End the Lockdown Protest draws 125 in Vancouver.

A report by Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFAxfbyZWl0&feature=youtu.be
End the Lockdown Protest draws 125 in Vancouver.

A report by Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFAxfbyZWl0&feature=youtu.be

Despite the “conspiracy theory” in question literally being true.
on 16 April, 2020

A CBC News report gives kids advice on how to shut down “conspiracy theories” voiced by their parents about coronavirus being created by China in a lab.
Because apparently that’s the media’s job now.
The presenter laments how somebody’s Dad may drop a message into chat blaming China for “manufacturing the coronavirus” with a “link to a site you’ve never heard of” (translation – a link that’s not, God forbid, mainstream media).
The piece then features a woman from a group that combats “misinformation online” who urges the son or daughter not to get confrontational with their Dad but to accuse him of being accurate and stirring fear.
At one point in the piece, the reporter even suggests that conspiracy theories can be “just as dangerous as a virus.”
“Maybe send an article from a legitimate source quoting credible scientists on why the virus wasn’t manufactured,” states the host.
The suggested article unsurprisingly comes from the CBC and is entitled ‘No, the new coronavirus wasn’t created in a lab, scientists say.’
In reality, as Fox News sources confirmed last night, the coronavirus was indeed leaked from a laboratory in Wuhan, so to say it was “manufactured” isn’t even much of a stretch. The virus was literally created in a lab.
The irony of all this of course is that virtually nobody trusts the mainstream media, so when they attack conspiracy theories it just makes more people believe them.
When social media giants then get involved to censor information about the same conspiracy theories, that also bolsters the notion that they’re accurate because powerful interests are trying to stifle them.
Take the news report below as an example.

Frederick,
Today is Earth Day. More than just Earth Day, it’s the 50th Anniversary of the very first Earth Day.
That means that environmentalists, celebrities, and especially environmentalist celebrities, are celebrating by scolding the rest of us for living on the Earth and for not being as virtuous as they are.
And make no mistake, if you’re not on board with their radical, leftist, anti-life, unscientific climate-alarmist, ideological agenda, approved with great enthusiasm by the UN—and the WHO—you are not as virtuous as they are. Or so they say.
You’ll hear them screaming the same things this year that they said last year, and you’ll hear them say those things again next year. You can’t say they aren’t committed to recycling.
I, too, am celebrating Earth Day today, albeit in a slightly different manner.
I’m celebrating Earth Day by recognizing the wonderful countries that make up this earth, especially the country of Canada! I celebrate by proudly standing for Canadian sovereignty. As Prime Minister:
I am also celebrating Earth Day by recognizing the families that make up our beloved Canada (and every other country on Earth) and the integrity of the invincible family unit, always besieged by corrosive leftist social ideas. The family is the irreplaceable fundamental building block of every free society. As Prime Minister:
Finally, I am celebrating Earth Day by standing up for freedom in our country and in our party. As Prime Minister:
Earth Day is far too important to be left exclusively to those who love the planet but hate the wonderful human beings who live here.
Do you agree, Frederick?

Happy Earth Day, everyone! Be fruitful and multiply!
And please be careful! Wear a mask when in public until we are through this COVID-19 pandemic.
Sincerely,

Derek Sloan Member of Parliament https://www.dereksloan.ca

Another Week of Fewer Freedoms
by Wendy Shepherd of Truth North April 12, 2020 Duration of vide is 5 minutes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=73hGbA99WJo

A Criminal Offence of Knowingly Spreading Misinformation about the Coronavirus – A Video With Paul Fromm
https://www.bitchute.com/video/uzU8an1sbdJH/
Paul Fromm warns us about the Canadian Liberal
Party considering making it a Criminal Offence to Knowingly Spread
Misinformation about just the coronavirus or what?
Paul has been the Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression since 1983.
CAFE is dedicated to Free Speech, Immigration Reform, and Restoring
Political Sanity. The website can be found at http://cafe.nfshost.com
Paul is also the Director of the Canada First Immigration Reform Committee at: http://canadafirst.nfshost.com/
Paul lives in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada and you can contact him at
paul@paulfromm.com .
He has been an active leader on the Canadian right for 50 years and has a steel trap memory so he is a treasure and resource of information and history.

In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.” – Rudyard Kipling
The way the World Health Organization, our power-hungry politicians, the
technocratic boobs with tunnel vision who are our health apparatchiks,
and the cheap harlots of the mainstream media talk about it, one would
think that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a real life equivalent of the
artificially engineered, antibody resistant, superflu which wipes out
most of the world’s population in Stephen King’s 1978 novel The Stand
and the various adaptations thereof. It is not. Although it is
possible that like the weaponized flu strain in the novel, it escaped
from a laboratory, that of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, it is not
remotely comparable in terms of lethality. It is basically a normal
strain of bat influenza that has jumped species to humans, that has been
spreading rapidly due to it being new to the species and thus our
having no built up immunity to it yet, but most people are not at risk
of anything worse than the ordinary flu from it. Those who are most
susceptible to developing the severe and potentially lethal form of
pneumonia that it can produce are the same people susceptible to
catching pneumonia and dying from H1N1 and the other, ordinary, seasonal
strains of the flu.
From the beginning of this pandemic it has been apparent that the WHO’s
claims with regards to the lethality of this virus have been greatly
exaggerated. Although the press in its daily reports has used
“staggering” and similar scare words to describe the rising death tolls,
the numbers themselves have not supported the use of such adjectives.
Not when taken in context at any rate. COVID-19 has not become the
leading cause of death, it is nowhere close to it. The overall number
of deaths from all causes for the period of this pandemic has not risen
astronomically in comparison with the number for the same period in
other years. Indeed, in some areas that have been particularly hard
hit by COVID-19 this number has been down from recent years.
In most countries, the epidemiologists’ original projections of expected
deaths from this disease have been radically revised downward. At
some point the mortality rate will have to undergo a similar radical
adjustment. Contrary to the lies of the health authorities and the
media, the official death count for COVID-19 is not too low but too
high. Even though the vast majority of people who have caught this
virus and died have had multiple other conditions that also contributed
to their demise these have all been classified as deaths from COVID-19.
If deaths from regular influenza were counted the same way the
mortality rate for the flu would be much higher than it is. Similarly,
the other number that goes into the mortality rate calculation is much
too low. Since a large number – as many as fifty percent some
estimates put it – of those who contract the virus are completely
asymptomatic, the total number known to have been infected is obviously
much, much, lower than the true number of infected. Indeed, when we
consider that international travel in and out of Hubei province was
allowed long after the initial outbreak began there – and long after Red
China shut down travel from that province to the rest of their own
country – during a period in which Western countries, sick with a
liberalism far more lethal than this virus, resisted imposing travel
restrictions on China, it is almost certain that the virus had made it
into all of our countries long before we noticed that it had arrived.
Since the potential lethality of this virus has been hugely exaggerated,
the extent to which the repugnant, totalitarian, Communistic measures
being taken almost everywhere are “saving lives” is also exaggerated.
In pointing this out I do not wish merely to throw water on those
currently engaged in a nauseating orgy of self-congratulatory,
backslapping, tripe over their efforts to save lives by sacrificing our
freedoms, but to contrast the low number of lives saved with the
potentially much higher number of lives endangered by the same measures.
While I am no fan of Karl Marx – Groucho is much more my style – and am
of the firm opinion that he was wrong about almost everything, there are
a few rare exceptions to this. One such exception was the sentence
with which he opened his letter to Louis Kugelmann on July 11, 1868.
He wrote “Every child knows a nation which ceased to work, I will not
say for a year, but even for a few weeks, would perish.” With this
sentence he introduces an argument that is neither interesting nor
relevant to the subject at hand, but the sentence itself states an
obvious truth, one very similar to that which is found in the verses by
Rudyard Kipling quoted at the beginning of this essay.
The Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus continues to be remembered to this
day for his theory about population size and the food supply. Human
beings, Malthus argued, can increase our food supply through improved
means of production, but if we do so the natural human response will be
an increase in reproduction. The increase in reproduction will be
faster and larger than the increase in food production so that the
growth in population size will exceed the increase to the food supply
and as a result there will be famine, poverty, starvation, disease and
death. His essay on the Principle of Population was first
published in 1798. He expanded and revised it in 1803, and published
several further editions with minor revisions before his death in 1834.
From that day to this, it has inspired several prophecies of doom, the
most famous of recent times being the 1968 bestseller The Population Bomb
by Stanford University’s Paul Ehrlich which predicted that hundreds of
millions of people would die in the 1970s from starvation due to
overpopulation. That, of course, did not happen.
There is obviously a flaw somewhere in Malthus’ theory. The question
is where. According to the popular Demographic Transition Model, first
developed by Warren Thomson in 1929, the problem is with his
understanding of human nature. According to this theory, as societies
progress towards industrialization they pass through stages and, after
they have achieved a certain level of industrial development, fertility
rates drop drastically and population size stabilizes. While the
demographic history of Western countries and other developed countries
such as Japan in the twentieth century would seem to bear this
interpretation out, explaining its having passed into conventional
wisdom, it has not gone without challenge. Dr. Virginia Deane
Abernethy of Vanderbilt University, for example, in her book Population Politics
(Transaction Books, 2000) gave several examples of empirical evidence
that goes against the theory, making the case that popular late
twentieth century progressive efforts to combat Third World
overpopulation and poverty with policies based upon the assumption of
the DTM, such as foreign relief and liberal immigration to the West as a
population safety valve, have not worked as the model would have
predicted but have, if anything, made the problem worse. The sharp
decline in fertility that developed countries have experienced since the
end of the post-World War II Baby Boom is better explained by other
aspects of the transition to modernity, such as a severe weakening of
the traditional idea that producing posterity is a duty we owe to our
ancestors, than by industrial prosperity itself.
The other leading explanation of the flaw in Malthus’ theory is that he
vastly underestimated our capacity to improve and increase the food
supply. This explanation is also borne out by the history of the
twentieth century and much more consistently than that of the DTM.
Now, if this explanation of what went wrong with the predictions based
upon Malthus’ theory is the correct one, and I believe it is, then what
could potentially happen when we have a global population of 7.8 billion
people and we shut down the economy all over the world, jeopardizing
out ability to produce food at this improved and increased capacity?
Why, lo and behold, we have just discovered where the potential for a
death rate as a high as the one in Stephen King’s book is to be found.
Yes, shutting down the economies of practically every country in the
world, is indeed a move that will put the food supply in jeopardy.
When those who produce and sell food are almost the only ones allowed to
be open they are essentially being asked or told to work for nothing,
for nobody else is producing anything with which to pay them. Yes,
governments are printing and handing out fiat money by the gazillions,
but money has no intrinsic value. Its role in the marketplace is to be
a convenient stand-in for real goods. The X number of dollars that
you pay someone for Y amount of magic beans, represents the cow that you
would have traded in a barter exchange. Perhaps that is a bad
example, because both beans and cattle are sources of food, but I think
it still gets the point across. If only category of producers are
allowed to actually produce anything for sale in the market, the
currency that is exchanged in that market will rapidly become worthless,
and those producers will become overburdened and start to fail. It
is estimated that nine million people in the world die from hunger every
year. It is responsible for half of the deaths of children under the
age of five. This is over three times the number of people known to
have been infected with COVID-19. It is about fifty times more than
the number who have died after contracting the virus. As of this
writing, the number who have died from hunger in 2020 so far is almost
three million. That’s about fifteen times the number who have died
after contracting COVID-19, whether the virus was the primary killer or
not. The measures being taken to combat COVID-19 will drive the number
who die from hunger up and by considerably more than they can bring the
number who die from COVID-19 down.
There are those who would say that this is the intentional and
deliberate true purpose of the global lockdown. I would not go that
far. The problem with the interpretation of events as being the
intended outcome of a very powerful and malevolent cabal is that it
requires assuming that politicians, bureaucrats, technocrats, and the
like possess an almost superhuman level of competence. In reality,
these are people who think they are Sherlock Holmes, when they are
actually Jacques Clouseau – the Jacques Clouseau portrayed by Peter
Sellers in Blake Edwards’ Pink Panther films, not the version of the
character more recently portrayed by Steve Martin. Unlike the latter,
who is able to scrape together enough deductive reasoning to actually
solve the case by the end of his movies, Sellers’ classic
interpretation of this character was of a bumbling, clumsy, nincompoop
whose incompetence is matched only by his vanity and arrogance, and who
succeeds only through an extraordinary degree of sheer accidental luck.
That having been said, large scale global depopulation has been one of
the chief goals of the environmentalist wing of the United Nations and
its ultrawealthy backers like Bill Gates, George Soros, and the late
Maurice Strong since at least the 1992 “Earth Summit” at Rio de Janeiro
that produced the famous – or, depending upon your perspective, infamous
– action plan “Agenda 21.” These people represent the most extreme
version of one of the two distortions of Malthus that have been around
since his own day. While his detractors, like Victorian novelist
Charles Dickens, unjustly accused him of heartlessly wishing upon people
the famine, poverty, and death his theory predicted, his supporters,
especially those of more recent times, have advocated measures to combat
overpopulation that he himself would have found morally repugnant, such
as abortion, infanticide, and totalitarian state control of
reproduction. Those who want the world’s population reduced by as much
as eighty to ninety-five percent are the worst example of this sort.
The overlap between the institutions such as the United Nations and
individuals such as Bill Gates who advocate this radical agenda and
those behind the global lockdown is certainly worth taking note of.
Whether intentional or merely the result of the kind of stupidity that
is the unique property of technocratic experts – “I had no idea my
solution to Problem X would create the much worse Problem Y because that
is not my field of expertise” – the potential lethality of the measures
being taken to combat COVID-19, far exceeds that of the disease itself.
Posted by
Gerry T. Neal
at
6:14 AM
Labels:
Agenda 21,
Bill Gates,
Blake Edwards,
COVID-19,
George Soros,
Groucho Marx,
Karl Marx,
Maurice Strong,
Paul Ehrlich,
Peter Sellers,
Rudyard Kipling,
Stephen King,
Thomas Robert Malthus,
Virginia Deane Abernethy

Trevor Fleming is the latest free speech victim and victim of corporate cowardice. This Lululemon executive posted a link on Instagram to California artist Jess Sluder who designed a T-shirt featuring “bat fried rice.” Lululemon promptly fired him. The shirt’s a joke but the likely source of the Coronavirus pandemic were live bats kept at a filthy Wuhan wet market.

Laura-Lynn Tyler-Thompson covers the STOP THE LOCKDOWN citizens protest at Vancouver City Hall, April 17.
Dear Reader,
Being
a book collector for many years I also have amassed a substantial
number of MSM Newspapers over past decades. This front page story in
British Columbia’s “Province” newspaper from October 21, 1999 is a prime
example of what we’re now going through globally as the controlled
media finally was able to come up with the Mother of all “viruses” story
in their attempt to terrorize and scare the shit out of everyone on the
planet.
Over
twenty-one years ago they were already predicting a potential 51,000
deaths from a “predicted” global pandemic that could only be prevented
with a “new flu vaccine, made from fertilized chicken eggs.” We can see
now that the Gates’s and the WHO and the Fauci’s of the world have come a
long way from “fertilized chicken eggs”!
One
of the more unsettling things about this massive hoax is how so many of
the population, for whatever reasons, are refusing to question the
narrative and simply succumbing to “social distancing” and “face masks”
and all the rest of the Orwellian regulations being set in place by the
criminals behind this incredible scam. Those working in the shadows
appear to have judged the make-up of the masses fairly well – at least
for the moment.
How
long it will take before the resistance begins to manifest is anyone’s
guess. In the interim time I suggest that folks get out their old, worn
copies of The Monkey Wrench Gang and do a little refresher reading.
Feel
free to share this story if you wish. I’m not under any “bail
conditions” at this time and who knows when the courts will be returning
to work.
Continue to Question Authority and fight for Justice and Freedom,
Sincerely,
Arthur TophamPub/EdThe Radical Press“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”———-
51,000 of us coulddie in the flu pandemic
A top health official says up to 51,000 Canadians could die in a
global flu outbreak predicted to hit within 10 years if Canada can’t
quickly mass-produce a vaccine.
“We estimate that, if there’s not a vaccine available, that the next
pandemic will cause between 9,000 and 51,000 deaths in Canada,” Dr. John
Spika, director of infectious diseases at Health Canada’s Laboratory
Centre for Disease Control in Ottawa, said last night. “Obviously, one doesn’t want to be fear-mongering, but at the same time it’s something that one needs to prepare for.”
The prediction of a pandemic influenza outbreak sweeping the globe
within the next decade is based on data showing three to four flu
pandemics – each with a new virus to which no one has immunity – hit the
world every 100 years. Pandemics
occurred in 1892, 1918, 1957 and 1968. The pandemic of 1918-19 is
believed to have killed up to 40 million. The relatively mild virus of
the 1968 pandemic killed about 4,000 Canadians.
It’s estimated such a virus would take about three months to spread
to Canada from wherever it originates. The first peak of the disease
hitting the population would happen two to four months later. It takes a minimum of three months to produce the first lot of any new flu vaccine, made from fertilized chicken eggs.
So the virus would be infecting Canadians long before there was
enough vaccine to inoculate the entire population. It would take 10
months, using current vaccine production measures to vaccinate all
Canadians. Dr. Allison McGreer, director of infection control at Toronto’s Mount Sinai Hospital, asked:
“Do we really want to have 16 million fertilized eggs on hand at all
times, or is there some way we’re willing to take a little bit of hit
and not spend as much money up front?
“If we thought that the 1918-19 flu pandemic was around the corner,
then we would be right to be terrified, but that’s not likely to
happen.”– Southam News