Bill Whatcott at a gun range shooting a Berretta 9 mm handgun. Only 2 years ago this was a common firearm, legally owned by thousands of Canadian handgun enthusiasts who went through the proper legal channels to possess these wonderful guns. Prime Minister Trudeau banned these firearms through a parliamentary order two years ago and interestingly he has done nothing to address the actual rising violent crime and disorder which has become a plague across the country.
In fact in 2021 Trudeau’s Liberals got rid of mandatory minimum sentences for actual gun criminals. As a result of Trudeau abolishing mandatory minimums for gun crimes, one of the Trudeau’s appointed judges, Justice Jill Copeland (she ordered me to go on trial a second time for a Gospel flyer), was able to give a black offender a conditional sentence (no time in jail). Justice Copeland in her decision said the major reason for giving the guy a non-custodial sentence was his skin colour. The criminal Copeland sent home was Shacquane Stewart. He threw a loaded .40 cal handgun into a school yard when police were pursuing him as a result of a cocaine deal gone bad. Fortunately, a school custodian found the loaded gun, the following day, rather than one of the children. Six weeks after receiving his conditional sentence Shacquane was arrested at his probation officer’s office in a stolen car, with another loaded handgun, and a search of his apartment netted 107 grams of cocaine. Justice Copeland in justifying her racist and absurd sentence also reasoned that Shacquane was “at low risk to reoffend.” These are the types of judges Trudeau has been stacking our courts with.
The firearms behind me are on display at the gun club I attended. All of them with the exception of the semi auto shotgun at the top of the display are now prohibited in Canada. Those of us who value firearm freedom must lobby Pollievre to reverse the handgun ban. I must admit I don’t have much faith in Pollievre to follow through on his commitments to restore gun rights, defund the CBC, or end transgender mutilation of children. Pollievre’s slogan “Axe the tax” has been repeated enough, he will likely end the carbon tax, but the necessary fundamental shift of taking us out of harmful treaties like the Paris Accord and challenging the false, media backed, premise of the carbon tax (that Canada must end the tiny amount of CO2 emissions we create to avert armaggedon) will not likely be challenged by him.
On election night I hung out with the Constitution Party (sort of like Canada’s Christian Heritage Party) in Milwaukee Wisconsin. I was blessed to see their leader Randall Terry came to Milwaukee with his Vice President Pastor Stephen Broden for election night. Randall Terry like me has been jailed and sued multiple times for trying to save babies at abortion mills. Randall Terry’s book “Why does a nice guy like me keep getting thrown in jail,” was a major inspiration in my early activist years. Pastor Stephen Broden was a blessing to listen to as well. He is the one black leader who has the courage and wisdom to articulate what is wrong with critical race theory, the toxic Marxist inpired theory that underpins Justice Copeland’s flawed assumption that all blacks in Toronto suffer from systemic racism. Copeland’s racist and Marxist thinking led her to a place where she thought she should let a black gun criminal avoid jail time after he tossed a loaded, illegally obtained, handgun into a school yard when police start pursuing him after his drug deal went bad.
Randall Terry had me briefly share about the so-called hate crime, double jeopardy, trial I am facing when I get back to Canada.
My good friends JR Harrison, host of the BJ Edwards Natural Family podcast on the left, and my good friend Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth, who I got arrested with at the University of Regina back in 2014 on the right.
Here is the video of me and Peter being arrested. We were charged with Mischief, but eventually acquitted.
A good friend Keith who has faithfully supported me with my legal battles over the years on the left, and Brian Camenkar, Executive Director of Mass Resistance (they have been very loyal friends), enjoy lunch and fellowship at a restraunt in the suburbs of Boston.
I went to Grace Chapel in Foxborough Massachusetts on Sunday. The church was kind of milquetoast for my liking. This guy on the stage is a youth pastor I think. The senior pastor was not in person but delivered his sermon on a video screen. The sermon was sort of like Kamala Harris’ campaign theme. The sermon’s theme was on “Joy,” but the sermon was a little better than Kamala’s campaign as it had a few Bible verses added to it. Part of the sermon was also dedicated to America’s post election results. The Pastor said some in the congregation would be happy with Trump, but he urged them to be sensitive to congregants who could be emotionally devastated and fearful after Kamala Harris lost. I must admit, I had some concerns with the Pastor’s seeming lack of understanding that Harris’ agenda was the antithesis of what Christians should want for America.
Anyways, I will be back in Canada Monday. I will be stopping in St Catharines to visit a dear Pastor who seems to be recovering from cancer thanks to Ivermectin. I was a fan of Ivermectin for Covid, but I was highly skeptical that the anti-fever, anti-parasite drug has any efficacy for colon cancer. That being said the Pastor’s tumor has shrunk 80% after 6 weeks of taking Ivermectin.
I will be back in Alberta next week where I hope to shoot a deer before deer season ends and then linger between Alberta and Ontario and try to survive until I have to be back in court in Toronto in June 23-27, 2025 (Homosexual UnGodly Pride parade week I think). Then I am in court in Toronto again, October 27-31, 2025. And then my trial is finally slated to start March 2, 2026 and is expected to last two weeks.
For those who wish to help with some of my expenses related to this homofascist inspired double jeopardy prosecution you can donate here: https://www.lifefunder.com/whatcott
In Christ’s Service, Bill Whatcott
“For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due.” Romans 1:26,27
We are almost a quarter of a century into the third millennium Anno Domini. In that period the alphabet soup – LGBTTQAEIOUandsometimesY – gang has grown accustomed to getting whatever it demands, no matter how ludicrous, absurd, or even downright insane, the demand happens to be. This is true in general across the civilization formerly known as Christendom but nowhere more so than here in the Dominion of Canada. It has been especially true here for the last nine years since Captain Airhead became the creepiest little low-life sleazebag ever to disgrace the office of the first minister of His Majesty’s government in Ottawa. Captain Airhead has aggressively promoted the craziest, most fringe, and least defensible elements of the alphabet soup agenda as if they were commonsensical, had the weight of universally recognized moral truth behind them, and could be opposed only by knuckle-dragging moral reprobates. If knuckle-dragging moral reprobation is what is required to oppose such things then Captain Airhead ought to be leading the opposition. He was never able to add two and two together and come up with four, however. Just look at his budgets.
One consequence of Captain Airhead’s alphabet soup policies has been a sharp decline in average intelligence in the country. We might call this the Trudeau Effect. It is the opposite of the Flynn Effect, the psychometric phenomenon named after James Flynn by Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein in The Bell Curve (1994) that was the reason standardized IQ tests needed to be revised, updated, and recalibrated periodically to prevent the average from running significantly over 100. The Trudeau Effect is when, due to constant government-backed gas-lighting and bullying, intelligence so declines that people no longer understand the difference between what is true in reality and what someone mistakenly thinks or imagines to be true. Before Captain Airhead we could say in response to those pushing the trans part of the alphabet soup agenda that we don’t accept that the person who thinks he is a chicken actually is a chicken, we don’t accept that the person who thinks he is Napoleon Bonaparte actually is who he thinks he is, and neither should we accept that the boy who thinks he is a girl is a girl or that the girl who thinks she is a boy is a boy. Today, not only do fewer and fewer people understand this, the aggressive promotion of the trans agenda has brought us to the point where there is now a demand that we regard people who think they are something other than people as being what they think or say they are.
This is why it has been rather encouraging over the last year or so to see a growing push back against this insanity. Most recently, Danielle Smith, the premier of Alberta, announced a new set of policies and upcoming legislation for her province that would restrict the genital and breast mutilation sickeningly called by such deranged euphemisms as gender-reassignment surgery or gender-affirming care to those who have reached the age of majority, ban puberty-blockers for those under the age of 16, require that parents be notified and give their consent when pervert teachers try to brainwash their kids into thinking they are the opposite sex/gender, require parental consent for sex education and that all sex ed curricula be approved by the minister of education, and prevent the sort of situation that Ray Stevens has hilariously lampooned in his new song “Since Bubba Changed His Name to Charlene”. In other words, policies and legislation that anyone who isn’t a total idiot, insane, under the influence of an evil spirit or a substance that turns one’s mind to goo or both, evil on a megalomaniacal scale, or some combination of these, could and would support. Needless to say, both Captain Airhead and Jimmy Dhaliwal, the supervillain who somehow broke out of the cartoon universe and into our own and having been denied entry to India due to his connections to the extremists who want to break that country up opted to become the leader of the socialist party here, have been having conniptions over this.
Most news media commentators have joined the whacko politicians like Airhead and Dhaliwal in howling in outrage over what could be best described as the very, bare bones, minimum of a sensible provincial policy towards alphabet soup gender politics. This will not come as a shock to many, I suspect. Canadian newspapers have acted as if their role was to propagate the ideas of and bolster support for the Liberal Party since at least the time when John Wesley Defoe edited the Winnipeg Free Press. Arguably it goes back even further to when George Brown edited the Toronto Globe, the predecessor of today’s Globe and Mail. That the new technological means of mass communication seemed designed to project a distorted view of reality that served the interests of some ideological vision of progress rather than of truth was a critique made by such varied observers as the American Richard M. Weaver, the French Jacques Ellul, and the Canadian Marshall McLuhan. It was radio, television, and the motion picture industry that these men had in mind. The second revolution in mass communications technology that gave us the internet, smartphones, social media, and streaming services has since eclipsed the first. It has not rectified the problem those astute social critics and technosceptics saw in the earlier mass communications media any more than Captain Airhead’s bailout of the struggling Canadian newspapers solved the problem of their heavy bias towards the Liberal Party but rather, in both instances, the problem was exponentially magnified.
John Ibbitson wrote a piece that argued that Smith’s policies were endangering all teenagers in Alberta. Naturally, the Globe and Mail had the poor taste to publish it. The obvious reality is that no teenagers – or anybody else for that matter – are endangered by Smith’s policies. Max Fawcett, the lead columnist for Canada’s National Observer, attempted to argue that Smith, who has long been identified with the libertarian wing of Canadian conservatism, has betrayed her ideology. As Pierre Poilievre, the current leader of His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition, the Conservative Party, pointed out, however, when he – finally – took a stand in favour what Smith was doing, prohibiting people from making irreversible, life-altering, decisions while they are children means protecting their right to make adult choices as adults. That is hardly something that could be described as irreconcilably out of sync with libertarian ideals As an indicator of just how cuckoo most of the media reporting on this has been, Ibbitson’s and Fawcett’s are among the saner of the anti-Smith pieces that have appeared.
Poilievre also predicted that Captain Airhead will eventually have to back down on this issue. I certainly hope that he is right about that and that soon we will have the pleasure of watching Captain Airhead eat his own words. In the meantime, it is good to see that a rational, sane, pushback against the alphabet soup madness has finally begun. Let us hope and pray that it continues and spreads. — Gerry T. Neal
Leap Day this year is the fortieth anniversary of Pierre Elliot Trudeau’s announcement that during a “walk in the snow” he had decided that he would step down and not lead the Liberal Party into the next Dominion election. He had been leader of the Grits for sixteen years since Lester Pearson stepped down in April of 1968. With the exception of the six month premiership of Joe Clark he had been Prime Minister all that time. His was the third longest premiership in Canadian history. The longest was that of William Lyon Mackenzie King who had been a different kind of Liberal leader. King, like Trudeau, had been a traitor to Canada, her history, heritage, and traditions, but in his case it was American-style capitalist liberalism to which he had sold us out. In the case of Pierre Trudeau it was Soviet and Chinese Communism that was his true master. Canada’s second longest premiership was also her first that of Sir John A. Macdonald. Sir John had been the leader of the Fathers of Confederation and never betrayed us. Nor did Canadians ever grow tired of Old Tomorrow. Shortly before his death in 1891 he won his sixth majority in that year’s Dominion Election by campaigning for “The Old Flag, the Old Policy, the Old Leader” against a Liberal Party that sought to move us closer economically and culturally into the orbit of the United States. By contrast by the time Trudeau took his famous walk Canadians had grown absolutely sick and tired of him. The Liberals were heading to defeat, Trudeau knew it, and in the interest of preserving his legacy and what was left of his reputation jumped off the ship before it sank.
The electorate’s having grown sick of Trudeau and his party should be regarded as the expected outcome when a Prime Minister remains in office for a long period of time. Sir John’s enduring popularity can be taken as the exception explainable by the fact that he was an exceptional statesman, identified with the country he led as no other Prime Minister could ever hope to be due to his central role in her founding, and a personable leader to whom people could relate. When a Sovereign, like Queen Victoria during whose reign Confederation took place or like our late Queen Elizabeth II of Blessed Memory, has an exceptionally long reign this is cause for celebration and rejoicing. It is the role of the Sovereign, after all, to embody the principle of continuity and everything that is enduring, lasting, and permanent in the realm. The man who fills the Prime Minister’s office, by contrast, is very much the man of the moment. Premierships, therefore, are usually best kept short.
Pierre Trudeau’s son, Captain Airhead, has been Prime Minister since 2015 and Canadians are now far sicker of him than they ever were of his father. Personally, I had had more than enough of him while he was still the third party leader prior to the 2015 Dominion Election. Why it took this long for the rest of the country to catch up with me I have no idea but here we are. It is 2024 and Canadians are divided on whether they would like Captain Airhead to follow his father’s footsteps and take a walk in the snow, whether they would like to see him suffer the humiliation of going down in defeat in the next Dominion Election or whether they would like to see him brought down in an act of direct divine intervention involving a lightning bolt that strikes the ground beneath him causing it to open up, swallow him whole, and belch out fire and brimstone. What unites Canadians is that we all wish that he would make like Dr. Seuss’ Marvin K. Mooney and “please go now.” Thermidor is rapidly approaching for Captain Airhead and his version of the Liberal Party as it eventually comes for all Jacobins.
The Canadian Robespierre seems determined, however, not to go to his inevitable guillotine without one last stab at imposing his ghoulish and clownish version of the Reign of Terror. On Monday the Liberals tabled, as they have been threatening to do since the last Dominion Election, Bill C-63, an omnibus bill that would enhance government power in the name of combatting “online harms.” A note to American readers, in the Commonwealth to “table” a bill does not mean to take it off the table, i.e., to suspend or postpone it as in the United States, but rather to put it on the table, i.e., to introduce it. Defenders of omnibus bills regard them as efficient time-savers. They are also convenient ways to smuggle in something objectionable that is unlikely to pass if forced to stand on its own merits by rolling it up with something that is desirable and difficult or impossible to oppose without making yourself look bad. In this case, the Liberals are trying to smuggle in legislation that would allow Canadians to sue other Canadians for up to $20 000, with the possibility of being fined another $50 000 payable to the government thrown in on top of it, over online speech they consider to be hateful and legislation that would make it possible for someone to receive life imprisonment for certain “hate crimes”, by rolling it up in a bill ostensibly about protecting children from online bullying and pornographic exploitation. As is always the case when the Liberals introduce legislation that has something to do with combatting hate it reads like they interpreted George Orwell’s depiction of Big Brother in 1984 as a “how-to” manual.
Nobody with an IQ that can be expressed with a positive number could possibly be stupid enough to think that this Prime Minister or any of his Cabinet cares about protecting children. Consider their response to the actions taken over the last year or so by provincial premiers such as New Brunswick’s Blaine Higgs and Alberta’s Danielle Smith to do just that, protect children from perverts in the educational system hell-bent on robbing children of their innocence and filling their heads with sex and smut from the earliest grades. Captain Airhead and his corrupt cohorts denounced and demonized these premiers’ common-sense, long overdue, efforts, treating them not as the measures taken in defense of children and their parents and families that they were, but as an attack on the alphabet soup gang, one of the many groups that the Liberals and the NDP court in the hopes that these in satisfaction over having their special interests pandered to will overlook the progressive left’s contemptuous disregard for the common good of the whole country and for the interests of those who don’t belong to one or another of their special groups.
Nor could any Canadian capable of putting two and two together and who is even marginally informed about what has been going on in this country in this decade take seriously the Prime Minister’s posturing about hate. The leader of His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition, Pierre Poilievre, when asked about what stance the Conservatives would take towards this bill made the observation that Captain Airhead given his own past is the last person who should be dictating to other Canadians about hate. Poilievre was referring to the blackface scandal that astonishingly failed to end Captain Airhead’s career in 2019. It would have been more to the point to have referenced the church burnings of 2021. In the summer of that year, as Captain Airhead hosted conferences on the subjects of anti-Semitism and Islamophobia that consisted of a whole lot of crying and hand-wringing and thinking out ways to get around basic rights and freedoms so as to be able to throw in gaol anyone who looks at a Jew or Muslim cross-eyed, Canada was in the midst of the biggest spree of hate crimes in her history. Christian church buildings all across Canada were targeted for arson and/or other acts of vandalism. Not only did Captain Airhead fail to treat this violent and criminal display of Christophobia as a serious problem in the same way he was treating these other types of hatred directed towards specific religions he played a significant role in inciting these attacks on Canada’s Christian churches by promoting a narrative in which all allegations against Canada’s churches and her past governors with regards to the Indian Residential Schools are accepted without question or requirement of proof. (1)
Clearly Captain Airhead does not give a rat’s rump about hate qua hate. If hatred is directed towards people he doesn’t like, like Christians, he shrugs it off even when it is expressed through violent, destructive, crime. If it is directed against people he likes, or, more accurately, against groups to which he panders, he treats it as if it were the most heinous of crimes even if it is expressed merely in words. While I am on principle opposed to all laws against hate since they are fundamentally unjust and by nature tyrannical (2) they are especially bad when drawn up by someone of Captain Airhead’s ilk.
Captain Airhead’s supposed concern about “online harms” is also a joke. Consider how he handles real world harms. His approach to the escalating problem of substance abuse is one that seeks to minimize the harm drug abusers do to themselves by providing them with a “safe” supply of their poison paid for by the government. This approach is called “harms reduction” even though when it comes to the harms that others suffer from drug abuse such as being violently attacked by someone one doesn’t know from Adam because in his drug-induced mania he thinks his victim is a zombie space alien seeking to eat his brain and lay an egg in the cavity, this approach should be called “harms facilitation and enablement.” Mercifully, there is only so much Captain Airhead can do to promote this folly at the Dominion level and so it is only provinces with NDP governments, like the one my province was foolish enough to elect last year, that bear the full brunt of it. Then there was his idea that the solution to the problem of overcrowded prisons and criminal recidivism was to release those detained for criminal offenses back into the general public as soon after their arrest as possible. Does this sound like someone who can be trusted to pass legislation protecting people from “online harms”?
Captain Airhead inadvertently let slip, last week, the real reason behind this bill. In an interview he pined for the days when Canadians were all on the same page, got all their information from CBC, CTV, and Global, before “conspiracy theorists” on the internet ruined everything. He was lamenting the passing of something that never existed, of course. People were already getting plenty of information through alternative sources on the internet long before his premiership and the mainstream legacy media became far more monolithic in the viewpoints it presented during and because of his premiership. What he was pining for, therefore, was not really something that existed in the past, but what he has always hoped to establish in the future – a Canada where everyone is of one opinion, namely his. This is, after all, the same homunculus who, back when a large segment of the country objected to him saying that they would be required to take a foreign substance that had been inadequately tested and whose manufacturers were protected against liability into their bodies if they ever wanted to be integrated back into ordinary society, called them every name in the book and questioned whether they should be tolerated in our midst.
Some have suggested that Bill C-63 is not that bad compared with what the Liberals had originally proposed three years ago. It still, however, is a thinly-veiled attempt at thought control from a man who is at heart a narcissistic totalitarian and whose every act as Prime Minister, from trying to reduce the cost of health care and government benefits by offering people assistance in killing themselves (MAID) to denying people who having embraced one or more of the letters of the alphabet soup, had a bad trip, the help they are seeking in getting free, deserves to be classified with the peccata clamantia. It took a lot of pain and effort for this country to finally rid herself of the evil Section 13 hate speech provision that Captain Airhead’s father had saddled us with in the Canadian Human Rights Act. Captain Airhead must not be allowed to get away with reversing that.
It is about time that he took a walk in the snow. Or got badly trounced in a Dominion election. Or fell screaming into a portal to the netherworld that opened up beneath his feet. Any of these ways works.
The time is come. The time is now. Just go. Go. GO! I don’t care how. Captain Airhead, would you please go now?! (3)
(1) Anyone who thinks the allegations were proven needs to learn the difference between evidence and proof. Evidence is what is brought forward to back up a claim. Proof is what establishes the truth of a claim. That the evidence advanced for the allegations in question simply does not add up to proof and moreover was flimsy from the onset and has subsequently been largely debunked is an entirely valid viewpoint the expression of which is in danger of being outlawed by the bill under discussion. In a court of criminal law the burden is upon the prosecutor to prove the charge(s) against the defendant. Not merely to present evidence but to prove the accused to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The same standard must be applied to allegations made against historical figures and past generations. They, after all, are not present to defend themselves against their accusers. To fail to do so is to fail in our just duty towards those who have gone before us. The ancients had a term for this failure. It is the vice of impiety.
(2) The folly of legislation against hate was best expressed by Auberon Waugh in an article entitled “Che Guevara in the West Midlands” that was first published in the 6 July, 1976 issue of The Spectator, and later included in the collection Brideshead Benighted (Toronto: Little, Brown & Company, 1986). Michael Wharton, however, writing as “Peter Simple” was second to none, not even Waugh, in ridiculing this sort of thing.– Gerry T, Neal
Maxime Bernier Celebrates Huge Success of the 1 Million March 4 ChildrenThe line in the sand has been drawn
This week’s protests against radical gender ideology were an amazing success!
Far left extremists can try and transform our society, but indoctrinating our children crosses a line.
On Wednesday, the 1 Million March 4 Children saw tens of thousands of concerned Canadians take to the streets in cities across the country!
Canadians of every religion, background, and age proudly marched together. Chants of “no more silence” and “leave the kids alone” echoed through the streets.
I was in Ottawa where the turnout was amazing! 10 thousand people by my estimate. By far the biggest protest we’ve seen since the Freedom Convoy.
The protest in Toronto saw a similar turnout, and the support for the PPC was obvious!
And that was just the tip of the iceberg! Thousands more came out in Saskatoon, Vancouver, Halifax Montreal, and many more cities from coast to coast!
It was a beautiful day that helped restore my faith in Canada. But that was just the start of the week!
On Friday, I joined my friends Josh Alexander and Billboard Chris in Toronto for their second Education Over Indoctrination protest.
Hundreds showed up to continue to push back against radical gender ideology, far outnumbering violent ANTIFA counter-protestors.
As the lunch bell rang, students poured out of school and joined in our protest, it was beautiful to see!
A common question at both protests was: Where is Pierre Poilievre?
Despite his grassroots supporters passing a resolution rejecting gender ideology at the CPC policy convention just weeks earlier, Poilievre refused to support or even acknowledge these important protests.
In fact, he issued a memo to all of his MPs requiring them not to speak to the media or even post on social media about either of the protests!
The truth is, Poilievre does not want to speak about this issue.
He does not care about what the organizers and volunteers in his party want.
He does not care about the overwhelming grassroots movements growing.
He does not care about doing what is right.
He only cares about one thing: power, and his out-of-touch leadership team is too afraid of losing support from leftists in big cities or smears from the mainstream media to take a stand on this issue.
He won’t take any risk to defend parents and children.
He will continue to do the bare minimum on this issue, saying as little as possible and only when forced to.
But do you trust him to do anything about it if he were to win power?
I sure don’t.
I have been speaking out against radical gender ideology for years now, and I don’t plan to stop anytime soon.
Not until the medical transition of minors is made illegal!
This is the biggest child abuse scandal in our nation’s history. The mainstreaming of gender ideology is having a profound impact on a generation of children, the full impact of which we won’t know for years to come.
I will continue to defend the rights of parents and the innocence of children.
I don’t care what the media says about me. I don’t care what downtown Toronto leftists think of me.
This is the right thing to do and it is a battle I will fight until the end.
A society that doesn’t protect the innocence of children is lost.
“Christine Anderson’s views are vile and have no place in our politics. The MPs were not aware of this visiting Member of the European Parliament’s opinions, and they regret meeting with her,” says the statement.
“Frankly, it would be better if Anderson never visited Canada in the first place. She and her racist, hateful views are not welcome here.”
“Christine Anderson’s views are vile and have no place in our politics. The MPs were not aware of this visiting Member of the European Parliament’s opinions, and they regret meeting with her,” says the statement.
“Frankly, it would be better if Anderson never visited Canada in the first place. She and her racist, hateful views are not welcome here.”
Pathetic Pierre Poilievre denounces visiting German politician, Christine Anderson. The usual anti-free speech suspects were having a canniption after three Tory MPs met and had dinner with visiting Member of the European Parliament Christine Anderson a member of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) Party. She’s a firebrand who speaks perfect English. Why shouldn’t MPs meet with foreign politicians of whatever stripe. How are we going to know what they think, if we don’t talk to them.
Nevertheless, Poilievre was right on board with shunning. His office issued a statement bristling with hostility: “Christine Anderson’s views are vile and have no place in our politics. The MPs were not aware of this visiting Member of the European Parliament’s opinions, and they regret meeting with her,” says the statement.”Frankly, it would be better if Anderson never visited Canada in the first place. She and her racist, hateful views are not welcome here.” (CBC. February 24, 2023)
So, seeking to prevent your country from being swamped by radically different aliens are “vile, … racist and hateful views”? Poilievre has shown himself ready to kowtow ti minority interess that have tried to limit what are acceptable views for decades. He is, of course, a big immigration man and massive immigration, as we’ve seen it for the past 40 years, means the replacement of Canada’s European founding/settler people.
Interestingly, one of the three MPs who met with Christine Anderson was Leslyn Lewis (Haldimand – Norfolk) who is Black and presumably would have known if MEP Anderson was “vile” hateful and racist”!
And you still think this career politician, obviously beholden to minority lobbyists like the Centre for Israel & Jewish Affairs & the free speech hating Canadian Anti-Hate Network, is an alternative?
Poilievre condemns ‘vile’ views of German politician seen lunching with Conservative MPs
Fri, February 24, 2023 at 4:28 p.m. EST·6 min read
German politician Christine Anderson, centre, poses with a group that includes Niagara West MP Dean Allison (fourth from right), Oshawa MP Colin Carrie (third from left) and Haldimand–Norfolk MP Leslyn Lewis (fourth from left). (Twitter – image credit)
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre is attempting to distance his party from a far-right German politician whose views have been condemned as hateful and racist, and who was photographed lunching with three Conservative MPs earlier this week.
Christine Anderson, a member of the European Parliament with Germany’s Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party, is on a cross-Canada tour that ends tonight in Montreal.
On Tuesday, photos emerged online showing Anderson at a restaurant with a group that included three Conservative MPs — Niagara West MP Dean Allison, Oshawa MP Colin Carrie and Haldimand–Norfolk MP Leslyn Lewis.
The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, which describes itself as an advocate for Jewish federations across Canada, condemned the gathering, tweeting Thursday that it had raised the issue with the Conservative Party of Canada.
Anderson’s views ‘not welcome here’
On Friday, Sebastian Skamski, director of media relations for the Opposition leader’s office, issued a statement attributed to Poilievre:
“Christine Anderson’s views are vile and have no place in our politics. The MPs were not aware of this visiting Member of the European Parliament’s opinions, and they regret meeting with her,” says the statement.
“Frankly, it would be better if Anderson never visited Canada in the first place. She and her racist, hateful views are not welcome here.”
Poilievre’s office issued a separate statement attributed to the three MPs who were photographed with Anderson.
“It is, of course, not uncommon for members of Parliament to meet with visiting elected officials from other countries. During a visit, we recently met with an elected representative of the European Parliament while she was in Canada,” said the statement.
“We were not aware of the views or associations of her and her political party. We do not share or endorse her views and strongly condemn any views that are racist or hateful.”
Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson said on Tuesday that may lose his license unless he submits to mandatory “social-media communication retraining” by the College of Psychologists of Ontario, his home province’s licensing authority.
“I face public disgrace, mandatory political re-education, disciplinary hearing and potential loss of my clinical licensing for agreeing with [Conservative MP] Pierre Poilievre and criticizing our standing [Prime Minister] Justin Trudeau,” Peterson said on Twitter.
According to Peterson, “about a dozen people from all over the world” submitted complaints to the CPO, alleging his views and comments “harmed people.” None of them were actual clients of his, but lied about it so their complaints would be accepted, he added.
“If I comply, the terms of my re-education and my punishment will be announced publicly,” he said.
“Canadians: your physicians, lawyers, psychologists and other professionals are now so intimidated by their commissar overlords that they fear to tell you the truth. This means that your care and legal counsel has been rendered dangerously unreliable,” Peterson tweeted.
Peterson was reinstated on Twitter in November, after Elon Musk bought the company and reversed many prior bans that he thought unjust. He had been locked out of his account in July 2022, for refusing to use a transgender actor’s new name and pronouns.
On December 27, Peterson tweeted that Trudeau “appears to me to be perpetually 14 yrs old,” referring to the concept of “psychological age” in his field of expertise.
The psychologist first gained national and international attention in 2016, when he was subjected to similar “re-education” pressure over his criticism of a bill that declared “gender identity and expression” to be protected categories. More recently, he has denounced the “totalitarian” lockdowns and vaccine mandates embraced by many countries – including Canada – in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. (Russia Today, January 3, 2023)
A Powerful Open Letter to Pierre Poilievre on Free Speech — Hope He Takes it to Heart
Dear Pierre,
I hope you are keeping well. The rights of Canadians to freely hold and express beliefs are being eroded at an alarming speed under the Trudeau government. Some of its recent decisions even require that Canadians renounce their most deeply held moral convictions and express opinions they disagree with.
In 2018, the Liberal government denied summer job funding to organizations, including charities, that would not sign an attestation supporting abortion. It also passed bill C-16 as part of a trend to force Canadians to express support for the existence of various gender identities beyond the biological categories of male and female, and to use pronouns demanded by those who identify with these other genders.
In addition to these assaults on conscience, the government launched a series of regulatory attacks on free speech on the internet and is pressuring social media companies, which are already censoring speech that isn’t politically correct, to crack down even more. It is also considering bringing back Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. This hate speech provision was repealed by the Conservative government in 2013 because it was being used arbitrarily to censor statements that offended some people on the internet.
In what appears to be a first step towards restricting our right to criticize some religions, it adopted M-103, a motion that condemns religious discrimination but only specifically mentions one religion, Islam, and without defining the term “islamophobia.”
Finally, on university campuses, a growing number of faculty and administrators—those who should be fighting for open debate of controversial ideas—have become aggressive advocates for censorship.
History and social scientific research show that freedom of conscience and freedom of expression, when maximally protected, advance the intellectual life of a nation, foster greater ideological diversity and societal understanding, and nurture other freedoms necessary for a successful democracy.
This is why Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees citizens freedom of conscience and religion, as well as freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication.
What some people find politically incorrect, offensive or even hateful cannot serve as the legal basis for discrimination and censorship. Canadians should be able to enjoy maximum freedom of conscience and expression as guaranteed in Section 2 of the Charter.
As the presumed front runner in the 2022 Conservative Party of Canada leadership election, as well as an individual who claims to support individual liberty and personal freedom, I believe that you should commit to publicly supporting the following policies:
Restrict the definition of hate speech in the Criminal Code to expression which explicitly advocates the use of force against identifiable groups or persons based on protected criteria such as religion, race, ethnicity, sex, or sexual orientation.
Repeal any existing legislation or regulation curtailing free speech on the internet and prevent the reinstatement of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Repeal C-16, M-103, C-10, and C-36. Ensure that Canadians can exercise their freedom of conscience to its fullest extent as it is intended under the Charter and are not discriminated against because of their moral convictions.
Repeal Section 319 of the Criminal Code of Canada.
Withhold federal funding from any post-secondary institution shown to be violating the freedom of expression of its students or faculty.
Safety Minister Marco Mendicino has been lying to Canadians for months about the Emergencies Act One of Trudeau’s ministers has been lying to Canadians for months now on the invocation of the Emergencies Act.
He has claimed the RCMP and Ottawa Police requested it, which we now know is a complete lie.
Pierre Poilievre has demanded that Mendicino resign from cabinet immediately given the magnitude of these lies and that they resulted in the oppression of innocent Canadians.
Please go to FireTheLiar.ca and sign our petition as soon as possible so we can put continued pressure on him to resign. Someone must be held accountable for what this government is doing. Keep fighting for what is right,
