Stop Worrying About War in Venezuela: Carney Is Making War on Free Speech In Canada
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzQfBGhDmQVRdHmfpMdHkMfWcHJG?projector=1
Jewish Lobby Group Brags It Got Saskatoon Man Charged For Internet Hate
Jewish Lobby Group Brags It Got Saskatoon Man Charged For Internet Hate
[You’d think with all the complaints by the Jewish lobby about growing “anti-semitism” in Canada, Jewish lobby groups might be a little more cautious about throwing their weight around. But, no they boast of scouring the Internet to try to silence those who criticize Jews (“anti-Semitism.) ““Moore’s virulent antisemitism has no place in Canadian society,” said Richard Robertson, director of research and advocacy for B’nai Brith Canada. ““B’nai Brith Canada will continue to document, report, and pursue every available legal avenue to protect Jewish Canadians and to ensure justice,” said Robertson.” That is to shield Jews from strong criticism which was always one of the main reasons for Canada’s notorious “hate law” (now Sec. 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code) enacted after decades of Jewish lobby pressure. It never was about hate (whatever that is) The Supreme Court came clen in the Whatcott decision 2012) Whites and Christians are not protected from hate because they are not vulnerable minorities. Not “vulnerable minorities” but privileged minorities!]
Saskatoon man makes first court appearance on hate crime charge
Brandon Moore, 45, is accused of making anti-Semitic comments online.
Lisa JoyDec 18, 2025 4:04 PM
SASKATOON — A Saskatoon man facing a hate crime charge made his first appearance in Saskatoon Provincial Court on Dec. 18. He is accused of making anti-Semitic comments online.
Brandon Moore, 45, is now scheduled to appear in court on Jan. 13, 2026, to enter an election. He isn’t in custody.
Moore is charged with public incitement of hatred and unsafe storage of a firearm. SPS say their investigation started in 2024 after they received a complaint about someone making anti-Semitic comments online. They say they identified the suspect and executed a search warrant at a Saskatoon home, that resulted in the seizure of digital evidence as well as a firearm.
In a media release Thursday, the B’nai Brith Canada Advocacy said the arrest was a result of their advocacy.
“Moore’s virulent antisemitism has no place in Canadian society,” said Richard Robertson, director of research and advocacy for B’nai Brith Canada. “We applaud the Saskatoon Police Service (SPS) for investigating…and taking action to protect the Jewish community and all Canadians.”
B’nai Brith Canada said they had grown increasingly concerned about Moore’s conduct online. They said this led them to file several complaints with the SPS.
“B’nai Brith Canada will continue to document, report, and pursue every available legal avenue to protect Jewish Canadians and to ensure justice,” said Robertson.
The charges against Moore haven’t been proven in court. (Saskatoon Today, December 18, 2025)
Canada’s Digital Guillotine: How Your Words Are About to Be Policed
“Street-Level Warning” for Canadians living under this legislation.
Canada’s Digital Guillotine: How Your Words Are About to Be Policed
The first Monday of 2026 has come and gone, and Ottawa is already sending a clear message: your voice online is no longer yours.
Prime Minister Mark Carney and his Liberals are moving faster than most Canadians realize, reviving the Online Harms Act, the same bill that died last year, but now armed with even bigger budgets, bigger bureaucracies, and bigger ambitions.
This is not about child safety. That’s the story they tell to make it seem harmless. The truth is far darker. This law gives a government commission the power to decide what is “harmful” and what isn’t. It gives platforms the choice to remove anything that might offend regulators or risk fines. In practice, this means anything you post, share, or even joke about could vanish. Your opinion, your commentary, your criticism, your religion, your art, all under the shadow of a $200 million bureaucracy designed to watch, judge, and silence.
It doesn’t matter if you’re careful, if you follow the rules, if you never break a law. This law is vague on purpose. It’s not meant to catch criminals. It’s meant to catch thinkers, questioners, people who challenge the narrative, people who refuse to stay silent. Ordinary Canadians like you and me could be flagged simply for sharing something a bureaucrat doesn’t like. A political cartoon could disappear. A video questioning government policy could be taken down. Even a private discussion could be scrutinized.
And the platforms will comply, because the fines are massive, and the government isn’t joking. They want control, and the easiest way to get it is to make everyone self-censor.
You post, you hesitate, you delete before anyone sees it, just to be safe. That’s the plan. That’s the real effect. This is how freedom dies quietly, without headlines, without drama, with people convinced they are just “being careful.”
Carney’s government is fast-tracking this. They are not waiting, not debating, not listening to the alarm bells that have been ringing since the first iteration of this bill in 2024. Consultations have been quiet, conversations behind closed doors, decisions made in rooms Canadians cannot enter.
The machinery is being built now, the rules written in shadow, the system designed to sweep every word, every post, every thought under the watchful eye of the state.
And make no mistake, this is just the beginning. The law is part of a larger plan. Expanded surveillance powers, AI monitoring, digital oversight, platforms acting as extensions of government judgment, it is all connected. Canada is on the edge of a digital panopticon, where the things you say, think, and share are never private, never safe, and never yours alone.
The first Monday of 2026 is more than a date. It’s a warning. The government is ready to take action, and if Canadians do not act, we will wake up one day in a country where free expression is conditional, where speaking out is risky, where silence is survival. This is the Canada Carney is building. Watch your words. Question everything my friends. Share this everywhere. If you do not, you may find your voice erased, and the freedoms you took for granted gone forever. This is not joke.
Step-by-Step Descent Since 2024
Feb 26, 2024: Bill C‑63 introduced. Digital Safety Commission and platform duties proposed. Public warned of chilling effects.
2024: Parliamentary debate; critics cry foul over vague definitions and administrative censorship.
Dec 4, 2024: Bill split into “child safety” and “broader harms” components, a tactical move to push through censorship.
Jan 6, 2025: Parliament prorogued, Bill dies. Liberals quietly vow to return.
2025: Behind-the-scenes consultations hint at regulating AI, deepfakes, political speech, and religious commentary.
Early 2026: Signals show Carney’s Liberals pushing full throttle to reintroduce the bill, with $200M+ bureaucracy poised to monitor, flag, and erase online content.
The Chilling Effect
Imagine a Canada where:
Your opinion can be removed instantly, judged by unelected bureaucrats.
Political criticism is censored before it reaches an audience.
Religious beliefs are monitored, flagged, and potentially suppressed.
Platforms remove lawful content preemptively to avoid fines, meaning your voice disappears because corporations are too afraid to defend it.
This isn’t dystopian fiction. The UK’s Online Safety regime shows how quickly regulation can criminalize digital expression, and Canada is now following the same path, only faster, under Carney.
CAFE PROTESTS BILLS C-8 & C-9
CAFE OPPOSES BILLS C-8 & C-9
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RGjKuqoWagsb
The Midnight Man, [1/5/2026 1:20 AM]
“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.”
John Diefenbaker
Well, not any more. If you dissent, our wretched leadership and powerful minorities want to shut you up
I’ve seen the Canada of my youth that cherished free speech become a crabbed, mean cancel culture, now contemplating even greater restrictions. So, on my birthday I braved bitter cold to lead about 15 CAFE associates to join a rally at Hamilton City Hall to oppose the Liberals’ latest forays into thought control on the Internet. [I fly the Red Ensign the flag of the REAL Canada.]
CAFE supporters contributed the bulk of the 30 people who gathered at Hamilton City Hall to oppose the police state censorship bills C-8 AND C-9.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RGjKuqoWagsb
OP-ED: What loyalty really means in Canada’s time of moral confusion
OP-ED: What loyalty really means in Canada’s time of moral confusion
“In recent years, loyalty has become a suspicious word in Canadian public life. To express attachment to one’s culture, values, or historical narrative is increasingly treated as a moral flaw.”
Author: Dotan Rousso
In recent years, loyalty has become a suspicious word in Canadian public life. To express attachment to one’s culture, values, or historical narrative is increasingly treated as a moral flaw rather than a virtue. We are often told that strong identification with a group signals exclusion or prejudice, as if rootedness itself were a barrier to be overcome. This view is mistaken. It misunderstands something fundamental about what it means to be human.
From an evolutionary perspective, loyalty was never optional. For most of human history, survival depended on belonging to a group and remaining faithful to it. Shared norms, mutual obligation, and collective memory were not abstract ideals; they were the conditions of survival. Group loyalty was not a moral excess; it was the mechanism through which individuals lived. That reality did not disappear with the advent of modern liberal democracies. Identity does not emerge in a vacuum. Language, moral instincts, and traditions are inherited before they are chosen. Acknowledging this does not undermine pluralism; it explains how a stable society becomes possible in the first place.
Yet in times of moral confusion, this basic truth is inverted. Under the banner of progressiveness, Canadians are encouraged to treat strong cultural attachment as morally suspect. Commitment is confused with intolerance, and loyalty is portrayed as a refusal to accept others. This framing is false, and its impact is not merely academic. We see it in the hushed debates over municipal holiday displays and the quiet removal of historical figures from the public square. When we scrub the “particular” to make room for the “universal,” we aren’t creating a more inclusive space; we are creating an empty one. We are asking Canadians to stand on a foundation of air.
Consider the irony of Remembrance Day. On this day, Canadians are encouraged to honor sacrifice, continuity, and national memory as unifying virtues. These rituals are widely understood as dignified. Yet, when similar language of loyalty appears outside officially sanctioned contexts, it is often treated with suspicion. The same society that honors collective memory in one setting condemns it in another. This inconsistency reveals not openness, but a deep confusion about the moral legitimacy of belonging itself.
It is entirely possible to respect others and recognize their legitimacy while remaining deeply committed to one’s own identity. Valuing what is “ours” does not require denying value to “theirs.” These positions are not contradictory; they coexist naturally in any healthy society. A culture that demands people abandon their deepest sources of meaning in the name of openness does not produce moral clarity. It produces fragility and resentment.
Loyalty, properly understood, is a moral commitment. It means holding certain values and traditions as worthy of protection. If a group’s identity is challenged by ideologies that seek to erase or delegitimize it, there is nothing un-Canadian about naming that threat and resisting it. Refusing to do so is not tolerance; it is abdication. To stand firm in one’s identity without apology is an act of responsibility. It means protecting what gives life coherence without pretending that all values are interchangeable.
As many Canadians mark Christmas, this is a moment to reconsider loyalty not as exclusion, but as rootedness. In an age that treats belonging as a liability, we must remember that it remains a foundation of human dignity and the bedrock of a confident, pluralistic Canada.
For comments: dotanrousso@yahoo.com
MARTYN: No apologies. Canada was built, not stolen
MARTYN: No apologies. Canada was built, not stolen
If Canada is ‘stolen,’ then so is every inch humanity has ever walked.
A Canadian flagWS file photo
Western Standard Guest Columnist
Published on:
29 Dec 2025, 9:30 am
Kurtis Martyn works in the construction industry in Calgary.
I am Canadian, born in an icy metropolis where the winters are worse than a bad hangover and the summers tease you with false promises. I have the proof of my travels, stamped with poutine grease and hockey bruises. But recently, this country has become a therapy session that has gone wrong, where every flag wave comes with an apology.
“Stolen land,” is the war cry, like a chant for the forever offended. I do not agree. Canada was not stolen. It was made. It was hammered together from treaties, sweat, and, yes, some ugly parts that history likes to turn into villainy tales. And if that makes me the jerk at the party, then so be it.
Humans didn’t grow out of the tundra like weeds. All of us have come here. Indigenous people came across from Asia 15,000 to 20,000 years ago, hunting mammoths and looking for better weather, just as the Europeans later went for beaver pelts and empire dreams. It’s the never-ending shuffle of humanity; conquer, adapt, or die. No one has clean hands in that game. The Iroquois and Huron were enemies long before Columbus got lost. Small-scale wars, of course, but wars nevertheless, land passing from one hand to another through blood and bargains.
After that, the Crown came not with fire and brimstone, but with ink and promises. More than 70 treaties. Just the Numbered Treaties from 1871 to 1923 alone covered areas larger than your ego after three Tim Hortons double doubles. Land given in exchange for reserves, annuities, and hunting rights.
Very legal according to the laws of that time. In BC, where the plot is the hottest, only 7% of the land is treaty land, but what about the rest? They were considered Crown lands when they joined Confederation in 1871, alliances, purchases, very few direct confrontations.
However, the critics shout, “Coercion! Starvation! Disease!” Yes, of course. Buffalo herds were annihilated, populations were wiped out by smallpox and bad deals. The Indian Act of 1876 was a breakup act; it banned rituals, forced people to live on reserves while settlers built railroads and cities. Residential schools? A national wound; the death rate was higher than the trenches of World War I. I’m not here to whitewash the rot.
It’s the kind of institutional crap that needs to be ripped open and exposed, but labeling it all as “theft” is a sign of laziness, like blaming your ex for every bad thing since. Treaties were done, under pressure, of course, but they were done. Oral promises broken? Definitely. But here we are, investing $32 billion yearly in programs for the indigenous people, which is three times the amount in 2014. That is 882% growth per person since 1947, way ahead of the rest of us.
Reforms in child welfare under Bill C92, fixing the water, $10 billion in loan guarantees for energy projects. Is it money soaked in blood? Perhaps. But it is reciprocity at work, giving back those dusty treaty vouchers while the rest of us are paying taxes and pretending to be saints.
The fight in BC is more painful than the wait in a Canadian hospital. Tara Armstrong’s slogan, “Canada was built not stolen”, is very impactful; it has 1.2 million views. OneBC party is urging petitions to do away with Truth and Reconciliation Day, calling out Premier Eby’s UNDRIP actions that may give veto powers over pipelines and mines. Critics deny the allegations and refer to unceded lands and genocide. They have got their facts right; 95% of BC is under claims according to the recent Cowichan decision. However, vetoes? That is not fairness; it is the breaking up of territories like a bad divorce.
A 2025 Leger poll shows that 52% of the people do not believe in the “stolen land” narrative. Is it a generational thing? Of course, the children are more woke, but the older Canadians remember the times when this country was built out of the wild and made into a welfare state.
So, why all the guilt? It is today’s confessional, where admitting “theft” saves you from actually fixing things. Canada’s no heist movie. It was forged in the muck of migration, treaties twisted by power, and now, billions in make-goods. We built it, railroads over bones, cities from forests, a social net that catches more than it drops. Own the ugly parts, but ditch the stolen myth. It’s time to build forward, not kneel in the past. Because if everything’s stolen, nothing’s worth saving. And forget that, I’m Canadian. Pass the beer.
Kurtis Martyn works in the construction industry in Calgary.
Washington State AG Warns Citizen Journalists To Stop Investigating Somali Daycares Or Face Potential Hate Crime Charges
Washington State AG Warns Citizen Journalists To Stop Investigating Somali Daycares Or Face Potential Hate Crime Charges
by Tyler Durden
Thursday, Jan 01, 2026 – 12:50 PM
Authored by Debra Heine via American Greatness,
The Washington state attorney general released a statement on X Tuesday evening warning independent journalists to stop investigating fraudulent Somali daycare centers or they could be charged with a hate crime.
“My office has received outreach from members of the Somali community after reports of home-based daycare providers being harassed and accused of fraud with little to no fact-checking,” State AG Nick Brown stated.
“We are in touch with the state Department of Children, Youth, and Families regarding the claims being pushed online and the harassment reported by daycare providers. Showing up on someone’s porch, threatening, or harassing them isn’t an investigation. Neither is filming minors who may be in the home. This is unsafe and potentially dangerous behavior.”
Harmeet Dhillon, the Assistant Attorney General for Civil rights, issued a warning of her own in reaction to the Washington state AG’s post.
“ANY state official who chills or threatens to chill a journalist’s 1A rights will have some ‘splainin to do,” she wrote on X, Wednesday morning.
“[The DOJ Civil Rights Division] takes potential violations of 18 USC § 242 seriously!” Dhillon added.
This statute, known as the Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, makes it a crime for any person acting under the pretense of law to willfully deprive another individual of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
The clash of the AGs came after Youtuber Nick Shirley exposed about a dozen Somali-owned, state-funded childcare facilities in Minneapolis, Minnesota, that appeared to be completely deserted.
Shirley produced a 42-minute video, which has been viewed over 131 million times on X since it was posted on December 26, alleging that Minnesota governor Tim Walz (D.) “knew about the fraud but never reported it.”
Inspired by Shirley’s bombshell report, citizen journalists in multiple states with large Somali populations have launched their own investigations in recent days.
In the Kent, Washington area Tuesday, YouTuber Chris Sims, a self-described “gonzo journalist,” visited seven suspicious Somali childcare sites and reported that they were “very unhappy” to see him.
Sims posted a video of him approaching a private home listed as a childcare facility that appeared to be not as advertised.
“There was no sign of kids or being a Daycare facility,” Sims wrote.
“I was told by a few they weren’t Daycares despite receiving tax payer dollars. One yelled ‘Call the police’ behind the door.”
On Monday, independent journalists Jonathan Choe and Cam Higby visited an alleged Somali daycare facility in Seattle that receives hundreds of thousands in taxpayers funds and the person who answered the door said there was no daycare there in the past or present.
Higby said “Dhagash Childcare” has received over $210,000 just this year alone.
Another listed childcare facility, a house in a residential neighborhood in Kent, Washington, has received over $863,000 since 2023, according to Higby.
“Residents say there IS NO DAYCARE HERE,” the journalist said.
Another reporter reporting on potential fraud in the Rainier Vista neighborhood of Seattle on December 29th, faced hostile reactions from the Somali residents, who called the police on him.
In his statement, the Washington State AG encouraged members of the Somali community “experiencing threats or harassment” to call the police or his office’s Hate Crimes & Bias Incident Hotline or report it to the state’s hate crime website.
Addressing the independent journalists, Brown added: “If you think fraud is happening, there are appropriate measures to report and investigate. Go to DCYF’s website to learn more. And where fraud is substantiated and verified by law enforcement and regulatory agencies, people should be held accountable.”
The Post Millennial’s Andy Ngo responded to Brown’s threat on X, saying: “It is the duty of journalists to visit taxpayer-funded nonprofits and businesses to investigate where you have failed. The journalists have documented their visits on camera and there is no harassing or threatening behavior. You are trying to threaten journalists by telling people to call police with false allegations of a hate crime.”
Parroting Plagiarizing, the Artificial Intelligence Plundering
Dec 26, 2025
What better way than to destroy one’s mind by giving up thought, curiosity, self awareness and creativity, than to delve into the plundering by Artificial Intelligence, AI.. When we look at whom created AI, and consider the nefarious nature of something programmed by a system intended to destroy humanity from the inside out, we only have to look at all the other historical “tools” presented to make our lives “easier”, more efficient, and therefore supposedly giving us more time. Time for what, I ask? To use AI, to learn about the rewritten history, theories, philosophies, so-called “values”, and priorities that technocracy uses to plunder societies?
With each “tool” we lose more of our connection to ourselves, to Nature, to our very roots, and specifically to our ancestral beginnings. According to world scholar, John Lamb Lash, author of NOT IN HIS IMAGE, the definitive book on the Gnostics, “The Gnostics identified the root of evil on this planet– rooting out transhumanism, the madness of AI and technocracy.” John Lamb Lash considers those using AI “to be such lazy asses as to give AI to think for you” when in fact, he says, “AI is a shit test.” And those who do not understand this term, please do your own research, without AI answering what you fundamentally must learn from within.
A fine interview by Lucas on Age of Truth with John Lamb Lash in 2023*, gives criticism of AI’s inability to ponder and consider, which is the very reason I write about AI today. When we give up or never claim our sovereignty to delve into the mysteries of living, of thinking, of experiencing, of creating, of beauty, we do not fully live. John claims that “the human spirit longs and hungers to express its creativity– that you do it as a sovereign act because you have it in you.” Why else might we be deterred to create from within our own mind? A lack of self confidence, a lack of self love, John speculates, or perhaps circumstances, obstacles, keeping us from creating.
I look at Substack writers who claim knowledge, but obviously use AI for their writing, not only to create the very structure of their writings, but the premise, the substance, and the conclusions. They ultimately attach their own personal identitifcation to their robotic essays. These publications were once left to scholars like John Lamb Lash, Henri Troyat, and master writers like Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Alexander Pushkin, Leo Tolstoy, Ezra Pound, T.S. Eliot, and many others who lived and breathed through their own hearts and souls.
Perhaps the most glaring of these assaults upon everyone exposed to these false productions used by Substack so-called “writers” is their omission citing AI as their source. This plagiarizing gives a false sense to the reader, that this writer, whether it is Falken, Medicine Girl, or Agent, researched, created, produced and ultimately synthesized historical information from revisionist history and source documents, rather than AI’s single mouthpiece, designed, artificially synthesized and intended to misdirect their readership whose hunger for truth is fed with AI fiction.
When Substack writers use AI, it becomes clear. The depth into which they delve, their opinions, self-assured and pointed, always away from the ancestral markings, and against the truth which becomes hijacked by those in power, whether it be the monarchy in Ancient Rome, the Bolsheviks fomenting their revolution against the Russian dynasty, Karl Marx and his singular stab at individuality, freedom, the existence of Soul, and fundamentally, Creation itself.
The paradigm ruling today at the fingers of the Rockefeller, Rothschild, Warburg bankers and politicians, media and educational institutions, not to speak of the allopathic dynasty directing the outcome of quality of life for those using its methods, rule with money, power and control. Their greatest “tools” unleashed upon societies include usury, central banking, credit cards, loans, microwave ovens, cellphones, wifi, 5 G, GMOs, estrogenic herbicides and pesticides, addictive substances, and the “innocuous” marijuana claimed to not be addictive, but systematically dulling ambition, clouding purpose, diminishing incentive and resulting in mens’ inability to achieve their raison d’etre and fulfill their responsibilitiy to family and society.
A recent article on homeopathy, a 200 year old modality, gentle, healing, and available to everyone, trashed homeopathy by Substack writer, Medicine Girl. Her opening two paragraphs expressed her sentiments and lack of knowledge, then she surrendered her diatribe to AI which assaulted this wondrously fine system German doctor, Samuel Hahnemann discovered and brought forward to the world in the late 1700s. A method of healing that uses the energy of substances to resonnate with our own body’s energy, to bring healing resolution and homeostasis. A healing modailty that does not harm, and is in alignment with the ethical Hippocratic oath, nearly 2,500 years old. And yet, this oath is violated, daily by conventional medicine whose use of the Rockefeller big pharma drugs, radical surgeries and unnecessary amputations of body parts, claim lives, quality of living using fear to prod people into harm’s way.
Why would anyone who presents themselves as “wholistic,” trash homeopathy, I ask myself? Only controlled opposition uses such a posture, or someone who is not fully self aware, unable to distinguish between truth and lies. Someone who is confused, overwhelmed by the depth and complexity of words that when used as grimoire, confuse and obfuscate truth and the real meaning behind the statements. Vladimir Lenin was known to claim that confusing the meaning of words, you confuse the mind. I suspect someone will one day post that “using AI to confuse the meaning of truth, you ultimately confuse societies, remove all sense of right and wrong and individuals’ abilities to parse out truth from fiction.” Hmmmmm.
But then, AI is fiction, according to John Lamb Lash. And bingo. No wonder it holds that allure for its users. Anything goes, no need for footnotes, no need for references of any sort, no need for quotation marks, there are no checks and balances, no accountability what-so-ever. Everything is made up and everything has a place on the stage in the theatre of actors and acting.
When I read Falken’s extensive writing on the Gnostics, claiming that they were “antagonistic to Nature,” I was shocked and stupified. If ever a society embraced and held sacred, Nature, it was the Gnostics. But when Falken so-called “claimed” that they struck out at the Christians, I knew he was reading the lies AI presents to anyone unaware of true history. Controlled opposition speaks truths, seduces us, our egos, our minds, to read and listen more to what they have to present. And then, in the midst of their claims, they drop their bombs, their lies, their harmful statements that eschew truth, while our own discernment has been disassembled and led asunder by AI drivel. No reference in Falken’s writing that AI led his production which he posted as his, and his alone. But do read the exchanges we had on his Substack on this writing. It is like wasabe up the nostrils to expose yet another fake who writes under the ghostwriter’s invisibility. Layer upon layer of false identity. Authenticity lacks, and when authenticity lacks, so does truth. Including integrity–and the honour, and our connection to our ancestors with whom we owe our lives today. Falken claims to be speaking truth, hides behind a moniker, uses AI for his writings, claiming a knowledge he most certainly lacks and leaves his readers to think that he knew this stuff and is bringing it forward because we want to know, too.
The breadth of writing by Substack writer, Agent swooned me. And on issues as critical as vitamins and supplementation, information of which I am well read. But his level of so-called “knowledge,” the depth of his “research” gave him in my mind, superiority over all I had read because of the depth and detail and certainty woven into all the material. Over the many months, seeing the copious postings on his Substack, then reading the abominable castration of homeopathy by Medicine Girl, and noting their referencing one another in their writings, I recognized the patterning of the “speak” of their prolific AI writing. Agent, perhaps hides his use of AI better than Medicine Girl and Falken, but prove me incorrect that all three could not produce without AI. My intuitive knowing has plucked these impersonators out of the waters. Let them write, let them speak, but please, let them use their own minds, to bring forth their own ideas, their perspectives and research, but not more of the AI god of technocracy, the communist “one mind” with which Karl Marx and Frederich Engels created to curse the world.
Truly, John Lamb Lash’s statement, that folks who use AI are, “lazy asses,” proves itself time and again. Holds a light to show us that reality, that our very connection to the Natural world, is bypassed, over-ridden, extinguished, and surplanted by the shit test–AI fiction. Anyone claiming that AI has a place in their life has already sold their soul to the technocracy that twists, rewrites all that is real, natural and truthful. AI is the fictional character no differently than what the corporate tribunals and their banks impose upon humanity. The Gnostic teachings expose the strawman argument, the revisionist history books expose the truth, and source documents give us the very words and perspectives of those of that day. Truth is the greatest threat to evil, to lies, to those who hide in the shadows. The resonance of our energy, of light, against dark. Let truth be our guide, not the fiction of AI.
*
https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Qmz5RFrsucM?rel=0&autoplay=0&showinfo=0&enablejsapi=0
JOHN LAMB LASH ~ “A.I. vs. Hate ~ The Illusion Of Compassion – The Game Changer” [Age Of Truth TV]
Donations to this Substack can be made to:
Paypal.me/Kathleendudley1 Thank you. Kathleen Dudley
Update from Italian Political Prisoner Joe Fallisi (en francais and in English)
Ostuni, le 26 décembre 2025
Chers amis, merci infiniment, avant tout, pour votre solidarité, qui a été pour moi comme un rayon de soleil dans les ténèbres.Hier seulement, après des mois d’attente, j’ai réussi à récupérer mon compte Gmail et enfin tous mes e-mails, listes de diffusion, etc. – un cadeau du Soleil Invincible. Je suis fatigué et épuisé, non pas tant par mon malheur, qui, comparé à une seule journée de souffrance endurée par les martyrs et les héros palestiniens pendant deux ans, est insignifiant, mais plutôt par les pertes personnelles et collectives qui l’ont accompagné. Ainsi, plus nous vieillissons, plus notre arbre perd ses feuilles, approchant du grand hiver. Et toutes ces feuilles sont désormais pour moi des branches entières, des parties vitales qui disparaissent irrémédiablement. D’abord la mort, qui m’a frappé comme un coup de tonnerre, de John Kaminski, puis celle de Gian Paolo Pucciarelli, puis celle de Guillaume Nichols, tous trois de vrais amis, auxquels j’étais très attaché… et la douloureuse rupture avec Michèle Renouf… enfin, le départ de mon cher Rexbel pour le paradis des chiens. Et avec cela, la monstrueuse catastrophe que les Juifs, avec l’approbation et l’aide de la foule complice de leurs Shabbos goyim, ont provoquée et continuent d’infliger à la Palestine, à la Syrie, au Yémen, au Liban… Ce qui se passe et le silence lâche de mes concitoyens me laissent sans voix. Mais voici mon histoire personnelle, car je vous la dois depuis longtemps :
4 décembre 2024, 6 h 00. On frappe violemment à la porte. Une douzaine d’agents de la DIGOS (notre mini-NKVD, au service de l’internationale de Shylock) font irruption. Leur chef m’informe qu’ils doivent procéder, sur ordre du parquet de Bologne, à la perquisition de l’appartement et me demande si j’ai un avocat ou s’ils doivent m’en désigner un d’office. Je pense à Angelo Cerasino (dont je sais que certains d’entre vous ont déjà pris contact), un excellent avocat, en droit civil comme en droit pénal, et l’un de mes rares amis sincères ici à Ostuni. J’essaie donc de l’appeler (à cette heure-là !)… Il répond et accepte immédiatement. La perquisition commence et on me remet l’énorme dossier d’enquête. Pendant qu’ils mettent tout sens dessus dessous et que Vitalma, ma fidèle compagne, se comporte comme un vrai Lion, je m’assieds et commence à lire.
Je n’en crois pas mes yeux et je me pince presque pour savoir si c’est réel ou si je suis encore en train de rêver. La juge et la procureure, toutes deux des femmes, du tribunal de Bologne, m’accusent d’appartenir, en tant qu’« idéologue », à une « organisation terroriste » qui aurait prétendument planifié l’assassinat de notre (malheureusement) actuelle Première ministre itaGlienne, Giorgia Meloni, fervente partisane de Trump et ultra-sioniste (!). Je suis abasourdie et j’ai presque envie de rire, car, évidemment, je n’y connais rien. En fait, plus je lis, plus je réalise qu’ils m’ont habilement piégé, en tant que « mauvais professeur », dans une histoire (plus ou moins risible) qui m’était totalement étrangère, simplement parce que j’avais accordé une interview (et je maintiens mes propos mot pour mot) à l’excellent périodique en ligne « Ardire », et que j’avais participé à des discussions Telegram en y partageant mes écrits théorico-historiques sur le révisionnisme et la question juive, ainsi que des contre-informations quotidiennes et opportunes concernant le génocide en cours des Palestiniens par les abominables meurtriers et ignobles tortionnaires Juifs. S’ils m’avaient poursuivi uniquement pour ces « délits de pensée », j’aurais été inculpé, mais libre et sans aucune attention médiatique. Au lieu de cela, en me plaçant dans ce piège, ils ont pu m’incarcérer après un “blitz” et donner carte blanche aux vautours de la presse. Ténor, anarchiste (ou ex-anarchiste), auteur de « La Ballade de Pinelli », pro-palestinien, 76 ans… « nazi », « négationniste », « antisémite »… dans le talon de l’Italie, écrivaient-ils !… quel morceau succulent pour de tels œsophages (eux et leurs lecteurs) !
Ils veulent (on imagine aisément surtout qui) me punir pour mes idées et mon engagement pour la justice en Palestine. Et le fait que cela soit orchestré par le bras judiciaire« de gauche », d’un gouvernement « de droite » complaisant envers Israël est encore plus significatif. Le cercle vicieux est fermé. Le grand paradoxe, en réalité, est que dans kosherhamburgerland, ce pays totalement soumis au lobby pro-israélien, je ne serais probablement même pas… inquiété pour mes opinions « incorrectes » ! Et ce, grâce au Premier Amendement de la Constitution américaine, longtemps, mais jusqu’ici sans succès, la cible des Juifs… tout comme le droit des citoyens américains de posséder des armes à domicile – un peuple qui peut (pourrait) penser et s’exprimer librement… et, qui plus est, armé… peut-être contre ses propres tyrans !… Quelle horreur !
Je vous renvoie à un message sur « Libertari » (qui, soit dit en passant, est de retour, pleinement fonctionnel et intact sur Band, qui s’est enrichi d’un autre groupe de qualité, « Undicesimo Toro », https://www.band.us/band/96714422/post) où vous trouverez divers détails sur mon aventure et ses conséquences jusqu’à présent :
AVANTI, SEMPRE!, https://band.us/band/84909813/post/15202.
J’espère que vous n’avez jamais soupçonné que j’oublierais le Prix International Robert Faurisson. Si, cette année, pour des raisons tout à fait imprévues, il n’a pas pu avoir lieu (bien que je sache que des amis italiens s’y sont rendus le 25 janvier pour déposer des fleurs sur la tombe du professeur), la septième édition du Prix se tiendra dans moins d’un mois, le jour de l’anniversaire de Robert, et selon le format habituel.
Alors, à vous tous qui pouvez venir et participer, je vous invite à me rejoindre à 11h00 à l’endroit habituel. Après Ursula Haverbeck (2019), Vincent Reynouard (2020), Wolfgang Fröhlich (2021), Monika Schaefer et son frère Alfred (2022), Germar Rudolf (2023) et Arthur Butz (2024), nous aurons une fois de plus le plaisir de remettre le Prix Robert Faurisson à qui le mérite véritablement.
J’aime à penser que c’est le Professeur lui-même qui a accueilli le fidèle, intelligent et intègre Guillaume aux portes dorées des Champs-Élysées d’une étreinte radieuse.
De même, j’imagine la grande pianiste italienne Maria Tipo, qui, elle aussi, nous a quittés récemment, trouvant à cette même porte deux hommes de grande valeur, artistes immortels, qui l’admiraient autant qu’elle les admirait : son comcitoyen Sergio Fiorentino et Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli.
En attendant de vous revoir le 25 janvier 2026 et en vous souhaitant une meilleure année que la précédente, je vous dédie à tous, et plus particulièrement à ma très chère amie Yvonne Schleiter, trois magnifiques sonates de Domenico Scarlatti :
Domenico Scarlatti, SONATE L. 122, L. 142, L. 265 – Maria Tipo (1969)
Bien à vous,
Joe Fallisi
********
Ostuni, December 26, 2025
Dear friends,
first of all, thank you so much for your solidarity, which has been, for me, like a ray of sunshine in the darkness. Only yesterday, after months of waiting, I was able to get my Gmail account back, and thus finally all my inboxes, mailing lists, etc.—a gift from the Unconquered Sun.
I am tired and worn out, but not so much by my misfortune, which, compared to even one day of what the Palestinian martyrs-heroes have endured for two years, is worth less than zero, but rather by the personal and collective grief that has accompanied it. I know that the older we get, the more our tree loses its leaves (friends, dear ones…), approaching the great winter. And yet, more than leaves, for me they are now entire branches, vital parts that disappear irremediably. First the death, which struck me like a bolt from the blue, of John Kaminski, then that of Gian Paolo Pucciarelli, then that of Guillaume Nichols, all three true Friends, to whom I was very fond… and the painful breakup with Michèle Renouf… finally the ascension of my beloved Rexbel to dog heaven. And along with it, the monstrous catastrophe that the Jews, with the approval and aid of the complicit global throng of their Shabbos goyim, have brought about and continue to inflict on Palestine, Syria, Yemen, Lebanon… What is happening and the cowardly silence of my fellow citizens leaves me exhausted and speechless. But here’s a little about my personal story, because I’ve been owing it to you for a long time:
December 4, 2024, 6 a.m. There’s a furious knocking on my door. A dozen DIGOS agents (our mini-NKVD, in the service of Shylock’s international) enter. Their boss informs me that they must proceed, by order of the Bologna Prosecutor’s Office, to search the apartment, and asks if I have a lawyer of my own choosing, or if they should appoint one ex officio. I think of Angelo Cerasino (whom I know some of you have called/written to), an excellent lawyer, both civil and criminal, and one of my few true friends here in Ostuni. So I try calling him (at that hour!)… he answers and accepts immediately. The search begins, and I’m handed the enormous file of the investigation. While they proceed to turn everything upside down, and Vitalma, my good companion, is acting like a true Leo, I sit down and start reading. I can’t believe my eyes and almost pinch myself to know if this is real or if I’m still asleep and dreaming. A judge and a public prosecutor, both women, from the Bologna court accuse me of being an “ideologist” in a “terrorist organization” that allegedly planned to kill our (unfortunately) current Prime Minister of ItaGly, the Trump-supporting and ultra-Zionist Giorgia Meloni (!). I’m shocked and almost laugh, since, obviously, I know nothing about any of this. In fact, as I continue reading, I realize they’ve cleverly placed me, as a “bad teacher,” in a (more or less laughable) story that was completely foreign to me, simply because I’d given an interview (and to this day I stand by it word for word) to a fine online periodical, “Ardire,” and contributed to Telegram chats with my theoretical-historical writings on revisionism and the Jewish question, along with timely, daily counter-information regarding the ongoing genocide of the Palestinians by vile Jewish murderers and filthy torturers. If they’d prosecuted me solely for these “thoughtcrimes,” I would have been charged, but at liberty and without any media attention. Instead, by placing me in that cauldron, they were able to incarcerate me after a special raid and give free rein to the hyena-vultures of the press. Tenor, anarchist (or former anarchist), author of “The Ballad of Pinelli,” pro-Palestinian, 76 years old… “Nazi,” “denier,” “anti-Semitic”… in the heel of Italy, they wrote! What a succulent morsel for such esophaguses (them and their readers)!
They want (one can only imagine who) to punish me for my ideas and my work for justice in Palestine. And that the long, “left-wing” judicial arm of a “right-wing” Israel-licking government is doing it is even more significant. The evil circle is closed. The great paradox, in fact, is that in kosherhamburgerland, a country totally subservient to the Hook Lobby, it’s likely I wouldn’t even be… investigated for my “incorrect” opinions! And this is because of the First Amendment to the US Constitution, which has long been, but so far unsuccessfully, been targeted by the Jews… along with the freedom of American citizens to keep guns at home – a people who can (could) think and express themselves freely… and what’s more, armed… perhaps against their own tyrants!… How horrible!
I refer you to a post on “Libertari” (by the way, it’s also back, fully functional and intact, and now joined by another worthy group, “Undicesimo Toro,” https://www.band.us/band/96714422/post) where you’ll find various details about my adventure and its aftermath so far:
AVANTI, SEMPRE!, https://band.us/band/84909813/post/15202.
I hope none of you ever thought I’d forget about the Robert Faurisson International Prize. While this year, for truly unforeseen reasons, it couldn’t take place (though I know some Italian friends went anyway on January 25th to lay flowers at the Professor’s grave), the seventh edition of the Prize will take place in less than a month, on Robert’s birthday, and in the usual way.
So, to all of you who can come and participate, I invite you to meet me at 11:00 a.m. at the usual location. After Ursula Haverbeck (2019), Vincent Reynouard (2020), Wolfgang Fröhlich (2021), Monika Schaefer and her brother Alfred (2022), Germar Rudolf (2023), and Arthur Butz (2024), we will once again be able to award the Robert Faurisson Prize to someone who truly deserves it.
I like to think that it was the Professor himself who welcomed the faithful, intelligent, and upright Guillaume at the golden gates of the Champs-Élysées with a radiant embrace.
Likewise, I see the great Italian pianist Maria Tipo, who also recently “passed on,” finding two gentlemen and immortal artists waiting for her at the same door who admired her as much as she admired them: her fellow countryman Sergio Fiorentino and Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli.
Seeing you on January 25, 2026, and wishing you a better New Year than the last, I dedicate to all of you, and especially to my very dear friend Yvonne Schleiter, three wonderful sonatas by Domenico Scarlatti:
Domenico Scarlatti, SONATE L. 122, L. 142, L. 265 – Maria Tipo (1969)
Yours
Joe Fallisi
Bill Whatcott Christmas Message & Legal Update
Whatcott Christmas Update
God’s Son came to earth to redeem us from our sin. This is why Christians celebrate Christmas.
“And the angel said to them, “Fear not, for behold, I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord. And this will be a sign for you: you will find a baby wrapped in swaddling cloths and lying in a manger.” And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among those with whom He is pleased!” Luke 2:10-14
Sodomites and other lost souls celebrate Christmas too, but they do not know or understand the significance of the event they are celebrating. They fail to comprehend and may never have even heard of what happened in Bethlehem approximately 2000 years ago. The Christmas Season reminds us that God loves us so much that He sent His only begotten Son to pay the price for our sin, as we apart from His grace are in such darkness that we are unable to atone for our sins by ourselves. It is God’s gift of His Son who came to earth and was crucified that paid the price for us and which enables us to come to Him.
“For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.” Romans 1:26-28
As I write this and reflect on this Holy Season, its significance, and why the original meaning this holiday matters an awful lot, I am sitting in the Edmonton airport on my way to Ontario for Christmas. I can definitely use some prayers this season and I am thankful for those of you who read my updates and make the effort to pray for me.
As for my legal status, my final hearing before I go to trial is January 29th. I will be attending this hearing via zoom. If someone wishes to attend in person the hearing will begin at 10:00 at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on 361 University Ave, in downtown Toronto. Justice Heather McArthur (a Trudeau appointee) will be rendering her decision on wether or not homosexual activist academic Nick Mule’s “expert” evidence can be introduced in my trial. Because my court proceedings are under a publication ban I won’t be able to say anything about what went on in the hearing, so if you want to know you will either have to attend in person or by zoom. I will get the zoom link from my lawyer a day or two before the hearing starts.
The trial dates for my alleged “hate crime” are May 25 – June 12, 2026. I will be required to be in Toronto and to appear in court in person for this trial. The courts have been gracious enough to allow me to travel through the United States to get to my trial, enabling me to visit my former pastor and some of my supporters. This will also save me hotel costs and gas costs, as gas in the USA is less than half what it is when I have to drive through northern Ontario.
I am very pleased that the US Department of Homeland Security evaluated my outstanding “hate crime” charge and the fact I have been acquitted once already and am being forced to go on trial again for the same charge and they decided my alleged “hate crime” is no crime at all in the USA. Last year they granted me the most generous waiver possible with unlimited access to visiting the United States. (I will need a waiver for the rest of my life to enter the United States due to being convicted of illegal entry back in 2002 when I went over the border illegally to witness at Duncan’s abortuary and preach at a Wisconsin Christians United event.)
I wanted to keep my promise to speak at a Wisconsin Christians United Event as I was already paid to speak at it in Septemeber 2002 and I wanted to keep my promise to picket Duncan’s abortuary in Milwaukee. I was able to witness at Duncan’s abortuary with Missionaries to the Preborn in previous years, but in 2002 I wound up enjoying the hospitality of the Minot and Sherbourne county jails for a couple months and never did make it to his abortuary. (But at least I tried) After my stay in the county jails, I was deported from the United States and was banned for 10 years. As for Duncan the abortionist, even though he failed to benefit from my ministry, he self destructed himself and praise God, his abortuary closed on its own after Duncan was convicted of illegal cocaine possession and domestic battery (being the good feminist he claimed to be).
Anyway, while I am in the Hamilton and Toronto areas I can be reached at 403-598-0478 if you are in the area and would like to get together for a coffee.
In Christ’s Service, Bill Whatcott
“For to us a child is born, to us a Son is given; and the government shall be upon His shoulder, and His name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” Isaiah 9:6