Detained for “Wrong-Think”: Canadian Border Guards Seize Books from Monika Schaefer

Detained for “Wrong-Think”: Canadian Border Guards Seize Books from Monika Schaefer

Upon returning from the United States of America on 24 April 2019, I was detained by the Canadian Border Guards in the Calgary airport for three hours. 

Three Border Guards spent those hours perusing through my possessions, especially the books that I was carrying in my small suitcase. They were looking for “hate propaganda”. 

The five books which they seized from me for further inspection are the following:

  • Government by Deception  by Jan Lamprecht
  • Mystery Babylon: New World Unveiled Vol 1  by Eli James & Clay Douglas
  • The Great Inpersonation – The Mask of Edom  by Pastor Eli James
  • The Commission  by Richard Barrett
  • Bungled: “Denying the Holocaust”  by Germar Rudolf

Jan Lamprecht’s book was published in 2002 and has never had any complaints against it nor any bans on sales, whether in South Africa or America or any other place where it has been sold. Government by Deception is a critique of the black South African government, yet no black person, nor anybody else, has ever complained to the author. It was sold in several branches of the Exclusive Books chain in S. Africa, as well as through the online book distributor Amazon for a number of years. It was not taken down by any distributors.

The Commission I know very little about, it was given to me by acquaintances, and I was intending to do my own research by reading it.

Germar Rudolf’s Bungled: “Denying the Holocaust” is a book I had taken with me from home to read on the airplane. I had read 2/3 by the time of seizure. It is a scholarly analysis and critique of Debra Lipstadt’s book “Denying the Holocaust”, nothing more, nothing less. Rudolf points out statements made by Lipstadt and discusses her sources or lack thereof.

The two books by Pastor Eli James are about religion and religious views. Will the Bible be next on a “danger” list?

I happened to be carrying the Quran in my suitcase – it was given to me by a street preacher in Union Square New York City a few days earlier. I intended to check for myself some of the allegations about the Quran and learn first hand what all the fuss was about. This book they did not touch, though it clearly does have sections which incite hatred and preach violence. Many examples can be found online, and now that I have the physical book in hand, I can verify. Here is just one example:

5:33 Those that make war against God and His Messenger and spread disorder in the land shall be put to death or crucified or have their hands and feet cut off on alternate sides, or be banished from the country. They shall be disgraced in this world, and then severely punished in the Hereafter..

These Border Guards were looking for “hate propaganda”. Setting aside for the moment the meaninglessness of that term, how is it that single copies of books in my personal possession are deemed harmful or dangerous to anyone? What I choose to read is my business and no one else’s. It is not as though I were importing commercial quantities of books. We seem to have reached the stage where we are being dictated what to think, let alone what to say. This is Wrong-Think in George Orwell’s world of 1984

Contrast this harassment of those of us who question the “politically correct” version of history to the mainstream teaching about Karl Marx (birth-name Moses Mordecai Marx Levy). Considered to be the “father of Communism”, Karl Marx published the Communist Manifesto in 1848. I do not recall having learnt at school or university that Communism was an evil system which resulted in the murder of countless millions of people, nor did I learn that it was a Jewish endeavour. I recall having been left with a generally benign impression of Communism from my mainstream education. Would these Border Guards have passed over the Communist Manifesto, were it to be found in my suitcase?

Is there a list of forbidden books that has been issued by the Canadian Government? It is doubtful. These three guards were having a terribly difficult time determining whether my books met their “hate propaganda” threshold. They leafed through them over and over, hummed and hawed uselessly. They decided to send them to Ottawa for someone else to make the determination. I suggested to them that they would receive a good education by reading the books themselves. However I also informed them that I did not consent to their actions.

imagesThe authorities seem to be in a panic about Truth being revealed and the general Awakening that is coming. The fact that they are so afraid of a few books that Monika Schaefer carries in her suitcase, shows how far down the road of total tyranny we have gone. Communism seems to be upon us. In Bolshevik Russia people were shot for having the wrong books. Let us pray that our present trajectory change course quickly, or we could end up at that point in the not-too-distant future.

I could not have imagined this when I was growing up in a seemingly utopian world in which they told us we had total freedom of speech and freedom of the press in our perfect democracy. 

Whatcott has a trial date for so-called hate crime charge

Whatcott has a trial date for so-called hate crime charge

Postby Bill Whatcott » Fri Apr 26, 2019 11:13 pm

Image
Crack Christian Commandos disguised as “Gay Zombies” marching in the Toronto shame parade handing out redemptive Gospel literature with accurate information on the health hazards of homosexual sex practices and the dangers of perverted Liberal politicians.

Dear Friends,

The Judicial Pre-Trial is over and I now have a trial date for the so-called hate crime charge that I am facing for ministering the Gospel and accurate medical and sociological information to the Toronto homosexual shame parade while disguised as a “gay” zombie. (I also applied to march in the shame parade as an openly Christian man, but the parade organizers were discriminatory and did not welcome me.)

To read about the so-called hate crime I committed go here: https://thefederalist.com/2018/06/28/ca … sexuality/

The trial date has been set for January 6, 2020 and is scheduled to last four weeks in the Ontario Superior Court, 361 University St, Toronto, ON. The Crown has informed my lawyer Dan Santoro they will be seeking 18 months in jail.

Pray for God’s protection and provision to be over me and pray for freedom and truth to prevail.

In Christ’s Service
Bill Whatcott

For those who wish to help until the trial:
https://gogetfunding.com/help-bill-defe … nd-female/

“For the Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost.” Luke 19:10 :cross:

Canada’s Border Thought Police Seize (Steal) Books From Former Political Prisoner Monika Schaefer

Canada’s Border Thought Police Seize (Steal) Books From Former Political Prisoner Monika Schaefer

 

Just a heads up. On returning to Canada Monika Schaefer was detained by Canada Border Services (the border thought police) in Calgary for three hours. They seized five of her books including  Government by Deception. They said the books would be examined for hate speech. [No, she didn’t land in North Korea, she landed in Canada. You know, with Trudeau’s lying Charter of Minority Rights & Lack of Freedoms.]

She had a Koran on her I think but they did not touch that, despite its obvious and open hate.

Canada is scary indeed.

The Crown Wants a Year in the Gulag for Satire — Dr. Sears Sentencing, Toronto, Friday, April 26

 

The Crown Wants a Year in the Gulag for Satire — Dr. Sears Sentencing, Toronto, Friday, April 26

 

 

The Crown is asking for a year in prison for an Aboriginal publisher of YOUR WARD NEWS Leroy St. Germaine and Dr. James Sears, Canada’s most gifted satirist. Provincial Court (College & Yonge), Friday, April 26, Good Friday in the Greek Orthodox calendar. Will Dr. Sears get crucified? There’ll be international observers watching Canada;s Cultural Marxist courts in action.

No photo description available.

Le camarade Boris Le Lay censuré sur (((Facebook)))

Articles d’actualité Articles en exergue France Médias, manipulations et censures Problèmes raciaux Résistance Aryenne

Le camarade Boris Le Lay censuré sur (((Facebook)))

(((Facebook))) fait le grand ménage, nous étions au courant depuis l’attaque de notre frère Brenton Tarrant. 

Il est donc normal, que dans leur logique de censure des Blancs, de voir que de nombreux camarades soient supprimés de ce réseau.

20 Minutes :

Facebook vient d’annoncer ce samedi que le compte du blogueur ultranationnaliste breton Boris Le Lay, condamné à plusieurs reprises pour racisme, a été supprimé. Il a été condamné à plusieurs reprises à des peines de prison ferme pour incitation à la haine raciale, apologie de crime contre l’humanité ou contestation de crime contre l’humanité. Un mandat d’arrêt avait été lancé contre lui, mais il réside à l’étranger, vraisemblablement au Japon, un pays avec lequel la France n’a pas de convention d’extradition.

Une suppression qui n’est que la suite de la guerre contre les pro-Blancs, dans l’espace virtuel désormais. (((Facebook))) est la cible des critiques qui trouvent que les nationalistes Blancs avaient trop d’influence, ils ferment donc tout ce qui est trop influent.

Toutefois, tous ceux qui sont passé par le réseau social en question sont parfaitement au courant que Zuckerberg n’a pas attendu les critiques pour censurer tout ce qui était un peu trop à droite.

Cependant, il faut laisser le moins de place possible à une parole dissidente, anti-système, donc toute personne se revendiquant Blanche et nationaliste sera interdit.

La liberté d’expression à son apogée.

Régulièrement critiqué pour la gestion de ses contenus, Facebook a multiplié les mesures en vue de faire le ménage au sein de son réseau.

« Les individus et organisations qui propagent la haine, attaquent ou appellent à l’exclusion des autres sur la base de ce qu’ils sont, n’ont pas leur place sur nos services », a indiqué un porte-parole du géant américain à l’AFP. Facebook avait notamment annoncé jeudi avoir exclu de ses pages et de sa filiale Instagram plusieurs groupes britanniques d’extrême-droite.

Boris Le Lay ne propageait pas la haine sur son compte, seulement des liens qui montraient la haine des envahisseurs envers les autochtones, nous les Blancs.

« Appellent à l’exclusion des autres sur la base de ce qu’ils sont… » Donc si vous appelez à exclure de la société un tueur d’enfants vous n’avez pas votre place sur (((Facebook))) au contraire du tueur, qui ferait partie d’une communauté minoritaire ?

Un exemple extrême qui représente bien la stupidité des règles du réseau du youtre Zuckerberg.

Le seul but n’est pas de lutter contre la haine mais lutter contre les Blancs.

Heureusement pour notre camarade Boris, il dispose d’une page VK, d’un compte Twitter et de Breiz Atao

Citons d’ailleurs le message de Boris Le Lay à propos de sa censure :

Si vous arrivez sur cette page, c’est que vous avez su, par un biais ou un autre, que mes pages Facebook ont été censurées par le gouvernement français. C’est désormais la méthode standard de celui-ci et des groupes communautaires qui le contrôlent, pour faire taire toute forme d’opposition.

Ce n’est pas une mauvaise chose en soi : Facebook est en nette perte de vitesse même s’il reste un gros réseau social. La censure systématique, qui va encore s’aggraver bientôt avec une nouvelle loi de censure voulue par E. Macron, le rendra impraticable. Les gens vont laisser ce truc centralisé et ultra politisé disparaître.

VK offre de nouvelles garanties en raison de sa situation en Russie. Il est beaucoup moins connu mais tel était le cas de nombreux réseaux sociaux avant lui. Inscrivez-vous dessus et surtout encouragez vivement les gens à quitter Facebook.

Attention néanmoins à ne pas sous estimer la censure des autorités en Russie, cela reste un réseau public qui est soumis à un contrôle – certes moins stricte mais présent quand même. Nos ennemis auront beau nous censurer, grâce à Internet personne ne pourra nous empêcher de nous exprimer et de diffuser nos idées.

Plus ils feront des efforts pour nous faire disparaître, plus nous serons agressifs.

PayPal Blacklists United Constitutional Patriots After They Helped Catch Illegal Aliens Invading U.S.

PayPal Blacklists United Constitutional Patriots After They Helped Catch Illegal Aliens Invading U.S.

 

 

The United Constitutional Patriots, who made headlines on Thursday for helping catch hundreds of illegal aliens invading America through our southern border, announced Friday on Facebook they were banned by PayPal and all their funds have been frozen for 180 days.

The United Constitutional Patriots said they wanted to thank everyone who donated to their “Border Ops mission” but they “can no longer accept payments” through PayPal as “they have permanently suspended our account.”

They said PayPal is holding $1,300 in donations “for 180 days.”

Chris Menahan
InformationLiberation
Apr. 20, 2019

Share Facebook Twitter Reddit


 

Fighting for Information & Transparency in Prosecution of Christians by BC Human Rights Tribunal

Kelly Ainsley

and to : those who care about good governance in British Columbia

your email to me, above, is not good enough.

Her Majesty the Queen in right of British Columbia does business, everywhere in the province, at all times.

apparently  … just dealing with my simple request for information about due process within a judicial ?   proceeding triggered a case of the heebie-jeebies … so bad that  Mr Adamson bailed-out of his  safe space there at the Seat of All Wisdom, ie.  the BCHRC HQ.   Back in my day, civil servants were made of sterner stuff.

if one of the Queen’s bureaucrats cannot take the stress of blowback from the non-sense for which he’s the flak-catcher,  he does not have the luxury of taking a time-out while the scandal dissipates.    The BC Human Rights Commission would like us to believe it’s  a Person. Thus : the Commission is obliged to co-operate with me in its functioning … not just put out ‘gone fishin’ sign. Text Mr Adamson at his hideout  that :   I’m just getting warmed up.

we have in hand a transcript of the seminar given by psychiatrist W Wong, boasting that he has “over 500 patients going through transition, all in care of the Ministry’ .  Meaning : Wong and his  pals are running a   racket in which they manipulate children to align demselves with the sexual perversions of the Apotemnophilia cult, then bill  provincial accounts for concomittant services / drugs / etcetera.  Point being : many many children are being mutilated by a bunch of quacks. BC taxpayers are being bilked out of funds by monsters – Wong and the rest, especially the proponents of the SOGI propaganda – as they ruin lives with “experimental medicine” .  I remind all concerned that war criminal Joseph Mengele was involved in much the same kind of “research’.  The excuse used by Wong et al. is not any different in principle than what the ghouls who run Red China do there … = harvest organs from living human beings.    What went on in the show-trial of Oger vs Whatcott, and now the Commission’s refusal to provide a transcript of it,  exemplify  how tyrants resort to censorship when they’re being exposed.

Gordon S Watson

 

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:30 PM Kelly, Ainsley AG:EX <Ainsley.Kelly@gov.bc.ca> wrote:

Dear Gordon,

 

Thank you for your email. I am writing to advise you that the Tribunal Registrar Steven Adamson is away from the office until April 29, 2019 and will respond to your inquiry after his return.

 

 

From: Gordon S Watson <watson.gordons@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 1:19 PM
To: BC Human Rights Tribunal AG:EX <BCHumanRightsTribunal@gov.bc.ca>
Cc: watson.gordons <watson.gordons@gmail.com>
Subject: Publicity is the soul of Justice

 

Steven Adamson, Registrar

BC Human Rights Commission

 

following below is a 2-page letter which I faxed at 12:45 pm today to the HR Commission

please acknowledge receipt of my fax.
And also, acknowledge that you’re aware I have requested the Transcripts described.
If this letter does not suffice as a proper request, then I need to know what the BC Human Rights Commission wants, in order for me and others, to get the Transcript of the Oger Whatcott hearing

Gordon S Watson
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

April 18th 2019
British Columbia Human Rights Commission

Attention : Steven Adamson, Registrar

This is the first page of 2 pages, total, faxed to 604 775 2020

Re : Oger versus Whatcott your file # 16408

1. When the first session of the Tribunal in this matter convened I was in the audience. 
My notes show that Chairwoman Juricivic stated 
‘this matter is being recorded. A transcript may be available if a person requests it stating his reasons’.
2. at paragraph 14 of the Reasons for the ruling in this matter, Devyn Cousineau folded-in a paraphrase of what Bill Whatcott had said while testifying. Apparently, a transcript has been made of – at the very least – his testimony. Unless told otherwise by you, I’m going to assume that the testimony of Ronan/ Morgane Oger has also been transcribed.

3. I wish to have a copy of the transcript of what witnesses Oger and Whatcott testified before the Tribunal. Please advise me of the cost of each item and how to go about getting them?
My Reasons for having a copy of the Transcripts are :

4. I stood as a candidate to be a member of the Legislature in the general election of 2001. 
I intend to do so in the next provincial election. An essential part of my platform will be ; informing electors and taxpayers as to the implications of what went on in the Oger Whatcott Tribunal. It is of utmost importance for Canadians to appreciate how the ruling in this matter effectively outlaws the preaching of the Gospel of the Kingdom of Heaven, as proclaimed by Jesus Christ and the prophets of Israel. The submission by Dr Lugosi on behalf of Bill Whatcott responding to the Attorney General’s position in this case, sums-up what’s at stake : liberty to participate in democracy during an election, at all. I require the transcripts of the witnesses in order to make them available to the public : this matter is a perfect example of the maxim “Publicity is the soul of Justice” The written record of what was said is crucial for them to make up their own minds about the fitness for office of candidates of the New Democratic Party … for deciding who to vote for, or not vote for.

5. The Bible tells us that “by two or three witnesses a thing is confirmed”. I was not in the room when Complainant Oger gave his testimony. But two of my friends were. They each told me that he related an incident which – ostensibly – demonstrated why the Whatcott flyer was “hate speech” i. e. because a man was so moved by it that he attempted to assault NDP candidate Oger. Ronan / Morgane Oger is a classic example of the fragile homosexual. His type will do and say anything for attention. Had such a thing really happened then he – masterful at using social media – would have maximized it in cyberspace for purposes of his campaign. The lack of any report in the public record, of anything like unto what he pretended, speaks volumes.

6. The Commission is no doubt aware that I have a complaint underway to the Attorney General as to Devyn Cousineau’s fitness to sit on that Tribunal. Cousineau is a longtime partisan political activist on the issue which is the centrepiece of the Oger Whatcott matter. There is hard evidence of her contributing funds to a group which advocates for still more special treatment for the ?L?G?B?T?Q?/whatever? people. It doesn’t take a degree in law or political science, to realize that Devyn Cousineau was biased in the very first instance. It is outrageous that the thing went ahead with her on the panel
7. The notion that Oger ‘was about to be attacked and was only saved by intervention of a police officer’, is a classic example of emotional blackmail / playing on the sympathy of the public conscience – one of the favourite tactics of the Marxists. Had such an incident taken place, Devyn Cousineau would certainly have known about it : she would have used it as part of her Reasons. The fact that she didn’t, tells us that ‘it never happened’.

8. I am unlearned in the law. Nevertheless, I am one of Canada’s most experienced laymen in the laying of private Informations. I have good reason to believe and I verily do believe that, while testifying under Oath, Ronan Oger aka Morgane Oger committed Perjury. I require the transcripts as evidence for substantiating charges against him of Perjury and obstruct/ pervert Justice.

9. The Commission will be aware that at the Supreme Court of British Columbia Lawcourts at 800 Smithe Street Vancouver, anyone may arrange to listen to the recording of a proceeding, for free. As well, a party to it may obtain a copy of the entire proceeding of his or her case, on CD …. called ‘the DARS disc’. Someone asking for it, must apply to a Justice, and swear an Affidavit that such a disc will be used ONLY for purposes of refreshing their memory. But not for publication. Then, if the Order is granted, they pay a fee of $25

10 Please advise me if Bill Whatcott or his lawyer may obtain a copy of the DARS disc of the entire hearing before the Tribunal of file 16408 ?. I need that information in order for me to subpoena them to the Process Hearing when I lay the private information against Oger.

Gordon S Watson

Justice Critic, Party of Citizens Who Have Decided To Think for Ourselves & Be Our Own Politicians

Angry students want outspoken liberal prof Camille Paglia replaced with ‘queer person of color’ over her #MeToo, transgender criticisms

Angry students want outspoken liberal prof Camille Paglia replaced with ‘queer person of color’ over her #MeToo, transgender criticisms

In this age of adults charged with running college campuses actually bowing in terror to every woke demand of leftist students, it was only a matter of time before the youngins at University of the Arts in Philadelphia would go after Camille Paglia, a world-renowned, outspoken feminist and professor at the school.
Paglia, you see, is a longtime liberal. But she’s often voiced views that liberals — particularly of the far-left persuasion — don’t like.
When Hillary Clinton was running for president, Paglia wrote that Clinton’s “blame-men-first-feminism” wasn’t doing her campaign any favors. Soon after that Paglia pointedly asked, “What is it with the Hillary cult?” And after Clinton lost the election to President Donald Trump, Paglia ripped the Democratic nominee, saying misogyny didn’t lose her the election.

Why are students angry at Paglia?

Which brings us to the verbal dust-up at the University of the Arts. Students there launched a recent petition saying Paglia “blatantly mocked survivors of sexual assault and the #MeToo movement, and in classes and interviews has mocked and degraded transgender individuals.” For that they’re demanding the school oust Paglia and replace her with a “queer person of color.”
Paglia, inconveniently, is a lesbian. Not that it’s won her many lesbian fans, mind you: “My problem is that I do not get along with lesbians at all,” she told the Independent several years ago. “They don’t like me, and I don’t like them.” But Paglia indeed is not a person of color, and that just won’t do with this cadre of leftist youths.
In regard to their issue with Paglia not genuflecting before the #MeToo altar, the students’ petition points to the following clip in which Paglia excoriates bad female behavior amid a “bourgeois culture of excuses”:

Inside Higher Ed said Paglia’s comments about transgenders in a 2017 interview likely ruffled left-leaning feathers.
“It is certainly ironic how liberals who posture as defenders of science when it comes to global warming (a sentimental myth unsupported by evidence) flee all reference to biology when it comes to gender,” she noted to the Weekly Standard. “Biology has been programmatically excluded from women’s studies and gender studies programs for almost 50 years now. Thus very few current gender studies professors and theorists, here and abroad, are intellectually or scientifically prepared to teach their subjects. The cold biological truth is that sex changes are impossible. Every single cell of the human body remains coded with one’s birth gender for life. Intersex ambiguities can occur, but they are developmental anomalies that represent a tiny proportion of all human births.”

What does the school have to say?

Sadly it appears the University of the Arts students won’t be getting Paglia ousted anytime soon, as their petition also takes a shot at school president David Yager, saying he should apologize “for his wildly ignorant and hypocritical letter.”
Inside Higher Ed said Yager’s letter — which doesn’t mention Paglia by name — was distributed as students began urging her dismissal:

Unfortunately, as a society we are living in a time of sharp divisions—of opinions, perspectives and beliefs—and that has led to decreased civility, increased anger and a “new normal” of offense given and taken. Across our nation it is all too common that opinions expressed that differ from another’s—especially those that are controversial—can spark passion and even outrage, often resulting in calls to suppress that speech.

That simply cannot be allowed to happen. I firmly believe that limiting the range of voices in society erodes our democracy. Universities, moreover, are at the heart of the revolutionary notion of free expression: promoting the free exchange of ideas is part of the core reason for their existence. That open interchange of opinions and beliefs includes all members of the UArts community: faculty, students and staff, in and out of the classroom. We are dedicated to fostering a climate conducive to respectful intellectual debate that empowers and equips our students to meet the challenges they will face in their futures.

I believe this resolve holds even greater importance at an art school. Artists over the centuries have suffered censorship, and even persecution, for the expression of their beliefs through their work. My answer is simple: not now, not at UArts.

The University of the Arts is committed to the exercise of free speech and academic freedom, to addressing difficult or controversial issues and ideas through civil discussion, with respect for those who hold opinions different from our own. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis’ 1927 advice still holds true today: that the remedy for messages we disagree with or dislike is more speech and not enforced silence.

How is Paglia reacting to all of this?

Paglia told Inside Higher Ed that she considered protests against her “a publicity stunt” by those who don’t understand her ideas — and she praised Yager’s “eloquent statement affirming academic freedom [as] a landmark in contemporary education” and hoped other schools will see it as a model for how to “deal with their rampant problem of compulsory ideological conformity.”

Facebook bans British anti-immigrant groups including EDL, BNP and Britain First: Anti-White Purge Continues

 

[Facebook continues its anti-White purge. Nationalists are being deplatformed at an insane rate. People who support free speech must insist that social media near monopolies like Facebook, You Tube, PayPal, etc. be treated as public utilities and COMPELLED to serve all people not directly engaged in proven criminal activities. The latest Zuckerberg rampage in political censorship pure and simple. Communists of all sort, who have over 100-million corpses on their record, are, of course still welcome on this minority tyrant’s site.]

Facebook bans British anti-immigrant groups including EDL, BNP and Britain First
Facebook has banned 12 high-profile, anti-immigrant British organizations and individuals including the English Defence League, the British National Party, Britain First and Jayda Fransen.

The silicon valley company said it took the decision because it bans users who “proclaim a violent or hateful mission or are engaged in acts of hate or violence.”

“Individuals and organisations who spread hate, or attack or call for the exclusion of others on the basis of who they are, have no place on Facebook,” it said in a statement.

The following organizations and people are now prohibited from the site: The British National Party and Nick Griffin, Britain First and Paul Golding and Jayda Fransen, English Defence League and Paul Ray, Knights Templar International and Jim Dowson, National Front and Tony Martin, and Jack Renshaw.

ALSO ON RT.COMTommy Robinson banned from Facebook, Instagram over ‘hate speech’They were all outlawed under Facebook’s ‘Dangerous Individuals & Organisations policy’. They will no longer be allowed a presence on Facebook or Instagram and posts and other content which expresses praise or support for them will also be banned.

“Our work against organised hate is ongoing and we will continue to review individuals, organisations, pages, groups and content against our Community Standards,” the statement added.

The Knights Templar International said it was “horrified” by the ban, and that it was investigating legal options. “Facebook has deemed our Christian organisation as dangerous and de-platformed us despite never being charged, let alone found guilty of any crime whatsoever,” it said in a statement. “This is a development that would have made the Soviets blush.”

In February the social media giant banned EDL founder Tommy Robinson from its platforms saying the prominent anti-immigration activist repeatedly breached its policies on Hate speech.

Pinterest Bans ALIPAC With False Claims of Racism

 

 

[More techno giant social media censorship of immigration reform groups.]

For National Release | April 19, 2019


Please support our struggle against Silicon Valley censorship and attacks on civil rights by sharing this message by email and on (ALIPAC HERE) .. (FACEBOOK HERE) .. (TWITTER HERE) .. (GAB HERE)

(Raleigh, NC) After taking down ALIPAC’s folder titled “ALIPAC” last week, which contained memes opposing Amnesty bill S 874, Pinterest applied a full ban of Americans for Legal Immigration PAC’s account today after sending an email claiming:

“We have suspended your Pinterest account after finding multiple violations of our policies on hate speech, we suspended your Pinterest account. You will no longer be able to access your Pins or messages.
We don’t allow content that attacks people based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, age, disability or medical condition.
Thanks for understanding,
The Pinterest Team”

There were no memes or images that attacked any people based on race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, gender, etc. in ALIPAC’s Pinterest account.ALIPAC is a racially inclusive national organization with strict rules against racism, where many of the group’s top volunteers and donors are black and Hispanic.

All memes and images contained in ALIPAC’s now banned Pinterest account were posted (AND CAN BE REVIEWED) on ALIPAC’s Facebook account (View Here) and Twitter Account (View Here). Both Facebook and Twitter have very strict rules against racist and hateful content and have not banned or removed any of ALIPAC’s Pinterest hosted memes except for one about Molly Tibbetts, which Facebook apologized for removing and claimed to restore. (Review Washington Times Article)

“We have dispatched a certified letter to Pinterest CEO Ben Silbermann asking him to correct this wrongful censorship and deceptive claims by Pinterest employees and restore our Pinterest folders and account,” said William Gheen, President of ALIPAC. “It is clear that someone at Pinterest disagrees with our politics and is using fake claims of racism and hate to censor us, influence the outcome of legislation and elections, and violate our civil rights!”

ALIPAC has been fighting a national battle against Silicon Valley corporation censorship, which violates the civil rights of American citizens and maintains a list of more than 94 conservative activists and groups being targeted by Facebook, Twittter, PayPal, Google, and now Pinterest. (View List)

Last year, ALIPAC’s 12 page report to Congress on Silicon Valley censorship (View) was entered into the Congressional Record by Iowa Congressman Steve King.

All of the memes ALIPAC uploaded to Pinterest are still visible in ALIPAC’s Announcements and Alerts section (View Here) going back more than 5 years.

Here are the latest memes ALIPAC uploaded to Pinterest since the ALIPAC folder was censored last week.

DO YOU FIND THESE MEMES TO BE RACIST OR HATEFUL?