Tribunal administratif

Le maire de Vichy en droit d’interdire un déjeuner en hommage au révisionniste Robert Faurisson

Administrative Tribunal
The mayor of Vichy has the right to ban a lunch in homage to the revisionist Robert Faurisson

Vichy Policy Justice 

Published the 24/01/2020 at 19: 10
The mayor of Vichy has the right to ban a lunch in homage to the revisionist Robert Faurisson
The president-in-office of the court of first instance was perfectly entitled to ban this lunch. © Pierre COUBLE

Facebook Twitter Email Decrease text size Increase text size 2 

The holding of this meal, during which was to be given an international prize bearing the name of the revisionist militant, in a Vichy restaurant (Allier), this Saturday, January 25, was banned by municipal decree.

By a decision notified this Friday, January 24, the judge of interim measures of the Administrative Court (TA) of Clermont-Ferrand has just authorized the mayor of Vichy, Frédéric Aguilera, to ban a lunch-conference that was to be held Saturday, January 25, in a hotel of the thermal city, in homage to Robert Faurisson.

During this meal, was to be presented an international prize bearing the name of the French revisionist militant, who died in October 2018. “The defence of crimes against humanity or their contestation are criminal offences that it is the responsibility of the police authority to prevent when it has knowledge of them,” the mayor said in a statement.

He denied the existence of the gas chambers of the Struthof camp : Robert Faurisson tried in Cusset (Allier)

The TA de Clermont has received a request from the instigators of this lunch-conference, under the urgent procedure, for the cancellation of this prohibition order. The applicants considered that the order in question constituted ” a serious and manifestly unlawful interference with freedom of Assembly in a private place “, arguing that neither the “award” nor the “profile of the participants” was “such as to disturb public order, endanger public security” or ” undermine respect for the human person “.
For the court, the risk of infringement
public order is well constituted

After recalling that “respect for the dignity of the human person (was) one of the components of Public Order” and considering that this luncheon, having “been the subject of an advertisement on a website”, the “risks of infringement of human dignity and of remarks likely to constitute criminal offences” did exist, the judge of the interim indicated that the mayor of Vichy had “not committed a serious and manifestly illegal infringement of the fundamental freedom of Assembly”.

The Chosen One was therefore perfectly entitled to ban this lunch, in the name of his police power. The Administrative Court of Clermont-Ferrand ordered the applicants “to pay the municipality of Vichy the sum of € 1,000”.

Olivier Rezel

Publié le 24/01/2020 à 19h10

Pour le juge des référés, l’élu était parfaitement en droit d’interdire ce déjeuner. © Pierre COUBLE

• Facebook
• Twitter
• Email
• Diminuer la taille du texte
• Augmenter la taille du texte
• 2

La tenue de ce repas, au cours duquel devait être remis un prix international portant le nom du militant révisionniste, dans un restaurant vichyssois (Allier), ce samedi 25 janvier, a été interdit par arrêté municipal.

Par une décision notifiée ce vendredi 24 janvier, le juge des référés du tribunal administratif (TA) de Clermont-Ferrand vient d’autoriser le maire de Vichy, Frédéric Aguilera, à interdire un déjeuner-conférence qui devait se tenir le samedi 25 janvier, dans un hôtel de la cité thermale, en hommage à Robert Faurisson.

Au cours de ce repas, devait être remis un prix international portant le nom du militant révisionniste français, décédé en octobre 2018. « L’apologie des crimes contre l’humanité ou leur contestation constituent des infractions pénales qu’il revient à l’autorité de police de prévenir lorsqu’il en a connaissance », justifie le maire dans un communiqué.

Il nie l’existence des chambres à gaz du camp de Struthof : Robert Faurisson jugé à Cusset (Allier)

Le TA de Clermont a été saisi par les instigateurs de ce déjeuner-conférence, selon la procédure d’urgence, d’une requête pour annulation de cet arrêté d’interdiction. Les requérants estimaient que l’arrêté en question portait « une atteinte grave et manifestement illégale à la liberté de réunion dans un lieu privé », arguant que ni la « remise d’un prix », ni « le profil des participants  » n’étaient « de nature à troubler l’ordre public, porter atteinte à la sécurité publique » ou encore de « porter atteinte au respect de la personne humaine ».

Pour le tribunal, le risque d’atteinte
à l’ordre public est bien constitué

Après avoir rappelé que le « respect de la dignité de la personne humaine (était) une des composantes de l’ordre public » et estimé que ce déjeuner, ayant « fait l’objet d’une publicité sur un site internet », les « risques d’atteinte à la dignité humaine et de propos susceptibles de constituer des infractions pénales » existaient bel et bien, le juge des référés a indiqué que le maire de Vichy n’avait « pas commis d’atteinte grave et manifestement illégale à la liberté fondamentale de réunion ».

L’élu était donc parfaitement en droit d’interdire ce déjeuner, au nom de son pouvoir de police. Le tribunal administratif de Clermont-Ferrand a condamné les requérants « à verser à la commune de Vichy la somme de 1.000 € ».

Olivier Rezel

Menu

Greetings and welcome from the Jan27.org committee. We are made up of scientists, engineers, literary text experts, historical researchers, free-speech advocates, skeptics, and the just plain intellectually curious. We invite you to join us!

We chose January 27 for our day of commemoration because of the ceremonies taking place on this date at the United Nations in New York City and at the Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial Museum in Poland. That commemoration is named the “International Day of Commemoration in Memory of the Victims of the Holocaust.”

We thought it would be a good idea to add our voices to the many that are being heard in those places, telling their stories of gas chambers, torture, starvation, and genocide. Our stories are about science, the laws of physics, technical possibilities and impossibilities, common sense and the constant lowering of the death tolls. We bring Good News! For example:

Right at the very spot that the story of 6 million murdered Jews is being told today and every day, these plaques tell the real story. Up until 1990, the plaque on the left was in place, in several languages, in front of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Monument at the Poland memorial, claiming that four million people were killed here “by nazi murderers” in the five years between 1940 and 1945.

But in 1990 (corresponding with the fall of the Soviet Union) the number was reduced to 1.5 million, with no explanation, and the plaque on the right replaced the original plaque. That’s 2.5 million less murdered humans! How could the historians and managers of the memorial site have been so wrong for 45 years? What made them “re-check” and suddenly “discover” (rather admit) their error? Only the growing body of critical, scholarly and scientific writings that demonstrated the impossibility of four million people being murdered in “gas chambers” and then cremated to ashes at Birkenau.

The answer to why the 4 million figure was used in the first place is that it was deemed necessary at the 1946 Nuremberg Tribunal as a support and justification for the fantastic 6 million total number of Jews “murdered.” Who demanded the 6 million number? You should be able to answer that yourself.

But more, the official Auschwitz-Birkenau death number now stands even lower at 1.1 million. There are holocaust historians in good standing who have reduced it to 900,000 and even 700,000. How much lower will it go?

This is just one example of the many changes in the holocaust story that the official establishment has been forced to make due to the critical scrutiny and investigation (at great risk to their own life and liberty) of those we call Revisionists. The work of Revisionism is ongoing; the resistance to it is deeply entrenched. Therefore our commemoration honors the brave Revisionists who have introduced sanity to what began as a wildly improbable account based entirely on wartime atrocity propaganda. With this annual commemoration we are …

CALLING FOR A RETURN TO SANITY

* * *

Our first order of business is to honor those holocaust revisionists who are now deceased, among them many of the very first pioneers who blazed the trail for those who followed. We list them here in order of the appearance of their first revisionist work, and we include the persecution they suffered at the hands of the entrenched “Holocaust” forces. Our esteemed honorees are:

To these men we owe our gratitude and our commitment to carry on so that their sacrifices, and those of others still living, will not have been made in vain. It’s a sad fact that in our societies, it is not acknowledged that

REVISIONISTS HAVE RIGHTS TOO!

* * *

How and Why the UN Resolution Came About

The UN Decides a Universal Ban on Revisionism

By Robert Faurisson, 17 November 2005

On November 1st, unanimously and without a vote, the representatives of the 191 nations making up the UN adopted—or let be adopted—an Israeli-drafted resolution proclaiming January 27th “International Day of Commemoration in memory of the victims of the Holocaust”.

Moreover, the resolution “Rejects any denial of the Holocaust as an historical event, either in full or part”.

Historical revisionism thus sees its existence acknowledged by the whole world, a fact proving that it has some life in it, but, at the same time, this decision means that the revisionists find themselves struck with the reprobation of all the countries of the world.

As for the “State” of the Vatican, which has no seat at the UN, it had, as early as in 1992, declared:

There is no historical revisionism that can call into question the inhuman abyss of the Holocaust” («Non c’è revisionismo storico che possa rimettere in discussione l’abisso disumano dell’Olocausto») ( L’Osservatore Romano, 7 November 1992).

The history of human societies and religions is rich in prohibitions, bannings, excommunications but, whereas, up to a recent past, the victims could, at least in principle, hope to find a refuge outside of their land or group of origin, here the condemnation is, for the first time ever, of universal character. It is thus confirmed that historical revisionism is a phenomenon of exceptional nature and also that the Jews, yet once more, have been able to obtain exorbitant privileges.

A sleight of hand by the Jews

It was through a sleight of hand that the Israeli delegation succeeded in getting this resolution passed. It proceeded in a manner like that of certain associations which, in France, under cover of a campaign against paedophilia, have obtained a law prohibiting, on the Internet, communication relating to paedophilia and … to revisionism!

To begin, they asked: “Is paedophilia not a horror in itself?” The response was “yes”. Their second step was to add: “Is paedophilia on the Internet not to be banned by a specific law?” The response, there again, was “yes”. As a third step the associations concluded: “Let’s fight, accordingly, to obtain a law against paedophilia and … revisionism [which they called ‘negationism’]”.

For his part, the President of the General Assembly, the Swede Jan Ellasion, had the deftness on November 1st to ask orally whether anyone was opposed to the resolution aimed at commemorating the “Holocaust”. No hands being raised, he declared, without prior recourse to a vote of any kind, that the resolution was thereby adopted, the text of which contained in one of its provisions the condemnation of any form of “Holocaust” revisionism. The draft was approved by the United States in utter disregard of the guarantees of freedom of opinion provided by the first amendment to its constitution. And, most remarkably, this Israeli text was accepted by the Arabo-Moslem countries, including Iran. All those present approved, or let pass with soft verbal restrictions, a resolution originating from the Jews that goes so far as to condemn the right of free research on a historical subject.

The UN act assumes only a political and not a juridical character. Still, since it provides that the Secretary General will have to report on the measures subsequently taken within the framework of the resolution, the revisionists will have reason to fear consequences for themselves of a judicial or administrative nature, for instance, as regards border and airport police, authorisation to enter and stay in certain countries or the issuing of visas. The resolution will serve morally to justify and facilitate extradition measures taken against revisionists. 

* * *

“What we have come to understand is that the holocaust is the
secret weapon of psychological warfare of the Powers That Be,
which they use to expand and maintain their militaristic empire,
to justify wars and subjugation, to foist their financial, economic
and cultural system upon others against their will.”

From the Editors of “Auschwitz: The Case for Sanity,” 2010, page 12

Trump passes the word to Gov. Justice: “White self-hatred is SICK!!!”

Ian Verner MacDonald is one of the few remaining RCAF vets from WW II. A former diplomat, writer, publisher, businessman & lifelong historical Truth Seeker, Ian turns 95 January 19. He is an immigration critic and ferocious friend of freedom of speech. CAFE honored him in 2010 with its first “Free Speech Award.”

Hear Paul Fromm & Kenn Gividen on “the Ethnostate”: Transman & Other Weirdness
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6E6_AmWmr0

So, You Think Norway is Part of the “Free World”: Moslems Invade but “Security” Police Arrest & Deport White Nationalist Author

The American pro-white nationalist Greg Johnson has been arrested in Oslo, where he was presenting at a conference organized by the network Scandza forum.

The American All Right profile Greg Johnson.

The American nationalist and alt-right profile Greg Johnson has been arrested by the Norwegian security police PST with reference to the Aliens Act.

Johnson was in Oslo to lecture at the international conference Scandza forum when he was arrested.

PST’s press spokesman Martin Bernsen tells NRK that Johnson has been arrested and expelled because of the political opinions he expressed.

– He can play an obvious radicalization role. He will be dispatched from Norway as soon as possible, says Bernsen.

PST accuses Johnson of supporting political violence and of defending Anders Behring Breivik’s terrorist act in 2011.

Johnson himself denies this in a written statement and says that PST has taken what he has written about Breivik out of context.

The conference organizer Frode Midjord also distances himself from violence.

– Right-wing extremism means violence as a method, and we are far from that. We want a political debate, Midjord tells NRK.

Outside the conference room where Scandza’s forum was held in Oslo, a large number of left-wing counter-protesters had gathered.

The situation turned violent when the left-wing extremists broke the police’s barricades to try to get into the conference room. 25 counter-protesters were arrested for disorderly order.

Greg Johnson describes himself as a racially conscious nationalist and advocates a white ethnostat. He opposes immigration and multiculturalism and is often accused of being anti-Semitic.

Johnson is a Ph.D. in philosophy, he has published over 40 books and since 2010 has been editor-in-chief of the nationalist publisher Counter-Currents Publishing.

Some time ago it was revealed that the gay Greg Johnson is part of a gay network within the alt-right sphere in the United States.