Category Archives: Uncategorized
SUPPORT POURS IN FROM ACROSS ONTARIO FOR PAUL FROMM’S APPEARANCE AT HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL
SUPPORT POURS IN FROM ACROSS ONTARIO FOR PAUL FROMM’S APPEARANCE AT HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL
Letter to the Editor
Hamilton Spectator
To the Editor:
Your article advocating that the Canadian Association for Free Expression be denied the opportunity to submit a brief to Hamilton council is ironic, to say the least. In today’s editorial you stated: “Governments at all levels and of all stripes need to be very careful that they don’t abuse their positions of trust, including their commitment to be open, responsive and accessible to citizens. That’s central to their commitment to the democratic process and civic engagement”. If that isn’t doublespeak I don’t know what is. Let everyone’s opinion hit the table. Even Paul Fromm’s. If council or the public don’t agree with an opinion then argue it or ignore it. On the other hand, perhaps everyone’s point of view is essential to a robust dialogue on any issue at hand. What skin does the Spectator have in the game to deny a Canadian’s right to express themselves? Is it to control public opinion? Sounds like it.
Helen Kmera
Belleville ON
Former Hamilton Mayoralty Candidate Edward Graydon Comes to Paul Fromm’s Defence
Former Hamilton Mayoralty Candidate Edward Graydon Comes to Paul Fromm’s Defence
I think because of Fake News his reputation and what it is he really stands for is being taken out of context and because Google is really the only way people find out about other people he has been publicly outcasted for holding certain views but in reality I do not have that opinion of him I have never heard him utter hateful opinions and I talk to him regularly. Council believed what was being propagated against him and decided to believe much of the Fake News and decided not to let him speak and I think this was a big mistake.
UPDATED: White nationalist Paul Fromm denied permission to address council Fromm reacted by calling council closed-minded and undemocratic.
UPDATED: White nationalist Paul Fromm denied permission to address council Fromm reacted by calling council closed-minded and undemocratic

Hamilton city councillors have refused to hear from white nationalist Paul Fromm and a local yellow vester.
Councillors have refused to hear in person from white nationalist Paul Fromm and a local yellow vester who had asked to delegate at city hall.
The far right leader, who infamously ran unsuccessfully for mayor locally in the last election, had asked to speak to council about whether the city’s planned new hate prevention policy limits free speech. A new draft of the policy is expected to come out next month.
Via email, Fromm called council “closed-minded” and “undemocratic” for rejecting his request and criticized the “poisonous” Spectator for an editorial calling on councillors to deny him a speaking opportunity.
The news of his request spurred outrage and letters from citizens and groups like the Hamilton Centre for Civic Inclusion urging council to deny a platform to Fromm, arguing city hall is supposed to be a safe space for all residents.
Residents were quick to enumerate Fromm’s notorious past online, including his support for Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel and links to white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups past and present.
Councillors unanimously supported a motion from colleagues Sam Merulla and Chad Collins to deny the request.
There was no debate on the vote. But Merulla said afterwards he believes it is important to “not provide oxygen” to “radical” individuals who espouse a lack of tolerance toward marginalized groups.
Other councillors also specified ahead of time which way they would vote.
“As an elected representative of the people of Hamilton, it is my duty to uphold the integrity of Council Chambers,” tweeted Coun. Nrinder Nann ahead of the vote.
Her comments echoed those used by government members in Ottawa to deny Parliamentary press gallery entry to Fromm more than a decade ago “to preserve the dignity and integrity of the House.”
.
Councillors spent more time debating a request to speak at council from Lisa Thompson, a member of the controversial Yellow Vest group that often protests in front of city hall.
Coun. Lloyd Ferguson and Terry Whitehead argued council needs to ensure it has a good reason to deny citizens a chance to speak.
“We don’t need to accept what they say,” said Ferguson, who noted council previously agreed to hear a different group member.
Coun. Maureen Wilson, however, said council could reject the delegation request on procedural rather than ideological grounds. She argued Thompson’s desire to talk about the internal workings of the fractured local yellow vest group is “not germane” to council.
All council members but Ferguson eventually voted to deny Thompson’s request.
Coun. Judi Partridge was not present at the meeting.
Recent articles by Matthew Van Dongen
BLOW IT OUT YOUR EAR, BERNIE!
The Poisonous HAMILTON SPECTATOR Claims Freedom for Itself but Urges City Council to Prevent Paul Fromm Speaking as a Delegation
The Poisonous HAMILTON SPECTATOR Claims Freedom for Itself but Urges City Council to Prevent Paul Fromm Speaking as a Delegation
[The Hamilton Spectator is a far left fake news smear sheet So out to lunch is it that while it practises freedom of the press with impunity — in fact, for all the smear stories they’ve done on me in the past year, they have only once ever called me for an interview –.it wishes for Hamilton City Council to deny me the right to speak for five minutes as a delegation later this month. In Ontario, local councils and school board set aside time at the beginning of their meetings for “delegations”. Normally, a person or group with a concern registers to get on the list and is assigned five minutes to air their views. Back in August, I sought to apply to be heard as a delegation in order to air my concerns as Director of the Canadian Association for Freedom of Expression in light of Council’s instructions to staff in May to explore plans to prevent “hate groups” (the Yellow Vests and Christian pastors critical of the LGBTQ crowd) from holding protests on public property. This was actually being suggested for Hamilton, not Havana.
Here the Spectator says I should be silenced. The two Ottawa incidents to which they refer involved access to the Parliamentary Press Gallery. I had twice booked the Parliamentary Press Gallery for a half hour news conference. I have done this many times. On these two occasions, I was banned entry to the Parliament Buildings where the Press Gallery studio is located. Jason Kenney, the loyal Zionist waterboy was acting on a complaint by the pro-censorship group B’nai Brith. — Paul Fromm]
Editorial: When a white nationalist comes knocking …
Hamilton city council needs to take very seriously its deliberations about whether to allow infamous white nationalist Paul Fromm to delegate at an upcoming meeting.

Hamilton city council is under no obligation to allow Paul Fromm’s views a soapbox in a public meeting, held in a space owned and paid for by taxpayers. – Rene Johnston , Toronto Star file photo
Governments at all levels and of all stripes need to be very careful that they don’t abuse their positions of trust, including their commitment to be open, responsive and accessible to citizens. That’s central to their commitment to the democratic process and civic engagement.
That is why Hamilton city council needs to take very seriously its deliberations about whether to allow infamous white nationalist Paul Fromm to delegate at an upcoming meeting. Apparently, Fromm is worried about council’s proposed hate-prevention policies. Not surprisingly, he argues they limit free speech. “I don’t think it’s up to city council to play referee on various points of view,” Fromm said in an interview with The Spec’s Andrew Dreschel. “I was shocked I was hearing this in Hamilton, not Havana.”
Fromm knows very well there are already limitations on free speech. For example, your right to say what you want becomes illegal once you use it to make hateful comments about other people or groups. This, among other things, is what Fromm and groups he’s been involved with have done over a long career of far-right activism.
Fromm was a supporter of Ernst Zundel, who denied the Holocaust. Back in 2007, then-Conservative MP Jason Kenney successfully moved a motion to deny Parliamentary admission to Fromm and an associate “to preserve the dignity and integrity of the House.” The same thing happened in 2016 when Fromm tried to call a news conference in Parliament.
These setbacks didn’t deter Fromm. He ran for mayor in Mississauga when he lived there. He later moved to Hamilton and ran for mayor here in the 2018 municipal election. He has been an executive with white supremacist organizations. He has ties to former Ku Klux Klan members David Duke, Don Black and Mark Martin. The National Post described him as “one of Canada’s most notorious white supremacists.” In 2009 he participated in a White Pride march organized by the Aryan Guard, a neo-Nazi gang in Calgary.
Fromm is also, in his own estimation, a bit of an expert on semantics. All of these past activities don’t make him a racist or white supremacist. Rather, he argues, he is a white nationalist, committed to ensuring the “founding peoples” of Canada are not washed away by “waves of mass immigration.” (He’s not referring to founding Indigenous people, by the way. Only the white European ones.)
So, does any of this mean Fromm shouldn’t be welcome as a delegate to city council? The short answer is yes.
Odious as he and his views are, they are not illegal. He is free to hold them, and even to talk about them, provided he can do so in a manner that doesn’t promote hatred against identifiable people or groups.
But city council is under no obligation to allow those views a soapbox in a public meeting, held in a space owned and paid for by taxpayers. To do so would imply a degree, even if only a small one, of legitimacy to opinions based in bigotry.
Back in 2007, Kenney said this about his motion which successfully stopped Fromm from claiming Parliament as his podium: “If they want to get a soapbox and go out in front of the Parliament buildings in this free country, they’re welcome to do so, but this House isn’t going to let them use public, taxpayer-funded resources.”
Kenney was right 12 years ago and city council would be wise to make the same determination about Fromm’s delegation.
September 6 is Red Ensign Day — The Flag of the Real Canada
No Restrictions on Free Speech
Protesters Call for Criminal Charges Against CBC
Protesters Call for Criminal Charges Against CBC
|
WHATCOTT’S SEPTEMBER 2, 2019 UPDATE
Whatcott’s September 2, 2019 update

Bill handing out flyers in front of the BCHRT on the first day of his trial, December 11, 2018
Dear friends,
These past couple weeks have been quite busy.
The mediation date for Jonathan Yaniv’s British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (BCHRT) complaint against me has been set for:
October 16th, 2019, from 9:30 am – 4:30 pm
For those unaware, Mr. Yaniv is seeking $35,000 in damages for my flyer and preaching that referred to him as a man and criticized his predatory complaints against 16 female estheticians who he attempted to coerce into waxing his genitals.
Here is the preaching session that I am being prosecuted for
Strangely, the BCHRT has insisted the “mediation” be conducted via telephone conference.
“Given the high conflict nature of the complaint, the Tribunal has determined that the most appropriate method of mediation is by teleconference.”
Regards,
Danyka Wadley, Resolution Clerk
Mediation is generally done face to face with a mediator. If my mediation session with Mr. Yaniv is so “high conflict” that it is not safe for us to be in the same room together with a mediator then I am not actually sure what the purpose of the mediation is????
Anyways, tomorrow Monday, Citizen Go is holding a demonstration outside the Toronto CBC headquarters to voice our opposition to CBC’s “Drag kids” tv program.
In spite of concerns being expressed that the children depicted on the “Drag Kid’s” program are being exploited and the outrage expressed by many taxpayers at seeing gender confused young children in sexually suggestive poses on their tv screens, CBC in their usual fashion is ignoring the taxpayer complaints and imposing this harmful tv program on Canadians whether they want it or not.
Tomorrow I will be going to show my support for Citizen Go’s worthy protest. If you wish to go it will be held:
CBC Toronto headquarters, 250 Front St. W,
Monday, September 2nd, 12:30 to 2:00 PM.
On Thursday, September 5th, 2019 I will be back in the Ontario Superior Court again at 391 University St at 9:30 am for what is known as a Rowbatham hearing.
This is to see if I will qualify for government funding for my legal defense for my upcoming January 6th, 2020 so-called “hate crime” trial.
The Crown Prosecutor offered to support the application on my behalf for state funding so long as I would agree to pay $100 a month for perpetuity until the legal bill is paid in full and the $100 a month payable amount would be open to reassessment in the future at the Ontario government’s discretion.
Given that I didn’t ask for this trial and given that the debt that I would be agreeing to take on will likely run into the multiple tens of thousands of dollars whether I win or lose, and given that my earning capacity is less than that of the average Canadian, I told Mr. John Rosen (the lawyer who has been kind enough to work on this application on my behalf) that the terms are not acceptable. A life time of debt to the Ontario government whether I win or lose the criminal trial would definitely be a loss for me.
As for my other case with Mr. Morgane Oger, the NDP Vice President transvestite, who had me prosecuted by the BCHRT and fined $55,000 for telling Vancouver voters in a flyer that he is a biological male and that God did not want them to vote for him, there is no news yet on the appeal. However, the guy seems to still be bothered by my existence. Notwithstanding that I am not even residing in his province and I have issues more pressing than him in my life, Mr. Oger decided to publish malicious and delusional statements on his foundation website that I have threatened him with a rifle and that he needs continual police protection at his children’s school and his home, and warned those reading his website that I will likely kill someone if I am not dealt with.
Yup, that’s the guy who “Conservative” MP Michelle Rempel decided to fundraise for last year so that his foundation could be well funded to prosecute people who “misgender” him.
I note another “Conservative” MP had this to say about the “Morgane Oger Foundation” a foundation whose only purpose as far as I can see is to prosecute Canadians who dare to publicly disagree with Mr. Oger’s views on LGBT issues and now has delusional slander on its website:
“The role of the Morgane Oger Foundation is needed in Canadian society.”
Karen Vecchio, Conservative MP, Elgin, Middlesex, London
My advice if you really care about Conservative values and freedom of speech is don’t waste your vote on the so-called Conservative Party of Canada. The Christian Heritage Party or if you don’t have a CHP candidate in your riding than a People’s Party of Canada are the two parties truly committed to freedom of speech and the CHP is unambiguous in its commitment to protect the God ordained natural family from state intrusion.
In Christ’s Service
Bill Whatcott
“The earth, O Lord, is full of your steadfast love; teach me your statutes!”
Psalm 119:64









