Canada to Sentence Citizens to ‘Life Imprisonment’ for ‘Hate’
by Frank Bergman – March 13, 2024
The Canadian government is rapidly advancing plans to usher in full-blown tyranny and will soon begin sentencing citizens to life in prison if they are found guilty of committing the “crime” of so-called “hate”. Many are likening the new laws to George Orwell’s dystopian novel “1984” as Canada will soon start handing out severe penalties for wrongthink. The push for life sentences is part of “liberal” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s “anti-hate” legislation.
The shocking new law, buried in bill C-63, states:
Everyone who commits an offense under this act or any other act of Parliament, if the commission of the offense is motivated by hatred based on race, national or ethnic origin, language, color, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation or gender identity or expression, is guilty of an indictable offense and liable to imprisonment for life.
However, the bill only gets worse the further you read.
The new law will also offer cash bribes to members of the public “anonymously” snitch on their fellow citizens for committing “hate.”
The bill states:
It [C-63 bill] allows someone to make a complaint of a discrimination anonymously … if that hateful complaint is found legit, a maximum of 20,000 [Canadian] dollars goes to that person.
Meanwhile, similar legislation to define and crack down on in-person and online “hate” is being pushed across Europe.
Just recently, in Belgium, former Flemish parliamentarian Dries Van Langenhove was sentenced to one year in prison. The reason for this sentence was for sharing supposedly “racist memes” in a private group chat.
The new law from Canada comes as Trudeau’s World Economic Forum-controlled administration seeks to rapidly advance the nation’s descent into globalist tyranny. The government has been pushing several new laws that seek to strip the public of their freedoms. As Slay News reported, among the draconian new laws are powers that allow authorities to begin jailing citizens who “might” commit a crime.
Trudeau’s government is pushing for the new “pre-crime” authority which officials claim will help to tackle so-called “hate crimes.” The new powers are buried in Trudeau’s “Online Harms Bill,” (Bill C-63) which is expected to soon be signed into law, the Daily Telegraph reports.The “Online Harms Bill” is designed to crack down on any opposition to the “progressive” agenda of Trudeau’s ruling Liberal Party. One of the measures within the bill would give judges the power to imprison individuals if they believe they “might” commit a crime in the future.
Meanwhile, the government is also pushing new laws that seek to criminalize Christianity, as Slay News recently reported. Trudeau’s administration is planning to make Bible reading and prayer considered “hate speech” – a “crime” punishable with prison time. Under Trudeau, a WEF Young Global Leader, the government is introducing an amendment to the Criminal Code. The amendment could see believers face jail time for expressing historic Christian teachings. The legislation, Bill C-367, will make it illegal to reiterate certain parts of the Bible.
By stripping away the “good faith” defense, the government will be able to prosecute Christians for what is deemed by the globalist state as “hate speech.” Traditional Christian practices such as celebrating Christmas or attending church service will be considered crimes that carry severe penalties.
Additionally, Slay News recently reported globalist lawmakers in Canada are pushing a disturbing new piece of legislation that seeks to jail members of the public who question the “Net Zero” agenda of the unelected WEF. The push aims to tackle so-called “climate skepticism” as governments around the world scramble to meet the WEF’s “Net Zero” goals. The legislation, Bill C-372, was introduced by Canada’s left-wing socialist New Democratic Party (NDP).
Under the bill, the promotion of fossil fuel use will be outlawed with restrictions similar to tobacco advertising applied. Those who speak in favor of fossil fuels, or criticize plans to eliminate them, will face massive fines and possible prison time.
The “anti-hate” laws are so extreme that even radical leftists are calling out the government over the push. The environmental activist, feminist, and author, Margaret Atwood slammed the government’s “Online Harms Bill” in a social media post.
Atwood called the bill “Trudeau’s Orwellian online harms bill” and stated “If this account of the bill is true, it’s Lettres de Cachet all over again,” referring to letters signed by the King of France granting him absolute authority. On Tuesday, Canadian psychologist Jordan Pederson, who’s already expressed shock and disapproval at the bill, responded to Atwood’s comments, stating:
“If even the mother of the progressive feminists in Canada thinks that Bill C-63 is dangerous then perhaps the rest of us might think twice as well.”
Amy Hamm, Victimized for Her Views on the Transgendered, Calls Bill C-63 “An Orwellian
Nightmare”
Amy Hamm, Victimized for Her Views on the Transgendered, Calls Bill C-63 “An Orwellian
Nightmare”
Speaking at a gathering of Reality Based Women Unite! in Toronto on March 8, International Women’s Day, Amy Hamm, whose case is discussed below warned: “The Online Harms bill will criminalize speech. We can be punished without even opening our mouths, for Internet postings. Bill C-63 is an Orwellian nightmare,” she added. “It is the last desperate attempt by a failed regime to silence its critics. Free speech has been in peril in Canada for many years. Freedom of speech must involve freedom from consequences like huge legal bills, job loss and public mockery.” Noting that Bill C-63 will allow anonymous complaints to the Canadian Human Rights Commission, she argued: “It’s difficult to fight against a group (complainant) that cannot be named.”
Amy Hamm said: “We live in a culture that is hellbent on silencing the voices of dissenting women. The state funded media does the bidding of a man who loves power as does our national intelligence service.” She said CSIS has been corrupted and now classifies those opposed to the LGBTQ agenda as “potential terrorists” and violent. [Several CAFE associates attended this event.]
New Westminster Nurse Amy Hamm, the Latest Victim of Professional Persecution As Canada becomes more and more a Cultural Marxist, woke controlled society, professional bodies are increasingly used to punish their members for their political opinions. The persecution of media star and author Jordan Peterson by the Ontario College of Psychologists comes to mind. He was sentenced to re-education sessions to be paid out of his own pocket. Now, there’s British Columbia nurse Amy Hamm. CBC (November 23, 2023) reports: “A B.C. nurse accused of making numerous ‘derogatory and discriminatory’ public statements about transgender people took the stand in her discipline hearing on Friday, telling the panel considering her case that she is not transphobic. During a hearing at the B.C. College of Nurses and Midwives, Amy Hamm of New Westminster testified that her advocacy on social and other platforms is meant to protect women and children from what she described as dangerous infringements into sex-segregated spaces. ‘I’m not transphobic. I don’t have any issue with trans people — it’s the infringement on women and children’s rights,’ Hamm told the college disciplinary panel. She said she is fighting against what she described as a ‘fringe’ movement of activists influencing official positions on transgender rights and access to gender-affirming care. ‘It’s a movement that is infringing on the rights of women and pushing institutions to adopt what are false and delusional beliefs,’ she said. Hamm faces allegations of unprofessional conduct for making “discriminatory and derogatory statements regarding transgender people” while identifying herself as a nurse, according to a citation from the college. Hamm frequently refers to transgender women as ‘men’ in social media posts, videos and podcasts, implying they pose a danger to cisgender [that’s woke-speak for normal] women and children. She has referred to the disciplinary proceedings as a ‘witch trial’ and suggested the college ‘would love for me to suicide myself.’ …. She told the panel she is particularly concerned about transgender women having access to women-only spaces including prisons and change rooms. She pointed to examples like Madilyn Harks, a transgender woman with a history of sexually assaulting young girls who has been housed in women’s correctional facilities. ‘It makes me extremely, extremely angry, and it feels as though people don’t seem to care what happens to these women,’ she said of female inmates. She said she completely rejects the concept of gender identity, calling it ‘anti- scientific, metaphysical nonsense.’” Political Prisoner Leslie Bory Not
You MUST Act Now: The Biggest Threat to Free Speech and the Internet in Our Lifetime – Bill C63
Mischievously entitled the “Online Harms Act”, Bill C-63 introduced in Parliament February 26 is the most serious threat to freedom of speech in our lifetime. You MUST act. Contact by mail, phone, but preferably by going and seeing your MP of whatever party. Insist that this Stalinist bill be withdrawn or defeated.
We’ll provide further details in the next issue of the Free Speech Monitor, but here are some of the worst highlights: Remember Stalin’s Russia made anti-Semitism punishable by death. Well, , by an amendment to the “hate law” (Section 318) will make advocating genocide punishable by up to life – yes, you read that right, LIFE – in prison. All that for running your mouth on the Internet. Only capital murder and treason can get you life in prison. Crimes where people, not the feelings of privileged groups, are hurt (assault, wounding) don’t get you life in prison. Remember that. after the Israel/Gaza war, genocide has become a loosey goosey concept. Many Zionists insist the slogan “from the river to the sea, Palestine shall be free” is a call for genocide. Clearly the mass bombing, starvation and displacement of the people in Gaza might be seen as such.
Punch someone in the nose and you could go to prison for life! No kidding. Kim Jong-Un could take lessons in repression from the ungrateful Ugandan Asian Arif Virani, who, as Trudeau’s Minister of “Justice”, repaid Canada’s hospitality after Idi Amin expelled his family, with this piece of police state thought control.
The Act says: “Everyone who commits an offence under this Act or any other Act of Parliament, if the commission of the offence is motivated by hatred based on race, national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression, is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for life.” So, supposing someone cuts you off while you are driving. You jump out of your car, cuss them out and punch them in the nose. You go to court for assault causing bodily harm. Today, you’d likely get a fine or a month in jail. HOWEVER, if you denounced the bad driver as a homosexual or blind Chinaman, your act might be seen as being motivated by hate against a privileged group and you could face life in prison. Move over, Paul Bernardo, another thought criminal will join you in jail.
Section 13 is back! It took more than a decade to get Parliament to rescind Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. It was used to punish people whose views on the Internet were “likely to expose to hatred or contempt” members of privileged groups – race, religion, sex, sexual orientation. That protection did not apply to White people or Christians as the Supreme Court made clear in its 2012 Whatcott ruling. Only “minorities” are protected. Well, Sec. 13 is back worse than ever. The Ugandan has trashed basic rights of Anglo-Saxon law. You may be the victim on an anonymous complaint. Your ancient right to face your accuser has just flown out the window: “The
Commission may deal with a complaint in relation to a discriminatory practice described in Section 13 without disclosing, to the person against whom the complaint was filed or to any other person, the identity of the alleged victim, the individual or group of individuals that has filed the complaint or any individual who has given evidence or assisted the Commission in any way in dealing with the complaint, if the Commission considers that there is a real and substantial risk that any of those individuals will be subjected to threats, intimidation or discrimination.” You can be fined up to $70,000 for your views. Oh, yes, and remember: Truth is no defence, as Ernst Zundel found out in the Zundelsite tribunal.
There’s even more state control and tyranny, but we’ll save that for the next issue.
outside Canada denounced the Broadcasting and Telecommunications Legislative Review (BTLR) panel’s
report released last week as a “breathtaking” and unprecedented plan to regulate the internet.
The government-assembled panel of broadcasting experts chaired by Janet Yale was tasked with advising the Liberals on overhauling the country’s allegedly outdated broadcasting laws. Its report recommended a massive expansion of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) as the renamed Canadian Communications Commission.
“A key recommendation was to extend licences currently granted to radio and television stations to all media content, along with a much stricter compliance regime,” noted the National Post’s John Ivison. Indeed, so strict is this proposed scheme that two former CRTC members are among the report’s fiercest critics.
Former CRTC vice-chair of telecommunications Peter Menzies wrote in the Globe and Mail that in a “breathtaking expansion of scope and bureaucratic hubris” and “a series of invasive and unjustifiable recommendations,” the panel “advocated for a sweeping series of interventions that would make all online media – from online sites such as Rabble to Rebel News and in any language – subject to government regulation.”
That was echoed by former CRTC commissioner Timothy Denton, who in a Financial Post op-ed wrote that the report advocates “an unprecedented power grab for the federal government and the CRTC” aimed “at nothing less than a statist counter-revolution against the internet.”
That was echoed by well-known Canadian pundit and political commentator Andrew Coyne.
The report is “breathtaking — a regulatory power grab without precedent, either in Canada or the democratic world,” noted Coyne in the Globe and Mail.
“Nobody elsewhere else is proposing anything like it, and for good reason: because it’s insane.”
But what the Liberal government will do remains a critical question after Heritage Minister Steven Guilbault caused a firestorm by first appearing to endorse the idea of government licenses for internet news sites, then reversing his position the next day. On Sunday, Guilbault told CTV News: “If you’re a distributor of content in Canada… we would ask that they have a licence, yes.” On Monday, both the minister and the prime minister insisted the Liberals won’t license internet news or regulate internet news.
But that’s not exactly reassuring given the report recommends that “companies delivering media content by means of the internet would be required to register with the new Canadian Communications Commission,” and that it makes “no mention here of any exemptions for news organizations,” noted Ivison.
And while the report’s “implications for press freedom are obvious – so obvious, that one would expect the whole newspaper industry to rise up as one and reject it,” it also contains an offer of “goodies” for that beleaguered sector, Coyne observed.
Indeed, even as critics allege the Trudeau government’s $595 million “media bail-out” announced in its last budget compromises Canada’s legacy media, the report outlines more ways “the government could help news outlets” losing out to digital competitors, the Globe and Mail reported.
It recommends that online media content providers must register with the CRTC and pay into a fund to support select Canadian news organizations, it reported.
Newspapers “would be eligible for subsidies paid for out of the taxes on aggregators and sharers, who would also be obliged to link” to those Canadian news sites the CRTC deems “accurate, trusted and reliable,” Coyne explained.
“Are we really going to bite the hand that feeds us, now or in the future?” he added.
Liberals and their beneficiaries believe they are “saving quality journalism,” noted Ivison, “while everyone else thinks it’s a transparent bribe.”
That’s echoed by Jack Fonseca, director of political operations at Campaign Life Coalition, Canada’s national pro-life, pro-family lobbying group. The Liberal “bailout of the privately-owned mainstream media was a bribe to ensure that major media outlets will become dependent on the government, and therefore not report anything critical about Trudeau, or else,” he told LifeSiteNews.
It’s similar to the Liberal government’s “new rules to muzzle so-called Third Party Advertisers at election time, including simple information posted on Canadian websites,” he said. Fonseca maintains those rules were “designed to de-platform all small-c conservative voices which might be critical of Liberal policies, including that of Campaign Life Coalition. We actually had to shut down our pro-life Voters’ Guide for months during the election, and then massively restrict access to it.”
Canadians should regard the recent controversial broadcasting report in the context of what they know about the Liberals, and particularly the prime minister, who in May 2014 expressed his admiration for China’s “basic dictatorship,” he pointed out.
“We need to take Trudeau at his word, and not just laugh at him as if he’s some kind of joke. He was deadly serious. A basic dictatorship is what he admires. And it seems fairly clear that’s where he’s trying to steer the country, with a clear plan in his own mind,” Fonseca said.
The possibility that the Liberals could “create a ‘media registry’ and start licensing internet and social media-based news outlets is the latest in a string of warning signs that Justin Trudeau is the most dangerous man in Canadian political history,” he added.
Moreover, if the Liberals move ahead with this plan, it’s reasonable to assume “websites like LifeSiteNews would be forced to shut down because the Liberal government would refuse to give them a license,” warned Fonseca.
“In short, Liberals will have total control of the internet and the power to block all dissenting voices.”
Contact information:
The Honourable Steven Guilbeault – Minister of Canadian Heritage 15 Eddy Street, 12th Floor Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0M5 Telephone: 819-997-7788 Email: hon.steven.guilbeault@canada.ca
Conservative MP Michelle Rempel Garner Shadow minister for industry and economic development Suite 115, 70 Country Hills Landing NW Calgary, AB T3K 2L2 Telephone: 403-216-7777 Email: Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca
I went to the KEG MANSION for a steak dinner, to celebrate my birthday. I’ve been going in there for the 25 yearsI went to the part of the KEG MANSION where I like to sit,, AT THE UPSTAIRS BAR. The BARTENDERESS/ waitress is rather LIBERAL, is wearing a skimpy TANK TOP and wall to wall TATTOOS, introduces herself, I said “tonight is my birthday, I have been coming in here for 30 years”. She said “we are out of prime rib”.. I said said “that is Ok I will have SIRLION, and an BTW, I don’t approve of MEN DRESSED AS WOMEN”… ( The MALE FLAMING FAG bartender / waiter beside her is sporting a skimpy TANK TOP, WOMEN’s PONY TAIL AND WOMEN’s MAKEUP AND EYELINER). Of course , 5 – 10 minutes later after the staff had their little “conference” This bull dyke manager comes up to me as I am trying to listen to my headphones and watch you tube/
Starts reading me the “RIOT ACT”She says :”We don’t tolerate such speech here .”
I said “look it is FREE SPEECH, OKAY, and I am a 25 year customer” ” It is your premises, if you don’t want me here, I will leave”.“You are cutting off a 30 customer over your politics” I walked out. The creature had to follow me.I WILL NEVER GO BACK THERE AS LONG AS I LIVE
tuck to my guns.. I DON’T NEED TO SEE A FLAMING, CROSS DRESSING FAG IN MY FACE.. NOT WHEN I AM PAYING… FAG COULD HAVE TONED DOWN HIS DRESS. BUT NOO, THEY HAVE TO PUSH IT, So, I went to the ANOTHER PUB had the 6 oz steak sandwich and fries.
It has now been one week since Patriotic Alternative Regional Organiser for Yorkshire, Sam Melia, was sentenced to two years in prison for his “intentions” behind publishing stickers online that the prosecution said were legal and truthful.
Now that the dust has settled and we have heard from Sam and know where he is, I thought I’d put together a list of things we can do to help Sam and to push back against his unjust conviction and sentencing.
Before I begin, I would like to inform people that we are pursuing legal avenues in relation to Sam’s conviction. I am in touch with Sam’s solicitor and barrister, plus other legal professionals, and we are looking into what options are available to us. I hope people understand that due to not wanting to share too much information with people who wish Sam harm, we are keeping our cards close to our chest until we have something more concrete to report back.
I’d also like to say thank you to everybody who has helped to raise awareness of Sam’s case. The international response to his conviction and sentencing has been something that we never expected and when I told Sam about it on the phone this week, he was made up!
Write a Letter to Sam
Sam advised me yesterday that apart from missing his family, the worst thing about being in prison is the boredom. Please consider writing him a letter to show him some support and also help him to pass the time.
Please send any letters to:
Samuel Melia
A3370FC
HMP Leeds
2 Gloucester Terrace
Stanningley Road
Leeds
West Yorkshire
LS12 2TJ
If you would like a letter in return, you will need to write your name and address on the back of the envelope. Sam can buy stamps from the canteen every Saturday. I asked the lady on reception if we could send him stamps and she said no he has to buy them himself, however you can include a stamped addressed envelope with the first letter this week.
Please note, if you get too political in your letter, they won’t let it through.
Email Sam
If you’d like to write an email to Sam, you can use this website to do so: https://www.emailaprisoner.com/
You have to add credit to your account. It cost me 68p to send him an email and pay for his reply back. They print your email off and hand it to Sam, and he gets a blank page to hand write a message back. They then scan his response and email it back to you. It took 24 hours for my message to get to Sam and 48 hours for Sam’s message to then get back to me, so it’s pretty fast!
Sam is in HMP Leeds and his prison number is A3370FC. Please remember to put Samuel Melia and not Sam as his name.
Send Books to Sam
If you would like to send a book to Sam, we have to send this directly from one of the prison’s preferred suppliers. Unfortunately we cannot send books (or anything else) directly to Sam. To send Sam a book, please add the book to your basket on one of the following websites:
Blackwell’s
Foyles
Mr B’s Emporium of Reading Delights
Waterstones
WH Smith
Wordery
Housmans
Incentive Plus
Prisons Org UK
You’ll then need to write “Samuel Melia” and his prison number (A3370FC) as the recipient, and send it directly to HMP Leeds. As above, anything too political won’t get through.
This morning I sent Sam 10 books including 2 adult colouring books, 2 puzzle books, 2 history books, 2 journals and 2 fiction books. He enjoys anything outdoorsy (including camping and hiking) DIY, homesteading, exercising, climbing, comedy, graphic novels (he likes Batman), metal music, history, skateboarding, computer games and puzzles/quizzes.
Raise Awareness of Sam’s Case
Another way in which you can help is by raising awareness of Sam’s case. There are multiple benefits to doing this including showing the System that we won’t be silent while they attack our people simply for raising awareness about the terrible things that are happening to us. It also shines a light on their anti-White hypocrisy, helping to awaken other people to nationalism and bring people to our cause.
The response to Sam’s case has been unbelievable so far, with him receiving support from all over the world including from GBNews, Darren Grimes, Alex Jones, Red Ice, Edward Dutton, Steve Laws, Paul Joseph Watson, Count Dankula, Leo Kearse, Keith Woods, Morgoth, Millennial Woes, Tommy Robinson, Britain First, Warren Balogh, Eric Striker, Emily Youcis, Blair Cottrell, Thomas Sewell, Sascha Roßmüller, Adam Green, Way of the World, Joel Davis, James Goddard, Active Patriot, Lotus Eaters, Andreas Johansson, Lauren Southern, Nativist Concern, Tollah, Anne Marie Waters, History Debunked, Mike Enoch, UK Column, Counter-Currents, Pox Populi, Endeavour, UNN, Guardians of Aria, The Woodlander, Heritage and Destiny, Nathan Damigo, Hiraeth, Jody Kay, Horus, The Golden One, David Kurten, Brendan O’Neill at Spiked, Full Haus, No Chance, and even Elon Musk himself!
It’s important to note that not all of these people agree with Sam (or even like him or Patriotic Alternative) but they have taken a stand for his right – and as an extension our right – to freedom of speech, and they have highlighted the anti-White bias of the System. Coming down so hard on Sam for publishing legal stickers has united the “right” on an issue more than I’ve ever seen before in my time in nationalism.
Thanks to the huge public response to Sam’s case, more people have seen his stickers over the last week than they ever did over the two years that the Hundred Handers existed. It is also a massive kick in the teeth to the anti-White System that jailed Sam “as a deterrent” to others who have the same beliefs. The system certainly made an example out of Sam, but not in the way they intended.
We also have the hashtag #FreeSamMelia on Twitter/X.
To follow on from my previous point of the sentencing being meant to act as a deterrent to other nationalists, getting active in an organisation is the best way you can ensure their failure here. They may have temporarily taken Sam out for a few months, but let’s step into his shoes until he’s back and let them see that this tactic of theirs won’t work on Sam or anybody else for that matter.
If you’re wondering whether there is going to be some sort of street action towards Sam’s sentencing, the answer is yes. Get involved with Patriotic Alternative to find out more.
Contact Your Local MP
If street activism isn’t for you then please consider contacting your local MP or political representative to share Sam’s story and ask them what they think. Even a negative response is positive because it highlights the fragility and anti-White bias of the System. If you get a response, feel free to share it with us at: enquiries@patrioticalternative.org.uk.
South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem (R) on Thursday boasted that she signed the “strongest” hate crime bill in America into law to “stop antisemitism” and “ensure the security of God’s chosen people.”
https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=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%3D%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1766122440814416267&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.informationliberation.com%2F%3Fid%3D64329&sessionId=4f4758f6bb6c4d8e12a69755e33258929558b2ac&siteScreenName=infolibnews&theme=light&widgetsVersion=2615f7e52b7e0%3A1702314776716&width=550px Noem said in a press release after signing the bill that South Dakota is giving Jews additional special privileges under their anti-discrimination laws because they are “God’s chosen people.”
Noem’s full statement: Ensuring the Security of God’s Chosen People
By: Governor Kristi Noem
March 8, 2024
When I was growing up, my dad would always gather our family together and we would pray for Israel. It was instilled in me from a very young age that the Jews were Gods [sic] chosen people, that Israel was the Holy Land, and that we should always pray for them.
I brought those fundamental ideals with me when I was in the State Legislature, when I served in Congress, and now as Governor of South Dakota. Supporting the State of Israel and our Jewish community has always been extremely important to me. It’s important to support Israel for spiritual, historical, and national security reasons. I am continuing to stand with the Jewish people by signing historic legislation to protect them from antisemitism.
I was shocked and devastated to see the horrific terrorist attacks on the State of Israel on October 7th, 2023. And I have continued to be heartbroken to see radical individuals in the United States of America standing with Hamas – standing with terrorists. Ever since October 7th, we have seen a shocking spike in antisemitic acts of hatred around the world. We have even seen isolated incidents right here in South Dakota.https://www.youtube.com/embed/llyzlOAbrqg?si=EcAKfh4Qdx622ssN No one should ever feel concerned for their safety when going to school, when going to work, when they are just trying to live their normal lives. But that is the reality for so many Jewish people across America right now. We see antisemitism on college campuses, among high school students, and even as young as middle and elementary school students. That is unacceptable.
I was very proud to sign HB 1076, a very important bill to combat antisemitism. This bill defines antisemitism and makes it easier to prove when discriminatory conduct is motivated by antisemitism. It is an impactful piece of legislation that will ensure the safety of Jewish people and strengthen South Dakota’s anti-discrimination laws.
We held a beautiful, moving signing ceremony for this bill in the Rotunda of our State Capitol in Pierre. Many prominent Jewish leaders attended, including Elan Carr, the CEO of the Israeli-American Council for Action, nationally renowned Jewish leader and founder of the Jacobson Society Dan Rosen, Rabbi and Director of the National Jewish Advocacy Center Dr. Mark Goldfeder, Rabbi Mendel Alperowitz of the Chabad Jewish Center of South Dakota, Renie Schreiber on behalf of Yinam Cohen, Consul General of Israel to the Midwest, and Jordan Cope from Stand With Us. A few of our special guests said some words about the impact this legislation will have for the Jewish people. You can view footage of the full bill signing ceremony here.
There are a few other people to thank for their efforts in getting this bill passed and signed into law, including Representative Mike Stevens, Representative Rebecca Reimer, Dan Lederman, and Stephen Rosenthal.
The prime sponsors of this bill, Representative Deutsch and Senator Mehlhaff, put in a lot of hard work with my office and with members of the Jewish community to make sure this is the best bill possible to stop antisemitism and hate. This bill puts the gold standard International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism into state law.
The IHRA defines anti-Semitism as: – Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
– Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
– Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
– Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
– Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
– Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
– Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
– Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
– Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
– Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.No other ethnic or religious group in America is afforded any such privileges.
“Given the large-scale resurgence of international antisemitism today, it is now essential to universally criminalize antisemitism,” said Alan Baker, the head of the international law program at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. “This must be done despite anticipated negative reactions by Muslim groups and despite the apathetic and misplaced sense of political correctness that is most prevalent in Europe and North America.”
They warned that such laws (as Noem passed in South Dakota) would be “harmful to the Jewish community” as they would give “the appearance that the Jewish community exercises undue influence in government.”
Though the ADL had privately warned against said anti-BDS laws, other Jewish groups forged ahead with them and the ADL not only got on board with the anti-BDS effort but became an enthusiastic supporter.
Ontario Reopening Act – Lockdowns- Shutting down small business
Mar 9, 2024
In 2020, Adam Skelly was one of the first people in Canada or the world to stand against the medical deception and tyranny of the covid-19 agenda. This quite restaurant owner, husband and father became the tip of a spear against authoritarianism, lawlessness and human rights violations.
We know the arch-criminals of covid, are plotting against us still. The WHO’s Pandemic Preparedness Treaty and IHR amendments; mRNA factories being built all around the world; continued gain of function research; and the WEF telegraphing “disease X” are clear evidence of this.
Adam Skelly is still the tip of a vital spear in Ontario and Canada; the tip of this spear is placed against the heart of a criminal conspiracy and abuse of power that has hurt all of us, left many injured, and cost others their lives.
If Adam and his team succeed, as they should, in their legal challenge against the province of Ontario, the attorney general, and public health for their abuse of us all using the “re-opening act”; then all of us and our children are safer moving forward. Please grab onto this spear and put your weight into it.
Adam Skelly is a humble man who choose to stand up for what is right. Though he has risked by far the most in this situation; it is everyone of us who stand to be either liberated or trampled on depending on the outcome.
Please support Adam Skelly’s fight for all of us in whatever way you can. Below is an important message from all of us at Take Action Canada.
The stakes are high and we need your financial support for a legal challenge against the province of Ontario, the Attorney General, and Public Health for instituting the Re-Opening Ontario Act Regulation 82/20 during Covid.
This Orwellian regulation provided the government with broad power to shut down businesses and limit organized events and gatherings. Since the height of the “medical emergency”, the data has demonstrated that these lockdown provisions destroyed small businesses, families, mental health, and the economy. It became a perfect example of the “cure” being worse than the disease. This is a fact that has been corroborated by experts with data now that enough time has passed to reflect.
You may remember the plight of Adam Skelly. He was a conscientious objector who put himself, his family, and his business all on the line, on our behalf, to fight against the lockdown. In November 2020, when Regulation 82/20 was starting to be enforced, Adam decided to defy the government at great personal and financial risk and announced that he was keeping his small restaurant open for business. Adamson BBQ remained open and like-minded people came from all over to show their support. Adam’s defiance of the regulation became a rallying cry for many individuals and small businesses. The media portrayed Adam as irresponsible and a criminal for defying the orders.
The police fined him many times, but he continued to remain open. When the fines didn’t work, the police changed his locks in the middle of the night in order to lock him out of his business. With everything to lose, Adam broke into his own restaurant and reopened. Adam’s defiance was receiving national press so the now disgraced Major Tory and the Toronto Police decided to make an example of him to send a message to all small businesses in the province. In a sinister example of overkill, the police sent approximately 250 police officers, horses, and cruisers to his restaurant to arrest him. The images from that evening were plastered all over social media and the mainstream media. Adam never recovered from the loss.
Adam Skelly’s challenges may be the impetus for this lawsuit, but he is taking it forward courageously on all of our behalf and with the support of the Concerned Constituent of Canada (CCCan).
There are over 400,000 small businesses (categorized as 1 – 99 employees) in Ontario.
According to Statistics Canada, 19.8% of all small businesses with 1-19 employees shut down during the lockdowns.
13.4% of small businesses with 20-99 employees were lost.
These shutdowns didn’t just affect the business owners. The closing of each business creates cascading ramifications for their employees’ and suppliers’ livelihoods. Many survived on government handouts, but the bill has come due.
Bankruptcies are on a 10-year high, up 55% year over year.
It is estimated that small businesses are carrying an average of $190,000 in Covid debt with another 18.5% of small businesses considering declaring bankruptcy now that the government programs have subsided. The CERB program just kicked the can down the road.
We need to seize this opportunity to ensure that this does not happen again. That the next time, and there will be a next time, governmental powers will be limited and the standard of proof will be higher
The time is now. Please defend our future by donating to support this important legal challenge by etransfer to donations@takeactioncanada.ca or with a debit/credit card.