CAFE

Dedicated to Free Speech, Immigration Reform, and Restoring Political Sanity

CAFE

Monthly Archives: August 2019

Posted on by
Monika Schaefer on the Brian Ruhe Show: 18 Months More in Prisoner for Dissident Alfred Schaefer for Defending Himself in Court
 
Just received this bad news tonight from Alfred’s sister Monika. This is the brief video we just released:

Alfred Schaefer Receives 18 Months Additional Prison Time for Defending Himself!

https://www.bitchute.com/video/2mqWlxOFiMA1/

Please write to Alfred, a Canadian in prison in Germany.

Brian Ruhe
 
SEND A CARD OR SHORT LETTER TO THIS “MAN BEHIND THE WIRE”:

Alfred Schaefer
JVA Stadelheim
Stadelheimer Str 12
81549, Munich (München)
GERMANY

Political Prisoner Alfred Schaefer Gets 18-More Months in a German Jail for Defending Himself in Court

Posted on by

Political Prisoner Alfred Schaefer Gets 18-More Months in a German Jail for Defending Himself in Court

On Thursday Alfred was in court to face new charges for the crime of speaking in his defense during our trial last year. The prosecutor wanted 24 months, he received 18 months. The prosecutor says that is too light and is appealing. To be clear, these 18 months are in addition to the 38 months that he is already sentenced with.

The law says you cannot say XYZ, then in court you cannot explain how you reached your conclusions of XYZ, nor are you allowed to bring forth evidence to support your conclusions, because when you do, you do new crime because your words can be heard by the public in the gallery. That is what Alfred did. New crime committed in the public courtroom, while defending himself.

When history comes to you enforced by law, only one thing is for certain: it is a lie. Or perhaps you can explain things differently to me.

Love,
Monika

The case of Rhino Albino and other B.C. human rights complaints Earl’s Albino Rhino beer had been on offer for 25 years when the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal agreed to hear a complaint by a woman with albinism The label for Albino Rhino Ale made in 2012 for Earl’s Restaurant in Western Canada. Genna Buck Genna Buck August 8, 2019 5:17 PM EDT Filed under News Canada Comment Facebook Twitter Reddit Email More The B.C. Human Rights Tribunal has heard some offbeat complaints in its recent history, including a complaint about Albino Rhino beer and a waiter who said he was fired for being too French. Complaints have to be made within six months and many are resolved with mediation. They only proceed to a hearing if the tribunal rules that the complainant has a reasonable chance of succeeding. Here are some greatest hits: The Albino Rhino beer summit Ikponwosa Ero, the United Nations’ independent expert on the enjoyment of human rights by persons with albinism, addresses a press conference at the end of her official visit to Malawi on April 29, 2016. AMOS GUMULIRA/AFP/Getty Images In 2012, Ikponwosa Ero, a woman with albinism, launched a human rights complaint against Earl’s Restaurants in Vancouver because it had a beer called Albino Rhino on tap. The product had been on offer for 25 years at that point. The company claimed the rhyming name was intended to be “whimsical and fun” and denote that the beer was “rare and special,” like a white rhino, and was not intended to be discriminatory. People with albinism, which is genetic, are completely or partially missing the natural pigment in their skin, hair and eyes. They’re susceptible to vision problems and skin cancer. In some cultures around the world, they face threats of violence, discrimination and even murder. Ero originally went through the advocacy organization where she worked to try to get Earl’s to drop the name, but was unsuccessful. The B.C. Human Rights Tribunal agreed to hold a hearing, but instead the two parties managed to talk things out among themselves and Earl’s voluntarily agreed to phase out the branding. The restaurant put out a statement in early 2013 stating, “Like many Canadians we knew very little about the condition or the very real discrimination persons with albinism experience, both in Canada and around the world,” and agreed, “Persons with albinism are a stigmatized group that face prejudice and exclusion in many areas of Canadian society.” Not rude, just French When Guillame Rey, a server at a Vancouver Milestones restaurant, was fired from his job for rudeness in August 2017, he claimed it wasn’t his fault — he’s French. The professional manner Rey’s co-workers called “combative” and his employer described as “rude and disrespectful” was simply “direct and expressive” and totally within the norms in his home country of France, Rey claimed. He said firing him amounted to discrimination on the basis of place of origin — a creative interpretation of section 13 of the province’s Human Rights Code. Last year, the tribunal denied the restaurant’s application to have the case dismissed. It’s expected to proceed to a hearing. Is being called ‘creepy’ sexist and racist? Mokua Gichuru, a man whose use of the B.C. court system has been legally limited because of his long-established habit to sue over anything and everything, complained to the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal in 2016 because a Vancouver swing dancing club banned him for being “creepy.” This amounts to “blatant stereotyping” of older, black men interacting with younger women, and is discrimination on the basis of age, sex and race, Gichuru claimed. Though the tribunal has declined to hear the case twice, it may yet proceed to a hearing, as Gichuru said that directors of the club banned him from events in retaliation for his threat to make a human rights complaint. ‘Reorganizing her out of the workplace’ Many recent cases have pertained to issues of disability accommodation in the workplace. For example, in July the tribunal heard the case of Norma Graham, a woman with a mental disability who had worked for the payroll department at B.C. Transit since 1991. In 2014, the organization made the switch to an open-concept office, and Graham complained that she was no longer able to concentrate on her work because of noisy conversations taking place near her desk. She asked to have her workstation moved and was denied. She also provided a medical note, but ended up taking a two-year medical leave soon after. When she returned to work, she was shuffled between various positions. Graham alleged that she no longer received the benefits she had at her old job. BC Transit eventually decided she would not be able to return to the payroll department. Graham ended up taking medical leave again. The tribunal ruled that B.C. Transit had done enough to accommodate Graham. Though the decision states that it was “unfortunate” that Graham felt her employer was not acting in good faith, and instead “reorganizing her out of the workplace,” the complaint was dismissed.

Posted on by

The case of Rhino Albino and other B.C. human rights complaints

[The tyranny of human rights commissions. Enabled minorities oppress Canada’s dispossessed Majority.   Paul Fromm]

Earl’s Albino Rhino beer had been on offer for 25 years when the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal agreed to hear a complaint by a woman with albinism

The label for Albino Rhino Ale made in 2012 for Earl’s Restaurant in Western Canada.
Genna Buck
Genna Buck

The B.C. Human Rights Tribunal has heard some offbeat complaints in its recent history, including a complaint about Albino Rhino beer and a waiter who said he was fired for being too French.

Complaints have to be made within six months and many are resolved with mediation. They only proceed to a hearing if the tribunal rules that the complainant has a reasonable chance of succeeding.

Here are some greatest hits:

The Albino Rhino beer summit

Ikponwosa Ero, the United Nations’ independent expert on the enjoyment of human rights by persons with albinism, addresses a press conference at the end of her official visit to Malawi on April 29, 2016. AMOS GUMULIRA/AFP/Getty Images

In 2012, Ikponwosa Ero, a woman with albinism, launched a human rights complaint against Earl’s Restaurants in Vancouver because it had a beer called Albino Rhino on tap. The product had been on offer for 25 years at that point.

The company claimed the rhyming name was intended to be “whimsical and fun” and denote that the beer was “rare and special,” like a white rhino, and was not intended to be discriminatory. People with albinism, which is genetic, are completely or partially missing the natural pigment in their skin, hair and eyes. They’re susceptible to vision problems and skin cancer. In some cultures around the world, they face threats of violence, discrimination and even murder. Ero originally went through the advocacy organization where she worked to try to get Earl’s to drop the name, but was unsuccessful.

The B.C. Human Rights Tribunal agreed to hold a hearing, but instead the two parties managed to talk things out among themselves and Earl’s voluntarily agreed to phase out the branding. The restaurant put out a statement in early 2013 stating, “Like many Canadians we knew very little about the condition or the very real discrimination persons with albinism experience, both in Canada and around the world,” and agreed, “Persons with albinism are a stigmatized group that face prejudice and exclusion in many areas of Canadian society.”

Not rude, just French

When Guillame Rey, a server at a Vancouver Milestones restaurant, was fired from his job for rudeness in August 2017, he claimed it wasn’t his fault — he’s French.

The professional manner Rey’s co-workers called “combative” and his employer described as “rude and disrespectful” was simply “direct and expressive” and totally within the norms in his home country of France, Rey claimed. He said firing him amounted to discrimination on the basis of place of origin — a creative interpretation of section 13 of the province’s Human Rights Code.

Last year, the tribunal denied the restaurant’s application to have the case dismissed. It’s expected to proceed to a hearing.

Is being called ‘creepy’ sexist and racist?

Mokua Gichuru, a man whose use of the B.C. court system has been legally limited because of his long-established habit to sue over anything and everything, complained to the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal in 2016 because a Vancouver swing dancing club banned him for being “creepy.” This amounts to “blatant stereotyping” of older, black men interacting with younger women, and is discrimination on the basis of age, sex and race, Gichuru claimed.

Though the tribunal has declined to hear the case twice, it may yet proceed to a hearing, as Gichuru said that directors of the club banned him from events in retaliation for his threat to make a human rights complaint.

‘Reorganizing her out of the workplace’

Many recent cases have pertained to issues of disability accommodation in the workplace. For example, in July the tribunal heard the case of Norma Graham, a woman with a mental disability who had worked for the payroll department at B.C. Transit since 1991. In 2014, the organization made the switch to an open-concept office, and Graham complained that she was no longer able to concentrate on her work because of noisy conversations taking place near her desk. She asked to have her workstation moved and was denied. She also provided a medical note, but ended up taking a two-year medical leave soon after. When she returned to work, she was shuffled between various positions. Graham alleged that she no longer received the benefits she had at her old job. BC Transit eventually decided she would not be able to return to the payroll department. Graham ended up taking medical leave again. The tribunal ruled that B.C. Transit had done enough to accommodate Graham. Though the decision states that it was “unfortunate” that Graham felt her employer was not acting in good faith, and instead “reorganizing her out of the workplace,” the complaint was dismissed.

The War Zone in Jasper by Monika Schaefer (former political prisoner)

Posted on by

The War Zone in Jasper

by Monika Schaefer (former political prisoner)

10 Saturday, Aug 2019

n 9/11, busking, Canada, Free Speech, Germany, Holohoax, Jasper, Letter, Psychological Warfare, Ritual Defamation, Schaefer – Monika, The Jasper Local newspaper, Uncategorized, WW II Revisionism

≈ Leave a comment

I have often said that we are in a war, not a war of our choosing, but a war that has been foisted onto us by the self-declared enemy of humanity. In the absence of bombs, most people do not realize that we are in a war. It is a war of infiltration, subversion, contamination, demoralization, destruction from within. They conduct Psychological Warfare, by way of deception, political correctness, criminalization of speech, and ritual defamation of truth-tellers.

The Jews (and their minions) in Jasper seem to be ramping up their war against this truth-teller. Perhaps they cannot abide by the fact that I am having success, nor can they abide by the fact that I keep on talking. In fact, they are getting quite hysterical.

Two incidents happened just yesterday.

I posted an item for sale on the Jasper AB, Buy, Sell and Trade Facebook site. Immediately someone showed interest. Next came a comment by Jessica Gomes, “warning” people that this seller is the same person as…”convicted holocaust denier…” then she linked to an article all about me being jailed. Someone else commented back something to the effect of

hey, she may be fucked, but she is just selling a cheap bike. Let her sell the bike.

Jessica Gomes immediately responded with a pack of lies, about me stalking her, calling her the little Jewess, playing [the violin] in front of her shop for hours, harassing and threatening her. I responded with a comment asking her if she always just made up random stuff like that.

I had no idea what this woman even looked like! I do not know her – so all of that was simply fabricated out of her sick imagination. Once again, a Jew reveals herself to me – according to her own comment.

As an aside, I do recall that about two years ago she wrote a letter called Hate begins with Words to the editor of a newspaper called The Jasper Local. I wrote about it in an article called “Local Letters: an Inquisition”.

Wanting to take a screen shot I switched from the small pop-ups of these comments to the main screen, but just then the comment thread disappeared. The site’s admin must have noticed the inappropriate conversation.

Tired of being the punching bag, I decided to take action and went to the RCMP to make a complaint. The officer took my statement and listened to my story. Later that day I received a phone call from him telling me that “she won’t be doing THAT again!” She had been venting her anger, she told him. Well I was just selling a bicycle and she can take her anger and park it elsewhere. The officer agreed. The file was now put to rest, but she had been warned.

As if one daily adventure isn’t enough, my busking hour provided yet more entertainment – more than just music. The busking spot is in a small open square surrounded by shops on three sides and a passenger-pick-up zone in front. It has generally been an excellent spot for busking. On this day, I felt something was different. It felt strange. It felt as though there was an invisible hand at work, causing a state of unease. People walked by in zombie state, or veered away, evaded looking at me, as though I was not there. Except for children. They turned towards me, tugging at their parents hands. A few tourists crossed over from the other side of the street to greet me and chat, and those were absolutely normal and natural in their responses, just like any other day.

At the end of my hour, as I was packing up getting ready to leave, I spotted “the problem”. A very animated guy was talking to the tourists on the park bench near me, pointing at me, telling them

she is a convicted Nazi, she went to jail… bla bla bla

WHAT THE ?!?!

So this is how it is now! These Locals simply cannot stand it that I might be earning a penny or two – I have observed many a local leering at my open violin case full of money that the appreciative tourists have happily thrown in.

Mr. busy-body-animated-guy from yesterday unfortunately has no name – in my astonishment I forgot to ask him his name. A loud confrontation ensued. Many people stood transfixed; even the shop-keepers stepped out to see what the commotion was all about. The guy probably thought I would be embarrassed by what he was telling the tourists and that I would try to deny it and slink away. No such luck! I loudly questioned him,

is this the kind of world you want to live in, where people go to jail simply for speaking? Is this the kind of world you want to live in where we cannot talk about history, we cannot have discussion and debate, we cannot examine evidence, without risking incarceration? If so, we are all enslaved!

Then I marched right over to where he had sat down, and loudly challenged him to a debate. I asked him if he still believed the official story about 9/11 and the 19 Arabs with box-cutters. He blew up at that!

I have noticed this phenomenon recently that when you ask a Jew about 9/11 (I am assuming he is a Jew, or at the very least a Jew-helper – to put it mildly), they get really mad! It was the second time in two days that I encountered that anger when I brought up 9/11. Is it because they all KNOW that we ALL have that one figured out? And that we know that they know that we know…? ha ha, they just get angry!

He then shouted in my face,

Do you believe that 6 million Jews were gassed in the holocaust?

Laughing, I replied that there were not even 6 million Jews living in all of Europe at the time! He turned, as though victorious, to the crowd and screeched at them,

London Forum - Alfred Schaefer - 1907 Did six million Really Die? montage

See?! She doesn’t believe that 6 million Jews were killed by the Nazis!!!!!

He thought he had a “gotcha” moment, the way he was grandstanding hysterically. He pretended to win a big victory. Wow. It would be hilarious if it was not so serious. They paint me as the hater and the nutcase. If ever there was a demonstration of both those lovely characteristics, he certainly outdid himself yesterday. I think the last laugh was on him.

Silenced by Google? Worker claims he was put on leave for speaking out

Posted on by

Silenced by Google?

Worker claims he was put on leave for speaking out

[MORE IDEOLOGICAL TYRANNY BY THE LEFTISTS IN SILICON VALLEY.]

  • Toronto Sun
  • GRAEME GORDON
GREG COPPOLA

A Google employee was summarily put on administrative leave for speaking out against the tech giant’s leftwing ideologues allegedly having their paws all over the company’s algorithms in order to slice out conservative information and people they don’t like.

Freshly suspended senior Google engineer Greg Coppola spoke out publicly in an interview with conservative investigative news outlet Project Veritas.

“Are we going to continue to think for ourselves or are we just going to let the biggest tech companies decide who wins every election from now on?” he said in the bombshell interview.

“I look at search and I look at Google News and I see what it’s doing and I see Google executives go to Congress and say that it’s not manipulated.

“It’s not political. And I’m just so sure that’s not true.”

This is not the first time a Google employee has charged them with having a left-wing bias.

Last year, James Damore was fired for an internal document he authored trying to explain why there were less women in tech after the company was looking for feedback.

He then started legal proceedings against the company claiming it has “left biases” and is “alienating conservatives” by using “discriminatory practices.”

Shortly after Coppola came forward at the end of July, another Google employee fired in 2018 told Wall Street Journal he was let go for what he claims was advocating for conservative employees he says were bullied.

Google told The Hill he was fired for “misusing company equipment.”

Other critics have found biases in its search engine through their research.

Last year, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg told Congress Silicon Valley is “an extremely left-leaning place.”

In mid-july, U.S. President Trump held a social media summit in which he accused the tech giants of censoring conservatives.

In Canada, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called for more censorship of “hate speech” and “misinformation” through the introduction of a digital charter.

The Liberal government has close ties to top Canadian execs at the big tech companies, including Google.

As the 2019 federal election kicks off in mere weeks, the role big tech plays in the flow of information to everyday Canadians looms large.

Twitter Censors Sen. Mitch McConnell’s Report of Antifa Mob Attack on his Louisville Home

Posted on by
 Twitter Censors Sen. Mitch McConnell’s Report of Antifa Mob Attack on his Louisville Home

🍁

Retweeted

Ryan Saavedra
@RealSaavedra

Here are the messages that McConnell’s re-election campaign received from Twitter telling them that they could not expose the hatred coming from the Democrat Party directed at McConnell

Image

Image

Image
McConnell’s re-election campaign,

@Team_Mitch

, also shared the video, presumably to show the hatred and violence from the Democrats Twitter also suspended their account for sharing the video Again: Twitter suspended McConnell’s campaign for showing the hatred directed at him

Ryan Saavedra
@RealSaavedra

McConnell’s re-election campaign,

@Team_Mitch

, also shared the video, presumably to show the hatred and violence from the Democrats Twitter also suspended their account for sharing the video Again: Twitter suspended McConnell’s campaign for showing the hatred directed at him

SILICON VALLEY CENSORS DROP 8CHAN & INTERFERE WITH PUBLIC’S RIGHT TO READ ALLEGED SHOOTERS’ MANIFESTOS

Posted on by

SILICON VALLEY CENSORS DROP 8CHAN & INTERFERE WITH PUBLIC’S RIGHT TO READ ALLEGED SHOOTERS’ MANIFESTOS

Security provider drops imageboard 8chan used to distribute El Paso & Christchurch manifestos

Published time: 5 Aug, 2019 06:51 Edited time: 5 Aug, 2019 12:13
Get short URL
RT
Internet security company Cloudflare has dropped the unmoderated anonymous 8chan forum, which has become a source of hate-filled manifestos left by mass shooters, including the El Paso gunman.

In a blog post on Sunday, Cloudflare, which is based in San-Francisco, said it would discontinue its services to 8chan, an imageboard that has come under intense scrutiny for hosting several “manifestos” penned by mass shooters.

The company said it appears that the El Paso attacker posted his four-page “screed” to the site “immediately before beginning his terrifying attack on the El Paso Walmart killing 20 people.”

While 8chan’s role in the El Paso massacre was the last straw, Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince said it was a chain of events that forced the company to boot 8chan, one of which is the role the New Zealand mosque attack played in triggering the recent rampage.

\ “The El Paso shooter specifically referenced the Christchurch incident and appears to have been inspired by the largely unmoderated discussions on 8chan which glorified the previous massacre,” he wrote.

Prince argued that it does not matter whether or not 8chan violated any laws by allowing radical ideas to thrive on its platform; it was enough that they “have created an environment that revels in violating its spirit.”

“The rationale is simple: they have proven themselves to be lawless and that lawlessness has caused multiple tragic deaths.”

It was still a hard decision for the company to make as it seeks to treat all of its 19 million customers without bias, but, according to Prince, 8chan crossed the line by “directly” inspiring the tragedy.

READ MORE: American gun laws: Why the issues are not as clear-cut as they first apr

Prince said that Cloudfare seeks to shield itself from public outrage, adding that the move will not solve the bigger problem of sites propagating violence. The company’s decision to dump the white nationalist site Daily Stormer two years ago did not lead to its demise, but on the contrary, only fired up its base, he noted.

“I have little doubt we’ll see the same happen with 8chan. While removing 8chan from our network takes heat off of us, it does nothing to address why hateful sites fester online. It does nothing to address why mass shootings occur.”

He argued that it’s ultimately not up to a private company to decide “what content is good and bad” and how it should be handled, and called on the government to step up its role in internet regulation.

Journalist Christie Blatchford Wins the George Jonas Freedom Award for 2019

Posted on by

Journalist Christie Blatchford Wins the George Jonas Freedom Award for

TORONTO. June 14, 2019. Paul Fromm, the Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression, hails her as “the best courtroom reporter in Canada.” Some months back, she wrote a brilliant piece eviscerating the Kinsellas, Warren and Lisa, who have been tormenters of the satirical tabloid YOUR WARD NEWS, and were in the process of losing an “uttering threats” case against editor Dr. James Sears.

 

Tonight, Christie Blatchford became the second recipient of the George Jonas Freedom Award at a dinner in midtown Toronto sponsored by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Centre Director John Carpay warned: “Political correctness in Canada has gone too far. Freedoms can be enshrined in a constitution but they must be enshrined in our hearts. Freedom is under serious attack in Canada today.” And, he concluded, “the biggest danger is not to realize we are in a war to destroy society from within.”

 

Introducing winner Christie Blatchford was Marie Henein who had just beaten the federal government to a standstill in the case of Vice Admiral Mark Norman.The Crown had been shamed into withdrawing the charges after putting the admiral through years of legal and financial hell.

 

“Christie is unmanageable,” Henein praised. “In four decades in our courts, sometimes at high personal cost, she has provided a critical, informed and reasoned view of our justice system. Christie, you are a barometer of what many of us should be thinking about in our legal work.”

 

Accepting the award, Miss Blatchford, who now writes for the National Post, mentioned pro-life campaigner “Linda Gibbons who has done a total of 11 years in jail for carrying s small sign opposing abortion” outside Toronto abortion clinics.

 

And, she added, “I’m concerned about difficulties in getting bail. Also, the “#me too” movement is a genuine threat.” Human rights hearings, she warned, “are unbearably unfair.” On a sombre note, she concluded her acceptance asking, “which of our federal leaders will defend free speech? None of the above.”


Notice: ob_end_flush(): Failed to send buffer of zlib output compression (0) in /home/public/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5373