Banks As Agents of Anti-Christian Change
— Paul Fromm’s talk at the Social Credit Conference in Rougemont, Quebec, May 21, 2026
https://cright.org/video/2026/
Banks As Agents of Anti-Christian Change
Discusses the Sad State of Free Speech in Canada with William Finck of Christogenea
Paul Fromm Discusses the Sad State of Free Speech in Canada with William Finck of Christogenea
https://christogenea.org/event/tonight-paul-fromm-and-free-speech-canadaPaul Fromm has been an advocate for free speech in Canada for many years. There’s a video posted of a David Irving speech at the University of Toronto where he had introduced Irving, and I think that was in 1992. Paul had assisted the defence in the Canadian trial of Ernst Zündel in the late 1980’s, and he was also involved in the Terry Tremaine case in 2006.
MORE GERMAN BASHING: TAXPAYER FUNDED CBC’S IDEAS PROGRAMME DEFAMES MONIKA SCHAEFER’S FATHER
To the CBC Ombudsman,
2026 June 23
Defamatory statements were made about Dr. Otto Schaefer during a recent CBC radio program, for which there was a complete lack of hard data and evidence. I am asking that the CBC make a formal retraction and a public apology for slander.
I happened to tune in to the tail end of the CBC radio program called IDEAS on May 12th, 2026. Imagine my surprise when I heard my father’s name Otto Schaefer being spoken, and then the shock when I realized that he was being smeared. I heard things being said about my father which I knew to be false and unfounded. As soon as the program finished, I searched online and found the show in the CBC radio archive for that day and was able to listen to the entire broadcast. It was called “How Canada forgot it once had a segregated health system”, and the host was Nahlah Ayed. The discussion revolved around a book written by the late Elaine Dewar called “Oblivious: Residential Schools, Segregated Hospitals, and the use of Indigenous People as Slaves of Race Science”. Elaine Dewar had been interviewed shortly before she died, and the voice of her daughter and others who attended the recent book launch (posthumously for the author) were heard as well.
Otto Schaefer worked for many years at the Charles Camsell Hospital in Edmonton, and he was the founding Director of the Northern Medical Research Unit of the Department of National Health and Welfare Canada during the nineteen-sixties, seventies and eighties. He dedicated his life to the health and wellbeing of the aboriginal peoples of the north, in particular the Inuit. But because of my father’s country of origin – Germany ‒ and because of the time during which he attained his medical degree ‒ WW2 ‒ Elaine Dewar made assumptions about his motivation and about his goals, none of which she could verify. In her own words, all her red flags went up when she saw his name and learned from where and whence he came, because she was “a Jewish girl”. The host had introduced her as a Holocaust survivor one generation removed.
During the program the term “medical experiments” was used repeatedly, thus invoking rather sinister images. Conducting research on the health of the Inuit during a time of rapid changes in their lifestyle and nutrition is a very different thing from doing “medical experimentation”.
Elaine Dewar characterized Otto Schaefer’s research as “nonsense studies”. For example, she scoffed at his study of differing alcohol metabolic rates in different peoples. It just so happens that my father’s motivation to study this came after he found that the Whitehorse police were consistently releasing Caucasians from the “drunk tank” sooner than the Indians, after collecting the drunks off the streets the night before. (Presumably they were being protected from violence or from freezing to death in case they passed out on a cold winter night.) Schaefer complained to the police that they were being racist, always letting the White guys out first. So the Police Chief invited him, “Otto, please come tomorrow morning, and you make the determination whom to let out, and when.” Lo and behold, Otto found that the Whites were completely sober, but the Indians were still drunk in the morning. My father, having a curious mind and being very scientifically oriented, then set out to determine why this was so.
By coincidence some years later, a Swedish acquaintance of mine wrote to ask me if there was any connection between myself and Dr. Otto Schaefer, and I proudly told him that I was his daughter. This man had come across Schaefer’s ground-breaking research which explained the differences in metabolic processes between races on account of different enzymes which were either present or not. It seems to me this information is actually quite important. But according to Elaine Dewar, this was a “nonsense study”. And she called it racist. Ironically, it was my father’s concern about police racism which led him to conduct the study.
Elaine Dewar also spoke about the fact that Schaefer was the organizer of “so-called consent”, again, mocking him. She said that whichever language he was speaking [he spoke German, English, Inuktitut, and French], “everyone said it all sounded German anyway, so nobody could understand him.” Therefore she concluded that their informed consent was meaningless.
I can surmise wherefrom Dewar got this idea. It so happens that our family donated all of Otto Schaefer’s papers, books, slides, and journals to the University of Alberta. We felt that his important life’s work would be of greater use there than in one of his children’s basements. [Would we do that if we had any doubt about his impeccable character and integrity?] Elaine Dewar had access to all those donated materials. So, what might she have found that led her to the above mockery?
My father was a very humble man, and he liked to tell a self-deprecating humorous story about one of his lectures which he had delivered in French. He had started his talk with an apology for his imperfect French. A colleague in the audience quipped in a joking manner, “that’s okay Otto, it all sounds German anyway!” and everyone laughed. My father kept detailed journals and I imagine this was in one of those journals which Dewar had read.
Otto worked very hard at learning Inuktitut, the native language of the Inuit. He also made use of interpreters, to be certain of clear communication. The very doctor who was responsible for and insistent upon the informed consent protocol was now being slandered by Elaine Dewar as having done exactly the opposite. She had no hard data for her defamation of a much-loved and respected doctor. I say much-loved, because I was astonished and moved by the volume of tributes and letters we received from the north, from the Inuit people themselves, after his death in 2009. It was clear that they dearly loved my father.
Otto Schaefer quarrelled many times with his boss, the Deputy Minister for Northern and Indian Affairs, because he was constantly advocating for the Inuit. He was a man of integrity and compassion. He had great respect for the Native people and their ability to survive and thrive in such a harsh environment. When he saw injustice, he sought to rectify the situation.
In 2021 there were rumours and allegations about medical experiments and bodies buried on the grounds of the Charles Camsell hospital. The owner of the former hospital conducted an investigation. He excavated the grounds and found nothing. However, it leaves me to wonder if Dewar was still affected by those false rumours when she made her unsubstantiated remarks about “experiments”.
The Canadian government apology to the Inuit just over a year-and-a-half ago for the alleged slaughter of a thousand sled dogs during the 1950s and 60s has relevance to this current complaint. I wrote a letter at that time to the CBC but never received a response. Here is the link to the article I published, which includes my letter: https://freespeechmonika.com/another-canadian-apology-for-alleged-wrongs-the-slaughter-of-inuit-sled-dogs/
The obituary which appeared in the International Journal of Circumpolar Health is far more indicative of my father’s work and character, than the speculative, biased and prejudiced characterizations made by Elaine Dewar. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.3402/ijch.v68i5.17600?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
The IDEAS program “How Canada forgot it once had a segregated health system” has put a blot on the reputation of my father. That stain must be removed. The CBC must publicly retract the defamatory statements made on that program, and make a public apology for having allowed all those unsubstantiated statements and accusations against the late Dr. Otto Schaefer.
I look forward to a positive response about this serious matter.
Sincerely,
Monika Schaefer
P.O. Box 516
McBride, BC V0J 2E0
250-569-7024
BILL WHATCOTT UPDATE
Whatcott, June 21, 2026 Activist Update
Video of Bill and a number of local Christians preaching to sodomites and transvestites at a pervertfest in Racine Wisconson
Dear Freinds,
Please pray for travel mercies as I head back to Alberta tomorrow. I had a very fruitful time ministering to the unborn and sodomites in the state of Wisconsin. This trip through the United States on my way back from my latest so-called “hate crime” trial has really brought home to me how much Canada and the United States have drifted apart. Since, I have been away, Canada has passed Bill C-9 banning so-called hate symbols and removing the “good faith” religious defense when one is charged with Wilful Promotion of Hatred.
During the last 10 years Liberal governments have been incrementally chipping away at fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, property rights and especially firearms rights, and expanding fake rights such as euthanasia, sexual deviance, and legalized (sometimes taxpayer funded), illicit drug use. Canada is a darker, less prosperous place than it use to be. Being in the USA there is work to do to keep the nation free and morally coherent (as evidenced in the video and pictures above), but there is a more receptive public and a freer atmosphere politically to share the law and Gospel.
Please pray for me as I await my final court judgment on September 16, 2026 at the University Park Courthouse in Toronto. I believe I lost this time; even though I had the so-called religious defense it was obvious to me that it was worth very little when Justice Molloy opined “you can’t rely on a good faith religious argument when you are clearly not acting with good faith by promoting hate.” Strangely, hate in this context is telling sodomites to keep their pants up as their favourite sex practices puts them and others at high risk of a host of maladies that I listed in my flyer at the 2016 Toronto sodomite parade and got prosecuted for. Such is the sorry state of Canada and its judiciary.
Protect Children: Remove Pride and Gender Events from Our Libraries
Protect Children: Remove Pride and Gender Events from Our Libraries
CitizenGO – started this petition to Toronto Public Library Board: Alim Remtulla (Chair), Jonathan Hoss (Vice Chair), Sakariya Ahmed, Deputy Mayors Paul Ainslie & Amber Morley, Tamara Balan, Serda Evren, Ben Liu, Amina Mohamed, Soo Wong – 2026/06/17
Your tax dollars are paying for drag performers to entertain toddlers – and you probably had no idea.
The Toronto Public Library’s own event catalogue tells the story plainly. As of June 10, 2026, TPL lists 41 Pride, drag, and gender-identity events for Preschool Children aged 0 to 5:
Drag Bingo, Drag Story Time with Messy Margaret, Fay and Fluffy’s Storytime, and a Library Pride Parade for babies as young as zero.
Another 29 events target children aged 6 to 12.
These listings were not compiled by outside critics; they were categorized by library staff in the library’s searchable database using the library’s age categories.
The performers behind these events have been remarkably candid about their purpose. Messy Margaret told a Toronto newspaper last year that his mission at these library storytimes is to ensure children know becoming a drag queen is an option for them, because he believes at least one child in every room will grow up to question their sexuality, and he wants to make sure that child sees drag as a path. Fay and Fluffy’s own published mission makes the same agenda explicit: their storytime targets what they call “gender-variant children.”
These are not neutral performers who happen to read picture books; they are activists with a stated goal, and TPL has been handing them a publicly funded platform to pursue it since at least 2017.
A child of two cannot weigh adult identity messaging.
Libraries already separate children’s, teen, and adult content in every other programming context, and there is no reason that standard should not apply here. The case for pulling these events is straightforward: publicly funded children’s programming should not be a platform for performers who have openly declared their goal is to indoctrinate children into their own sexually explicit lifestyles.
The accountability runs deeper than it might appear.
Two of the ten people on the TPL Board are not library appointees; they are elected city councillors. Deputy Mayor Paul Ainslie and Deputy Mayor Amber Morley sit on this Board as sitting members of City Council, answerable to ward voters, and this October every seat on Toronto City Council is up for re-election.
A Board member who also holds elected office has every reason to want this resolved before it becomes a ballot question, and a petition with thousands of names is exactly the kind of constituent signal that does not get quietly filed away.
The programming runs through June and July.
Once these events pass off the calendar, the window for pressure closes.
Sign this petition now and tell Chair Alim Remtulla, Vice-Chair Jonathan Hoss, Sakariya Ahmed, Deputy Mayor Paul Ainslie, Tamara Balan, Serda Evren, Ben Liu, Amina Mohamed, Deputy Mayor Amber Morley, and Soo Wong to remove all Pride, drag, and gender-identity programming from Toronto Public Libraries.
Sources:
TPL 2SLGBTQ+ events filtered for Preschool Children (0-5)
Fay & Fluffy’s Storytime: Reading is FUNdamental – The 519
CitizenGO previous campaign — Messy Margaret at TPL
CitizenGO previous campaign — Toronto Public Library: Cancel Drag Storytime and Protect Our Children
HAMILTON’S SOCIALIST MAYOR & ASSORTED OPPONENTS OF FREE SPEECH SEEK TO STOP DOMINION SOCIETY’S IMMIGRATION CONFERENCE`
HAMILTON’S SOCIALIST MAYOR & ASSORTED OPPONENTS OF FREE SPEECH SEEK TO STOP DOMINION SOCIETY’S IMMIGRATION CONFERENCE`
[Hamilton’s socialist Mayor Andrea Horwath may proclaim tolerance, but not of dissenting views on immigration. Note how “anti-racism” is not only a code word for anti-White, but also anti-free speech. The fatuous Mayor even talks of denying the Dominion Society the right to meet in public spaces. But listen, you dumpy tyrants, they’re PUBLIC, meaning belonging to all of us. Notice that the Mayor smears criticism of Canada’s catastrophic policy of immigration replacement as “hate”.]
`Strategy’ forming to oppose anti-immigration group
Local antiracism network coordinates municipal response as controversial `nationalist’ group plans event in Hamilton in August
- The Hamilton Spectator
- 13 Jun 2026
- FALLON HEWITT REPORTER FALLON HEWITT IS A REPORTER AT THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR. FHEWITT@TORSTAR.CA
Hamilton’s socialist Mayor Andrea Horwath may proclaim
tolerance, but not of dissenting views on immigration. Note how
“anti-racism” is not only a code word for anti-White, but also
anti-free speech. The fatuous Mayor even talks of denying the
Dominion Society the right to meet in public spaces. But listen,
you dumpy tyrants, they’re PUBLIC, meaning belonging to all of
us. Notice that the Mayor smears criticism of Canada’s
catastrophic policy of immigration replacement as “hate”.
“Local anti-racism network coordinates municipal response as
controversial `nationalist’ group plans event in Hamilton in
August. Mayor Andrea Horwath says she will be ensuring the
city ‘remains vigilant and clear that events spreading messages of
hate and intolerance are not welcome’ in city facilities or public
spaces. A controversial anti-immigration group is planning to
host a national conference in the Hamilton area this summer —
prompting local anti-racism organizations to work on a
“collaborative strategy” to respond.
The Dominion Society of Canada announced in May that it
would be hosting its first national conference, known as
“DomCon,” in the Hamilton area on Aug. 29. The group publicly
calls for the “remigration” — or mass deportation — of anyone
not descended from Anglo or French settlers of Canada. The
society’s website blames “mass immigration” for low wages, a
lack of jobs and housing, as well as overstretched healthcare and
education systems.
On its website, the Dominion Society explicitly bases its
platform on the “Great Replacement” theory, stating that “native
born Canadians are being replaced in our own domestic
workforce” and calling for an “11step plan” to enforce “the
return of foreigners to their respective homelands.” The group’s
literature targets specific demographics, writing that “Canada is
not getting more `diverse,’ it’s getting more Indian.” The
Canadian Anti-Hate Network has characterized the
organization as the political wing of a broader white nationalist
movement. …
Lyndon George, executive director of the Hamilton Anti-
Racism Resource Centre (HARRC), [who is Black] told The
Spectator his team learned of the event in late May, spurring a
meeting with leaders from the Hamilton Centre for Civic
Inclusion and the Social Planning and Research Council of
Hamilton to create a “collaborative strategy.”
George said part of that strategy includes local organizations
working with the city and nearby municipalities to ensure they
understand “signs of hate,” and to provide information to
restaurants and venues on how the group “may be operating and
disguising their bookings.”
George also called on area politicians and economic development
departments to make it clear that Hamilton and the surrounding
regions are “not a welcoming environment for” anti-immigration
and White nationalist groups. “This is not a group that you want
to welcome here,” said George. “But this is not something that
the community can take on alone.” (Hamilton Spectator, June
13, 2026) Notice that the Hamilton Centre for Civic inclusion
is plotting to find ways to exclude the Dominion Society. You
can’t make this stuff up!
KELOWNA FREEDOM RALLY, JUNE 13 2026
Political Prisoner Brad Love Released After 26 Days in Jail
Political Prisoner Released After 26 Days in Jail
EDMONTON. June 9, 2026. Today after a short court appearance, political prisoner Brad Love was released and told all charges would be dropped at a further court appearance in two weeks.
“I was scooped and spent 26 days in prison for nothing,” an angry Mr. Love told CAFE. He’d been arrested May 13 at his Fort McMurray residence, not allowed to get his pants or wallet or ID. He spent the first night in an RCMP cell in Fort McMurray without blankets on the concrete cell floor. Four days later he was transferred to Edmonton Remand Centre five hours away.
The charges were “breach of probation” for trespassing on some woman’s lawn and whacking a security camera with a stick. Mr. Love denied the charges and said bus transfers would prove he was elsewhere at the time of the alleged incidents. The RCMP who make a habit of harassing the outspoken free thinker slapped the handcuffs on anyway.
In court today, the Crown admitted that the video of the event confirmed that the whacker with a stick was not Mr. Love and a “witness” had recanted.
Fort McMurray is awash in drugs, Indian public drunkenness is a scandal and White tweekers, Indian drunks and numerous Third World newcomers fail to pay bus fare, but the local RCMP are fixated on Bad Love. After his arrest, they entered his dwelling, apparently, without a warrant and questioned his room mates as to whether Mr. Love made racial remarks. Whether he does or doesn’t is irrelevant to the bogus charges at issue.
Mr. Love described his release. He had $1,500 in his canteen — his money transferred by family members. The prison authorities would only hand over $500, the rest to come later. {How can they get away with this?] So, with no ID or credit card, Mr. Love had to find his way back to Fort McMurray. With no ID, he couldn’t board a plane. Finally, he persuaded a cab driver to accept $500, with the remaining $300 on arrival.
Of the 35 inmates released with Mr. Love, 25 were Indians. None had money. They were given bus passes to head downtown to the Indian Friendship Centre.
Whatcott’s so-called”hate crime” trial ends and his thoughts as he awaits judgment
Whatcott’s so-called”hate crime” trial ends and his thoughts as he awaits judgment
Irony. This plaque is located at the Ontario Superior Court, 361 University St, Toronto, the courthouse where I think the freedom to speak against the sodomite agenda will literally cease to exist.
Dear Friend’s,
My trial is over now. I had one friend show up for my last day from Hamilton. The drive from Hamilton to Toronto was terrible. It took him 3 hours in the gridlock, but it was a blessing to have one guy in what was otherwise a mostly hostile court gallery.
In theory, truth is a defense in criminal hate speech cases and so is religion. It seemed to me when we advanced those two defenses in closing arguments they held little weight. I hope I am wrong, but I am not optimistic.
Towards the very end of the hearing when the Crown and my defense were making their their closing arguments, my lawyer pointed out that my Gospel flyer was devoid of any violent language. Justice Molloy challenged my lawyer and read the last paragraph at the bottom of my Gospel flyer:
“Natural law is clear, homosexuality is incompatible with human nature. Disease, death and confusion are the sad and sordid realities of the homosexual lifestyle. The “Gay Zombies” are concerned about the spiritual, psychological and physical welfare of all potential homosexual pride attendees, so we want to give you this accurate information and encourage you to abstain from the homosexuality.”
In the above chapter at the end of my flyer, the Crown argued and the judge also seemed to agree there are clear “Hallmarks of Hate,” namely my warning that “disease, death and confusion” are the sad and sordid realities of the homosexual lifestyle.” Of course, I believe the above statement to be true based on my firsthand experience as a downtown Toronto homecare nurse and also having lived in Downtown Toronto for 10 years during the 1990’s and observing the not so “gay” scene. I know for certain Toronto’s “gay” scene isn’t all that happy, but the kink, drug use, domestic violence, higher than average suicide rate, promiscuity, etc…. is indeed “sad, sordid and confusing.” However, no matter how well backed up by facts and sincere argument the above statement is, I believe as of September 16th of this year the Ontario Superior Court will find this statement to be a criminal offense based on their Supreme Court of Canada Whatcott Decision “Hallmarks of Hatred” test. Truth and reality will be ignored.
Another very troubling statement from the judge was when she was pushing back against my counsel’s argument that my flyer wasn’t violent of genocidal. The judge read aloud, “We want to give you this accurate information and encourage you to abstain from the homosexuality.” The judge then opinionated that this statement is evidence I want to eradicate homosexuals. My lawyer countered I am a conservative Christian and I am speaking out against sexual behaviour that is contrary to Christianity. The judge articulated a very mainstream (in Canadian legal circles) dogma that one’s preferred sexual behaviour is intrinsic to one’s being and therefore in this sense if I criticize homosexual sexual practices, I deny their being and the judge somehow extrapolated my sentence to being a call to genocide.
Molloy’s reasoning on sodomy being intrinsic to a homosexual’s identity and therefore my flyer is genocidal, is actually similar to the reasoning of those who call the government’s church run Indian Residential School system a genocide. Which even though the schools have a homicide rate of exactly 0 in over a century of existence, it is still a matter of orthodoxy in Canadian legal circles to believe a genocide, or at least a “cultural genocide,” occurred. The evidence of this “genocide” being the religious folks working in the schools believed the native kids would benefit from a Christian education and believing the kids would do well to learn skills that enabled them to work and prosper in the white European Christian culture that took root in Canada.
In much the same way I expect Molloy based on her comments today will find telling homosexual identified men to abstain from sodomy and advocating for this position in the public square will be found to be “genocidal hate speech.” Sadly, sharing the Gospel while lifesaving in God’s economy will hold little weight in terms of being a religious defense.
Another concerning exchange between my counsel and the judge was when my lawyer argued I toned down my flyer at the 2016 Toronto sodomite pride parade, when compared to my flyers arguing against the promotion of homosexuality in Saskatchewan’s Public Schools back in 2001. My 2001 flyers were the centre of the 2013 Whatcott Supreme Court Decision and they were entered as evidence in my current hate crime trial. My lawyer argued my toned down flyer was an attempt to comply with Canada’s hate crime law and evidence I lacked “intent” to break the law. Justice Molloy replied “Ignorance of the law is no defense. Just because Mr. Whatcott tried to see how far he could go without going over the line, that won’t save him from conviction if he did go over the line.”
Molloy’s reasoning actually makes sense in normal criminal cases. If you have a vindictive neighbour who is trying to make your life a living hell by swearing at you when you are relaxing in your backyard, and parking their car in front of your driveway to block you from entering or leaving, and getting their dog to poop on your front lawn in an effort to upset you; if you complain to the police and the police warn your neighbour they are going to face a Mischief charge if they keep harassing you, and your neighbour quits the above behaviour to avoid the criminal charge, but resorts to blasting you with loud music at 2:00 am to keep up the harassment, it is indeed reasonable for the court to find guilt and convict your neighbour. Even though the malicious neighbour modified their behaviour somewhat in an attempt to avoid charges, their ignorance of the law is no defense; they clearly wanted to continue in unlawful and malicious harassment, and they went over a clear line when they didn’t cease their harassment campaign completely.
The problem I see with what I perceive to be Molloy’s view of my anti-sodomite Gospel flyer is she perceives my criticism of the sodomite agenda to be in the same league as the malicious neighbour making his peaceful neighbour’s life a living hell. Molloy and Canada’s legal establishment have chosen Wilful Blindness rather than acknowledging the fact there is no clear line between so-called “hate speech” and “free speech.” For those who read my 2016 Gospel flyer (I can’t link to it, but it is on MassResistance’s website”) it should become clear there is no discernable line to stay under when debating the morality and potential harms of the homosexual agenda in Canada. Once I am convicted for distributing this Gospel flyer, the only safe line to avoid a so-called hate crime charge will be to stay quiet and let homosexual activists do what they want, no matter how perverse or anti-social.
It is unfortunate our courts and federal government have made it dogma that sexual orientation is innate and unchangeable. In reality when one looks at humanity from the viewpoint of being God’s creation, it is clear human beings are innately heterosexual, and our biological sexes are male and female and unchangeable. While it is clear to me that God made us heterosexual, it is paradoxically clear (I would argue because of the fall, see Genesis 3) sexual preference really isn’t immutable. Humanity has known for thousands of years sexual behaviour is malleable for better or worse.
Christianity has known since its earliest existence sexual behaviour can change for the worse and then for the better. The early Christian church’s practice was to welcome repentant homosexuals, repentant adulterers, and repentant incest practitioners, as well as others… back to Christ and His Church when the sinner wished to turn away from their destructive sexual behaviour.
“Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God. And such were some of you. But you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus and by the Spirit of our God.” 1 Corinthians 6:9-11
While Canada’s legal class insists so-called sexual orientation never changes, Christ has called broken sexual sinners of all shapes and sizes back to Himself. In my seminary class back in the 1990s I remember reading about Martin Luther dealing with someone caught up in bestiality who was arguing he didn’t know bestiality was a sin. I believe the guy was turned over to civil authorities, but Luther was still concerned about the guy’s spiritual condition. Thankfully, “born that way” wasn’t a thing during the Reformation.
One of the most powerful testimonies for me is Dennis Jernigan. He left homosexuality in 1981, married his wife Melinda in 1983, and God blessed them with 9 children. Today Dennis is dealing with Parkinson’s disease but is still active in his ministry and is still married to his wife of 43 years. “Gay” dogma says Dennis’ story is impossible, he was born “gay,” and is simply living in denial.
Here is Dennis’ powerful conversion story: https://www.dennisjernigan.com/djs-story
Strangely, while Canada’s “legal class” refuses to accept that Dennis Jernigan truly changed his sexual behaviour, they uncritically accept Ronan Oger’s self-described “conversion.” Ronan was a heterosexual man for the first 44 years of his life. I found a Vancouver Sun article on Ronan in the early 2000’s that called him “Dad.” This was before Ronan became a well-known trans activist. Ronan’s very male picture was simply a part of a story on a childhood immunization clinic and Ronan at that time of his life was a normal looking dad who brought his child to a clinic to be immunized.
At age 44 Ronan Oger discovered he was “really born a woman.” Shortly after becoming a fake woman, Ronan renamed himself “Morgane,” bilked his wife out of $100,000, left her, moved in with another woman and declared himself a “lesbian.”
Ronan called himself a “dad,” but now he thinks he is a mom and is living his life as a self-described “lesbian.” If you question this absurd narrative (as I did) you can be hit with a $55,000 fine by the BC Human Rights Tribunal, or even a criminal hate crime charge as free speech protection vanishes in Canada.
Canada’s officialdom will not accept clear evidence (Dennis’ own testimony, 43 years of marriage to the same woman, 9 children) that Dennis not only rejected the homosexual lifestyle, but that through the grace and power of the resurrected Christ that Dennis is a new creation and is in fact comfortable living as God intends him to live. In Dennis’ case he is called to live in a lifelong heterosexual marriage. By contrast the government uncritically accepts the testimony of an obvious heterosexual male grifter, Mr. Ronan Oger, that he is a woman (even though all evidence is he is a biological male) and he is also a lesbian. If you publicly challenge Ronan’s self-proclaimed identity you can face human rights complaints and potentially criminal charges.
With the above in mind the judgment day for my so-called “hate crime” decision will be September 16, 2026…..
Canada’s pro-life and conservative media has decided not to cover this trial.
CBC French showed up again today. They definitely were not cheerleaders for my cause, but this article is more balanced and less libelous than last week’s coverage of my trial: https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/2259031/proces-discours-haineux-libelle-homosexuels
In the end I believe I did the best I could with what I had, and I believe God called me to defend the truth I defended in the public square about His definition of morality, marriage, and sexuality.
Homosexual/transgender unGodly Pride flag over the front desk at Runnymede and Bloor public Library.
I believe LGBTQ ideology is a god/idol in Canada. The way it is worshipped, promoted, protected, and the ferocity of our courts and other government agencies in shutting down the detractors of this religion, indeed points to the cult like religious worship of LGBTQ by its Canadian adherents. I did speak out against this idol at the Toronto Sodom parade in 2016 and defended God’s truth in court right up to today. The past 10 years was hard and sometimes could be lonely, but I believe I was faithful (maybe imperfect) to my calling. Regardless of the verdict, I will have no regrets.
God does not always promise an easy path or a guaranteed victory in every battle we go through. But He is faithful and He is there if you seek Him and put your trust in Him. We will see how Justice Anne Molloy rules and what her reasoning is in terms of my finding of guilt or innocence on September 16, 2016.
“For God will bring every deed into judgment, with every secret thing, whether good or evil.” Ecclesiastes 12:4
I am now on my way back to Alberta. It was an interesting 3 month stay in the heart of downtown Toronto. My “hate crime” trial and my run to become Toronto Centre Rosedale’s Christian actual conservative Member of Parliament was especially interesting. Having potential voters in $2 million dollar homes call 911 on me when they received my election flyer and having woke, twenty something year old, female University of Toronto law students freak out and run for campus security when they received my election promises on their campus was downright interesting. Trying to get help for an unconscious overdose victim on a busy downtown Toronto street and have people walk buy and choose not to get involved (I suspect most who walked by were left wing types) was disturbing but interesting.
My transvestite neighbour running around in his short, short, shorts, with his nuts almost hanging out is sort of interesting, but I might not miss him too much. A drugged up, aggressive, guy twice my size smashing a long out of order payphone by an A & W I was walking by and then threatening out of no where to punch me in the face, and then attacking a city garbage can, and then tossing some of the garbage in it at me was interesting, but I definitely won’t miss that guy.
I also met really good people in Toronto. Preaching at three Drag Queen Story Hours with Brad and Pastor Jeffrey Sapocinik was awesome. My Toronto and Hamilton friends who came to court to support me were awesome and much appreciated. Brother Phil getting a team together to help with my election flyers when I needed to add a label at the last minute was a huge blessing. Visiting Father Tony and my friend Paul and my years of friendship with them are huge blessings. Meeting Renaldo at a busy McDonalds as he loudly rebuked Walmart Customer Service on his phone about their practice of selling vibrators, contraceptives, and abortifacient pills at their downtown Bloor/Dufferin location was awesome. I never met a guy quite like him in rural Alberta.
Still, I am looking forward to going back to my rural, red neck, Alberta trailer park now. I think my trailer park is more my kind of place.
My Lifefunder just about perfectly met my need for the three months I have had to reside in Toronto. I just need $300 or so more for gas to get back to Alberta, and then I will appreciate prayers that I find a job right away. I have befriended a Hutterite fellow close to where I live and a grain truck fellow close to my town. I will find out if either of them still need me to drive for them when I return. Pray that God opens a door so I can sustain myself and stay busy until the judgment is rendered in September, then we will see what happens then. God is in control.
https://www.lifefunder.com/whatcott
In Christ’s Service,
Bill Whatcott
“And I, when I came to you, brothers, did not come proclaiming to you the testimony of God with lofty speech or wisdom. For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified.” 1 Corinthians 2:1, 2