Jez Turner, the British Resistor, Appears for First Session of His `Hate Speech`Trial

Jez Turner, the British Resistor, Appears for First Session of His `Hate Speech`Trial

A big thanks to all those who were able to support me in court, (supporters of our cause filled the public gallery to overflowing and a new court room had to be found to accommodate the Jews who wanted to listen in!) for those who weren’t able here’s the pre-court speech, (& jail house rock dance!)  they missed.  (Anyone who wants a gulag haircut like mine and would like the name of my barber, I regret to say he has now fled the country fearing for his life.)  Next hearing will be, Southwark Crown Court, Monday 27th November 9.30am.  Until then ‘unconditional bail’!


Jez Turner appears at a central London Magistrates Court

These eight words are the issue:


` ‘We must free the World from Jewish control! ‘ (the 8 words)





Throughout Europe, especially Britain, so-called hate laws are passed by parliaments to stifle debate on immigration. The purpose of these inhumane anti-debate laws is not to protect minorities; it is to shield treacherous political elite from scrutiny or criticism.

Mike Walsh, who was sentenced to 6 x 4 month prison sentences for publishing anti-immigration fliers, is skeptical of government censorship and repression.

“Since my imprisonment in 1979, British government’s foreign policy, in collusion with that of the United States, has slaughtered, maimed, and made homeless millions of ethnic groups. Since the cell door slammed on me the UK government has been directly and indirectly responsible for conflicts that caused the worst humanitarian crisis since World War II.

Are we really expected to believe that corrupt political elite, whose military boots crushed liberty in a score of countries in my lifetime, gives a fig about the sensitivities of an Asian shopkeeper or Jewish moneylender?”

On October 30, British dissident Jez Turner at 13.30 attends a pre-trial hearing at Westminster Magistrates Court. The charge relates to his spoken concerns about the influence wielded by a minority with a reputation for race hate incitement. It isn’t hate, it is debate.

On November 3, six young Britons, ex-servicemen and teenagers, are brought before the Old Bailey or Westminster magistrates’ court. Their alleged offence is that they belonged to National Action. This is a small organisation that mounted sporadic non-violent protests against the UK government’s immigration policy. National Action is not an illegal organisation it is a government suppressed entity; there is a difference.

The British state’s case is unconcerned with dissent; the British state encourages Asian, African and Muslim dissent. The state is concerned that Britain’s Whites wish the same rights of protest as those practiced by immigrants and refugees.

On November 20, dissident songwriter Alison Chabloz, who enjoys an international following for her satire, is summoned to a pre-trial hearing at Westminster magistrates’ court. The Joan of Arc heretic is accused of composing lyrics and singing songs of dissent.

If hate rather than debate was the issue then why aren’t the peddlers of anti-White rap, the broadcasters of ant-White racist profanities pursued for writing and ‘singing’ anti-White lyrics in the outpourings.

On February 22, 2018, Simon Sheppard, a lone dissident, is summoned before the bench. His alleged offence is that he was outspokenly critical of noisy neighbours. Had the hapless man’s noisy neighbours been White he would not be facing the magistrates. Sadly, for Simon and the concept of free speech those he complained about are non-White.

Hate or debate? Clearly, it is the governing elite, corrupt media, spineless police and state judiciary that stands accused of hate, race hates against their own kind.

On the dates above, it is not martyred heretics who face trial. In the magistrates’ dock crouches a debauched menacing state elite. The charges against this demonic Orwellian creature relate to base treachery and anti-White race hate.

“The great only appear great because we are on our knees. Let us rise.”  ~ James Larkin Statue on O’Connell Street, Dublin, Ireland.

(Thank you for sharing what media censors).

London Forum Organiser Charged Under Race Act

 London Forum Organiser Charged Under Race Act


Jez Turner – organiser of the London Forum – has been charged with “inciting racial hatred” in connection with his speech at the “Anti-Shomrim” rally in Whitehall on 4th July 2015.

The Zionist lobby group “Campaign Against Anti-Semitism” had brought a legal action to force the Crown Prosecution Service to bring charges against Mr Turner, even though the CPS had originally decided he committed no offence.

An initial hearing will be held at 1.30 pm on Monday 30th October at Westminster Magistrates Court, Marylebone.

Meanwhile another prosecution instigated by the CAA sees anti-Zionist folk singer Alison Chabloz facing charges under the Communications Act, relating to songs uploaded to YouTube. A full day’s hearing of this case will take place at the same Marylebone court on October 25th at 10 am.

Ms Chabloz was arrested again last Wednesday and subjected to an extraordinary 48 hours of custody including travel from London to Derbyshire, following alleged breach of bail conditions.

While we are restricted in reporting these cases at the present stage of proceedings, there will be full updates in forthcoming editions of H&D.

Total vindication for Jez Turner’s speech that the Shomrim’s existence is due to Jewish Power

On the afternoon of the 4th July 2015 I gave a speech to an Anti-Shomrim rally opposite Downing Street in Whitehall.
 This was a speech, be it noted, where I stated that the sole reason only one ethnic group in Britain today was permitted to have a vigilante force, ‘The Shomrim’ –  and one at that, that wears uniforms that resemble police uniforms, that drive cars that are identical to police cars (the word ‘POLICE’ changed to ‘SHOMRIM’ is the only difference), that is publicly funded, that is given fire-arms training by the police etc – is not because of the unique victims status of Jews, but because of the power of the Jewish lobby.
Various George Soros funded Jewish lobby groups were outraged that I could openly declare that Jewish lobby groups were so powerful that they could even make a nonsense of the law of the land and overturn long-held conventions on vigilante groups, and so demanded that I be prosecuted.  The Crown Prosecution Service decided that what I said was not a crime and therefore they could not prosecute me.
This enraged the George Soros funded Jewish lobby groups even further, and they set about using their lobbying power to overturn this decision and have me prosecuted anyway.
They lobbied for a Judicial Review of my case and their lobbying power got them this.  They lobbied behind the scenes to have the Judicial Review to decide to go ahead and to prosecute me, and their lobbying power has now got them this.
They lobbied for me to be put on show trial for daring to point out the extent of Jewish lobbying power, and their lobbying power got them this.  They are now lobbying behind the scenes to ensure that I be found guilty and for me to be sent to the gulag, like so many other thought criminals, and no doubt their lobbying power shall get them all of this too.
No surprise for me in any of this.
To summarise, less than 1% of the UK’s population is Jewish, yet they have immense power and influence – almost as if they were 99% of the population, not 1%, and they use this power to silence anyone who points out this discrepancy.  Such lobbying power in Britain today can only be termed one thing –  ‘Jewish Supremacism’.
I have been proved correct, I have been vindicated.
Let the show trial commence.
Initial hearing where I enter a plea of ‘Guilty’ or ‘Not Guilty’ will be on Monday 30th October, 1.30pm, Westminster Magistrates Court, Marylebone.
Kind Regards
Jez Turner

To send or not to send – that is the argument — English Chanteuse Bound By Severe Bail in Zionist-inspired Internet Restriction Case

To send or not to send – that is the argument — English Chanteuse Bound By Severe Bail in Zionist-inspired Internet Restriction Case

Dear All,

Firstly, apologies for not updating you all earlier. The latest twist in my court case effectively removes my right to publish anything other than the briefest of briefs for fear of being immediately summonsed for breach of bail or contempt of court. My every move and key stroke will be being watched 24 hours a day, seven days a week, in the hope of my family and I being finally worn down to such an extent that I will plead guilty, thus giving my accusers the legal precedent they so desire.

Last Friday, the original charge brought against me in a private prosecution by Mr Faultfinder of the Campaign Against Britons Having The Right To Free Speech In Their Own Land (CAA) was dropped, bringing the total of dropped charges to four. Court was then briefly suspended in order to allow the Crown Prosecutor to serve me with four more charges – two for each song: I am now accused of sending and, at the same time causing to be sent(!), two songs which my accusers claim caused them gross offence. This, after they themselves had sought out one of my blog posts and clicked on a hyperlink which in turn redirected them to YouTube. In short, they chose to watch a video which I did not upload to YouTube and which was never sent to them in the first place.

With a lack of evidence to prove that I would, in fact, have sent or caused to be sent anything other than a hyperlink, my case has again been prolonged whilst the Crown seeks expert analysis, to be submitted in August. A new date for legal argument has been set down for October 25. This gives the CAA another four months of breathing space during which time their small but noisy army of Twitter trolls will no doubt continue to stalk and harass anyone they disagree with.

Last week’s hearing was in fact suspended twice whilst lawyers agreed on dates and discussed varied bail conditions. It was noticeable that the Crown Prosecutor used these breaks to liaise with a tall, olive-skinned young man and that each party was constantly checking their phone. Was this gent a representative of CAA? My original accuser and his chief witness were both conspicuous by their absence: since CAA won its costly campaign to bring about a judicial review of the Jez Turner case, at least one report suggests that it is now a Zionist lobbying organisation which is giving orders to the CPS – a supposedly independent body – when it comes to prosecuting anyone CAA dislikes.

[The Crown Prosecution Service] agreed to consult the CAA in future when making decisions regarding similar cases against Jewish people and whether it can be regarded hate speech or free speech.

Regards my bail conditions (imposed for a ‘crime’ without precedent and therefore likely to go to a higher court and, I might add, all at taxpayers’ expense), these limit not only my freedom of expression but now also my freedom of movement. I must notify my solicitor if I intend to stay anywhere other than my official address for a period of more than ten days. Offers of accommodation for nine days would be most welcome. It doesn’t have to be in the Bahamas – but I wouldn’t say no!

Unsurprisingly, there have been no reports in the media about this landmark case. The last thing my accusers and a pandering, corrupt Establishment want is more Britons waking up to the harsh reality of yet more tyrannical legal constraints undermining our most precious freedom – being able to think for ourselves and express those thoughts. Likewise, there has been complete silence from the press both about Falter’s original charge being dropped as well as the recusal of District Judge Arbuthnot who gagged me last December, resulting in never-ending bail. Frankly, it’s difficult to see how any advantage could be gained by way of further intimidation and harassment of my family and I, as a result of pressure being applied on the authorities by CAA. Or perhaps that’s just me being naive and we really do live in an Orwellian dystopia where patriotism is now a crime?

To conclude, I shall not be using the Internet much in the coming months but you can stay in touch by leaving comments on my blog or contacting me via email. I will try to respond as time and bail conditions permit. There is enough information already on my blog and elsewhere, detailing my ordeal, which exposes quite clearly the underhand methods used by CAA to try and force a conviction.

The good news is that I now have several new songs ready to record and perform, as well as ideas for two books. In the meantime, if you could please support me and encourage others to do likewise by ordering a copy of my Songs of the Shoah EP and/or by donating to any amount, large or small, to my PayPal account, I would be very grateful.

Much gratitude to my steadfast legal team and to those who made the trip to support me last Friday. Thanks for reading and blessings to all.

Free Thinker & Israeli Born Gilad Atzmon Defends Jez Turner, Latest Victim of the U.K.’s Zionist Thought Police


Free Thinker & Israeli Born Gilad Atzmon Defends Jez Turner, Latest Victim of the U.K.’s Zionist Thought Police


The Jews have earned the right to control much of the Western world, and do they control much of Western Europe and North America , but anyone critical of this control must be silenced!

Gilad Atzmon highlights the hypocrisy and double standards flagged up by the persecution of Jez Turner.

United Against Freedom

See More

In Britain, the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) , a ultra Zionist body, is crudely interfering with elementary human rights. It seems as if the campaign …

Jewish Censors close in on Jez Turner


Jewish Censors close in on Jez Turner

CPS weighs prosecution of far-right activist on eve of legal challenge

Campaign Against Antisemitism challenges CPS decision not to charge Jeremy Bedford-Turner

Jeremy Bedford-Turner
Far-right activist Jeremy Bedford-Turner. Photograph: Toby Wells/Youtube

The Crown Prosecution Service is reconsidering whether to prosecute a far-right activist for alleged antisemitism on the eve of a highly unusual legal challenge to its decision to let the case drop.

Government lawyers were due at the high court in London on Wednesday for judicial review proceedings brought by the Campaign Against Antisemitism. The case challenged the CPS decision not to charge a prominent far-right activist, Jeremy Bedford-Turner, for allegedly making antisemitic comments at a demonstration in July 2015.

A judge in the judicial review proceedings said in January that the case raised “potentially important issues for society in this growing area of racist and religious hate crime”.

But on Monday the CPS announced that, following advice from its barristers, it would not argue the case and would instead have a more senior lawyer within the CPS re-examine whether Bedford-Turner should face criminal charges, paying particular attention to section 17 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), known as the “abuse clause”.

The CPS originally examined the allegations against Bedford-Turner for five months, but decided in December 2015 a jury was unlikely to convict him of incitement to religious or racial hatred.

“We have agreed that the prosecutor’s original decision not to charge should be reviewed by a more senior lawyer within the CPS,” a spokesman said. “This decision follows the receipt of new advice from counsel concerning the way in which ECHR issues were considered as part of the decision-making in December 2015. It would be inappropriate to comment further on the case at this time.”

Gideon Falter, chair of the Campaign Against Antisemitism, said the government had shown “complete intransigence” until the last minute: “They’ve waited until the 11th hour to stand down on it. For me this is astounding, because they’ve conceded unequivocally.”


Bedford-Turner is alleged to have appeared at a sparsely attended rally in Westminster, where he said: “All politicians are nothing but a bunch of puppets dancing to a Jewish tune, and the ruling regimes in the west for the last 100 years have danced to the same tune.” He allegedly added: “Let’s free England from Jewish control.” The Campaign Against Antisemitism says he claimed the French revolution and both world wars were perpetrated by the Jews.

Weyman Bennett, joint secretary of Unite Against Fascism, said: “Even if the prosecutions are unsuccessful, the impact of prosecuting people who are carrying out those crimes will be to show – instead of being lenient on it – that there’s a genuine attempt to understand that in the present atmosphere and the rise of hate crimes post-Brexit that it’s important to nip these things very, very early on.”

Richard Edmonds – ‘Report on Robert Faurisson’

Richard Edmonds – ‘Report on Robert Faurisson’

at the  London Forum, April 30, 2016

Richard Edmonds will give us an update on the fight in France for the right to speak historical truth with his report on the trial and tribulations of one of the most famous campaigners for historical accuracy – Robert Faurisson.

Paul Fromm – ‘Invading Our Lands; Silencing Our Voices’ — Talk to the London Forum, January 30, 2016

Paul Fromm – ‘Invading Our Lands; Silencing Our Voices’ — Talk to the London Forum, January 30, 2016

When any nation that is not part of ‘The Neo Con Empire’, for example China, silences the opposition to its governing regime by accusing its critics of ‘Hate’ and locking them away under ‘Hate Laws’ , the Western liberal media goes bezerk and fires off a volley of denunciations. However, the same media is hypocritically either strangely silent, or full of applause when its own liberal Western ruling regimes use the same methods and laws to imprison and silence their own dissidents. To be a dissident in the West these days is to be a defender of the true Western values and to be against the extermination of things we used to take for granted, such as: family; community; culture; nation, race and indeed the West itself. People of European origin in North America, as elsewhere in the world, are the victims of a cultural Marxist political and media elite dedicated to their replacement by massive Third World immigration. Simultaneously, there are strenuous efforts by the same elite to suppress criticism of this policy of dispossession by a variety of legal measures, (hate laws, etc.), media boycott and social sanctions for dissenters. Paul Fromm speaks extensively on immigration and free speech issues worldwide. He heads the Canada First Immigration Reform Committee and The Canadian Association for Free Expression. He has battled Canada’s oppressive internet censors and supported Ernst Zundel and David Irving. For the past four years, he has been media spokesman for the European American Heritage Festival, held annually in late October in Pulaski, Tennessee. He has a daily one hour commentary show on This autumn he covered the 12-day trial of Arthur Topham, (, who was charged with promoting “hate” under Canada’s notorious “hate law”.– Jez Turnner, London Forum.

Hear Special Interview With Jez Turner, Organizer of the London Forum International Conference

Jez Turner organized the biggest London Forum yet this weekend in Central London featuring:

* Prof. Kevin Macdonald, U.S.A
* Publisher Mark Weber, IHR, U.S.A.
* Publisher Greg Johnson, U.S.A.
* Videographer Hugh MacDonald, Canada
* Publisher Paul Fromm, Canada
* Publisher and political prisoner Pedro Videla, Spain
* Javier Nichols, Author, President Wagner Society of Spain,

Jez will explain what is the London Forum — 5 years in existence — what it does and what its goals are.


Jez explains the poisonous anti-White atmosphere in London, England and the anti-White bias of the London Police.


Monday, April 13, 2015 on Paul Fromm’s “The Fighting Side of Me” Radio show on at 8:00 a.m., 4:00 p.m. and midnight — all of these times are EST.

A user's photo.