Free Speech: Five Centuries of Struggle and One Forgotten Hero

From Magna Carta to Tyndale’s Bible, how Christian conviction built the liberties we now take for granted

Right Times with Kathy Gyngell

Aug 07, 2026

A guest post by Bob Robinson.

FREEDOM of speech is under threat from authorities seeking to impose international rules on nation states and deny access to information. This is not the first time English people have been called upon to oppose the centralisation of power and control of knowledge. Civil wars were fought in defence of the principles of Magna Carta. The Reformation removed the corrupt and stifling influence of the Catholic Church. International wars have been fought against the ambitions of authoritarian regimes.

This year marks the 500th anniversary of William Tyndale’s English translation of the New Testament. Its impact on the development of the English language, religious liberty, and national identity was immense. Tyndale, a multi-lingual scholar from Gloucestershire, translated the Bible into English from its Latin, Greek and Hebrew versions, enabling more people to read and understand Scripture for themselves. Before then, religious teaching had been restricted to an elite group of learned men deemed to be ‘best qualified’ to decide how Scripture should be interpreted and explained to the majority.

The invention of the printing press dramatically increased access to information in books and pamphlets. In a similar way, the internet has democratised knowledge and the seeking of truth. When the printing and distribution of his Bible was banned in England, Tyndale travelled to Germany where a clandestine printer produced hundreds of pocket editions of his translated Bible. These were then smuggled into England. He was hunted across Europe and eventually captured in Antwerp, where he was executed by strangulation and then burned at the stake. Today, Tyndale should be remembered as one in a long line of Englishmen who stood up for freedom of conscience and the right to free speech.

Share Right Times with Kathy Gyngell

Christianity has a remarkably long association with the people of the British Isles. Folklore tells of Christ visiting England alongside his metal-trading uncle, Joseph of Arimathea. According to Orthodox tradition the first Bishop of Britain was Saint Aristobulus, one of the Seventy Apostles sent around the Roman Empire. He arrived in Britain shortly after the Roman invasion in AD 43. At this time, Christians who proclaimed their faith were persecuted by the authorities; nevertheless, they remained defiant and refused to stay silent about their beliefs. The early Church was characterised by cults built around local Romano-British martyrs, such as Saint Alban. Many of these saints have since been lost to the Anglican Church, but are still celebrated by the Orthodox Church.

Following the Roman withdrawal in AD 410, indigenous Romano-Britons were unable to prevent the widespread settlement of Anglo-Saxon pagans. Christianity was confined to the western and northern parts of the British Isles, and was introduced to the Anglo-Saxons in England in the early 7thcentury. Biblical principles and Christian moral guidance underpin English common law, which developed from a series of legal precedents taken from the wisdom, customs, and traditions of the Anglo-Saxons. For hundreds of years, this legal system has provided a defence of individual freedoms and rights.

The ‘Golden Rule’ in the Gospel of Luke ‘to do unto others as you would have them do to you’ is lost on many in the modern secular age. Unnecessarily abusive social media posts considered ‘hurtful’ are used as an excuse by authorities to clamp down on freedom of expression and speech. This has been helped by the English legal system moving away from flexible, common-sense case law and towards poorly defined statutory codes that are open to subjective interpretation by social media platform moderators and unelected judges.

Magna Carta was sealed by King John in 1215. Its principal author, Stephen Langton (Archbishop of Canterbury at the time), opposed the notion that monarchs could act above the law. He believed that morally upstanding citizens were a prerequisite for a just and prosperous Christian society. Individuals needed to operate with honour and integrity to find their true sense of spiritual and secular purpose. For this to happen they had to be free, and a system of law based on truth, fairness and transparency had to underpin these freedoms. If all people were treated were treated equally under the law, individual rights and freedoms would be respected across society. Today, this basic concept, the cornerstone of Western civilisation, is at risk from legally enforceable protected characteristics which have created a hierarchy of victimhood and ill-defined differentiation.

In the 14th century, English dissenters challenged the authority and corruption of the Catholic Church. The Lollards (a ‘proto-Protestant’ movement) included academics such as John Wycliffe (the first translator of the English Bible), and radical priests including John Ball (one of the leaders of the Peasants’ Revolt). Although many dissenting Lollards were hunted down by the authorities, their ideas never disappeared. Wycliffe’s work would later influence reformers such as Martin Luther. In the 16th century, a new Protestant theology based on a deep understanding of the Bible emerged in parts of Europe and in England.

Tensions between Catholicism and various strands of Protestantism existed at this time. Christian attitudes towards religious tolerance were influenced by the 17th century English philosopher John Locke, who argued for a separation of government and religion. This was based on a recognition that individuals could not be forced into a particular faith or way of thinking, as this only came with a genuine change of mind. Furthermore, while governments have powers to impose laws by force, they have no power to change what an individual believes to be true. The Toleration Act 1689 put much of this reasoning into law.

Western nations have since thrived in an atmosphere of tolerance, underpinned by the right to freedom of speech. For Christians, the role of nations is integral to God’s redemptive plan, and in the Gospel of Matthew there is reference to Jesus telling his disciples to ‘go and make disciples of all nations’. The new covenant in the New Testament is a promise from God that does not just apply to one specific group. Anyone in any nation who believes can be part of the covenant, and each nation should protect the right of every person to have a faith if they chose to.

Share Right Times with Kathy Gyngell

English missionaries spread Christianity across northern Europe during the early Middle Ages. In the 18th and 19th centuries, they took the Gospel message around the world, helping to end slavery, human sacrifice and widow-burning. English Christians developed a just legal system, reformed a corrupt Church, and introduced greater religious and political toleration. It is worrying that modern-day secular leaders fail to acknowledge our Christian heritage. The freedoms and liberties we enjoy today did not just arrive overnight. They have been fought for over many generations. While we remember the sacrifice made by William Tyndale some 500 years ago, we should also remember that it takes only one or two neglectful generations to erase a historic legacy that represents the pinnacle of human achievement.

Bob Robinson is the author of
Identity Lost, Identity Regained: The Story of England and the English People.

Thank you for reading and supporting us. Please

Free Speech: Five Centuries of Struggle and One Forgotten Hero

From Magna Carta to Tyndale’s Bible, how Christian conviction built the liberties we now take for granted

Right Times with Kathy Gyngell

Aug 07, 2026

A guest post by Bob Robinson.

FREEDOM of speech is under threat from authorities seeking to impose international rules on nation states and deny access to information. This is not the first time English people have been called upon to oppose the centralisation of power and control of knowledge. Civil wars were fought in defence of the principles of Magna Carta. The Reformation removed the corrupt and stifling influence of the Catholic Church. International wars have been fought against the ambitions of authoritarian regimes.

This year marks the 500th anniversary of William Tyndale’s English translation of the New Testament. Its impact on the development of the English language, religious liberty, and national identity was immense. Tyndale, a multi-lingual scholar from Gloucestershire, translated the Bible into English from its Latin, Greek and Hebrew versions, enabling more people to read and understand Scripture for themselves. Before then, religious teaching had been restricted to an elite group of learned men deemed to be ‘best qualified’ to decide how Scripture should be interpreted and explained to the majority.

The invention of the printing press dramatically increased access to information in books and pamphlets. In a similar way, the internet has democratised knowledge and the seeking of truth. When the printing and distribution of his Bible was banned in England, Tyndale travelled to Germany where a clandestine printer produced hundreds of pocket editions of his translated Bible. These were then smuggled into England. He was hunted across Europe and eventually captured in Antwerp, where he was executed by strangulation and then burned at the stake. Today, Tyndale should be remembered as one in a long line of Englishmen who stood up for freedom of conscience and the right to free speech.

Share Right Times with Kathy Gyngell

Christianity has a remarkably long association with the people of the British Isles. Folklore tells of Christ visiting England alongside his metal-trading uncle, Joseph of Arimathea. According to Orthodox tradition the first Bishop of Britain was Saint Aristobulus, one of the Seventy Apostles sent around the Roman Empire. He arrived in Britain shortly after the Roman invasion in AD 43. At this time, Christians who proclaimed their faith were persecuted by the authorities; nevertheless, they remained defiant and refused to stay silent about their beliefs. The early Church was characterised by cults built around local Romano-British martyrs, such as Saint Alban. Many of these saints have since been lost to the Anglican Church, but are still celebrated by the Orthodox Church.

Following the Roman withdrawal in AD 410, indigenous Romano-Britons were unable to prevent the widespread settlement of Anglo-Saxon pagans. Christianity was confined to the western and northern parts of the British Isles, and was introduced to the Anglo-Saxons in England in the early 7thcentury. Biblical principles and Christian moral guidance underpin English common law, which developed from a series of legal precedents taken from the wisdom, customs, and traditions of the Anglo-Saxons. For hundreds of years, this legal system has provided a defence of individual freedoms and rights.

The ‘Golden Rule’ in the Gospel of Luke ‘to do unto others as you would have them do to you’ is lost on many in the modern secular age. Unnecessarily abusive social media posts considered ‘hurtful’ are used as an excuse by authorities to clamp down on freedom of expression and speech. This has been helped by the English legal system moving away from flexible, common-sense case law and towards poorly defined statutory codes that are open to subjective interpretation by social media platform moderators and unelected judges.

Magna Carta was sealed by King John in 1215. Its principal author, Stephen Langton (Archbishop of Canterbury at the time), opposed the notion that monarchs could act above the law. He believed that morally upstanding citizens were a prerequisite for a just and prosperous Christian society. Individuals needed to operate with honour and integrity to find their true sense of spiritual and secular purpose. For this to happen they had to be free, and a system of law based on truth, fairness and transparency had to underpin these freedoms. If all people were treated were treated equally under the law, individual rights and freedoms would be respected across society. Today, this basic concept, the cornerstone of Western civilisation, is at risk from legally enforceable protected characteristics which have created a hierarchy of victimhood and ill-defined differentiation.

In the 14th century, English dissenters challenged the authority and corruption of the Catholic Church. The Lollards (a ‘proto-Protestant’ movement) included academics such as John Wycliffe (the first translator of the English Bible), and radical priests including John Ball (one of the leaders of the Peasants’ Revolt). Although many dissenting Lollards were hunted down by the authorities, their ideas never disappeared. Wycliffe’s work would later influence reformers such as Martin Luther. In the 16th century, a new Protestant theology based on a deep understanding of the Bible emerged in parts of Europe and in England.

Tensions between Catholicism and various strands of Protestantism existed at this time. Christian attitudes towards religious tolerance were influenced by the 17th century English philosopher John Locke, who argued for a separation of government and religion. This was based on a recognition that individuals could not be forced into a particular faith or way of thinking, as this only came with a genuine change of mind. Furthermore, while governments have powers to impose laws by force, they have no power to change what an individual believes to be true. The Toleration Act 1689 put much of this reasoning into law.

Western nations have since thrived in an atmosphere of tolerance, underpinned by the right to freedom of speech. For Christians, the role of nations is integral to God’s redemptive plan, and in the Gospel of Matthew there is reference to Jesus telling his disciples to ‘go and make disciples of all nations’. The new covenant in the New Testament is a promise from God that does not just apply to one specific group. Anyone in any nation who believes can be part of the covenant, and each nation should protect the right of every person to have a faith if they chose to.

Share Right Times with Kathy Gyngell

English missionaries spread Christianity across northern Europe during the early Middle Ages. In the 18th and 19th centuries, they took the Gospel message around the world, helping to end slavery, human sacrifice and widow-burning. English Christians developed a just legal system, reformed a corrupt Church, and introduced greater religious and political toleration. It is worrying that modern-day secular leaders fail to acknowledge our Christian heritage. The freedoms and liberties we enjoy today did not just arrive overnight. They have been fought for over many generations. While we remember the sacrifice made by William Tyndale some 500 years ago, we should also remember that it takes only one or two neglectful generations to erase a historic legacy that represents the pinnacle of human achievement.

Bob Robinson is the author of
Identity Lost, Identity Regained: The Story of England and the English People.

Thank you for reading and supporting us. Please

Political Prisoner Brad Love Released After 26 Days in Jail

Political Prisoner Released After 26 Days in Jail

EDMONTON. June 9, 2026. Today after a short court appearance, political prisoner Brad Love was released and told all charges would be dropped at a further court appearance in two weeks.

“I was scooped and spent 26 days in prison for nothing,” an angry Mr. Love told CAFE. He’d been arrested May 13 at his Fort McMurray residence, not allowed to get his pants or wallet or ID. He spent the first night in an RCMP cell in Fort McMurray without blankets on the concrete cell floor. Four days later he was transferred to Edmonton Remand Centre five hours away.

The charges were “breach of probation” for trespassing on some woman’s lawn and whacking a security camera with a stick. Mr. Love denied the charges and said bus transfers would prove he was elsewhere at the time of the alleged incidents. The RCMP who make a habit of harassing the outspoken free thinker slapped the handcuffs on anyway.

In court today, the Crown admitted that the video of the event confirmed that the whacker with a stick was not Mr. Love and a “witness” had recanted.

Fort McMurray is awash in drugs, Indian public drunkenness is a scandal and White tweekers, Indian drunks and numerous Third World newcomers fail to pay bus fare, but the local RCMP are fixated on Bad Love. After his arrest, they entered his dwelling, apparently, without a warrant and questioned his room mates as to whether Mr. Love made racial remarks. Whether he does or doesn’t is irrelevant to the bogus charges at issue.

Mr. Love described his release. He had $1,500 in his canteen — his money transferred by family members. The prison authorities would only hand over $500, the rest to come later. {How can they get away with this?] So, with no ID or credit card, Mr. Love had to find his way back to Fort McMurray. With no ID, he couldn’t board a plane. Finally, he persuaded a cab driver to accept $500, with the remaining $300 on arrival.

Of the 35 inmates released with Mr. Love, 25 were Indians. None had money. They were given bus passes to head downtown to the Indian Friendship Centre.

British Minister Convicted for Preaching Near Abortion Clinic

British Minister Convicted for Preaching Near Abortion Clinic

Pastor Clive Johnston has been convicted under the United Kingdom’s buffer zone laws after preaching near a hospital abortion facility.

According to reports, Johnston referenced John 3:16 during an outdoor Sunday service held within a restricted zone. Authorities argued the gathering violated laws designed to limit certain activities near abortion clinics.

“This is a dark day for Christian freedom,” Johnston said after the ruling. “The buffer zones law is so broad that holding a Sunday service has been found to be a criminal offence.”

The case is drawing concern from free speech and religious liberty advocates across the UK.

URSULA HAVERBECK, R.I.P.

I met Ursula Haverbeck in Germany. She was the epitome and grace and class. She was fearless in her pursuit of the truth. She reminds me of another German, who said: “Here I stand, I can do no other,” in defence of being true to one’s conscience. [In German, ““ Hier stehe ich. Ich kann nicht anders. Gott helfe mir. Amen.” ] Her imprisonment in old age shows the bankruptcy of the present German government and the heroic courage of this quiet grandmother. — Paul Fromm

Premier Danielle Smith describes threats to free speech and the marketplace of ideas

Premier Danielle Smith describes threats to free speech and the marketplace of ideas

Alberta free speech statement

Danielle Smith on X: “No professional should ever feel forced into silence or pressured into self-censorship by their regulatory body. That’s why Alberta’s government is stepping up to ensure professional regulators stick to what matters: competence, ethics, and public safety – not controlling

https://t.co/W7Ub6RP6F4″ / X

Elected P.E.I. Councillor Challenges Being Suspended and Fined From Elected Job for A Sign Critical of Residential School Hysteria

.

Elected P.E.I. Councillor Challenges Being Suspended and Fined From Elected Job for A Sign Critical of Residential School Hysteria
Voters’ choice is under attack by woke elected bodies. It’s happened to at least two school trustees in Ontario and others in Alberta and Manitoba. The elected official makes a statement the leftists on council or the school  board don’t like and they suspend him, thus denying the voters the services of the person THEY hired. Only the voters, at the next election, should be able to dismiss an elected official. The latest example is Murray Harbour Councillor John Robertson in P.E.I. The Canadian Press (February 23, 2024) reports: “Between late September and early October last year, coinciding with the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, the councillor displayed a sign on his property with the message, “Truth: mass grave hoax” and “Reconciliation: Redeem Sir John A.’s integrity.”  The thought police on council nuked him. “The councillors then decided to impose a $500 fine and suspend him from his municipal post for six months. Robertson, elected in November 2022, was also removed as chair of the maintenance committee and ordered to write an apology to the mayor, council and the Indigenous community.” To his credit, Councillor Robertson has taken the matter to court and is seeking judicial review, arguing that the other councillors’ actions infringed on his right to freedom of speech, expression and belief. — Paul Fromm

P.E.I. councillor punished for posting sign questioning Indigenous unmarked graves seeks judicial review

Murray Harbour Coun. John Robertson claims fellow councillors exceeded their authority and violated his Charter rights by fining and suspending him

Author of the article:The Canadian Press

The Canadian Press

Michael MacDonald

Published Feb 23, 2024  •  3 minute read

210 Comments

The former Kamloops Indian Residential School.A makeshift memorial is seen outside the former Kamloops Indian Residential School in Kamloops, B.C., after the possible discovery of 215 unmarked graves on the property in May 2021.Photo by Cole Burston/AFP via Getty Images/File

CHARLOTTETOWN — A village councillor in Prince Edward Island is asking a court to quash sanctions imposed on him after he displayed a sign on his property questioning the existence of unmarked graves at former residential schools.

In documents filed last week with the P.E.I. Supreme Court, Murray Harbour Coun. John Robertson claims fellow councillors exceeded their authority and violated his rights on Nov. 18, 2023, when they decided he had breached the council’s code of conduct.

The councillors then decided to impose a $500 fine and suspend him from his municipal post for six months. Robertson, elected in November 2022, was also removed as chair of the maintenance committee and ordered to write an apology to the mayor, council and the Indigenous community.

The councillor’s application for judicial review, dated Feb. 16, says those sanctions were unreasonable because they failed to account for his fundamental rights to freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, as guaranteed by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Robertson argues that he shouldn’t be punished for stating personal opinions that have nothing to do with his role as an elected member of council.

Between late September and early October last year, coinciding with the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, the councillor displayed a sign on his property with the message, “Truth: mass grave hoax” and “Reconciliation: Redeem Sir John A.’s integrity.”

Macdonald, Canada’s first prime minister, is considered an architect of the residential school system because he championed policies of assimilation and violence toward Indigenous people.

In May 2021, the Tk’emlups te Secwepemc First Nation announced that ground-penetrating radar had revealed the possible remains of as many as 215 children around the former Kamloops Indian Residential School in British Columbia’s interior. Since then, many other First Nations across Canada have searched for unmarked graves at school sites in their territories.Recommended from Editorial

“The subject of Mr. Robertson’s impugned statements included questioning the reliability of news reports of a political nature and providing an opinion respecting a political figure and did not relate to any function undertaken by Mr. Robertson as a member of council,” the application says, arguing the other councillors employed an “overboard interpretation” of the code of conduct.

The document says Robertson has resisted requests to resign, “asserting that the expression of his personal opinions on political topics were not properly the subject of the council’s oversight.” Terry White, mayor of Murray Harbour, population 282, could not be reached for comment Friday.