m. on July 5. By the time police arrived, the abandoned church was already on fire. The building was totally destroyed and police are treating the fire as arson.
Early morning on July 19, firefighters responded to a fire at St. George Coptic Orthodox in Surrey around 3:30 am. The flames engulfed the entire structure and only a few charred pieces of the walls remained. Police are still investigating the fire.
Abbotsford Police Department is investigating a July 21 arson incident at Central Heights Church. A suspect described as 30-40 years old, male, dark-skinned and wearing a bright yellow rain jacket with a grey baseball hat is being sought by authorities.
On July 26, a suspect placed two containers of gasoline near St Mary’s Parish church and lit them on fire. The incident caused the side of the church to catch aflame. Police are still investigating the incident.
Camrose RCMP responded to a fire on Dec. 31, 2022 at the small parish St. Joseph Lutheran Church near the village of Hay Lakes. When first responders arrived the church was completely engulfed in flames. Police believe the fire is suspicious and are investigating it as an intentional act.
Your neighbours really need to see this… I can honestly say, this is likely the most important & impactful issue we have made so far. This is an extremely good one to distribute, jam packed with eye-opening information. Let’s get these into as many mailboxes as we can. February Special: For the entire month of February we are giving away a FREE Druthers Magazine for every Neighbourhood Mail order placed. These are offered on the website for $49 each, but we will mail one for FREE to everyone who places a Neighbourhood Mail order this month. (See the magazine here
Note: Some people and groups across Canada have been holding local fundraisers to have their neighbourhoods blanketed with Druthers papers. Maybe a thought to consider for expanding reach in your area.ORDER HERE
“I can’t change the direction of the wind, but I can adjust my sails to always reach my destination.”
More very important announcements will be made at this coming Saturday, February 4 rally at Stuart Park in Kelowna.
Petition to stop our Rallies
As most of you will be aware, the City of Kelowna has made an application to the BC Supreme Court for a declaration that our protests are prohibited, and that they can use the cops to evict us.
This application has not been heard yet and there is no Court Order. At this time, it is only a request for this relief.You cannot be charged for attending this protest on Sat. Feb. 4, nor can any other legal action be taken against you. It is directed primarily to David Lindsay and CLEAR.
Please Join Us on Feb. 4 and support Freedom!
Dominic from Prince George with updates from the North!!!
We need a truly independent inquiry – not some committee where the arbitrator is appointed and the terms and conditions set out by the Prime Dictator of Canada.
Here is the Petition:
Be a witness – do something!!!
Next delivery day: Feb. 5/23
Add your name to the delivery list and make sure to check your email on Sunday mornings for confirmation that our paper delivery will take place that day
Pick the time that works for you:
Make sure you arrive before the designated time so we can all get going ASAP!
Every Sunday at 11:30 am
OR 1:45 pm
Sign-up on the Newspaper Delivery list so that you get an email confirming the deliveries for each Sunday. With winter in mind, we will only do this if roads are bare and it’s not snowing. The advantage of delivering this time of year is that nobody is hanging out in their front yards except for the odd snowman.
We meet at the Capri parking lot between A&W and De Dutch Pannekoek House
Bring a large bag for carrying the papers if you want
Grab a free small Kelowna mapbook that can help you get situated. Your cell phone will be tracking and tracing you. Learn how to read maps again
You will be provided with a printed google map of the area you will be delivering to. Bring a yellow marker to indicate which streets you completed. You may run out of papers or you may end up with extra
We ask that with every paper you deliver, you remove the inserts and place them in the mailbox in front or behind the paper. That way, someone who may hastily throw out the paper will still be forced to see each individual flyer
Please deliver only one paper per mailbox, regardless if you have different papers (we usually have a combination of different papers and editions). Some houses may have up to 4 mailboxes; put one paper in each as they are for different tenants
3 Simple Things Freedom Activists can do to WIN this War:
Spread the Word by delivering papers and flyers everywhere:
Knowledge is power!
2. Replace your cell phone with a flip phone:
Think of your apps as TRAPS!
3. Use CASH:
Hand out the “Use cash cards” and “pay cash” business posters
Know Your Rights:
Guidelines for Peaceful Protesting/Gathering/Rallies and/or Attending Events (eg. Council Meetings, School Boards, Handing out Flyers)
New Credit Card Fees & Lack of Privacy
The dangers of digital gov’t ID and currencies are here… you need to use cash.
Withdraw money on Sunday from the bank machine, and then leave your money at home if you are scared to carry it with you, and just carry the amounts of cash for each day’s purchases for the week.
NO MORE CARDS!!!! NO EXCUSES!
USE CASH $$$$$$$$$
Contact Unity Health & Sciences Team to volunteer to distribute their professional brochures and Medical Doctor Packages throughout your home area, and to your medical doctor!
Not every doctor, analyst, and specialist is on the gov’t side and many have strong science and personal experiences opposing the gov’t narrative.
Even though COVID-19 restrictions are, for the most part, no longer in effect, other freedom issues have arisen as gov’ts use the cover of COVID-19 to introduce other more formidable liberty restrictions, including privacy violations.
Freedom is a multi-generational struggle – our legacy is to leave a better place for our children, not simply to quit after an issue appears to be over and anger diminishes; and of course, it rarely is truly over.
We urge you to provide designs (firstname.lastname@example.org) and/or your own signs for upcoming threats, including Digital ID
Digital currency and no cash
Climate change fraud
Further health, property, rights and freedoms restrictions
‘You are not going on your own and nor will you be on your own. You are and always will be in just the other room. We will follow you. We will join you after our fleeting mortality, which is only a passing thing for a purpose; that is all. You are not the first to return to the in-between life and you will not be the last. Here or there is an irrelevancy. We remain together as a link, the link that you made in a chain that mortality cannot break. The mortal loss is temporary, and togetherness is eternal. There is no such thing as finality, only transformation, which is to be welcomed as without it we cannot experience immortality.’ Michael Walsh.**************************
Thank you so much for letting us know. Rosie was always so kind to us and we look forward to seeing her when we’d come to Toronto. She made a huge contribution to the work for the German people and we loved her good humor and sharp grasp of the wretched political situation against us in both Canada and the U.S. We are sorry for your loss and for ours. We will miss her. Again, thank you for letting us know. Jim Rizoli and Diane King
The Story of Rosemarie (German Survivor)
Rosemarie, Her Mother and Sister Ingeburg in 1943 in Oberlungwitz
The League of Extraordinary Revisionists Presents GERMAN SURVIVORS OF ALLIED ATROCITIES, telling The German Story The German Way, a fascinating Interview and discussion with RosemarieRohrbach (as well as with 6 others TRUE Survivors) in Canada, in July 2016, by Diane King and Jim Rizoli.
The real Holocaust was suffered by the German People then and now. After the war’s end, the sinister GERMANY MUST PERISH dogma was savagely unleashed on the defeated former foe. It is estimated that 14 million Germans perished after the war’s end as a deliberate population control policy. No one, to my knowledge, has ever claimed this figure to be an exaggeration. The scars the Allied Atrocities left behind will never heal. We still have to endure it with every Hollywood Film produced that is repeating the never-ending lies.
In the introduction to the presentation, Diane explains that they give a voice to the German People who are not allowed to speak about their sufferings. Rosemarie says, ‘The details are just my explanations on what I have experienced and what my Mother had commented about the Hitler Years, ‘the best years of her life’ and that also was the truth. Originally all interviews done by Diane and Jim with German Survivors were freely available on youtube, they are banned now. (Contact us for our interviews now being uploaded to BITCHUTE
Everywhere we look in Western Civilization people are being forced to affirm the false doctrines of false religions and to bend their knees to idols. A couple of years ago, in the insanity that ensued after George Floyd died in police custody, the genuflection was even literal. Today there are several dogmas which if one does not uncritically accept them all, questions them, or argues against them one will find himself deplatformed, defenestrated, and the way things are going perhaps eventually decapitated. Here are a few such dogmas:
I. The world’s climate is changing, the change will be for the worse rather than the better, it is all man’s fault and to atone for his misdoing man needs to accept a radical transformation of society and economy that will greatly lower his standard of living, eliminate most if not all of his personal freedom, and drastically reduce the size of his population.
II. The traditional category of sex which divided people into male and female on the basis of biological differences is, despite its appearance of being essential to human reproduction, a false one, invented by those with power solely for the purpose of oppressing others. The proper category is gender, which is what you think or feel that you are. This may correspond to the sex you would have been assigned under the old system, or it may correspond to the other sex, or it may be something different altogether because it is all about you and your feelings and so there are in infinite number of possibilities. Nobody else is allowed to in any way challenge your self-chosen gender and if somebody calls you by the wrong pronouns or the name your parents gave you before you chose a new one to fit your gender identity that person has committed the worst crime in the history of the world and should be completely and utterly de-personed and removed from society forever.
III. Race is also a false category invented by white men to oppress all other people. When white people speak of race or otherwise employ this category they should be told that they are being racist and that race does not exist. They are not allowed to think of themselves as a race or a distinct group within mankind except if they think of themselves as distinctively evil which they are required to do. Other groups can speak of race and think of themselves as races and are encouraged to do so. White people aren’t allowed to call this racist and preach colour-blindness to these other groups. White people are supposed to practice colour-blindness, except when they are required to acknowledge their own wickedness and the virtuous racial self-awareness of other people.
IV. If a new viral respiratory disease is circulating, even if poses no significant danger to anyone outside the group that is most vulnerable to all respiratory disease, it is alright for governments to suspend everyone’s basic freedoms of movement, association, assembly and religion, order them into isolation, shut down their businesses, and basically act as if there were no constitutional limits on their powers, in an effort to curb the spread of the virus. It is alright for the government and the media to deceive the public and spread panic in order to get people to comply, but if anyone contradicts the official line that person is spreading dangerous “misinformation” and “disinformation” and needs to be silenced.
V. The way to prevent mass shootings and other gun crimes, overwhelmingly committed with guns that are not legally owned and registered but rather stolen or smuggled, is to pass more gun legislation and take guns away from people who are overwhelmingly law-abiding.
VI. The most important and valuable way in which the people who in the old dispensation were called women but whom in the new are called birthing persons and can be of any gender can contribute to society is not by bearing and raising children as mothers but by seeking self-fulfillment in careers outside the home. That many of them think and choose otherwise in no way contributes to the wage gap between what used to be erroneously called the sexes. The only acceptable ways of explaining this gap are patriarchy, male chauvinism, and sexism.
VII. When somebody commits a crime, unless it is a “hate” crime or the perpetrator happens to be white, Christian, male, cisgender, heterosexual or all of the above, it is not he who has failed society and owes society a debt the amount and manner of payment of which are to be determined by a court of law, but society that has failed him and owes it to him to rehabilitate him, no matter how long it takes, even if it takes the remainder of his natural life.
VIII. While tobacco and alcohol, which for centuries in the case of the former and from time immemorial in the case of the latter, have been comforts enjoyed by people from all walks and stations of life even those who have had little to nothing else beyond the essentials of subsistence, have to be driven out of polite society and cancelled because they can have harmful effects on people’s health, marijuana should be enjoyed by all and a “safe” supply of cocaine, heroin and other opiates, methamphetamine and other hard narcotics along with a place and paraphernalia to use to them should be supplied by the government.
IX. Masked thugs who go to lectures given by speakers with non-approved ideas and shout them down, disrupt the event, or intimidate its hosts into cancelling, and vandals who damage or destroy statues and monuments or who deface valuable art in order to make some sort of statement that nobody gets but themselves about the environment are all legitimately employing their “freedom of expression”, but if someone says something either in a lecture in person or online which disagrees with any of the tenets of the new progressive religion this is “hate speech” rather than “free speech” and he must be silenced. Anybody who attempts to prevent the thugs and vandals from exercising their “freedom of expression” is a terrorist and should be treated as such.
X. The primary purpose of schools should not be to teach children such basic skills as reading, writing, and mathematics, much less to teach them anything about history other than how many bad –isms and –phobias the leaders of their country were guilty of in the past. Rather the primary purpose of schools is to encourage children, as early as possible, to choose a gender identity other than what would be their sex in the old, obsolete, way of looking at things, to expose them to every conceivable form of sexual behaviour as early as possible, and to instill in them anti-white prejudice or self-loathing if they happen to be white, along with Christophobia, cisphobia, heterophobia and misandry. Teachers have a duty to do these things and should not be accountable to parents.
XI. “My body my choice” is only valid in reference to when a birthing person, vide supra VI, wants to terminate his/her pregnancy, even though doing so means terminating the life of his/her unborn child. The right of a birthing person to an abortion is absolute and not subject to limitations, unlike the rights of all people to life, liberty, and property. “My body my choice” is not valid when medical experts tell the government we all need to be injected with man-made substances that have never before been used and for which there are no long-term studies because they were rushed to market in under a year.
XII. Although the relative cost of commodities is determined by such factors as supply and demand – if there are a lot of apples and few bananas, this will make apples less expensive and bananas more so – this does not apply to the means of exchange, money. Therefore government can print and spend as much money as it wants, this will not cause the price of anything else to go up. If the prices of commodities such as food go up, this is because of greedy vendors, not the government. Indeed, it is because of all the greedy businessmen who would prefer that only a few people be able to afford to buy their products rather than many or all people that government needs to keep doling out money so that people can buy things. Although this does not cause the prices of things to go up, even if it did it would still be the right thing to do, despite the fact that rising commodity prices and devaluation of currency by the unit would harm the most the people that such government spending is supposed to be helping, those with the least purchasing power in society.
In Western Civilization, which is the name given in Modern times to what has become of what used be Christendom in the days since liberalism began to wax and Christianity began to wane there, these are the main tenets of the new religion that progressives have sought to establish in the place of Christianity. That this is a fair characterization is evident from the way those who raise valid questions about the first tenet are treated. If you point out that climate has constantly been changing throughout history, that human beings thrive better in warmer climates than colder, that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant but rather is to vegetable life what oxygen is to animal life, that despite irresponsible journalists’ efforts to portray every weather disaster that takes place as a “worst ever” moment recent decades have not experienced the most volatile weather on record nor have they been either the hottest or the coldest, and a host of other similar arguments you will likely be met with the accusation that you are a climate or a science “denier”. This very accusation demonstrates that to your accuser the idea of man-made, apocalyptic, climate change is not a hypothesis that begins with observations, is supported by evidence gathered through experiments and test, and rests upon such evidence while being open to being overthrown by other evidence, i.e., science, but an article of faith which we have a moral obligation to accept.
Now I am not opposed to articles of faith. On the contrary, I think that for communities of faith such as the Christian Church, these are essential. The articles discussed above, however, are not a statement of faith to which a community of faith akin to the Church asks its members to confess, but a set of beliefs to which progressives demand adherence from all members of every civil society in the West. This is not a new phenomenon. Progressivism began as an attack on Christian kings, the Christian Church, and the throne-altar alliance in Christendom and ever since the same progressives who scream “separation of Church and State” against the old order of Christendom have sought to wed the State anew to a different religion. In early sixteenth century England this was the heretical form of Calvinist Christianity known as Puritanism. Subsequent generations of progressives have pretended that their substitute religions were not religions at all but secular ideologies. Communism is one obvious example of this. The set of propositions that American liberals and neoconservatives claim define what it means to be an American, a citizen of the first country to have a separation of Church and State clause in its constitution, is another.
Now, while Americanism is in many respects less evil than Communism, the popular idea that the new false religion that we have been discussing is a rebranding and reworking of Communism is mistaken. Communism and Communists contributed to its development, for sure. Many of the dogmas of this new false religion were spreading through the academic world decades before they spilled out into popular culture, and the Marxists who outside the old Communist bloc had more influence in academe than anywhere else undoubtedly contributed to this. Nevertheless, the new false religion of woke progressivism is more accurately described as a reworking of Americanism than it is of Communism. It developed in the Western countries that aligned with the United States during the Cold War rather than in the former Communist bloc which has proven to be relatively immune to it. While acknowledging that Cold War agents of the Soviet Union and the Communist bloc had infiltrated the West and were working to undermine it from within – Joseph McCarthy was right about this – and that academic Marxists disappointed with the Soviet experiment and the failure of the World Wars to produce Marx’s general revolution had begun revising their ideology in a more cultural and social rather than economic direction as early as the 1930s, the development of the new false religion is more directly a consequence of a) post-World War II American policy with regards to the rebuilding of Europe that tied assistance in rebuilding to indoctrination in American liberalism with the aim of preventing a resurgence of fascism, b) the United States’ having become the leading power in Western Civilization at the very moment that American liberalism was beginning to transform itself into an unhealthy obsession with racial and sexual grievance politics, and c) the concurrent emergency of mass communications technology as a medium for the spread of news and culture, newly manufactured for mass consumption in the United States. Indeed, the central tenet of the universal propositional nationalism aspect of Americanism, i.e., that anyone anywhere in the world is potentially an American if he subscribes to the propositions that define America, is the seed from which the rotten plant of woke progressivism springs. Implicit within the notion is the idea that someone who was born in the United States, to American parents, whose ancestors going back to the American Revolution were all Americans, but who does not believe all the American propositions is not himself an American or at any rate is less of an American, than a new immigrant or even someone somewhere else in the world who does subscribe to all the propositions. All that is necessary for this to become woke progressivism is for the propositions to be changed from the classical liberal ones acceptable to “conservative” Americans to the sort of nonsense contained in the twelve articles enumerated at the beginning of this essay and for the emphasis to be shifted to the implicit idea (“you do not really belong if you do not agree that…”) rather than the explicit one (“you belong if you agree that…”). While some might point out that in many places in Europe as well as in the UK and here in Canada this new false religion of woke progressivism has seemingly gone further and become more powerful than in the United States this does not rebut the fact that it is essentially a reworked Americanism but speaks rather of the weakness and ineffectiveness of the resistance to woke progressivism. Note that here in the Dominion of Canada, the most aggressive promotion of woke progressivism in recent years has come from the currently governing Liberal Party and especially its present leadership. Ever since Confederation the Liberal Party has been the party that sought to make Canada more like the United States economically, culturally and politically. The weakness of the resistance to its aggressive promotion of woke progressivism can be partially attributed to the fact that the only party in Parliament other than the Lower Canadian separatists that is not a party that takes part of the Liberal platform and pushes it further and faster than the Liberals themselves do, the Conservatives, have in recent decades been controlled by neoconservatives who share to a large degree the Liberals’ masturbatory attitude towards America and are consequently Liberal lite. The Liberal Party is a textbook example illustrating the old maxim “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”. The woke Liberals such as the current Prime Minister are constantly preaching the virtues of “diversity” to us even as in the name of that “diversity” they seek to impose a stringent and narrow uniformity of thought upon us. As the great Canadian Tory historian W. L. Morton once observed, however, the ancient principle of allegiance to a reigning monarch upon which our Fathers of Confederation had wisely built our national unity already allowed for racial and ethnic diversity without the sort of pressure to conform that exists in an American-style compact society. An updated version of this observation could be that a monarchical allegiance society, allows for racial and ethnic diversity without imposing such as a dogma of faith that everyone is required to believe the way Liberal dogmatic multiculturalism does, and so the older principle allows for a greater diversity, or a more diverse sort of diversity that includes diversity of thought, than does the Liberal cult of diversity.
We have looked at several of the tenets of the false religion that woke progressives seek to make the new established faith of the West. We have also briefly looked at how this false religion evolved out of the earlier false religion of Americanism. The title of this essay, however, is “The Antidote to False Religion”. It is time that we turn our attention that.
The antidote to false religion is true religion. The True and Living God satisfies the longing for the divine in the human heart in a way that none of man’s inventions, made with his own hands, can do. The salvation man is in need of is spiritual salvation from sin, which has been given to us freely in Jesus Christ. The salvation through political activism, legislation, and regulation that progressivism seeks is a poor substitute. Unlike in the world of finance, where “bad money drives out good” as the law named for Sir Thomas Gresham states, in religion light drives out darkness, as it does in the literal sense. Consider the ancient world. St. Paul in the first chapter of his epistle to the Romans describes the darkness of moral depravity into which the nations of the world had descended by turning away from the Creator into idolatry. Much ancient discussion as witnessed in the writings of Herodotus and Aristotle focused on the question of happiness, how a man attains it, and how he can be rightly judged by others to have attained it. The answer was not to be found in the pagan religions and the writings of Plato and the tragedies of Euripides, testify to a growing dissatisfaction with gods who were merely more powerful human beings with all the moral failings of mortals and, indeed, often more. Calls had begun to arise for reforms of the pagan religion. Into this darkness, St. John attests, the Word, Who became flesh and dwelt among us, shone as the Light of Men, satisfying the hunger and thirst attested to in the writings of the philosophers in a way that paganism, no matter how reformed, never could. The darkness of today’s false religion was able to creep back in because over the course of the past several centuries, Western man was lured into once again putting his faith in the creations of his own hands, now called science and technology, through the promise of wealth and power. Initially, the new idols seemed to impressively deliver on their promises but now they are starting to fail as all such false gods eventually do. Man now stands at a crossroads. The Light of Jesus Christ is still there calling him back. Or he can plunge himself further into the darkness of the new false religion.
There is a difference between the false religion of today and the false religion(s) of the ancient world. Ancient paganism was pre-Christian, the idolatry in which men indulged before God sent His Only-Begotten Son into the world. Concerning this idolatry St. Paul, speaking to the philosophers at Mars Hill, said “And the times of this ignorance, God winked at; but now commandeth all men everywhere to repent”. The false religion of today is sometimes called post-Christian, that is to say, the idolatry into which men sink after they abandon the true faith of Jesus Christ. A more Scriptural term for this might be Anti-Christ.
It has often been said that someone who has turned his back on Christ is far harder to reach than someone who has not yet heard of Him for the first time. This seems to be true and the difficulty may be greater when it comes to nations and an entire civilization rather than just individuals. However this may be, the true religion has not changed and we must call those who have abandoned it back.
We started this essay by looking at several articles of the new false religion being dogmatically imposed upon us. Twelve of these were given and this number was chosen for a reason. Since the earliest centuries of Christianity, the true faith has been confessed in a statement we call the Creed from the Latin word for “believe”. There are two basic forms of the Creed, the Apostles’ and the Nicene. (1) Ancient tradition says that the twelve Apostles themselves composed the Creed, each contributing an article. Whether or not that is the case, the Creed consists of twelve articles, one for each of the Apostles. The Nicene Creed, or more accurately the Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed, composed and revised at the two first Ecumenical Councils of the fourth century, is the most universal form being accepted by all the ancient Churches. While this is a longer form of the Creed, it too contains twelve articles which mostly correspond to those of the Apostles’ (Article III of the Nicene Creed contains matter not found in the Apostles’, Article IV of the Nicene includes everything in both Articles III and IV of the Apostles’, the Descent into Hell is included with the Resurrection in the Apostles’ otherwise the Articles of the Nicene-Constantinopolitan are longer or fuller versions of the corresponding Articles in the Apostles’).
I intend, the Lord willing, to give each of these articles an essay-length exposition this year. The text of both forms of the Creed will be commented on, with the essays following the order of the Articles of the Apostles’ Creed, covering Article III of the Nicene Creed under Article II. I have not yet decided whether to do this over the next couple of months or whether to spread it over the year covering one Article a month. Either way, the purpose of the series will be to remind people of the true faith so as to call them back from the false one.
Here are the twelve Articles of the Apostles’ Creed:
I. I believe in God, the Father almighty, maker of heaven and earth;
II. And in Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord;
III. who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary,
IV. suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead, and buried.
V. He descended into hell. The third day he rose again from the dead.
VI. He ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father almighty.
VII. From thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead.
VIII. I believe in the Holy Ghost,
IX. the holy catholic Church, the communion of saints,
X. the forgiveness of sins,
XI. the resurrection of the body,
XII. and the life everlasting. Amen.
(1) The Athanasian Creed is not, properly speaking, a Creed, but is more like a commentary on the Apostles’ Creed. This can be seen in the fact that whereas the Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds are both in the first person, expressions of what I or we, believe, the Athanasian is in the third person, a declaration of what must be believed. — Gerry T. Neal
Large Southern Ontario Rally & Convoy Commemorate Truckers’ Freedom Convoy
About 300 people gathered on the bridge on Centennial Road over the Queen Elizabeth Way and in a surrounding parking lot to commemorate the day in 2022 that the Truckers’ Freedom Convoy reached Ottawa to protest the COVID mandates and other attacks on freedom. The enthusiasm and friendliness of the freedom fighters was amazing. The battle against the ongoing assault on freedoms — threats to free speech on the Internet, more loss of gun rights, and the threatened theft of the right to earn a living in agriculture, mining and oil and natural gas industries — is not over. There was a sea of “Fuck Trudeau” flags and banners.
This group was joined by a convoy of at least 100 vehicles from the Niagara Peninsula. The two groups merged and headed off to a Vaughan Mills north of Toronto.
Hamilton is generally known as a leftist stronghold. Yet, this past week Hamilton has seen several and loud and spirited protests outside the downtown hotel where the Trudeau cabinet was meeting. Cabinet ministers, surrounded by a phalanx of police, looked shaken as they passed through a vocal crowd of freedom fighters Tuesday night.