Your Truth and My Truth Professor Frei! – Ursula Haverbeck

Your Truth and My Truth Professor Frei! – Ursula Haverbeck

***

Reposted from Henry Hafenmayer

July 31, 2018

The following letter from Ursula Haverbeck, unfortunately, reached me only today. However, I do not wish to keep it from the public. A contribution to this case has already been made here [in German].

 

 

Frau Ursula Haverbeck

From Prison

July 31, 2018

Yours and My Truth

An article about me [Ursula Haverbeck] was published in the Süddeutsche Zeitung under the title ‘Hitlerliebe’ (Hitler Love) on July 21/22, 2018 by a historian, teaching newer and more recent history partly in Jena, partly in Israel. [admin: The Professor is a Jew.]

Professor Norbert Frei begins with the sentence:

“Ursula was 16 years old when Hitler committed suicide.”

He should have written:

“Ursula was 16 years old” when… the war, that was already drawing to an end, caught up with the people who had so far been largely spared in the East. After the total expulsion order, thousands of banished Germans set out to save themselves before the borders of the Bolshevik Red Army. That was the end of childhood and a very happy youth.

Prussians, Pomeranians, Silesians, Sudeten Germans and many other ethnic German groups could never return again to their old ancestral homeland, something that many still expected decades after the war, due to international law.

It was a bitter-cold January in 1945, the roads were frozen with ice. Often narrowly squeezed into three lanes, [German] troops headed east, and the farm buggies headed west, and in between them there were repeated transports of wounded. For the displaced Germans on the carriages, there was only one goal, despite the approaching gunfire, to get to Breslau and across the bridges of the river Oder as soon as possible, before they would be blown up.”

That would have said more about the reality of a sixteen-year-old girl’s life in East Germany in 1945.

Of course, a historian is also free to imagine a young person from the Nazi era at his own discretion. However, this usually says more about the mental condition of him than about the person described.

With the currency reform of 1948, a hard and serious cut into life began, especially for the homeless and unemployed expellees in foreign surroundings, where the inhabitants were already overwhelmed by the hundreds of thousands of people bombed out of their homes. All living space was already occupied well into the 1950s.

In England and Sweden they were looking for cleaning ladies for the hospitals and in positions of domestic help. I became a guest worker in Sweden from 1949 to 1953, from where I could support my parents.

The former “BDM” girl [Frau Haverbeck was designated by Prof. Frei to be a Hitler Youth Girl] – to which I never belonged; I had stayed with the 10-14 year olds as a young girls’ leader – was neither stubborn, nor angry, nor unhappy, as Norbert Frei claims I, his study object, was. I had a particularly happy time in Sweden. We met once a week in a German-Swedish working group for more than two years to study Rudolf Steiner’s ‘Philosophy of Freedom’. We read it in German and alternately lectured and discussed it in Swedish. There I heard of Baruch de Spinoza. Three of his sentences became my guide posts:

From the ethics: “Deus sive natura, ‘the unity and wholeness of God – nature.

“Man is man’s joy” as a replacement for the old Roman quote “man is man’s wolf.”

And from the theological-political treatise: “The true goal of all politics is freedom.”

The philosopher, who was a close friend of the Dutch politician Jan de Witt, recognized this as the basic maxim for the new political design after the collapse of the Spanish foreign rule, already shortly after the Thirty Year War at that time. It was to also point the way ahead for our departure. Freedom, please, not ego-liberalism!

The ‘Holocaust’ did not exist yet, and not in Sweden nor in Scotland in 1957 either, where I was able to study for a year thanks to a scholarship.

Tales of horror at Auschwitz did not attract further attention under the terror of the bombs and the misery of the displaced people, that was still omnipresent. Furthermore, there was also a large number of opposing statements about Auschwitz by contemporary witnesses, from personal experience. What was truth – what was a lie?

And not to forget, we knew who had already ‘declared’ war on us in March of 1933, and who it was that six months later declared the ‘Holy War’ against the most “bloodthirsty, evil people in the world, the Germans.” That wasn’t a new tune. Our fathers had already heard it in World War One.

“Denying the Holocaust is not an opinion, but a crime,” concludes Norbert Frei. For us, ‘The Holocaust’ was a Hollywood feature film from the USA. So this word first came into our consciousness in 1979. It was an enormous production, in four episodes in succession, with scientific introduction, panel discussion and tearful reports by Auschwitz survivors.

Auschwitz, the Holocaust and the six million gassings were one and the same. From now on it was regarded as the singular guilt of the Germans, that was not atonable for all eternity.

All refutations from available documents and scientific views were indexed, forbidden, destroyed. It was punishable to cite them in agreement, whether submitted by Jews, French, Americans or Germans.

Those born after 1960-1965 no longer had an opportunity to compare the information. For them, the Holocaust became an incontrovertible fact. And even today, every criticism, every question that is difficult to answer is punished with prohibitions and prison sentences. May I remind you of the trials against Ernst Zündel and the chemist Germar Rudolf in Mannheim.

The Institut für Zeitgeschichte (IfZ) [Institute of Contemporary History] managed the feat of publishing the Standort- und Kommandanturbefehle Auschwitz 1940-45 ohne IfZ Bemerkungen-530S in 2000, [commander’s orders at Auschwitz] and still withheld them at the same time from the public. In none of the more than 30 lawsuits [I have attended], have I ever heard them mentioned. (2001 – 2015).

Norbert Frei is made “speechless” by the “brazenness” of Ursula Haverbeck. This is simply explained by the fact that she knows not only the time after the Holocaust film, but also the 35 years before it, as well as a number of the critics involved, personally. [The accusations] have been reviewed retrospectively.

“The real goal of politics is freedom.” But how do you get freedom? This we find in John’s Gospel:

“The truth will set you free” (John 8:32).

Ursula Haverbeck, July 31, 2018

“https://endederluege.blog/2018/08/31/ursula-haverbeck-deine-und-meine-wahrheit/

Short version:

Nazi Commands at Auschwitz 1940 to 1945 SS Archive Data Revealed-053018-65pg

To purchase: Nazi Commands at Autschwitz

Long Version, so far in German only:

Darstellungen und Quellen zur Geschichte Auschwitz-ohne IfZ Bemerkungen (Kommandanturbefehle)-530S

This entry was posted in Holocausts und Holohoax, Ursula Haverbeck. Bookmark the permalink.

GERMAN POLICE SHUT DOWN DRESDEN MEMORIAL AS LADY MICHELE RENOUF UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR HER SPEECH THERE DRESDEN,

GERMAN POLICE SHUT DOWN DRESDEN MEMORIAL AS LADY MICHELE RENOUF UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR HER SPEECH THERE
 
DRESDEN, January 17, 2018. You may have thought that Germans, especially in the East, regained their freedom when the Wall came down in 1989. Nothing could be further from the truth. Communist secret police and censorship were replaced with anti-free speech laws and the grip of Cultural Marxism and the fanatical new religion of holocaust, a state religion which treats any deviations from its dogmas as heresy with the heretic deserving of fines and jail. That is why Canadian Monika Schaefer is now in prison since she was snatched attending lawyer Silvia Stolz free speech trial in Munich, January 3.
Today, German nationalists and supporters converged on Dresden for the annual commemoration of the Allied bombing of this non-military target on February 13-14, 1945. Estimates range up to 500,000 as the number of civilians blown up, buried, burned to a crisp, vapourized by terror bombing or machinegunned by strafing fighters over a three day period.
One of the major speakers was Lady Michele Renouf of Britain. Part way through her speech, because she obliquely questioned the new religion of holocaust by saying the only people holocausted in Europe were the Germans (especially in the firebombing of cities like Dresden and Hamburg), the police shut the rally down.
Alfred Schaefer reports: ” They shut us down as Lady Michele Renouf was talking because she had quoted the desire of the controlled British government to baste 900,000 Germans in Dresden, just like one bastes a duck in the oven. They fell short of the 900,000 and had to accept the basted 500,000 Germans.   Any deviation from the official “deserved deaths of 25,000 Nazis” is punishable by imprisonment and called incitement to hatred. It is not legal for Germans to mourn their basted ancestors.  It is mandatory that they crawl on their stomachs because of the six million lampshades that they made from those poor poor Jews after they gassed them. Any questioning this is also punishable by prison. That is, of course, why Monika is now serving her proper and just prison term. She should not have apologized to her mom.”
The Sydney Morning Herald (February 19, 2018) reported: “German police are investigating an Australian-born British woman for suspected incitement after she questioned the Holocaust during a far-right protest in the eastern city of Dresden. A spokeswoman for Dresden police says Michele Renouf was one of two people being investigated for remarks made at the … i rally on Saturday commemorating those killed in the 1945 Allied bombing of the city.

Videos of the rally posted online show Renouf saying the only Holocaust perpetrated in Europe was against German civilians. Publicly denying the … murder of an estimated six million Jews is a criminal offence in Germany.

Dresden police spokeswoman Jana Ulbricht said on Sunday that officers ordered the rally dissolved after determining that two speakers had broken the law.

Short Video Memorial for Political Prisoner Ernst Zundel

Short Video Memorial for  Political Prisoner Ernst Zundel
https://youtu.be/Y_dF8OUylWM
Ernst Zündel starb im Alter von 78 Jahren am 5. Auguts 2017 in seinem Elternhaus in Calmbach/Bad Wildbad Schwarzwald/Deutschland. Zum Gedenken an diesen auße…
YOUTUBE.COM

https://youtu.be/Y_dF8OUylWM

Anti-White Activists Target, Seek to Censor Billy Roper’s books

Anti-White Activists Target, Seek to Censor Billy Roper’s books

In a clear indication of who will be burning the books this time, anti-White activists and their Communist, Anarchist, and LGBT allies have teamed up to lobby Amazon to remove all books by author Billy Roper. This is a follow up to the recent Jewish (successful) attempts to have books discussing the history of the Holocaust or the Second World War removed by Amazon, as well.

At the moment, anti-Whites are placing dozens of false book reviews on Amazon, in order to lower the rankings of such books as ‘The Big Picture’, as can be seen here.

Even if they are successful in having Amazon remove Billy Roper’s books, however, they have all already been republished through a different publisher, so they will remain available independently through Racial Observer Books.

Anti-Whites have also publicly announced that they are lobbying their local libraries to not carry books by Billy Roper.

There are three ways that supporters of free speech can counter this deceitful, dishonest censorship.

  1. Purchase a copy of ‘The Big Picture’ and other books by Billy Roper, to demonstrate to the retailer that their bottom line interest is in continuing to carry his books, as well as to make sure that you get a copy before further censorship efforts are carried out more successfully. This also supports the author under attack and lets them know that they are not carrying on the fight for truth alone.

2. Place a positive review of ‘The Big Picture‘ and other books by Billy Roper in the comments section for reviews at Amazon and elsewhere, to counterweight the false negative reviews.

3. Use your copy of Billy Roper’s books to slap an anti-White liberal in the face. Hard. On both sides. Repeatedly.

AMAZON JOINS THE CENSORSHIP CABAL ON THE URGINGS OF YAD VASHEM RABBIS

AMAZON JOINS THE CENSORSHIP CABAL ON THE URGINGS OF YAD VASHEM RABBIS
Book sellers and those who deal with literature would be among the foremost proponents of free speech and open discussion and sworn enemies of censorshipÉ RightÉ You`d think. Sadly,the huge U.S. book selling conglomerate Amazon now seems to be censoring books critical of the new religion of holocaust. As so often happens, the main instigators of this censorship are the Jewish lobby, especially rabbis at the shrine of Yad Vashem.
 
Until the West finds its testicles and starts to say `NO` to this bossy and malignant lobby, we shall continue to lose our freedoms. But let`s never be in any doubt who are the major agents of censorship and thought control!
March 8, 2017
Amazon bans World War II revisionist books
By Michael Hoffman
We have just learned that Amazon, the huge, Seattle-based online book distributor has removed from sale books by Dr. Arthur R. Butz, Carlo Mattogno and other eminent dissident scholars who have dared to ask scientific and technical questions about the alleged operation of homicidal gas chambers in Auschwitz. These heretics have trespassed on the sacred liturgy of Holocaustianity and their books must be forbidden to preserve the holiness of World War II dogma.
Amazon has been selling these and similar books for years, but in the past 20 months rabbis and the Yad Vashem “Holocaust” museum have pressured Amazon to remove these and cognate titles. Moreover, Amazon’s owner, Jeff Bezos purchased the Washington Post and fashioned it into a beachhead of Left wing orthodoxy which may have politicized and neutralized his formerly Libertarian instincts.
Books advocating Satanism and sodomy, and denying the Allied holocaust against German civilians, and the Israeli holocaust against the Palestinians, continue to be sold by Amazon.
The censorship is conducted under the rubric of “fighting hatred” and “combatting anti-Semitism.” But this is just special pleading. Books evincing hatred for Germans, Arabs, Iranians and white southern “deplorables” are all on offer at Amazon, as are books denying that Jesus Christ rose from the dead. So it all depends on whose ox is being gored. As many of you know, there’s one sacred cow that is more equal than others. His name is the Golden Calf.
Michael Hoffman is the author of The Great Holocaust Trial: The Landmark Battle for the Right to Doubt the West’s Most Sacred Relic
Postscript: Some of Dr. Robert Faurisson’s doubting-Thomas volumes—for some reason —remain for sale at Amazon. Perhaps the inquisitors have not found the time to remove them (yet).
__________________
http://codoh.com/library/document/4266/
Castle Hill Publishers, 8 March 2017
Amazon turns into the main enemy of free speech: mass-ban of books about anything the Jewish lobby doesn’t like: Holocaust revisionism, WWII revisionism, WWII memorabilia, criticism of Jewish power and influence…

Amazon Mass-Bans Dissident Materials

Hundreds of Titles Erased within a Day

On February 23rd, 2017, the world’s media started spreading the news that Israel’s government-sponsored Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial Center started putting Amazon under pressure to remove any and all material that questions the orthodox Holocaust narrative. […]
We at Castle Hill Publishers were holding our breaths. Amazon had been criticized by the media many times before for allowing the sale of controversial material on their website, but they never censored anything that was legal. So at first, nothing happened. But then, as if ordered to emphasize the urgency of Yad Vashem’s request, two Jewish cemeteries were vandalized,  […]
Then, on the first workday of the week following the second (false) cemetery story, on March 6, 2017 at 6:39 pm, we received the following email from Amazon’s EBook Subsidiary Amazon KDP, that is to say, Kindle:
Hello,
We’re contacting you regarding the following book:
Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of ‘Truth’ and ‘Memory’ (Holocaust Handbooks Book 1) (ID 5513183)

[…69 more books omitted here]

During our review process, we found that this content is in violation of our content guidelines. As a result, we cannot offer this book for sale. If we identify additional submissions with similar content that violates our guidelines you may lose access to optional KDP services and/or face account level actions up to and including termination.
To learn more about our content guidelines, please visit our Kindle Direct Publishing Help page at:
Best Regards,
Amazon.com
Note that none of the IDs given by them are Amazon Kindle ASIN numbers nor anything else we can identify. Anyway, a day later, they added two more books to that list  […]
Early in the morning of that same day, we also checked the status of all the books we have in our account with CreateSpace, Amazon’s print-on-demand subsidiary. All were still listed and enrolled in all Amazon retail sales outlets. We had received no message whatsoever from CreateSpace, but when checking the U.S. and UK Amazon websites, the result was mind-boggling. In the following table, the titles of the books (some abbreviated) have links leading to a website which lists online stores offering the book for sale. The links in the two right-hand columns go to the Amazon stores as indicated. Until March 5, 2017, these links all went smoothly to that book’s dedicated sales page on Amazon.com and Amazon.co.uk. Since March 6, however, they are all dead…
Books by Castle Hill Publishers, Online Availability as of March 8, 2017
Title ISBN Amazon USA Amazon UK
The Hoax of the Twentieth… 1591480795 Amazon USA Amazon UK
Auschwitz 1591480744 Amazon USA Amazon UK
[66 more books omitted…]
The sweeping mass ban enforced within hours, and the senseless aimlessness and random nature with which it was implemented, clearly show that these books were not pulled because their content was checked and found impermissible, but because someone (probably Yad Vashem) had sent them a list of items to ban, and Amazon simply complied by checking off all the items on that list.
And here are the Jews gloating over their victory:
Amazon UK has removed four [!?!] books from sale which question or deny the Holocaust, following discussions with the Board of Deputies. […]
After the apparent U-turn, Van der Zyl added: “Should any member of the public find further offending works, please get in contact with us and we will report them using the appropriate channels.”
Four books? (The Jewish Chronicle even wrote about only three books.) So far, Castle Hill Publishers alone has had 68 print books removed and 72 Kindle books.
Then read the last sentence: After their success, the Jews are already eager to censor more books. And guess what? It is happening. As I type this, books not aligned with the orthodox narrative of the Second World War in general are being banned, and books which are not all-out negative about that war, like any book reporting in a neutral fashion about Axis personalities, weapons, organizations. Books critical of Jewish influence and power are in their crosshairs as well.
We are talking about thousands of books being massacred! Here is a list of Kindle book ASINs banned from the account of just one other book dealer specializing on books about World War II. These are 727 titles! Want to see what they were? You can’t. They’re censored, for your own good.
Or someone else’s …
  1. 0898705614
  2. B005T3IS6G
  3. 0029351901
  4. [… 724 more AISNs omitted]
George Orwell’s Animal Farm has not yet been deleted, which is a good thing, because it contains a line we will be needing to learn. “Four legs good, two legs bad.”
Repeat this many times every hour. We will be needing such thinking more and more as we venture forth into this new world, in which our books, and soon enough our thoughts themselves, will be censored and cleansed to the total satisfaction of our masters.
Holocaust good, revisionism bad. Holocaust good …
Castle Hill Publishers | CastleHillPublishers@comcast.net |  https://shop.codoh.com

Jim Rizoli Interviews Vincent Reynouard, Sept 2016, French Political Prisoner & Revisionist

Jim Rizoli Interviews Vincent Reynouard, Sept 2016, French Political Prisoner & Revisionist


VINCENT REYNOUARD WEBSITE

http://archive.org/details/@didi18?tab=uploads&sort=-date&and[]=reynouard

http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Oradour-sur-Glane/Story/VincentReynouard.html

Vincent Reynouard is a French revisionist who disputes the official version of the massacre at Oradour-sur-Glane. On 9 June 2004, his previous conviction on a charge of “approval of a war crime” was upheld on appeal and Reynouard was sentenced to two years in prison with 18 months of that time on probation, plus a 3,000 Euro fine. The court also upheld the confiscation of his research papers which had been seized in May 2001. Essentially, Reynouard’s crime was that he claimed that survivors of the Oradour massacre lied about the tragedy, and that the women and children were killed by an explosion in the church which was not set off by the Waffen-SS soldiers who were in the village that day. Contrary to Reynouard’s revisionist claims, the women and children were burned alive by a fire that was set in the church by the Waffen-SS soldiers, according to the official story. Reynouard wrote an article which was published in German on this web site, which has since been taken down: http://www.deutsche-stimme.com/Ausgaben2004/Sites/10-04-Oradour.html 

http://revisionists.com/revisionists/reynouard.html

Vincent Reynouard is an independent French historian specializing in the Second World War who has been punished repeatedly for violating France’s controversial “Gayssot” law, which criminalizes dissident views on certain aspects of twentieth century history.  For more by and about him, see the French-language website: http://www.phdnm.org/ , and http://sansconcessiontv.org/phdnm/

Born in 1969, Reynouard studied in Caen, Normandy, and graduated as a chemical engineer. He then taught mathematics at professional secondary schools. In 1997 he was dismissed as a teacher by the French Education Minister after the discovery of revisionist texts on the hard disk of the computer he used at school. Since then Reynouard has survived on his writings, videos and other work as an independent historian.

BRUSHES WITH THE LAW

On October 8, 1992, a court in Caen, France, sentenced him to one month in prison (suspended), and fined him 5000 francs (about $850) for violating the country’s “Gayssot” law that makes it a crime to “contest” or dispute certain “crimes against humanity,” as defined by the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal (IMT) of 1945-46. Specifically, he was punished for having sent to 24 secondary school pupils anonymous letters along with copies of writings that dispute claims of gas chamber killings during World War II.  In June 2004 Reynouard was sentenced to two years in prison for having produced and distributed a video on the tragedy of Oradour-sur-Glane that allegedly approved war crimes. However that ruling was later overturned by another court. An earlier confiscation of his research papers was validated.

On November 8, 2007, a court in Saverne (Lower Rhine), France, sentenced Reynouard to one year in prison, and to pay a fine of 10,000 euros (about $13,000) for “contesting crimes against humanity” by writing and distributing a 16-page brochure entitled “The Holocaust: What They Hide from You.” He was also ordered to pay 3,000 euros to the anti-racist association LICRA. His incarceration attracted public attention, and hundreds signed a petition to press for his release and the repeal of the French “denial” law.

On June 25, 2008, the Court of Appeals in Colmar (Alsace) upheld the one-year prison sentence and ordered Reynouard to pay a total of 60,000 euros, which included a fine of 20,000 euros, damages, and the cost of publishing a notice with extracts from this judgment in the “Official Journal of the French Republic,” as well as in two French daily newspapers. Meanwhile, Reynouard fled with his family to neighboring Belgium.

In June 2008, a court in Brussels, Belgium, declared Reynouard and Belgian VHO publisher Siegfried Verbeke guilty of “disputing crimes against humanity” for having written and published “Holocaust denial” literature. The two men were sentenced to one year imprisonment and to pay a fine of 25,000 euros, as well as damages and various other costs. In 2011 an appeals court upheld the sentence.

In February 2015, a criminal court in Normandy sentenced Reynouard to two years in prison for “Holocaust denial” (or négationnisme) in videos he had posted on social media. In addition, the French court ordered him to pay 4,500 euros in damages. Reynouard had represented himself in the three-hour trial in the city of Coutances, although he was not present for the verdict. This sentence came in the aftermath of emphatic expressions of support for freedom of speech — by politicians, in the media and in large rallies — following the killing by Muslim extremists of staff members of the French satirical weekly Charlie Hebdo, which had enraged Muslims for its demeaning cartoons of Muhammed. The sentence of Reynouard showed, once again, that in France there are very real limits on freedom of speech – restrictions that reflect the outlook and interests of those who have power and influence.

Reynouard has written (Used on the Interview video with Jim Rizoli)

“Historical revisionism belongs to no one. Its findings are the fruit of traditional methods of inquiry where scientific expertise assists in the appraisal of testimonies and in documentary research. They will be obvious to any honest individual, whether on the political left or right, [religious] believer or atheist …

“… Its implications extend well beyond the historical scope. The stakes involved, gigantic ones, are political and even theological. If some refuse to see this – because of blindness, cowardice or mistaken strategy – our adversaries, for their part, have understood quite well. They know that a sudden bursting through of the historical truth about the period 1914-1946 would call into question the world order founded at Nuremberg in 1945-1946 …

“The way ahead, therefore, is all laid out for us: we must continue to repeat the truth, the whole truth, including the truth about what’s at stake in this struggle. Far from being merely a sterile quarrel between devotees of the past cut off from present-day realities, the fight for historical truth is, on the contrary, the continuation, on the intellectual level, of the war whose armed phase ended in 1945 with the defeat of the Axis forces. And it’s clear that this conflict, having begun not on September 3, 1939, but on January 30, 1933, is the modern form of the eternal struggle between Light and Darkness. In the twentieth century, National Socialist Germany embodied – doubtless imperfectly but successfully all the same – the very last attempt to return to a well-ordered society, that is, a society respecting the natural order.

“This is the reason why, even after the Third Reich was completely crushed militarily, the war continued, and has continued up to today. Our opponents in this never-ending fight have a weapon of mass destruction: the alleged ‘Holocaust.’ Since 1945, this lie has prevented any dispassionate debate on National Socialism and, more generally, on societies that respect natural order. ‘We know where that led! …’ is how people constantly respond to those who, against the ‘Rights of Man’ and their natural offspring: the unleashing of all selfish inclinations, dare speak of order, the Common Good, wholesomeness, moral standards, safeguarding the genetic heritage, the birth rate, rights of kinship …

“The German homicidal gas chambers never existed. Yes, ‘the Holocaust’ is a myth. For my part, I add: Yes, Hitler embodied the hope of Europe in the face of the ruinous ideals of 1789; Yes, we must take up the best of what National Socialism comprised in order finally to surpass it and forge a doctrine that will be able to save our Old Continent.”

JIM RIZOLI:  Cofounder, producer/interviewer (Fred Leuchter and Assistant, Diane King) of the Series, LEAGUE OF EXTRAORDINARY REVISIONISTS.  This also entails seeking out UNSUNG HEROES and German survivors of Allied atrocities – The German Story, The German Way.  Hard core historical revisionist, Jim and, his brother, Joe moved from combating the illegal immigrant hordes in their cable shows to dealing with the fundamental and pervading issue of the holocaust. Their immigrant battles led them to the plight of Ernst Zundel in Canada, being prosecuted for having reprinted *Did 6 Million Really Die*! Thus Jim and Joe’s efforts and cable shows also turned toward the issue of the holocaust.  That’s when their troubles accelerated. In 2002 – 2003 they began producing numerous (1000s of videos) dealing with many issues and 100s of videos about the holocaust. Consequently, YouTube videos (700) under the name of Jim Rizoli were banned. His name was banned on Facebook. In 2010, their cable shows were suspended. They returned and then were permanently removed in 2014. We are back to provide a venue of/freedom of, telling the story for tried-and-true revisionists and Germans throughout North America, Europe and Australia.

Attachments area
Preview YouTube video Jim Rizoli’s Interview with Vincent Reynouard, Sept 2016

Jim Rizoli’s Interview with Vincent Reynouard, Sept 2016

Monika Schaefer Denied A Busking Permit Because of Her ‘Non-inclusive” Ideas

Monika Schaefer Denied A Busking Permit Because of Her ‘Non-inclusive” Ideas
 
Don’t worry if you missed the witch hunts of the 17th century, you can catch the same type of intolerant hysteria in Alberta this summer.. Move over, Salem, Massachusetts, there’s a new witch hunting hotbed and that’s Jasper, Alberta.
 
Don’t be fooled by all the politically correct prattle about cherishing “diversity” and “inclusiveness”. That inclusiveness does not extend to diversity of opinion.
 
Back in June environmentalist and violin teacher Monika Schaefer posted a You Tube  —  https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=E0_BZphQ7Qo&feature=youtu.be. apologizing to her parents, now deceased, for having berated them, as a teenager, for not having done something to stop the so-called holocaust. They explained they had not known about it. In 2014, this inquiring, freethinker came to realize that the story hammered into Europeans by 71 years of relentless propaganda was substantially false. The video has gone viral, with over 70,000 hits. However, repression was swift to follow.
 
Miss Schaefer had lobbied town council to permit busking — musicians playing music — saxophone, guitar, banjo, or, in her case, violin — on public sidewalks and inviting contributions from passersby. This Spring council agreed. Hers was the first application and, on July 23, she received a stunning rejection from one Dave Baker, Director of Habitat for the Arts.
 
“We have considered your application for a busking permit in Jasper. In light of your recently publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs we have decided to decline a permit to you at this time….Please see the attached Values and Principles statement.” 
 
One struggles to grasp Baker’s meaning.. Yes, one understands he doesn’t like Monika’s views. But what do her views on WW II have to do with her playing the violin. She has frequently volunteered for benefits and has been a generous and giving member of the Jasper community for 35 years. “Non-inclusive views” — what does that mean? Almost any opinion is non-inclusive: if you support the Blue Jays, you reject the Yankees and the Orioles. If you are pro-Conservative, you reject the Liberals and the NDP. Perhaps, actions may be inclusive. Monika will play for ALL passersby. In fact, she is inclusive.
 

Miss Baker recalls: “As soon as I left the call, I found the offending email in my inbox from the “Habitat for the Arts” in which they told me that because of my “publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs”, they declined my request for a busking license. So my spidy senses from the encounter the day before had been correct. Irony of ironies, not only because I was at the forefront of getting busking to be legal in Jasper, but also because I have been playing my violin in this town for decades, donating my time and music to countless fundraisers, community functions, old-age home, hospital, you name it, I have donated my music to them. Now that I speak in a way that they deem politically incorrect, I cannot go busking, just when it is finally permitted! It is also important to note that I have NEVER used my “violin stage” as a “soap box” to pontificate about political issues. Never. Sometimes I think I should have, but I didn’t.

Parks Canada has been hosting a little music/culture event twice a week open to everybody, tourist and local alike, right downtown in the old  firehall space. A close friend of mine, Marie-Helene is the host. She invited me to participate and so I have been doing that. I was really happy to do it, just to make a point that I am still playing and volunteering, showing my face in public, and of course all the tourists love it. Already last week Marie-Helene told me that Parks had a complaint about me being there and the complainant declared that they should not let me participate. Marie-Helene told me that she had firmly insisted with her boss that she was taking 100% responsibility for me being there, and her boss agreed, they could not stop me from being there. 

Well, today I got the call from the boss, and she told me that a certain person (who remains anonymous) was threatening a protest at the event if I was there, so the boss told me that now it is all about the program, they don’t want to have a spoiled program. I agreed not to attend this week, but I made no promises for future events. I said I needed to think. Again, this is small town, and the stress right now is big.” 

 
Many Canadians, including CAFE fired off e-mails to Mr. Baker urging him to get off the witch-hunt band wagon and reconsider his thought control banning of Monika.
 
Inline image 1
 
However, Baker continues to want to silence Miss Schaefer. She explains:
 

Dear Dave,

Thank you very much for showing me yesterday exactly where you stand on the issue of my busking permit. Before having finally seen you face-to-face for the first time this summer, I had given you the benefit of the doubt. I believed that surely someone else is whispering in your ear, giving you direction. I believed that, because I did not recognize the Dave Baker that I have known since many years, in the curt email which you sent on 23rd July 2016, quoted here:

“We have considered your application for a busking permit in Jasper. In light of your recently publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs we have decided to decline a permit to you at this time….Please see the attached Values and Principles statement.” 

The hostility with which you treated me yesterday, at the “soft opening” of the new library-and-arts facility, gave me quite a clear picture. It became much more obvious to me that it must indeed be you who has made the decision to arbitrarily deny me a busking permit. Your attitude was belligerent and quite frankly, cowardly.

 “You – already – have – the – only – answer – that – you – will – get.” 

Screen Shot 2016-08-07 at 3.31.00 PM

You and I have been generous with each other and with the community in the countless endeavours that we have participated in and shared over the years. Is that all forgotten? It seems you have left your humanity behind.

You have designated yourself judge, jury, prosecutor, and enforcer all at once, on a spurious assumption that I am guilty of a crime, when in fact I am acting in good conscience to rectify past wrongs. My actions are based on my new understanding that the Hollywood version of history we have been taught is indeed full of factual errors.

You made it perfectly clear that answers are not forthcoming to my two questions which I asked in my email of August 1st quoted here:

“There has been a stunning silence from you since the cursory email you sent me on July 23rd, 2016 … I am wondering who you are accountable to, and who the “we” refers to in your (original) message to me. These are two very important questions and I expect that you will be forthcoming with an answer to these…. Monika”

I asked those questions again yesterday, peacefully and in person, and you repeatedly told me “I will not discuss this here, I will not discuss this now. This is a sacred place.” So I asked when and where? When would the answers be coming? Could we set up a meeting please? You then told me point blank “You – already – have – the – only – answer – that – you – will – get.” 

I see… final judgement has been made, and the proverbial jail key has been tossed out.

My first question was about accountability. I received a partial answer from the cover of this week’s Fitzhugh newspaper. The caption under the front-page picture of happy buskers says “Music in the Streets… thanks to a new pilot-project between the municipality and Habitat for the Arts.” For that reason I am sending this to all the town councillors and mayor, as they have a role to play in this. Are they also playing the role of thought police?

The Habitat “Values and Principles” statement is very good. The second paragraph follows (emphases mine), to show the absurdity of your accusation of “non-inclusive beliefs” against me. I contend it is you who is being non-inclusive.

We believe that learning never stops
We know it enhances social inclusion, active citizenship and personal development. 
We embrace new challenges and ideas.
We welcome new methods and change. 
We help each other grow through knowledge exchange and support.

Dave Baker, since you do not want to talk with me, then you simply become part of the wider story. My ‘bcc’ list is growing ever larger, as more and more people from around the world are taking an interest in this story. It is beginning to look like this pretty little town in a National Park and a World Heritage Site is becoming a leader in the totalitarian anti-free-speech direction that Canada is taking.

 

Sincerely,
Monika Schaefer