The Justice Centre is sounding the alarm about the city’s new ‘Safe Access to Social Infrastructure Bylaw’, which would prevent individuals or groups from peacefully protesting near places of worship, schools, childcare centres, or healthcare facilities.
“Lawyers funded by the Justice Centre warn that the bylaw is overly broad and lacks meaningful safeguards, effectively enabling the creation of protest-free zones in public spaces,” a statement from the organization reads in part.
Kheir further discussed some of the more concerning aspects of the proposed bylaw and its potential impact on freedom of expression.
“Probably the most concerning thing is it prohibits demonstrations, which are defined as one or more people in a place primarily for the purpose of expressing an opinion. So it could just be a person holding a sign would be prohibited from 50 metres from the access point to the designated facility,” he said.
Kheir highlighted that facilities would only need to submit a simple application and attestation to establish these 50-metre safe access zones, raising concerns that the bylaw grants broad discretionary power with insufficient protections for Charter rights.
Hajo Herrmann (1913-2010) was an outstanding German Luftwaffe pilot who also distinguished himself during the Second World War as a courageous air force commander and innovative air defense tactician. After the war he built a new career as an attorney, and became known for his role in civil rights cases, defending patriots and so-called “Holocaust deniers” accused of violating German laws against free speech. Until his death at the age of 97, he remained steadfastly loyal to his people, his heritage, and the ideals of his youth.
After beginning his military career as an infantry officer, he was commissioned in the newly formed Luftwaffe in 1935. From 1936 until 1937, he was a bomber pilot in the Condor Legion, which aided the Nationalists in the Spanish civil war.
After the outbreak of war in Europe in 1939, he flew planes in the campaigns in Poland and Norway. By 1940 he was Commander of the 7th Staffel KG-4 combat squadron, and led many air attacks on England during the “Battle of Britain.” In February 1941, his group went to Sicily, where it flew against British forces in Malta and Greece. In one attack, Herrmann dropped a bomb on an ammunition ship that set off a explosion so devastating that it sank eleven ships and rendered the Greek port of Piraeus unusable for months. In early 1942, he was Commander of III/KG 30, which struck from Norway against Allied Arctic convoys, including attacks on convoy PQ-17
In mid-1942 he was assigned to the Luftwaffe Operational Staff, where he soon made a name for himself as a outstanding tactical and operational innovator in strengthening Germany’s air defenses.
In response to the ever more devastating attacks by British and American bombers, Herrmann created Luftwaffe night fighter attack squadron Jagdgeschwader 300, nicknamed Wilde Sau (German: wild boar), which used an innovative freelance fighter technique. Experienced night flying pilots and ex-instructors in Fw 190 fighters would visually “free-hunt” enemy bombers by the light of fires below, and with the aid of special ‘flare-carrier” Junkers JU 88 s following the bomber streams, as well as the use of the Naxos radar detector unit on some of these single-engined fighters to find British night bombers when they were using radar.
In December 1943, the 30-year-old Herrmann was appointed Inspector of Aerial Defense. By 1944, he was Inspector General of night fighters. At the end of 1944, he led the “9. Flieger-division (J).”
During the war, all Germans were targeted for death in a ruthless bombing effort that Allied authorities themselves called a terror campaign. More than half a million were killed, and many more were maimed or wounded. More than seven million were made homeless. Herrmann’s important role in strengthening his homeland’s air defenses helped to save the lives of many women, children and other civilians from horrific suffering and death.
As a bomber pilot, Herrmann flew 320 missions and sank twelve ships totaling 70,000 tons. He also flew more than 50 night fighter missions, destroying nine Allied bombers He was shot down four times, and wounded twice. For his valor and skill, he earned a number of decorations, including the Knight’s Cross with Oak Leaves and Swords, the German Cross in Gold, and the Iron Cross, first and second class.
At the end of the war Herrmann became a Soviet captive, and was held for ten years in Soviet Russian prison camps.
After returning to his homeland in 1955, he studied law and settled in Düsseldorf., where he worked as an attorney. He served as a civil rights lawyer in defending such “thought criminals” as Otto Ernst Remer, David Irving and Fred Leuchter, who were charged with violating German laws against free speech. In the case of Irving, Herrmann defended the British historian at no charge in three “thought crimes” trials, 1990-1993.
Herrmann was a friend of the Institute for Historical Review. On Nov. 8, 1998, he addressed an IHR meeting in southern California, where he provided fascinating details about his remarkable life, and insights into the climate of intellectual repression in Germany. On several occasions he sought help and advice from IHR director Mark Weber.
Herrmann was the author of two volumes of memoirs. An English-language edition of his memoirs was published in 1991 under the title Eagle’s Wings.
He remained active into the final years of his life, practicing law and addressing meetings.
Heritage is eliminating the Southern Poverty Law Center’s hate-filled influence in corporate America.
For years, the SPLC has smeared mainstream conservatives and conservative organizations as hateful bigots through their Hate Map.
Corporations then used the SPLC’s guidance to prevent employees from using employer matches to donate to conservative organizations—along with other woke corporate policies.
But that all changed when The Heritage Foundation began fighting back.
Through our Free Enterprise Initiative, we used the power of our endowment to file shareholder resolutions with major corporations to force them to disaffiliate from the Southern Poverty Law Center.
Thanks to our effective negotiations, Meta, Salesforce, and Mastercard have already agreed to stop using the SPLC’s diagnostic tools—including its Hate Map—across all aspects of their business, including charitable giving programs.
Additionally, we have pending shareholder proposals related to the SPLC at Amazon and Alphabet.
Heritage will not stop until all of corporate America recognizes the SPLC for what it is. Not a trustworthy source of information, but a radical, left-wing organization dedicated to defaming regular Americans who love our country.
Thank you for supporting this important work to take back our institutions.
Political Prisoner Bill Whatcott Discussed His Upcoming Re-trial on “Hate” Charges for Leafletting the 2016 Toronto Gay Pride Parade An enthusiastic crowd took this chance to hear and shake the hand of a Christian hero and free speech martyr. Thrifty Bill rode his bicycle half way across Toronto to the meeting. CAFE Director Paul Fromm introduced Mr. Whatcott.
Japan is drawing a clear line when it comes to creative freedom. Minister Kimi Onoda has stated that the country will not accept outside pressure to censor anime, a move that is already sparking strong reactions online.
For decades, anime has thrived as a unique form of storytelling, known for pushing boundaries, exploring complex themes, and reflecting Japanese culture without compromise.
Supporters see this stance as a powerful defense of artistic expression, while critics argue it could reignite global debates around content standards. One thing is certain: Japan is choosing to protect its creative identity, and the anime world is watching closely
I’d like to read the classic 1973 novel The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail. Despite my French surname, I speak no French other than oui and garbage, so I can’t read the original. At the same time, I’m not eager to spend one hundred dollars on an English translation.
But does it really matter? The book’s central premise — France being overwhelmed by waves of “migrant” invaders — has unfolded in real time across the West. These days, I can simply open Fox News to watch it happening.
This topic first caught my attention when a recent YouTube video by Mark Dice appeared in my recommendations. He was covering Amazon’s censorship of conservative books. Shortly afterward, I saw that Matt Walsh of The Daily Wire had also released a video on the same subject. Much as I enjoy Matt’s signature gruff delivery, I chose Mark’s version — it was shorter.
I learned that Amazon, which controls more than half of all book sales in the United States, temporarily removed the provocative novel from its platform last week before restoring it following widespread customer outrage. The Sudden Disappearance of The Camp of the Saints
The book in question depicts a fictional scenario in which a massive flotilla carrying roughly a million migrants from India and other parts of the Global South arrives on the shores of France, overwhelming the country’s institutions and cultural identity. Long labeled racist and inflammatory by woke critics suffering from moonbatopathy, the novel has been largely unavailable in affordable English editions for years. A small publisher, Valbin Books, recently produced a new, accessible translation and invested significant resources to bring it back into print.
After conservative commentators drew attention to the title, it quickly rose on Amazon’s bestseller charts and earned overwhelmingly positive customer reviews.
Then poof! It was scrubbed from the sacred pages of Amazon.
There was no warning or detailed explanation. The entire listing for the new edition just vanished. Shoppers saw only an error message. Older, out-of-print hardcover copies remained available—but often at prices exceeding $100. Gasp. The affordable version that had been gaining traction was effectively erased from the site.
The publisher reported that Amazon cited a violation of its “offensive content” policy. When pressed, Amazon later described the removal as a technical error. Many observers found the explanation unconvincing, especially given the timing: the delisting followed critical articles in French and American media that portrayed the book as influential among nationalist conservatives, otherwise called paleo-conservatives.
Double Standards in Content Policies
Critics pointed out that Amazon continues to sell Das Kapital, the holy scripture of Marxism, and numerous books promoting transgender ideology for children, including titles offering guidance on supporting a child’s gender transition. Supporters of the ban argued the novel crosses a line by presenting mass migration in unflattering terms. I fail to see the offense. The publisher, on the other hand — the right hand, countered that the story includes nuanced non-white characters and is primarily a warning about elite attitudes that could lead to demographic and cultural transformation, rather than a blanket condemnation of any ethnic group.
But wait. There’s more!
This segues (the only Spanish word I know besides si and adiós) to a broader pattern of past removals. Several years ago, Amazon pulled titles such as Ryan T. Anderson’s “When Harry Became Sally,” a critique of the transgender movement, which later returned after criticism from public figures including lawmakers. Other works by authors like Kevin MacDonald, David Duke, Jared Taylor, and Greg Johnson, along with historical texts such as Henry Ford’s “The International Jew” and Martin Luther’s writings on religious topics, were also removed around 2019–2020 and have not been restored on the main platform.
Retailers, including Barnes & Noble, have similarly restricted some of these titles. In contrast, books on unrelated sensitive subjects, including certain historical manuals, remain available through Amazon.
(My book, The Prayer of Hannah, is still available from third parties. It sold about 25,000 copies before the inventory was stolen from a warehouse.)
Alternative sources for some removed titles include direct publisher sites, used booksellers, or independent retailers like ThriftBooks and Books-A-Million, though availability varies and prices for out-of-print editions can be extravagant.
Sometimes I get things wrong. If you notice a significant error, please bring it to my attention in the comment section.
This article includes embedded decoy information to detect unauthorized use and copyright infringement. Reproduction is permitted only verbatim and in full, with all links preserved and attribution clearly given to DailyKenn.com and AbateHate.com.
Australia’s “Antisemitism Envoy” Makes It Clear That Israel’s Critics Are The Real TargetCAITLIN JOHNSTONEAPR 26READ IN APPReading by Tim Foley:Upgrade to paidAustralia’s “antisemitism envoy” Jillian Segal has published a handbookwhich unequivocally clarifies that her office exists not to protect Australian Jews from discrimination, but to stomp out criticism of the state of Israel.However bad you’re imagining it is, it’s worse. The handbook, set to be formally launched later this week under the title “Understanding Antisemitism in Australia,” explicitly conflates antisemitism and antizionism with statements like “Antisemitism and antizionism are both expressions of hatred towards Jews” and asserting that it is antisemitic to accuse Israel of “apartheid, oppression, racism and genocide.”It is therefore unambiguously the official position of the Australian government’s appointed authority on antisemitism that it is hateful and abusive toward Jews and their religion to oppose the racist political ideology underpinning the modern state of Israel.
Let’s go through the handbook together and highlight some revealing excerpts, shall we?The forward in the handbook stresses the importance of the Australian government’s endorsement of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism, which has been opposed around the world for its conflation of criticism of Israel with hateful actions toward Jews. Under the IHRA definition it is considered antisemitic to claim that Israel is a racist endeavor, or to compare Israel’s abuses to those of Nazi Germany — both of which are entirely legitimate criticisms which should be put forward far more often than they are. Much of the handbook follows from the premises of the IHRA definition.Segal’s office states that the handbook “is intended as a practical resource for schools, universities, public servants, community organisations and anyone seeking to understand antisemitism today.”
Segal’s office says that antisemitism “morphs” over the ages, from the blood libels and “Christ-killer” accusations of the Middle Ages to the racism of Nazi Germany, and has now morphed so that “antisemitic tropes are conveyed and justified in the language of human rights and international legal arguments.”“For example, sometimes Jews are labelled and libelled as ‘settler-colonialists’, ‘oppressors’, and a symbol of a global system of domination that ‘can seemingly accommodate even the murder of Jews as Jews’,” the envoy proclaims.Do you see how the subject was moved to lump medieval superstitions about Jews in with entirely legitimate criticisms of the modern state of Israel? According to Australia’s Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism, criticising Israel using “language of human rights and international legal arguments” is not meaningfully different from saying that Jews drink the blood of Christian children.This, clearly, is stark raving insanity.
“Legitimate criticism of Israel is not antisemitic,” the envoy concedes, then proceeds to completely negate this concession with everything that follows. “However, there are many examples of antisemitic imagery, tropes, conspiracy theories and propaganda (echoing medieval myths) that have found their way into anti-Israel discourse. It is also increasingly common for the word ‘Zionist’ (or iterations of it) to be used as cover or proxy for ‘Jew ’.”This is completely made up. The claim that critics of Israel’s abuses use the word “Zionist” when they really mean “Jew” is just something Israel apologists started asserting with no substantiation whatsoever a few years ago. They have no evidence for this assertion apart from the frequency and forcefulness which with they assert it.The envoy defines Zionism as “the belief that the Jewish people have the right to self-determination within their ancestral homeland,” which is misleading at best. That’s not what Zionism is. Zionism is what we see before us today. The genocide, apartheid, ethnic cleansing and nonstop war and abuse. That’s what Zionism is, as evidenced by material reality. The best definition of Zionism is its real-world manifestations. Zionism is what it looks like when you give the Zionists everything they want.
“A new variant of antisemitic atrocity denial emerged in the wake of the 7 October 2023 Hamas terrorist attacks — the deadliest day for Jewish people since the Holocaust,” the envoy writes. “Disturbingly, these atrocities have been met by some with denial, minimisation, justification and distortion — echoing Holocaust denial, minimisation, and distortion.”Segal’s office is here telling us that it is antisemitic to talk about the glaring plot holes in the narratives about mass rapes, beheaded babies and babies cooked in ovens on October 7, or to talk about the large number of Israelis who were killed by IDF fire under the Hannibal Directive, or to “justify” the attack by pointing out the monstrous Israeli abuses which gave rise to it.The envoy writes of the importance of “Standing firm against antisemitism parading as ‘anti-racism’,” stressing the IHRA position that framing Israel as a racist endeavor is hateful toward Jews. A flyer saying “We don’t want your two states. We want all of 48” is labeled “antisemitic, because there is only one Jewish country.”Segal’s office warns of the dangers of “Holocaust inversion,” which is when “Israel and Jews are portrayed as Nazi-like perpetrators of mass atrocities and genocide,” which is bad because it “serves to demonise and delegitimise Israel, Israelis and Jews.”To be clear, every relevant humanitarian institution on earth has said that Israel is guilty of genocide in Gaza. These groups include:1. The United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory2. The International Association of Genocide Scholars3. B’Tselem (an Israeli organization)4. Physicians for Human Rights-Israel (another Israeli organization)5. Amnesty International6. Doctors Without Borders7. The European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights8. Human Rights Watch9. The International Federation for Human Rights10. The Lemkin Institute for Genocide PreventionThe list of humanitarian institutions who say Israel is NOT committing genocide in Gaza includes:1. Nobody2. No one3. Zero4. Nothing5. Nada6. Zilch7. Sweet damn all8. A complete absence9. Diddly squat10. BupkisThis is not some fringe conspiracy theory. It is a thoroughly established and entirely indisputable fact. Australia’s Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism is saying that facts are antisemitic.Some examples cited in the handbook of glaring instances of the antisemitic crime of “Holocaust inversion”: — Placards of ‘ Well done Hitler would be proud’ and ‘Same shit Different asshole’, the latter with images of Hitler and Netanyahu, both placards making Nazi analogies to Israel. — Three banners of Hitler removing his mask , revealing the face of Netanyahu, making an analogy between Nazism and Israel, on major roads. — Graffiti of a Star of David, equal sign, and Nazi swastika , and another graffiti of ‘End the Genocide’ on a main road.We’re meant to believe it should be a hate crime to say the state that’s waging multiple wars of aggression while mass murdering people because of their ethnicity bears some resemblance to another state which did these things. I don’t know about you, but I find that silly.Australia’s “antisemitism envoy” claims it is antisemitic to say the IHRA definition of antisemitism silences criticism of Israel, arguing that “claims that the leading global definition of antisemitism — which reflects the lived experience of Jewish people worldwide — is designed to intentionally silence criticism echoes antisemitic tropes of Jewish power and control.”That’s right kids: you can’t criticise Israel because that’s antisemitic, and if you complain that your speech is being suppressed, that’s antisemitic too.The handbook includes a hypothetical office group chat with a coworker making the statement “But what about the genocidal, racist Zionist project that has oppressed the Palestinians? Zionism is a supremacist ideology invented by Theodore Herzl. They’ve done this through apartheid and ethnic cleansing.”“This is antisemitic,” the handbook argues, dismissing the entirely accurate statement as “Soviet-era antizionist propaganda” and saying it “was antisemitic because it included statements that accused Israel of apartheid, oppression, racism and genocide.”Saying it’s antisemitic to accuse Israel of apartheid, oppression, racism and genocide is as clear an admission that Segal’s goal is to stomp out all criticism of Israel as you could possibly ask for.If that wasn’t clear enough for you, the handbook concludes with the assertion that it is impossible to separate antizionism from antisemitism:“Trying to separate ‘antisemitism’ from ‘antizionism’ ignores the history of misinformation, disinformation and antisemitic propaganda that has shaped narratives about Israel and Zionism,” the envoy asserts. “It also ignores the lived and practical reality that wherever these antizionist narratives have been propagated, it has resulted in discrimination, harassment , vilification, hate and harm towards Jews. For example, Poland’s 1968 antizionist campaign resulted in expulsions and forced emigration of thousands of Jewish Poles.”“Antisemitism and antizionism are both expressions of hatred towards Jews,” the handbook concludes.So there you have it. That settles that.Caitlin Johnstone@caitozJillian Segal is a white South African who lobbies for an apartheid state and whose husband pays money to foment racism in Australia — and yet she was somehow chosen by the Labor government to help stomp out hate in this country.11:28 PM · Jul 13, 2025 · 29.6K Views57 Replies · 691 Reposts · 2.11K LikesThroughout the handbook, the feelings of Australian Jews are cited over and over again as supremely important and of far more urgent a concern than genocide, apartheid, ethnic cleansing, and wars of immense geopolitical consequence.“Feel more isolated… I feel like I am living the life of a Jew from history, rather than the Jew I was 2 years ago,” reads a quote from an unnamed Jewish person.“I just feel so sad that I need to educate my children in how to respond if they are screamed at in the street,” reads another.“The silence from friends I have known almost all my life, the constant posting of antisemitic slurs and the public broadcasts of factually incorrect reports has been devastating and makes me fearful of what might happen next. Since October 7, when I speak to someone who hasn’t offered any support, I often ask myself ‘would they hide me’ which is a terribly sad situation in our beautiful country where I have always felt safe,” reads another.“A tutor in my university class made antisemitic comments very casually which made me feel extremely uncomfortable and unsafe. I am now nervous when entering a uni class,” reads another.“Being confronted again and again with blind hate towards my people and the place I come from was very painful. It impacted my mood, the way I perceived my community and my place in it, and my daily function,” reads another.Virtually nothing is said about the real victims. The murdered, displaced and terrorized targets of Israeli atrocities in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Iran. The war orphans. The child amputees and burn victims who were operated on without anesthesia. The Palestinians being raped and tortured in Israeli prisons. The people who will carry the physical and psychological wounds from their holocaust with them for the rest of their lives.They are not regarded as important by Jillian Segal. The real crisis, in her mind, is people talking about these things and making Jewish Australians feel upset.Absolutely psychotic. We cannot allow our country to continue to be dragged in this direction._________________
We want to show a sneering world of enemies, envious people, and haters, clearly and unequivocally, that although they can militarily defeat us Germans, occupy us with foreign troops, infiltrate us with spies, rule us with traitors, lie to us by a foreign-controlled licensed press, and even shame us; that they can persecute and enslave us through a perverted political justice system and a police force prone to arbitrary acts, these criminals against Germany’s destiny will never defeat us. ~Ernst Zündel
