Targetted Again: Detained for Three Hours & CBSA Steals My Laptop
MISSISSAUGA, July 17, 2026. Late this afternoon arriving in Toronto on a flight from Tokyo, I was pulled aside for secondary inspection, the only one, I believe, on a plane carrying several hundred passengers. I was informed I was being “detained”, my cellphone, change and keys confiscated temporarily. Led by an officer named Dhaliwal, two Canada Border Service Agency agents searched my luggage, poring over newspaper clippings. They kept two cd discs I’d been given years ago, the memory chip of an old camera I had and my laptop. My laptop is being sent somewhere for “determination.”
This is not the first time I’ve been targetted. About 20 years ago, every time I returned from the U.S., I was pulled aside and my luggage searched. I was advised by a government agent after I’d spoken to the National Alliance in the U.S. that I would be subjected to such a search every time. Sometimes the results were nearly comical.One eagle-eyed border agent in Nighthawk, B.C. seized a copy of Irish Fairy Tales as potential “hate literature.” I eventually got it back. After a few years the persecution eased off. Then, in June this year, I was returning from St. Pierre. I was the only one of some 60 passengers, most of them foreigners, pulled aside for secondary inspection in Halifax. The CBSA employees laboriously pawed their way through my newspaper clippings, most, ironically, from the super-Zionist National Post. One observant officer remarked: “You must like reading.” After about 20 minutes, I was allowed to leave. At the time, I thought the search strange. Was it just my unlucky day or was it the opening round of a new pattern of persecution?
Today’s demeaning ordeal answered the question. CBSA is required to make a determination within 30 days, although in the past they often take much longer. Some years ago, a Canada Customs official, with no sense of irony, answered my question about what happens to literature that is deemed to be “hate”. The answer: “It is burned.”
Why the renewed persecution. Is it because I’m running for Mayor of Hamilton? Hard to tell.
Banks As Agents of Anti-Christian Change — Paul Fromm’s talk at the Social Credit Conference in Rougemont, Quebec, May 21, 2026 https://cright.org/video/2026/
Paul Fromm Discusses the Sad State of Free Speech in Canada with William Finck of Christogenea
https://christogenea.org/event/tonight-paul-fromm-and-free-speech-canadaPaul Fromm has been an advocate for free speech in Canada for many years. There’s a video posted of a David Irving speech at the University of Toronto where he had introduced Irving, and I think that was in 1992. Paul had assisted the defence in the Canadian trial of Ernst Zündel in the late 1980’s, and he was also involved in the Terry Tremaine case in 2006.
Defamatory statements were made about Dr. Otto Schaefer during a recent CBC radio program, for which there was a complete lack of hard data and evidence. I am asking that the CBC make a formal retraction and a public apology for slander.
I happened to tune in to the tail end of the CBC radio program called IDEAS on May 12th, 2026. Imagine my surprise when I heard my father’s name Otto Schaefer being spoken, and then the shock when I realized that he was being smeared. I heard things being said about my father which I knew to be false and unfounded. As soon as the program finished, I searched online and found the show in the CBC radio archive for that day and was able to listen to the entire broadcast. It was called “How Canada forgot it once had a segregated health system”, and the host was Nahlah Ayed. The discussion revolved around a book written by the late Elaine Dewar called “Oblivious: Residential Schools, Segregated Hospitals, and the use of Indigenous People as Slaves of Race Science”. Elaine Dewar had been interviewed shortly before she died, and the voice of her daughter and others who attended the recent book launch (posthumously for the author) were heard as well.
Otto Schaefer worked for many years at the Charles Camsell Hospital in Edmonton, and he was the founding Director of the Northern Medical Research Unit of the Department of National Health and Welfare Canada during the nineteen-sixties, seventies and eighties. He dedicated his life to the health and wellbeing of the aboriginal peoples of the north, in particular the Inuit. But because of my father’s country of origin – Germany ‒ and because of the time during which he attained his medical degree ‒ WW2 ‒ Elaine Dewar made assumptions about his motivation and about his goals, none of which she could verify. In her own words, all her red flags went up when she saw his name and learned from where and whence he came, because she was “a Jewish girl”. The host had introduced her as a Holocaust survivor one generation removed.
During the program the term “medical experiments” was used repeatedly, thus invoking rather sinister images. Conducting research on the health of the Inuit during a time of rapid changes in their lifestyle and nutrition is a very different thing from doing “medical experimentation”.
Elaine Dewar characterized Otto Schaefer’s research as “nonsense studies”. For example, she scoffed at his study of differing alcohol metabolic rates in different peoples. It just so happens that my father’s motivation to study this came after he found that the Whitehorse police were consistently releasing Caucasians from the “drunk tank” sooner than the Indians, after collecting the drunks off the streets the night before. (Presumably they were being protected from violence or from freezing to death in case they passed out on a cold winter night.) Schaefer complained to the police that they were being racist, always letting the White guys out first. So the Police Chief invited him, “Otto, please come tomorrow morning, and you make the determination whom to let out, and when.” Lo and behold, Otto found that the Whites were completely sober, but the Indians were still drunk in the morning. My father, having a curious mind and being very scientifically oriented, then set out to determine why this was so.
By coincidence some years later, a Swedish acquaintance of mine wrote to ask me if there was any connection between myself and Dr. Otto Schaefer, and I proudly told him that I was his daughter. This man had come across Schaefer’s ground-breaking research which explained the differences in metabolic processes between races on account of different enzymes which were either present or not. It seems to me this information is actually quite important. But according to Elaine Dewar, this was a “nonsense study”. And she called it racist. Ironically, it was my father’s concern about police racism which led him to conduct the study.
Elaine Dewar also spoke about the fact that Schaefer was the organizer of “so-called consent”, again, mocking him. She said that whichever language he was speaking [he spoke German, English, Inuktitut, and French], “everyone said it all sounded German anyway, so nobody could understand him.” Therefore she concluded that their informed consent was meaningless.
I can surmise wherefrom Dewar got this idea. It so happens that our family donated all of Otto Schaefer’s papers, books, slides, and journals to the University of Alberta. We felt that his important life’s work would be of greater use there than in one of his children’s basements. [Would we do that if we had any doubt about his impeccable character and integrity?] Elaine Dewar had access to all those donated materials. So, what might she have found that led her to the above mockery?
My father was a very humble man, and he liked to tell a self-deprecating humorous story about one of his lectures which he had delivered in French. He had started his talk with an apology for his imperfect French. A colleague in the audience quipped in a joking manner, “that’s okay Otto, it all sounds German anyway!” and everyone laughed. My father kept detailed journals and I imagine this was in one of those journals which Dewar had read.
Otto worked very hard at learning Inuktitut, the native language of the Inuit. He also made use of interpreters, to be certain of clear communication. The very doctor who was responsible for and insistent upon the informed consent protocol was now being slandered by Elaine Dewar as having done exactly the opposite. She had no hard data for her defamation of a much-loved and respected doctor. I say much-loved, because I was astonished and moved by the volume of tributes and letters we received from the north, from the Inuit people themselves, after his death in 2009. It was clear that they dearly loved my father.
Otto Schaefer quarrelled many times with his boss, the Deputy Minister for Northern and Indian Affairs, because he was constantly advocating for the Inuit. He was a man of integrity and compassion. He had great respect for the Native people and their ability to survive and thrive in such a harsh environment. When he saw injustice, he sought to rectify the situation.
In 2021 there were rumours and allegations about medical experiments and bodies buried on the grounds of the Charles Camsell hospital. The owner of the former hospital conducted an investigation. He excavated the grounds and found nothing. However, it leaves me to wonder if Dewar was still affected by those false rumours when she made her unsubstantiated remarks about “experiments”.
The Canadian government apology to the Inuit just over a year-and-a-half ago for the alleged slaughter of a thousand sled dogs during the 1950s and 60s has relevance to this current complaint. I wrote a letter at that time to the CBC but never received a response. Here is the link to the article I published, which includes my letter: https://freespeechmonika.com/another-canadian-apology-for-alleged-wrongs-the-slaughter-of-inuit-sled-dogs/
The IDEAS program “How Canada forgot it once had a segregated health system”has put a blot on the reputation of my father. That stain must be removed. The CBC must publicly retract the defamatory statements made on that program, and make a public apology for having allowed all those unsubstantiated statements and accusations against the late Dr. Otto Schaefer.
I look forward to a positive response about this serious matter.
Bill Whatcott in Menomonee Falls WI witnessing with Missionaries to thePre-BornBill’s friend Mark and a couple other Missionaries to the Pre-born witnessing across the street in Menomonee Falls WI
Video of Bill and a number of local Christians preaching to sodomites and transvestites at a pervertfest in Racine Wisconson
Dear Freinds,
Please pray for travel mercies as I head back to Alberta tomorrow. I had a very fruitful time ministering to the unborn and sodomites in the state of Wisconsin. This trip through the United States on my way back from my latest so-called “hate crime” trial has really brought home to me how much Canada and the United States have drifted apart. Since, I have been away, Canada has passed Bill C-9 banning so-called hate symbols and removing the “good faith” religious defense when one is charged with Wilful Promotion of Hatred.
During the last 10 years Liberal governments have been incrementally chipping away at fundamental rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, property rights and especially firearms rights, and expanding fake rights such as euthanasia, sexual deviance, and legalized (sometimes taxpayer funded), illicit drug use. Canada is a darker, less prosperous place than it use to be. Being in the USA there is work to do to keep the nation free and morally coherent (as evidenced in the video and pictures above), but there is a more receptive public and a freer atmosphere politically to share the law and Gospel.
Please pray for me as I await my final court judgment on September 16, 2026 at the University Park Courthouse in Toronto. I believe I lost this time; even though I had the so-called religious defense it was obvious to me that it was worth very little when Justice Molloy opined “you can’t rely on a good faith religious argument when you are clearly not acting with good faith by promoting hate.” Strangely, hate in this context is telling sodomites to keep their pants up as their favourite sex practices puts them and others at high risk of a host of maladies that I listed in my flyer at the 2016 Toronto sodomite parade and got prosecuted for. Such is the sorry state of Canada and its judiciary.
Protect Children: Remove Pride and Gender Events from Our Libraries
CitizenGO – started this petition to Toronto Public Library Board: Alim Remtulla (Chair), Jonathan Hoss (Vice Chair), Sakariya Ahmed, Deputy Mayors Paul Ainslie & Amber Morley, Tamara Balan, Serda Evren, Ben Liu, Amina Mohamed, Soo Wong – 2026/06/17
Your tax dollars are paying for drag performers to entertain toddlers – and you probably had no idea.
The Toronto Public Library’s own event catalogue tells the story plainly. As of June 10, 2026, TPL lists 41 Pride, drag, and gender-identity events for Preschool Children aged 0 to 5:
Drag Bingo, Drag Story Time with Messy Margaret, Fay and Fluffy’s Storytime, and a Library Pride Parade for babies as young as zero.
Another 29 events target children aged 6 to 12.
These listings were not compiled by outside critics; they were categorized by library staff in the library’s searchable database using the library’s age categories.
The performers behind these events have been remarkably candid about their purpose. Messy Margaret told a Toronto newspaper last year that his mission at these library storytimes is to ensure children know becoming a drag queen is an option for them, because he believes at least one child in every room will grow up to question their sexuality, and he wants to make sure that child sees drag as a path. Fay and Fluffy’s own published mission makes the same agenda explicit: their storytime targets what they call “gender-variant children.”
These are not neutral performers who happen to read picture books; they are activists with a stated goal, and TPL has been handing them a publicly funded platform to pursue it since at least 2017.
A child of two cannot weigh adult identity messaging.
Libraries already separate children’s, teen, and adult content in every other programming context, and there is no reason that standard should not apply here. The case for pulling these events is straightforward: publicly funded children’s programming should not be a platform for performers who have openly declared their goal is to indoctrinate children into their own sexually explicit lifestyles.
The accountability runs deeper than it might appear.
Two of the ten people on the TPL Board are not library appointees; they are elected city councillors. Deputy Mayor Paul Ainslie and Deputy Mayor Amber Morley sit on this Board as sitting members of City Council, answerable to ward voters, and this October every seat on Toronto City Council is up for re-election.
A Board member who also holds elected office has every reason to want this resolved before it becomes a ballot question,and a petition with thousands of names is exactly the kind of constituent signal that does not get quietly filed away.
The programming runs through June and July.
Once these events pass off the calendar, the window for pressure closes.
Sign this petition now and tell Chair Alim Remtulla, Vice-Chair Jonathan Hoss, Sakariya Ahmed, Deputy Mayor Paul Ainslie, Tamara Balan, Serda Evren, Ben Liu, Amina Mohamed, Deputy Mayor Amber Morley, and Soo Wong to remove all Pride, drag, and gender-identity programming from Toronto Public Libraries.
HAMILTON’S SOCIALIST MAYOR & ASSORTED OPPONENTS OF FREE SPEECH SEEK TO STOP DOMINION SOCIETY’S IMMIGRATION CONFERENCE`
[Hamilton’s socialist Mayor Andrea Horwath may proclaim tolerance, but not of dissenting views on immigration. Note how “anti-racism” is not only a code word for anti-White, but also anti-free speech. The fatuous Mayor even talks of denying the Dominion Society the right to meet in public spaces. But listen, you dumpy tyrants, they’re PUBLIC, meaning belonging to all of us. Notice that the Mayor smears criticism of Canada’s catastrophic policy of immigration replacement as “hate”.]
`Strategy’ forming to oppose anti-immigration group
Local antiracism network coordinates municipal response as controversial `nationalist’ group plans event in Hamilton in August
The Hamilton Spectator
13 Jun 2026
FALLON HEWITT REPORTER FALLON HEWITT IS A REPORTER AT THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR. FHEWITT@TORSTAR.CA
Mayor Andrea Horwath says she will be ensuring the city “remains vigilant and clear that events spreading messages of hate and intolerance are not welcome” in city facilities or public spaces.
Hamilton’s socialist Mayor Andrea Horwath may proclaim tolerance, but not of dissenting views on immigration. Note how “anti-racism” is not only a code word for anti-White, but also anti-free speech. The fatuous Mayor even talks of denying the Dominion Society the right to meet in public spaces. But listen, you dumpy tyrants, they’re PUBLIC, meaning belonging to all of us. Notice that the Mayor smears criticism of Canada’s catastrophic policy of immigration replacement as “hate”. “Local anti-racism network coordinates municipal response as controversial `nationalist’ group plans event in Hamilton in August. Mayor Andrea Horwath says she will be ensuring the city ‘remains vigilant and clear that events spreading messages of hate and intolerance are not welcome’ in city facilities or public spaces. A controversial anti-immigration group is planning to host a national conference in the Hamilton area this summer — prompting local anti-racism organizations to work on a “collaborative strategy” to respond.
The Dominion Society of Canada announced in May that it would be hosting its first national conference, known as “DomCon,” in the Hamilton area on Aug. 29. The group publicly calls for the “remigration” — or mass deportation — of anyone not descended from Anglo or French settlers of Canada. The society’s website blames “mass immigration” for low wages, a lack of jobs and housing, as well as overstretched healthcare and education systems.
On its website, the Dominion Society explicitly bases its platform on the “Great Replacement” theory, stating that “native born Canadians are being replaced in our own domestic workforce” and calling for an “11step plan” to enforce “the return of foreigners to their respective homelands.” The group’s literature targets specific demographics, writing that “Canada is not getting more `diverse,’ it’s getting more Indian.” The Canadian Anti-Hate Network has characterized the organization as the political wing of a broader white nationalist movement. … Lyndon George, executive director of the Hamilton Anti- Racism Resource Centre (HARRC), [who is Black] told The Spectator his team learned of the event in late May, spurring a meeting with leaders from the Hamilton Centre for Civic Inclusion and the Social Planning and Research Council of Hamilton to create a “collaborative strategy.” George said part of that strategy includes local organizations working with the city and nearby municipalities to ensure they understand “signs of hate,” and to provide information to restaurants and venues on how the group “may be operating and disguising their bookings.” George also called on area politicians and economic development departments to make it clear that Hamilton and the surrounding regions are “not a welcoming environment for” anti-immigration and White nationalist groups. “This is not a group that you want to welcome here,” said George. “But this is not something that the community can take on alone.” (Hamilton Spectator, June 13, 2026) Notice that the Hamilton Centre for Civic inclusion is plotting to find ways to exclude the Dominion Society. You can’t make this stuff up!
EDMONTON. June 9, 2026. Today after a short court appearance, political prisoner Brad Love was released and told all charges would be dropped at a further court appearance in two weeks.
“I was scooped and spent 26 days in prison for nothing,” an angry Mr. Love told CAFE. He’d been arrested May 13 at his Fort McMurray residence, not allowed to get his pants or wallet or ID. He spent the first night in an RCMP cell in Fort McMurray without blankets on the concrete cell floor. Four days later he was transferred to Edmonton Remand Centre five hours away.
The charges were “breach of probation” for trespassing on some woman’s lawn and whacking a security camera with a stick. Mr. Love denied the charges and said bus transfers would prove he was elsewhere at the time of the alleged incidents. The RCMP who make a habit of harassing the outspoken free thinker slapped the handcuffs on anyway.
In court today, the Crown admitted that the video of the event confirmed that the whacker with a stick was not Mr. Love and a “witness” had recanted.
Fort McMurray is awash in drugs, Indian public drunkenness is a scandal and White tweekers, Indian drunks and numerous Third World newcomers fail to pay bus fare, but the local RCMP are fixated on Bad Love. After his arrest, they entered his dwelling, apparently, without a warrant and questioned his room mates as to whether Mr. Love made racial remarks. Whether he does or doesn’t is irrelevant to the bogus charges at issue.
Mr. Love described his release. He had $1,500 in his canteen — his money transferred by family members. The prison authorities would only hand over $500, the rest to come later. {How can they get away with this?] So, with no ID or credit card, Mr. Love had to find his way back to Fort McMurray. With no ID, he couldn’t board a plane. Finally, he persuaded a cab driver to accept $500, with the remaining $300 on arrival.
Of the 35 inmates released with Mr. Love, 25 were Indians. None had money. They were given bus passes to head downtown to the Indian Friendship Centre.