Nepean Redskins to Change Their Name After Rights Complaint Blackmail — Come On Hudak: Promise to Abolish the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Posted on September 28, 2013 by admin

Whatever use they might have served in the distant past — and I question that — human rights commissions have outlived their purpose. They provide privileged minorities a tool to harass and blackmail the majority. In a move that may well cost $100,000, the Nepean Redskins will change their name. One Ottawa Indian, musician Ian Campeau, found the name “offensive” and, when the team wouldn’t budge, filed a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Commission.

It cost him nothing but a letter. The Commission will do the legal work for him, If he loses, he pays no costs or penalty. From the get-go, all the costs are on the tream,. They must hire a lawyer, present a case, answer motions and correspondence and, eventually, appear before a tribunal. Even if they, win, they are out thousands, likely several tens of thousands of dollars. Human rights tribunal members are often highly biased in favour of minorities. They are part of the human rights industry. The odds are stacked against the victims.

The National Post (September 20, 2013) reports the latest victory for minority blackmail and bullying enabled by the skanky creature called the Ontario Human Rights Commission: ” An Ottawa amateur football club — the Nepean Redskins — is changing its name and logo under mounting pressure from critics who say it’s a racist reference to aboriginals. The team’s president Steve Dean said Thursday the change is voluntary and will be officially announced Friday.The team “understands that the current name is offensive to some, and thus divisive to our community,” he said in a statement. …

Dave Chan for National Post/Files

The decision comes weeks after an Ottawa musician, Ian Campeau of the band A Tribe Called Red, filed a human rights complaint alleging the name is racist. Campeau hailed the news Thursday, posting a triumphant “WE DID IT!!!” on Twitter.

Not all were on board with the switch, with a few on social media accusing the team of giving into political correctness. Dean said the club will choose a new name, logo and colours at the end of the football season in November. Parents, players and volunteers will be consulted, he said. The full transformation is expected to cost more than US$100,000 and ‘may take a number of years to complete,’ he said.”

An earlier National Post story (September 3, 2013) explained: “Arguing that the name of the Nepean Redskins, an Ontario amateur football club, is ‘offensive, non-inclusive and dehumanizing,’ an Ottawa man announced Tuesday he is approaching the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal to force a name change. … Ian Campeau, a member of the Nippissing First Nation and a DJ with the aboriginal electronic music group A Tribe Called Red.” He had led a two year campaign of e-mails and media agitation to try to force the name change.”

Incidentally, doesn’t Campeau’s group’s name “A Tribe Called Red” call attention to race and seem, well, uh, a little bit racist.?

The September 3 National Post story, but not the version still on-line, made extensive reference to local Ottawa Indian groups who had no problem with the name “Redskins” for the amateur football team, and saw no offence in in/ The Ottawa Citizen (September 3, 2013) report notes: “The National Capital Amateur Football Association has resisted the name change, claiming that it has consulted the native community and received support for continuing to use the name.

Association and Redskins president Steve Dean said: ‘This is a small not-for-profit entity doing work in the community with a name that has been around for 30 years. It was never our intention or objective to offend anyone.’ The football league has aboriginal players and coaches, added Dean.”

The threat of burying an amateur team for children with legal costs gives an unfair blackmail hammer to privileged minorities.

“About 550 kids and volunteers run the flag, tackle, touch and cheer programmes with the club. … It left the youth football club facing an expensive transition or a lengthy, high-profile legal battle.” (Globe and Mail, September 21, 2013)

The time has come to rid the province of this meddling and unfair institution. Ontario Progressive Conservative Party leader Tim Hudak promised to do just that when he was running for his party’s leadership in 2009. So, too, did one of his rivals, and eventual ally in the final vote, MPP Randy Hillier.

The Toronto Star (September 21, 2009) reported: “Hudak, who has followed long-shot candidate Randy Hillier’s lead on calling for the rights body to be scrapped, … emphasized Tories are profoundly concerned about the rights body, which has become a bête noire in conservative circles where it is perceived as infringing on individual and press liberties.

‘Everywhere I go in this province, speaking to PC members, they want to see changes to the human rights commission, because it doesn’t serve victims well nor those who have been accused,’ said the Niagara West-Glanbrook MPP.’When (Tories) see somebody like (chief human rights commissioner) Barbara Hall out championing for the ability to censor the media while those that have real cases of discrimination languish on waiting lists, they want to see changes,’ he said.”

Regrettably, as soon as he’d clutched the leadership prize, Hudak, apparently, heard from the Big Boys and shelved his promise. It’s time, in light of this latest outrage, for him to pledge himself to purging this Province of the bullying institution.

Paul Fromm

Director

CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION

Greetings from CAFE To Australian League of Rights New Times Dinner

Posted on September 28, 2013 by admin

Greetings from CAFE To Australian League of Rights New Times Dinner

I had the honour of meeting your founder, the late Eric Butler, on several of his visits to Canada. As well, I worked, both in Canada and on a speaking tour of Australia in 2005, with his son and my friend, the late Phillip Butler. It was my honour to be one of your guest speakers at the New Times Dinner in 2005.

On behalf of the many Canadians who share your dedication to real immigration reform to protect the European character of our countries, to freedom of speech, and to economic reform and justice as outlined in the works of Major C.H. Douglas, I send my greetings and best wishes for a most successful 67th New Times Dinner.

Eric Butler, Australian League of Rights

Major C.H. Douglas, Founder of Social Credit

Paul Fromm

Director

Canadian Association for Free Expression

Dave Lindsay Links Property Rights & Freedom of Speech

Posted on September 26, 2013 by admin

Dave Lindsay Links Property Rights & Freedom of Speech

REXDALE. September 4, 2013. In a wide-ranging speech tonight, Dave “The Unlicensed Man” Lindsay, who has appeared in more than 300 courts cases challenging Canada’s Income Tax Law and assisting other rebels fighting for individual rights, linked property rights and freedom of speech.

“I haven’t filed an income tax return since 1996,” Mr. Lindsay explained, ” because it is against Christian principles, it contradicts the Coronation Oath and it imposes usury. The courts won’t touch the Coronation Oath because, if they did, 80 per cent our laws would be ruled illegal.”

In his own failure to file case, he explained: “I was convicted and sentenced to 60 days in jail in Kamloops. My case seems to be the first in Canada where the accused was not fined $1,000 and issued with a compliance order. For me, it’s not a matter of the money. I probably made less than $10,000 in each of those years.”

Perhaps, an explanation for the judge’s unusual sentence is that the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) “is trying to keep me out of court as an agent for defendants.” Last year a judge acknowledged: “Mr. Lindsay’s arguments are thorough and competent.”

“The Crown is supposed to be independent,” he said with disgust, “but they are just thugs for CRA!”

Photo: Dave Lindsay Links Property Rights & Freedom of Speech

REXDALE. September 4, 2013. In a wide-ranging speech tonight, Dave "The Unlicensed Man" Lindsay, who has appeared in more than 300 courts cases challenging Canada's Income Tax Law and assisting other rebels fighting for individual rights, linked property rights and freedom of speech.

"I haven't filed an income tax return since 1996," Mr. Lindsay explained, " because it is against Christian principles, it contradicts the Coronation Oath and it imposes usury. The courts won't touch the Coronation Oath because, if they did, 80 per cent our laws would be ruled illegal."

In his own failure to file case, he explained: "I was convicted and sentenced to 60 days in jail in Kamloops. My case seems to be the first in Canada where the accused was not fined $1,000 and issued with a compliance order. For me, it's not a matter of the money. I probably made less than $10,000 in each of those years."

Perhaps, an explanation for the judge's unusual sentence is that the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) "is trying to keep me out of court as an agent for defendants." Last year a judge acknowledged: "Mr. Lindsay's arguments are thorough and competent."

"The Crown is supposed to be independent," he said with disgust, "but they are just thugs for CRA!"

Since 9/11, he explained, there has been a massive erosion of our rights: "The State is waging a constant attack on our rights."

Holding a pen aloft, Mr. Lindsay explained: "I have the right to use and dispose of this pen. You don't have to possess something for it to be your property," he added, referring to someone with a package of pea or carrot seeds who would have the right to the produce these tiny seeds might grow.

Quoting Bastiat in The Law, Mr. Lindsay reminded his audience: "God created us with physical and moral life and faculties. We use our faculties to develop resources."

"When you come up with thoughts, you have the right to express them. All the information in your brain is yours -- it's your property. The state has no right to interfere with the exchange of your property -- your ideas via e-mail, or writing or phone,"

The state, he added, "has no lawful right to spy on us and our intellectual property."

He noted that a Supreme Court of Canada decision stated: "The Constitution Act of 1982 is not exhaustive;" there are other rights not in there.

"You have the right to use your intellectual thoughts. You cannot fully exercise this right if you're worried you're being spied on by government. Laws allowing the state to spy on us is a trespass on our property. We should not even have to prove damages in this regard," Mr. Lindsay added.

"When you talk to somebody, you are are exercising your right to communicate your property. We have a constitutional right to our ideas and a right to communicate these thoughts as they are our property. The Coronation Oath imposes a constitutional obligation on the Queen not to proclaim laws which violate our rights to property, Privacy is one of the most important things we have. It is absolutely critical to watch what you say in e-mail," he warned, "until we can stop government spying on us."

In referring to Richard Warman's numerous anti-free speech complaints about posting on the Internet, Mr. Lindsay concluded: "I have a constitutional right to hate," because I have a constitutional right to my property-- to my thoughts, whatever they might be.

Since 9/11, he explained, there has been a massive erosion of our rights: “The State is waging a constant attack on our rights.”

Holding a pen aloft, Mr. Lindsay explained: “I have the right to use and dispose of this pen. You don’t have to possess something for it to be your property,” he added, referring to someone with a package of pea or carrot seeds who would have the right to the produce these tiny seeds might grow.

Quoting Bastiat in The Law, Mr. Lindsay reminded his audience: “God created us with physical and moral life and faculties. We use our faculties to develop resources.”

“When you come up with thoughts, you have the right to express them. All the information in your brain is yours — it’s your property. The state has no right to interfere with the exchange of your property — your ideas via e-mail, or writing or phone,”

The state, he added, “has no lawful right to spy on us and our intellectual property.”

He noted that a Supreme Court of Canada decision stated: “The Constitution Act of 1982 is not exhaustive;” there are other rights not in there.

“You have the right to use your intellectual thoughts. You cannot fully exercise this right if you’re worried you’re being spied on by government. Laws allowing the state to spy on us is a trespass on our property. We should not even have to prove damages in this regard,” Mr. Lindsay added.

“When you talk to somebody, you are are exercising your right to communicate your property. We have a constitutional right to our ideas and a right to communicate these thoughts as they are our property. The Coronation Oath imposes a constitutional obligation on the Queen not to proclaim laws which violate our rights to property, Privacy is one of the most important things we have. It is absolutely critical to watch what you say in e-mail,” he warned, “until we can stop government spying on us.”

In referring to Richard Warman’s numerous anti-free speech complaints about posting on the Internet, Mr. Lindsay concluded: “I have a constitutional right to hate,” because I have a constitutional right to my property– to my thoughts, whatever they might be.

MEMO TO VLADIMIR PUTIN RE: G-20 MEETING

Posted on September 6, 2013 by admin

MEMO TO VLADIMIR PUTIN RE: G-20 MEETING

To: President Vladimir Putin, President of Russia

From: Paul Fromm, Director Canadian Association for Free Expression

Re: Complaints About Your Crackdown on Homosexual Propaganda

Dear President Putin:

I know you’re busy hosting the meeting of the G-20 leaders n St. Petersburg. So, I’ll keep this memo brief.

Along with discussion of economic issues and the planned U.S. aggression against Syria, you may also find yourself criticized for recent legislation passed by the Duma restricting homosexual propaganda and recruitment. I know homosexuality is not the issue. It is legal in Russia. These people can pursue their peculiar practices in private. However, consistent with your country’s Christian traditions, your parliament does not want to see the sort of recruitment and aggressive propagandizing that we see in Canada and the U.S. That is your right as a sovereign country.

The restrictions on homosexual propagandizing have attracted much criticism in the West in the run-up to your hosting next year’s Winter Olympics in Sochi.

At this Summit, you may run into Canada’s Foreign Minister John Baird. He is an outspoken ultra Zionist and sometimes makes one think he is really the Honourable Member for Tel Aviv, rather than a minister charged with promoting Canada’s interests.

Even though many in the Conservative caucus are strong Christians, the Canadian government has recently become a key promoter of the homosexual agenda. Baird is a preachy pest and may try to bend your ear with criticisms of your country’s law against homosexual propaganda. He’ll tell you pompously how Canada believes in free speech.

I don’t know the Russian words for “hypocrite” and “phony”, but they would certainly fit. After he tells you all about Canada’s commitment to free speech, ask him: “What about Brad Love, Arthur Topham, and Craig Cobb, Mr. Minister? Aren’t they your political prisoners facing prison solely for the non-violent expression of their political or religious views? Don’t you have a ‘hate propaganda’ law that seeks to protect privileged groups from criticism?”

And just to send the canting finger-wagger on his way, you can give him a copy of this “information” laying charges against Craig Cobb under Canada’s notorious “hate law”: “Paul Craig Cobb between the 10th day of January, 2010, and the 18th day of June, 2010, in the Province of British Columbia by communicating statements other than in private conversation did willfully promote hatred against identifiable groups, namely, Jewish people, Black people and non-White people contrary to Sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code.”

It’s not even clear, from this information sworn out by Det/Cst. Terry Wilson commissar of the “hate squad” on December 31, 2010, how or where Mr. Cobb is supposed to have communicated these alleged statements. He is a dual U.S. and Canadian citizen. He went into political exile in the U.S. to stay beyond the reach of Canada’s thought control police.

So, if John Baird starts any of his free speech is “a core Canadian value” cong and dance, call his bluff and give him the Russian equivalent of a big old horse laugh!

CAFE Accepted As Intervener in McCorkill Case

Posted on September 4, 2013 by admin

CAFE Accepted As Intervener in McCorkill Case
St. John, New Brunswick, September 3, 2013. The Canadian Association for Free Expression was granted intervener status by the New Brunswick Court of Queen’s bench. CAFE will be supporting the …Estate of the late Robert McCorkill who left a large legacy to the National Alliance. This legacy has been challenged by McCorkill’s estranged sister Isabelle, who came forward nine years after his death after a U.S. anti-free speech group the Southern Poverty Law Centre of Montgomery, AL sought to prevent the NA from receiving the legacy.

“This is an incredibly crucial case,” says CAFE Director Paul Fromm. “The enemies of free speech, with significant Establishment assistance, are seeking to reach the skeletal fingers of political correctness even into the disposition of a person’s private property.”

Supporting Isabelle McCorkell’s [yes, there’s a spelling difference] motion to negate the legacy are the Attorney General of New Brunswick, the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith and the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs. All are arguing that the bequest is contrary to the public good.

Marc-Antoine Chiasson, Isabelle McCorkell’s lawyer has said: “Hate speech in Canada is criminally prohibited. Secondly, Canada has signed on to numerous international conventions with the specific goal and aim to get rid of hate speech, hate groups and the financing of hate groups.” We signed on to some poxy agreement preventing donations to groups the biased SPLC says are “hate groups”?

” The National Alliance is a perfectly legal group in the U.S.” Paul Fromm points out. “The New Brunswick Attorney General is arguing that the bequest is contrary to the public good or public policy. Abortion on demand is the laws of the land. Would a bequest to a pro-life group be ruled contrary to the public good? The implications of this case are frightening!”

Interestingly, neither of the parties, the petitioner Isabelle McCorkell or John Hughes lawyer for Fred Streed, executor of the estate, were in Court this morning, CAFE lawyer Andy Lodge reported. Mr. Hughes had written to the Court giving his consent to CAFE’s intervention.

Lawyers for the other three interveners did attend Court. The New Brunswick Attorney General indicated that he neither consented nor opposed CAFE;s participation. The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs indicated it did not oppose CAFE’s intervention, but did “want to go on the record as opposing any substantive evidence CAFE might submit and CAFE’s arguments.” It might be noted that these arguments are still to be filed.
____________________________________________________________

Please Help CAFE Defend Free Speech from Those Who Would Submit Beneficiaries to Some Politically Correct Litmus Test

Time is of the essence. The case goes to Court September 10. Our lawyer has had to devote a good deal of time (and our money!) getting up to speed on this case, We are being billed weekly! We anticipate that the intervention could cost up to $20,000. WE NEED YOUR HELP AND, NOT TO BE PUSHY, WE NEED IS QUICKLY!

CAFE, Box 332, Rexdale, Ontario, M9W 5L3
__ Here’s my donation of ____to help CAFÉ’s autumn programme, including the intervention in the McCorkill legacy case.
__ Please renew my subscription for 2013 to the Free Speech Monitor ($15).

Please charge ______myVISA#________________________________________________________________

Expiry date: __________ Signature:_______________________________________________________________

Name:____________________________________________________________________________________
Address:__________________________________________________________________________________

CAFE Seeks Intervener Status Today in McCorkill Will Case to Protect Private Property & to Defend Free Speech

Posted on September 3, 2013 by admin

CAFE Seeks Intervener Status Today in McCorkill Will Case to Protect Private Property & to Defend Free Speech

Cause Number: S/M/49/13
…

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF NEW BRUNSWICK

TRIAL DIVISION

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF SAINT JOHN

BETWEEN:

ISABELLE ROSE MCCORKILL,

PLAINTIFF

– and –

FRED GENE STREED, Executor of the ESTATE OF HARRY ROBERT MCCORKILL (a.k.a MCCORKELL), deceased,

DEFENDENT

LEAGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF B’NAI BRITH CANADA, CENTRE for ISREAL and JEWISH AFFAIRS, the PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK, as represented by the ATTORNEY GENERAL,

INTERVENORS

THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION,

INTENDED INTERVENOR

Numéro de dossier:

COUR DU BANC DE LA REINE DU NOUVEAU-BRUNSWICK

DIVISION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE

CIRCONSCRIPTION JUDICIAIRE DE

ENTRE:

DEMANDEUR

– et –

DÉFENDEUR

NOTICE OF MOTION
(Form 37A) AVIS DE MOTION

(Formule 37A)

TO: Marc-Antoine Chiasson

MCINNES COOPER

Blue Cross Centre

644 Main Street, South Tower

Suite 400

P.O. Box 1368

Moncton, N.B. E1C 8T6

Solicitor for the Applicant,

Isabelle Rose McCorkill

AND TO: John Hughes

BARRISTER & SOLICTOR

145 Whitfield Trites Road

P.O. Box 29072

Moncton, NB

E1G 4R3

Solicitor for the Respondent,

Fred Gene Street, Executor of the Estate of Harry Robert McCorkill (a.k.a. McCorkell), deceased

AND TO: Catherine A. Fawcett

LAWSON CREAMER

801-133 Prince William Street

Saint John, N.B. E2L 2B5

Solicitor for the Intervenor,

League for Human Rights of B’Nai Brith Canada

AND TO: Danys R. X. Delaquis

CANTY LUTZ DELAQUIS GRANT

43 Broad Street

P.O. Box 6488, Stn A

Saint John, N.B. E2L 4R9

Solicitor for the Intervenor,

The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs

AND TO: Richard A. Williams

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Legal Services Branch

P.O. Box 6000

Fredericton, N.B. E1G 4R3

Solicitor for the Intervenor,

Province of New Brunswick, as represented by the Attorney General
DESTINATAIRE:

The Intended Intervenor, the Canadian Association for Free Expression, will apply to the Court at 10 Peel Plaza, Saint John, New Brunswick, on the 3rd day of September, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. for an order that:

The time for service of the within motion be abridged pursuant to Rule 3.02 of the Rules of Court;

That the Canadian Association for Free Expression be added as an intervenor pursuant to Rule 15.02 of the Rules of Court;

In the alternative, that the Canadian Association for Free Expression be granted leave to intervene in the proceedings as a friend of the court for the purpose of rendering assistance to the court pursuant to Rule 15.03 of the Rules of Court; and

Such further and other relief as this Honourable Court deems just.

The grounds to be argued in support of the Motion are:

A hearing was scheduled to take place on July 31st, 2013 before this honourable Court prior to the Canadian Association for Free Expression being able to retain counsel to apply for intervenor status;

The Canadian Association for Free Expression has an interest in the subject matter of these proceedings;

The Canadian Association for Free Expression may be adversely affected by the Court’s decision in the matter;
The granting of intervenor status to the Canadian Association for Free Expression will not unduly delay or prejudice the determination of the rights of the parties;
This matter involves questions of public policy and public interests;
Such further and other grounds as the Canadian Association for Free Expression may argue at or before the proceedings.

The Canadian Association for Free Expression will rely on Rules 1.03(2), 1.08, 3.02, 15.02, 15.03, 7, 39 and 59 of the New Brunswick Rules of Court.
Les défendeurs demanderont à la Cour située à 770, rue Main, Moncton, N.-B, le ________ de _______________, à ________ d’ordonner:

Upon the hearing of the motion the following affidavits or other documentary evidence will be presented:

1. Affidavit of Paul Fromm dated August _____, 2013
À l’audition de la motion, les affidavits ou les autres preuves littérales suivantes seront présentées:

You are advised that:

Sachez que:

(a) you are entitled to issue documents and present at the hearing in English or French or both;
a) vous avez le droit d’émettre des documents et de présenter votre preuve à l’audience en français, en anglais ou dans les deux langues;

(b) the defendant intends to proceed in the English language;
b) les défendeurs ont l’intention d’utiliser la langue française; et

(c) if you intend to proceed in the other official language, an interpreter may be required and you must so advise the clerk at least 5 days before the hearing.
c) si vous avez l’intention d’utiliser l’autre langue officielle, les services d’un interprète pourront être requis et vous devrez en aviser le greffier au moins 5 jours avant l’audience.

DATED at Saint John, NB this ___ day of August, 2013.

____________________________________ Andy W. Lodge

BLR LAW
Solicitors for the Intended Intervenor

The Canadian Association for Free Expression
FAIT à Saint John, N.-B., le _____ jour de _____________ 2007.

BLR LAW

20 Marr Road, Suite 200

P.O. Box 4790

Rothesay, N.B. E2E 5X5

Telephone: (506) 848-4444

Facsimile: (506) 848-4445

File No.: 17242-1

Cause Number: S/M/49/13

IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF NEW BRUNSWICK

TRIAL DIVISION

JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF SAINT JOHN

BETWEEN:

ISABELLE ROSE MCCORKILL,

PLAINTIFF

– and –

FRED GENE STREED, Executor of the ESTATE OF HARRY ROBERT MCCORKILL (a.k.a MCCORKELL), deceased,

DEFENDENT

LEAGUE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF B’NAI BRITH CANADA, CENTRE for ISREAL and JEWISH AFFAIRS, the PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK, as represented by the ATTORNEY GENERAL,

INTERVENORS

THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION,

INTENDED INTERVENOR

Numéro de dossier:

COUR DU BANC DE LA REINE DU NOUVEAU-BRUNSWICK

DIVISION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE

CIRCONSCRIPTION JUDICIAIRE DE

ENTRE:

DEMANDEUR

– et –

DÉFENDEUR

NOTICE OF MOTION
(Form 37A) AVIS DE MOTION

(Formule 37A)

TO: Marc-Antoine Chiasson

MCINNES COOPER

Blue Cross Centre

644 Main Street, South Tower

Suite 400

P.O. Box 1368

Moncton, N.B. E1C 8T6

Solicitor for the Applicant,

Isabelle Rose McCorkill

AND TO: John Hughes

BARRISTER & SOLICTOR

145 Whitfield Trites Road

P.O. Box 29072

Moncton, NB

E1G 4R3

Solicitor for the Respondent,

Fred Gene Street, Executor of the Estate of Harry Robert McCorkill (a.k.a. McCorkell), deceased

AND TO: Catherine A. Fawcett

LAWSON CREAMER

801-133 Prince William Street

Saint John, N.B. E2L 2B5

Solicitor for the Intervenor,

League for Human Rights of B’Nai Brith Canada

AND TO: Danys R. X. Delaquis

CANTY LUTZ DELAQUIS GRANT

43 Broad Street

P.O. Box 6488, Stn A

Saint John, N.B. E2L 4R9

Solicitor for the Intervenor,

The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs

AND TO: Richard A. Williams

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Legal Services Branch

P.O. Box 6000

Fredericton, N.B. E1G 4R3

Solicitor for the Intervenor,

Province of New Brunswick, as represented by the Attorney General
DESTINATAIRE:

The time for service of the within motion be abridged pursuant to Rule 3.02 of the Rules of Court;

That the Canadian Association for Free Expression be added as an intervenor pursuant to Rule 15.02 of the Rules of Court;

Such further and other relief as this Honourable Court deems just.

The grounds to be argued in support of the Motion are:

The Canadian Association for Free Expression has an interest in the subject matter of these proceedings;

Upon the hearing of the motion the following affidavits or other documentary evidence will be presented:

1. Affidavit of Paul Fromm dated August _____, 2013
À l’audition de la motion, les affidavits ou les autres preuves littérales suivantes seront présentées:

You are advised that:

Sachez que:

(b) the defendant intends to proceed in the English language;
b) les défendeurs ont l’intention d’utiliser la langue française; et

DATED at Saint John, NB this ___ day of August, 2013.

____________________________________ Andy W. Lodge

BLR LAW
Solicitors for the Intended Intervenor

The Canadian Association for Free Expression
FAIT à Saint John, N.-B., le _____ jour de _____________ 2007.

BLR LAW

20 Marr Road, Suite 200

P.O. Box 4790

Rothesay, N.B. E2E 5X5

Telephone: (506) 848-4444

Facsimile: (506) 848-4445

File No.: 17242-1See More

Like · · Unfollow Post · Share

Zionist Groups Seek to Suppress Pro-Palestinian Transit Ads in Vancouver

Posted on August 30, 2013 by admin

Zionist Groups Seek to Suppress Pro-Palestinian Transit Ads in Vancouver

[Notice how any criticism of Israel is seen as an incitement to hate. By that reasoning, any Indian demands for land claims settlements implies criticism of Whites and might lead to hatred, In like a dirty shirt, threatening a lawsuit and lobbying hard to suppress criticism of Israel, as usual are organized Jewish groups, among the most persistent censorship and thought control groups in Canada: “Jewish groups in Vancouver say they are considering suing TransLink for accepting controversial political advertisements showing the “disappearance of Palestine due to Israeli occupation over the past 66 years. … Jewish leaders including Mitchell Gropper, chair of the Jewish Federation of Greater Vancouver, called the ads a provocative attack on Jewish people that will incite hatred. “This is a grave concern to our community at large, because the ads make use of the buses unwelcome and unsafe,” Gropper said, noting that terrorist attacks in Israel often target buses.

‘I don’t think I’ve ever seen ads on our TransLink system that attack a section of our society. If the transit system will be used to attack Israel and the Jewish people, who is next?’

Gropper, a Vancouver lawyer, said his group went to the “highest levels” of TransLink and argued the Palestine ads should be rejected, but they were told TransLink must accept the ads for legal reasons. … In 2006 TransLink lost a decision to the B.C. Court of Appeal, after trying to refuse political advertisements from the B.C. Teachers Federation of Students. TransLink’s policy of rejecting partisan ads and campaigns likely to cause offence or controversy was overturned.

In the decision, Madam Justice Prowse wrote that B.C. Transit and TransLink ‘sought to prohibit political advertising precisely because it was political. Their aim was to prevent the appellants from exercising their right to freedom of political expression, although they were content to entertain commercial expression.’

The ad campaign cost $15,000 and will remain in place for four months. The wall mural, which debuted at Vancouver City Centre station on Tuesday, drew curious looks from transit users, with many pulling out smartphones to snap a photo.” (Vancouver Province, August 28, 2013 )

Ironically, the man organizing the ad is Jewish. In the utterly ethnocentric view of the Jewish lobby groups, any criticism of Israel is an attack on Jews. Canadians must find their voice and insist we have the right to criticize ANY nation — Israel, Red China, North Korea, Iran, the USA, ANYONE.

Paul Fromm

Director

CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION]

[Editor’s Note: This is one front page story that caught me off guard. I never expected the Zionist media to give it such coverage but for some as yet unknown reason they’ve decided to do just that. It’s one helluva bonus for the Palestinians and for all their supporters worldwide who’ve been doing their utmost to draw the world’s attention to their plight over the past 66 years. Please pass this story to all you can.]

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=3274

‘Grave concern’ over transit ads

JEWISH GROUPS: Palestine poster campaign described as an attack on Israel, Jews

SAM COOPER – THE PROVINCE

Jewish groups in Vancouver say they are considering suing TransLink for accepting controversial political advertisements showing the “disappearance of Palestine due to Israeli occupation over the past 66 years.”

On Tuesday, a group called the Palestine Awareness Coalition announced the launch of 15 bus posters and a large mural in a central Vancouver SkyTrain station, that depict the territory of Palestine steadily shrinking into the state of Israel in a succession of dated maps.

Marty Roth – a 79-year-old member of the coalition group behind the ad – said they have already won a victory over groups that tried to “suppress” the ads.

“This will be controversial with a number of traditional Jewish organizations that have tried to suppress the ads,” Roth claimed. “But TransLink has refused to agree with them, because these are educational ads that are well within national advertising guidelines and the Canadian Charter (of Rights and Freedoms).”

Roth said, as a Canadian Jewish man, he believes Israel is unjustly oppressing the people of Palestine and his group wants to educate the Canadian public about the conflict.

But Jewish leaders including Mitchell Gropper, chair of the Jewish Federation of Greater Vancouver, called the ads a provocative attack on Jewish people that will incite hatred. “This is a grave concern to our community at large, because the ads make use of the buses unwelcome and unsafe,” Gropper said, noting that terrorist attacks in Israel often target buses.

“I don’t think I’ve ever seen ads on our TransLink system that attack a section of our society. If the transit system will be used to attack Israel and the Jewish people, who is next?”

The Province sought interviews with TransLink officials but were referred to a prepared statement, which says TransLink sought a “third-party legal opinion” with said the Supreme Court of Canada decided TransLink must run ads such as “Disappearing Palestine” under the Canadian Charter.

Gropper said his group has retained a lawyer with a different opinion, and that suing TransLink is one strategy that is being considered in a response to the ads.

“TransLink has said the law requires them to publish these ads but that is certainly not the case,” Gropper said.

The Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center in Toronto issued a statement saying the group is “disturbed to learn about TransLink’s agreement to run historically distorted anti-Israel advertisements.”

“While Israel and the Palestinian Authority are currently engaged in peace negotiations to resolve their differences and reach a two-state solution, TransLink will be running ads that are provocative and incite hatred and contempt,” said group president Avi Benlolo.

In 2006 TransLink lost a decision to the B.C. Court of Appeal, after trying to refuse political advertisements from the B.C. Teachers Federation of Students. TransLink’s policy of rejecting partisan ads and campaigns likely to cause offence or controversy was overturned.

In the decision, Madam Justice Prowse wrote that B.C. Transit and TransLink “sought to prohibit political advertising precisely because it was political. Their aim was to prevent the appellants from exercising their right to freedom of political expression, although they were content to entertain commercial expression.”

One woman, who declined to give her name, stopped to examine the ad. She said, while she wasn’t well-versed in the issue, she believes the ad should fall under the category of free speech.

Mohammed Hamid, 45, was one of the many transit users who stopped to snap a photo on his phone. Hamid is from the Middle East and is familiar with the various aspects of the issue being brought up by the ad.

He doesn’t believe the ad was malicious in anyway, but instead, was glad to see it drawing attention

PROTEST — WN Fired After SPLC Smear

Posted on August 29, 2013 by admin

PROTEST — WN Fired After SPLC Smear

After the following story came out my friend Craig Cobb was fired from his job. His employer even admitted that it was not for his behavior at work but his off work racial activism. Neo-Nazi Seeks To Turn Depressed North Dakota Town Into His Very Own Commune Of Racism And Hate Leith residents want white supremacist out; he says he is staying Please contact his former employer at the phone number and address below and ask him to give Craig his job back because Craig has every right to do racial activism outside of work. Thanks, April Gaede

Message from Craig Cobb Here is a test for nationwide White Nationalists. This is the owner of Border States Paving, Dan Thompson, who fired me. I’d appreciate it if you’d call and email him that I should be re-hired, because I am a Creator and was merely practicing the precepts of my religion . I am a Creator, not a “Neo-Nazi”. The lying SPLC knows this fact.
His number is PHONE (701) 237-4860 OR (800) 245-5965 Free . I am sure his voice mail box will fill up rapidly, so here are the emails. Fax (701) 237-0233 Border States Paving, Inc. :: Official Site 4101 32nd St N Fargo, ND 58102
If he thinks WN’s are nobodies, I will make direct appeals to all oil workers and truck drivers in the Bakken oil counties of Western ND and to the county purchasing agents who hand Mr. Thompson tens of millions of dollar contracts every year–that he is anti-worker rights. If enough oil workers and truck drivers call and email county purchasing agents and authorities and tell them that Border States Paving should not be receiving any road building contracts for 2014, this will have very real impact.

I ask all WN to call or email or petition and to get their friends. . I ask the help of the general public too, if you are or are not WN. Thank You.
Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success. Henry Ford

Ex-Klansman Threatens to Drive WN Pastor Out of Town

Posted on August 29, 2013 by admin

Ex-Klansman Threatens to Drive WN Pastor Out of Town

BATAVIA, AR. August 25, 2013. It was a surrealistic evening and conclusion to a four-night revival featuring a self-promoting ex-Ku Klux Klansman, who said he’d come to preach love and brotherhood but ended up urging his Pentecostal crowd of emotional elderly ladies to run the affable Pastor Tom Robb out of the nearby town of Harrison. The advertisements said “love”, but Johnny Lee Clary’s preaching was heavy with hate.

Johnny Lee Clary, with a soup bowl haircut and what looked like a 1970s leisure suit, entitled his talk to about 60 people, including six undercover policemen there to keep an eye on eight friends of the target of the night Harrison resident Pastor Tom Robb, announced his topic: One Man’s Love; One Man’s Hate.

Photo: Ex-Klansman Threatens to Drive WN Pastor Out of Town

BATAVIA, AR. August 25, 2013. It was a surrealistic evening and conclusion to a four-night revival featuring a self-promoting ex-Ku Klux Klansman, who said he'd come to preach love and brotherhood but ended up urging his Pentecostal crowd of emotional elderly ladies to run the affable Pastor Tom Robb out of the nearby town of Harrison. The advertisements said "love", but Johnny Lee Clary's preaching was heavy with hate.

Johnny Lee Clary, with a soup bowl haircut and what looked like a 1970s leisure suit, entitled his talk to about 60 people, including six undercover policemen there to keep an eye on eight friends of the target of the night Harrison resident Pastor Tom Robb, announced his topic: One Man's Love; One Man's Hate.

Clary, who is an associate of televangelist Jimmy Swaggart, told his audience at the Batavia Assembly of God that he had grown up as a racist and "hater" in California. His evidence was underwhelming. His father had called Negroes "niggers" and had warned him to lock up his bicycle when Negroes began moving in two blocks away. Later in his talk, he complained that about that time people in his area began to have to lock their doors.

Later, after his father's suicide, he was sent to other relatives inCalifornia. Lonely, he was befriended by his new family the Ku Klux Klan. He made such an impression that he was sent to Oklahoma.ll the while he was pursuing a career as a professional wrestler. He claimed he'd been the Kleagle or public relations officer, although the rank of Kleagle means legal advisor. Then, he alleged, he was elevated to Grand Dragon. His Klan life seemed to consist of yelling "nigger" at Negroes, leafleting, and doing numerous press interviews.

He'd made a special target of Rev. Wade Watts, a friendly Negro civil rights leader and preacher, who had bested him in a two hour media debate. He made threatening calls to Watts, lit a cross across the street from his house, broke a front window and left garbage on his lawn,initiated a failed attempt to burn his church down and, then, turned up with a carload of Klansmen to intimidate Watts and his family. According to him, when Watts pointed a shotgun at them, the Klansmen left streaks of rubber as they tore off down the street.

His life was "one man's hate."| He left the Klan in 1989, apparently, disillusioned by the growing strength of skinheads, disputes about stolen mailing lists, the discovery that his girlfriend was an FBI informant, accusations that he too was a police informant, and a "tip" that the FBI was going to plant drugs in his car and send him to jail for a long time.

His life fell apart. He embraced Jesus. He began to do well as a car salesman and then felt the calling to take his anti-racist show on the road.

He called up Rev.Wade Watts, the old victim of his bullying. Watts had always been friendly and forgiving and a man who refused to "hate". He gave Clary is first preaching gig at his all Negro Church. It was a media sensation. Watts and Clary then spent seven years travelling round America as a tag-team anti-hate preaching act. When Watts lay dying, Wade visited his "best friend" and kissed him.

Many women in the Batavia church congregation were weeping and swaying entirely beguiled by Clary's message of love.

However, for all the talk of love and forgiveness, Clary made repeated denunciations of long-time Harrison resident Pastor Tom Robb. Clary claimed that, in McAllister, OK, there were 30 Klansmen in a town of 30,000, but they were united did what they wanted. "I talk to the FBI," Clary confided, "for all the publicity Robb gets, he doesn't have more than 100 people at his meetings" , which, if true, would be twice the turnout at Clary's much advertised appearance. "The whole town, if they wanted, could make him go." It seems that Clary wants to do the Pastor Robb what he once tried to do to Wade Watts. Old habits seem to died hard.

Clary who has never met Pastor Robb, who heads up the Knights Party, assured the congregation that Pastor Robb's non-year old son or grandson -- if wasn't quite clear -- had been dressed up in a Nazi uniform. This is a complete lie, says Pastor Robb. So, said Clary, "these children should be taken from their parents for 'child abuse.' If you teach your children hate, it will kill them." This was a somewhat illogical prediction as Clary claimed to have been taught "hate" but still seemed very much alive working the congregation. He also asserted that a couple who had named their children Adolf Hitler and Eva and who had had their children taken away were followers of Pastor Robb. This was another invention.

After the meeting, Billy Roper, an associate of Pastor Rob's who had come to observe the meeting, was accosted by a corporal with the Boone County Criminal Investigation Branch and accused "of standing in an intimidating manner" looking at Clary's display of cds and "having an unpleasant look on his face." Having done his intimidation act, the corporal admitted that Roper was not under arrest.

Clary, who is an associate of televangelist Jimmy Swaggart, told his audience at the Batavia Assembly of God that he had grown up as a racist and “hater” in California. His evidence was underwhelming. His father had called Negroes “niggers” and had warned him to lock up his bicycle when Negroes began moving in two blocks away. Later in his talk, he complained that about that time people in his area began to have to lock their doors.

Later, after his father’s suicide, he was sent to other relatives inCalifornia. Lonely, he was befriended by his new family the Ku Klux Klan. He made such an impression that he was sent to Oklahoma.ll the while he was pursuing a career as a professional wrestler. He claimed he’d been the Kleagle or public relations officer, although the rank of Kleagle means legal advisor. Then, he alleged, he was elevated to Grand Dragon. His Klan life seemed to consist of yelling “nigger” at Negroes, leafleting, and doing numerous press interviews.

He’d made a special target of Rev. Wade Watts, a friendly Negro civil rights leader and preacher, who had bested him in a two hour media debate. He made threatening calls to Watts, lit a cross across the street from his house, broke a front window and left garbage on his lawn,initiated a failed attempt to burn his church down and, then, turned up with a carload of Klansmen to intimidate Watts and his family. According to him, when Watts pointed a shotgun at them, the Klansmen left streaks of rubber as they tore off down the street.

His life was “one man’s hate.”| He left the Klan in 1989, apparently, disillusioned by the growing strength of skinheads, disputes about stolen mailing lists, the discovery that his girlfriend was an FBI informant, accusations that he too was a police informant, and a “tip” that the FBI was going to plant drugs in his car and send him to jail for a long time.

His life fell apart. He embraced Jesus. He began to do well as a car salesman and then felt the calling to take his anti-racist show on the road.

He called up Rev.Wade Watts, the old victim of his bullying. Watts had always been friendly and forgiving and a man who refused to “hate”. He gave Clary is first preaching gig at his all Negro Church. It was a media sensation. Watts and Clary then spent seven years travelling round America as a tag-team anti-hate preaching act. When Watts lay dying, Wade visited his “best friend” and kissed him.

Many women in the Batavia church congregation were weeping and swaying entirely beguiled by Clary’s message of love.

However, for all the talk of love and forgiveness, Clary made repeated denunciations of long-time Harrison resident Pastor Tom Robb. Clary claimed that, in McAllister, OK, there were 30 Klansmen in a town of 30,000, but they were united did what they wanted. “I talk to the FBI,” Clary confided, “for all the publicity Robb gets, he doesn’t have more than 100 people at his meetings” , which, if true, would be twice the turnout at Clary’s much advertised appearance. “The whole town, if they wanted, could make him go.” It seems that Clary wants to do the Pastor Robb what he once tried to do to Wade Watts. Old habits seem to died hard.

Clary who has never met Pastor Robb, who heads up the Knights Party, assured the congregation that Pastor Robb’s non-year old son or grandson — if wasn’t quite clear — had been dressed up in a Nazi uniform. This is a complete lie, says Pastor Robb. So, said Clary, “these children should be taken from their parents for ‘child abuse.’ If you teach your children hate, it will kill them.” This was a somewhat illogical prediction as Clary claimed to have been taught “hate” but still seemed very much alive working the congregation. He also asserted that a couple who had named their children Adolf Hitler and Eva and who had had their children taken away were followers of Pastor Robb. This was another invention.

After the meeting, Billy Roper, an associate of Pastor Robb’s who had come to observe the meeting, was accosted by a corporal with the Boone County Criminal Investigation Branch and accused “of standing in an intimidating manner” looking at Clary’s display of cds and “having an unpleasant look on his face.” Having done his intimidation act, the corporal admitted that Roper was not under arrest.

STANDING UP FOR FREE SPEECH IN THE CRAIG COBB CASE

Posted on August 29, 2013 by admin

STANDING UP FOR FREE SPEECH IN THE CRAIG COBB CASE

CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION

P.O. Box 332,

Rexdale, ON.,

M9W 5L3

CANADA

Paul Fromm, B.A., B.Ed., M.A. Director

August 27, 2013

Dan Thompson,

Border States Paving,

4101 32nd St N.,

Fargo, ND 58102

Re: The Firing of Craig Cobb

Dear Mr. Thompson:

I am the director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression, Canada’s foremost free speech advocacy group. Your former employee Craig Cobb, a dual U.S. – Canadian citizen, was charged under Canada’s thought control laws, the so-called “hate law.” He was targeted for You Tube postings of his rightwing political and religious views.

Although Canada has an undeserved reputation for “human rights”, it throws dissidents in rison for the non-violent expression of their political views. You might wish to Google the names of such political prisoners as Brad Love, Terry Tremaine and Arthur Topham In some cases of political dissent the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled neither truth nor intent are defences.

In late 2010, Mr. Cobb wisely returned to the U.S. He is a hard worker.

I am writing to protest your decision to fire Craig Cobb from your company. Apparently, he was told it was not because of job performance. He was recently the subject of some overblown press reports. Your firing of Mr. Cobb violates his First Amendment rights to hold and express his political or religious views on his own time.

Your action is unfair and would seem to impose political correctness on your employees. I urge you, in the name of fairness, to re-instate him.

Sincerely yours,

Paul Fromm

PROTEST — WN Fired After SPLC Smear
After the following story came out my friend Craig Cobb was fired from his job. His employer even admitted that it was not for his behavior at work but his off work racial activism. Neo-Nazi Seeks To Turn Depressed North Dakota Town Into His Very Own Commune Of Racism And Hate Leith residents want white supremacist out; he says he is staying Please contact his former employer at the phone number and address below and ask him to give Craig his job back because Craig has every right to do racial activism outside of work. Thanks, April Gaede

Message from Craig Cobb Here is a test for nationwide White Nationalists. This is the owner of Border States Paving, Dan Thompson, who fired me. I’d appreciate it if you’d call and email him that I should be re-hired, because I am a Creator and was merely practicing the precepts of my religion as laid out by Ben Klassen, and doing it while off the job. There are dozens of positive and comparative mentions about NS, the Third Reich and Hitler in our holiest books. I am a Creator, not a “Neo-Nazi”. The lying SPLC knows this fact.
His number is PHONE (701) 237-4860 OR (800) 245-5965 Free . I am sure his voice mail box will fill up rapidly, so here are the emails. Fax (701) 237-0233 Border States Paving, Inc. :: Official Site 4101 32nd St N Fargo, ND 58102
If he thinks WN’s are nobodies, I will make direct appeals to all oil workers and truck drivers in the Bakken oil counties of Western ND and to the county purchasing agents who hand Mr. Thompson tens of millions of dollar contracts every year–that he is anti-worker rights. If enough oil workers and truck drivers call and email county purchasing agents and authorities and tell them that Border States Paving should not be receiving any road building contracts for 2014, this will have very real impact.
I ask all WN to call or email or petition and to get their friends. I ask the help of the general public too, if you are or are not WN. Thank You.
Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working together is success. Henry Ford

CAFE

Dedicated to Free Speech, Immigration Reform, and Restoring Political Sanity

Author Archives: admin

Nepean Redskins to Change Their Name After Rights Complaint Blackmail — Come On Hudak: Promise to Abolish the Ontario Human Rights Commission

Greetings from CAFE To Australian League of Rights New Times Dinner

Dave Lindsay Links Property Rights & Freedom of Speech

MEMO TO VLADIMIR PUTIN RE: G-20 MEETING

CAFE Accepted As Intervener in McCorkill Case

CAFE Seeks Intervener Status Today in McCorkill Will Case to Protect Private Property & to Defend Free Speech

Zionist Groups Seek to Suppress Pro-Palestinian Transit Ads in Vancouver

PROTEST — WN Fired After SPLC Smear

Ex-Klansman Threatens to Drive WN Pastor Out of Town

STANDING UP FOR FREE SPEECH IN THE CRAIG COBB CASE