Whatcott hit with another “human rights” complaint

Whatcott hit with another “human rights” complaint

Postby Bill Whatcott » Tue Jul 23, 2019 3:11 pm


Bill Whatcott’s Gospel preaching in front of the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (BCHRT) that Mr. Yaniv claims “caused immense injury to dignity and self respect.” So much so that Mr. Yaniv allegedly needs $35,000 in compensation to recover.

The flyer that allegedly harmed Mr. Yaniv so much he needs $35,000 and given the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (BCHRT) did not summarily dismiss his complaint (which is within their power to do), it appears they might agree with him!
viewtopic.php?f=16&t=10755

Jonathan Yaniv’s BCHRT complaint asking for $35,000 because I allegedly called him a man and criticized his vexatious habit for finding women working as estheticians out of their homes, demanding they wax his “female penis” and then slapping them with human rights complaints when they refuse.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1HXBWj … i5Fs_gHw_W

Jonathan Yaniv needs expedited service to fleece me of $35,000 because he is worried I am going to be in jail for 18 months before he gets his cash
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1WOZH4 … nNLhoEEE3B

Image
Here is the complainant whose “dignity, self respect and privacy” I allegedly harmed showing off in a bathing suit on social media.

Image
I note Mr. Oger (who the BC Human Rights Tribunal ordered me to pay $55,000 and no longer refer to using male pronouns) is supposed to be a woman and as Vice President of the BC NDP is allegedly deeply concerned about women’s rights and safety; however in this post on his own social media, Mr. Oger shows about as much sensitivity to the real female esthetician’s discomfort with being forced to handle Jonathan Yaniv’s ‘female penis” as you might expect from a porn addicted biological male.

Image
Just because Mr. Oger is comfortable looking at strange naked men when marching in homosexual pride parades, that doesn’t mean biological female estheticians are comfortable looking at strange men’s penises and being forced to touch them when the man identifies as a woman and demands a wax job in the woman’s private home. In fact real women have a valid concern for their safety if such a cross dressing man shows up and demands such an intimate service. Look at the article below and if you are a woman ask yourself if you would want to be alone with this guy.

Here is an article published by the Post Millenial delving into Mr. Yaniv’s background and exposing some of his disturbing, predatory tendencies. It should be a no brainer that women estheticians should not be forced to handle this strange man’s penis. I note most of the women who Mr. Yaniv targeted were working alone in their homes and some had children in their homes:
https://www.thepostmillennial.com/the-t … to-emerge/

Dear Friends,

Yesterday, I received this latest so-called “human rights” complaint. I’m not sure if this complaint is more outrageous than the last one. Really, these so-called human rights complaints are all an offense to real democratic principles and when it comes to complaints involving so-called transgender complainants the process is an offense to reality itself. What is clear to me is if these frivilous and vexatious complaints continue (and all indicators are the BCHRT is happy to spend taxpayer’s money entertaining them) the ability to use peaceful speech to challenge the mostly fraudulent claims of the LGBT agenda, especially as it pertains to so-called gender theory will be gutted. Now merely speaking on the street your reality grounded belief that biological men are men and proclaiming your belief publicly that men who call themselves women should not be able to target vulnerable biological women with demands that women be forced touch their private parts, such speech in Canada can land you in front of a human rights tribunal facing potentially tens of thousands of dollars in fines, not to mention spending tens of thousands of dollars defending yourself.

To be clear I will not be requesting any funds to defend myself in this latest case.

Before I deal with Yaniv’s complaint, I actually have to appear before the Ontario Superior Court to deal with funding for my criminal case, the so-called “hate crime” charge related to my Gospel ministry at the Toronto homosexual parade. I will be in the Ontario Superior Court, 361 University Ave, Toronto, this coming Thursday, July 25th at 9:30 am. Please pray that the judge orders funding for my case or else I will be self representing when the trial starts July 6th, 2020.

Of course throughout history Christians have had to appear before courts and tribunals without counsel. Christianity’s greatest missionary St. Paul had to appear before a Jewish Council where he was physically abused and had to defend himself without the help of a lawyer, see Acts 23. St. Paul also appeared before the courts of Caeser in Rome without the help of a lawyer and after giving his witness before the emperor, St. Paul was put to death. The injustice of St. Paul’s suffering and execution may have seemed meaningless at the time, but God used St. Paul both as a free man and as a prisoner and God used St. Paul both in life and in death, to spread the Gospel thoughout the Mediterranean region and his early ministry still touches people around the world today as they read his epistles and come to know Jesus Christ through his work.

No doubt Yaniv and the BCHRT would be really happy if I incurred the cost of another lawyer and expended all sorts of energy to defend myself against this frivilous and vexatious complaint. I believe we Christians have to do something different and indeed we have to work to reform our country and remove the ability of cultural Marxists and malcontents to use the power of the state to silence our speech.

Beyond pointing to Christ as our ultimate answer, I have no solution as to how to Canadians can regain our freedom. I think the judgements I am facing and the ordeal these 16 female estheticians have faced at the hands of a sick predator and a corrupt human rights tribunal is clear evidence our courts and political system is corrupt and I see no mass uprising on the horizon of outraged Canadians demanding to have their freedom back.

Once I deal with my hate crime charge on July 25th I might consider heading to BC to go into mediation with Mr Yaniv. I have no $35,000 to give him, but I have Good News that I can share and a treasure more long lasting and beneficial to his well being than money.

“The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me, because the Lord has anointed me to bring good news to the poor;
he has sent me to bind up the brokenhearted, to proclaim liberty to the captives, and the opening of the
prison to those who are bound.”
Isaiah 61:1

I also note Mr. Oger is hoping to run for office again in the fall federal election and not surprisingly the BC media is fawning over him in its coverage and all of the major outlets are pretending he is a woman: https://bc.ctvnews.ca/morgane-oger-look … -1.4493153

I had no plans to bring gender and Biblical truth to this upcoming election, however if I have to appear to speak to Jonathan Yaniv and deal with his allegations, it is altogether possible that God would want me to speak to gender non reality in the upcoming federal election while I am in Vancouver. To this end I might ask for some crowd funding in the near future and will greatly covet prayers in the meantime.

In Christ’s Service,
Bill Whatcott

Canadian Association for Free Expression

Box 332,

Rexdale, Ontario, M9W 5L3

Ph: 905-289-674-4455; FAX: 289-674-4820;

Website http://cafe.nfshost.com

Paul Fromm, B.Ed, M.A. Director

 

 

July 22, 2019

 

The Editor,

STONEY CREEK  NEWS,

 

Dear Sir:

 

Your editorial “What is the Greater Good?” (July 18, 2019) deals with the dilemma of what Council should do or can do to curb protests on public property.

 

Actually, there should be no dilemma. The right to protest or to present grievances to the monarch or ruler goes back to Magna Carta. As well, the Charter guarantees freedom of speech, freedom of association or assembly and freedom of religion. A variety of groups, some of whose views some citizens find offensive, have protested recently. That’s their absolute right. Council has busainess even to consider restrictions

 

Despite the views of some snowflakes, we enjoy no right not to be offended. Critics frequently denounce those they dislike with  terms  like” hate speech” and “hate groups” . These weaponized words are a lot of noise without substance. “Wilfully promoting hate” against certain groups is a criminal offence in Canada. It is narrowly construed. To my knowledge, none of the participants on various sides of these protests has ever been charged with or convicted of hate. The accusation of “hate” usually tells us more about the accuser’s emotions than the words criticized. “Hate speech”  means speech the accuser hates.

 

The city does have a legitimate role in ensuring that the protests are peaceful. Police should continue to observe these protests and, where rival factions show up, make certain that the two sides are kept apart — say on opposite sides of the street — so that both can exercize their right to wave their signs or flags and make their views known.

 

 

Council should go back to dealing with important issues like fixing our deplorable roads and leave free speech alone.

 

Sincerely yours,

 

Paul Fromm

Director

 

Twitter permanently silences Canadian free speech activist Lindsay Shepherd

Twitter permanently silences Canadian free speech activist Lindsay Shepherd

Update: A source has confirmed that the Twitter ban is permanent.


One of Canada’s most outspoken free speech advocates, Lindsay Shepherd, has been permanently suspended from Twitter. The suspension comes after a jousting match with a notorious trans woman named JY who has been accused of predatory behaviour toward children and making frivolous human rights complaints.

The Post Millennial reached out to Shepherd who said, “I got suspended for two tweets (although they didn’t tell me exactly which tweets were the problem so I am giving my best guess): last night, JY tweeted that I have a loose vagina from pushing a 10 pound baby out, but he still has a “tight pussy” (in reality, JY still has male genitalia according to the proceedings of the current human rights tribunals he’s been testifying in; and in reality I had a C-section and a 6 pound 10 oz baby).”

“I replied that this is something a man who has no functional romantic relationships with women would say, but that, I guess that describes him pretty well. Then, Yaniv mocked a reproductive abnormality I have (a septate uterus), and so I replied saying ‘at least I have a uterus, you fat ugly man.’ I thought, ‘I can’t allow him to make these misogynistic remarks about me and not fight back.’ I deleted the comments I made this morning but found out was suspended in the afternoon.”

Shepherd, who is also a columnist for The Post Millennial, told us that she is concerned about her inability to respond to mistruths now that she is banned from the platform. “Well, I am most concerned about the lies that can now be spread that I cannot counteract via Twitter. For instance, I saw an account tweeted that I have ‘sock puppet’ accounts. No, I do not have any accounts other than @NewWorldHominin. But I can’t correct that misinformation anymore.”

Shepherd first came to the public’s attention as a young teaching assistant at Wilfrid Laurier University. She stood up for free speech when her former professors subjected her to an extra-legal star chamber for the thought crime of showing a television clip featuring Dr. Jordan Peterson’s views on compelled speech.

Shepherd’s saga continued with a $3.6 million lawsuit against Laurier. The two professors who originally falsely accused and bullied Shepherd have launched a countersuit.

More recently, Shepherd testified in front of Parliament’s Justice Committee, claiming that, “Individuals who shouldn’t be caught up in online hate legislation will inevitably get caught up in it.”

Trans Activist Sues Brazilian Wax Business after Owner Refused to Shave Her Balls

Trans Activist Sues Brazilian Wax Business after Owner Refused to Shave Her Balls

Trans activist Jessica Yaniv is suing several business owners in a British Columbia after the salons refused to give her a Brazilian wax.

The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal is hearing her case this week.

At one point in the hearing Jessica Yaniv called the business owner to a neo-Nazi.

The owner told the court she was not comfortable “waxing male genitals.”

The hearing on Thursday devolved into outbursts and name-clling.
The National Post reported:

A B.C. Human Rights Tribunal hearing devolved into repeated outbursts and name-calling this week as it considered a transgender woman’s complaint that a home-based salon discriminated against her by denying her a Brazilian wax.

At one point, the complainant compared the business owner to a neo-Nazi. The lawyer for the business owner accused the complainant of engaging in “half-truths and fabrications.” Tribunal adjudicator Devyn Cousineau frequently had to interject to maintain decorum and to keep the hearing from careening off course.

But a substantive question remained at the core of the raucous daylong hearing: should a business be allowed to deny service on the basis of gender identity?…

…At Wednesday’s hearing, Yaniv, who is representing herself, said she came upon a Facebook ad in spring 2018 offering a promotion for a Brazilian wax, which involves the removal of pubic hair around the groin.

Da Silva testified she had just started her home-based business after previously performing waxes on family and friends. Yaniv was the first person to respond to her ad, she said.

They agreed over text message to an afternoon appointment. But Yaniv testified that after identifying herself as transgender and sending Da Silva a selfie, Da Silva cancelled the session.

Da Silva told the tribunal, “I have no problem with LGBT.” She said she was just not comfortable waxing male genitals. The idea also did not sit well with her husband, she said. Further, she didn’t have any experience doing it.

I bet Ms. Da Silva NEVER imagined her Brazilian wax business would put her in front of the Human Rights Tribunal!

Satiria@SatiriaNews

‘Jessica’ Yaniv’s Rules of Feminism!

1. All Trans Claims are True
2. Reality is Hate Speech
3. Wax My Balls

View image on Twitter
131 people are talking about this

Facebook Will Soon Be Banning Conservatives For Committing ‘Hate Silence’ – Your Thoughts Are Not Your Own

Facebook Will Soon Be Banning Conservatives For Committing ‘Hate Silence’ – Your Thoughts Are Not Your Own

(Tea Party 247) – Facebook is stepping up their censorship game. Natural News was just recently banned for content that was never even shared on the social media platform and that’s a scary occurrence. Just when we thought Big Tech was already the most powerful industry in America, they prove they have even more tricks up their fascist sleeves.

What Facebook is looking to create is an online echo chamber where everything posted, and not posted, is lockstep with the Leftist agenda including all things LGBT and baby murder.

As Ethan Huff points out in an article on Evil News,

Soon, if you don’t brand all of your profile photos with the over-layered, six-colored “rainbow” of LGBTQP during “Pride Month,” for instance, Facebook might decide to terminate your account for committing “hate silence.” This is the direction where things are headed as the Tech Cabal increasingly targets free-thinkers who break from the herd with suspension, shadow-banning, de-platforming, and even permanent bans for violating their ever-evolving litany of “community guidelines,” which always cater to Leftists at the expense of conservatives.

Now the truth is deemed hate speech and whether you post it or just quietly support it, you are likely to violate Facebook’s ever-changing “community guidelines,” as they are dictated by the ever-devolving Leftist agenda. Don’t be surprised when conservatives are soon being targeted for committing “hate silence” by simply holding different views than the loving, tolerant Left. Once Facebook sees that you are not publicly supporting Pride Month or the mutilation of pre-pubescent “trans” children you will be flagged and targeted.

This kind of censorship is absolutely insane and a direct violation of our First Amendment right. It’s also extremely hypocritical of the Left, which is something that has become par-for-the-course. Literally every idea, cause, or movement the Left pushes is somehow in contradiction with either itself or other Leftists ideas, causes, or movements.

Just look at how their victimhood hierarchy is constructed. At the very pinnacle of the caste system are “transgender” people, then women are somewhere towards the top but not higher than transgender. Now biological men are dominating women’s sports simply by claiming to actually be women. The “transgender” agenda is at odds with “women’s rights and equality.”

Now we have the Left yelling “fascist” at conservatives all while they blatantly censor us across all forms of social media. Now they want to control our thoughts and take away our right to have our own opinions and beliefs! This has to stop.

There is no way they don’t see how hypocritical they are which makes it even more disturbing. As Huff puts it, “This is what today’s Left expects, after all: absolute compliance with every single one of their “progressive” dictates, no matter how insane or ridiculous.”

If you even so much as dare believe that abortion is murder and that dismembering unborn babies is violent and evil and should be illegal, you are deemed a threat to the Left. If you post these obvious truths they will accuse you of “hate speech” and if you don’t post content that shows you support baby murder they will accuse you of “hate silence.” This is a scary direction we are going in.

Our only hope is that President Trump makes good on the allegations he has recently leveraged against Big Tech and follows through on his promises to end the censorship by Big Tech tyrants.

YOU TUBE CENSORS THE ETHNOSTATE COMMENTARY ON FLORIDA PRINCIPAL WHO QUESTIONED THE HOLOCAUST

YOU TUBE CENSORS THE ETHNOSTATE COMMENTARY ON FLORIDA PRINCIPAL WHO QUESTIONED THE HOLOCAUST

The new religion of holocaust is an amazing imposition of another group’s tribal history on the West. Western political elites who snear or scoff at Christianity behave like fanatics in their belief and insistence on imposing that belief on their people in the tribal history of another group. One can sneer at Christianity and face no consequences, indeed, even attract much approval. If you express disbelief in Irish tribal history — Cuculain, etc. — you won’t lose your job. However, express doubts about some accounts of what happened to Jews in WW II and unemployment, banning and ostracism quickly follow.

 

In the July 9 episode of THE ETHNOSTATE, commentators William Johnson, Paul Fromm and Kenn Gividen briefly discussed the story of a Negro Florida principal who told a parent who was demanding more Jewish tribal history of holocaust studies in the curriculum that not everyone believed in the Hollywood version of World War II. Specifically,  Principal William Latson told a parent, ‘I can’t say the Holocaust is a factual, historical event because I am not in a position to do so as a school district employee,’ adding that ‘not everyone believes the Holocaust happened.'” All hell broke loose. Despite the fact that the shell shocked principal went and spent several days of penance touring the Washington D.C. holocaust museum, he was reassigned.

 

Host producer Kenn Gividen opined that there should be no sacred cows and that all historical positions can be questioned or debated.

You Tube, enforcing the new religion of holocaust, swiftly deleted even this tiny whiff of heresy.

Twitter Sides With Tranny Potty Mouth & Bans Lindsay Shepherd

Twitter Sides With Tranny Potty Mouth & Bans Lindsay Shepherd

Supporters of free speech must DEMAND that these Silicon Valley near monopolies (Twitter, Facebook, You Tube, PayPal) be treated as public utilities and compelled to treat ALL customers without discrimination. Since special privileges for the transgendered and the sexually mixed up were rammed into law, CAFE, Jordan Peterson and others warned that there would soon be compelled speech. People would have to play in the delusional sandbox of those who looked like men but felt they were women or vice versa and echo their self identification. Thus, normal men and women would have to speak nonsense they did not believe or face legal consequences or, as in the case of the plain speaking Lindsay Shepherd, be banned from social media by the Silicon Valley censors who gladly impose the transgendered tyranny

Free speech activist Lindsay Shepherd on her Twitter ban: ‘Your instincts should not be to celebrate’

NOW Magazine Coverage of YOUR WARD NEWS SENTENCING

NOW Magazine Coverage of YOUR WARD NEWS SENTENCING
“It’s great to see YWN graphics make Now Magazine .” Dr. James Sears, NCP Leader
 
One of my favourites is down at the bottom of this page …
[As you can see from the zany cartoon, this isn’t “hate”, it’s spirited rollicking satire. Before Canada became so feminized and rotten with Minorityitis, we used to be able to laugh at each other and ourselves without needing a safe space or special mental trauma counsellors. — Paul Fromm]

Free Speech Haters Are Glum As Dr. James Sears Avoids Sentencing & Wins Right to Argue for a Mistrial in “Hate Law” Case

 

Free Speech Haters Are Glum As Dr. James Sears Avoids Sentencing & Wins Right to Argue for a Mistrial in “Hate Law” Case

Dr. James Sears, editor of the wickedly satirical NEW WARD NEWS, won the chance to argue for a mistrial in his “hate law” case. He has fired his lawyer and argued incompetent defence and sabotage. His passionate self-taught lawyering recalled the freedom fighting brilliance of the late Doug Christie. Submissions, including list of expert witnesses and “will says” are due July 29. Back in Court August 1. Free speech haters and many in the hyena pack media were glum faced that Dr. Sears was not led away in handcuffs. Especially prune faced were Warren Kinsella and the anti-free thought Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith.

Hear Bill Whatcott — The War to Silence Christian Dissent 

Hear Bill Whatcott — The War to Silence Christian Dissent 

The  Alternative Forum & the Canadian Association for Free Expression Proudly Present

Bill Whatcott

* The man the LGBTQ Lobby has sought to destroy

* Fined $55,000  by B.C. Human Rights Tribunal for criticizing flamboyant tranny NDP candidate Ronan Oger

* Victim of a class action suit for $104-million by Liberals and homosexual lawyers

*Now facing “hate” charges in Ontario

 

The War to Silence Christian Dissent: Oger & My Upcoming “Hate” Trial for Christian Witnessing

BILL WHATCOTT.jpg
Mr.Whatcott was threatened with a 104 million dollar lawsuit for giving out religious information at a Toronto gay pride parade. He had a Canada wide warrant out for his arrest for this. The B.C. Human Rights Commision fined him in the amount of I believe $55,000 for a misgendering that occurred in a provincial election in B.C. He still faces hate crime charges for the pride parade thing. Antifa communists violently repress political discussions and remain free to reoffend, but a guy like Bill who has a double dip of religious fervor and physically harms no one is in deep trouble. The lecture was sponsored by the Canadian Association for Free Expression and was facilitated by Paul Fromm.