Monthly Archives: February 2021

Canadian Nationalist Party Leader Travis Patron Demands CBC Uphold Journalistic Mandate of Fairness

Posted on by

Patron Demands CBC Uphold Journalistic Mandate

Our public media broadcaster is no longer acting in the public interest. Back to Blog

12

Feb 2021 Patron Demands CBC Uphold Journalistic Mandate Our public media broadcaster is no longer acting in the public interest. Canadian Nationalist Party Activism

Canadian Nationalist Party Leader Travis Patron visited the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Headquarters in Saskatchewan on Friday to demand they uphold their journalistic mandate after completely neglecting coverage of their claim that the Government Of Canada has failed to uphold the democratic mandate.

The Canadian Nationalist Party was unconstitutionally excluded from the most recent 43rd Federal Election after requesting and being denied (ubiquitously and without exception) the liberty of hosting a public event and communicating their policies to voters after the issue of the writ (September 11th – October 21st, 2019). Not a single request made was honoured.

We maintain that this represents a failure of the Government Of Canada to uphold their democratic mandate.

In the resulting constitution lawsuit before the Court Of Queen’s Bench For Saskatchewan, the Court has ordered that Patron is not allowed to represent the federally-sanctioned political party he founded and continues to lead. The Judge has ordered that until someone other than Patron is appointed to represent his party, no further action can take place, and that failing to appoint someone else within 90 days may result in the outright dismissal of the claim.

The Court Of Appeal For Saskatchewan has now recently held that this order does “not dispose of the rights of the parties, in a final and binding way, with respect to any substantive issue in the action”.

The Canadian Nationalist Party has no intention of retaining someone other than Patron to represent them in the court of law at this time and to dismiss or delay a claim of such national importance would be an egregious denial of justice. It would also violate the inherent dignity of the human person and damage confidence in social and political institutions which are created to enhance participation in our society.

Last year, the Canadian Nationalist Party submitted a formal complaint with the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s Ombudsman, where we proposed an interview to discuss these matters and which has yet to receive any redress whatsoever.

By completely neglecting to cover these developments, Canada’s public media broadcaster has departed from their journalistic mandate and is acting in violation of their article of incorporation – specifically, The Broadcasting Act, 1991.

In response to this, last month we submitted a request with the Canadian Radio & Television Communications to revoke their broadcasting license rather than renewing it during the public consultation process.

The Broadcasting Act 1991, states clearly that the broadcasting system shall be effectively owned and controlled by Canadians, shall provide a public service essential to the maintenance and enhancement of national identity and cultural sovereignty, and should serve to enrich the political fabric of Canada. Additionally, where any conflict arises between the objectives of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, it shall be resolved in the public interest, and where the public interest would be equally served by resolving the conflict in favour of either, it shall be resolved in favour of a shared national consciousness and identity.

As a federally-sanctioned political party that has touted the importance of national identity since our very inception, we view neglecting to inform the public of our lawsuit which claims the Government Of Canada has failed to uphold its democratic mandate as a violation of The Broadcasting Act of 1991.

In recognition that this act is binding on Her Majesty The Queen, we also submit that the willful violation of these policies is grounds for civil asset forfeiture.

You can watch the Friday encounter at CBC Regina below: Video Player00:0007:04Video Player00:0009:07Video Player00:0004:10Video Player00:0001:55

We will continue to put pressure on our public media broadcaster until we are confident they are abiding by a journalistic mandate which is in the public interest and in alignment with The Broadcasting Act, 1991.

Read More:

MPP Randy Hillier Quotes Doctor That Masks Don’t Work & Lockdowns Don’t Work

Posted on by

MPP Randy Hillier Quotes Doctor That Masks Don’t Work & Lockdowns Don’t Work

This just too good not to retweet. @fordnation listen to this Dr. Healthy people do not infect other healthy people. Follow the science not the PH feareaucrats, science says masks don’t work, lockdowns don’t work.

Medico-Stalinism at Work in Alberta: Restaurant in Big Valley (pop. 357) ticketed for breaking Alberta COVID rules

Posted on by
Rebel News

Restaurant in Big Valley (pop. 357) ticketed for breaking Alberta COVID rules https://youtu.be/UBPDXNrB95E

Our latest www.FightTheFines.com case takes me to Big Valley, Alberta, a small town of 357 souls about two hours southeast of Edmonton.

The Big Valley Inn is like many small town hotels dotting the prairies. It houses the local tavern, a small restaurant and a liquor store. Big Valley itself is such a perfect Alberta small town: oil patch, farming, rodeo and freedom.

So it was really no surprise when the Big Valley Inn decided to defy the lockdown restrictions on restaurant dining service in the days before Jason Kenney’s UCP government lifted the ban.

Locals packed the place on steak night and hungry diners came from miles around to support Big Valley Inn owner Fred Millar and his staff in their act of civil disobedience.

But Alberta Health Services and the local RCMP were not as enthusiastic as the locals were, issuing Millar a notice to appear in court to answer for defying the orders of the chief medical officer of health

Rebel News is helping Millar and the Big Valley Inn fight that summons in court, at no cost to him. If not for the actions of Millar and others like him, including Chris Scott of the Whistle Stop Cafe in Mirror, restaurants in Alberta would still be closed.

B.C. Health Commissar Bonnie Henry Seeks Police Powers to Arrest Christian Churchgoers

Posted on by

B.C. top doc files to give police power to arrest churchgoers

British Columbia is one of the more open provinces in Canada, and yet it’s also one of the provinces that has come down the hardest on places of worship, as far as COVID-19 restrictions go. It may officially become the most oppressive province in Canada for freedom of religion very soon, if the injunction that Provincial Health Officer Dr. Bonnie Henry is now seeking against a few of the churches who have remained open is granted.

Perhaps that would be more understandable if churches, and other places of worship in B.C., had actually proven to be “super spreaders” as they’ve been treated, except that statistically, that doesn’t seem to be the case.

In a previous report, I showed you a peaceful protest of Catholics worshipping outside in Vancouver. These churchgoers are perplexed as to how all of their parishes (over 70 of them) have been kept closed, when they have been linked to zero COVID cases.

The very minute percentage of the thousands of places of worship in B.C. that have had a COVID case linked to someone who attended services there pales in comparison to other industries and services that have remained open. Like the business of ski hills concentrated in the small tourist hotspot of Whistler, which was recently linked to 547 cases in just over a month.

Dr. Henry’s application for an injunction specifically targets only the Christians connected to the three churches whose names were not anonymized on a petition that was filed on January 7 through the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. The petition was filed on behalf of some of the churches in B.C. that have tried to remain open while adhering to comprehensive COVID-19 plans, including attendance limits and social distancing.

The injunction Henry is seeking is set to be argued in front of B.C. Supreme Court Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson on Friday. If granted, it will not only provide police with the authority to arrest anyone who attends any religious gatherings put on by those three churches — including Riverside Calvary Worship, which has had zero COVID-19 outbreaks, yet was previously fined thousands of dollars for remaining open — but it will also give police the authority to arrest anyone they suspect was going to attend such a service, whether they did so or not.

So, is Dr. Bonnie Henry retaliating against only the churches who made public their opposition to her order?

I interviewed Marty Moore, one of the JCCF’s freedom-defending lawyers who is representing these three churches, shortly after he landed in Vancouver. I got his thoughts on the injunction, and a better understanding of the data Henry uses to try and justify keeping nearly everything open but places of worship.

Click to watch the full report

Duncan, B.C. Rally Protests Police Brutalization of Salon Owner Taneal McLovelynn

Posted on by

A good time was had by all on Feb 12th  2021 at our rally in Duncan BC.    From the Aquatic Centre we marched over to City Hall, calling on the civic authorities to reconsider mistreatment of Taneal McLovelynn.  Lots of thumbsup and enthusiastic honks along the way

The crux of our statement,  being : the way she’s been harassed as she tries to do business as usual in her salon is outrageous. Apparently, someone in high places has a problem because she accepts the word of customers who declare they’re medically-exempt from wearing the face covering.   Bylaw officers / RCMP slap violation notices on her for – ostensibly – failing to be appropriately-muzzled in her own business premises!   In one instance, an officer grabbed her by the arm dragged her over the threshhold out of her shop, handcuffed her and put her in a copcar because she refused to give them identification. Of course they knew exactly who she was.  Question now for a lawsuit, is:  “Was she properly arrested according to law?”

At our rally on Friday bylaw officers were very much in evidence … their truck parked smack dab in the public square, standing-by, masked to the eyebrows. As there were already over 50 warm bodies gathered … ILLEGALLY, according to the previous Orders of Her High-and-Mighty-Nessy-Bonnie Henry … I asked the lady officer “what are you going to do?”  Politely, she replied ‘You have the right to protest.  As long as you keep moving you’re a protest. If you stop, then you’re an  EVENT  which is illegal’…. Such sophistry didn’t just come off the top of her head.   No : right to the bottom of the hierarchy, they’ve been coached to mouthe such highfalutin’ legalese.  Same as what VPD Sgt. Walters told me at our first big rally in Vancouver, on Sept 13 2020 >   “we decided not to not issue tickets today because the Charter overrides the Public Health Act” direct quote … But – hey ! – it works for me. 

I went over to the RCMP who were discretely across the street. I asked Cpl Pharis “do you guys have your ticket books with you?”   To which he said with a smile “we always have them with us.” I realized he was the same one with whom I’d spoken at the big rally back in November, when 6 officers did nothing as 250 of us gathered to raise public consciousness about the Lockdown.  He said the same thing he’d said back then = that they would NOT be issuing tickets because “we’re here to keep the peace and make sure everyone is alright. Since this is a peaceful event, we have discretion”.   I was glad to hear a glimmer of sanity in this huge, tragic situation

The leading courtcase now underway in British Columbia to do with the Grand Lockdown,  is,  the action brought by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, on behalf of 12 Petitioners. * Three of the parties are churches which had their worship services INVADED by the RCMP.  The accounts rendered to Affidavits in that file =  facts of how the police acted as goons =  will make you shake your head in dismay 

when that matter is heard – March first to fourth 2021 at the Vancouver Lawcourts – the cops will be reminded of their proper place : as our servants, not uniformed thugs wearing loaded sidearms, enforcing the wicked policies of Bon-Monster Henry and the antichrist directing mind of the New Democratic Party. 

It’s important all-concerned appreciate how – other than the outrages committed in Chilliwack **  – the police in BC,  especially for the Victoria and Vancouver city,   are doing their job properly.     

Point being : no tickets nor bye-law infraction Notices were issued to us on Friday even though it most certainly was an EVENT, contrary to the Public Health Act Order.  It may seem that such a tiny little GATHERING doesn’t matter in the face of the onslaught of  propaganda puked-out by the lamestream media. Yet we do make a difference.  What I did not know yesterday afternoon, was =  the wording of the very latest Order.   In paragraph “J” of her Order of Feb 10 2021,  High Priestess of the Cult of the White Robe, Bonnie Henry,  goes on about how  ‘being sensitive to Charter rights for public gatherings in which a political position is being considered’. She didn’t retreat out of her good graces. No : the   NeeDiPpers   are venal but they’re not stupid.   John Horgan / his gaggle of chickenshit Trotsky-ites backed down after rumblings of our outrage disturbed supercilious celebration of their communist coup in BC.

Every time we get out and own the streets,  and amplify it with our own publicity media = we reach hearts and minds of folks whose instincts and human logic tell them there is something sinister about this KronaMadness … provoking them to think for themselves.  The Lie comes to an end but the Truth goes on forever     

Gordon S Watson

Justice Critic, Party of Citizens Who Have Decided To Think for Ourselves & Be Our Own Politicians

* S 210209 Vancouver Registry Supreme Court of British Columbia :  ALAIN BEAUDOIN  et al. versus  HMTQ ; BONNIE HENRY IN HER CAPACITY AS PROVINCIAL HEALTH OFFICER

** what the RCMP did in Chilliwack at the IMMANUEL COVENANT REFORMED CHURCH ; RIVERSIDE CALVARY CHAPEL ; FREE REFORMED CHURCH was a plain violation of section 176 of the Criminal Code. Don’t think that policemen are immune from being charged with such crime. 

Bruce Pardy: B.C. courts asking for ‘correct pronouns’ is state-mandated identity politics

Posted on by

Bruce Pardy: B.C. courts asking for ‘correct pronouns’ is state-mandated identity politics

Author of the article:Bruce Pardy, Special to National PostPublishing date:Feb 09, 2021  •  2 hours ago  •  4 minute read

On December 16, the B.C. Supreme Court issued a practice direction that directs parties and counsel to provide their “correct pronouns” to be used in the proceeding. Photo by Arlen Redekop /PNG
  1. with Video

Article content

When courts issue practice directions, usually only litigation lawyers pay attention. No one else needs to know when counsel should wear gowns or how commissioners should be identified on affidavits. But recently, the British Columbia Supreme Court issued a direction like no other. Practice Direction 59, released on December 16, advises parties and their lawyers, when introducing themselves in court, to provide their “correct pronouns” to be used in the proceeding. People look to courts to protect their fundamental freedoms, but in B.C., the courts themselves now encroach upon freedom of speech by expecting litigants to use pronouns that their opponents prescribe.

The previous month, a judge of the Court gave a preview of the implications. The Court was hearing the case of a 17-year-old who wanted to transition from female to male. The father and provincial authorities supported a plan to have an operation to remove both of the teen’s breasts, but the mother had brought an action trying to prevent it. The mother regarded the teen as a girl, and it was the transition to male that was the very issue before the court. Yet the judge challenged the right of the mother and the mother’s counsel to refer to the teen as “her”. According to the transcript, the judge said, “there has been a request that counsel refer to (the youth) as he or him … are you refusing to do that?” Translation: You may be arguing that your client’s daughter should remain a girl, but please acknowledge that he is a boy.

The practice direction, along with an almost identical notice applicable to B.C. provincial courts, was the product of consultation with the Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Community (SOGIC) of the Canadian Bar Association (B.C. chapter). One of its purposes, according to announcements, is to improve experiences within the legal system for gender diverse parties and lawyers. The direction does not merely clarify that parties and their counsel may advise the court of their pronouns — litigants were free to do that before the direction was issued — but that they may require other parties to comply. By making declared pronouns “correct”, the direction makes other pronouns, by default, incorrect.

Under the direction, correct pronouns are “to be used” in the courtroom. Even identifying your own pronouns is compulsory. Any parties or lawyers who decline to do so will be prompted by a court clerk. While practice directions do not constitute the law in the same sense as statutory enactments and regulations, they do reflect the Court’s expectations on practice and process. Besides, the last thing litigants wish to do is irritate their judge. For practical purposes, the practice direction is the law inside the courtrooms of British Columbia.

People are apt to believe that the law will protect them from the irrationality of mobs. They may think that courts are in the business of assessing evidence and applying laws to facts, and that they will be neutral in every dispute, insulated from the influence of politics. Instead, B.C. courts are insisting that litigants say things they may not believe. They validate subjective identities of parties by legitimizing the proposition that everyone must declare their own pronoun that other people must use.

When Jordan Peterson objected to the proposal to add “gender identity or expression” to the Canadian Human Rights Act in 2017 on the grounds that people could be required to use prescribed pronouns, he was ridiculed for scaremongering. Only a handful of lawyers agreed with him, or at least few said so publicly. We were derisively told that this and similar provisions in provincial human rights codes would have no effect upon free speech, notwithstanding the advice of the Ontario Human Rights Commission that “refusing to refer to a trans person by … a personal pronoun that matches their gender identity … will likely be discrimination” in employment, accommodation, and education. Now prescribed pronouns have become compulsory in British Columbia courts too.

Proponents of the practice direction argue that using a person’s personal pronoun is merely to treat that person with respect, and that doing so should be regarded as part of a lawyer’s professional responsibility to be civil in the courtroom. However, when courts enforce prescribed pronouns, they are not merely requiring civility but taking sides in a legal, political, and philosophical dispute. To compel pronouns is to insist that people can own and control how others regard them, and to force them to reflect a particular view of reality.

Advertisement

Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Article content continued

The agenda is to force social change by making dissent illegitimate. Last week, when Canadian Lawyer Magazine published an opinion piece by B.C. lawyer Shahdin Farsai critical of the direction, an enraged mob of social justice lawyers descended, threatening over social media to boycott the magazine and demanding retraction. The editors obliged, removing the article and pleading that it “did not reflect the views” of the magazine, as though that has ever been the criterion for publishing op-eds. Such is the present state of open debate on these issues within B.C.’s legal community.

Free people make their own choices. Women are at liberty to have their breasts removed and identify themselves as men if that is what they want. But true freedom is universal and reciprocal, and other people are not bound to go along. They may express their reactions in their own words and refer to others as “him” or “her” as they see fit. No one should be obligated to affirm someone else’s self-image.

Reciprocal freedom is not now what we have. Today’s “human rights” put words in the mouths of some for the benefit of others. The Supreme Court’s practice direction represents state-mandated identity politics on the road to perdition. Social justice activism has captured the courts of British Columbia.

Bruce Pardy is professor of law at Queen’s University

Ex-Political Prisoner Brad Love Heads to Court on “Mischief” Charges

Posted on by

Ex-Political Prisoner Brad Love Heads to Court on “Mischief” Charges

FORT MCMURRAY, ALBERTA. February 10, 2021. Ex-political prisoner Brad Love heads to Court here today for yet another round in a more than 10-year battle by the RCMP and local snowflakes put off by this outspoken citizen journalist, enemy of government taxation, special privileges for minorities and demography shaking immigration.Over a 15-year period Mr. Love served nearly three years in prison from charges laid in 2002 under Canada’s notorious “hate law” (Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code.) His crime? He had written letters critical of Canada’s immigration policies to 20 MPs and other public officials.

On October 23, officers from the local detachment of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police arrested former political prisoner and longtime political activist Brad Love at his townhouse. He was taken to police headquarters and charged with 10 counts of “mischief under $5,000.” He was interrogated and then released on his own recognisance.   Two weeks before, his home had been raided by six RCMP officers (masked, of course) with a warrant looking for glue, “Keep Canada White” posters and copies of the Canadian Immigration Hotline, published by the Canada First Immigration Committee, and which has been in publication for over 30 years.
A trial date was set for May 31, 2021. Several weeks ago, a masked man who did not identify himself came to Mr. Love’s residence and presented a summons to appear on January 27 before the Court of Queen’s Bench. When Mr. Love arrived at the Court, he was denied entry to the building because of the COVID virus! Not wanting to miss a court appearance, Mr. Love phoned the Court. He eventually was subject to a telephone conference with Judge Stephanie Cleary. The Crown is desperate to prevent the savvy Mr. Love from cross-examining witnesses, especially police officers. Over his objections, a court appointed lawyer will do the cross-examination for him.
He will appear again in Court today to set a new trial date and to make several motions. As he notes: “This will be my first appearance in person before a judge!”

Many of the charges go back to July of 2020. A police statement reported: ” On July 22 around 5 p.m. police responded and found racially related writings on a vehicle in the 200 block of Powder Dr.” Apparently, these were posters or newsletters. Since when did “racially related writings” become a crime or cause for police action? Mr. Love states that Fort McMurray is awash with drugs — a problem that might better occupy police time.

In the meantime, Mr. Love has received some 300 pages of disclosure. When he went to pick up his disclosure, the desk clerk interrupted him even  before he could identify himself or his business and said: “We know who you are.”

His four housemates were all questioned by the RCMP, but there is no mention of this fact in the disclosure.

The hefty disclosure is light on content. There are no witness statements, photos or video linking Mr. Love to any postering. Apparently, the RCMP did access credit card sales at the Superstore close to Mr. Love’s residence and established that he had shopped there — no surprise.
A more sinister revelation was the fact that Mr. Love had been the object of many hostile posts on Facebook by people who had been stalking him and taking pictures of his home and truck. There had been numerous threats against him online.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

The Freedom Pushback is Growing: Two United Conservative Party MLAs Join the END THE LOCKDOWN Caucus

Posted on by

UCP MLAs Barnes & Pitt join ‘End the Lockdown Caucus’

Airdrie MLA Angela Pitt and Cypress-Medicine Hat MLA Drew Barnes announced their moves publicly on Tuesday – with Pitt saying more colleagues are certain to follow.

mm

Published 1 day ago

on February 9, 2021

ByDave Naylor

Two Alberta UCP MLAs have come out against their party’s COVID-19 position and joined the End the Lockdowns Caucus.

Airdrie MLA Angela Pitt and Cypress-Medicine Hat MLA Drew Barnes announced their moves publicly on Tuesday – with Pitt saying more colleagues are certain to follow.

Pitt, the deputy speaker of the Legislature, said she has worked within caucus to try and end the pandemic lockdowns but without success.

“A constituent sent me the Liberty Coalition Canada’s website and it was exactly everything my constituents and I believe in,” said Pitt in an interview with The Western Standard.

“It was an easy decision to make to come out and support my constituents. I’m not going down without a fight.

“One hundred per cent, more people in the caucus will join us. I tried to work on things internally, but it was not working on the inside.

Barnes, a constant thorn in Kenney’s side has been calling for an end to the lockdown for weeks,

“It is time to open up more of our economy, not in two weeks but now,” Barnes said in a January video.

“I have always believed in protecting the vulnerable with rapid five minute blood tests and support for front line workers. I have always believed in a regional approach. Medicine Hat’s mental health crisis is as big as the COVID crisis. I have always believed in the protection of civil liberties, the rights of small business and Albertans right to choose how they protect themselves,” Barnes said Tuesday.

Premier Jason Kenney’s government started relaxing some restrictions on Monday.

Pitt and Barnes join a group of politicians who have banded together to try and convince governments across the country to end their COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns.

Calling themselves the “End the Lockdown Caucus”, the group originally started with five members but has grown considerably.

And a petition in support of the group has already garnered more than 21,000 signatures.

The founding members of the caucus include Ontario MPP Randy Hillier, PPC Leader Maxime Bernier, Wildrose Independence Party Leader Paul Hinman, Independent MP Derek Sloan, and several municipal politicians.

“We are current and former elected representatives from municipal, provincial, and federal levels of government across Canada, unified in pursuit of the truth, and resolved to ensure there is open, honest, and public debate regarding the COVID-19 government response,” the group said in a statement.

Jewish Antifa — Israeli Censors & Dirty Tricks Squad

Posted on by

What is Jewish Antifa? Meet the Israeli Activists Set to Strike a ‘Death Blow to Fascism’

In this new Newsweek article, an Israeli Antifa group admits that they are targeting a sweet, innocent, good-natured guy like me. “…they are looking into prominent far-right figurehead Billy Roper, a man the Southern Poverty Law Center describes as an “uncensored voice of violent neo-Nazism” — Billy Roper

NEWSWEEK (February 9, 2021)By Ewan Palmer On 2/9/21 at 11:31 AM EST

A hacking group based in Israel who have already taken down a Ku Klux Klan website and doxxed its members have said they are determined to expose more white supremacists after witnessing the insurrection at the Capitol.

Last month, the anti-fascist group Hayalim Almonim—Hebrew for Anonymous Soldiers—had successfully hacked into the website for Patriotic Brigade of the KKK hate group, completely altering it to include phrases such as “goodnight white pride” and reveal the names, addresses and other personal details of its alleged members.

The group further emphasized their intentions by changing the website URL from Klan331.com to the new domain JewishAntifa.com.

As part of the hack, Hayalim Almonim also provided details of Patriotic Brigade’s leader Kevin James Smith’s previous conviction for sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl.Newsweek subscription offers >

Speaking to Newsweek, a spokesperson for the hacking group said they are a relatively new operation and a majority of their “anonymous soldiers” are based in Israel, although they also have members in Europe and the U.S.

“The White Power movement is international. Even the KKK has contacts with European fascists. We target them wherever they are in this world,” said JewAnon, an information relay for Hayalim Almonim.

“However, the United States is the only country we are aware of where the white nationalists have succeeded in a successful insurrection at the nation’s Capitol. Hence our current focus on this country.

“We cannot allow the United States to fall to fascism, for the good of the world. We all watched with horror at the sight of the Confederate flag being carried through the halls of the American Capitol. Do not underestimate this threat, and allow it become a precursor to something worse.”Newsweek subscription offers >

JewAnon added: “We are not going to stop until we end the Klan and strike a death blow to fascism in the United States.”

Discussing the illegal doxxing of members of the Patriotic Brigade in the site’s hack, JewAnon told Newsweek they will be “hard-pressed” to find people who view “exposing Neo-Nazi rapists in a negative light.”

“We have received an incredible amount of support. Anything negative is white nationalists covertly attempting to spin the narrative. They have failed miserably.”

Unsurprisingly, the group is reluctant to reveal exactly how they further plan to battle white supremacy in the U.S. They did state, however, that they are looking into prominent far-right figurehead Billy Roper, a man the Southern Poverty Law Center describes as an “uncensored voice of violent neo-Nazism” and George Bois Stout, an arms dealer in De Kalb, Texas and alleged leader of the Church of the Ku Klux Klan.

The group has also set its sight on a rally organized by the Church of the Ku Klux Klan, which is being planned to take place in Paris, Texas, in October. Read more

While there are obvious connections between Hayalim Almonim and the Anonymous hacking group, they say they have no issue with being labeled antifa too.

“Antifa is an acronym for anti-fascist action. That is a very accurate description of our activities,” JewAnon said. “Antifa in the United States tried to warn you against the growing white nationalist threat. The media responded by unfairly demonizing them, and ignoring the growing white nationalist threat.

“We aren’t using the fascist label against politics we don’t like, but outright dangerous fascists who are a terror threat. We believe these people are very dangerous, and cannot be allowed to hide in the shadows any longer.”

kkk
A member of the Ku Klux Klan salutes during American Nazi Party rally at Valley Forge National Park September 25, 2004 in Valley Forge, Pennsylvania. A hacking group based in Israel who have already taken down a KKK website and doxxed its members is promising further action. William Thomas Cain/Getty