Free Speech in Mortal Peril in Canada, the U.K. & Germany 

Free Speech in Mortal Peril in Canada, the U.K. & Germany 

https://youtu.be/evAP1qI7Ay4

*Updates on the Alison Chabloz, & Monika & Alfred Schaefer

* Updates on Canadian cases — YOUR WARD NEWS, Bill Whatcott, now charged by the outgoing Pakistani, Moslem AG for “hate” & other

LETTER TO FOREIGN AFFAIRS MINISTER CHRYSTIA FREELAND CALLING FOR CONSULAR MONITORING OF MONIKA SCHAEFER’S FREE SPEECH TRIAL IN MUNICH

LETTER TO FOREIGN AFFAIRS MINISTER CHRYSTIA FREELAND CALLING FOR CONSULAR MONITORING OF MONIKA SCHAEFER’S FREE SPEECH TRIAL IN MUNICH

Canadian Association for Free Expression

Box 332,

Rexdale, Ontario, M9W 5L3

Ph: 289-674-4455; FAX: 289-674-4820

Website: http://cafe.nfshost.com

Paul Fromm, B.Ed, M.A. Director


June 21, 2018


Honourable Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Foreign Affairs.
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A6

Re: MONIKA SCHAEFER, JAILED IN MUNICH

Dear Minister Freeland:

I am writing out of deep concern  about a Canadian now languishing in a German prison and now about to face trial under a law, Sec. 130 of the German Criminal Code having to do with racial incitement.

 

The woman, Monika Schaefer was born in Canada and is a Canadian citizen. On January 3, while visiting her brother and attending a trial in Munich, she was seized and arrested and sent to Stadelheim, a maximum security prison in Munich. She was visited by an official from the Canadian Consulate who offered her some help with matters in Canada but informed her they were only allowed to visit every six months. She remained imprisoned WITHOUT being charged until mid-May. Her trial begins July 3.

 

Several weeks ago her brother Alfred was advised by the Canadian Consul in Munich that, on Ottawa’s orders, there would be no consular observer at her two week trial. This is a matter of free speech and protection of Canadians travelling abroad. Let’s be clear: Ms Schaefer could face five years in prison. The issue before the court is a video she recorded in June, 2016 in which she apologizes to her late mother for haranguing her as a teenager for not having “done something” to stop the killings of Jews in WWII.

 

Actually, if we believe in freedom of speech, her views, like them of not as expressed in her six minute video “Sorry, Mom, I Was Wrong About the Holocaust,” should not matter.

 

The absence an observer from the Consulate sends a distinct message to the German authorities: We are not interested in this woman; do as you please. That is appalling.

 

When I and others have sought to inquire from various government officials about what is being done for Monika Schaefer, we are shuffled aside by the invocation of the Right to Privacy Act.  This is the typical response: “Please know that consular officials are bound by the Privacy Act and cannot release details about consular cases. This also applies to the case of Ms. Schaefer. I can, however, confirm that Canadian officials in Germany are providing consular assistance to her.”

 This is one of the most misused bureaucratic excuses for keeping matters secret. We are not inquiring about Ms Schaefer’s sex life (or lack of it) in prison or about any allergies she might have but about what is being done to assist her.

 

We urge you to reconsider the decision and send an observer to Ms Schaefer’s trial. She is a violinist and has long taken a passionate interest in her community, having four times run in elections for the Green Party, which, I trust will not be held against her.  An observer lets the German authorities know that Canada’s government cares and is concerned about freedom of speech. We had hoped that more active interest on the part of the Canadian Government might have convinced the German authorities to avoid a trial and simplydeport her and send her home to Canada.

 

Sincerely yours,

 

Paul Fromm

Director

LETTER FROM POLITICAL PRISONER MONIKA SCHAEFER

LETTER FROM POLITICAL PRISONER MONIKA SCHAEFER
 

Munich

 
June 5, 2018
 
Dear Paul:
 
On May 31st, I received a large pile of mail, most of which was from the month of April, some of it even from March! They really let it accumulate a long time before handing it over to me. But they had delivered the occasional teaser before that, with newer more recent mail, a bit of a psychological trick, surely not on purpose though! They’re not that clever.
 
Amongst that pile were two of your cards from meetings, one postmarked 4th of April (8 weeks’ delivery time) and the other was from an April 23 meetings postmarked the 26th. So that one came through the rush delivery wagon, a mere 5 weeks underway. Thank you so much for those! Also, there were a few of your CAFE NEWSLETTERS in the pile. Sometimes I get them; sometimes I don’t. It depends on who’s working. …
 
Yes, definitely my German is improving and so is my French. I am using my time well here, studying actively to get my French back that I once-upon-a-time was fluent in but lost so much through ‘if you don’t use it, you lose it.” I am also composing a few new tunes. When I am working on that, I completely forget where I am. …
 
I had another hearing, the result of which I am still here, of course. Their written justifications for my continued incarceration were so ridiculous, twisted and turned, that it is obvious that the hearing was just for show. just going through the motions of what is required, but with a preconceived outcome.
 


 
 
 
In a paradoxical way, it frees me up even more to say and do as I please because whatever I say or do, they have predetermined the outcome anyway, What w wonderful sense of freedom that gives me!
 
Well, I think I’ll end on that note.
 
I hope you are receiving my letters. I am numbering them so you can tell if some go missing.
 
Take care, stay healthy. We need you, Paul. Thank you for all you do.
 
Much love, 
 
Monika 
 

m

The Zionist lobby’s erosion of freedom of speech in UK: The case of Alison Chabloz

The Zionist lobby’s erosion of freedom of speech in UK: The case of Alison Chabloz

Alison Chabloz

Gilad Atzmon writes:

The Jewish Chronicle seems dismayed that the singer-songwriter Alison Chabloz has escaped jail time, at least for the time being. But the message conveyed by Ms Chabloz’s conviction is devastating for Britain. This country has, in just a short time, become a crude authoritarian state.

Chabloz was sentenced by District Judge John Zani to 20 weeks imprisonment, suspended for two years, for posting supposedly “grossly offensive songs” on the internet. It seems that music is now deemed a major threat to Britain.

Chabloz was also banned from posting anything on social media for 12 months. I am perplexed. What kind of countries pre-vet social interaction and intellectual exchange? Israel imposes such prohibitions on its Palestinian citizens. Soviet Russia banned certain types of gatherings and publications and, of course, Nazi Germany saw itself qualified to decide what type of texts were healthy for the people, and actively burned books. I guess that Britain is in good company.

Chabloz was further “ordered to complete 180 hours of unpaid work”. This amounts to something in the proximity of 90 Jazz gigs. And Chabloz is required to attend “a 20-day rehabilitation programme”. In 21st century Britain, a singer-songwriter has been sentenced to “re-education” for singing a few tunes that offended some people. 

The initial objective of the Nazi concentration camps was also to “re-educate the people”. Dachau was built to re-educate cosmopolitans and dissenter communists and turn them into German patriots.

I wonder what this particular rehabilitation programme will entail for the revisionist singer? Chabloz was guilty of introducing new lyrics to the Jewish folk song Hva Nagila. Will she now have now to learn to sing the song in Yiddish, or maybe to try to fit her own original “subversive” lyrics to the music of Richard Wagner? Who is going to take care of Chabloz’s education, and what happens if the singer insists on continuing to mock the primacy of Jewish suffering or, far worse, compare Gaza to Auschwitz?

We may have to accept that our big Zionist brother is constantly watching us. If we want to keep out of trouble, we better self-censor our thoughts and learn to accept the new boundaries of our expression.

Satire aside, the Chabloz trial and other recent legal cases suggest to me that Britain is no longer the freedom-loving place in which I settled more than two decades ago. If freedom can be defined as the right to offend, Britain has voluntarily removed itself from the free world. In contemporary Britain, exercising the right to offend evidently leads to conviction and possible imprisonment. And who defines what constitutes an offence? British law fails to do so. Chabloz was disrespectful to some Jewish cult figures, such as Elie Wiesel and Otto Frank (the father of Anne Frank). Would Chabloz be subject to similar legal proceeding if she offended the Queen, the royal family or Winston Churchill? What message is Judge Zani sending to British intellectuals and artists? Since every person, let alone Jews, can be offended by pretty much anything, Britain is now reduced to an Orwellian dystopia. We may have to accept that our big Zionist brother is constantly watching us. If we want to keep out of trouble, we better self-censor our thoughts and learn to accept the new boundaries of our expression.

Democracies are sustained by the belief that their members are qualified to make decisions regarding their own education: they decide what films to watch, what books to read and what clubs to join. Seemingly, this is no longer the case in Britain. Decisions regarding right and wrong thoughts are now taken by “the law”. According to the Jewish Chronicle, Judge Zani told Chabloz that :“The right to freedom of speech is fundamental to a fully-functioning democratic society. But the law has clearly established that this right is a qualified right.”

While many of us believe that freedom of speech is an absolute right, Judge Zani made it clear today that this is not the case or at least not anymore. Freedom of speech in Britain is now “a qualified right”. In other words, the government and the judicial system are allowed to interfere with such right at any time. Just two years ago, the Crown Prosecution Service didn’t think that Chabloz should stand trial. Presumably at the time the CPS didn’t believe that Chabloz’ rights should be qualified or quantified. Two years later there has been a clear change in speech that is prosecuted.

Article 19e of The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, signed by Britain and enacted in 1948, declares: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” 

This was the law in 1948. In 2018, freedom and democracy are rights in memory only, for we experience them no more.

More Facebook Censorship: Advertizing of Anti-Planned Parenthood Video Banned

More Facebook Censorship: Advertizing of Anti-Planned Parenthood Video Banned
LA Logo.jpg
Facebook blocked and prevented us from advertising our video exposing Planned Parenthood’s cover-up of child sex abuse for over a WEEK.

phil, I need you to do these few things to help us fight back:

  1. Click the link here to watch the video that was blocked
  2. Share the video with your friends on Facebook and social media
  3. Forward this email to your fellow pro-life friends and encourage them to watch and share the video

phil, social media companies like Facebook and Twitter may be able to block our paid advertising, but they can’t block YOU from sharing these videos with your friends.

It is critically important you share these videos to spread the truth about Planned Parenthood’s exploitation of abuse victims – so more hearts and minds will change to be against the abortion industry.

phil, let’s show pro-lifers won’t be bullied into silence and will always stand up for the most vulnerable – our precious preborn children.

Lila-Rose-circle 1.png

For life,

Lila Rose
President & Founder 
Live Action

P.S. We must raise $50,000 by midnight THIS FRIDAY to make the greatest impact possible with this investigative report and docuseries, and with Facebook suppressing our advertisements, it’s even more critical we reach this goal. Will you join our fight by donating through the link below?

Give now: https://www.liveaction.org/support/expose-planned-parenthood/

Last Gasp in War on Free Speech By Ontario’s Outgoing Lesbian Premier & Her Moslem Pakistani Attorney General

Last Gasp in War on Free Speech By Ontario’s Outgoing Lesbian Premier & Her Moslem Pakistani Attorney General

 
They may be down, but their not yet out. Ontario’s rabidly anti-Christian and anti-free speech Liberals were trounced in the last election and reduced to a 7-MPP rump that doesn’t even qualify for official party status in the legislature. However, they are still in power promoting their pro-LGBTQ, pro-Moslem, anti-free speech agenda. Last year the now-defated Yasir Naqvi, Ontario’s Pakistani, Moslem Attorney General, gave the rarely granted but necessary consent for Sec. 319 “hate law” charges against Kevin J. Johnston, a critic of radical Islamd, and against Dr. James Sears, the editor, and Leroy St. Germaine, the publisher of YOUR WARD NEWS, for their critiques of Jews and extreme feminism. As their parting shot, they have charged Christian evangelist Whatcott for views expressed when he infiltrated the Toronto Gay Pride parade several years ago.
 
A Canada-wide warrant has been issued for his arrest. [Remember, the persecution of Christians does not only occur in formally communist states like Red China or North Korea; it also occurs in regimes ruled by Cultural Marxist].
 
Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION

Whatcott the subject of a Canada wide warrant

Postby Bill Whatcott » Thu Jun 14, 2018 4:55 pm

Dear Friends,

I found out yesterday I am the subject of a Canada wide arrest warrant issued by Toronto’s 51 Division Police Headquarters. It appears I am facing an indictable charge for “Public Incitement of Hatred.”

Public incitement of hatred
319 (1) Every one who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Wilful promotion of hatred
(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of

(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years

The “crime?” My ministry bringing the Gospel and the truth about homosexuality to Toronto’s homosexual pride parade in 2016. :icon_rolleyes:

To read about this “crime” that has caused the police to hunt me down in 2 provinces, go to my daughter’s home, and some of my friend’s houses searching for me and for which they appear to want to extradite me to Ontario to stand trial go here: viewtopic.php?f=16&t=10526

Anyways, I will be turning myself into the Calgary Police Service Headquarters on Friday, June 22 at 10:00 am.

Calgary Police Service Address: 5111 47 St. N.E. Calgary

My wife and Pastor Art Pawlowski are organizing a protest in front of the police headquarters in defense of religious freedom and freedom of speech. My wife will be speaking about this case at the March for Jesus in Calgary this coming Saturday.

If you wish to join them:

Jadranka Whatcott: 226-591-2014, e-mail: jadrankawhatcott@gmail.com
Pastor Art Pawlowski: 403-607-4434, e-mail: art@streetchurch.ca

In Christ’s Service
Bill Whatcott

“Therefore if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed.” John 8:36

Paul Fromm, Jim Rizoli, Diane King on the Brian Ruhe Show — We’ll Remember Who Are Enemies Were

Paul Fromm, Jim Rizoli, Diane King on the Brian Ruhe Show — We’ll Remember Who Are Enemies Were

YOUTUBE.COM
June 5, 2018. Revolution Radio with Brian Ruhe, Jim Rizoli, Diane King, Paul Fromm, Pete Papaherakles…

The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show (683) Paul Fromm – The Bravery Of James Keegstra

The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show (683) Paul Fromm – The Bravery Of James Keegstra

In today’s show originally broadcast on June 9 2018, EuroFolkRadio’s Andrew Carrington Hitchcock interviews Paul Fromm, for a show entitled, “The Bravery Of James Keegstra.”

We discussed: how James was a profoundly religious man; how James was a teacher who taught his students about the pernicious history of Zionism; how Jewish groups attacked James’s school board resulting in him being fired from his school and having his teaching license revoked; how James was one of the first people to be charged under Canada’s notorious Hate Speech laws, 35 years ago back in 1983; how the voluminous Jewish lobbies have an established strategy of demonizing, isolating, and criminalizing anyone who exposes their nefarious activities; how James’s persecution by the Canadian legal system went on for nearly a decade; how historically our Divine right to free speech has been part of our Christian culture, and notbecause this is a privilege granted by government; how James’s wife Lorraine faithfully supported him throughout his persecution; and many other topics.

Click Here To Listen To The Show

Click Here For Paul’s, “Canadian Association For Free Expression,” Website

You can join Paul’s informative email list by sending him an email to:

paul@paulfromm.com

Click Here For The Andrew Carrington Hitchcock Show Archive Where You Can Listen To Or Download All My Shows

The Peel Board of Education Owns Your Soul, If You’re a Teacher

The Peel Board of Education Owns Your Soul, If You’re a Teacher

The tyranny of Cultural Marxism and the suppression of free speech continues apace. Slavery is the condition where you are totally under the control of your owner. Labour traditionally meant your employer was entitled to you time and labour for a given number of hours at a certain wage. However, today  an employer seems entitled to control your views and expression even on your own time. That’s slavery!

 

 

An unnamed occasional elementary school teacher in Peel County (comprising Mississauga, Brampton and Caledon), just west  of Toronto  is being investigated for posting a picture (from the rear, so not identifiable) of a student with a funny Negro hair style juxtaposed with a comic picture of a black gangster  and the comment: “Who rocked it better. LOLOLO”

 

CityNews (June 4, 2018) reported:  ” An occasional teacher in the Peel District School Board (PDSB) has been banned from speaking with students or teachers after allegedly posting what could be deemed a racist photo of a student on social media.

Carla Pereira, spokesperson for the PDSB, said the Instagram post was brought to their attention over the weekend and an investigation by the school’s Superintendent of Education was launched on Saturday.

The image beside the young student is of “Loc Dog” a character played by Marlon Wayans in the 1996 movie “Don’t be a menace to South Central While Drinking Your Juice in the Hood.”

The board tweeted that the post is “being investigated as anti-Black racism and being taken seriously.”  They have also reached out to the students guardians.

Pereira said the behaviour by the teacher is “simply unacceptable.”

“You’d be hard pressed to look at that particular image and say that its not a post that would be considered racism,” said Pereira.

“You look at it, you look at the use of black stereotypes and you look at how the child is being compared to another individual in not a very nice way. I think you’d be very hard pressed to say that its not anti-black racism – even though that’s what we’re hearing from some members of the community who are saying its just a joke its really not racist.” …

The PDSB’S social media guides for staff says:

“The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that teachers’ off-duty conduct, even when not directly related to students, is relevant to their suitability to teach. … According to the board, disciplinary action could range from a verbal reprimand to sensitivity training or even termination.”