Major Victory for Civil Liberties as Court Overturns Woods Ban
Major Victory for Civil Liberties as Court Overturns Woods Ban
Major Victory for Civil Liberties as Court Overturns Woods Ban
Today, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia struck down last summer’s absurd provincial ban on walking, picnicking, and even birdwatching in the woods. In a decisive ruling, the Court agreed with the CCF that Premier Houston’s blanket prohibition on entering the woods violated Canadians’ Charter-protected mobility rights and failed to meaningfully consider the impact. The Court also raised concerns that the ban was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad – so unclear that people couldn’t know what qualified as “woods,” and so extreme that it applied even where no fire risk existed. We are proud to have fought this case and are grateful to our supporters, especially those who signed our petition last summer to restore access to Nova Scotia’s beautiful forests.
In a significant decision released today, the Hartman v. Canada (Attorney General) ruling was upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeal, dismissing a lawsuit brought against the federal government over the death of a teenage boy following a COVID-19 vaccination. The court found that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and agreed with a lower court decision to strike it in its entirety.
The case was brought by Daniel Hartman, whose 17-year-old son, Sean Hartman, died in September 2021. Sean, who had been described as previously healthy, was found dead beside his bed 33 days after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Following the vaccination, he had been taken to hospital due to symptoms his father believes were related to the vaccine.
Sean’s father, Dan Hartman, says his son chose to get vaccinated so he could continue playing hockey, as vaccination was required for participation in many sports and activities at the time.
Hartman’s lawsuit alleged that federal officials, including the Minister of Health, were negligent in approving, promoting, and monitoring the vaccine, and that they acted with reckless indifference or wilful blindness to potential risks.
The Court of Appeal acknowledged the devastating nature of Sean Hartman’s death, describing it as a tragic loss for his family and community. However, the judges concluded that the legal claims could not succeed. Central to the ruling was the finding that the federal government does not owe a private duty of care to individual members of the public when making broad public health decisions during a pandemic. Instead, such decisions are made in the interest of the population as a whole, often requiring difficult trade-offs that may carry risks for some individuals.
The court also determined that the claim failed to establish the necessary elements for misfeasance in public office. Specifically, there were no material facts showing that government officials acted in bad faith or knowingly engaged in unlawful conduct that would likely cause harm to Sean Hartman. The judges noted that the clinical trial data referenced in the lawsuit supported the conclusion that the vaccine was highly effective, undermining the argument that officials knowingly promoted a harmful or ineffective product.
In addition, the court found that the public statements cited in the claim were directed broadly at Canadians and did not create a specific relationship or obligation toward Sean Hartman as an individual. As a result, there was no legal basis to establish the proximity or duty of care required for a negligence claim.
Shockingly, the court also claimed that allowing Hartman’s case to proceed could have broader consequences, including discouraging governments from making urgent public health decisions during emergencies due to fear of legal liability.
The Court of Appeal further upheld the lower court’s decision to deny leave to amend the claim, finding that the proposed changes would not have addressed the fundamental legal deficiencies. The judges emphasized that lawsuits must be based on clearly pleaded facts, not on the possibility that supporting evidence might emerge later.
Ultimately, the court concluded that while the circumstances surrounding Sean Hartman’s death are deeply tragic, the law does not support holding the federal government liable under the claims presented. The appeal was dismissed, bringing the case to a close, with no costs awarded to either side.
The Canadian Independent spoke with Dan Hartman by phone this evening. He said he is “seriously considering” taking the case to the Supreme Court and that he and his legal team will evaluate their next steps over the coming week. Hartman noted that the cost of taking the case to the Supreme Court could exceed $20,000. He added that he does not want to ask those who have already donated to his cause to contribute further but said, “What other option do I have?”
Dan believes the courts are not willing to find the government liable or hold it accountable, as doing so would amount to an admission of wrongdoing. He also argues that such a finding would make his larger lawsuit against Pfizer significantly easier to pursue.
If you want to donate to Dan’s legal fund, you can do so at the link below.
Widdowson turns to court after talk shut down by protest
Freedom of speech at risk, ex-prof argues
Widdowson turns to court after talk shut down by protest
Jesse snyder
15 Apr 2026
EDMONTON • A former university professor who became a contentious figure for questioning claims about the existence of Indigenous unmarked graves says the outcome of her ongoing court battle will set a crucial precedent for academic freedom in Canada.
Frances Widdowson, who launched a legal challenge against University of Lethbridge in July 2023, had her arguments heard by a Court of King’s Bench judge on Friday. Widdowson, a former Mount Royal University professor, argues that the University of Lethbridge restricted her right to free speech when it cancelled her public talk in February 2023.
Blackfoot First Nation protesters and other demonstrators pressured the university to cancel the event, and then-president Michael Mahon consented to their calls amid what the school describes as security concerns. Widdowson — who has prompted similar protests at two other Canadian universities — said the cancellation mirrors a worrying trend of campuses restricting precisely the sorts of open debates they are meant to encourage.
Frances Widdowson says First Nations deserve to have their struggles addressed on a foundation of truth.
“People need to take this seriously, because universities are incredibly important institutions in a democratic society,” Widdowson said. “They let knowledge be disseminated, they’re important in the training of professionals, and are also a bulwark against authoritarianism. All of those functions now are under threat, because you have institutions like the University of Lethbridge, which is not academic at all anymore and has been completely captured by Indigenization activists.”
Court hearings have focused on whether the university had an obligation to protect free speech in the face of the alleged “very real harms” of hosting the event, according to a legal brief filed to the court by Widdowson’s lawyer, Glenn Blackett. Following Friday’s hearings, a ruling is expected in the coming months.
Widdowson has attracted opposition primarily for work in which she has doubted the claims put forward about Indigenous unmarked graves in Canada, with a focus on Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc, previously known as the Kamloops Indian Band, which has claimed that 215 “missing children” are buried in unmarked graves on the site of a former B.C. residential school.
Nearly five years after the initial claim, however, the First Nation has not exhumed the remains of any children. In a February update, the First Nation said its investigation using ground-penetrating radar is ongoing. Widdowson has made a point of emphasizing the lack of evidence, including in a 2025 Youtube documentary called “What Remains: Aftermath of the Kamloops Mass Grave Deception.” (A 2021 Assembly of First Nations resolution referred to the Kamloops claims as an example of “burial sites or mass graves.”)
Widdowson said it was an “open question” whether any children were secretly buried on the Kamloops site but said the allegations need to be scrutinized and supported. The graves are regularly cited as evidence of Canada’s alleged genocide against First Nations.
“Claims should be
asserted
NEVER BEEN A COMPLAINT ABOUT THE QUALITY OR ETHICS OF HER SCHOLARSHIP.
on the basis of reason, evidence and logic, not the basis of a prescribed doctrine,” she said.
The planned February 2023 event was about how “wokeism” was undermining academic freedom. Widdowson agreed to the talk on the invitation of Paul Viminitz, a professor who the university later fired in 2024. (Viminitz was previously a party to Widdowson’s Court of King’s challenge, and Jonah Pickle, a former student, is currently an applicant).
Widdowson has since called on the Alberta government to intervene in her case, but the government has thus far declined.
Elizabeth Harper, spokesperson for Advanced Education Minister Myles Mcdougall, said the province’s universities are obligated to report on their free speech policies, adding that “the University of Lethbridge has been asked to review their policies to ensure that they support free speech.”
Matthew Woodley, a lawyer at Reynolds Mirth Richards & Farmer LLP who is representing the University of Lethbridge, was not available for an interview, according to his assistant.
In a statement, University of Lethbridge spokesperson Trevor Kenney said that the same week of the cancelled talk, Widdowson led two other lectures at the university without incident.
“The University cancelled a room booking for an event involving Frances Widdowson as the result of concerns relating to possible harms raised by members of the University community, including safety risks,” Kenney said.
On May 27, 2021, the Kamloops Indian Band, or Tk’emlúps te Secwepemc, claimed it had located the remains of 215 children — “some as young as three years old” — in an apple orchard at a former residential school site. The claims were based on the results of ground-penetrating radar, which is capable of detecting ground disturbances but does not confirm the presence of human remains.
The next month, the Cowessess First Nation in Saskatchewan said it had found 751 potential unmarked graves at a cemetery near the former Merieval Indian Residential School. (The Cowessess chief emphasized at the time that they were not mass graves, but unmarked ones.)
Some cities including Victoria cancelled their Canada Day celebrations that year, while the government ordered the Canadian flag on federal buildings to fly at half-mast for several months.
Widdowson said Canada’s First Nations deserve to have their many struggles addressed on a foundation of truth.
“If we don’t have the truth, we will not be able to figure out the best way to organize society,” she said. “That’s what’s happened to Aboriginal people now, is that they’re being fed a whole bunch of falsehoods, which are making it impossible for Aboriginal people to thrive and live full lives in modern society.”
In December 2021, Mount Royal University, Widdowson’s former employer, fired her over allegations that a series of tweets she had posted were a form of harassment.
In 2024, an arbitrator found that Widdowson’s dismissal was unwarranted and that, despite her controversial views, there had “never been a complaint about the quality or ethics of her scholarship.”
Whatcott Electioneering at the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Law and Faculty of Music Today
Bill Whatcott at the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Law
Dear Friends,
Today was a fruitful day electioneering at the University of Toronto, though I don’t think I am getting too many votes at this place.
Two of Canada’s potential lawyers, judges, politicians chasing Bill Whatcott and trying to get him to leave the U of T Faculty of Law buildingafter some woke women who I assume were law students freaked out upon recieving my election material
At the Faculty of Law I started my electioneering on the top floor and worked my way down. On each floor students were studying at tables or having lunch and I would leave one of my flyers with them. I also slid my flyers under a number of doors as I walked down the hallways. I noted lots of sodomite pride flags around the Faculty of Law and maybe this explains why our judges and prosecutors think Gospel flyers critical of sodomy at an unGodly pride parade are a bigger threat to society than drug trafficking or auto theft.
Anyways, when I got to the library I handed out some of my election flyers there and then I noticed a few of the women who received my flyer started freaking out and reporting me to the librarian. I gave one to the librarian as well and walked out as she started babbling something or another at me. Then I went to the main floor and was blessed to walk into a cafeteria full of what looked like faculty members and students eating and socializing with eachother. I started giving my election flyer to people there and it wasn’t long before more women freaked out and then the two young men in the picture above started following me and tried to make me leave. Anyways, the young men disengaged after I took their photo and told them I have a Charter right to be there (R. v. Whatcott (W.), (2014) 464 Sask.R. 105andR v Whatcott, 2012 ABQB 231 ). I handed out a few more flyers in the law faculty and then I made my way to the faculty of music.
I’m not much of a music connoisseur. I pretty much only listen to Christian pop or if I’m in the mood I might listen to my Florida trailer park sensation buddy James Carbonaro’s “Vote Bill Whatcott” song: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3phrifalAI.
Anyways, the University of Toronto Faculty of Music was sort of a surreal experience. As I strolled up and down the hallways of the Faculty of Music what I heard seemed to be classical European music, violins, pianos, etc… I would poke my head in some classrooms and would see students, often young Chinese women, playing classical musical instruments and I would leave them my election flyer. But while going up and down the hallways and hearing this type of music my eyes would be assaulted with sodomite pride stickers littering the doors and windows of the Faculty of Music. And I had to ask myself what does celebrating buggery have to do with Beethoven?
Anyways, I leafletted the entire Faculty of Music and then headed back to the Faculty of Law to get my bicycle so I could go and electioneer in some of the surrounding neighbourhoods and then I ran into this campus security guard.
Campus Security guard on his phone reporting my location and in possession of a dozen or so of my election flyers.
When I saw the guard looking at me and in possession of a fist full of my flyers I decided to try to take a photo of him. He didn’t like that and tried to block his face with my flyers and tried to tell me I am not allowed to take pictures of him. I note when he was telling me that I can’t take a picture of him, he was doing a bad job of trying not to look like he was videotaping me. Anyways, I told the security guard I did not appreciate him stealing my flyers from students who needed them to make an informed vote, and I asked for my flyers back. To my surprise he gave them back to me. I handed a couple more flyers out to people standing in front to the Faculty of Law building and then I got on my bike and rode off to some neighbourhoods north of the University to make them aware of my Christ centred, conservative, pro-life, pro-heterosexual, pro-gun, pro-animal eaters rights, candidacy.
Anyways, I might get one vote from the U of T!
A young Christian fellow who wasn’t in law or music but rather math messaged me on Whats App and asked to do a coffee with me. When I got to the coffee shop he begged me not to cause a scene or expose that he was talking to me. Anyways, I promised him I keep people’s identity confidential if they don’t want to be publicly identified with me and I assured him that I could have a coffee without causing civil disorder. Anwyays, we had a nice conversation over coffee on the best strategy to protect Canada’s unborn children. We both agreed all unborn children needed to be protected, but maybe disagreed on how best to get there. My young friend believed we needed to pass a total abortion ban and should not support any law that offers anything less. I agreed that outlawing all abortion was a laudible goal, but I believe in a secular country like Canada we should be a little more pragmatic and realistic about what we can achieve.
I think getting any law on the books ie, 3rd trimester abortion ban, gender selective abortion ban, anything…, is worth supporting, as some children could be saved with these measures and of course we can still work towards making all abortion illegal eventually. Anyways, it was nice to talk to a young man who obviously is engaged with issues near and dear to my heart. He didn’t promise to vote for me. He said he was considering who to vote for. It seemed he was considering either me or the People’s Party of Canada (PPC) candidate Andy D’Andrea.
I don’t have anything bad to say about the PPC and even though I would like his vote, I didn’t try to discourage the young man from giving his vote to the PPC. Their leader Maxime Bernier is a true conservative. In my view, Mr. Bernier showed tremendous courage and integrity when he was arrested during the lockdowns for trying to hold a political rally in defiance of totalitarian public health orders. Though Mr. Bernier is not as pro-life as me, he has publicly stated his opposition to late term abortion, and he is willingness to outlaw the barbaric proceedure; unlike the Federal Conservatives who consistently protect late term abortion. Mr. Bernier welcomes pro-lifers into his party and refuses to cancel them when the media gets hysterical about something they might say, unlike Federal Conservatives who have thrown many pro-life MPs and candidates out of their party when they say something deemed too controversial (honest) for the legacy media’s liking.
But, in some ways my campaign is more truth oriented than the PPC campaign. I’ve seen their flyers aound the riding. They are silent on the sodomite agenda’s assault on our conscience and speech rights. They are silent on the unborn child’s suffering and Canada’s baby holocaust. I’m the only candidate publicly speaking about these issues.
Tomorrow, I should be able to get the last of my flyers into needy University-Rosedale mailboxes and then I will be at my friend Brother Phil’s house on election day, April 13th for a victory celebration as the election results are made public!
So-called “Hate Crime” update:
I have one more hearing before my trial at the Ontario Superior Court, 361 University Ave, Toronto, ON. It will be Monday, April 20th, 9:00 am
My so-called “hate crime” trial is slated to start May 25th and will run until June 12th, at the Ontario Superior Court which is in my University-Rosedale riding, 361 University Ave, Toronto, ON.
If you wish, you can certainly pray that I am the sitting Member of Parliament for University-Rosedale when I go on trial.
In Christ’s Service, Bill Whatcott
To support the Bill Whatcott election campaign and get a tax receipt (Canadian residents only): billwhatcott.2026@gmail.com
To support me while I go on trial a second time for “Wilful Promotion of Hatred” (no tax receipt, just treasure in heaven, anyone can donate) go here: https://www.lifefunder.com/whatcott/
“I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. ” John 11:25,26
German MEP Christine Anderson is sounding a massive alarm: those “under-16 social media bans” aren’t about protecting kids, they are the gateway to a mandatory Digital ID for everyone.
“The EU wants to scan private messages sent from your phone,” Anderson warns. While officials claim it’s about stopping illegal content, she reveals the chilling reality, it means scanning everything you say.
The ultimate goal? Linking every single online move to a Digital ID. “That is called surveillance,” Anderson says. “And putting one’s own citizens under surveillance is the practice best known in totalitarian regimes.”
Are we trading our last shred of digital privacy for a false sense of security
Easter Election Update, Photo of woke person calling 911 after receiving election flyer, secret agents assist Whatcott election campaign
This woke man chased me down the block calling me quite a number of vulgar expletives and demanding I leave the neighbourhood. When I pulled out my phone to record him chasing me he backed up and informed me he is calling the police. In this photo the woke man is on the phone with 911. I can’t hear the conversation, but I assume he is telling the 911 operator he received my election flyer and is not happy.
Dear Friends,
The Easter Season is coming to an end and with confidence we proclaim Christ was crucified, Christ has died, and Christ has Risen!
Christ has died for our sins, paying a debt we could never pay and He is Risen that we can be set free and walk in assurance that nothing can separate us from the Love of God.
“For the love of Christ controls us, because we have concluded this: that One has died for all, therefore all have died; and He died for all, that those who live might no longer live for themselves but for Him who for their sake died and was raised.” 2 Corinthians 5:14,15
I note this election/Easter season the Liberals don’t feel the same way I do about Easter. During last year’s 2025 general election the Liberals couldn’t help themselves, of all the days in the year to open the advanced polls, they had to do it on Good Friday, Easter Sunday, and Easter Monday. This year for the 2026 bye-elections they did it again. The Liberals couldn’t do their advanced polls a week earlier or a week later in deference to Christianity’s holiest Season. They had to open their advanced polls right on the Easter Holidays. Not even Walmart does that; just Canada’s Liberals; the same creatures who want to euthanize elderly, homeless, and mentally ill people.
When I was delivering my election flyers door to door this weekend, I came across this sign in one livingroom window. Note the nurse has a smiling face, the capped needles, the flowers, and what looks like happy and positive neighbourhood imagery.The reality in neighbourhoods that get so-called “harm reduction” is never as rosy as what the picture in the livingroom window portrays. “Harm reduction” always mean open drug use, garbage, and needles strewn everywhere. The reality is skyrocketing crime, skyrocketing overdoses, and skyrocketing overdose death rates. They are a huge burden for the healthcare and justice system with no positive return.
On Friday I was delivering my flyers door to door in the Little Italy and Little Portugal districts of my riding. To my pleasant surprise I think I got a couple potential voters. When I was trying to gather signatures for my nomination last month the folks in this district were mostly unhelpful. Many when I asked for their signature would just say “no speak English” and close their doors in my face. Now that I am putting my election flyer in their hands, several of them have said “God bless you,” or “good,” when they see the murdered baby and the criticism of Prime Minister Carney as he embraces a naked sodomite at the Vancouver unGodly Pride Parade.
One fellow I met in the neighbourhood was a Venezuelan refugee. He looked at my flyer and said “that’s good” and asked for a second one. He had excellent English and we had quite a good conversation. He was an Evangelical Christian who fled the Maduro regime in Venezuela. My refugee friend already had a conservative mindset when he arrived in Canada and told me when he arrived he only took government benefits for 3 months. Over his social worker’s objection my friend refused further handouts as he got his carpentry business going and was making enough money to sustain himself and his family on his own. Indeed when I bounced into him he was busy renovating a home in the University-Rosedale neighbourhood where I am electioneering. My friend commented that in almost every way he sees Canada going on the same trajectory that Venezuela was on when Hugo Chavez took power. First Chavez confiscated legal firearms and then destroyed Venezuela’s small businesses and oil industry. Chavez then put the country in massive debt, triggered inflation, and incrementally restricted Venezuelan freedoms. Sadly, I couldn’t disagree with my friend’s observations as they pertain to Canada.
Saturday morning, I electioneered around the Bathurst and Bloor area. A couple women in their twenties and thirties yelled when they received my election flyer, but then it was quiet for quite awhile as I bounced house to house. It rained off and on and was cold, so I guess that kept most people indoors. Just over halfway through my Bloor/Bathurst electioneering the pleasant fellow in the top picture above came flying out of his house as I left his property and graced his neighbour’s mailbox with my election platform. Immediately the guy started calling me a multitude of vulgar names and demanded I leave the neighbourhood. He was screaming about kids seeing the picture of the aborted child. In 30 years of delivering pictures of murdered unborn children I never had a single child lose their minds after seeing them. Only woke adults who mostly support abortion go really nuts when they are confronted with the victims of Canada’s tax funded holocaust.
Anyway, seeing as the guy was screaming at me I asked him if he was concerned about the actual children being murdered by abortion and the pain they go through, or was he only upset by the picture. I got no answer just swear words, so I ignored the guy and kept delivering my flyers to the mailboxes. The fellow left for a second and then came back screaming I was a “piece of s—-.!” I was concerned the guy might hit me and he was younger and bigger, so I pulled out my phone which caused the guy to back off and I got the picture above as he is shouting he’s calling the police.
Toronto being Toronto, I expected the police to show up and possibly arrest me so I picked up the pace a little and tried to get as many mailboxes done as I could before the police arrived. Anyways, a couple minutes later the guy caught up to me again and asked me in a more reasonable tone if I could stop putting my election flyer into people’s mailboxes and leave the neighbourhood. He tried to explain to me the children were being harmed by my flyer. The Toronto Police to their credit obviously told the guy my election flyer was not an emergency and they were not responding. I told the guy I would leave his neighbourhood when I was done delivering my flyers and him and the children he professed to be so concerned about would be just fine.
Later on I got a text from someone asking for my “tasty crow stew” recipe. Happy to oblige a potential voter, I sent my savory recipe to the texter immediately. I got no feed back whether the texter is actually tried my crow stew recipe or not. My only advice is if the texter reads this, he should be careful where he shoots his crow. In downtown Toronto the authorities hate legal guns and in Toronto’s courts unborn children and the elderly might not count for much, but for certain black crow lives matter. I would hate to think what would happen to the poor sap who ever shoots a crow in Toronto city limits. I remember years ago a Chinese man was arrested at gun point for killing a raccoon in Toronto’s city limits and the guy was subjected to relentless media demonization and animal rights protests while he was going through the courts.
Around 4 pm I was tired and sore. Some friends in Scarborough invited me for supper, so I headed their way. Shortly after I arrived at my friend’s house my campaign appeared to hit a really serious obstacle. An investigator from Elections Canada by the name of Alan Saraman (approximate spelling) called me and told me they received a complaint from someone in my riding that my flyer was apparently not compliant with the Elections Act. Apparantly my flyer needed the words “Approved by Tim Millar Official Agent” on it and I had to cease delivery of the rest of my flyers, until I could become compliant with this regulation.
When I got off the phone I was feeling a little deflated as I still had almost 800 flyers that needed to get out and writing those words on each individual flyer was going to be a massive job and I wanted to get them out on Monday before the advanced polls closed. Thankfully, my friend Brither Phil had connections to elite foreign agents working for the CIA (Christian Intelligence Agency) who resided undercover deep in enemy territory in the depths of Toronto, but whose true citizenship is in the Kindom of Heaven.
“But our citizenship is in heaven, and from it we await a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ, who will transform our lowly body to be like His glorious body, by the power that enables Him even to subject all things to Himself.” Philippians 3:20,21
My street preacher friend Brother Phil and his top secret CIA (Christian Intelligence Agency) agents working to make my flyers compliant with the Elections Act after I received a 5:30 pm Saturday evening cease and desist orderfrom delivering my flyers until they complied with a regulation that every single one of my flyers has the message “Approved by Tim Miller Official Agent” on them.
God truly came through for me in ways beyond what I expected this Easter weekend. Election day is Monday, April 13th.
In Christ’s Service, Bill Whatcott
To support the Bill Whatcott election campaign and get a tax receipt (Canadian residents only): billwhatcott.2026@gmail.com
To support me while I go on trial a second time for “Wilful Promotion of Hatred”. The Crown Prosecutor is asking 1 year in prison because I delivered 3000 life saving Gospel flyers to sodomites and their supporters in the Toronto unGodly Pride parade in 2016 while disguised as a Gay Zombie Cannabis Consumer go here: https://www.lifefunder.com/whatcott/
“By this we know love, that he laid down his life for us, and we ought to lay down our lives for the brothers.” 1 John 3:16
Raw video, woke people F-bombing and trying to throw Whatcott out of Apartment building and nice photo with David Menzies from Rebel News
Bill with my absolutely, bar none, favourite journalist David, the Menzoid Menzies from Rebel NewsBill and his friend Mark who lost his job with the Toronto Transit Commission for resisting their coercive mask and vaccine mandates during the Covid hysteria and who now has a much more fulfilling and meaningful job driving
This video is from an apartment in the Rosedale part of the University-Rosedale riding where I am running as a Christ centred, conservative, pro-life, pro-gun, pro-heterosexual, federal candidate. Three people in this building did not like my election flyer. Two of them F-bombed me, one videotaped me, and all three demanded I leave the building without sharing my election platform with the other residents who may have been interested in reading my election platform.
I ran into David Menzies on Yorkville Ave close to the Election Canada headquarters. At the 11:25 mark you can see a brief clip of him interviewing me
Dear Friends,
I got out just over 200 election flyers today in the Rosedale neighbourhood of my riding. Most of the door to door leafletting was uneventful and tiring. Even though Rosedale is on the edge of downtown Toronto the properties are large and quite spaced out. More challenging yet, many of the homes are at the top of steep hills and you have to climb lots of steps to get to them. The homes are quite expensive and the neighbourhood is exclusive. In Toronto’s Rosedale neighbourhood homes seem to sell for somewhere between $4 – $7 million dollars.
One gentleman from Rosedale called me to swear at me for putting my election flyer into his mailbox. We actually had a fairly productive 10-15 minute or so conversation after we got past the F-bombs. First he yelled at me that his kids could have seen the flyer. When I told him kids are harmed by abortion then he challenged me that early abortions don’t look like my picture. I told him my photo is a perfectly legal abortion in Canada of a baby murdered at 24 weeks gestation.
Somehow we then got into an argument about the existance of God and he concluded I was nuts and going to lose the election because I believed in God. Seeing as God created him, me, and the world that we live in, I countered the most sane position to take is that God is real and He created us. From there we got back to being triggered about my election flyer. I told him NDP flyers trigger me and in a free society I have to deal with it. The fellow then really swore and to my surprise agreed with me and starting going on about the NDP convention being a “total freak show.”
Adrienne Smith moderator of the recent NDP convention that became an internationally famous gong show
Well, even if the guy doesn’t believe murdering babies is wrong, and fails to recognize God created him, at least he has enough sense to know the NDP is full of woke, gender confused, dysfunctionals. I went on about the NDP carrying on about pronouns and ignoring actual issues harming Canadians, like Alberta not being able to develop its energy resources and how we could have rescued Europe and Asia from the economic carnage those two continents are facing due to the Straight of Hormuz being shut down by Iran, and how we could have prospered immensely as a nation, but sadly we have 2.5 million Canadians using food banks and were are not even in the discussion on international energy security, as we have no infrastructure to sell our oil and Carney is still talking nonsense about “decarbonized oil” and not actually allowing any oil sands projects or pipelines to be built. The fellow finished with “William you and I agree on economic issues” and with that we bid eachother goodnight.
Anyways, Lord willing I will be electioneering on the University of Toronto campus on Tuesday and in west end neighbourhoods in my riding tomorrow. Please pray for God’s protection and success for my election campaign. Voting day is April 13th…..
In Christ’s Service, Bill Whatcott
Access to apartment, condo and co-operative buildings
Candidates and authorized canvassers are only entitled to access multiple residence buildings from the day the writs are issued to election day:
Access is limited to between 9 AM and 9 PM, from Monday to Friday, or between 9 AM and 6 PM on a Saturday or Sunday.
At least one person seeking access must be at least 18 years of age.
Every person seeking access must, on request, provide valid identification.
Every person seeking access who is not a candidate must, on request, provide a valid Canvasser Authorization Form (Form F0436) from the candidate.
To help with my Christ Centred, pro-life, pro-gun, pro-animal eaters rights, pro-heterosexual election campaign an e-transfer can be made to my official agent and he will issue you a tax receipt (for Canadian residents only): billwhatcott.2026@gmail.com
For those who want to know more about my upcoming, double jeopardy (I was acquitted once already) hate crime trial, which will be going from May 25-June 13, 2026 and to help with my living expenses while I am stuck here in Toronto the most expensive city in Canada (my room rent (shared kitchen with 3 other people) is $1400 a month) https://www.lifefunder.com/whatcott/
“Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.” Matthew 5: 11,12
Extraordinary events happened on the University of Lethbridge campus on February 4th, 2026. Mob behaviour in the Atrium was so extreme that campus security was inadequate, and the Lethbridge Police force had to be called in. I am wondering if an investigation has taken place, and if there were any repercussions for the violent and abusive elements in the crowd.
Apparently an email was sent out on the morning of February 4th, in which students and faculty were warned that there would be a controversial individual coming to the Atrium. The message implied that this was a problematic person, and so it follows that the students were being encouraged and incited to deal with the visitor as an unwelcomed entity. Some classes were even cancelled, to facilitate maximum attendance in the Atrium.
The email sent out to students and faculty did not name the unwelcome guest, but we can assume the reference was to Professor Frances Widdowson. It turned out that there were four people. Professor Emeritus Anthony Hall attended with Professor Frances Widdowson, and both professors brought their spouses. Professor Hall had taught at the U of Lethbridge for 26 years until 2016. This was his campus.
The crowd of students (and others?) which gathered in the Atrium on February 4th became aggressive, violent, loud and utterly disrespectful (understatement!) towards the four elderly people — Frances Widdowson being the young one among them. Professor Hall and his wife are both in their 70’s. The students truly took on angry mob behaviour.
They had signs to the effect of “make your ears bleed!”, while blasting horns mere inches from the ears of the visiting four. Those instruments were fetched from the music room. Property was vandalized. All of Professor Hall’s papers which he had brought along were grabbed and torn to pieces. This aggressive behaviour continued for a long time. Eventually Tony Hall was left alone, unprotected, while still surrounded by the mob. To my understanding, he was physically jostled, and thrown out onto the sidewalk by this mob.
The logical, sane, and correct response to this criminal assault on the four visitors would be a serious investigation followed by serious repercussions. Instead, the students have been praised for their behaviour. Professor Leroy Littlebear held a “purification ceremony” the following week, and congratulated the students, telling them they did well.
Is this for real? What does that say about the University of Lethbridge? What are the students learning? What is the agenda? What kind of behaviour is being encouraged?
Will there be an investigation into these events? Have criminal charges been laid yet?
Here are two articles, both of which should be studied and utilized as evidence in your investigation:
This is a very serious matter, and I await a response.
sincerely,
Monika Schaefer
McBride, B.C.
250-569-7024 (land-line)
To the Minister of Advanced Education in Alberta the Honourable Myles McDougall,
~ copied to ‘cc’ list shown below, and an extensive ‘bcc’ list not shown (blind copy) ~
Extraordinary events happened on the University of Lethbridge campus on February 4th, 2026. Mob behaviour in the Atrium was so extreme that campus security was inadequate, and the Lethbridge Police force had to be called in. I am wondering if an investigation has taken place, and if there were any repercussions for the violent and abusive elements in the crowd.
Apparently an email was sent out on the morning of February 4th, in which students and faculty were warned that there would be a controversial individual coming to the Atrium. The message implied that this was a problematic person, and so it follows that the students were being encouraged and incited to deal with the visitor as an unwelcomed entity. Some classes were even cancelled, to facilitate maximum attendance in the Atrium.
The email sent out to students and faculty did not name the unwelcome guest, but we can assume the reference was to Professor Frances Widdowson. It turned out that there were four people. Professor Emeritus Anthony Hall attended with Professor Frances Widdowson, and both professors brought their spouses. Professor Hall had taught at the U of Lethbridge for 26 years until 2016. This was his campus.
The crowd of students (and others?) which gathered in the Atrium on February 4th became aggressive, violent, loud and utterly disrespectful (understatement!) towards the four elderly people — Frances Widdowson being the young one among them. Professor Hall and his wife are both in their 70’s. The students truly took on angry mob behaviour.
They had signs to the effect of “make your ears bleed!”, while blasting horns mere inches from the ears of the visiting four. Those instruments were fetched from the music room. Property was vandalized. All of Professor Hall’s papers which he had brought along were grabbed and torn to pieces. This aggressive behaviour continued for a long time. Eventually Tony Hall was left alone, unprotected, while still surrounded by the mob. To my understanding, he was physically jostled, and thrown out onto the sidewalk by this mob.
The logical, sane, and correct response to this criminal assault on the four visitors would be a serious investigation followed by serious repercussions. Instead, the students have been praised for their behaviour. Professor Leroy Littlebear held a “purification ceremony” the following week, and congratulated the students, telling them they did well.
Is this for real? What does that say about the University of Lethbridge? What are the students learning? What is the agenda? What kind of behaviour is being encouraged?
Will there be an investigation into these events? Have criminal charges been laid yet?
Here are two articles, both of which should be studied and utilized as evidence in your investigation:
