A Manitoba Taxpayer Asks Will Taxpayers Be Silenced & Not Allowed To Examine Kamloops Claims

Dear Wab and Dan

Premier Wab Kinew

Daniel Blaikie  Advisor to the Premier

Re: above link

Veracity and democracy.

Will the public be  denied  a fair hearing and full examination with fully informed individuals concerning the physical remains of the 215 bodies alleged to be in the ground at the Kamloops Residential School? 

Will the public be forced by government into believing something they are  denied   from witnessing and sent to jail for asking to see what is  denied  to them?

Do the following words sound familiar Wab?  These are your recent words immediately below:

“I think the election results in B.C. should concern every elected politician and every consultant out there for this reason.  It’s a reminder that what we’re doing is not a game.  When you’re elected to serve the people of your province or your country…it is a serious responsibility that isn’t to be played with.  And…there’s no partisanship in these comments.  It’s all about reminding people that we have a serious obligation to take our democracy and our duties to the utmost care”.

Is it “democracy” when elected government politicians and non-elected consultants make a claim (215 alleged buried bodies, and much more) and refuse to qualify the claim with full disclosure of proven evidence with informed individuals across Canada? 

Is it democracy when elected politicians seek to imprison people for asking to see proof and evidence of claims made by elected politicians while  denying  the public full evidence of claims? 

Are you, Wab, being “partisan” when siding with a movement that  denies  the public proof of claims and siding with a movement that refuses to engage in full public disclosure of claims (of 215 alleged bodies buried in a Kamloops Residential school, and much more)? 

Do you, Wab, believe that you can  deny  full public discussion of Residential schools and alleged buried bodies by publicly using politically expedient and politically divisive words like “racism” and “denialism”?

Do you not think that every other elected politician and the public who voted for these politicians should have concern for their province and country when politicians and consultants make claims (215 alleged buried bodies, and much more) and  deny  proof of claims that costs the public their taxes? 

Where is the serious obligation and care to the public while  denying  the public their right to witness the evidence for claims (215 alleged buried bodies, and much more) made by selected and elected politicians and consultants paid with publicly generated money (taxes)?

Thank you for your attention.

Y T

mike brentnall