UPDATE ON ADAM SKELLY’S COVID CASE: Adam Skelly – Justice Denied in Court! BY DEREK SLOAN

Adam Skelly – Justice Denied in Court!

Last time we spoke, Adam Skelly’s legal showdown was about to begin. After 6 years of twists, turns, and multiple near-death experiences, Adam’s case finally got its day in court in February. His lawyer presented all the elaborate evidence with 6 high-level experts, while the government had 1 expert. In a shocking outcome, the application was denied, without Adam’s evidence being so much as mentioned.

Adam’s team released a statement which stated in part: “[we] are disappointed, disheartened and frankly, disturbed at the outcome of the [hearing]…the application judge said near the end of the hearing she would judge this matter on its merits. Unfortunately, she did not.” Adam’s team says the judge “disappeared 500 pages of unrefuted, expert evidence.”

On Thursday of this week, I will have a brand new interview with Adam to share all the details.

As you know, this has been one of the craziest legal sagas of the decade, with multiple ups-and-downs, and multiple “near-death” experiences, including a critical public health expert dropping out, and the government requiring over $30,000 in costs to keep the case going. All of these challenges have been met and overcome by Adam and his team.

Adam Skelly was the one of the first people to stand against the government’s draconian lockdowns in 2020. Before Heroic Pastors, before the Freedom Convoy, Adam Skelly exploded onto the scene by opening up his restaurant, Adamson BBQ, defying the lockdowns, and became the first business owner in the history of Canada (even North America) to be arrested for disobeying a public health order (truly shocking).

Adam is the only person left with standing in court to challenge the government’s emergency lockdowns during COVID. Therefore it is critical that this case goes forward. No one else can bring a case to challenge the governments action during covid as the 2 year limitations period has passed, and there are no other cases in the court system already.

Adam’s team has already filed their appeal. The judge did not even mention any of their 500 pages of evidence. The government didn’t even try to refute it or discredit Adam’s experts. They just simply ignored it. Adam’s team believes this is a critical and appealable mistake by the judge who was supposed to give a fair hearing where all of the evidence would be weighed.

This case is going forward to the Ontario Court of Appeal – and Adam needs your help to see it through. Would you please support Adam today?

https://www.fundingthefight.ca/donate_adam

Adam’s team, in their statement, go on to say that the principles of fundamental justice are rooted in the pursuit of truth, fairness and unbiased proceedings. They believe that the “truth-seeking function of the court was plainly and obviously unfulfilled.”

As for the evidence, Adam’s team says the preponderance of evidence has been in their favour since it was initially sworn in 2021. However, even though the judge mentioned the province’s lone expert (Dr. Hodge) 16 separate times, and Dr. Devilla (former Toronto officer of health) or the Ministry of Health over 100 times, she mentioned Adam’s 6 experts a total of zero times.

This failure to grapple with their evidence is a fatal flaw of this ruling. Adam’s case had six high-level PhD or MD experts including Dr. Harvey Risch from Yale, and Dr. Byram Bridle. That not one of them was mentioned is really unbelievable.

Adam’s case is significant because his legal defense is going to the heart of the COVID narrative relied on by the government. Some other cases have failed because the basic tenets of the pandemic have been conceded, and the argument became about whether the government’s response was reasonable. Unfortunately, without arguing over the basic definitions of what happened during COVID-19, it’s very challenging to win a case.

Adam has has been through many ups and downs including having to shut down his three restaurants. He’s now living in Alberta, homesteading and making a living through a small farming operation. This is very challenging work, as you can imagine. Nonetheless, he has not given up on this case, and the events that took so much from him.

My new interview with Adam will be out later this week.

Adam’s story begins early in 2020, during the first lockdowns, when Adam made the courageous decision to open up his famous BBQ restaurant in Etobicoke, notwithstanding lockdown orders. The police changed his locks, but he broke into his own restaurant, defying the prohibition. As Adam relates the story, over 250 police were called to deal with the situation, even horse mounted cavalry, and he was hauled off to jail, but not before making news all across the country.

In our last interview, Adam told us the full extent of the assault by government. For example, Adam has received both provincial and criminal charges for trying to keep his restaurant open, and the outcome of this hearing will impact all of them.

He says the Toronto Board of Health has come after him in a civil claim, trying to get their $187,000 back that they spent to hire the police to shut down Adam’s restaurant! As Adam says: “Remember the videos from that protest? They had the street for like half a km in each direction full of police cars, there must have been 80 police cruisers, both lanes totally blocked…Costco just up the street was packed full of people [shopping normally]…they hired Toronto police…paid them overtime…the mounted unit, [my] whole building covered with police shoulder to shoulder. They spent $187,000 enforcing the closure order, and now they’re trying to recover that money from me, we countersued, and brought Eileen Devilla into it, saying she acted outside of her authority as the medical officer of health.” It’s not enough they destroyed his business, they want him to pay for the police used to do it.

As for this hearing, as I’ve mentioned before, they tried various tricks to shut down Adam’s case before it even had it’s day in court. For example, they required Adam to come up with 30k to even have the case heard, as “security” for costs. But with your help, we helped him meet that challenge, and Adam was able to schedule his hearing for last October! They then required his expert evidence to be resworn, which caused the issue with the one expert who didn’t want to recommit.

Adam stood out on a limb and became a major focal point for freedom in Canada. Adam’s case is the last chance we have to challenge the government’s actions during COVID-19. Adam must appeal this case, for all of us. He is the only one left with standing to challenge the government’s actions during COVID. Will you help today?

Please help Adam raise $60,000 to complete this case.

https://www.fundingthefight.ca/donate_adam

Adam’s appeal being shut down is disheartening, but in a case of this magnitude, it would have been appealed by the government in any event if Adam had won. In all likelihood, this kind of case must go to the Supreme Court of Canada.

On the bright side, Adam recently received an offer to settle his criminal charges he received for breaking the locks on his own property. He will get away with a small charitable donation, some community service, and most importantly no criminal record. With his loss in this constitutional case, they could have hammered him harder, but they chose not to. That’s good news.

Even though Adam has had to give up his life and restaurants in Ontario, he has a thriving farm, family, and faith life in Alberta.

This appeal must go forward. I’m so proud of the courage and tenacity of Adam and his team.

Even though he lost his restaurants and his life in Ontario, he’s not backing down.

Adam Skelly’s case was one of the first prominent COVID-19 cases filed, please support him to continue it.

Stay tuned for more details!

Thanks so much for your support!

God bless!

Anti-Hate Psyop: The SPLC Indictment and Its Chilling Parallels to Canada’s Anti-Hate Network

Anti-Hate Psyop: The SPLC Indictment and Its Chilling Parallels to Canada’s Anti-Hate Network

This is no longer just about monitoring extremism. It is about whether anti-hate organizations have crossed into actively manufacturing it.

In a bombshell development south of the border, the U.S. Department of Justice has indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) on 11 federal counts—including wire fraud, bank fraud, and conspiracy to commit money laundering—accusing the storied “civil rights” nonprofit of secretly funneling more than $3 million in donor funds to leaders and members of the very extremist groups it claims to oppose. The indictment, returned by a grand jury in Montgomery, Alabama, on April 21, 2026, paints a picture of systematic deception: the SPLC allegedly manufactured the “hate” it fundraised against, while concealing payments through fictitious entities and prepaid gift cards.

This isn’t abstract legal wrangling. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche stated bluntly: “The SPLC was not dismantling these groups. It was instead manufacturing the extremism it purports to oppose by paying sources to stoke racial hatred.” FBI Director Kash Patel echoed that the group “lied to their donors… and actually turned around and paid the leaders of these very extremist groups—even utilizing the funds to have these groups facilitate the commission of state and federal crimes.”

For Canadians following the Canadian Anti-Hate Network (CAHN)—an organization that openly models itself after the SPLC—the indictment raises urgent questions. CAHN received startup funding from the SPLC, shares intelligence with it, and employs similar monitoring tactics. Its board includes figures like Richard Warman and Kurt Phillips, both accused of infiltrating or posing within neo-Nazi online spaces. CAHN has heavily influenced Canadian policy, from the Online Harms Act to calls for a “pro-democracy movement” funded to counter protests. Critics ask: Is this the same playbook—posing, inflating threats, and driving censorship—now playing out north of the border?

The SPLC’s Alleged Scheme: Funding Hate to Fight Hate

According to the DOJ, the fraud ran from at least 2014 to 2023. The SPLC allegedly paid at least eight individuals tied to violent extremist networks, including the Ku Klux Klan, United Klans of America, National Socialist Movement (American Nazi Party), Aryan Nations-affiliated Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club, and organizers linked to the 2017 Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally.

Methods of concealment and “driving hate”:

  • The SPLC created bank accounts under at least five fictitious entities with no real business purpose.
  • Funds were wired through these shells, then loaded onto prepaid gift cards and physically delivered to sources—hiding the SPLC’s involvement from donors and banks.
  • One informant, paid over $270,000 across eight years, was a member of the online leadership chat that planned Unite the Right. The indictment alleges he made racist postings “under the supervision of the SPLC,” helped coordinate transportation to the deadly rally, and even sent funds onward to other extremist leaders.

The core fraud, per prosecutors: Donors were told their money would “dismantle white supremacy.” Instead, it allegedly subsidized the very people the SPLC publicly denounced—creating a self-sustaining cycle of manufactured extremism to justify endless fundraising and relevance. The SPLC denies the allegations, calling them “politically motivated” and claiming payments were legitimate confidential-informant work shared with law enforcement. The program has since been halted.

CAHN’s Direct Ties to the SPLC

CAHN, founded in 2018, has never hidden its admiration for the SPLC. Its own statements and parliamentary briefs describe the organization as “modelled after and supported by” the SPLC. It received a $25,000 startup grant from the SPLC (with “no strings attached,” per CAHN) and lists the U.S. group as a past funder. CAHN exchanges information on threats and hate groups with the SPLC on an ad-hoc basis and positions itself as Canada’s version of the SPLC’s “Hate Map.”

Board members include Bernie Farber (Chair Emeritus), Evan Balgord (Executive Director), and others who have defended the SPLC model. CAHN has received Canadian government grants (via Canadian Heritage and Public Safety Canada) while mirroring the SPLC’s approach: monitoring, profiling, and advising policymakers.

Posing as Neo-Nazis: The Warman and Phillips Playbook

The parallels to the SPLC’s alleged informant tactics are striking—and documented in Canadian records.

Richard Warman, CAHN board member and longtime legal activist, admitted under oath to creating pseudonyms (“Axetogrind” and “Pogue Mahone”) on neo-Nazi forums like Stormfront.org and Vanguard News Network between 2004 and 2005. He posted messages echoing the group’s rhetoric, including “Keep up the good work Commander Schoep!” (referring to a U.S. neo-Nazi leader) and using coded white-supremacist language like “88.” Warman said this was undercover intelligence-gathering for Section 13 hate-speech complaints under the Canadian Human Rights Act. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (in Warman v. Ouwendyk, 2009) called his actions “disappointing and disturbing,” ruling they “diminish[ed] his credibility” and could have “precipitated further hate messages from forum members.”

Kurt Phillips (also known as Curt Phillips in some references), another CAHN board member and former operator of the Anti-Racist Canada blog, has faced similar accusations. Critic Elisa Hategan has publicly referenced text correspondence with Phillips, alleging he engaged in comparable posing or infiltration tactics within far-right circles to gather (and potentially amplify) material for exposure. While Phillips’ public role has centred on archiving and doxxing, critics argue his methods blurred into provocation—much like Warman’s admitted posts.

CAHN itself has described using “infiltration-style methods” to expose far-right activity, echoing the SPLC’s now-indicted informant program.

Barbara Perry’s Shielded “300 Hate Groups” and CAHN’s Censorship Recommendations

CAHN and aligned researchers like Ontario Tech University’s Dr. Barbara Perry have cited figures of nearly 300 far-right or hate groups in Canada (up from ~100 in a 2015 study). These numbers, drawn from Perry’s work, have been central to CAHN’s development of policy recommendations and underpin calls for expanded monitoring and legislation. Yet Perry’s methodology has drawn sharp criticism as activist-driven: it reportedly includes loose affiliations, online forums, and even mainstream conservative expressions. A 2024 ruling by Ontario’s privacy commissioner blocked public release of Perry’s full list, shielding the data from scrutiny despite its influence on policy and public funding.

https://platform.twitter.

Critics, including in National Post commentary, have asked, If there are truly 300 active neo-Nazi groups, why can’t independent researchers name and verify them? The opacity raises the same “manufactured threat” questions now facing the SPLC.

Evan Balgord has appeared on multiple podcasts and in policy forums, urging government action on online “hate,” frequently citing these statistics as justification. He has recommended mechanisms akin to a digital commission or oversight body—ideas that materialized in the federal Online Harms Act. CAHN’s submissions to Parliament and toolkits have shaped recommendations on content moderation, school reporting, and countering “far-right” influence. Most of CAHN’s internet-censorship proposals have either been proposed or implemented by Ottawa.

CAHN has also sought government funding for what Balgord described as a “pro-democracy movement” to counter right-wing protests and populism. Public records and critics’ analyses show grants flowing to CAHN for workshops, investigations, and social-media engagement—sometimes targeting conservative student groups, the People’s Party of Canada (PPC), or even COVID-protest participants as “anti-democratic.”

Targeting Mainstream Conservatives—and the Big Question

Like the SPLC (which has labelled mainstream conservative organizations as “hate groups”), CAHN has documented ties between conservative campus clubs and fringe elements, or flagged “paleoconservative” rhetoric as sanitized extremism. Its toolkits urge educators to watch for signs like support for certain politicians or traditional values—blurring lines between extremism and legitimate dissent.

This brings us to the most explosive parallel: Could covert funding methods (prepaid cards, shells) be replicated here—not just for monitoring, but for provocation? The SPLC indictment alleges gift-card payments to extremists. CAHN receives public funds and has ties to counter-protest networks (including documented encouragement of Antifa-style “muscular resistance”). Critics openly ask: Are some grants subsidizing online trolls, protest infiltrators, or Antifa actors to inflate hate statistics, justify censorship legislation like the Online Harms Act, and destabilize democratic discourse?

No evidence directly links CAHN to the SPLC’s specific fraud scheme. CAHN insists its work is ethical, independent monitoring to protect vulnerable communities from real threats. Yet the pattern—posing in extremist spaces, inflated/shielded stats, policy capture, and targeting conservatives—mirrors the SPLC’s alleged playbook too closely for comfort.

A Political Psyop? The Question Canadians Must Confront

The SPLC indictment rips the lid off how a nonprofit can allegedly profit from the very division it claims to combat—paying extremists through shells and gift cards to keep the “hate” machine running, all while donors foot the bill for a never-ending crisis. In Canada, CAHN’s SPLC-inspired model operates with the full backing of government grants, shaping everything from the Online Harms Act to taxpayer-funded “pro-democracy” counter-protests. Warman’s admitted forum posts as a faux neo-Nazi, Phillips’ alleged infiltration via text messages, Perry’s activist-driven and now-shielded “300 hate groups” tally, and Balgord’s repeated calls for digital oversight all point to a closed-loop system: provoke or amplify the threat, document the resulting “spike” in hate, then cash in with policy demands and more funding.

This is no longer just about monitoring extremism. It is about whether anti-hate organizations have crossed into actively manufacturing it, using secrecy, infiltration, and opaque statistics to justify censorship laws, deplatforming, and the erosion of free speech. The SPLC precedent makes the Canadian parallels impossible to ignore. Are Canadian taxpayers unknowingly subsidizing the same self-perpetuating cycle of manufactured threats that the DOJ has now exposed south of the border?

The public deserves straight answers. If these tactics are at play here, the cost isn’t just wasted donations—it’s the slow destabilization of democratic debate itself.

Free Speech Martyr Bill Whatcott’s Election Results and “Hate Crime” Trial Update

Free Speech Martyr Bill Whatcott’s Election Results and “Hate Crime” Trial Update

Dear Friends,

Lots has happened the last few days. My court hearing for my so-called hate crime charge on Thursday, April 9th was a clown show. Unfortunately, most of my supporters were not allowed access to the hearing and my case is now subject to a publication ban so I can’t say much about it. The trial is slated to run:

May 25, 2026 – June 12, 2026, 9 am – 4:00 pm

Ontario Superior Court, 361 University Ave, Toronto, ON

If you are close to Toronto and want to know what is going on I suggest you try to show up. The trial is otherwise subject to a publication ban, so I can’t say much and the court at least on this past Thursday, just ignored my friend’s requests to log in via Zoom to see the hearing.

To learn about my “hate crime”, how me and 6 other brave Crack Christian Commandos infiltrated the Toronto homosexual unGodly pride parade disguised as Gay Zombie Cannabis Consumers and shared the Gospel with 3000 lost sodomites and how this charitable act culminated in a $104 million class action lawsuit where Prime Minister Trudeau himself and the Liberal Party were named as victims and then how that escalated to a Canada wide arrest warrant, go to my Lifefunder link to read the history and if you wish you can help me out as I languish in Toronto for the next 6 weeks while preparing to go on trial:

https://www.lifefunder.com/whatcott/

Anyways, after my “hate crime” hearing wrapped up, Thursday got worse. I finished my last 100 election flyers and then sat down on the steps of a business at Spadina and College in Downtown Toronto to rest a few minutes and take my backpack with my laptop off my back to give my shoulders a few minutes break. When I got up to go I forgot my backpack was no longer on my back and left my backpack on the porch of the business.

Anyways when I got to my room and realized I forgot my backpack and laptop, I got on my bike and flew like a bat out of hell to the porch where I left it. But alas! It is downtown Toronto (the formerly good) and unattended backpacks with laptops don’t last long when they are left lying around.

Then to make the day just a little worse while biking back to my room to contemplate replacing what I lost, I hit some uneven pavement that caught my bicycle tire and in less than a second I went from cycling to landing with my face on the pavement.

Amazingly, my face was ok, but my knee somehow got badly bruised and it swelled to twice it’s normal size, so I wound up bedridden for two days, but God in His mercy enabled me to get to church on Sunday.

Then Monday, April 13th, came and the election results came in.

University-Rosedale 2026 by-election results

In my mind the election is a mix of good and bad news. The bad news is I did not win. The $200,000 salary which Trudeau himself proved as Prime Minister is a salary with no actual attendance requirement and the gold plated MP pension plan is not mine to have. The other piece of bad news is this riding had the opportunity to adopt my Christ centred, conservative, pro-energy, pro-free market, pro-freedom, pro-life, pro-heterosexual, pro-animal eaters rights, pro-gun, pro-Trump, vision for Canada, and to their loss University-Rosedale, Downtown Toronto, opted for something else.

The riding went 64% (nearly 20,000 votes) for the Liberals and Danielle Martin their University-Rosedale MP. Danielle is a physician and University of Toronto academic who has written favourably for left wing concepts like universal basic income, abortion, and coercing doctors to make referrals for euthanasia. Most of those in the riding who did not join the 2/3 who overwhelmingly voted for the Liberals and Danielle Martin, went even further left voting NDP 18.9%, and Green 2.9%. Basically 86% of the riding voted for left and far left.

Myself and the PPC were the actual conservatives in the riding and combined we got less than 1% of the vote. I suppose I was the most conservative and the most Christ Centred and I secured 0.1% of the vote (36 votes).

The other inependants had varied campaigns. Most of them were socialist and pro-abortion. Les Bory was openly pro-life for unborn children and had some really good ideas like gun rights and freedom of speech rights. But Les also has some left wing, authoritarian ideas like universal healthcare and using the Canadian Armed Forces to keep Albertans from separating from Canada. Combined, the rest of the independents came in with less than 1% of the vote.

Anyway, the good news is 2000 Whatcott election flyers hit one of woke Canada’s wokest neighbourhoods with the uncensored Gospel. Each flyer had God’s Scripture promise, a powerful verse that has been known to bring people to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ on its own.

“For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.” John 3:16

Each flyer also had a murdered unborn child, a shot crow that became a tasty soup, and a naked sodomite hugging our current Prime Minister; along with common sense Christian, conservative ideas that triggered the woke and made some of them call 911 after reading my flyer and in other cases chase me around university campuses, apartment hallways, and down a variety of streets screaming after reading my flyer.

Another positive for this election campaign is I had people call me from locations as diverse as Weyburn SK, Pembroke ON, St Catharines ON, and Vancouver, informing me that both individually and in prayer groups, me and my election campaign, were being prayed for. God was there.

The final piece of good news. The Biblical city of Sodom and University-Rosedale Downtown Toronto have a lot in common. Both places are Godless, sexually degenerate, and ripe for judgment. When the outcry against Sodom became too great, God sent angels to see if the charges were true and if so divine judgement was to be executed against the city.

Abraham interceded for Sodom and said:

“Let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak: Suppose thirty should be found there?”

So He said, “I will not do it if I find thirty there.” Genesis 18:30

God agreed to spare Sodom if just 30 righteous people could be found.

The election results are clear. Thirty six people viewed my election platform, graced with Scripture and sound Biblical promises to kick the sodomites out of government and into conversion therapy, and promises to restore legal protection for the unborn, the elderly, and the marginal. Thirty six University-Rosedale residents when offered this vision for Downtown Toronto voted for it.

To see Bill’s election flyer go here: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3toa5xo4ijf6xbjygjrvs/Vote-Bill-Whatcott-Your-common-sense-social-conservative-candidate.pdf?rlkey=q7tzatrvcozc1oqce97wyyrn9&st=sn654p5b&dl=0

There is still more hope for Downtown Toronto and Canada than there was for Sodom when God poured out His wrath on the corrupt city.

In Christ’s Service, Bill Whatcott

However, we speak wisdom among those who are mature, yet not the wisdom of this age, nor of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing. But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, the hidden wisdom which God ordained before the ages for our glory,  which none of the rulers of this age knew; for had they known, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory.” 1 Corinthians 2:6-8

Major Victory for Civil Liberties as Court Overturns Woods Ban 🎉



Major Victory for Civil Liberties as Court Overturns Woods Ban 🎉



Major Victory for Civil Liberties as Court Overturns Woods Ban 🎉
Today, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia struck down last summer’s absurd provincial ban on walking, picnicking, and even birdwatching in the woods. In a decisive ruling, the Court agreed with the CCF that Premier Houston’s blanket prohibition on entering the woods violated Canadians’ Charter-protected mobility rights and failed to meaningfully consider the impact. The Court also raised concerns that the ban was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad – so unclear that people couldn’t know what qualified as “woods,” and so extreme that it applied even where no fire risk existed. We are proud to have fought this case and are grateful to our supporters, especially those who signed our petition last summer to restore access to Nova Scotia’s beautiful forests.

Sad Setback for Justice For Student Killed By COVID Shots: Ontario Court of Appeal Dismisses Lawsuit Over Teen Sean Hartman’s Death Following COVID-19 Vaccination

Sad Setback for Justice For Student Killed By COVID Shots: Ontario Court of Appeal Dismisses Lawsuit Over Teen Sean Hartman’s Death Following COVID-19 Vaccination

The Canadian IndependentApr 18
 
READ IN APP
 

In a significant decision released today, the Hartman v. Canada (Attorney General) ruling was upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeal, dismissing a lawsuit brought against the federal government over the death of a teenage boy following a COVID-19 vaccination. The court found that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and agreed with a lower court decision to strike it in its entirety.

The case was brought by Daniel Hartman, whose 17-year-old son, Sean Hartman, died in September 2021. Sean, who had been described as previously healthy, was found dead beside his bed 33 days after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Following the vaccination, he had been taken to hospital due to symptoms his father believes were related to the vaccine.

Sean’s father, Dan Hartman, says his son chose to get vaccinated so he could continue playing hockey, as vaccination was required for participation in many sports and activities at the time.

Hartman’s lawsuit alleged that federal officials, including the Minister of Health, were negligent in approving, promoting, and monitoring the vaccine, and that they acted with reckless indifference or wilful blindness to potential risks.

The Court of Appeal acknowledged the devastating nature of Sean Hartman’s death, describing it as a tragic loss for his family and community. However, the judges concluded that the legal claims could not succeed. Central to the ruling was the finding that the federal government does not owe a private duty of care to individual members of the public when making broad public health decisions during a pandemic. Instead, such decisions are made in the interest of the population as a whole, often requiring difficult trade-offs that may carry risks for some individuals.

The court also determined that the claim failed to establish the necessary elements for misfeasance in public office. Specifically, there were no material facts showing that government officials acted in bad faith or knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct that would likely cause harm to Sean Hartman. The judges noted that the clinical trial data referenced in the lawsuit supported the conclusion that the vaccine was highly effective, undermining the argument that officials knowingly promoted a harmful or ineffective product.

In addition, the court found that the public statements cited in the claim were directed broadly at Canadians and did not create a specific relationship or obligation toward Sean Hartman as an individual. As a result, there was no legal basis to establish the proximity or duty of care required for a negligence claim.

Shockingly, the court also claimed that allowing Hartman’s case to proceed could have broader consequences, including discouraging governments from making urgent public health decisions during emergencies due to fear of legal liability.

The Court of Appeal further upheld the lower court’s decision to deny leave to amend the claim, finding that the proposed changes would not have addressed the fundamental legal deficiencies. The judges emphasized that lawsuits must be based on clearly pleaded facts, not on the possibility that supporting evidence might emerge later.

Ultimately, the court concluded that while the circumstances surrounding Sean Hartman’s death are deeply tragic, the law does not support holding the federal government liable under the claims presented. The appeal was dismissed, bringing the case to a close, with no costs awarded to either side.

The Canadian Independent spoke with Dan Hartman by phone this evening. He said he is “seriously considering” taking the case to the Supreme Court and that he and his legal team will evaluate their next steps over the coming week. Hartman noted that the cost of taking the case to the Supreme Court could exceed $20,000. He added that he does not want to ask those who have already donated to his cause to contribute further but said, “What other option do I have?”

Dan believes the courts are not willing to find the government liable or hold it accountable, as doing so would amount to an admission of wrongdoing. He also argues that such a finding would make his larger lawsuit against Pfizer significantly easier to pursue.

If you want to donate to Dan’s legal fund, you can do so at the link below.

https://www.givesendgo.com/GAWYX

The Canadian Independent puts in countless hours exposing matters of public interest. Please consider donating to support our independent journalism.

Free­dom of speech at risk, ex-prof argues

Wid­dowson turns to court after talk shut down by protest

Free­dom of speech at risk, ex-prof argues

Wid­dowson turns to court after talk shut down by protest

National Post - (Latest Edition)

Jesse snyder

15 Apr 2026

EDMONTON • A former uni­versity pro­fessor who became a con­ten­tious fig­ure for ques­tion­ing claims about the exist­ence of Indi­gen­ous unmarked graves says the out­come of her ongo­ing court battle will set a cru­cial pre­ced­ent for aca­demic free­dom in Canada.

Frances Wid­dowson, who launched a legal chal­lenge against Uni­versity of Leth­bridge in July 2023, had her argu­ments heard by a Court of King’s Bench judge on Fri­day. Wid­dowson, a former Mount Royal Uni­versity pro­fessor, argues that the Uni­versity of Leth­bridge restric­ted her right to free speech when it can­celled her pub­lic talk in Feb­ru­ary 2023.

Black­foot First Nation pro­test­ers and other demon­strat­ors pres­sured the uni­versity to can­cel the event, and then-pres­id­ent Michael Mahon con­sen­ted to their calls amid what the school describes as secur­ity con­cerns. Wid­dowson — who has promp­ted sim­ilar protests at two other Cana­dian uni­versit­ies — said the can­cel­la­tion mir­rors a wor­ry­ing trend of cam­puses restrict­ing pre­cisely the sorts of open debates they are meant to encour­age.

Frances Wid­dowson says First Nations deserve to have their struggles addressed on a found­a­tion of truth.

“People need to take this ser­i­ously, because uni­versit­ies are incred­ibly import­ant insti­tu­tions in a demo­cratic soci­ety,” Wid­dowson said. “They let know­ledge be dis­sem­in­ated, they’re import­ant in the train­ing of pro­fes­sion­als, and are also a bul­wark against author­it­ari­an­ism. All of those func­tions now are under threat, because you have insti­tu­tions like the Uni­versity of Leth­bridge, which is not aca­demic at all any­more and has been com­pletely cap­tured by Indi­gen­iz­a­tion act­iv­ists.”

Court hear­ings have focused on whether the uni­versity had an oblig­a­tion to pro­tect free speech in the face of the alleged “very real harms” of host­ing the event, accord­ing to a legal brief filed to the court by Wid­dowson’s law­yer, Glenn Black­ett. Fol­low­ing Fri­day’s hear­ings, a rul­ing is expec­ted in the com­ing months.

Wid­dowson has attrac­ted oppos­i­tion primar­ily for work in which she has doubted the claims put for­ward about Indi­gen­ous unmarked graves in Canada, with a focus on Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc, pre­vi­ously known as the Kam­loops Indian Band, which has claimed that 215 “miss­ing chil­dren” are bur­ied in unmarked graves on the site of a former B.C. res­id­en­tial school.

Nearly five years after the ini­tial claim, however, the First Nation has not exhumed the remains of any chil­dren. In a Feb­ru­ary update, the First Nation said its invest­ig­a­tion using ground-pen­et­rat­ing radar is ongo­ing. Wid­dowson has made a point of emphas­iz­ing the lack of evid­ence, includ­ing in a 2025 You­tube doc­u­ment­ary called “What Remains: After­math of the Kam­loops Mass Grave Decep­tion.” (A 2021 Assembly of First Nations res­ol­u­tion referred to the Kam­loops claims as an example of “burial sites or mass graves.”)

Wid­dowson said it was an “open ques­tion” whether any chil­dren were secretly bur­ied on the Kam­loops site but said the alleg­a­tions need to be scru­tin­ized and sup­por­ted. The graves are reg­u­larly cited as evid­ence of Canada’s alleged gen­o­cide against First Nations.

“Claims should be

asser­ted

NEVER BEEN A COMPLAINT ABOUT THE QUALITY OR ETHICS OF HER SCHOLARSHIP.

on the basis of reason, evid­ence and logic, not the basis of a pre­scribed doc­trine,” she said.

The planned Feb­ru­ary 2023 event was about how “wokeism” was under­min­ing aca­demic free­dom. Wid­dowson agreed to the talk on the invit­a­tion of Paul Vimin­itz, a pro­fessor who the uni­versity later fired in 2024. (Vimin­itz was pre­vi­ously a party to Wid­dowson’s Court of King’s chal­lenge, and Jonah Pickle, a former stu­dent, is cur­rently an applic­ant).

Wid­dowson has since called on the Alberta gov­ern­ment to inter­vene in her case, but the gov­ern­ment has thus far declined.

Eliza­beth Harper, spokes­per­son for Advanced Edu­ca­tion Min­is­ter Myles Mcdou­gall, said the province’s uni­versit­ies are oblig­ated to report on their free speech policies, adding that “the Uni­versity of Leth­bridge has been asked to review their policies to ensure that they sup­port free speech.”

Mat­thew Wood­ley, a law­yer at Reyn­olds Mirth Richards & Farmer LLP who is rep­res­ent­ing the Uni­versity of Leth­bridge, was not avail­able for an inter­view, accord­ing to his assist­ant.

In a state­ment, Uni­versity of Leth­bridge spokes­per­son Tre­vor Ken­ney said that the same week of the can­celled talk, Wid­dowson led two other lec­tures at the uni­versity without incid­ent.

“The Uni­versity can­celled a room book­ing for an event involving Frances Wid­dowson as the res­ult of con­cerns relat­ing to pos­sible harms raised by mem­bers of the Uni­versity com­munity, includ­ing safety risks,” Ken­ney said.

On May 27, 2021, the Kam­loops Indian Band, or Tk’emlúps te Secwepemc, claimed it had loc­ated the remains of 215 chil­dren — “some as young as three years old” — in an apple orch­ard at a former res­id­en­tial school site. The claims were based on the res­ults of ground-pen­et­rat­ing radar, which is cap­able of detect­ing ground dis­turb­ances but does not con­firm the pres­ence of human remains.

The next month, the Cowessess First Nation in Saskat­chewan said it had found 751 poten­tial unmarked graves at a cemetery near the former Mer­ieval Indian Res­id­en­tial School. (The Cowessess chief emphas­ized at the time that they were not mass graves, but unmarked ones.)

Some cit­ies includ­ing Vic­toria can­celled their Canada Day cel­eb­ra­tions that year, while the gov­ern­ment ordered the Cana­dian flag on fed­eral build­ings to fly at half-mast for sev­eral months.

Wid­dowson said Canada’s First Nations deserve to have their many struggles addressed on a found­a­tion of truth.

“If we don’t have the truth, we will not be able to fig­ure out the best way to organ­ize soci­ety,” she said. “That’s what’s happened to Abori­ginal people now, is that they’re being fed a whole bunch of false­hoods, which are mak­ing it impossible for Abori­ginal people to thrive and live full lives in mod­ern soci­ety.”

In Decem­ber 2021, Mount Royal Uni­versity, Wid­dowson’s former employer, fired her over alleg­a­tions that a series of tweets she had pos­ted were a form of har­ass­ment.

In 2024, an arbit­rator found that Wid­dowson’s dis­missal was unwar­ran­ted and that, des­pite her con­tro­ver­sial views, there had “never been a com­plaint about the qual­ity or eth­ics of her schol­ar­ship.”

Whatcott Electioneering at the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Law and Faculty of Music Today

Whatcott Electioneering at the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Law and Faculty of Music Today

Bill Whatcott at the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Law

Dear Friends,

Today was a fruitful day electioneering at the University of Toronto, though I don’t think I am getting too many votes at this place.

Two of Canada’s potential lawyers, judges, politicians chasing Bill Whatcott and trying to get him to leave the U of T Faculty of Law building after some woke women who I assume were law students freaked out upon recieving my election material

At the Faculty of Law I started my electioneering on the top floor and worked my way down. On each floor students were studying at tables or having lunch and I would leave one of my flyers with them. I also slid my flyers under a number of doors as I walked down the hallways. I noted lots of sodomite pride flags around the Faculty of Law and maybe this explains why our judges and prosecutors think Gospel flyers critical of sodomy at an unGodly pride parade are a bigger threat to society than drug trafficking or auto theft.

Anyways, when I got to the library I handed out some of my election flyers there and then I noticed a few of the women who received my flyer started freaking out and reporting me to the librarian. I gave one to the librarian as well and walked out as she started babbling something or another at me. Then I went to the main floor and was blessed to walk into a cafeteria full of what looked like faculty members and students eating and socializing with eachother. I started giving my election flyer to people there and it wasn’t long before more women freaked out and then the two young men in the picture above started following me and tried to make me leave. Anyways, the young men disengaged after I took their photo and told them I have a Charter right to be there (R. v. Whatcott (W.), (2014) 464 Sask.R. 105 and R v Whatcott, 2012 ABQB 231 ). I handed out a few more flyers in the law faculty and then I made my way to the faculty of music.

I’m not much of a music connoisseur. I pretty much only listen to Christian pop or if I’m in the mood I might listen to my Florida trailer park sensation buddy James Carbonaro’s “Vote Bill Whatcott” song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3phrifalAI.

Anyways, the University of Toronto Faculty of Music was sort of a surreal experience. As I strolled up and down the hallways of the Faculty of Music what I heard seemed to be classical European music, violins, pianos, etc… I would poke my head in some classrooms and would see students, often young Chinese women, playing classical musical instruments and I would leave them my election flyer. But while going up and down the hallways and hearing this type of music my eyes would be assaulted with sodomite pride stickers littering the doors and windows of the Faculty of Music. And I had to ask myself what does celebrating buggery have to do with Beethoven?

Anyways, I leafletted the entire Faculty of Music and then headed back to the Faculty of Law to get my bicycle so I could go and electioneer in some of the surrounding neighbourhoods and then I ran into this campus security guard.

Campus Security guard on his phone reporting my location and in possession of a dozen or so of my election flyers.

When I saw the guard looking at me and in possession of a fist full of my flyers I decided to try to take a photo of him. He didn’t like that and tried to block his face with my flyers and tried to tell me I am not allowed to take pictures of him. I note when he was telling me that I can’t take a picture of him, he was doing a bad job of trying not to look like he was videotaping me. Anyways, I told the security guard I did not appreciate him stealing my flyers from students who needed them to make an informed vote, and I asked for my flyers back. To my surprise he gave them back to me. I handed a couple more flyers out to people standing in front to the Faculty of Law building and then I got on my bike and rode off to some neighbourhoods north of the University to make them aware of my Christ centred, conservative, pro-life, pro-heterosexual, pro-gun, pro-animal eaters rights, candidacy.

Anyways, I might get one vote from the U of T!

A young Christian fellow who wasn’t in law or music but rather math messaged me on Whats App and asked to do a coffee with me. When I got to the coffee shop he begged me not to cause a scene or expose that he was talking to me. Anyways, I promised him I keep people’s identity confidential if they don’t want to be publicly identified with me and I assured him that I could have a coffee without causing civil disorder. Anwyays, we had a nice conversation over coffee on the best strategy to protect Canada’s unborn children. We both agreed all unborn children needed to be protected, but maybe disagreed on how best to get there. My young friend believed we needed to pass a total abortion ban and should not support any law that offers anything less. I agreed that outlawing all abortion was a laudible goal, but I believe in a secular country like Canada we should be a little more pragmatic and realistic about what we can achieve.

I think getting any law on the books ie, 3rd trimester abortion ban, gender selective abortion ban, anything…, is worth supporting, as some children could be saved with these measures and of course we can still work towards making all abortion illegal eventually. Anyways, it was nice to talk to a young man who obviously is engaged with issues near and dear to my heart. He didn’t promise to vote for me. He said he was considering who to vote for. It seemed he was considering either me or the People’s Party of Canada (PPC) candidate Andy D’Andrea.

I don’t have anything bad to say about the PPC and even though I would like his vote, I didn’t try to discourage the young man from giving his vote to the PPC. Their leader Maxime Bernier is a true conservative. In my view, Mr. Bernier showed tremendous courage and integrity when he was arrested during the lockdowns for trying to hold a political rally in defiance of totalitarian public health orders. Though Mr. Bernier is not as pro-life as me, he has publicly stated his opposition to late term abortion, and he is willingness to outlaw the barbaric proceedure; unlike the Federal Conservatives who consistently protect late term abortion. Mr. Bernier welcomes pro-lifers into his party and refuses to cancel them when the media gets hysterical about something they might say, unlike Federal Conservatives who have thrown many pro-life MPs and candidates out of their party when they say something deemed too controversial (honest) for the legacy media’s liking.

But, in some ways my campaign is more truth oriented than the PPC campaign. I’ve seen their flyers aound the riding. They are silent on the sodomite agenda’s assault on our conscience and speech rights. They are silent on the unborn child’s suffering and Canada’s baby holocaust. I’m the only candidate publicly speaking about these issues.

Tomorrow, I should be able to get the last of my flyers into needy University-Rosedale mailboxes and then I will be at my friend Brother Phil’s house on election day, April 13th for a victory celebration as the election results are made public!

So-called “Hate Crime” update:

I have one more hearing before my trial at the Ontario Superior Court, 361 University Ave, Toronto, ON. It will be Monday, April 20th, 9:00 am

My so-called “hate crime” trial is slated to start May 25th and will run until June 12th, at the Ontario Superior Court which is in my University-Rosedale riding, 361 University Ave, Toronto, ON.

If you wish, you can certainly pray that I am the sitting Member of Parliament for University-Rosedale when I go on trial.

In Christ’s Service, Bill Whatcott

To support the Bill Whatcott election campaign and get a tax receipt (Canadian residents only): billwhatcott.2026@gmail.com

To support me while I go on trial a second time for “Wilful Promotion of Hatred”  (no tax receipt, just treasure in heaven, anyone can donate) go here:  https://www.lifefunder.com/whatcott/

I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. ” John 11:25,26

German MEP Christine Anderson Warns of Dangers of Digital ID

German MEP Christine Anderson is sounding a massive alarm: those “under-16 social media bans” aren’t about protecting kids, they are the gateway to a mandatory Digital ID for everyone. 🚨

“The EU wants to scan private messages sent from your phone,” Anderson warns. While officials claim it’s about stopping illegal content, she reveals the chilling reality, it means scanning everything you say.

The ultimate goal? Linking every single online move to a Digital ID. “That is called surveillance,” Anderson says. “And putting one’s own citizens under surveillance is the practice best known in totalitarian regimes.”

Are we trading our last shred of digital privacy for a false sense of security