Ontario Legislature Smashes Free Speech & Thought, Gives Second Reading to Bill 168 & Makes Criticism of Jews Illegal & An Action to Be Fought
If you’re nostalgic for the early days of communism’s reign of terror is Russia, move to Ontario and see such thought tyranny at work. Of course, there are not public executions, yet in Ontario. It’s still tyranny light. Early in the 1920s, the communist dictatorship in Russia enacted a law making “anti-semitism” a crime punishable by death. The regime had much to hide. Russian communism was largely created by Jewish radicals and the early elite of commissars was top heavy with Jews. Those were facts. To state them, though, was “anti-Semitism” and earned you a death sentence.
Sadly, the Progressive Conservative government of Doug Ford — don’t let the”conservative” in the name fool you — has adopted a self-serving Jewish definition of “anti-Semitism” that neatly makes almost any criticism of Jews “anti-semitic” and, therefore, something the Ontario government is dedicated to fighting.
Firstly, one may ask why a government should be fighting any ideology– anti-Semitism, flat earthism or anything else. The province is so deeply in debt that if should have a single penny to waste currying favour with a tiny minority
The Ford government just gave second reading to Bill 168 to fight “Anti-Semitism”. It’s scary awful. Firstly, the DEFINITION of Anti-Semitism they’re using is the one they used to screw Dr. James Sears, editor, and Leroy St. Germaine, publisher of YOUR WARD NEWS, which they are fighting to overturn. It comes from the “International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance”.
Here is what the bill says:
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools,
the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the
overall context, include, but are not limited to:
1. Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in
the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
2. Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical
allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such
as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish
conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other
societal institutions.
3. Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined
wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts
committed by non-Jews.
4. Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or
intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of
National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World
War II (the Holocaust).
5. Adopt the following non-legally binding working definition of
antisemitism:“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be
expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of
antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or
their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious
facilities.”
6. Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or
exaggerating the Holocaust.
7. Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the
alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own
nations.
8. Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by
claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
9. Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or
demanded of any other democratic nation.
10. Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism
(e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel
or Israelis.
11. Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
12. Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state
As you can see, there is room here to persecute people for legitimate criticism
of Israel or Jews in general. Now, here is the legislation …
EXPLANATORY NOTE
The Bill requires the Government of Ontario to be guided by the working
definition of antisemitism and the list of illustrative examples of it,
adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance plenary on May
26, 2016, when it interprets Acts, regulations and policies designed to
protect Ontarians from discrimination and hate amounting to antisemitism.
The Bill also amends the Legislation Act, 2006 to adopt that working
definition.
Bill 168 2019
An Act to combat antisemitism
Preamble
Antisemitism is a multi-faceted problem that requires a multi-faceted
strategy, encompassing a range of ministries and agencies. For that
reason, it is desirable to require the Government of Ontario to implement
a whole-of-government approach in combating antisemitism. As part of that
approach, it is desirable to apply a consistent interpretation of Acts,
regulations and policies designed to protect Ontarians from discrimination
and hate amounting to antisemitism.
Therefore, Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the
Legislative Assembly of the Province of Ontario, enacts as follows:
Interpretation
1 In interpreting Acts, regulations and policies designed to protect
Ontarians from discrimination and hate amounting to antisemitism, the
Government of Ontario shall be guided by the working definition of
antisemitism and the list of illustrative examples of it adopted by the
International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance plenary on May 26, 2016.
Legislation Act, 2006 amendment
2 Section 87 of the Legislation Act, 2006 is amended by adding the
following definition:
“antisemitism” has the meaning set out in the working definition of
antisemitism and the list of illustrative examples of it adopted by the
International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance plenary on May 26, 2016;
(antisémitisme”)
Commencement
3 This Act comes into force on the day it receives Royal Assent.
Short title
4 The short title of this Act is the Combating Antisemitism Act, 2019.
_______________________
This definition means, that to avoid “anti-Semitism”, one must be prepared to lie and suppress or ignore facts.For instance, example 7 reads: “7. Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to thealleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.” Consider a spy and traitor like Jonathan Pollard who stole vital U.S. military secrets and gave them to Israel. He was clear in claiming a higher loyalty to Israe; than to the U.S. Is noting this fact now to be deemed “anti-Semitic.” Why do politicians in the U.S. and Canada trip over themselves at election time to proclaim their undying support for Israel? The answer is simple: Many Jews, not all of course, are extremely loyal to Israel. That’s a fact.And another weirdness. “Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such … Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.” is an example of anti-Semitism. There is no denying Jews have ownership and participation wildly out of proportion to their numbers in the North American media. Must this no longer be discussable in Ontario?