Revisionist Giant Dr. Fredrick Toben Dies at 76

Earlier today, we received this sad news.

“|Dear friends,

This is to let you know that Fredrick Töben passed away at about 6:00 am, German time, June 29. He died of a gallbladder complaint. He had been ill for two months. Fredrick´s birthday was on 2. June. He was born in 1944.  He was 76 years old. He will be cremated in  Sydney.

RIP Fredrick Gerald Töben, you tried your best but only God can win the fight against the enemies of God. “

Dr. Toben visited Canada several times and was sponsored as a speaker by the Canadian Association for Free Expression.

He founded the Adelaide Institute. He dedicated half his life to fighting the vitriol, lies and hatred against his German people.

The anti-free speech Australian Jewish lobby had him charged and jailed for his historical skepticism about the Hollywood version of World War II.

Canadian videographer Brian Ruhe comments: ” I just got the very sad news that Fredrick Toben died in Australia at age 76. He was a great revisionist of Holocaust history and went to jail for it. I did a few videos with Fredrick in 2017 and will re-release those. We e-mailed back and forth over the years and I was trying to get him back on. I am planning memorial videos with those who knew him.”

The Destruction of Stockwell Day

The Destruction of Stockwell Day

Be very clear: Canada is in the midst of an unthinking, hysterical cancel culture reminiscent of the insanity and destruction of Mao’s Red Guards. Active collaborators in this Cultural Marxist insanity are many  in businesses and government. There is a party line of approved victimhood from which no one may deviate. All that is missing is Mao’s Little Red Book. And let there be no doubt, no one, no one is safe.

From corporate director, corporate advisor and CBC commentator, former Alberta Treasurer and later Canadian Alliance Party Leader Stockwell Day, within 24 hours was out on the sidewalk — purged. Of course, no trial, no hearing, no due process.

“A former Conservative cabinet minister resigned from both the Telus board of directors and a business law firm after comments he made on TV about racism in Canada. Stockwell Day was on a CBC Power & Politics panel Tuesday discussing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s response to protests over the police killing of George Floyd, a black man in the U.S. Day said systemic racism was not an issue in Canada and compared people’s experiences of racism here to him being mocked for wearing glasses as a child.

Wednesday afternoon, Telus released a statement announcing it had accepted Day’s resignation from the board. ‘The views expressed by Mr. Day during yesterday’s broadcast of Power & Politics are not reflective of the values and beliefs of our organization,’ Telus said in a statement. Day had been on the board since 2011.” And what values would those be, pray tell. Making money? Clearly not defending free speech or diversity of opinion. Mr. Day, incidentally, was elected by Telus shareholders. He must have been put under intolerable pressure to resign.

“Soon after, Teresa Dufort, partner and CEO at McMillan LLP, released a statement saying the law firm had accepted Day’s resignation as a strategic adviser. ‘At McMillan LLP, we believe that systemic racism is real and that it can only be addressed when each of us — as individuals and organizations — commits to meaningful change,’ she said. ‘Yesterday, Stockwell Day made comments during a televised interview that run counter to this view.’” (Vancouver Sun, June 4, 2020) So, Stockwell Day, who was representing his own opinions, not McMillan or Telus, had deviated from the new party line of White Guilt. Does McMillan mean it too is actually racist? Is Teresa Dufort prepared to give up her position to some worthy Negro or Indian? But Stockwell must be punished.

Later, the CBC announced that Day had stepped down from his role as a commentator on Power & Politics,


When asked about systemic racism, here’s what the former Reform Party MP actually said: “We have to recognize that our system is not perfect in Canada. Yes, there’s a few idiot racists hanging around but Canada is not a racist country and most Canadians are not racist. And our system, that always needs to be improved, is not systemically racist. … Should I have gone through school and been mocked because I had glasses and was called four-eyes and because of the occupation of my parents?” Day asked. “Should I have been mocked for all that? No, of course not. But are Canadians largely and in majority racist? No, we are not.” (CBC, June 3, 2020) These comments were, of course, considered heresy. Straight White men are not allowed to feel pain or exclusion. Only privileged minorities are allowed this narrative.

A UBC exec “liked” conservative tweets, now he has apologized and resigned


A UBC exec “liked” conservative tweets, now he has apologized and resigned

UBC board of governors chair resigned because he liked some tweets featuring basic, mainstream Republican talking points.


I just finished writing a column the other night about Michael Korenberg, the University of British Columbia (UBC) board of governors chair who was subjected to an online mobbing after the UBC Students Against Bigotry, an Antifa-affiliated campus group, disapproved of some of the tweets that Korenberg “liked.”

The UBC Students Against Bigotry (whose entire mandate is to deplatform non-leftists and get them fired) combed through Korenberg’s Twitter “likes” and found that he liked tweets by mainstream conservative pundits such as Dinesh D’Souza, Ann Coulter and Charlie Kirk. He also liked tweets that wished Donald Trump a happy birthday, and that celebrated Antifa being designated a domestic terrorist group. Most unforgivably, one of the tweets Korenberg liked was critical of Black Lives Matter, which is a group you can apparently never criticize. 

Leftist media outlets and academics also joined forces to get Korenberg fired: an article in the Tyee called his social media likes “disturbing,” and UBC education professor Annette Henry opined that Korenberg’s likes reflected a “white supremacist capitalist [hetero]patriarchy” worldview, and “It’s unfortunate that we have people in such positions of authority at UBC.”

Henry couldn’t resist but add, “we still keep hiring white people where we have the opportunity not to.”

Another UBC professor Jennifer Berdahl told the UBC student newspaper that Korenberg should resign.

At the end of the column I had written, I said that I hoped Korenberg would stand up to the mob and that this debacle didn’t end in him issuing a grovelling apology and resignation letter. 

But I had to toss out that column, as Korenberg has now released his looming resignation letter. 

“Over the past two weeks some articles/statements that I ‘liked’ on Twitter supported regressive voices and took aim at thousands of brave individuals who are standing up against racism, discrimination and hatred,” he wrote in a statement posted on Twitter.

“I accept that in liking these social media posts, I damaged what I support and that I hurt people. I wholeheartedly apologize to them, particularly to the students, faculty and staff of UBC…I have stepped down because it is the right thing to do.” 

And that really is all he is resigning for, folks: because he liked some tweets featuring basic, mainstream Republican talking points.

Korenberg was showing signs, early on, that he was the “apologize and resign” type. He told PressProgress that he regrets liking the tweets, giving the weak excuse that he liked them late at night.

But for the rest of us, if we are ever targeted by a mob of leftist campus activists and media outlets for something so minuscule as liking conservative-minded tweets, I hope we can muster up some courage and not be the type to “apologize and resign.”

OCCUPIED TORONTO: Mayor surrenders public square to VIOLENT thugs

OCCUPIED TORONTO: Mayor surrenders public square to VIOLENT thugs

When I went there to do a news report, the protesters swarmed me and my cameraman — but City Hall’s own security told me I was the one who had to leave, not the squatters.In fact, City Hall ordered my own professional security to leave the premises. And worst of all, an actual Toronto police officer threatened to arrest me!
Click here to watch my full report — it’s truly shocking:

Welcome to John Tory’s Toronto, where actual criminals control the town square, and reporters are kicked out by police. Who could have guessed that turning Toronto into a “sanctuary city” would lead to such anarchy?

But I promise you, we will do our journalism even if Antifa thugs, City Hall security or even real police don’t want us to.

I need your help though. These days Antifa attacks me on sight — they know that police have been ordered not to stop them. So, I have to travel with several bodyguards to protect me, since the police won’t.
I’m literally the only journalist in Canada who has to do this. Antifa would never attack the CBC — that’s their official mouthpiece!

If you can help me cover the cost of my security, please got to — thanks.

Yours truly,

David Menzies

P.S. We’re not easily scared off. We went back to Toronto City Hall yesterday. This time we brought our whole team, including our lawyer and SEVEN security guards. But the protesters still became violent. Seven bodyguards is an absurd price to pay, but we paid it. If you can help, please visit

PP.S. If you prefer to use snail mail you can make cheques payable to “Rebel News” and send them to:

PO Box 61056 Eglinton/Dufferin RO
Toronto, ON, M6E 5B2

Ontario Legislature Smashes Free Speech & Thought, Gives Second Reading to Bill 168 & Makes Criticism of Jews Illegal & An Action to Be Fought

Jewish communist revolutionary, Lev Davidovich Bronstein (Trotsky) who launched the Red Terror

Ontario Legislature Smashes Free Speech & Thought,  Gives Second Reading to Bill 168 & Makes Criticism of Jews Illegal & An Action to Be Fought
If you’re nostalgic for the early days of communism’s reign of terror is Russia, move to Ontario and see such thought tyranny at work. Of course, there are not public executions, yet in Ontario. It’s still tyranny light. Early in the 1920s, the communist dictatorship in Russia enacted a law making “anti-semitism” a crime punishable by death. The regime had much to hide. Russian communism was largely created by Jewish radicals and the early elite of commissars was top heavy with Jews. Those were facts. To state them, though, was “anti-Semitism” and earned you a death sentence.

Sadly, the Progressive Conservative government of Doug Ford — don’t let the”conservative” in the name fool you — has adopted a self-serving Jewish definition of “anti-Semitism” that neatly makes almost any criticism of Jews “anti-semitic” and, therefore, something the Ontario government is dedicated to fighting.
Firstly, one may ask why a government should be fighting any ideology– anti-Semitism, flat earthism or anything else. The province is so deeply in debt that if should have a single penny to waste currying favour with a tiny minority
The Ford government just gave second reading to Bill 168 to fight “Anti-Semitism”. It’s scary awful. Firstly, the DEFINITION of Anti-Semitism they’re using is the one they used to screw  Dr. James Sears, editor, and Leroy St. Germaine, publisher of YOUR WARD NEWS, which they are fighting to overturn. It comes from the “International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance”. 
Here is what the bill says:

Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools,
the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the
overall context, include, but are not limited to:

1. Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in
the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.

2. Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical
allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such
as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish
conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other
societal institutions.

3. Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined
wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts
committed by non-Jews.

4. Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or
intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of
National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World
War II (the Holocaust).

5. Adopt the following non-legally binding working definition of
antisemitism:“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be
expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of
antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or
their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious

6. Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or
exaggerating the Holocaust.

7. Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the
alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own

8. Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by
claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.

9. Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or
demanded of any other democratic nation.

10. Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism
(e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel
or Israelis.

11. Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

12. Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state

As you can see, there is room here to persecute people for legitimate criticism
of Israel or Jews in general. Now, here is the legislation …


The Bill requires the Government of Ontario to be guided by the working
definition of antisemitism and the list of illustrative examples of it,
adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance plenary on May
26, 2016, when it interprets Acts, regulations and policies designed to
protect Ontarians from discrimination and hate amounting to antisemitism.

The Bill also amends the Legislation Act, 2006 to adopt that working

Bill 168 2019

An Act to combat antisemitism


Antisemitism is a multi-faceted problem that requires a multi-faceted
strategy, encompassing a range of ministries and agencies. For that
reason, it is desirable to require the Government of Ontario to implement
a whole-of-government approach in combating antisemitism. As part of that
approach, it is desirable to apply a consistent interpretation of Acts,
regulations and policies designed to protect Ontarians from discrimination
and hate amounting to antisemitism.

Therefore, Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the
Legislative Assembly of the Province of Ontario, enacts as follows:


1 In interpreting Acts, regulations and policies designed to protect
Ontarians from discrimination and hate amounting to antisemitism, the
Government of Ontario shall be guided by the working definition of
antisemitism and the list of illustrative examples of it adopted by the
International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance plenary on May 26, 2016.

Legislation Act, 2006 amendment

2 Section 87 of the Legislation Act, 2006 is amended by adding the
following definition:

“antisemitism” has the meaning set out in the working definition of
antisemitism and the list of illustrative examples of it adopted by the
International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance plenary on May 26, 2016;


3 This Act comes into force on the day it receives Royal Assent.

Short title

4 The short title of this Act is the Combating Antisemitism Act, 2019.

This definition means, that to avoid “anti-Semitism”, one must be prepared to lie and suppress or ignore facts.For instance, example 7 reads: “7. Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to thealleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.” Consider a spy and traitor like Jonathan Pollard who stole vital U.S. military secrets  and gave them to Israel. He was clear in claiming a higher loyalty to Israe; than to the U.S. Is noting this fact now to be deemed “anti-Semitic.” Why do politicians in the U.S. and Canada trip over themselves at election time to proclaim their undying support for Israel? The answer is simple: Many Jews, not all of course, are extremely loyal to Israel. That’s a fact.And another weirdness. “Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such … Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.” is an example of anti-Semitism.  There is no denying  Jews have ownership and participation wildly out of proportion to their numbers in the North American media. Must this no longer be discussable in Ontario?

FATAH: The death of journalism as we knew it

FATAH: The death of journalism as we knew it

Tarek Fatah

Published: June 10, 2020

Updated: June 11, 2020 8:32 AM EDT

Filed Under:

CBC journalist Wendy Mesley.File photo / Toronto Sun

Wendy Mesley was sacrificed on Tuesday at the altar of political correctness.

Her 40-year career as a stellar journalist with the CBC turned into ashes as she was first backstabbed by her colleagues at work and then offered by CBC management as a human sacrifice to vultures on a diet of cancel culture.

The CBC story on its website reported: “Wendy Mesley suspended from hosting after using ‘careless’ language in discussing racial issue.”

It left the clear impression that Mesley had uttered some racist remark on air. At no place did the story elaborate what the “careless” language was or that it was used in a staff meeting and that they were not Mesley’s words.

“It was not aimed at anyone, I was quoting a journalist we were intending to interview on a panel discussion about coverage of racial inequality,” Mesley said in an apology statement posted online.

The un-authored CBC story made no effort to clarify the ‘when’ and ‘where’ of the story.

Was Wendy Mesley the sacrificial lamb for other errors in CBC reporting and judgment that were documented at the original Canadaland story breaking the news about her?

Mesley’s apology was not to the person who ratted on her, but to all of Canada. She tweeted: “I hurt people and for that, I am very sorry. I am also deeply ashamed.”

No, Wendy, you did not hurt anyone. You quoted someone and only that person, and she or he alone is responsible for those words.

I can walk in the shoes of many activists who proclaim “Black Lives Matter”, as I have done since the days of the Canadian Black Action Defence Committee. I marched in the Million Man March, having lived as a child in a climate of anti-Black racism that is ubiquitous in the Indian subcontinent and the Arab World.

But none of that history justifies the depiction of Wendy Mesley as a racist.

Some may consider it an exaggeration, but the slow strangulation of what is permitted language in newspapers and broadcast networks across North America is the death of journalism as we knew it.

Political correctness, identity politics, cancel culture and “white guilt” have combined to make the exercise of ‘objectivity’, hitherto the essential device in a reporter’s toolbox, almost a swear word.

There was a time when opinion writing was reserved for those who had a decade or more of reporting in their pockets. No more.

Today, the phenomenon of ‘activist journalism’ has been born. Free from the supervision of an editor, these ‘journalists’ leap straight to ‘opinion writing,’ never ever going through the rigours of covering the courts, crime or natural disasters unless there was an ethnic or racial twist in the story.

Truth be damned. The pressure is on to bury the facts, lest it upset the sensibilities of guilt-ridden left-wing whites. Notwithstanding the casualties they cause, political correctness is the rule of the day for them.

The CBC incident rings the memory of Winston Churchill’s speech on March 5, 1946, in Fulton, Missouri. Free from political correctness and No. 10 Downing Street, Churchill bellowed: “From Stettin in the Baltic, to Trieste in the Adriatic, an ‘iron curtain’ has descended across the continent, allowing police governments to rule Eastern Europe.”

Today, from coast to coast to coast, another iron curtain has descended on Canada, allowing ethnic vote banks to taint our politics and cut off journalism from the principle of balance and objectivity, a situation that leads to a defenceless and voiceless Wendy Mesley.

Take it from this man of colour, Wendy: You are not a racist, you are a journalist par excellence.

Derek Sloan Defends J.K. Rowling from the Gender Thought Police

Derek Sloan: Conservative. No Apology.


The cancel culture mob came for the creator of Harry Potter this past week, but J.K. Rowling was ready.

In fact, she has set a perfect example of what to do when besieged by the Gender Ideology Thought Police for “wrongthink.”

It started when she tweeted the following:

‘People who menstruate.’ I’m sure there used to be a word for
those people. Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?

Rowling dared to lampoon a key tactic of the woke gender ideologists, that of replacing the accurate, biological term “women”, with clumsy, inaccurate, woke terminology: “people who menstruate”.

This language ultimately nullifies the existence of women, and those who use it do not take kindly to mockery.

What happened next? Well, they attempted to “cancel” Rowling. She was besieged with a torrent of denunciations, threats and abuse. She was accused of “transphobia” far and wide.

Rowling responded with a long and articulate essay which eloquently outlines her deep concerns about the threats that transgender activism and gender ideology pose to the safety of actual girls and women. I recommend you read it in its entirety here.

We’re all fortunate that J.K. Rowling is courageous enough to stand up to the mob, which is used to being able to silence anyone who won’t conform to their ideas. Rowling warns:

“Huge numbers of women are justifiably terrified by the trans activists; I know this because so many have got in touch with me to tell their stories. They’re afraid of doxing, of losing their jobs or their livelihoods, and of violence.”

Rowling knows, like I do, that eradicating the reality of biological sex and the differences between men and women will only create danger for women and girls:

“When you throw open the doors of bathrooms and changing rooms to any man who believes or feels he’s a woman…then you open the door to any and all men who wish to come inside. That is the simple truth.”

Rowling recognizes, as I do, that the suddenly fashionable idea of transgenderism is sweeping through society like a mania, and young girls are being pushed toward processes that will irrevocably harm them:

“I’m concerned about the huge explosion in young women wishing to transition and also about the increasing numbers who seem to be detransitioning (returning to their original sex), because they regret taking steps that have, in some cases, altered their bodies irrevocably, and taken away their fertility.”

Do you agree, Frederick?

Help me continue to be a loud voice against the insanity of the woke gender ideologists.

J.K. Rowling’s example of how to stand up to the organized pressure of the radical left is one we should emulate. She clearly expresses the truth that the trend of radical left gender politics has sacrificed the rights of girls and women to security:

“I refuse to bow down to a movement that I believe is doing demonstrable harm in seeking to erode ‘woman’ as a political and biological class and offering cover to predators like few before it.”

In Canada, we have our own problems with the onslaught of radical left gender ideology. Bill C-16 has enshrined this notion, however vaguely defined, in Canadian law.

The term “woman” has to mean something. But not in Canada.

In 2017, Canada’s Parliament passed Bill C-16, a bill that amended the Canadian Human Rights Act and enshrined “gender ideology” into Canadian law.

Canada’s C-16 effectively legislates that “woman” means nothing. “Female women” everywhere in Canada stand to suffer the consequences of that.

I will stand up for women and fight back against gender ideology by repealing Bill C-16.

I will also ban sex-changes for minors and vote against C-8, which will imprison parents for attempting to help children accept the bodies with which they were born.

Biological sex is real. The differences between women and men are real.

It’s time we all declare it, very loudly.

Open Letter to Jasper Town Councilby Monika Schaefer

Open Letter to Jasper Town Council

01 Monday Jun 2020

Today, June 1st, 2020, they are apparently re-opening the town of Jasper, but with limitations and a suggestion to “bring your own covid kit”. That means masks, hand-sanitizers and gloves. While the lock-down happened in more places than just Jasper (big understatement – I know) the absurdity of it struck me as particularly acute there when I visited a few days ago.

Screen Shot 2020-06-01 at 8.54.09 AM

31 May 2020

Dear Mayor Richard Ireland, and fellow Councillors,

On May 26, 2020 I visited my old home town of Jasper. Where there should be bustling activity, I found a ghost town. In front of the town entrances, signs scream go away with the words “CRITICAL SERVICES ONLY!”. Upon entering a building, one is commanded to first sanitize the hands before speaking.

Enough already! This Corona hysteria is based on distortions, lies and misrepresentations. By going along with the “authorities” and their nonsensical “recommendations”, you are participating and propelling our lemming walk into total police state / medical martial law. Surely you know that there is much more going on with this response to the hyped up plandemic (not a typo) than meets the eye on the television.

Mayor Ireland, what do you mean by telling the public that your “backyard” is not ready yet? What is it that needs to be ready? Why don’t you just tell the businesses, the hotels and restaurants to open their doors. Put the Welcome mat out. The rest will take care of itself.

Here are a few questions to think about.

  • How much sense does “social distancing” make, when in fact the isolation will weaken our immune systems?
  • Why are the so-called authorities recommending wearing masks, when doing so for any length of time is actually bad for your health? Not enough oxygen, too much carbon dioxide, and breathing in your own air can lead to illness.
  • Is it just coincidence that the hardest hit areas of Covid-19 happen to be the same areas where 5G has been rolled out? (Remember Wuhan?) And is it just coincidence that EMF radiation causes the same symptoms as Covid-19 is said to cause?
  • Did you know that the tests for this Corona virus do not actually test specifically for Covid-19? They test for exosomes, which are essentially genetic material. During the course of the test, they double the material and keep on doubling it until they arbitrarily decide they have amplified the material enough. Any one of us could test positive some days, negative other days, quite randomly and depending how many times the testers double our material. This means that there are many false positives. Does this not make the tests meaningless?
  • Were you aware that doctors and nurses are pressured to write Covid19 on death certificates, even if the patient died of other causes? And did you know that they need only suspect that the patient had Covid19? They do not even have to test for it. It seems that almost everybody who dies these days has Covid19 on their death certificate. Why are doctors pressured into making this diagnosis? Might there be an ulterior agenda?
  • Even if we assume “social distancing” works, how does it make sense to close outdoor spaces, when in fact it would be easiest to practice “social distancing” outside?
  • Do you think it is good for the children’s health to traumatize them and terrorize them with this big bad bogeyman of a disease? How many children have died of Covid19? Are you aware that the stress of fear, especially constant fear, is bad for our health?
  • Even if you believe the numbers, is this disease really that deadly? Why did they not lock down and shut down the world during flu season every single year? Many people die of the annual flu, especially old people. I hear that in Alberta the average age of death with Covid19 is 83. Is this good reason to destroy small businesses, shut down schools, and put everyone in a state of fear?
  • They tell us that you can have the disease, then recover, but that you can then get it again. They also tell us that the vaccination will carry the virus and that is supposed to make us immune. How does that make sense?
  • Why do small businesses get shut down while large businesses remain open? Are small family run businesses more prone to spreading disease than the Walmart and Safeway stores?
  • Do you think it is good and right that old people in care homes are forbidden from seeing their loved ones, just in their moment of need, sometimes at end of life?
  • Why is it that meat packing plants and other food producers seem to be disproportionately hit with outbreaks (or so they tell us)? Why are they dumping milk and telling farmers in some regions to plow their crops under? It would not be the first deliberately induced famine – just research the Holodomor.
  • Have you ever heard of predictive programming? And have you heard of Event 201? That was a planning event for a Corona virus pandemic, held in October 2019. Have you heard of Agenda 21?
  • Do you believe everything they tell us is true?

I could go on with more questions about this Corona virus “pandemic”, but those will suffice as “food for thought”. I have looked into this, and have come to the conclusion that what we are witnessing is nothing less than the implementation of a New World Order, and it is pure communism. If they succeed, it will be a tyrannical one-world-government police state in which our every move will be monitored, controlled and dictated. We will be slaves in a dystopia. We will be force vaccinated, and the vaccine will not be good for us.

Let us look at the local health scene in Jasper as it relates to this so-called virus. It will provide us with an excellent example of how reality is distorted.

In Jasper there were 9 cases of Covid19. Eight recovered and one died so far. The man who died had a tube up his nose and schlepped his oxygen tank around with him long before this so-called pandemic began. He was 86 years old when he died. His health was extremely compromised already. Yet he makes up the statistic of Covid19 death in Jasper. Repeat that scenario everywhere. That is a typical story, not the exception.

On May 26, the day I was in Jasper, there was one patient in the hospital. And yet we are left with the impression from the mass media that health care workers are over-worked. Again, repeat that scenario everywhere. Hospitals are largely empty.

Who are these authorities who are giving out the orders? They have no authority over us! They have acquired their so-called authority through deception and crime. When we obey that ill-begotten authority, we give them legitimacy. They do NOT have our best interests at heart. They are destroying us.

Fear is a powerful control tool. So is the money they are handing out, to keep everyone calm, docile, and quiet. For now.

Already they speak of the second wave (and third… and fourth…). It is all planned. Like a Boa Constrictor tightens its grip just when the intended prey exhales in order to take a new breath, this is how the New World Order is being implemented. Relax a little, then lock down harder, and harder, squeezing the last breath of life / freedom out.

By “obeying” the insane lockdown and social distancing measures, we are willingly walking into this dystopian nightmare. If we are too stupid to recognize it, maybe we deserve it? No! Millions are awake to the agenda, but the quislings still go along with their puppet-masters.

You are in a position to say NO to the “orders”. Those orders are not laws. They are recommendations, and even if they were laws, they would not be legitimate. We can ALL just say no, in fact we MUST say no to this, in order to survive as a people. We owe this to our children and grandchildren.

Your children and grandchildren will talk to you from the future, a future where every move and every breath and every conversation is controlled and monitored, and a future in which they quite possibly are hungry, they will ask you: “Ma, Pa, Grandma, Grandpa, what did you do in 2020?”

And you will say: “I obeyed the health authorities, and I obeyed the government. I trusted them.

Wake up! Resist this tyranny! We will take back our world! Work, play, and gather again. Shed our fear. That’s enough idiocy. Let’s get back to living again.

If we stop consenting to our enslavement, then it will not happen. We are many. They are few.

Monika Schaefer

P.S. This wonderful piece of satire was not in the original email letter, but adding it here for my readers. Enjoy!