This is to let you know that Fredrick Töben passed away at about 6:00 am, German time, June 29. He died of a gallbladder complaint. He had been ill for two months. Fredrick´s birthday was on 2. June. He was born in 1944. He was 76 years old. He will be cremated in Sydney.
RIP Fredrick Gerald Töben, you tried your best but only God can win the fight against the enemies of God. “
Dr. Toben visited Canada several times and was sponsored as a speaker by the Canadian Association for Free Expression.
He founded the Adelaide Institute. He dedicated half his life to fighting the vitriol, lies and hatred against his German people.
The anti-free speech Australian Jewish lobby had him charged and jailed for his historical skepticism about the Hollywood version of World War II.
Canadian videographer Brian Ruhe comments: ” I just got the very sad news that Fredrick Toben died in Australia at age 76. He was a great revisionist of Holocaust history and went to jail for it. I did a few videos with Fredrick in 2017 and will re-release those. We e-mailed back and forth over the years and I was trying to get him back on. I am planning memorial videos with those who knew him.”
Be very clear:
Canada is in the midst of an unthinking, hysterical cancel culture reminiscent
of the insanity and destruction of Mao’s Red Guards. Active collaborators in
this Cultural Marxist insanity are
many in businesses and government. There is a party line of approved victimhood
from which no one may deviate. All that is missing is Mao’s Little Red Book. And let there
be no doubt, no one, no one is safe.
From corporate
director, corporate advisor and CBC
commentator, former Alberta Treasurer and later Canadian Alliance Party Leader Stockwell Day, within 24 hours was
out on the sidewalk — purged. Of course, no trial, no hearing, no due process.
“A
former Conservative cabinet minister resigned from both the Telus board of directors and a business
law firm after comments he made on TV about
racism in Canada. Stockwell Day was
on a CBC Power & Politics panel Tuesday
discussing Prime Minister Justin
Trudeau’s response to protests over the police killing of George Floyd, a black man in the U.S. Day said systemic racism was not
an issue in Canada and compared people’s experiences of racism here to him
being mocked for wearing glasses as a child.
Wednesday
afternoon, Telus released a statement announcing it had accepted Day’s resignation from the
board. ‘The views expressed by Mr. Day during yesterday’s broadcast of Power & Politics are not reflective
of the values and beliefs of our organization,’ Telus said in a statement. Day had been on the board since
2011.” And what values would those be, pray tell. Making money? Clearly
not defending free speech or diversity of opinion. Mr. Day, incidentally, was
elected by Telus shareholders. He
must have been put under intolerable pressure to resign.
“Soon
after, Teresa Dufort, partner and CEO at McMillan LLP, released a statement saying the law firm had accepted Day’s resignation as
a strategic adviser. ‘At McMillan LLP,
we believe that systemic racism is real and that it can only be addressed when
each of us — as individuals and organizations — commits to meaningful change,’
she said. ‘Yesterday, Stockwell Day
made comments during a televised interview that run counter to this view.’” (Vancouver Sun, June 4, 2020) So,
Stockwell Day, who was representing
his own opinions, not McMillan or Telus, had deviated from the new party
line of White Guilt. Does McMillan
mean it too is actually racist? Is Teresa
Dufort prepared to give up her position to some worthy Negro or Indian? But
Stockwell must be punished.
Later,
the CBC announced that Day had
stepped down from his role as a commentator on Power & Politics,
When
asked about systemic racism, here’s what the former Reform Party MP actually said: “We have to recognize that our
system is not perfect in Canada. Yes, there’s a few idiot racists hanging
around but Canada is not a racist country and most Canadians are not racist.
And our system, that always needs to be improved, is not systemically racist.
… Should I have gone through school and been mocked because I had glasses and
was called four-eyes and because of the occupation of my parents?” Day
asked. “Should I have been mocked for all that? No, of course not. But are
Canadians largely and in majority racist? No, we are not.” (CBC, June 3, 2020) These comments were,
of course, considered heresy. Straight White men are not allowed to feel pain
or exclusion. Only privileged minorities are allowed this narrative.
I just finished writing a column the other night about Michael Korenberg, the University of British Columbia (UBC) board of governors chair who was subjected to an online mobbing after the UBC Students Against Bigotry, an Antifa-affiliated campus group, disapproved of some of the tweets that Korenberg “liked.”
The UBC Students Against Bigotry (whose entire mandate is to deplatform non-leftists and get them fired) combed through Korenberg’s Twitter “likes” and found that he liked tweets by mainstream conservative pundits such as Dinesh D’Souza, Ann Coulter and Charlie Kirk. He also liked tweets that wished Donald Trump a happy birthday, and that celebrated Antifa being designated a domestic terrorist group. Most unforgivably, one of the tweets Korenberg liked was critical of Black Lives Matter, which is a group you can apparently never criticize.
Leftist media outlets and academics also joined forces to get Korenberg fired: an article in the Tyee called his social media likes “disturbing,” and UBC education professor Annette Henry opined that Korenberg’s likes reflected a “white supremacist capitalist [hetero]patriarchy” worldview, and “It’s unfortunate that we have people in such positions of authority at UBC.”
Henry couldn’t resist but add, “we still keep hiring white people where we have the opportunity not to.”
Another UBC professor Jennifer Berdahl told the UBC student newspaper that Korenberg should resign.
At the end of the column I had written, I said that I hoped Korenberg would stand up to the mob and that this debacle didn’t end in him issuing a grovelling apology and resignation letter.
But I had to toss out that column, as Korenberg has now released his looming resignation letter.
“Over the past two weeks some articles/statements that I ‘liked’ on Twitter supported regressive voices and took aim at thousands of brave individuals who are standing up against racism, discrimination and hatred,” he wrote in a statement posted on Twitter.
“I accept that in liking these social media posts, I damaged what I support and that I hurt people. I wholeheartedly apologize to them, particularly to the students, faculty and staff of UBC…I have stepped down because it is the right thing to do.”
And that really is all he is resigning for, folks: because he liked some tweets featuring basic, mainstream Republican talking points.
Korenberg was showing signs, early on, that he was the “apologize and resign” type. He told PressProgress that he regrets liking the tweets, giving the weak excuse that he liked them late at night.
But for the rest of us, if we are ever targeted by a mob of leftist campus activists and media outlets for something so minuscule as liking conservative-minded tweets, I hope we can muster up some courage and not be the type to “apologize and resign.”
OCCUPIED TORONTO: Mayor surrenders public square to VIOLENT thugs
When I went there to do a news report, the protesters swarmed me and my cameraman — but City Hall’s own security told me I was the one who had to leave, not the squatters.In fact, City Hall ordered my own professional security to leave the premises. And worst of all, an actual Toronto police officer threatened to arrest me! Click hereto watch my full report — it’s truly shocking:
Welcome to John Tory’s Toronto, where actual criminals control the town square, and reporters are kicked out by police. Who could have guessed that turning Toronto into a “sanctuary city” would lead to such anarchy?
But I promise you, we will do our journalism even if Antifa thugs, City Hall security or even real police don’t want us to.
I need your help though. These days Antifa attacks me on sight — they know that police have been ordered not to stop them. So, I have to travel with several bodyguards to protect me, since the police won’t. I’m literally the only journalist in Canada who has to do this. Antifa would never attack the CBC — that’s their official mouthpiece!
P.S. We’re not easily scared off. We went back to Toronto City Hall yesterday. This time we brought our whole team, including our lawyer and SEVEN security guards. But the protesters still became violent. Seven bodyguards is an absurd price to pay, but we paid it. If you can help, please visit JournalistDefenceFund.com.
PP.S. If you prefer to use snail mail you can make cheques payable to “Rebel News” and send them to:
PO Box 61056 Eglinton/Dufferin RO Toronto, ON, M6E 5B2
Jewish communist revolutionary, Lev Davidovich Bronstein (Trotsky) who launched the Red Terror
Ontario Legislature Smashes Free Speech & Thought, Gives Second Reading to Bill 168 & Makes Criticism of Jews Illegal & An Action to Be Fought If you’re nostalgic for the early days of communism’s reign of terror is Russia, move to Ontario and see such thought tyranny at work. Of course, there are not public executions, yet in Ontario. It’s still tyranny light. Early in the 1920s, the communist dictatorship in Russia enacted a law making “anti-semitism” a crime punishable by death. The regime had much to hide. Russian communism was largely created by Jewish radicals and the early elite of commissars was top heavy with Jews. Those were facts. To state them, though, was “anti-Semitism” and earned you a death sentence.
Sadly, the Progressive Conservative government of Doug Ford — don’t let the”conservative” in the name fool you — has adopted a self-serving Jewish definition of “anti-Semitism” that neatly makes almost any criticism of Jews “anti-semitic” and, therefore, something the Ontario government is dedicated to fighting. Firstly, one may ask why a government should be fighting any ideology– anti-Semitism, flat earthism or anything else. The province is so deeply in debt that if should have a single penny to waste currying favour with a tiny minority The Ford government just gave second reading to Bill 168 to fight “Anti-Semitism”. It’s scary awful. Firstly, the DEFINITION of Anti-Semitism they’re using is the one they used to screw Dr. James Sears, editor, and Leroy St. Germaine, publisher of YOUR WARD NEWS, which they are fighting to overturn. It comes from the “International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance”. Here is what the bill says:
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
1. Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
2. Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
3. Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
4. Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
5. Adopt the following non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism:“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”
6. Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
7. Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
8. Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
9. Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
10. Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
11. Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
12. Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state
As you can see, there is room here to persecute people for legitimate criticism of Israel or Jews in general. Now, here is the legislation …
EXPLANATORY NOTE
The Bill requires the Government of Ontario to be guided by the working definition of antisemitism and the list of illustrative examples of it, adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance plenary on May 26, 2016, when it interprets Acts, regulations and policies designed to protect Ontarians from discrimination and hate amounting to antisemitism.
The Bill also amends the Legislation Act, 2006 to adopt that working definition.
Bill 168 2019
An Act to combat antisemitism
Preamble
Antisemitism is a multi-faceted problem that requires a multi-faceted strategy, encompassing a range of ministries and agencies. For that reason, it is desirable to require the Government of Ontario to implement a whole-of-government approach in combating antisemitism. As part of that approach, it is desirable to apply a consistent interpretation of Acts, regulations and policies designed to protect Ontarians from discrimination and hate amounting to antisemitism.
Therefore, Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Ontario, enacts as follows:
Interpretation
1 In interpreting Acts, regulations and policies designed to protect Ontarians from discrimination and hate amounting to antisemitism, the Government of Ontario shall be guided by the working definition of antisemitism and the list of illustrative examples of it adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance plenary on May 26, 2016.
Legislation Act, 2006 amendment
2 Section 87 of the Legislation Act, 2006 is amended by adding the following definition:
“antisemitism” has the meaning set out in the working definition of antisemitism and the list of illustrative examples of it adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance plenary on May 26, 2016; (antisémitisme”)
Commencement
3 This Act comes into force on the day it receives Royal Assent.
Short title
4 The short title of this Act is the Combating Antisemitism Act, 2019. _______________________ This definition means, that to avoid “anti-Semitism”, one must be prepared to lie and suppress or ignore facts.For instance, example 7 reads: “7. Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to thealleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.” Consider a spy and traitor like Jonathan Pollard who stole vital U.S. military secrets and gave them to Israel. He was clear in claiming a higher loyalty to Israe; than to the U.S. Is noting this fact now to be deemed “anti-Semitic.” Why do politicians in the U.S. and Canada trip over themselves at election time to proclaim their undying support for Israel? The answer is simple: Many Jews, not all of course, are extremely loyal to Israel. That’s a fact.And another weirdness. “Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such … Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.” is an example of anti-Semitism. There is no denying Jews have ownership and participation wildly out of proportion to their numbers in the North American media. Must this no longer be discussable in Ontario?
CBC journalist Wendy Mesley.File photo / Toronto Sun
Wendy Mesley was sacrificed on Tuesday at the altar of political correctness.
Her
40-year career as a stellar journalist with the CBC turned into ashes
as she was first backstabbed by her colleagues at work and then offered
by CBC management as a human sacrifice to vultures on a diet of cancel
culture.
The CBC story on its website reported: “Wendy Mesley suspended from hosting after using ‘careless’ language in discussing racial issue.”
It
left the clear impression that Mesley had uttered some racist remark on
air. At no place did the story elaborate what the “careless” language
was or that it was used in a staff meeting and that they were not
Mesley’s words.
“It was not aimed at anyone, I was quoting a
journalist we were intending to interview on a panel discussion about
coverage of racial inequality,” Mesley said in an apology statement
posted online.
The un-authored CBC story made no effort to clarify the ‘when’ and ‘where’ of the story.
Was Wendy Mesley the sacrificial lamb for other errors in CBC reporting and judgment that were documented at the original Canadaland story breaking the news about her?
Mesley’s
apology was not to the person who ratted on her, but to all of Canada.
She tweeted: “I hurt people and for that, I am very sorry. I am also
deeply ashamed.”
No, Wendy, you did not hurt anyone. You quoted someone and only that person, and she or he alone is responsible for those words.
I
can walk in the shoes of many activists who proclaim “Black Lives
Matter”, as I have done since the days of the Canadian Black Action
Defence Committee. I marched in the Million Man March, having lived as a
child in a climate of anti-Black racism that is ubiquitous in the
Indian subcontinent and the Arab World.
But none of that history justifies the depiction of Wendy Mesley as a racist.
Some
may consider it an exaggeration, but the slow strangulation of what is
permitted language in newspapers and broadcast networks across North
America is the death of journalism as we knew it.
Political
correctness, identity politics, cancel culture and “white guilt” have
combined to make the exercise of ‘objectivity’, hitherto the essential
device in a reporter’s toolbox, almost a swear word.
There was a time when opinion writing was reserved for those who had a decade or more of reporting in their pockets. No more.
Today,
the phenomenon of ‘activist journalism’ has been born. Free from the
supervision of an editor, these ‘journalists’ leap straight to ‘opinion
writing,’ never ever going through the rigours of covering the courts,
crime or natural disasters unless there was an ethnic or racial twist in
the story.
Truth be damned. The pressure is
on to bury the facts, lest it upset the sensibilities of guilt-ridden
left-wing whites. Notwithstanding the casualties they cause, political
correctness is the rule of the day for them.
The
CBC incident rings the memory of Winston Churchill’s speech on March 5,
1946, in Fulton, Missouri. Free from political correctness and No. 10
Downing Street, Churchill bellowed: “From Stettin in the Baltic, to
Trieste in the Adriatic, an ‘iron curtain’ has descended across the
continent, allowing police governments to rule Eastern Europe.”
Today,
from coast to coast to coast, another iron curtain has descended on
Canada, allowing ethnic vote banks to taint our politics and cut off
journalism from the principle of balance and objectivity, a situation
that leads to a defenceless and voiceless Wendy Mesley.
Take it from this man of colour, Wendy: You are not a racist, you are a journalist par excellence.
The cancel
culture mob came for the creator of Harry Potter this past week, but
J.K. Rowling was ready.
In fact, she has
set a perfect example of what to do when besieged by the Gender
Ideology Thought Police for “wrongthink.”
It started when
she tweeted the following:
Rowling dared to lampoon a key tactic of the woke gender
ideologists, that of replacing the accurate, biological term “women”,
with clumsy, inaccurate, woke terminology: “people who
menstruate”.
This language ultimately nullifies the existence of women,
and those who use it do not take kindly to mockery.
What happened next? Well, they attempted to “cancel” Rowling. She
was besieged with a torrent of denunciations, threats and abuse.
She was accused of “transphobia” far and wide.
Rowling responded with a long and articulate essay which eloquently
outlines her deep concerns about the threats that transgender activism
and gender ideology pose to the safety of actual girls and women.
I recommend you read it in its entirety here.
We’re all fortunate that J.K. Rowling is courageous enough to stand
up to the mob, which is used to being able to silence anyone who won’t
conform to their ideas. Rowling warns:
“Huge numbers of women are justifiably terrified by the
trans activists; I know this because so many have got in touch with me
to tell their stories. They’re afraid of doxing, of losing their jobs
or their livelihoods, and of violence.”
Rowling knows, like I do, that eradicating the reality of
biological sex and the differences between men and women will only
create danger for women and girls:
“When you throw open the doors of bathrooms and changing
rooms to any man who believes or feels he’s a woman…then you open
the door to any and all men who wish to come inside. That is the
simple truth.”
Rowling recognizes, as I do, that the suddenly fashionable idea of
transgenderism is sweeping through society like a mania, and young
girls are being pushed toward processes that will irrevocably harm
them:
“I’m concerned about the huge explosion in young women
wishing to transition and also about the increasing numbers who seem
to be detransitioning (returning to their original sex), because they
regret taking steps that have, in some cases, altered their bodies
irrevocably, and taken away their fertility.”
Do you agree,
Frederick?
Help me continue to be a loud voice
against the insanity of the woke gender
ideologists.
J.K. Rowling’s example of how to stand up to the organized pressure
of the radical left is one we should emulate. She clearly expresses
the truth that the trend of radical left gender politics has
sacrificed the rights of girls and women to security:
“I refuse to bow down to a movement that I believe is doing
demonstrable harm in seeking to erode ‘woman’ as a political and
biological class and offering cover to predators like few before
it.”
In Canada, we have our own problems with the onslaught of radical
left gender ideology. Bill C-16 has enshrined this notion, however
vaguely defined, in Canadian law.
The term “woman” has to mean something. But not in
Canada.
In 2017, Canada’s Parliament passed Bill C-16, a bill that
amended the Canadian Human Rights Act and enshrined “gender ideology”
into Canadian law.
Canada’s C-16 effectively legislates that “woman” means
nothing. “Female women” everywhere in Canada stand to suffer the
consequences of that.
I will stand up for women and fight back against gender
ideology by repealing Bill C-16.
I will also ban sex-changes for minors and vote against C-8, which
will imprison parents for attempting to help children accept the
bodies with which they were born.
Biological sex is real. The differences between women and
men are real.
Today,
June 1st, 2020, they are apparently re-opening the town of Jasper, but
with limitations and a suggestion to “bring your own covid kit”. That
means masks, hand-sanitizers and gloves. While the lock-down happened in
more places than just Jasper (big understatement – I know) the absurdity of it struck me as particularly acute there when I visited a few days ago.
31 May 2020
Dear Mayor Richard Ireland, and fellow Councillors,
On May 26, 2020 I visited my
old home town of Jasper. Where there should be bustling activity, I
found a ghost town. In front of the town entrances, signs scream go away
with the words “CRITICAL SERVICES ONLY!”. Upon entering a building, one
is commanded to first sanitize the hands before speaking.
Enough already!
This Corona hysteria is based on distortions, lies and
misrepresentations. By going along with the “authorities” and their
nonsensical “recommendations”, you are participating and propelling our
lemming walk into total police state / medical martial law. Surely you
know that there is much more going on with this response to the hyped up
plandemic (not a typo) than meets the eye on the television.
Mayor Ireland, what do you
mean by telling the public that your “backyard” is not ready yet? What
is it that needs to be ready? Why don’t you just tell the businesses,
the hotels and restaurants to open their doors. Put the Welcome mat out.
The rest will take care of itself.
Here are a few questions to think about.
How much sense does “social distancing” make, when in fact the isolation will weaken our immune systems?
Why are the so-called
authorities recommending wearing masks, when doing so for any length of
time is actually bad for your health? Not enough oxygen, too much carbon
dioxide, and breathing in your own air can lead to illness.
Is it just coincidence that
the hardest hit areas of Covid-19 happen to be the same areas where 5G
has been rolled out? (Remember Wuhan?) And is it just coincidence that
EMF radiation causes the same symptoms as Covid-19 is said to cause?
Did you know that the tests for this
Corona virus do not actually test specifically for Covid-19? They test
for exosomes, which are essentially genetic material. During the course
of the test, they double the material and keep on doubling it until they
arbitrarily decide they have amplified the material enough. Any one of
us could test positive some days, negative other days, quite randomly
and depending how many times the testers double our material. This means
that there are many false positives. Does this not make the tests
meaningless?
Were you aware that doctors
and nurses are pressured to write Covid19 on death certificates, even
if the patient died of other causes? And did you know that they need
only suspect that the patient had Covid19? They do not even have to test
for it. It seems that almost everybody who dies these days has Covid19
on their death certificate. Why are doctors pressured into making this
diagnosis? Might there be an ulterior agenda?
Even if we assume “social
distancing” works, how does it make sense to close outdoor spaces, when
in fact it would be easiest to practice “social distancing” outside?
Do you think it is good for
the children’s health to traumatize them and terrorize them with this
big bad bogeyman of a disease? How many children have died of Covid19?
Are you aware that the stress of fear, especially constant fear, is bad
for our health?
Even if you believe the
numbers, is this disease really that deadly? Why did they not lock down
and shut down the world during flu season every single year? Many people
die of the annual flu, especially old people. I hear that in Alberta
the average age of death with Covid19 is 83. Is this good reason to
destroy small businesses, shut down schools, and put everyone in a state
of fear?
They tell us that you can
have the disease, then recover, but that you can then get it again. They
also tell us that the vaccination will carry the virus and that is
supposed to make us immune. How does that make sense?
Why do small businesses get
shut down while large businesses remain open? Are small family run
businesses more prone to spreading disease than the Walmart and Safeway
stores?
Do you think it is good and
right that old people in care homes are forbidden from seeing their
loved ones, just in their moment of need, sometimes at end of life?
Why is it that meat packing
plants and other food producers seem to be disproportionately hit with
outbreaks (or so they tell us)? Why are they dumping milk and telling
farmers in some regions to plow their crops under? It would not be the
first deliberately induced famine – just research the Holodomor.
Have you ever heard of
predictive programming? And have you heard of Event 201? That was a
planning event for a Corona virus pandemic, held in October 2019. Have
you heard of Agenda 21?
Do you believe everything they tell us is true?
I could go on with more
questions about this Corona virus “pandemic”, but those will suffice as
“food for thought”. I have looked into this, and have come to the
conclusion that what we are witnessing is nothing less than the
implementation of a New World Order, and it is pure communism. If they
succeed, it will be a tyrannical one-world-government police state in
which our every move will be monitored, controlled and dictated. We will
be slaves in a dystopia. We will be force vaccinated, and the vaccine
will not be good for us.
Let us look at the local health scene in Jasper as it relates to this so-called virus. It will provide us with an excellent example of how reality is distorted.
In Jasper there were 9 cases
of Covid19. Eight recovered and one died so far. The man who died had a
tube up his nose and schlepped his oxygen tank around with him long
before this so-called pandemic began. He was 86 years old when he died.
His health was extremely compromised already. Yet he makes up the
statistic of Covid19 death in Jasper. Repeat that scenario everywhere.
That is a typical story, not the exception.
On May 26, the day I was in
Jasper, there was one patient in the hospital. And yet we are left with
the impression from the mass media that health care workers are
over-worked. Again, repeat that scenario everywhere. Hospitals are
largely empty.
Who are these authorities who are giving out the orders? They have no authority over us!
They have acquired their so-called authority through deception and
crime. When we obey that ill-begotten authority, we give them
legitimacy. They do NOT have our best interests at heart. They are
destroying us.
Fear is a powerful control tool. So is the money they are handing out, to keep everyone calm, docile, and quiet. For now.
Already they speak of the
second wave (and third… and fourth…). It is all planned. Like a Boa
Constrictor tightens its grip just when the intended prey exhales in
order to take a new breath, this is how the New World Order is being
implemented. Relax a little, then lock down harder, and harder,
squeezing the last breath of life / freedom out.
By “obeying” the insane
lockdown and social distancing measures, we are willingly walking into
this dystopian nightmare. If we are too stupid to recognize it, maybe we
deserve it? No! Millions are awake to the agenda, but the quislings still go along with their puppet-masters.
You are in a position to say NO to the “orders”. Those orders are not laws. They are recommendations, and even if they were laws, they would not be legitimate. We can ALL just say no, in fact we MUST say no to this, in order to survive as a people. We owe this to our children and grandchildren.
Your children and
grandchildren will talk to you from the future, a future where every
move and every breath and every conversation is controlled and
monitored, and a future in which they quite possibly are hungry, they
will ask you: “Ma, Pa, Grandma, Grandpa, what did you do in 2020?”
And you will say: “I obeyed the health authorities, and I obeyed the government. I trusted them.”
Wake up! Resist this tyranny! We will take back our world! Work, play, and gather again. Shed our fear. That’s enough idiocy. Let’s get back to living again.
If we stop consenting to our enslavement, then it will not happen. We are many. They are few.
Sincerely,
Monika Schaefer
P.S. This wonderful piece of satire was not in the original email letter, but adding it here for my readers. Enjoy!
