The Hate Crime Purging Of “Antisemites” Is Underway!

The Hate Crime Purging Of “Antisemites” Is Underway! by Philip Giraldi

Saying anything about Israel’s misbehavior can send you to jail

June 20, 2023


Philip Giraldi Archive: https://earthnewspaper.com/category/philip-m-giraldi-phd

There have recently been a number of incidents that would be of interest if one has concerns about the sorry state of free speech in Europe and the United States, the so-called “democracies” who tend to boast about their freedoms and the rights of their citizens. The chosen weapon in the US and elsewhere in the Anglo-sphere has been the designation “hate speech” which also covers “hate writing,” “possessing hate literature or films,” and even “hate thinking.” In Europe, where “hate speech” is often referred to using the English words, the expression is often preceded by the word “illegal” to make sure that the point about consequences is made and the potential penalty is clearly understood. Some Europeans have in fact been convicted and sent to prison when they have falsely believed they were exercising free speech.

Though the “hate” designation was originally coined to discourage racist language and other forms of expression it has increasingly been exploited by Israel and its associated Jewish support groups to criminalize any criticism of Israel or of Jewish group behavior. It has extended its reach by moving into subsets, notably “holocaust denial” and “antisemitism” which are also regarded ipso facto as hate crimes in a context in which Jews are always regarded as victims, never as perpetrators of violence.

Much of what is going on might be described in fairly simple terms: Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians and its unprovoked lethal attacks on its neighbors might reasonably be described as “deplorable” or even genocidal in the case of the Palestinians. Beyond that, Israel, which pretends to be a democracy, operates a system of control over the Christian and Muslim minority within its own borders and also in the area it illegally occupies that is describable as “apartheid,” where the minority is compelled to accept limited resources and consistently harsh treatment from the dominant Jewish population. More to the point, the extremist government coalition headed by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has made the situation even worse for those non-Jews that it controls, with talk of introducing mass expulsions and imprisonments. The death toll of Palestinians at the hands of the Israel Defense Forces has also been going up, with more than 150 Palestinians killed this year, including 26 children.

To be sure, Israel has become a home for Jews that can no longer tolerate anyone else. Some ministers in the new government are particularly vile in their views but it is to be assumed that Netanyahu and others in his administration are genuinely supportive of turning Israel into a truly and even exclusively Jewish state, which is in fact how it legally defines itself. The one minister most cited for his cruelty and racism is Itamar Ben-Gvir of the Jewish Power party. Ben-Gvir has been charged with crimes 50 times, and convicted on eight occasions, including once for support of a Jewish terrorist group. He is a former supporter of the now deceased right wing fanatic Meir Kahane, and, like Kahane, envisions an Israel that is as Palestinian free as possible and centered exclusively on Jewish interests. He has called for deporting Arabs who aren’t loyal to a Jewish Israel, annexing all of the West Bank and exercising full Israeli sovereignty over the Temple Mount, where the Muslim venerated Al-Aqsa mosque is located. He supports legislation defying international agreements to “divide” the Al-Aqsa site to permit regular Jewish worshippers and there have even been suggestions that the Israeli government will seek to rebuild the so-called Biblical Second Temple, destroyed in the First Century by the Romans, in that location.

Ben-Gvir is notorious for his provocations directed against Palestinian Muslims and Christians. He has led marches of armed settlers flaunting Israeli flags through Arab quarters of cities and towns and has even brought settlers and other extremists to the al-Aqsa mosque during Ramadan and to interrupt Friday prayers. To cap the irony, he has been since November 2022 the National Security Minister, which gives him authority over the police, to include the so-called Border Police as well as the police forces located on the illegally occupied West Bank. Indeed, as a practical matter, Ben-Gvir is seeking to have the Knesset pass legislation explicitly conferring legal immunity on all Israeli soldiers for any and all killings of Palestinians. He has also pressed the parliament to institute a formal, judicially administered death penalty for “terrorists”, which would mean any Palestinian who physically resists the Israeli occupation.

Another extremist who has obtained a major ministry in the Netanyahu government is Bezalel Yoel Smotrich who has served as the Minister of Finance since 2022. He has recently completed a controversial trip to the United States where he met with American Zionist leaders. Smotrich is the leader of the Religious Zionist Party, and lives in an illegal settlement in a house within the Israeli occupied West Bank that was also built doubly illegally outside the settlement proper. Smotrich supports expanding Israeli settlements in the West Bank, opposes any form of Palestinian statehood, and even denies the existence of the Palestinian people. He demands a state judiciary that relies only on Torah and Jewish traditional law. Accused of inciting hatred against Arab Israelis, he told Arab Israeli lawmakers in October 2021, that “it’s a mistake that David Ben-Gurion didn’t finish the job and didn’t throw all of you out in 1948.”

The increasing brutality of the Israeli government and its security forces have produced a reaction among many observers worldwide, so the supporters of Israel have engaged in their own first strike frequently using the “hate crime” weapon. They have basically turned the hate crime legislation to their advantage by convincing many nations to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of the “hate crime” antisemitism to automatically include criticism of Israel as being equivalent to hatred of Jews. When that doesn’t work the powerful Israel lobby can also resort to much more brutal threats. When Iceland sought to make illegal infant circumcision five years ago, regarding it as genital mutilation performed on an unconsenting child, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) threatened to unleash Jewish power to destroy their economy and international reputation as punishment for making their country “inhospitable to Jews.”

Now that the “hate crime” genie together with the associated links to holocaust denial and antisemitism have been released from the bottle, they are being used regularly to silence anyone who even indirectly criticizes prominent Jews like George Soros. Conservatives including Tucker Carlson and Elon Musk have recently been on the receiving end of the antisemitism label after referring to Soros and his “Globalist” agenda. It is my belief that Tucker was fired at least in part due to Jewish pressure on FOX as he had been very critical of groups like the hysterical ADL and its hideous director Jonathan Greenblatt.

Roger Waters, the former lead singer of Pink Floyd, has emerged as a powerful critic of Israeli treatment of the Palestinians. As a consequence, he has been hounded by authorities in Europe, has had his concerts canceled, and has been threatened with legal action to make him shut up. The Biden Administration’s antisemitism Czar Deborah Lipstadt has also attacked him, saying “I wholeheartedly concur with [an online] condemnation of Roger Waters and his despicable Holocaust distortion.” She was referring to a tweet stating that “I am sick & disgusted by Roger Waters’ obsession to belittle and trivialize the Shoah & the sarcastic way in which he delights in trampling on the victims, systematically murdered by the Nazis. In Germany. Enough is enough. Holocaust trivialization is criminalized across the EU.” The State Department, speaking for the White House, then piled on adding that Waters has “a long track record of using antisemitic tropes” and a concert he gave late last month in Germany “contained imagery that is deeply offensive to Jewish people and minimized the Holocaust… The artist in question has a long track record of using antisemitic tropes to denigrate Jewish people.”

One might observe that the depiction of Waters is basically untrue – he is a critic of Israeli crimes against humanity but does not hate Jews. One might also add how the fact that the United States State Department actually has a Special Envoy to Combat Antisemitism speaks for itself and tells you exactly who is in charge in Washington. I wonder how much it costs to run Lipstadt’s mouth from a no doubt well-appointed office in Foggy Bottom each year? Maybe someone should do a cost/benefit analysis and give Debbie her walking papers.

Beyond that, several other recent stories show how it all often works in practice to confront and silence critics. Swedish pop star Zara Larsson is facing what is obviously a coordinated backlash on social media after criticizing Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. In an Instagram message to her 6.3 million followers, the 23-year-old declared the ongoing cross-border violence, which is killing mostly Arabs, was a “crime” against Palestinians. Her effort to be somewhat even handed was ignored, in the message, which she later deleted, where she wrote “We have to stand up for Jewish people all over the world facing anti-Semitic violence and threats, but we must also call out a state upholding apartheid and KILLING civilians, funded by American dollars.” She ended the message with the hashtag “#freepalestine.”

Larsson was hardly calling for targeting Jews or anything like that, but the reaction to her comment was symptomatic of the typical overkill response engaged in by Israel and its friends whenever anyone challenges the standard narrative of Israeli perpetual victimhood. Two other instances of comments about Israel leading to an overwhelming response to punish the perpetrators took place during the past month in the United States at college commencement ceremonies. The first was on May 12th, at a graduation ceremony for the law school of the City University of New York (CUNY), where Fatima Mousa Mohammed, a Queens native who was selected by the graduating 2023 class to speak during the May 12 ceremony, praised CUNY for supporting student activism, citing in particular the acceptance of student groups protesting against Israel’s brutality towards the Palestinians. She said “Israel continues to indiscriminately rain bullets and bombs on worshippers, murdering the old, the young and even attacking funerals and graveyards, as it encourages lynch mobs to target Palestinians homes and businesses. As it imprisons its children, as it continues its project of settler colonialism, expelling Palestinians from their homes. Silence is no longer acceptable.”

The response to Mohammed was immediate, including a scathing news report in the New York Post, a call by several Jewish groups to cut funding to CUNY and demands that the law school dean be fired. And the controversy again made news when a second student spoke out at a commencement at El Camino community college in Torrance California. Jana Abulaban, 18, strongly criticized Israeli government policies during her speech on June 9th.

Abulaban, who was born in Jordan in a family of Palestinian refugees, reportedly felt “inspired” by the speech of Fatima Mousa Mohammed and she told the audience “I gift my graduation to all Palestinians who have lost their life and those who continue to lose their lives every day due to the oppressive apartheid state of Israel killing and torturing Palestinians as we speak.’’

There was, of course an immediate reaction to the Abulaban speech coming from a variety of West Coast and New York pro-Israel sources. Brooke Goldstein, a claimed human-rights lawyer founder of The Lawfare Project, said, “This is yet one more example of the systemic Jew-hatred we’re seeing on our college campuses. When a student gives a commencement speech targeting Jews, trafficking in modern tropes of antisemitism, it’s clear that there has been a complete failure in that school to promote social justice for the Jewish people. If any other minority group were targeted like this, there would be consequences for the bigot. The Jewish community deserves no less.”

Of course, both women only spoke the truth about what is happening in the Middle East. Neither attacked the Jewish religion or Jews per se and only criticized Israel’s appalling behavior. When I last checked, Israel was a foreign country with both foreign and domestic policies that are considered very questionable by most of the world, so why should it be protected from being challenged in the United States? The two women were brave to speak up as they did, surely knowing that they would be targeted by the Jewish state’s many friends and supporters. Those of us who continue to speak out on Israel’s genocidal policies can likewise expect no less, particularly as both the federal as well as many state governments and also the media are now on a witch hunt directed against those who seek to speak the truth. But we must persevere. As Fatima Mousa Mohammed put it, “Silence is no longer acceptable.”

Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation (Federal ID Number #52-1739023) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Website is https://CouncilForTheNationalInterest.org, address is P.O. Box 2157, Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is inform@cnionline.org

Source: https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/the-hate-crime-purging-of-antisemites-is-underway

Subscribe To The EarthNewspaper.com Newsletter
https://EarthNewspaper.com/Subscribe

Support Honest, Independent, And Ad-Free News
https://EarthNewspaper.com/Donate

Freedom Rallies in the Okanagan, December 10-11 — Kelowna, Vernon, Oliver, Osoyoos, OK Falls, Kamloops, & Penticton; Trudeau Must Go Convoy, December 10

Click here to read in browser

Please forward

Rally’s and Events

“It Ain’t Over”

————————————–

Saturday, December 10, 2022

https://twitter.com/WallStreetSilv/status/1594918279801602049

————————————–

https://www.westernstandard.news/news/trudeau-threatens-a-return-to-restrictions-if-vaccine-uptake-doesnt-increase/article_fb3d9c94-4e3f-11ed-ab64-87edfe9f3649.html

Trudeau threatens a return to restrictions if vaccine uptake doesn’t increase

Oct. 17, 2022 – Western Standard

————————————–

Ontario’s top doctor urges mask wearing, warns mandate could return

Oct. 13, 2022 – Global News

————————————–

https://www.iheartradio.ca/580-cfra/news/time-to-wear-masks-once-again-ottawa-public-health-urges-1.18771473

November 9, 2022 CFRA 580 Ottawa

TIME TO WEAR MASKS ‘ONCE AGAIN,’ OTTAWA PUBLIC HEALTH URGES

The narrative is shifting now from restrictions to CONTROL & privacy violations – especially medical

Geoengineering Free Canada | Facebook

This group is to educate people and try to put a stop to the geoengineering and poisonous chemtrails they spray in our skies.


JOIN THE COALITION FOR A GEOENGINEERING FREE CANADA

Contact Bettina

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1780830142282917/?mibextid=6NoCDW

————————————–

 Common Law Made CLEAR!

Webinar Series

Next Issue:

Statutory principles on “person”

Are you a “resident” of Canada

The unlawful use of Legal Fictions in law

Years in the making…

Next Webinar:

Dec. 8, 4:45 pm PST

Many myths and much disinformation have circulated for

years about our common law, our Constitution, our rights and freedoms, and other important topics.

This incredible Webinar series will finally provide irrefutable documentation confirming the true source of our property rights and the supremacy of God in our Constitution – and why we should be thankful they are NOT in the Charter!!

  • If you want answers to what your common law and Constitutional rights and freedoms are
  • Definitions and applications of the most important words in our law
  • Where your Constitutional right and power of civil disobedience to all unlawful statutes and orders originates
  • How Gov’ts and judges use “legal fictions” to steal your fundamental rights and freedoms from you
  • What limited rights, powers, and duties Gov’ts truly have

And much, much more…this is the Webinar series you have been waiting for!

We provide all sources of our research for verification purposes!!

By registering to this Webinar series, you will have

downloadable access to each presentation you have registered to watch!

All webinars have a password that is provided to you to access each show you wish to receive, or if you register for the series, all webinars.

Never forget important information again!

For more information, go to:

Clearbc.org

For registration information, email us at:

clear2012@pm.me

————————————–

COVID-19: Lessons Learned Review

THE REPORT”

Analysis:

On March 16, 2022, the B.C Gov’t appointed a Commission comprised of three (3) people to analyze the Gov’t’s actions in relation to COVID-19. That Report was issued last week, in November 2022.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/public-safety-and-emergency-services/emergency-preparedness-response-recovery/embc/reports/covid-19_lessons_learned_report.pdf

Notwithstanding the claims by the B.C. Government’s Minister Farnworth that the Report upheld the Gov’t’s response, this is pretty far from the truth. Here is the stated summary of their Report:

We were tasked with undertaking an operational review of the B.C. government’s pandemic response to help government prepare for future events. The review looked at preparations for the pandemic, the processes used to make decisions, government communications related to the pandemic response, and the implementation of response measures. Our findings include things that went well and things that could have been improved, because there are lessons to be learned from both. (What about things that went wrong – and there was lots of them?) (my emphasis)

We approached our task through a combination of research and

engagement. Our research examined the operational context within which government responded to the pandemic, public health and emergency management best practices, the events that took place during the pandemic, and how B.C. compared with other populous provinces in terms of several outcome indicators. We engaged broadly with the public, government, stakeholders, and Indigenous people and organizations to understand the response from a range of perspectives.

Before even examining this Report and its conclusions and findings, what does this Summary actually admit? I will come back to this at the end of this article – no cheating!!!

Many of the findings are quite irrelevant to our discussion here, such as people being dissatisfied with the time between announcements from Bonnie Henry at her press releases, and the timing of the Orders being issued.

The primary foundation of this Report is the assumption (or Gov’t direction) that there was a global pandemic. All findings, Part 3 What We Found, are based on the assumption that there was a pandemic. Nothing in this Report analyzed the accuracy of the Gov’t’s claims of a pandemic, nor challenges the truthfulness of the Gov’t statistics and claims.

For example, when the first Emergency Orders were issued on March 16 and 18, 2020 (Henry and Farnworth), only three people had allegedly died of COVID-19 in B.C. That is not a pandemic. Simply because the World Health Organization (WHO) issues an order of a pandemic, does not mean, factually, that there is a health emergency of that nature in B.C. Does it mean B.C. is required by law, because Canada is a member of the WHO, to issue such an Order?

Nor did the authors of this Report examine the fact that the Emergency Order by Minister Farnworth was issued without jurisdiction to so do, as the Emergency Program Act of B.C. only applies to natural disasters, not to viral infections or pandemics.

Nor did the authors of this Report consider that the PCR test utilized by the B.C. Gov’t has a documented 97.5% false positive rate and how this would have affected the statistics in relation to deaths and health effects.

Nor did the authors of this Report consider as to why the Gov’t determined to use PCR in the first place, and why it decided to use 35+ cycles in its use.

Nor did the authors of this Report consider Bonnie Henry’s previous admissions in evidence in Ontario and admissions in B.C., that masks do not prevent viral transmissions.

In examining these issues, all findings were made as admissions that the Gov’t narrative was correct, when in fact of course, the were not.

Why did the authors fail to contact organizations, groups or individuals opposing the Gov’t narrative, and seek out their reasons for so doing and their supporting materials? If the authors were charged with determining if the statistics released by the Gov’t were correct to support the restrictions, the results would have been much different, and even further against the Gov’t narrative. Indeed, the Terms of Reference for this Commission, stated the following: (Appendix “A”)

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all aspects of the BC government and the broad BC public sector throughout 2020, 2021, and into 2022…The scope of the review excludes an assessment of economic recovery and public policy decisions made by government to deal with the consequences of the pandemic and decisions made by the independent Provincial Health Officer. The review will, however, look at how these decisions were made.” (my emphasis)

These Terms set the foundation for this Committee that:

  1. There was a pandemic for COVID-19;
  2. The Committee was prohibited from doing a review or assessment on the decisions that were made by the Gov’t and Bonnie Henry.

Considerations, noted above and others in relation to the PCR test, mask effectiveness, vaccine orders, distancing orders, lockdown decisions etc., could not be examined by the Committee and thus Henry et al continue to remain unaccountable for them, and the Report conclusions are skewed in favour of the Gov’t as a result, as was intended by the Gov’t.

The Committee was given instructions, directly and via how to conduct their investigation by the parameters set for this report, to achieve results the Gov’t could rely upon to its benefits, while simultaneously minimizing all opposition.

As expected, it is a political sham which fails to get to the nature of COVID itself, the falsified stats, false PCR test results, etc.

This is the problem associated with these commissions – the Gov’ts appoint the authors, arbitrators or adjudicators, and the Gov’ts set the Terms and Conditions, what they can inquire into and what they cannot, to assure, as best they can, that they are unaccountable for their actions, while claiming to the public that this “independent” committee determined that they were doing a good job.

Interestingly, whether people wanted longer and more comprehensive restrictions or those who wanted none at all, a large majority of the people believed that the Gov’t failed in its response.

Indicative of the quantity of people opposing the lockdowns and restrictions, the authors admit that:

A vast majority of respondents want a review of the actual decisions made to respond to the pandemic, which is beyond the scope of this review.

The extreme level of vitriol directed at decision-makers by many respondents was shocking.

This indicates that the vast majority of people did not trust the Gov’t reports and statistics, and disagreed with the restrictions and lockdowns.

Statement #4 was worded: I trusted COVID-19 information provided by Gov’t

This resulted in a whopping 74% disagreement of Gov’t information!

Statement #6: Overall the B.C. Gov’t managed the pandemic well

Disagree: 74% Agree: 18%

The authors then stated:

A relatively small number of people commented on the enforcement of provincial orders and felt that government should have been more assertive.

From the above alone, it can be seen that despite the selective people involved, the vast majority did not trust or believe the Gov’t, and believed that the restrictions were excessive.

Now the crème de la crème. With regards to my opening insights into this Report. Though the authors claim to have engaged the public through an online survey, (p. 45), this was not publicly announced very well, and most members of the public were completely unaware of it. Over 15 000 people responded, (p, 45), but it is not stated where these people originated – were they all union/gov’t employees, or with a vested interest in the outcome, or within the large group of people who believed the Gov’t narrative? It appears that this survey was publicized to the organizations set out in Appendix “E” to the Report.

The authors of this Report admit to their awareness of the existence of many opposition groups to the lockdowns and restrictions. (p. 36, 37). However, they made no attempts to reach out to any of them.

None of these groups contacted have expressed opposition to the Gov’t narrative, statistics, or pandemic claims. All of them, in one way or another, cooperated with and/or supported the Gov’t due to financial or legal considerations. The authors made no attempt to contact Vaccine Choice Canada (Ted Kuntz), Action4Canada (Tanya Gaw), CLEAR (David Lindsay), Unity and medical doctors, or any other individuals or groups opposed to the Gov’t narrative and restrictions.

Despite the lack of participation by professional groups and people opposing the Gov’t narrative in this Report, there is clearly widespread opposition against the Gov’t. If people opposing the Gov’t narrative had been contacted and involved, these statistics and findings would have significantly increased in our favour and there would have been many adverse findings against the Gov’t, such that they would have had to truly justify their decisions and false statistics.

After perusing this document, the following findings became clear:

1. It is based on the false assumption that there was a pandemic and a response was needed (the BC Emergency Program Act does not allow for declarations of emergencies for viruses – only floods, earthquakes etc.)

2. No attempt was made to determine if the experimental injections themselves were safe after being developed in only months.

3. No attempt was made to determine if Bonnie Henry’s stats were correct or not to support their emergency actions, restrictions and lockdowns.

4. The incredible amount of public distrust and anger was visible, even though groups like ours who vehemently opposed these lockdowns and restrictions, were never consulted or our reasons considered.

5. All participating groups and individuals were corporations, unions, Gov’ts and Gov’t bodies, and others who are predisposed, either via bias (benefits such as employment or subsidies, or contracts), in favour of the Gov’t narrative. (Appendix “A”, p. 3) The lack of opposition is indicative of a study attempting to get hoped for Gov’t supportive results. Despite this, the results were, as the authors admit, shockingly against the Gov’t.

Sunday Paper Deliveries

A second time-slot has been added for those who cannot make it Sunday Mornings:

  1. Every Sunday at 11:30am and 1:30pm is now also an option.
  • Sign-up on the Newspaper Delivery list so that you get an email confirming the deliveries for each Sunday. With winter in mind, we will only do this if roads are bare and it’s not snowing. The advantage of delivering this time of year is that nobody is hanging out in their front yards so you don’t have to worry about confrontations.
  • We meet at the Capri parking lot between A&W and De Dutch Pannekoek House
  • Bring a large bag for carrying the papers if you want
  • Grab a free small Kelowna map book that can help you get situated. Your cell phone will be tracking and tracing you. Learn how to read maps again
  • You will be provided with a printed google map of the area you will be delivering to. Bring a yellow marker to indicate which streets you completed. You may run out of papers or you may end up with extra
  • We ask that with every paper you deliver, you remove the inserts and place them in the mailbox in front or behind the paper. That way, someone who may hastily throw out the paper will still be forced to see each individual flyer
  • Please deliver only one paper per mailbox, regardless if you have different papers (we usually have a combination of different papers and editions). Some houses may have up to 4 mailboxes; put one paper in each as they are for different tenants
  • Dress warm and wear practical footwear
  • Please always bring back your filled-out map and extra papers to the CLEAR booth on Saturdays or the following Sunday so we can keep track of the areas that got done and restock those papers
  • We will keep doing this every Sunday, weather-permitting, until the majority of our 150,000 population has been reached. The more people step up to help, the faster this will get done!

Make Sure to check your email on Sunday mornings for confirmation that our paper delivery will take place that day

Anonymous Surveys

On Nov. 19/22, many people took surveys home to fill out. There was a total of 100 surveys and many are still missing. Please be sure to fill it out and return it to the CLEAR booth this Saturday, Dec. 10/22.

Thank you to all who have filled it out so far!

3 Simple Things Freedom Activists can do to WIN this War:

  1. Spread the Word by delivering papers and flyers everywhere:

Knowledge is power!

  1. Replace your cell phone with a flip phone:

Think of your apps as TRAPS!

  1. Use CASH:

Hand out the “Use cash cards” and “pay cash” business posters

————————————–

https://www.oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective

From Vaccine Choice Canada

Please obtain a copy from Tom at Saturday’s Kelowna Rallies and pass along to informed and uninformed alike!

Or watch here:

https://librti.com/uninformed-consent

————————————–

https://mailchi.mp/7007fe570ab7/manning-launches-national-citizens-inquiry?e=b1296672d3

NATIONAL CITIZENS’ INQUIRY LAUNCHED

PRESTON MANNING ANNOUNCES NCI FROM PARLIAMENT

We need a truly independent inquiry – not some committee where the arbitrator is appointed and the terms and conditions set out by the Prime Dictator of Canada.

Here is the Petition:

————————————–

OF INTEREST:

Is a Federal Election coming???

Recently, a freedom supporter and former volunteer for Elections Canada, was contacted and asked if she was available during the last weeks of January, 2023!


Interesting that a likely Federal Election is being contemplated PRIOR to the decision on the Public Emergencies Act Hearing.

————————————–

REMINDER

New Credit Card Fees & Lack of Privacy

The dangers of digital gov’t ID and currencies are here… you need to use cash.

Withdraw money on Sunday from the bank machine, and then leave your money at home if you are scared to carry it with you, and just carry the amounts of cash for each day’s purchases for the week.

NO MORE CARDS!!!! NO EXCUSES!

USE CASH!!!

————————————–

Contact Unity Health & Sciences Team to volunteer to distribute their professional brochures and Medical Doctor Packages throughout your home area, and to your medical doctor!

Not every doctor, analyst, and specialist is on the gov’t side and many have strong science and personal experiences opposing the gov’t narrative.

———————————

New signs???

Even though COVID-19 restrictions are, for the most part, no longer in effect, other freedom issues have arisen as gov’ts use the cover of COVID-19 to introduce other more formidable liberty restrictions, including privacy violations.

Freedom is a multi-generational struggle – our legacy is to leave a better place for our children, not simply to quit after an issue appears to be over and anger diminishes; and of course, it rarely is truly over.

We urge you to provide designs (clear2012@pm.me) and/or your own signs for upcoming threats, including Digital ID

Digital currency and no cash

Climate change fraud

Further restrictions

————————————–

————————————–

CLEARBITS:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/alberta-premier-says-provincial-firearms-act-coming-in-spring_4903345.html

On the heels of the Constitutional Challenge filed by David Lindsay against the RCMP in British Columbia, Alberta is now bringing in legislation in the spring of 2023, in relation to firearms and elimination of the RCMP!

https://www.theepochtimes.com/trudeau-says-he-expects-police-to-prevent-a-freedom-convoy-repeat-as-planning-is-under-way_4901360.html

Trudeau Says He Expects Police to Prevent a Freedom Convoy Repeat as Planning Is Under Way

https://www.theepochtimes.com/parti-quebecois-barred-from-quebec-legislature-after-refusing-to-take-oath-to-king_4898006.html

Quebec ministers refuse to swear allegiance to the Monarch. Meanwhile, Premier Legault claims that he will introduce legislation so that ministers do not have to take the Oath in Quebec.

The problem? Quebec will run into s. 126 of the Constitution Act 1867, aka the British North America Act 1867, which Constitutionally mandates that this Oath must be taken as a condition to sit in the Legislature and Parliament.

There is no ‘notwithstanding’ clause to the BNA Act as there is in the Charter, and it is an English document, which means this is all political bravado…Quebec cannot pass such legislation as this is prohibited by s. 126!

Netherlands to close up to 3,000 farms to comply with EU rules

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/11/28/netherlands-close-3000-farms-comply-eu-rules/

 

Freedom Rallies

It ain’t over till it’s over”

Kelowna, BC

December 10, 2022

-4° – Cloudy  (subject to change without notice!!! Lol – dress warm – NO SNOW!!!!)

12:00 noon

+ The CLEAR Information Table

Stuart Park

Because It Ain’t Over!

—————————————

December 10, 2022 12:00 noon

Vernon Freedom Rally

12:00 a.m. – 2:00 p.m. @ Polson Park

Join Darren for the Largest rally in the North Okanagan, and growing weekly!

North Okanagan Shuswap Freedom Radio

http://s1.voscast.com:11464/stream

—————

Decembrer 10, 2022 11:30 a.m.

OK Falls Freedom Rally

11:30 a.m. Across from Esso Station

Join the OK Falls freedom activists continuing their local Freedom Rallies!

—————

Decembrer 10, 2022 12:00 noon

Oliver Freedom Rally

12:00 p.m. Town Hall

Join the Oliver freedom activists who are continuing their local Freedom Rallies!

—————

December 10, 2022 11:00 a.m.

Osoyoos Freedom Gathering

11:00 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. Town Hall

—————

Kamloops Freedom Gathering

December 10, 2022 10:00 – 12:00 Noon

Valleyview Centennial Park

Soros Pro-Abortion & Pro-LGBTQ Agenda Front Groups Defame CitizenGo

Soros Pro-Abortion & Pro-LGBTQ Agenda Front Groups Defame CitizenGo

Because of our great success in giving a voice to you and millions of CitizenGO members, Soros-funded groups and international abortion giants are targeting us to try to shut us up or shut us down. Our plans require substantial funding — and the bills are beginning to stack up…

Here’s the email we sent you earlier on this:

, First: the Planned Parenthood and Soros-funded European Parliamentary Forum on Sexual and Reproductive Rights (EPF) released a report in six languages misrepresenting CitizenGO documents stolen from my hard drive.

Then: they attacked us by name and defamed us in a hearing of the European Parliament, slandering CitizenGO as “anti-democracy” and asking the European Union to censor us. Now: CitizenGO refused to back down, and we’ve stung them with our redoubled campaigns, so they’re coming after us. I need your support today to fight back.

Just a few weeks ago, the Soros-funded EPF released a new report attacking CitizenGO and other pro-life, pro-family organizations. Using Radical Leftist tactics to destroy their enemies, they filled this new report with lies, distortions, and references to documents stolen from my hard drive in a hacker attack.

This is dangerous, my friend. They are gearing up for all-out war, and their goal is to shut up or shut down CitizenGO, and anyone else who opposes their radical anti-life, anti-family agenda. I expect they will soon demand our campaigns be banned and our doors closed. They are really obsessed with CitizenGO (I counted 179 references to us in the report).

And we are first in their sights because thanks to you and millions more supporters we are having the most impact, exposing their lies and evil and stopping their plans. If you and I are shut out of standing for the unborn, a healthy family and Christian values, who will stand against the Radical Leftists, the abortion industry and the LGBT lobby?

I fear no one else will dare stand. So, with this rising threat (and great hope from our success), I ask you to stand with CitizenGO. I am not afraid to keep up the fight as long as I know you are standing with me. Now is the time to defend ourselves in Congresses and Parliaments, in the media and in courts of law. Everywhere, anywhere.

This requires a warchest before the worst of the battle starts. If we are not prepared to stop their attacks on us, CitizenGO is in danger of being forbidden to operate in multiple countries, or even forced to close our doors. As you may know: Our campaigners Caroline Farrow in England and Ann Kioko in Kenya have been targeted multiple times by hackers, radical activists, and lawsuits for defending the lives of children and the family. Multiple Soros-linked organizations have mentioned CitizenGO specifically as threats to their radical agendas in open strategy meetings. CitizenGO’s bank transfer services vendor shut down our account without any warning for political reasons. Radical leftist governments in Spain (where we are based) and other countries have started legal and administrative processes to hurt CitizenGO. We suffer hacker attacks every few weeks. That is why CitizenGO is constantly on the lookout for attacks, why I have contracted some lawyers to help us bring EPF to the courts for the illegal usage of our stolen documents and defamation, and why I am planning campaigns addressed to members of European Parliament to prepare for when EPF tries to shut us down. But the costs to both defend ourselves from attack and increase our activism around the world are only going to rise, and I need your help. Please, chip in today to help CitizenGO continue to fight:
I will donate $14 I will donate $42 I will donate $112 I will donate $224 I will donate $420 OTHER AMOUNT We continue to defend unborn children and vulnerable women and girls against cultural imperialism and the push for more abortion by the United Nations. You, me and another 552,000 concerned citizens supported our petition to the UN Commission on Populations. Additionally, over 230,00 of our signatures contributed to the successful erasing of the radical content related to abortion and the LGBT agenda from the final document of the UN Commission on the Status of Women 65. We are running a global campaign demanding the Big Tech CEOs of Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google, Apple, Amazon, Pinterest to stop censoring our voice. You, me and another 513,000 CitizenGO members (and counting) are currently pressuring Netflix to remove offensive scenes from their series Paradise PD. The episode portrays Jesus as coming down from the cross to kill his persecutors with machine guns, followed by the scene where he engages in actions that are nothing short of pornography. We are protecting our brave Campaigner Ann Kioko, who is attacked by Marie Stopes (international abortion giant) with a lawsuit, because she exposed its illegal activities in Kenya. I would not take back a single campaign, and I would not abandon a single fight. But the fact remains, our effectiveness has made us the number one target of EPF, and I need your support to defend us all.

Sincerely,

Ignacio Arsuaga and the entire CitizenGO Team

P.S. The Soros-funded EPF is coming for CitizenGO, and anyone who will fight the radical abortion agenda. Just a few weeks ago, they launched their third attack on CitizenGO, brazenly referencing stolen documents to slander our work defending the unborn. Your support is critical to help us increase our defense of the unborn, as well as defend ourselves from EPF.

More information: EPF’s Report on CitizenGO and other pro-life and pro-family groups (European Parliamentary Forum on Sexual and Reproductive Rights) Christian organizations in Europe blacklisted as “anti-gender religious extremists” by pro-abortion parlamentarians (Evangelical Focus) CitizenGO’s Global Ambitions Threaten Women’s Rights in East Africa (Byline Times)

CitizenGO is a community of active citizens that works to ensure that human life, the family and our freedoms are respected worldwide. CitizenGO members live in every nation of the world. Our team is spread across 16 countries on 5 continents and operates in 12 languages. Learn about CitizenGO here or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.This message is addressed to paul@paulfromm.com.If you do not wish to receive emails from CitizenGO, click on this link. To ensure that CitizenGO messages reach your inbox, please add petitions-en@citizengo.org to your address book. To change your email address, language settings, or other personal information, contact us. To contact CitizenGO, please do not reply to this email. Instead, write to us at citizengo.org/en/contact.

Euro ‘Anti-Hate’ Group Boss Discussed ‘Necessity’ of Killing Whites

Euro ‘Anti-Hate’ Group Boss Discussed ‘Necessity’ of Killing Whites

Concern After European ‘Anti-Hate’ Group Boss Discussed ‘Necessity’ of Killing White People

People wear face masks in downtown Lisbon on October 28, 2020. - The Portuguese support the wearing of the compulsory mask outdoors, a measure that came into force today, in order to stem the resumption of the coronavirus epidemic. (Photo by PATRICIA DE MELO MOREIRA / AFP) (Photo by PATRICIA …

PATRICIA DE MELO MOREIRA/AFP via Getty ImagesChris Tomlinson24 Nov 20204102:20

Mamadou Ba, head of the Portuguese “anti-hate” group SOS Racismo, spoke of the need to “kill the white man” at a recent online conference on “hate speech”.

Ba, a Portuguese citizen originally from Senegal, attended the conference on Saturday which was on the topic of “Racism and the Advancement of Hate Speech in the World”.

During the conference, which was attended by Portuguese speakers from Portugal and Brazil, Ba stated “it is necessary to kill the white man, murderer, colonial, and racist” to “prevent the social death of the black political subject”.

According to a report from Portuguese daily newspaper Correio da Manhã, the statement was a quote from Algerian far-left anti-colonialist political philosopher Frantz Fanon, who openly advocated for violence during the French rule of Algeria in his seminal work The Wretched of the Earth.

The newspaper states that it is not clear whether Ba was quoting the far-left philosopher, but said it was presumed he did so in agreement.

“Refutation is part of the proposition, but what matters most to combat hate speech is to propose a new narrative,” Ba said during the online meeting.

Earlier this year, the European Network Against Racism (ENAR), which is partnered with Hungarian-American billionaire George Soros’s Open Society Foundations, called for support of SOS Rascimo, which it described as one of the “founding members” of the ENAR.

According to the ENAR, Ba and other activists had been sent threats online, and Ba himself had received a letter with a bullet casing inside it.

The incident is not the first controversial moment for a so-called “anti-hate” group in Europe, many of which have direct ties to both Open Society Foundations and George Soros, such as Hope Not Hate in the UK which was identified in a Swedish military report on far-left extremism in 2018.

In Germany, the anti-hate Amadeau Antonio Stiftung, headed by former Stasi informant Anetta Kahane, sparked controversy after releasing a guide for schools to spot “Nazi parents”.

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/11/24/euro-anti-hate-group-boss-discussed-necessity-of-killing-whites/

Sacrificing Billions to Save Thousands?

Throne, Altar, Liberty

The Canadian Red Ensign

The Canadian Red Ensign

Friday, April 24, 2020

Sacrificing Billions to Save Thousands?

In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all,
By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul;
But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy,
And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.”
– Rudyard Kipling

The way the World Health Organization, our power-hungry politicians, the technocratic boobs with tunnel vision who are our health apparatchiks, and the cheap harlots of the mainstream media talk about it, one would think that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a real life equivalent of the artificially engineered, antibody resistant, superflu which wipes out most of the world’s population in Stephen King’s 1978 novel The Stand and the various adaptations thereof. It is not. Although it is possible that like the weaponized flu strain in the novel, it escaped from a laboratory, that of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, it is not remotely comparable in terms of lethality. It is basically a normal strain of bat influenza that has jumped species to humans, that has been spreading rapidly due to it being new to the species and thus our having no built up immunity to it yet, but most people are not at risk of anything worse than the ordinary flu from it. Those who are most susceptible to developing the severe and potentially lethal form of pneumonia that it can produce are the same people susceptible to catching pneumonia and dying from H1N1 and the other, ordinary, seasonal strains of the flu.

From the beginning of this pandemic it has been apparent that the WHO’s claims with regards to the lethality of this virus have been greatly exaggerated. Although the press in its daily reports has used “staggering” and similar scare words to describe the rising death tolls, the numbers themselves have not supported the use of such adjectives. Not when taken in context at any rate. COVID-19 has not become the leading cause of death, it is nowhere close to it. The overall number of deaths from all causes for the period of this pandemic has not risen astronomically in comparison with the number for the same period in other years. Indeed, in some areas that have been particularly hard hit by COVID-19 this number has been down from recent years.

In most countries, the epidemiologists’ original projections of expected deaths from this disease have been radically revised downward. At some point the mortality rate will have to undergo a similar radical adjustment. Contrary to the lies of the health authorities and the media, the official death count for COVID-19 is not too low but too high. Even though the vast majority of people who have caught this virus and died have had multiple other conditions that also contributed to their demise these have all been classified as deaths from COVID-19. If deaths from regular influenza were counted the same way the mortality rate for the flu would be much higher than it is. Similarly, the other number that goes into the mortality rate calculation is much too low. Since a large number – as many as fifty percent some estimates put it – of those who contract the virus are completely asymptomatic, the total number known to have been infected is obviously much, much, lower than the true number of infected. Indeed, when we consider that international travel in and out of Hubei province was allowed long after the initial outbreak began there – and long after Red China shut down travel from that province to the rest of their own country – during a period in which Western countries, sick with a liberalism far more lethal than this virus, resisted imposing travel restrictions on China, it is almost certain that the virus had made it into all of our countries long before we noticed that it had arrived.

Since the potential lethality of this virus has been hugely exaggerated, the extent to which the repugnant, totalitarian, Communistic measures being taken almost everywhere are “saving lives” is also exaggerated. In pointing this out I do not wish merely to throw water on those currently engaged in a nauseating orgy of self-congratulatory, backslapping, tripe over their efforts to save lives by sacrificing our freedoms, but to contrast the low number of lives saved with the potentially much higher number of lives endangered by the same measures.

While I am no fan of Karl Marx – Groucho is much more my style – and am of the firm opinion that he was wrong about almost everything, there are a few rare exceptions to this. One such exception was the sentence with which he opened his letter to Louis Kugelmann on July 11, 1868. He wrote “Every child knows a nation which ceased to work, I will not say for a year, but even for a few weeks, would perish.” With this sentence he introduces an argument that is neither interesting nor relevant to the subject at hand, but the sentence itself states an obvious truth, one very similar to that which is found in the verses by Rudyard Kipling quoted at the beginning of this essay.

The Reverend Thomas Robert Malthus continues to be remembered to this day for his theory about population size and the food supply. Human beings, Malthus argued, can increase our food supply through improved means of production, but if we do so the natural human response will be an increase in reproduction. The increase in reproduction will be faster and larger than the increase in food production so that the growth in population size will exceed the increase to the food supply and as a result there will be famine, poverty, starvation, disease and death. His essay on the Principle of Population was first published in 1798. He expanded and revised it in 1803, and published several further editions with minor revisions before his death in 1834. From that day to this, it has inspired several prophecies of doom, the most famous of recent times being the 1968 bestseller The Population Bomb by Stanford University’s Paul Ehrlich which predicted that hundreds of millions of people would die in the 1970s from starvation due to overpopulation. That, of course, did not happen.

There is obviously a flaw somewhere in Malthus’ theory. The question is where. According to the popular Demographic Transition Model, first developed by Warren Thomson in 1929, the problem is with his understanding of human nature. According to this theory, as societies progress towards industrialization they pass through stages and, after they have achieved a certain level of industrial development, fertility rates drop drastically and population size stabilizes. While the demographic history of Western countries and other developed countries such as Japan in the twentieth century would seem to bear this interpretation out, explaining its having passed into conventional wisdom, it has not gone without challenge. Dr. Virginia Deane Abernethy of Vanderbilt University, for example, in her book Population Politics (Transaction Books, 2000) gave several examples of empirical evidence that goes against the theory, making the case that popular late twentieth century progressive efforts to combat Third World overpopulation and poverty with policies based upon the assumption of the DTM, such as foreign relief and liberal immigration to the West as a population safety valve, have not worked as the model would have predicted but have, if anything, made the problem worse. The sharp decline in fertility that developed countries have experienced since the end of the post-World War II Baby Boom is better explained by other aspects of the transition to modernity, such as a severe weakening of the traditional idea that producing posterity is a duty we owe to our ancestors, than by industrial prosperity itself.


The other leading explanation of the flaw in Malthus’ theory is that he vastly underestimated our capacity to improve and increase the food supply. This explanation is also borne out by the history of the twentieth century and much more consistently than that of the DTM.

Now, if this explanation of what went wrong with the predictions based upon Malthus’ theory is the correct one, and I believe it is, then what could potentially happen when we have a global population of 7.8 billion people and we shut down the economy all over the world, jeopardizing out ability to produce food at this improved and increased capacity?

Why, lo and behold, we have just discovered where the potential for a death rate as a high as the one in Stephen King’s book is to be found.

Yes, shutting down the economies of practically every country in the world, is indeed a move that will put the food supply in jeopardy. When those who produce and sell food are almost the only ones allowed to be open they are essentially being asked or told to work for nothing, for nobody else is producing anything with which to pay them. Yes, governments are printing and handing out fiat money by the gazillions, but money has no intrinsic value. Its role in the marketplace is to be a convenient stand-in for real goods. The X number of dollars that you pay someone for Y amount of magic beans, represents the cow that you would have traded in a barter exchange. Perhaps that is a bad example, because both beans and cattle are sources of food, but I think it still gets the point across. If only category of producers are allowed to actually produce anything for sale in the market, the currency that is exchanged in that market will rapidly become worthless, and those producers will become overburdened and start to fail. It is estimated that nine million people in the world die from hunger every year. It is responsible for half of the deaths of children under the age of five. This is over three times the number of people known to have been infected with COVID-19. It is about fifty times more than the number who have died after contracting the virus. As of this writing, the number who have died from hunger in 2020 so far is almost three million. That’s about fifteen times the number who have died after contracting COVID-19, whether the virus was the primary killer or not. The measures being taken to combat COVID-19 will drive the number who die from hunger up and by considerably more than they can bring the number who die from COVID-19 down.

There are those who would say that this is the intentional and deliberate true purpose of the global lockdown. I would not go that far. The problem with the interpretation of events as being the intended outcome of a very powerful and malevolent cabal is that it requires assuming that politicians, bureaucrats, technocrats, and the like possess an almost superhuman level of competence. In reality, these are people who think they are Sherlock Holmes, when they are actually Jacques Clouseau – the Jacques Clouseau portrayed by Peter Sellers in Blake Edwards’ Pink Panther films, not the version of the character more recently portrayed by Steve Martin. Unlike the latter, who is able to scrape together enough deductive reasoning to actually solve the case by the end of his movies, Sellers’ classic interpretation of this character was of a bumbling, clumsy, nincompoop whose incompetence is matched only by his vanity and arrogance, and who succeeds only through an extraordinary degree of sheer accidental luck.

That having been said, large scale global depopulation has been one of the chief goals of the environmentalist wing of the United Nations and its ultrawealthy backers like Bill Gates, George Soros, and the late Maurice Strong since at least the 1992 “Earth Summit” at Rio de Janeiro that produced the famous – or, depending upon your perspective, infamous – action plan “Agenda 21.” These people represent the most extreme version of one of the two distortions of Malthus that have been around since his own day. While his detractors, like Victorian novelist Charles Dickens, unjustly accused him of heartlessly wishing upon people the famine, poverty, and death his theory predicted, his supporters, especially those of more recent times, have advocated measures to combat overpopulation that he himself would have found morally repugnant, such as abortion, infanticide, and totalitarian state control of reproduction. Those who want the world’s population reduced by as much as eighty to ninety-five percent are the worst example of this sort. The overlap between the institutions such as the United Nations and individuals such as Bill Gates who advocate this radical agenda and those behind the global lockdown is certainly worth taking note of.

Whether intentional or merely the result of the kind of stupidity that is the unique property of technocratic experts – “I had no idea my solution to Problem X would create the much worse Problem Y because that is not my field of expertise” – the potential lethality of the measures being taken to combat COVID-19, far exceeds that of the disease itself.
Posted by Gerry T. Neal at 6:14 AM Labels: Agenda 21, Bill Gates, Blake Edwards, COVID-19, George Soros, Groucho Marx, Karl Marx, Maurice Strong, Paul Ehrlich, Peter Sellers, Rudyard Kipling, Stephen King, Thomas Robert Malthus, Virginia Deane Abernethy

This Shameful Attack By  Masked Anti-Racists is on YOU, Hamilton City Council, Who Refused to Hear Supporters of Free Speech & Urged City Staff to Find Ways to Ban Protest

This Shameful Attack By  Masked Anti-Racists is on YOU, Hamilton City Council, Who Refused to Hear Supporters of Free Speech & Urged City Staff to Find Ways to Ban Protests 
 
THIS IS ON YOU! On Canadian Anti-Hate (ANTI-WHITE) NETWORK, on the anonymous smear artists at Anti-Racist Canada and on all the unthinking leaders who preach the gospel of anti-racism and suppression of free speech.
 
 
Get this straight! Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White. This elderly lady is being tormented by the psycho masked Red Guards of the George Soros globalists.
 
So much for Hamilton being a city of “diversity” and “inclusion”. It’s toe the party line or be banned or harassed!
 
Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION
ELDERLY WOMAN ATTACKED BY ANTIFA.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgRerQKRxJA  

The Big Match: Alison Chabloz versus George Soros

DISCLAIMER: This is a private communication. If you would prefer not to receive messages from me please respond with ‘unsubscribe’ in the subject line.
If you received this post from a 3rd party and would like to be on this list please send an email to me at the above address.
 
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
 
 
Today is DAY 61 of Monika Schaefer’s loss of freedom. 
LET US CONSPIRE TO GAIN HER RELEASE
 
Write to Monika at the following NEW address:
 
Monika Schaefer
Stadelheim Prison
Stadelheimer Straße
81549 Munich
Germany

The Big Match: Alison Chabloz versus George Soros

 
Dear Reader & Supporter of Free Speech,
 
Alison Chabloz, musician, singer and song writer, will be appearing in court this coming Wednesday, March 7th, 2018 to fight for our freedom of speech. Please try to post and share this public notice asap. Much thanks.
 
Mehr Licht!
 
Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
“Digging to the issues since 1998”
______________________________

Total vindication for Jez Turner’s speech that the Shomrim’s existence is due to Jewish Power

On the afternoon of the 4th July 2015 I gave a speech to an Anti-Shomrim rally opposite Downing Street in Whitehall.
 This was a speech, be it noted, where I stated that the sole reason only one ethnic group in Britain today was permitted to have a vigilante force, ‘The Shomrim’ –  and one at that, that wears uniforms that resemble police uniforms, that drive cars that are identical to police cars (the word ‘POLICE’ changed to ‘SHOMRIM’ is the only difference), that is publicly funded, that is given fire-arms training by the police etc – is not because of the unique victims status of Jews, but because of the power of the Jewish lobby.
Various George Soros funded Jewish lobby groups were outraged that I could openly declare that Jewish lobby groups were so powerful that they could even make a nonsense of the law of the land and overturn long-held conventions on vigilante groups, and so demanded that I be prosecuted.  The Crown Prosecution Service decided that what I said was not a crime and therefore they could not prosecute me.
This enraged the George Soros funded Jewish lobby groups even further, and they set about using their lobbying power to overturn this decision and have me prosecuted anyway.
They lobbied for a Judicial Review of my case and their lobbying power got them this.  They lobbied behind the scenes to have the Judicial Review to decide to go ahead and to prosecute me, and their lobbying power has now got them this.
They lobbied for me to be put on show trial for daring to point out the extent of Jewish lobbying power, and their lobbying power got them this.  They are now lobbying behind the scenes to ensure that I be found guilty and for me to be sent to the gulag, like so many other thought criminals, and no doubt their lobbying power shall get them all of this too.
No surprise for me in any of this.
To summarise, less than 1% of the UK’s population is Jewish, yet they have immense power and influence – almost as if they were 99% of the population, not 1%, and they use this power to silence anyone who points out this discrepancy.  Such lobbying power in Britain today can only be termed one thing –  ‘Jewish Supremacism’.
I have been proved correct, I have been vindicated.
Let the show trial commence.
Initial hearing where I enter a plea of ‘Guilty’ or ‘Not Guilty’ will be on Monday 30th October, 1.30pm, Westminster Magistrates Court, Marylebone.
Kind Regards
Jez Turner