LADY MICHELLE RENOUF’S SPEECH TO “DON’T BAN THE NPD RALLY” IN LONDON, FEB. 27
27th February 2016 – RENOUF speech delivered and recorded opposite the German Embassy in London, in defence of the non-banning of the NPD Party.
German Embassy diplomats, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN here today and viewing on the worldwide internet,
The question of the day is: WHY IN THE WORLD DOES GERMANY NEED THE N.P.D.?
I keenly answer, by echoing the NPD’s 3 REASONS, in their own words:
1) DEMOCRACY REQUIRES RIGHT TO BE OFFERED A REAL POLITICAL CHOICE.
2) RIGHT OF NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY.
3) RIGHT TO A NATIONAL RACIAL IDENTITY AND CONSEQUENT AUTHENTIC CULTURE – because RACE AND NATIONAL CULTURES sustain the DIVERSE NATIVE BEAUTY OF OUR PLANET.
Briefly an outline:
1) DEMOCRACY … as we understand it, is meant to offer citizens political choices.
The existence of the NPD duly alerts Germans ( and likewise other European countries ) that none uphold democracy while ever nationalist parties are media-sidelined, suffer mendacious reportage without a just re-dress; are criminally infiltrated in order to entrap, sabotage and misrepresent their policies ; and remain under threat of being banned.
To quote from the NPD’s website:
“An open political process and a legally protected process of political opinion-forming (the indispensable foundation of a free democratic order) is threatened by the impending monopolisation of politics, due to the lust for power of well-organised interest groups.
“This is already well under way, though covered up or glossed over by politically biased coverage in the public media of the mass immigration and consequent conflict in Germany – in a ubiquitous process of undermining parliamentary democracy, with Chancellor Merkel transforming Germany into a multiethnic state through the lowering of German borders without even a Cabinet decision, let alone a vote in Parliament. In fact it is not the policy of Merkel’s critics that is “extremist”, but government policy itself that is “extremist”. “
2). The NPD works to alert the German people ( and likewise other nations ) that they have no SOVEREIGNTY under the European Union.
To quote from the NPD website:
“In several places in Germany’s constitution – the “Basic Law” – there is mention of the concept of the German people. The very legitimacy of state power derives from this concept of a German people, with an inherent German ethnicity.
Even a former Constitutional Court judge Udo di Fabio recently pointed out that the government could not go ahead and create a new German people via unlimited immigration, as in that case state power would no longer derive legitimacy from the bottom up – government would be taking on itself the right to alter the size and composition of the nation state, in what a well-known constitutional lawyer Josef Isensee in 1999 (addressing the issue of dual citizenship) called a “constitutional coup from above”).“ – an unidentified “above” governance, at that!
3). NATIONAL IDENTITY:
A country denied its sovereignty is also thereby denied its national right to its racial identity. To quote from the NPD website, in a letter to German police and armed forces from NPD party chairman Frank Franz ( Herr Franz, an able and respectable spokesman, with whom I have had the pleasure of meeting and discussing these issues firsthand), said:
“The police and armed forces fulfil an essential task of great importance in today’s society. Their tasks face drastic transformation in the foreseeable future. A new development is potentially shattering the stability of our community: namely the toleration of a gigantic abuse of our asylum law, which can destroy irretrievably that character of Germany’s population, society and culture. The mass occupation via “asylum” and the risk of infiltration by radical jihadists presents problems which inevitably leave their mark on the everyday work of the police and army.”
Frank Franz wrote:
“This ‘population exchange’ affects us all, as does the termination of our independent statehood by the EU integration process which is intrinsically hostile to sovereignty. Those in government service should be attentive when transitory political developments threaten the fundamentals of the State’s constitution.
[quoting from the Basic Law]Article 20 para 2: All state authority emanates from the people. Articles 56 and 64: the President, Chancellor and Ministers undertake on oath to act “for the benefit of the German people”.
The very integrity and identity of that German People is at stake due to the diminishing of national self-determination and the alienation of the public.
The manner in which political criticism is made into a suspicious activity, represents a violation of human dignity and a sacrifice of free expression.
One must raise the question: to what extent does E.U. asylum policy contravene the stipulations of the Basic Law concerning “the benefit of the German people”? Has it indeed contravened this already?
As there has so far been no comparable historical experience, …this is probably the first time in the history of the Federal Republic that it is conceivable for public servants to have to bear in mind Article 20 Para 4 of the Basic Law, which states that: “if no other remedy is possible, Germans have the right to resist against anyone who seeks to abolish the constitutional order.”
As to the ongoing court-case TO BAN the NPD, the website informs that:
“NPD’s lawyer Peter Richter will argue at outset of proceedings on March 1st that the case for banning the party is so tainted by the activities of German spy agencies that there is no legitimate case to be made against the NPD.
“After the failure of a similar banning process 12 years ago – ruled unconstitutional because of the extent of German state spying operations against the party and the role of highly placed state agents – this time the state agencies have claimed that they closed down all agents operating above a certain level in the party.
“But there is absolutely no guarantee that they have complied with this order. The NPD is very dubious about a process that involves legal submissions “in camera”.
“The party will therefore attempt to have the case struck out on legal and constitutional grounds, but is also prepared if necessary to address each of the documents brought in evidence by the state and bring its own motions to introduce defence evidence.”
[ Of course, as I have witnessed first hand in courtrooms in Germany, one is reminded of the ubiquitous film “Dinner for One”, since all Germans laugh to see it screening as a standing joke on their TVs every New Years’. The matriarchal character – like the courtroom judges when asked by lawyers if evidential exhibits may be presented in defence of their “opinion crime” clients – she proclaims “No! It is to be the same procedure every year!”!! ]
The NPD does VITAL WORK in alerting the Germans – and likewise the world – that NATO and its military bases in all our countries, act not as a deterrent, but makes us targets for Zionist-lead America’s war-mongering which has created all these mutually undesired mass migrations of peoples from other lands to Europe – an unnatural migration which will bring neither peoples their necessary human sense of “ancestral home”. Humans, as with homing pigeons and other creatures on our planet, have a natural instinct for, and comforting group identity with, their ancestral “homeland”. No good can come of denying us what Nature provides in our best group interests.
On today’s news we hear Chancellor Merkel admit that she is “uncertain where the registered migrants are”… much less all the unregistered millions she has unilaterally welcomed, and wishes to invite in their tens of millions into Germany. I have heard from ordinary German citizens, overwhelmed by the colossal migrant invasion upon their towns and villages, that they feel betrayed and abused by Merkel’s tyrannical imposition of her democratic-disdaining, nation-changing policy. Thank goodness that we have the NPD to alert us to the full circumstances and consequences of this devastating onslaught on our Nature.
Long live the NPD for all our sakes in Europe!!