Amazon Removes “Camp of the Saints” but After Protests Relists It

Posted on by

Book was censored by Amazon, until…

DailyKenn.comApr 22

I’d like to read the classic 1973 novel The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail. Despite my French surname, I speak no French other than oui and garbage, so I can’t read the original. At the same time, I’m not eager to spend one hundred dollars on an English translation.

But does it really matter? The book’s central premise — France being overwhelmed by waves of “migrant” invaders — has unfolded in real time across the West. These days, I can simply open Fox News to watch it happening.

This topic first caught my attention when a recent YouTube video by Mark Dice appeared in my recommendations. He was covering Amazon’s censorship of conservative books. Shortly afterward, I saw that Matt Walsh of The Daily Wire had also released a video on the same subject. Much as I enjoy Matt’s signature gruff delivery, I chose Mark’s version — it was shorter.

I learned that Amazon, which controls more than half of all book sales in the United States, temporarily removed the provocative novel from its platform last week before restoring it following widespread customer outrage.

The Sudden Disappearance of The Camp of the Saints

The book in question depicts a fictional scenario in which a massive flotilla carrying roughly a million migrants from India and other parts of the Global South arrives on the shores of France, overwhelming the country’s institutions and cultural identity. Long labeled racist and inflammatory by woke critics suffering from moonbatopathy, the novel has been largely unavailable in affordable English editions for years. A small publisher, Valbin Books, recently produced a new, accessible translation and invested significant resources to bring it back into print.

After conservative commentators drew attention to the title, it quickly rose on Amazon’s bestseller charts and earned overwhelmingly positive customer reviews.

Then poof! It was scrubbed from the sacred pages of Amazon.

There was no warning or detailed explanation. The entire listing for the new edition just vanished. Shoppers saw only an error message. Older, out-of-print hardcover copies remained available—but often at prices exceeding $100. Gasp. The affordable version that had been gaining traction was effectively erased from the site.

The publisher reported that Amazon cited a violation of its “offensive content” policy. When pressed, Amazon later described the removal as a technical error. Many observers found the explanation unconvincing, especially given the timing: the delisting followed critical articles in French and American media that portrayed the book as influential among nationalist conservatives, otherwise called paleo-conservatives.

Double Standards in Content Policies

Critics pointed out that Amazon continues to sell Das Kapital, the holy scripture of Marxism, and numerous books promoting transgender ideology for children, including titles offering guidance on supporting a child’s gender transition. Supporters of the ban argued the novel crosses a line by presenting mass migration in unflattering terms. I fail to see the offense. The publisher, on the other hand — the right hand, countered that the story includes nuanced non-white characters and is primarily a warning about elite attitudes that could lead to demographic and cultural transformation, rather than a blanket condemnation of any ethnic group.

But wait. There’s more!

This segues (the only Spanish word I know besides si and adiós) to a broader pattern of past removals. Several years ago, Amazon pulled titles such as Ryan T. Anderson’s “When Harry Became Sally,” a critique of the transgender movement, which later returned after criticism from public figures including lawmakers. Other works by authors like Kevin MacDonald, David Duke, Jared Taylor, and Greg Johnson, along with historical texts such as Henry Ford’s “The International Jew” and Martin Luther’s writings on religious topics, were also removed around 2019–2020 and have not been restored on the main platform.

Retailers, including Barnes & Noble, have similarly restricted some of these titles. In contrast, books on unrelated sensitive subjects, including certain historical manuals, remain available through Amazon.

(My book, The Prayer of Hannah, is still available from third parties. It sold about 25,000 copies before the inventory was stolen from a warehouse.)

Alternative sources for some removed titles include direct publisher sites, used booksellers, or independent retailers like ThriftBooks and Books-A-Million, though availability varies and prices for out-of-print editions can be extravagant.

Sometimes I get things wrong. If you notice a significant error, please bring it to my attention in the comment section.

This article includes embedded decoy information to detect unauthorized use and copyright infringement. Reproduction is permitted only verbatim and in full, with all links preserved and attribution clearly given to DailyKenn.com and AbateHate.com.

Amazon Bans ‘The Camp of the Saints’—Then Relists It After Backlash

The Return of a Once-Banned Dystopian Novel Sparks Fresh Debate

Amazon pulls infamous immigration novel from website, sparking censorship firestorm

Amazon Removes The Camp of the Saints Citing “Offensive Content”

Amazon Didn’t Ban The Camp Of The Saints Because It’s ‘Offensive’ But Because It Resonates

Amazon U.S. Bans Raspail’s Bestseller The Camp of the Saints

When Harry Became Sally Removed From Amazon

Australia’s “Antisemitism Envoy” Makes It Clear That Israel’s Critics Are The Real Target

Posted on by
Australia’s “Antisemitism Envoy” Makes It Clear That Israel’s Critics Are The Real TargetCAITLIN JOHNSTONEAPR 26 READ IN APP Reading by Tim Foley:Upgrade to paidAustralia’s “antisemitism envoy” Jillian Segal has published a handbookwhich unequivocally clarifies that her office exists not to protect Australian Jews from discrimination, but to stomp out criticism of the state of Israel.However bad you’re imagining it is, it’s worse. The handbook, set to be formally launched later this week under the title “Understanding Antisemitism in Australia,” explicitly conflates antisemitism and antizionism with statements like “Antisemitism and antizionism are both expressions of hatred towards Jews” and asserting that it is antisemitic to accuse Israel of “apartheid, oppression, racism and genocide.”It is therefore unambiguously the official position of the Australian government’s appointed authority on antisemitism that it is hateful and abusive toward Jews and their religion to oppose the racist political ideology underpinning the modern state of Israel.

So when Australians hear Jillian Segal and government officials talking about how there’s been an increase in “antisemitism” in our country and saying extreme measures must be taken to stop it, it’s important to be clear that this is the “antisemitism” they are talking about. They are talking about criticism of Israel.Alternate Media Watchers@AltMediaWatchAccording to the Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism, Jillian Segal’s new handbook “Understanding Antisemitism in Australia” anti-Zionism is “an expression of hatred towards Jews”. What a disgusting use of taxpayer money to weaponise antisemitism in defense of Israel.2:04 AM · Apr 25, 2026 · 33.6K Views43 Replies · 259 Reposts · 667 Likes

Let’s go through the handbook together and highlight some revealing excerpts, shall we?The forward in the handbook stresses the importance of the Australian government’s endorsement of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, which has been opposed around the world for its conflation of criticism of Israel with hateful actions toward Jews. Under the IHRA definition it is considered antisemitic to claim that Israel is a racist endeavor, or to compare Israel’s abuses to those of Nazi Germany — both of which are entirely legitimate criticisms which should be put forward far more often than they are. Much of the handbook follows from the premises of the IHRA definition.Segal’s office states that the handbook “is intended as a practical resource for schools, universities, public servants, community organisations and anyone seeking to understand antisemitism today.”

Segal’s office says that antisemitism “morphs” over the ages, from the blood libels and “Christ-killer” accusations of the Middle Ages to the racism of Nazi Germany, and has now morphed so that “antisemitic tropes are conveyed and justified in the language of human rights and international legal arguments.”“For example, sometimes Jews are labelled and libelled as ‘settler-colonialists’, ‘oppressors’, and a symbol of a global system of domination that ‘can seemingly accommodate even the murder of Jews as Jews’,” the envoy proclaims.Do you see how the subject was moved to lump medieval superstitions about Jews in with entirely legitimate criticisms of the modern state of Israel? According to Australia’s Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism, criticising Israel using “language of human rights and international legal arguments” is not meaningfully different from saying that Jews drink the blood of Christian children.This, clearly, is stark raving insanity.

“Legitimate criticism of Israel is not antisemitic,” the envoy concedes, then proceeds to completely negate this concession with everything that follows. “However, there are many examples of antisemitic imagery, tropes, conspiracy theories and propaganda (echoing medieval myths) that have found their way into anti-Israel discourse. It is also increasingly common for the word ‘Zionist’ (or iterations of it) to be used as cover or proxy for ‘Jew ’.”This is completely made up. The claim that critics of Israel’s abuses use the word “Zionist” when they really mean “Jew” is just something Israel apologists started asserting with no substantiation whatsoever a few years ago. They have no evidence for this assertion apart from the frequency and forcefulness which with they assert it.The envoy defines Zionism as “the belief that the Jewish people have the right to self-determination within their ancestral homeland,” which is misleading at best. That’s not what Zionism is. Zionism is what we see before us today. The genocide, apartheid, ethnic cleansing and nonstop war and abuse. That’s what Zionism is, as evidenced by material reality. The best definition of Zionism is its real-world manifestations. Zionism is what it looks like when you give the Zionists everything they want.

“A new variant of antisemitic atrocity denial emerged in the wake of the 7 October 2023 Hamas terrorist attacks — the deadliest day for Jewish people since the Holocaust,” the envoy writes. “Disturbingly, these atrocities have been met by some with denial, minimisation, justification and distortion — echoing Holocaust denial, minimisation, and distortion.”Segal’s office is here telling us that it is antisemitic to talk about the glaring plot holes in the narratives about mass rapes, beheaded babies and babies cooked in ovens on October 7, or to talk about the large number of Israelis who were killed by IDF fire under the Hannibal Directive, or to “justify” the attack by pointing out the monstrous Israeli abuses which gave rise to it.The envoy writes of the importance of “Standing firm against antisemitism parading as ‘anti-racism’,” stressing the IHRA position that framing Israel as a racist endeavor is hateful toward Jews. A flyer saying “We don’t want your two states. We want all of 48” is labeled “antisemitic, because there is only one Jewish country.”Segal’s office warns of the dangers of “Holocaust inversion,” which is when “Israel and Jews are portrayed as Nazi-like perpetrators of mass atrocities and genocide,” which is bad because it “serves to demonise and delegitimise Israel, Israelis and Jews.”To be clear, every relevant humanitarian institution on earth has said that Israel is guilty of genocide in Gaza. These groups include:1. The United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory2. The International Association of Genocide Scholars3. B’Tselem (an Israeli organization)4. Physicians for Human Rights-Israel (another Israeli organization)5. Amnesty International6. Doctors Without Borders7. The European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights8. Human Rights Watch9. The International Federation for Human Rights10. The Lemkin Institute for Genocide PreventionThe list of humanitarian institutions who say Israel is NOT committing genocide in Gaza includes:1. Nobody2. No one3. Zero4. Nothing5. Nada6. Zilch7. Sweet damn all8. A complete absence9. Diddly squat10. BupkisThis is not some fringe conspiracy theory. It is a thoroughly established and entirely indisputable fact. Australia’s Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism is saying that facts are antisemitic.Some examples cited in the handbook of glaring instances of the antisemitic crime of “Holocaust inversion”: — Placards of ‘ Well done Hitler would be proud’ and ‘Same shit Different asshole’, the latter with images of Hitler and Netanyahu, both placards making Nazi analogies to Israel. — Three banners of Hitler removing his mask , revealing the face of Netanyahu, making an analogy between Nazism and Israel, on major roads. — Graffiti of a Star of David, equal sign, and Nazi swastika , and another graffiti of ‘End the Genocide’ on a main road.We’re meant to believe it should be a hate crime to say the state that’s waging multiple wars of aggression while mass murdering people because of their ethnicity bears some resemblance to another state which did these things. I don’t know about you, but I find that silly.Australia’s “antisemitism envoy” claims it is antisemitic to say the IHRA definition of antisemitism silences criticism of Israel, arguing that “claims that the leading global definition of antisemitism — which reflects the lived experience of Jewish people worldwide — is designed to intentionally silence criticism echoes antisemitic tropes of Jewish power and control.”That’s right kids: you can’t criticise Israel because that’s antisemitic, and if you complain that your speech is being suppressed, that’s antisemitic too.The handbook includes a hypothetical office group chat with a coworker making the statement “But what about the genocidal, racist Zionist project that has oppressed the Palestinians? Zionism is a supremacist ideology invented by Theodore Herzl. They’ve done this through apartheid and ethnic cleansing.”“This is antisemitic,” the handbook argues, dismissing the entirely accurate statement as “Soviet-era antizionist propaganda” and saying it “was antisemitic because it included statements that accused Israel of apartheid, oppression, racism and genocide.”Saying it’s antisemitic to accuse Israel of apartheid, oppression, racism and genocide is as clear an admission that Segal’s goal is to stomp out all criticism of Israel as you could possibly ask for.If that wasn’t clear enough for you, the handbook concludes with the assertion that it is impossible to separate antizionism from antisemitism:“Trying to separate ‘antisemitism’ from ‘antizionism’ ignores the history of misinformation, disinformation and antisemitic propaganda that has shaped narratives about Israel and Zionism,” the envoy asserts. “It also ignores the lived and practical reality that wherever these antizionist narratives have been propagated, it has resulted in discrimination, harassment , vilification, hate and harm towards Jews. For example, Poland’s 1968 antizionist campaign resulted in expulsions and forced emigration of thousands of Jewish Poles.”“Antisemitism and antizionism are both expressions of hatred towards Jews,” the handbook concludes.So there you have it. That settles that.Caitlin Johnstone@caitozJillian Segal is a white South African who lobbies for an apartheid state and whose husband pays money to foment racism in Australia — and yet she was somehow chosen by the Labor government to help stomp out hate in this country.11:28 PM · Jul 13, 2025 · 29.6K Views57 Replies · 691 Reposts · 2.11K LikesThroughout the handbook, the feelings of Australian Jews are cited over and over again as supremely important and of far more urgent a concern than genocide, apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and wars of immense geopolitical consequence.“Feel more isolated… I feel like I am living the life of a Jew from history, rather than the Jew I was 2 years ago,” reads a quote from an unnamed Jewish person.“I just feel so sad that I need to educate my children in how to respond if they are screamed at in the street,” reads another.“The silence from friends I have known almost all my life, the constant posting of antisemitic slurs and the public broadcasts of factually incorrect reports has been devastating and makes me fearful of what might happen next. Since October 7, when I speak to someone who hasn’t offered any support, I often ask myself ‘would they hide me’ which is a terribly sad situation in our beautiful country where I have always felt safe,” reads another.“A tutor in my university class made antisemitic comments very casually which made me feel extremely uncomfortable and unsafe. I am now nervous when entering a uni class,” reads another.“Being confronted again and again with blind hate towards my people and the place I come from was very painful. It impacted my mood, the way I perceived my community and my place in it, and my daily function,” reads another.Virtually nothing is said about the real victims. The murdered, displaced and terrorized targets of Israeli atrocities in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Iran. The war orphans. The child amputees and burn victims who were operated on without anesthesia. The Palestinians being raped and tortured in Israeli prisons. The people who will carry the physical and psychological wounds from their holocaust with them for the rest of their lives.They are not regarded as important by Jillian Segal. The real crisis, in her mind, is people talking about these things and making Jewish Australians feel upset.Absolutely psychotic. We cannot allow our country to continue to be dragged in this direction._________________

Professor Frances Widdowson Arrested At University of Lethbridge Having Coffee With A Student.. Her views questioning Mass Graves Hoax at Residential School Not Welcome

Posted on by

COMMUNIST CANADA:

Public institution ( U of Lethbridge )…taxpayer funded…. has her arrested…just for being there …no crimes committed.   Trespass charge…..UNreal

BREAKING: Canadian Professor Arrested After Questioning Residential School Mass Grave Claims

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzQgLXqpRvtCGHrMgMmfPwRXHlSK?projector=1

Happy Birthday Ernst Zündel – April 24th 2026: Revisionist Free Speech Martyr

Posted on by

Happy Birthday Ernst Zündel – April 24th 2026

We want to show a sneering world of enemies, envious people, and haters, clearly and unequivocally, that although they can militarily defeat us Germans, occupy us with foreign troops, infiltrate us with spies, rule us with traitors, lie to us by a foreign-controlled licensed press, and even shame us; that they can persecute and enslave us through a perverted political justice system and a police force prone to arbitrary acts, these criminals against Germany’s destiny will never defeat us. ~Ernst Zündel

Happy Birthday Ernst Zündel

“Alternative media” a “top concern”: Public Safety Deputy Minister

Posted on by

“Alternative media” a “top concern”: Public Safety Deputy Minister

“Alternative media” a “top concern”: Public Safety Deputy Minister

Public Safety Canada Deputy Minister Tricia Geddes also lauded the government’s use of the Emergencies Act against “extremists.”

Quinn Patrick

Apr 23, 2026

∙ Paid

Geddes speaking at the ISS conference in Sweden: X

Public Safety Canada Deputy Minister Tricia Geddes recently told an international audience that alternative media was a top concern for the Liberal government and lauded the use of the Emergencies Act to quash peaceful Freedom Convoy protesters.

Geddes was in Stockholm, Sweden, to give a speech at the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ conference called Threats and Responses.

You won’t find stories like this in legacy media. Become a Juno News premium subscriber today to support bold, fearless independent journalism.

During the panel discussion, she also lauded the utility of the Emergencies Act, and how it has helped her government deal with “extremists”, but that there is “low trust in Canada in many of our government institutions and that’s something we need to build foundationally.”

“At the federal level, Canada’s priorities include concern with our relative vulnerability to information manipulation and polarizing narratives, and the growing skepticism of younger Canadians towards democracy, who shape their world online through alternative media,” she said on Tuesday.

“Foreign adversaries are seeking to leverage this vulnerability to their advantage. Protecting democratic institutions and the public by strengthening intelligence collection and information sharing across all levels of government.”

Liberal budget quietly pushes for new digital ID system

Read full story

When asked what legal framework Ottawa was equipped with on the issue, Geddes said that the Carney government was “really struggling with the speed of moving legislative reform,” adding that they’ve been trying for eight years, and through multiple Parliaments, to get new online regulations passed.

“We’ve suffered through prorogations and changes in governments and haven’t been able to get across the finish line. So that’s a bit frustrating and challenging for us,” she said. “The technology and privacy debate is what is sort of the most acutely difficult legislative conversation in Canada.”

However, it was under former prime minister Justin Trudeau that Parliament was prorogued, which lasted for several months.

Trudeau government lawyers argue over limits to prorogation

February 15, 2025

Geddes then went on to note how the Liberals have found “a lot of old legislation is proving to be extremely useful right now,” citing her government’s invocation of the Emergencies Act as a highly effective tool.

According to the deputy minister, while the Emergencies Act was created “many decades ago for different circumstances,” it has still proved to “give us the types of authorities that we need in extremists. So that’s helpful.”

The Emergencies Act was invoked for the first time during the 2022 Convoy protest against government mandates regarding the COVID-19 pandemic to quash peaceful protestors from demonstrating in Ottawa.

What Geddes failed to mention is that at the beginning of the year, the Federal Court of Appeals upheld a January 2024 Federal Court decision that the federal government’s invocation of the Emergencies Act was “unreasonable.”

Justice Richard Mosley’s earlier ruling had declared the Act’s economic and emergency measures violated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

·

Jan 16

Read full story

On March 27, the final day of the Supreme Court’s deadline for appeal, the federal government then filed an appeal challenging the federal court’s landmark ruling, reopening litigation on its use of the Emergencies Act.

Geddes added that it has been “very difficult to get Canadians to understand the imminence of the terrorism threat in Canada,” which has made it difficult for the government to make any reforms, but now the population wants to meet the moment.

“We try to take advantage of the way Canadians have decided that there is a need to stand up for themselves at this moment and that is an area where we can tap into,” she said.

Peter Brimelow: 25 Years Of The SPLC And Me

Posted on by
My long-time VDARE colleague James Fulford here explains why wire fraud charges against the Southern Poverty Law Center are such a threat–because they trigger draconian Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) War On Drugs/ War On Terror laws. Like Al Capone being nailed for tax evasion. Con Inc. media fixating on (false) assertion that SPLC astroturfed the Right: they were actually trying to pay informants untraceably.

25 Years Of The SPLC And Me

James FulfordApr 23
 
READ IN APP
 

Earlier on the Fulford File: The SPLC Was NEVER A “Civil Rights Stalwart”—It Was ALWAYS A “Dangerous Joke”

Please Sign Up As A PAID Subscriber: Remember, I’m only on Substack because VDARE was forced to suspend operations by NYAG Letitia James’s lawfare, so if you’re a free subscriber, please upgrade to paid!

Yesterday, the AP reported what no one was expecting from the Trump Administration: Southern Poverty Law Center Charged With Defrauding Donors With Payments To Extremist Informants, AP, April 21, 2026.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Southern Poverty Law Center was indicted Tuesday on federal fraud charges alleging it improperly raised millions of dollars to secretly pay leaders of the Ku Klux Klan and other hate groups for inside information, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said.

The Justice Department alleges the civil rights group defrauded donors by using their money to fund the very extremism it claimed to be fighting, with more than $3 million paid to informants through a now-defunct program to infiltrate white supremacist and other extremist groups. Prosecutors allege some of the money was used by extremists to carry out other crimes, but court papers did not include specific examples.

Banking expert Patrick McKenzie pointed out on Twitter that Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) laws make it illegal to lie to your bank about what you’re doing with your money, e. g. saying “We’re totally not using this to pay undercover informants” etc.

Patrick McKenzie@patio11A thing I once said about AML/KYC functioning as tripwires with the explicit intention that the process crimes they create would make life easier for prosecutors.12:50 AM · Apr 22, 2026 · 15.8K Views7 Replies · 12 Reposts · 202 Likes

He adds an image of the SPLC’s banking information being used in the the indictment and says

This is extremely common prosecutorial practice; the only surprising part is the defendant. (About which, doubtless your opinion journal of choice will have some column inches fairly soon.)

And here we are!

A search of VDARE.com archives says that I’ve been writing about the Southern Poverty Law Center for twenty-five years—and I’m not the only one.

They, of course, spent a lot of time writing about VDARE.com, and to a certain extent, me personally. It’s arguable that their attacks on VDARE.com inspired Letitia James’s persecution of VDARE.com, causing me to lose my job:

Ann Coulter On Letitia James’s Attack On VDARE—And Appeal For Subscribers
James Fulford·November 11, 2025
Ann Coulter On Letitia James's Attack On VDARE—And Appeal For Subscribers
NOTE: See the subscribe button? Thanks to Letitia James’s attack on VDARE.com, I need paid subscriptions urgently, for such things as “food” and “living indoors.” I’m updating this Substack several times a week, and here’s your chance to become a Patron of the Arts. Thank you to those who have subscribed—especially paid subscribers.
Read full story

Which, to digress for a moment, is why it would be a very good thing for any of you who haven’t to upgrade to a PAID subscription to the Fulford File:

The Fulford File is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid

In 2001, the SPLC was calling VDARE an “Anti-Immigration” group, and trying to say we were guilty by association with writers they’d already condemned, and in 2004, they either upgraded or downgraded us to “Hate Group”, based apparently on a fairly mild speech VDARE editor Peter Brimelow gave to a Chronicles conference.

You have to realize that VDARE was basically a journalistic enterprise, like National Review, Chronicles, Mother Jones, or The New Republic. It’s not about street-fighting, agitation, demonstrations or even, despite our writing on politics, political activism.

It’s about reporting facts, and analysis, which is what I do now, but the SPLC didn’t like the analysis, or for that matter even the facts, which is why they would attack people who read, quoted, or forwarded things we wrote. People attacked for reading us by the SPLC included the Center For Immigration Studies, and Trump advisor Stephen Miller.

In 2017, they attacked something I had written in the article below:

Altered-Right: How White Nationalists Exploit Tragedy to Build a Narrative of White Victimhood, January 25, 2017

The picture above is of mentally-challenged white teenager kidnapped and tortured on Facebook Live, by blacks who yelled “F— Trump!” and “F— white people!”

You have to understand that “F— Trump!” and “F— white people!” is the ideology of, very specifically, the Southern Poverty Law Center…and their Black Lives Matter allies.

Here’s them denying that and attacking me:

The false narrative of an epidemic of so-called “black-on-white crime” has long been one of the most effective deceptions in white nationalist propaganda, playing directly into an idea of besieged white populace while also attacking the press for censoring the “real facts.”….

VDARE, another pseudo-intellectual white nationalist outlet more narrowly focused on immigration policy, was happy to promote the #BLMKidnapping narrative anyway, despite its ideological divorce with Cernovich.

“A young white man was kidnapped by four blacks, inspired by Black Lives Matter propaganda, and anti-white, anti-Trump hate, the hate that comes from black leaders, the mainstream media, the Democratic Party…and the White House,” wrote James Fulford, a columnist at VDARE.

In a bizarre twist, Fulford voluntarily introduced Dylann Roof as an attempt to point out hypocrisy from the left while bemoaning the widespread removal of the Confederate battle flags around the South after photos surfaced of Roof with one in the wake of the shooting. The connection was analogous to him.

It certainly was. This post of theirs contained an actual link to my January 2017 post Black Lives Matter Inspired Kidnap/Torture Of White Man Getting “Man Arrested” Treatment, so possibly their readers could have judged for themselves.

But the point is that Roof committed a mass murder of random innocent blacks allegedly because he’d been told about massive black-on-white crime, which is not a “false narrative” but simple fact.

NYT Discovers “Villain” In Mass Murder Of White Family By Black NFL Player: “CTE”
James Fulford·October 2, 2025
NYT Discovers "Villain" In Mass Murder Of White Family By Black NFL Player: "CTE"
Read full story

The SPLC specifically blamed the people who’d posted these facts online, while calling black-on-white crime a “lie”.

A would never defend Dylann Roof’s shooting innocent black people in a church, but there are many, many, people, including the SPLC, who are very understanding of, and supportive of, black-on-white violence. Here’s what I said in my 2017 post:

Buzzfeed’s headline is

Four People Charged With Hate Crime After Man Tortured In Facebook Live Video

“Fuck Donald Trump, fuck white people,” an attacker says while an 18-year-old man, described as having mental health issues, is beaten.

I call that burying the lede, but here are the pictures Buzzfeed provides:

Buzzfeed is not promoting this as a black crime, but they noticed it was a black crime in order attempt to exonerate the Black Lives Matter movement:

People Are Blaming The Chicago Kidnapping On Black Lives Matter With Zero Evidence

The Chicago police said they could not confirm if the video was tied to any organization. posted by Tasneem Nashrulla [Email her]on Jan. 5, 2017, at 1:16 p.m.

To Hell with your “Zero Evidence”—were the riots and the shooting of police also not inspired by BLM?

No one ever asks for “evidence” in the rare white hate crimes. Dylann Roof was part of no “movement”, but they tore down Confederate flags all over the South because of his crime.

Next time a “Black Lives Matter” spokesman makes a public appearance, the MSM should ask him to condemn this—but they won’t.

It would be nice to think that the criminal prosecution will inspire people to refuse to associate with the SPLC, but that’s a long way to go.

In any event, the fact that the FBI director Kash Patel was recently smeared as a drunkard by the Atlantic inspired me to Tweet this:

James Fulford@JMF1958This is about the SPLC, in effect, laundering bribe money— and being caught at it by Kash Patel. (Image not unrelated.)Patrick McKenzie@patio11A thing I once said about AML/KYC functioning as tripwires with the explicit intention that the process crimes they create would make life easier for prosecutors.1:29 AM · Apr 22, 2026 · 63 Views1 Reply

James Fulford has been writing about the national question for over 20 years, mostly for VDARE.com, more recently for WhitePapers.

SPLC Scandal: The Accuser Becomes the Accused

Posted on by
Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for moreWatch nowSPLC Scandal: The Accuser Becomes the AccusedAct for AmericaApr 23 READ IN APP At a formal announcement involving the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice, the Southern Poverty Law Center was hit with sweeping federal fraud charges that cut to the core of its operations. According to officials, this was not a minor accounting issue or technical violation. It was a decade-long, multi-million dollar scheme built on deception.

For years, the SPLC cultivated a powerful image: a watchdog organization raising funds to dismantle violent extremist groups. Donors across the country were told their contributions would be used to combat hate and protect communities. But according to federal investigators, that image was not just misleading—it was a lie.Authorities allege that the SPLC used its vast donor network to raise millions of dollars under the pretense of fighting extremism, only to redirect those funds in a shocking and deeply disturbing way: paying the very leadership of the extremist groups it claimed to oppose.

Let that sink in. Money raised to “fight hate” was allegedly funneled directly into the hands of those leading organizations such as the Ku Klux Klan, the United Klans of America, and networks tied to the Charlottesville Unite the Right rally—along with other groups including the National Alliance, National Socialist Movement, Aryan Nation Motorcycle Club, and the National Socialist Party of America.This was not infiltration. This was not passive observation. According to the indictment, this was financial support—support that, in at least one instance, allegedly helped facilitate additional criminal activity totaling more than $3 million.

And it didn’t stop there.Investigators say the SPLC went to great lengths to conceal its actions. Shell companies and fictitious entities were allegedly created to disguise the origin of funds, deceiving financial institutions and masking the organization’s role in the transactions. The scheme, built over the course of a decade, relied on exploiting trust—trust from donors, trust from the public, and trust from the very systems designed to ensure accountability.But as investigators made clear: money leaves a trail. And eventually, that trail led right back to the source.For years, the SPLC operated as a self-appointed authority on “hate,” branding organizations like ACT for America with labels that carried devastating consequences. Those designations were used to justify censorship, deplatforming, and financial blacklisting. Americans were silenced. Reputations were destroyed. Entire movements were marginalized—not by elected officials or due process, but by the word of a single organization that is now facing serious federal charges.

The implications are staggering.If these allegations hold, it means the SPLC didn’t just misrepresent reality—it helped sustain the very forces it claimed to fight. It means that while publicly condemning extremism, it may have been quietly enabling it. And it means that the narratives pushed into the mainstream for years deserve to be reexamined with a far more critical eye.Stand with us as a Patriot Partner in our $26 for 2026 campaign to preserve America and keep our nation out of radical hands. We are looking for 500 dedicated Patriot Partners to help fuel our efforts as we battle to defend our Constitution, our values, and our children’s future.This is a reckoning that has been a long time coming.For policymakers, media outlets, and corporations that have relied on SPLC reports as a gold standard, the message is simple: that standard has collapsed. Blindly accepting one organization’s labels as truth is no longer just irresponsible—it is indefensible.The loudest accusers are not always the most virtuous. In many cases, they are the most determined to deflect attention from their own actions.What is unfolding now is not just a legal case. It is a moment of exposure. A moment when the carefully constructed image begins to crack—and the truth begins to emerge.What is done in darkness will eventually come to light.And now, that light is impossible to ignore.

UPDATE ON ADAM SKELLY’S COVID CASE: Adam Skelly – Justice Denied in Court! BY DEREK SLOAN

Posted on by

Adam Skelly – Justice Denied in Court!

Last time we spoke, Adam Skelly’s legal showdown was about to begin. After 6 years of twists, turns, and multiple near-death experiences, Adam’s case finally got its day in court in February. His lawyer presented all the elaborate evidence with 6 high-level experts, while the government had 1 expert. In a shocking outcome, the application was denied, without Adam’s evidence being so much as mentioned.

Adam’s team released a statement which stated in part: “[we] are disappointed, disheartened and frankly, disturbed at the outcome of the [hearing]…the application judge said near the end of the hearing she would judge this matter on its merits. Unfortunately, she did not.” Adam’s team says the judge “disappeared 500 pages of unrefuted, expert evidence.”

On Thursday of this week, I will have a brand new interview with Adam to share all the details.

As you know, this has been one of the craziest legal sagas of the decade, with multiple ups-and-downs, and multiple “near-death” experiences, including a critical public health expert dropping out, and the government requiring over $30,000 in costs to keep the case going. All of these challenges have been met and overcome by Adam and his team.

Adam Skelly was the one of the first people to stand against the government’s draconian lockdowns in 2020. Before Heroic Pastors, before the Freedom Convoy, Adam Skelly exploded onto the scene by opening up his restaurant, Adamson BBQ, defying the lockdowns, and became the first business owner in the history of Canada (even North America) to be arrested for disobeying a public health order (truly shocking).

Adam is the only person left with standing in court to challenge the government’s emergency lockdowns during COVID. Therefore it is critical that this case goes forward. No one else can bring a case to challenge the governments action during covid as the 2 year limitations period has passed, and there are no other cases in the court system already.

Adam’s team has already filed their appeal. The judge did not even mention any of their 500 pages of evidence. The government didn’t even try to refute it or discredit Adam’s experts. They just simply ignored it. Adam’s team believes this is a critical and appealable mistake by the judge who was supposed to give a fair hearing where all of the evidence would be weighed.

This case is going forward to the Ontario Court of Appeal – and Adam needs your help to see it through. Would you please support Adam today?

https://www.fundingthefight.ca/donate_adam

Adam’s team, in their statement, go on to say that the principles of fundamental justice are rooted in the pursuit of truth, fairness and unbiased proceedings. They believe that the “truth-seeking function of the court was plainly and obviously unfulfilled.”

As for the evidence, Adam’s team says the preponderance of evidence has been in their favour since it was initially sworn in 2021. However, even though the judge mentioned the province’s lone expert (Dr. Hodge) 16 separate times, and Dr. Devilla (former Toronto officer of health) or the Ministry of Health over 100 times, she mentioned Adam’s 6 experts a total of zero times.

This failure to grapple with their evidence is a fatal flaw of this ruling. Adam’s case had six high-level PhD or MD experts including Dr. Harvey Risch from Yale, and Dr. Byram Bridle. That not one of them was mentioned is really unbelievable.

Adam’s case is significant because his legal defense is going to the heart of the COVID narrative relied on by the government. Some other cases have failed because the basic tenets of the pandemic have been conceded, and the argument became about whether the government’s response was reasonable. Unfortunately, without arguing over the basic definitions of what happened during COVID-19, it’s very challenging to win a case.

Adam has has been through many ups and downs including having to shut down his three restaurants. He’s now living in Alberta, homesteading and making a living through a small farming operation. This is very challenging work, as you can imagine. Nonetheless, he has not given up on this case, and the events that took so much from him.

My new interview with Adam will be out later this week.

Adam’s story begins early in 2020, during the first lockdowns, when Adam made the courageous decision to open up his famous BBQ restaurant in Etobicoke, notwithstanding lockdown orders. The police changed his locks, but he broke into his own restaurant, defying the prohibition. As Adam relates the story, over 250 police were called to deal with the situation, even horse mounted cavalry, and he was hauled off to jail, but not before making news all across the country.

In our last interview, Adam told us the full extent of the assault by government. For example, Adam has received both provincial and criminal charges for trying to keep his restaurant open, and the outcome of this hearing will impact all of them.

He says the Toronto Board of Health has come after him in a civil claim, trying to get their $187,000 back that they spent to hire the police to shut down Adam’s restaurant! As Adam says: “Remember the videos from that protest? They had the street for like half a km in each direction full of police cars, there must have been 80 police cruisers, both lanes totally blocked…Costco just up the street was packed full of people [shopping normally]…they hired Toronto police…paid them overtime…the mounted unit, [my] whole building covered with police shoulder to shoulder. They spent $187,000 enforcing the closure order, and now they’re trying to recover that money from me, we countersued, and brought Eileen Devilla into it, saying she acted outside of her authority as the medical officer of health.” It’s not enough they destroyed his business, they want him to pay for the police used to do it.

As for this hearing, as I’ve mentioned before, they tried various tricks to shut down Adam’s case before it even had it’s day in court. For example, they required Adam to come up with 30k to even have the case heard, as “security” for costs. But with your help, we helped him meet that challenge, and Adam was able to schedule his hearing for last October! They then required his expert evidence to be resworn, which caused the issue with the one expert who didn’t want to recommit.

Adam stood out on a limb and became a major focal point for freedom in Canada. Adam’s case is the last chance we have to challenge the government’s actions during COVID-19. Adam must appeal this case, for all of us. He is the only one left with standing to challenge the government’s actions during COVID. Will you help today?

Please help Adam raise $60,000 to complete this case.

https://www.fundingthefight.ca/donate_adam

Adam’s appeal being shut down is disheartening, but in a case of this magnitude, it would have been appealed by the government in any event if Adam had won. In all likelihood, this kind of case must go to the Supreme Court of Canada.

On the bright side, Adam recently received an offer to settle his criminal charges he received for breaking the locks on his own property. He will get away with a small charitable donation, some community service, and most importantly no criminal record. With his loss in this constitutional case, they could have hammered him harder, but they chose not to. That’s good news.

Even though Adam has had to give up his life and restaurants in Ontario, he has a thriving farm, family, and faith life in Alberta.

This appeal must go forward. I’m so proud of the courage and tenacity of Adam and his team.

Even though he lost his restaurants and his life in Ontario, he’s not backing down.

Adam Skelly’s case was one of the first prominent COVID-19 cases filed, please support him to continue it.

Stay tuned for more details!

Thanks so much for your support!

God bless!

Anti-Hate Psyop: The SPLC Indictment and Its Chilling Parallels to Canada’s Anti-Hate Network

Posted on by

Anti-Hate Psyop: The SPLC Indictment and Its Chilling Parallels to Canada’s Anti-Hate Network

This is no longer just about monitoring extremism. It is about whether anti-hate organizations have crossed into actively manufacturing it.

In a bombshell development south of the border, the U.S. Department of Justice has indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) on 11 federal counts—including wire fraud, bank fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering—accusing the storied “civil rights” nonprofit of secretly funneling more than $3 million in donor funds to leaders and members of the very extremist groups it claims to oppose. The indictment, returned by a grand jury in Montgomery, Alabama, on April 21, 2026, paints a picture of systematic deception: the SPLC allegedly manufactured the “hate” it fundraised against, while concealing payments through fictitious entities and prepaid gift cards.

This isn’t abstract legal wrangling. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stated bluntly: “The SPLC was not dismantling these groups. It was instead manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred.” FBI Director Kash Patel echoed that the group “lied to their donors… and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups—even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes.”

For Canadians following the Canadian Anti-Hate Network (CAHN)—an organization that openly models itself after the SPLC—the indictment raises urgent questions. CAHN received startup funding from the SPLC, shares intelligence with it, and employs similar monitoring tactics. Its board includes figures like Richard Warman and Kurt Phillips, both accused of infiltrating or posing within neo-Nazi online spaces. CAHN has heavily influenced Canadian policy, from the Online Harms Act to calls for a “pro-democracy movement” funded to counter protests. Critics ask: Is this the same playbook—posing, inflating threats, and driving censorship—now playing out north of the border?

The SPLC’s Alleged Scheme: Funding Hate to Fight Hate

According to the DOJ, the fraud ran from at least 2014 to 2023. The SPLC allegedly paid at least eight individuals tied to violent extremist networks, including the Ku Klux Klan, United Klans of America, National Socialist Movement (American Nazi Party), Aryan Nations-affiliated Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club, and organizers linked to the 2017 Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally.

Methods of concealment and “driving hate”:

  • The SPLC created bank accounts under at least five fictitious entities with no real business purpose.
  • Funds were wired through these shells, then loaded onto prepaid gift cards and physically delivered to sources—hiding the SPLC’s involvement from donors and banks.
  • One informant, paid over $270,000 across eight years, was a member of the online leadership chat that planned Unite the Right. The indictment alleges he made racist postings “under the supervision of the SPLC,” helped coordinate transportation to the deadly rally, and even sent funds onward to other extremist leaders.

The core fraud, per prosecutors: Donors were told their money would “dismantle white supremacy.” Instead, it allegedly subsidized the very people the SPLC publicly denounced—creating a self-sustaining cycle of manufactured extremism to justify endless fundraising and relevance. The SPLC denies the allegations, calling them “politically motivated” and claiming payments were legitimate confidential-informant work shared with law enforcement. The program has since been halted.

CAHN’s Direct Ties to the SPLC

CAHN, founded in 2018, has never hidden its admiration for the SPLC. Its own statements and parliamentary briefs describe the organization as “modelled after and supported by” the SPLC. It received a $25,000 startup grant from the SPLC (with “no strings attached,” per CAHN) and lists the U.S. group as a past funder. CAHN exchanges information on threats and hate groups with the SPLC on an ad-hoc basis and positions itself as Canada’s version of the SPLC’s “Hate Map.”

Board members include Bernie Farber (Chair Emeritus), Evan Balgord (Executive Director), and others who have defended the SPLC model. CAHN has received Canadian government grants (via Canadian Heritage and Public Safety Canada) while mirroring the SPLC’s approach: monitoring, profiling, and advising policymakers.

Posing as Neo-Nazis: The Warman and Phillips Playbook

The parallels to the SPLC’s alleged informant tactics are striking—and documented in Canadian records.

Richard Warman, CAHN board member and longtime legal activist, admitted under oath to creating pseudonyms (“Axetogrind” and “Pogue Mahone”) on neo-Nazi forums like Stormfront.org and Vanguard News Network between 2004 and 2005. He posted messages echoing the group’s rhetoric, including “Keep up the good work Commander Schoep!” (referring to a U.S. neo-Nazi leader) and using coded white-supremacist language like “88.” Warman said this was undercover intelligence-gathering for Section 13 hate-speech complaints under the Canadian Human Rights Act. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (in Warman v. Ouwendyk, 2009) called his actions “disappointing and disturbing,” ruling they “diminish[ed] his credibility” and could have “precipitated further hate messages from forum members.”

Kurt Phillips (also known as Curt Phillips in some references), another CAHN board member and former operator of the Anti-Racist Canada blog, has faced similar accusations. Critic Elisa Hategan has publicly referenced text correspondence with Phillips, alleging he engaged in comparable posing or infiltration tactics within far-right circles to gather (and potentially amplify) material for exposure. While Phillips’ public role has centred on archiving and doxxing, critics argue his methods blurred into provocation—much like Warman’s admitted posts.

CAHN itself has described using “infiltration-style methods” to expose far-right activity, echoing the SPLC’s now-indicted informant program.

Barbara Perry’s Shielded “300 Hate Groups” and CAHN’s Censorship Recommendations

CAHN and aligned researchers like Ontario Tech University’s Dr. Barbara Perry have cited figures of nearly 300 far-right or hate groups in Canada (up from ~100 in a 2015 study). These numbers, drawn from Perry’s work, have been central to CAHN’s development of policy recommendations and underpin calls for expanded monitoring and legislation. Yet Perry’s methodology has drawn sharp criticism as activist-driven: it reportedly includes loose affiliations, online forums, and even mainstream conservative expressions. A 2024 ruling by Ontario’s privacy commissioner blocked public release of Perry’s full list, shielding the data from scrutiny despite its influence on policy and public funding.

https://platform.twitter.

Critics, including in National Post commentary, have asked, If there are truly 300 active neo-Nazi groups, why can’t independent researchers name and verify them? The opacity raises the same “manufactured threat” questions now facing the SPLC.

Evan Balgord has appeared on multiple podcasts and in policy forums, urging government action on online “hate,” frequently citing these statistics as justification. He has recommended mechanisms akin to a digital commission or oversight body—ideas that materialized in the federal Online Harms Act. CAHN’s submissions to Parliament and toolkits have shaped recommendations on content moderation, school reporting, and countering “far-right” influence. Most of CAHN’s internet-censorship proposals have either been proposed or implemented by Ottawa.

CAHN has also sought government funding for what Balgord described as a “pro-democracy movement” to counter right-wing protests and populism. Public records and critics’ analyses show grants flowing to CAHN for workshops, investigations, and social-media engagement—sometimes targeting conservative student groups, the People’s Party of Canada (PPC), or even COVID-protest participants as “anti-democratic.”

Targeting Mainstream Conservatives—and the Big Question

Like the SPLC (which has labelled mainstream conservative organizations as “hate groups”), CAHN has documented ties between conservative campus clubs and fringe elements, or flagged “paleoconservative” rhetoric as sanitized extremism. Its toolkits urge educators to watch for signs like support for certain politicians or traditional values—blurring lines between extremism and legitimate dissent.

This brings us to the most explosive parallel: Could covert funding methods (prepaid cards, shells) be replicated here—not just for monitoring, but for provocation? The SPLC indictment alleges gift-card payments to extremists. CAHN receives public funds and has ties to counter-protest networks (including documented encouragement of Antifa-style “muscular resistance”). Critics openly ask: Are some grants subsidizing online trolls, protest infiltrators, or Antifa actors to inflate hate statistics, justify censorship legislation like the Online Harms Act, and destabilize democratic discourse?

No evidence directly links CAHN to the SPLC’s specific fraud scheme. CAHN insists its work is ethical, independent monitoring to protect vulnerable communities from real threats. Yet the pattern—posing in extremist spaces, inflated/shielded stats, policy capture, and targeting conservatives—mirrors the SPLC’s alleged playbook too closely for comfort.

A Political Psyop? The Question Canadians Must Confront

The SPLC indictment rips the lid off how a nonprofit can allegedly profit from the very division it claims to combat—paying extremists through shells and gift cards to keep the “hate” machine running, all while donors foot the bill for a never-ending crisis. In Canada, CAHN’s SPLC-inspired model operates with the full backing of government grants, shaping everything from the Online Harms Act to taxpayer-funded “pro-democracy” counter-protests. Warman’s admitted forum posts as a faux neo-Nazi, Phillips’ alleged infiltration via text messages, Perry’s activist-driven and now-shielded “300 hate groups” tally, and Balgord’s repeated calls for digital oversight all point to a closed-loop system: provoke or amplify the threat, document the resulting “spike” in hate, then cash in with policy demands and more funding.

This is no longer just about monitoring extremism. It is about whether anti-hate organizations have crossed into actively manufacturing it, using secrecy, infiltration, and opaque statistics to justify censorship laws, deplatforming, and the erosion of free speech. The SPLC precedent makes the Canadian parallels impossible to ignore. Are Canadian taxpayers unknowingly subsidizing the same self-perpetuating cycle of manufactured threats that the DOJ has now exposed south of the border?

The public deserves straight answers. If these tactics are at play here, the cost isn’t just wasted donations—it’s the slow destabilization of democratic debate itself.