Germany using increasingly repressive measures against political opposition

Germany using increasingly repressive measures against political opposition

Published by carolyn on Fri, 2019-07-12 15:53

Germany’s Identitarian movement members are young and clean-cut, but the domestic intelligence agency has placed them under increased surveillance as a “verified extreme right movement.”

By Carolyn Yeager

IN THE WAKE OF THE GROWING SUCCESS of anti-migration parties and their demand for protection of the national populations in Europe, the establishmentarians that remain in power are cracking down harshly and ramping up their anti-right rhetoric against any and all they see as threats to their control. In Germany we’ve seen the treatment of Pegida (Patriotic Europeans Against the Islamisation of the West – founded in 2014), hit with bad press, frivolous lawsuits and intrusive investigation by domestic intelligence agencies. The founder of Pegida has been sidelined by Facebook in ways that make it difficult to find and read his content.

The Alternative for Germany nationalist, anti-immigrant party has also been demonized in the media and put under surveillance by the BfV, Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, and ostracized in Parliament by the group will of the other political parties. Rumors about campaign finance irregularities are circulated to impugn the honesty of the party leaders and suggest irresponsibility and corruption before it can be cleared up.

Another telling incident: Only two months ahead of the September state parliamentary election in Saxony, the election eommittee banned most of the AfD candidates because they were picked during two party congresses instead of one. Only the 18 who were selected at the first congress are eligible out of their 61 total, even though both meetings took place in Markneukirchen, which the party says should be considered as one “interrupted” party congress. The state chairman of the AfD, Joerg Urban, called it a “conspiracy” by the establishment – an effort to “weaken the strongest political competitor in the regional elections in Saxony”, where the AfD had been widely expected to do very well. The committee that made the decision was staffed entirely by the AfD’s direct competitors.

Urban said it can be difficult to find professionals to stand for the AfD because their social and professional lives are jeopardized if they do. He cited the case of Uwe Vertterlein who resigned as head of the Saxon Handball Association following controversy over his decision to stand as an AfD candidate in Dresden.

The latest victim of this reactionary pushback by the still-governing authorities is Germany’s small Identitarian movement, launched in 2012.Yesterday (Thursday) the BfV announced it was stepping up observation of the group, after designating it a far-right extremist organization. This ‘assessment’ allows the security agency to utilize ‘enhanced surveillance powers’ against the group. In a formal statement, BfV President Thomas Haldenwang said the group:

“ultimately aims to exclude people of non-European origin from democratic participation and to discriminate against them in a way that infringes their human dignity.”

“These verbal fire-raisers question people’s equality and dignity, they speak of foreign infiltration, boost their own identity to denigrate others and stoke hostile feelings towards perceived enemies.”

The German Identitarian movement is known to be very well behaved, is not associated with any sort of street violence, is estimated to have only about 600 members (at most), yet is is deemed a problem for the authorities overseeing the “most free Germany ever.”

Thomas Haldenwang, a hardliner against the political right, recently replaced the more centrist BfV president Hans-Georg Maassen over the trumped up criticism of Maassen’s handling of the misreported “riot” that took place in Chemnitz in August 2018. Since Haldenwang took over the office, the scrutiny of right-wing groups has been given priority to the point of harrassment.

Blut und Boden”

This anti-Right sentiment is part and parcel of the post-war battle againstthe idea that people are genetically linked to their ancestral homelands, have a historical right to those homelands, and can keep out foreigners who disrupt the peace and tranquility of that homeland. The contemporary idea being pushed is that migration is a right for all people – if they don’t like it where they are they cannot be stopped from forcing their way into a wealthier location and demanding support from the people there based on “humanitarian” rights.

Another giant error made is that everyone today insists they are not “racist,” but their objection to migration is based solely on preventing abuse of the migrants themselves because there are too many of them for the first-world economies to absorb. The validity of ancestral homelands for a unique people is compromised by such caving in to popular, media-approved sentiments that are destroying our European way of life. The question we should all be asking is “Why is an ancestral homeland for a unique people accepted as a right for Jews/Israelis, but not as a right for Europeans, who certainly have far more claim to their land? I think the answer is that our leaders don’t claim it for us, and listen to them!

Tony Gerber, an Identitarian spokesperson said in 2017:

“We’re not racists. We believe in equality: People may be different but they are equal. No Identitarian would say that someone else is a less worthy person because he is from a different culture, or a Muslim or refugee.”

This is thoroughly modern, but dangerous, language. If people are different, they are not equal. If they are truly equal, their differences shouldn’t matter. People can all be worthy without being equal. We have to be able to emphasize the differences.

*     *     *     *

In the USA, the World Jewish Congress supports recycled, previously failed Holocaust Education bill

‘The Never Again Education Act’ was reintroduced in January by Representative Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) after failing to be enacted at a previous session of Congress. I wrote about it herejust last year.

The bill would federally mandate and fund a holocaust education grant program run by the Department of Education to provide teachers with training and tools to teach students about “the repercussions that hate and intolerance can have on our society.”

The World Jewish Congress has called on the US Congress to make Holocaust education mandatory in all US schools. The WJC started a petition late last week following recently released statistics that found 49% of millennials polled are unable to name one Nazi death camp, while 41% believed that the number of Jews killed in the Holocaust was significantly less than six million.

“The horrors of the Holocaust are fading from our collective memory, especially among millennials,” WJC explained, adding (the lie) that there has also been an “alarming rise” in antisemitism in the US over the last few years.

What’s alarming is that this education act would create a federal law covering all K-12 schools in the United States—no schools or states can opt out!

If this isn’t Jewish domination of the citizens of the United States, I don’t know what is. Enforcing learning by young children of one small religious group’s self-serving mythology, NOT BACKED BY SCIENCE OR FORENSICS, and historically controversial, is an insane thing for Americans to do. Let your congressman or congresswoman know that you’re against this anti-American bill and you want to see it soundly defeated once and for all.

Rewriting Reality: Canada’s Cultural Marxist Elite Loses Its Grip

Rewriting Reality: Canada’s Cultural Marxist Elite Loses Its Grip
[Great Toronto meeting tonight. An honour to meet one of the courageous pastors who [prayerfully confronted the Hamilton LGBTQ sexually confused in Gage Park. He recounted the vicious assaults by the pink bandanna clad Antifa.. I brought the house down with laughter about the criminal antics of transgendered
Cedar Hopperton. I don’t make this crazy shit up.]
HEAR PAUL FROMM — “REWRITING REALITY” — Toronto, Thursday, July 11, 2019
The Canadian Association for Free Expression Proudly Presents
Paul Fromm
Director, Canadian Association for Free Expression
Winner of the George Orwell Free Speech Award, 1994
Rewriting Reality: Canada’s Cultural Marxist Elite Loses Its Grip
*Humour is “hate” — YOUR WARD NEWS case
* Yellow vests & anti-carbon tax protests mean “assassinations”
* Jewish lobby presses for more and more silencing of dissent
* Silencing MPs — the Michael Cooper case
* Schemes to re-introduce Sec. 13 (Internet censorship)
* The Kevin Goudreau case

UN official admits there is NO LEGAL DEFINITION of “hate speech”

UN official admits there is NO LEGAL DEFINITION of “hate speech”

The Rebel

Ezra Levant and Sheila Gunn Reid are in London to cover the so-called Defend Media Freedom Conference, which is being run by the British and Canadian governments.

During a question and answer session, Sheila asked UN Special Rapporteur on Free Speech, David Kaye, about the UN’s campaign against “hate speech and Islamophobia”.

His answer will shock you.

David Kaye admitted that there is no legal definition of “hate speech”. You almost have to hear it to believe it.

WATCH our video to see his full statement:

If globalists organizing a censorship campaign haven’t decided on a legal definition for “hate speech”, how on earth can we trust them not to use it to silence their critics — critics like The Rebel?

Yours truly,

The Rebel Team

Free Speech Activist Gordon Watson to Lay Charges Against Oak Bay Rabble Who Attacked Jenn Smith Meeting

Free Speech Activist Gordon Watson to Lay Charges Against Oak Bay Rabble Who Attacked Jenn Smith Meeting

Private Information background Oak Bay Uproar


Following is a background submission to go along with the criminal charges I’ll be laying tomorrow against the leaders of the UpRoar in Oak Bay on May 2nd

this email app. has disturbed the formatting. but = other than that = if you see anything in it that needs to be corrected,  typographical errors or major mistakes, please let me know.

Gordon S Watson


01     Item 1 of the Materials to be Relied Upon is the letter which I sent to Del Manak Chief of Police for Victoria, after an incident at the Legislature on September 29th 2018.

02     Item 2  is a copy of the private Information I layed against Marianne ALTO arising out of the incident at the Legislature.

03     Item 3  is a copy of the notice from Crown Counsel staying my private Information  BEFORE  the process hearing

04    Item 4 is a copy of my letter to the Chief Judge of the Provincial Court along with a copy of her reply.


05         Items 1 through 4 are supplied in order to give background as to what was going on in the political controversy to do with the so-called  “trans-gender” issue before the incident in Oak Bay out of which these charges arise.    As of the date of the Uproar in Oak Bay, I still had time to Petition a Justice in the Supreme Court for Judicial Review of the ‘stay’ of my charge against Miss ALTO on the ground that what Crown Counsel Joel Gold did was flagrantly improper.   In light of what happened on May second, I decided to ditch Judicial Review of the way the charge had been stifled and concentrate having leaders of the riot at Windsor Pavillion held liable.
Suffice to say : from my experience on the frontlines of the anti-abortion fray, nigh-on a quarter of a century ago, in which Marianne ALTO was one of the feminsts then arrayed against me,   I knew that the nonsense visited on us on September 29th 2018 at the Legislature, led by her and the likes of Hope WARREN was only a warm-up.    Item  5   is a photograph from the local newspaper illustrating how thoroughly-involved Marianne ALTO is in the transgender political movement.   The fact that my charge against her was stayed   BEFORE  it even came before a Justice in the Process Hearing    proves that the Criminal Justice Branch is prejudiced on this topic.    Had Marianne ALTO been prosecuted,    the outrage at the Windsor Pavillion would not have happened.

06       Chris McCay had obtained a permit from the District of Oak Bay for use of the Windsor Pavillion so a guy who calls himself “Jenn Ricky Smith” could present his political opinion pertaining to the SOGI123 program.  The essence of Smith’s presentation is set out in his essay entitled  Synanon, the Brainwashing “Game” and Modern Transgender Activism: The Orwellian Implications of Transgender Politics.  He explains why the Apotemnophiliac cult is so dangerous.   The meeting was advertised via the internet as being open to the public with no entry fee.    I went to it, partly, to ask Smith questions about who financed SOGI123.      As well, I wanted to hear his response to questions put to him by others.

07         At the FaceBook page of Freedom Free for All are video recordings made at the Windsor Pavillion at Willow Park in Oak Bay British Columbia on May second 2019.   They show the Accused in full throat leading the mob disrupting the meeting.  Those videos evidence the crime of mischief incited by the Accused.  Particularly, that PAINTER, WARREN and HENRY intended to, and did, interfere with the rights of Persons who had come to the meeting to hear Mr Smith and to dialogue with him on the topic of SOGI123 being imposed on school children.

08         Item  6  is material printed out from the internet of commentaries by Jenn Ricky Smith as to what went on at the Windsor Pavillion at Willow Park on the evening of May 2nd 2019

09     Item  7   is the opinion of Dr Charles Lugosi who was on the scene.      It is important the Court appreciate the calibre of who says this –  one of the world’s experts in Common Law, having been a professor of law at Universities in Canada and the united States of America.    He was counsel in cases in the Supreme Court of Canada and also the Supreme Court of the united States of America.

10     Item   8   is my letter to the District of Oak Bay,   summarizing what I saw go down at the Windsor Pavillion on May second 2019


11     Item  9  is what the UVic  Martlet  newspaper printed about the Uproar

12      Item 10  is the Media Release by the Oak Bay Police along with Jenn Smith’s rebuttal

13         At the Process Hearing I shall apply for a subpoena de tecum upon Christian Michael McCay.      In order for me to make my full submission,   I need him to take the witness stand and give evidence as to what he saw and heard in the incident.   More particularly : Mr McCay will identify the Accused from images on the videorecordings.  And also, give evidence as to the oral agreement he had with the Oak Bay Police that they would be present at that place and time to provide security for the event.  Especially, what he knows about the 911 ECOM centre hanging up on callers from the Windsor Pavillion who were demanding police attend the riot.      Further ; what he was told after the incident why the police did not do their duty to keep the Peace.  All, going to my contention that there was a criminal conspiracy to which Mayor Kevin Murdoch and Chief Brinton and the Accused Ryan PAINTER, Rose HENRY and Hope WARREN were parties,   to let the mob make so much of a disturbance that the authorities would have an excuse to shut down Mr Smith’s presentation.

14         At the Process Hearing I shall apply for a subpoena de tecum upon Davinder Daleep who is a constable with the Oak Bay police.  The videorecordings which form part of the evidence for my charges show him in the room in plain clothes during the riot.      He will say the Oak Bay police had foreknowledge there would be trouble that evening and they were aware Ryan PAINTER  had organized the mob to show up and interfere with the normal use of that place.

15         At the Process Hearing I shall apply for a subpoena de tecum upon Constable Montaro who was on the scene during the riot.   The videorecordings which form part of the evidence for my charges show him in the room in plain clothes.    He will say the Oak Bay police had foreknowledge there would be trouble that evening and they were aware Ryan PAINTER  was one of the people organizing the mob via the internet.  He will corroborate the sentence in the Media Release put out by the Oak Bay police, to wit : Smith’s words did not reach the audience do  [ sic ] to loud chants,  yelling and noisemakers of the protesters that surrounded him and his audience

16         At the Process Hearing I shall apply for a subpoena de tecum upon Josh Steffler.  Videorecordings of the riot show him in the crowd at the scene of the crimes.    He was there representing his business namely Freedom Free for All, which publishes news and commentary about politics in Victoria on the internet.   I require him to take the witness stand to substantiate provenance of the videorecordings, as well as to identify the Accused Ryan PAINTER, Rose HENRY, Hope WARREN and a certain member of the Victoria City Council who was in the crowd.  Mr Steffler will submit a videorecording that has the voice of an Oak Bay police officer answering the lack of police presence : “that was a decision not made by us. That was a decision made by management and by …umm… the Chief and also city hall.”  – in context meaning Mayor Kevin Murdoch,  Chief of Police Brinton and others yet to be ascertained – deliberately let Ryan PAINTER and his group of protesters cause so much trouble that there would then be an excuse to shut down Jenn Ricky Smith’s presentation

17         A few years ago Madame Justice Risa Levine said on the Bench that I am “a longtime political activist”.   From that 25 years’ experience I know that the Uproar at the Windsor Pavillion was staged for a political purpose, ie.  – to counteract efforts by citizens who adamantly oppose the SOGI123 program being imposed on children in the public schools.
The incident out of which my charges arise originate with the Human Right Commission complaint by Ronan / Morgane Oger © against Bill Whatcott, as Mister OGER acknowledged in the videorecording found on one of the FaceBook pages administered by Ryan PAINTER. At the Process Hearing I shall play that videorecording.     It is most important that the Court grasp the fact that Ryan PAINTER solicited and did gather-in funds to pay for Ronan / Morgane © OGER to attend the incident.
In fact, Devyn Cousineau had been a long-time political activist with the “Transgender community”.  David Eby appointed her to preside over the Human Rights Tribunal OGER versus Whatcott,   the central issue of which, was = allegation Whatcott had illegally insulted NDP election candidate OGER by warning voters he was a liar.   AG Eby interposing Devyn Cousineau into that Tribunal demonstrates how shameless the New Democratic Party government is, intruding itself into the Justice system.    Beyond doubt,  appointment of Cousineau  – AFTER the matter was underway ! – was not done in good faith,  but only to ensure that her ruling would criminalize people who criticize implications to the public of the Apotemnophiliac cult.
I believe that Attorney General Eby’s refusal to comply with my current demand pursuant to the  Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act  for records to do with Cousineau’s appointment,  then the staying of my Information against Marianne ALTO, are parts of a co-ordinated covert NDP agenda for staving-off scrutiny of its obstruction of Justice within the “transgender” controversy.  And that the commotion at the Windsor Pavillion was intended to demonize critics.  The NDP is terrified that those of us who are critical of the SOGI123 program will get the facts about the cult being funded by provincial monies ; ESPECIALLY that those funds flow to friends of the NDP
I believe that AG Eby and persons yet to be identified in his administration are framing-up for prosecution men whom they perceive as political enemies of the NDP.   Which is what happened to me in the early 1990s, when Deputy Premier Elizabeth Cull proclaimed me her “enemy”. Then … arising from my anti-abortion activity … I had exposed the NDP’s private bank [ the Nanaimo Commonwealth Holding society ]  using the NDP-controlled ‘non-profit societies’ operating the abortion clinics,  laundering public fund$ back to the New Democratic Party.  Notes taken by his executive assistant at the meeting in June 1993 at 815 Hornby St. Vancouver with the abortion industry lobbyists,  show Attorney General Gabelmann did direct the head of the Criminal Justice Branch – namely Ernest Quantz – to go after me and prosecute me selectively because of my political activity.     In Court, I proved that Mr Quantz set out to contrive an incident on the public sidewalk outside an abortuary so that I would be put to trial on criminal charges.   At the conclusion of one of those trials, Provincial Court Judge Keith Libby opined “there is probably more truth than not to Watson’s assertion that they are spinning a web to catch him”   direct quote.
Those who would wish-away what I say about NDP corruption back then, better read the report of the Commission in to the Nanaimo Commonwealth Holding Society.  When NDP partisans proffer the notion that “the Peck Report exonerated AG Gabelmann’, bear in mind that Richard Peck Q. C. was in a partnership with lawyer Michael Tammen.  A year later I found out that … by the most amazing co-incidence! … Mr Tammen was Colin Gabelmann’s personal lawyer at that very time / summer of 1994.    In those days,  a partnership at law was seen as one Person.     Thus, Mr Gabelmann had the luxury of having my allegation against him for Perjury investigated by his own lawyer.


18         Back then,  contracts the Everywoman’s and Elizabeth Bagshaw societies had with the Province of BC in the early 1990s stipulated that a certain percentage of the gross income to each of the abortion clinics was to be payed to another pretended federal “charity”.  From whence it was then covertly payed to the global account of the NCHS in Nanaimo. NDP cabinet minister Dave Stupich boasted that he ‘had created an omlette that no-one could un-scramble’.  But at trial, Special Prosecutor Don Sorochan did just that : Stupich went to prison.

The similarity of the NDP govt. fomenting prosecution of Pro-Lifers in the 1990s set alongside what’s going on now in the “trans-gender” controversy, is obvious  ie.  Critics of the NDP found out that funds are being disbursed from public accounts to “non profit societies”  to finance ‘experimental medicine’   read :  quackery  upon 500 [ five hundred ] children in care of the Province at Children’s Hospital.    Notably;    the Morgane Oger Foundation headed by NDP vice president Ronan / Morgane Oger © his-self.

19     Guided by life-long communist Geoff Meggs = now Premier Horgan’s right-hand man =  the NDP is again using the communist tactic of causing trouble at street level as an excuse for demonizing its critics.  The Uproar at Willow Park was such a piece of political theatre.     Professional agitators, personified by Hope Warren’s clenched fist as seen in the videos, the very hallmark of communism…  stoked the emotions of the crowd so that opposition to the “trans-gender” cult can be framed into a Human Rights complaint Soviet-style show-trial,  wherein the Defendant will be portrayed as a “hater”.   Listen closely to the soundtrack of the videorecordings and you can hear the leaders of the mob yelling the classic communist smears “Nazi !!!” and “white supremecist” !!! 

20                 I am a private citizen, not a lawyer :    I bring these Informations because I have good reason to believe that controversy arising from resentment against the BC Human Rights Code being amended without consultation with those directly affected,    is being exploited by the NDP administration to obstruct / pervert Justice.    As the Code now is, someone gets prosecuted for publishing his opinion about harms done to individual children and also to the Public Health system by the “trans-gender” cult.  When NDP vice-president Ronan OGRE dragged Bill Whatcott in to that Human Rights Tribunal there was calculated interference from Attorney General Eby into the process.   When I demanded of the Ministry of AG copies of certain documents which expose Mr Eby for having appointed Devyn Cousineau to the Tribunal, improperly,  they frustrated me.   I have been unjustifiably prevented getting information about the influence of NDP vice-president OGER into the Tribunal process in which he was the Complainant.  Not least of all : Miss Cousineau being an accomplice to OGER committing Perjury in that matter.
21         It is no mere co-incidence that the individual who uses the name Morgane Oger © for his political purposes was on the scene at the Uproar in Oak Bay on May second 2019.  OGER, PAINTER, WARREN and HENRY set out to bring it about as a tactical manoeuvre.  At the Process Hearing I will submit evidence proving that OGER conversed with Mayor Murdoch in advance.  I strongly suspect that OGER used his influence as a vice-president of the NDP to have the provincial Chief Law Enforcement Officer – that being David Eby –  order police to stand back and let the Accused disrupt a legitimate public meeting.    Their primary purpose being :   intimidating citizens who opposed the SOGI123 program – especially,  others who heard about the riot via the newsmedia –  from participating in the democratic process.

22         I intend to take the witness stand at the Process Hearing.  The witnesses I want to call to it will give evidence, partly in the form of a videorecording made after the Uproar,   proving that the lack of uniformed police that moment was arranged with the Mayor of Oak Bay and the Chief of Police Brinton.   Josh Steffler can identify the Oak Bay police officer whose voice is heard on one of them admitting that he and his fellow officers were ordered NOT to show up.   That, set alongside the Media Release published by the Oak Bay Police,   goes directly to the aspect of my charges that – since the acts of the Accused undeniably did interfere with my right to participate in the democratic process, and also, my right to freedom of speech for dialoguing with Jenn Smith  –  then the Accused certainly did contravene section 180 of the Criminal Code.

23         On the witness stand at the Process Hearing I will show the videorecordings to substantiate that,  via his activity on the internet prior to the event,   Ronan OGER aka Morgane Oger © did urge people to show up for Jenn Smith’s presentation.   I will submit photos of the members of the crowd parading upstairs to the room where Smith was preparing his projector and sound equipment.     The mob didn’t just suddenly spontaneously go into the Windsor Pavillion a propos nothing at all ; Ryan PAINTER and Ronan /Morgane OGER © prompted them to do so.  Thus, via its Agent OGER the New Democratic Party is an accomplice before the fact in the criminal conspiracy to commit the crimes committed there.

24         UN-learned as I am in the law, I believe that I have the right to have a Justice hear me out on my private Information before an Agent for the Attorney General steps in to the matter.  If the Criminal Justice Branch again attempts to stay these Informations before the Process Hearing then I certainly shall apply for Judicial Review of such UN-reasonable interference with my right to lay criminal charges











item                                                                               mentioned at paragraph
1          my letter to Chief Manak                                                                        1

2          private Information charging Marianne Alto                                      2

3          Notice of stay of my charge against Alto                                            3

4          letter to Chief Judge and response                                                       4

5          photo of Marianne Alto from Times Colonist newspaper 5

6          Jenn Smith’s comments on the UpRoar                                               8

7          comment by Dr Charles Lugosi                                                             9

8          my letter to District of Oak Bay                                                    10

9          article published in the Martlet U Vic newspaper                               11

10        Police Media Release and Jenn Smith’s rebuttal                                12

The United Nation’s LGBTQ Agenda to Indoctrinate Children Worldwide.

The United Nation’s LGBTQ Agenda to Indoctrinate Children Worldwide.


The UN LGBTQ Agenda to Indoctrinate Children Worldwide.

Exposing the Driving Force Behind the LGBTQ Political Movement.

The following Report is an Alert advising of the current war we find ourselves in, for the hearts
and minds of our children, against Sexually Deviant Activists pushing unscientific and trans
ideology in an attempt to deconstruct the family and cultural norms. This report is intended to
equip Elected officials, Leaders of the Church, and all Citizens with facts and resources
necessary to counter the lies and misinformation. We must be informed and no longer permit
the soft language of inclusion, acceptance and equality to silence the critical opposition
necessary to preserve a strong, moral, and democratic society. To protect Freedom of
Speech and Freedom of Belief.

This article is a publication, with hyper-links, to important information. Please ‘click’ on the
hyper-links (
highlighted) in order to be fully informed.

There are legitimate concerns and significant objections to the ever-increasing amount of
political propaganda associated with the LGBTQ2+ sex activist lobby initiated by the United
Nations, directed at our children and society as a whole.

This includes:

 Comprehensive Sex Education, Eg, SOGI 123 BC schools (indoctrination) (more
information below)
• Changing the Human Rights Act to include gender expression and gender identity

• Pride Parades (warning graphic images)
 Rainbow crosswalks , Flags,
 Rainbow stickers (intended to create ‘safe’ spaces? Do we assume these spaces were
unsafe prior to the stickers or is it propaganda?)
 Public Imagery (please sign petition)
• media, legal documents, forced pronouns, women’s/children’s private spaces, attacks
against personal beliefs and convictions, freedom of speech, businesses, etc.

The creator of the Pride flag, Gilbert Baker, did not mince words when he declared its meaning,

“That’s what flags are for. “Flags are about proclaiming power”… that
visibility is Key to our success and to our justice.”

With this in mind…do we want the rainbow flag being raised at our schools claiming
power over our youth? …or our cities?

The loud voice afforded to the LGBTQ2++ activists must be tempered and it is imperative that

the voice of reason, rationale and commonsense prevail.


To be clear, opposition is not against the individual peacefully living their lives. It is aimed

directly at those who are attacking Canadian’s Rights, Freedoms and Democracy. The

LGBTQ 2++ activists are attempting to mask their intentions as a noble cause yet cloaked in

deceptive language. This is not a harmless, benign agenda to promote inclusion, anti-bullying

and equivalent human rights.


The once earnest cause to support the LGBTQ community has mutated into an ideological

demonization of hetero-normativity by the LGBTQ2++ political movement which now exploits

the gay and lesbian community using them to vilify and attack our society’s concepts of

gender. Disguised as “Social Justice Warriors” the political movement is inflicting and

imposing lies and misinformation in order to advance their agenda to deconstruct the family,

remove parental rights and sexualize our children.


Anyone who does not agree is attacked using hateful bullying tactics, labelling those who

oppose as Nazi, Alt Right, homophobic, transphobic, intolerant, bigots. Victimization of this

group has enabled manipulation of our anti-hate laws wherein you can now be convicted for

your ‘Speech’. Opposition is no longer a Freedom. It has been replaced by the “Thought

Police”. The Sex Activists no longer strive for acceptance, their goal is domination of ‘their’



The Canadian Human Rights Act, both federally and provincially, was specifically amended to

give special privilege to the LGBTQ community by adding ‘gender identity and gender

expression’ – an unnecessary decision as the Charter of Rights and Freedoms already

covered the protection of citizens equally.


Section 15 (1): “Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the

equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination”.


However, the amendment now permits individuals to force unscientific delusions on the rest of

society and demands, not only acceptance, but participation. If you refuse to comply there is

the risk of being dragged before the Human Rights Council, thus being forced to forfeit

freedom of thought and belief.


The change to the Human Rights Code is in conflict with the provision of rights permitted in

the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The HR code must be challenged and



The “Duty of State Neutrality” also stipulates neutrality must be adhered to and upheld by

elected officials, who must do so without favour and in respect of the law. Giving special rights

to one group is divisive and unlawful.

The Supreme Court of Canada addressed this issue in Mouvement laïque québécois v. Saguenay
(City), 2015 SCC 16, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 3 (para 72 -74). it stated:


• [73]…“When the state adheres to a belief, it is not merely expressing an opinion on the subject. It is creating a hierarchy of beliefs and casting doubt on the value of those it does not share. It is also ranking the individuals who hold such beliefs:

• [74]”By expressing no preference, the state ensures that it preserves a neutral public space that is free of discrimination and in which true freedom to believe or not to believe is enjoyed by everyone equally, given that everyone is valued equally.

The UN Convention on the Rights of a Child supports parental rights in raising children and determining best practices. Article 14;[2]

• [2] Parties shall respect the rights and duties of the parents and, when applicable, legal guardians, to provide direction to the child in the exercise of his or her right in a manner consistent with the evolving capacities of the child.

UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights 26(3)

• (3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

In spite of this, there is currently a dangerous agenda, set by the UN “Human Rights Council” who appointed an LGBTQ Czar, Vitit Muntarbhorn, to ensure ‘every’ UN Member Nation complies with the following 5 point mandate:

 decriminalize sodomy,

 prevent mental health professionals from treating homosexuality as a disorder,

 ensure legal documents reflect individuals’ subjective gender identity,

• impose social acceptance of homosexuality, including by challenging religions,

• and indoctrinating children and society through propaganda at all levels.

UN Goals For Humanity Target Children as “Agents of Change”.

It comes in the form of the aforementioned Comprehensive Sexuality EducationIt is supported by theUNFPA , UNICEF, IPPF, UNESCO and the UN World Health Organization. CSE is a program that “seeks to change sexual and gender norms in children as early as possible”. Instructing children 0-4 to be taught about masturbation, 4-6 to be taught about same sex relationships, etc.

The UN’s edict is already a full reality in Canada with the overwhelming support and endorsement from the Prime Minister and the Liberal and NDP governments.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau lowered the age of anal sex from 18 to 16 in support of the UNHRC’s objective.

The depth of sexual depravity has no limit, opening the door to incest and bestiality.

Bill C-16 (known as the bathroom bill) amended the Canadian Human Rights Act, federally, to add gender identity and gender expression to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination aligning with the demands of the UNHRC, allowing –

• men into women’s washrooms and change rooms, putting women and children at risk.

 boys into girls change rooms and bathrooms

• boys/men to compete in girls/women’s sports.

• access to women’s prisons and women’s shelters.

**Note**- the majority of transgender males are fully intact. Consider the risks for women in shelters andprisons.

Consider the sacrifice of women athletes, who train vigorously to compete, only to be outdone by a male counterpart. Losing scholarships and opportunities. Is a transgender’s journey to glory more important than a biological woman’s?

Gender Neutral bathrooms, in High Schools, “Students” are protesting decision. Boys and Girls are being forced to use the same bathroom and showers. Open space between stalls, risk of filming.

One of the most heinous organizations is one in which paedophiles are re-branding themselves as “MAPs” or “Minor Attracted Persons” in an effort to gain acceptance and sympathy and be included into the LGBT community. The blanket term MAP includes infantophiles (infants), paedophiles (pre-pubescent children), hebephiles (pubescent children), and ephebophiles (post-pubescent children). Having gone so far as to create their own flag. Refer to Video exposing the push for Paedophilia (**full version).

Gender neutral and non-binary pronouns have been imposed, no matter how illogical.

A beauty pageant in Spain recently allowed a transgender male to participate… and win. And will now be the first biological male to compete in the Miss Universe Pageant. “There are women with a penis and men with a vagina, because the only key part of being a woman is to be and feel like a woman,” ‘she’ said.

The transgender movement is fraudulently attacking the unique creation, value and beauty of womanhood and emasculating boys/men and their unique creation and strengths.

Facts about transgenderism.

An egregious component of the LGBTQ agenda is against individuals who are caught in this lifestyle and may be victims of childhood abuse. Whether sexual, physical, or emotional, it has had a powerful and lasting effect on the psyche and, if left untreated, manifests itself in the form of self-abuse such as drugs, alcohol, eating disorders, depression, suicidal tendencies, self-mutilation and unhealthy relationships. Due to the gross agenda of the radical LGBTQ2+, these individuals are being exploited and marginalized rather than genuinely being supported through counselling and care in a safe and healthy environment.

A priority of the Homosexual Agenda is to prohibit and outlaw conversion therapy, particularly for teenagers. This is an attack against a parent’s right to provide counselling for their child. Vancouver has banned conversion therapy and several U.S. states have enacted such laws. This would effectively ban all forms of therapy or the sale of material to help anyone who sought freedom from homosexual urges or gender confusion to seek faith-based counselling and resources.

Conversion Therapy Report – In debunking the LGBTQ’s claim that Conversion Therapy is ineffective former chief psychologist “Nicholas A. Cummings, declares, “Gays and lesbians have the right to be affirmed in their homosexuality.” However, he also wrote in USA Today that “of the patients I oversaw who sought to change their orientation, “Hundreds were successful”.

Good News – Recent push back in California by faith-based organizations, family counselors, church leaders,OnceGay and citizens alike, recently defeated a bill to ban conversion therapy.

Puberty blockers have been approved for children/youth who are questioning their gender. Despite the fact that, statistically, 80–95% of children work through confusion to eventually embrace their birth gender if not discouraged from doing so. In an effort to force parents to comply, new Ontario law allows gov’t to seize children if parents oppose their gender identity. Puberty blockers are extremely harmful and leaves permanent damage. Puberty blockers sterilize children. Invasive surgery has been approved for youth, removing perfectly healthy body parts. Youth are not permitted to vote, buy alcohol or drugs until they are 18 or 19 but life-changing, permanent surgery, mutilating their bodies, is somehow acceptable. This is child abuse.

Individuals who have undergone sex reassignment surgery have a 20 times greater rate of committing suicide than the general population.

Sex Change Regret Stories. those who underwent “sex change” operations but then experienced regret and ended up accepting their biological sex.

“Sex is a binary biological characteristic of the human person that is established by our DNA at conception.One is conceived either male or female. Gender, in contrast, is a term that refers to the psychological and cultural characteristics associated with biological sex. Gender identity refers to an individual’s awareness of being male or female and is sometimes referred to as an individual’s “experienced gender.” Gender identity has to do with thoughts and feelings.”

Pediatrician explains why the transgender movement is a fraud.

American College of Pediatricians reports Gender Ideology Harms Children.

Health hazards of homosexuality and mounting health care costs. Syphilis rates continue to climb amongst gay men as well as oral cancer and anal cancer. “Among men who have sex with men (MSM), the incidence of anal cancer is significantly more prevalent and increasing annually”, as reported by the National LGBT Cancer Network.

In BC, taxpayers are covering the full cost for individuals to receive HIV prevention medication.$15,000/per year per person. While diabetics, and others, are forced to pay for their life-saving drugs, gay men, who choose to take part in risky sex, are fully covered.

“Millions” of taxpayer dollars are paid every year, throughout the provinces, to fund LGBTQ2+ organizations.

Gladd is the media arm of the LGBTQ (USA). It “works with news, entertainment, sports, and

social media in an attempt to share LGBT stories in an aim to change society.” “GLAAD has already empowered itself by being able to use a mass communication tool to build and frame its agenda with the assistance of the mass media. …Furthermore, less appealing truths are avoided in an aim to strategically advance the organization’s goals for an overall perceived greater good, even at the potential harm created by such avoidance”. EGALE is a Canadian version.

Flags and Crosswalks – A method of self-victimization is advancing the LGBTQ’s movement. The rainbow crosswalk and flag are key to their progress as they conquer one city/school after another, claiming these symbols are inclusive of everyone.

The pride parades are vile, exposing children to degeneracy, nudity, perversion, bondage and extreme sexual fetishes and indecent acts. (Warning graphic images) If parents took their child to a strip club the child would very likely be removed from the parent’s care, yet taking children to Pride ‘Festivals” is acceptable.

Foster care and adoption. There are growing instances wherein traditional families are being demonized and priority is being given to placing children with gay couples, despite children having lived for many years in a traditional home, and the foster parent’s willingness to adopt them.The best interest of the child is being overlooked, yielding to a Political agenda.

In July 2016 the BC Human Rights Code was changed to include ‘gender identity or expression’ (Bill 27),provincially, without the public’s awareness… yet 100 sex activists showed up for the vote. Then BC Premier, Christi Clarke, reportedly, ordered her MLA’s to vote in support or else! 1st, 2nd and 3rd reading all in one day. This opened the door…very timely….to secretly launch the SOGI 123 Resource Sept./2016 into numerous school districts.

Around the world this agenda is rapidly progressing. Once the Human Rights Code is amended to include ‘gender identity and expression’, opposition is stifled and the invasive sex-ed resource follows shortly thereafter.

SOGI 123 Resource is an example of what is being integrated into every facet of the Canadian Education system beginning in Kindergarten to grade 12. Including the indoctrination of teachers (a UBC program is required to obtain degree). The resource teaches and promotes normalization of homosexuality, transgenderism and gender dysphoria. Parental rights are being violated and the resource is a threat to our child’s identity, values, morals and religious beliefs.

SOGI teaches children that gender is fluid, they can be a boy, a girl, anything in between or neither,teaching explicit sexual behaviour well beyond their intellectual capacity. Instructing teachers they can no longer use the term boy and girl, mother and father, pink or blue, stick people, removing celebratingmother’s/father’s day in school, to question parental authority, etc…the list goes on. (Refer to further SOGI resource links provided below).

Drag Queen story time for children in schools and public librariesThe trend began in San Francisco and is quickly moving throughout Canadian public libraries.

The BC Ministry of Education is demanding every child be taught the SOGI 123 resource and has intentionally intertwined it throughout the curriculum to ensure parents cannot have their child opt out.

SOGI 123 was created by the ARC foundation in partnership with the BC Ministry of Education, BC Teacher’s Federation, UBC Faculty of Education and local, national and international, LGBTQ community organizations. *** Sogi Backgrounder

**Note** – No Child Psychologist or Parental input was given in the development of the SOGI 123 Resource.

The resource was created in violation of The 1989, Order in Council Statement of Education Policy Order which requires that parents participate in the development of policies.

The OIC states:

• Parents: have the right and responsibility to participate in the process of determining the educational goals, policies and services provided for their children. They have a primary responsibility to ensure that children are provided with the healthy and supportive environment necessary for learning. They have a responsibility to help shape and support the goals of the school system and to share in the tasks of educating their young.

The BC School Act also states that parents are entitled to be informed of a student’s behaviour and progress in school and that a parent may consult with school staff with respect to the student’s educational program, yet, in spite of these legal privileges that are granted to parents, the SOGI 123 agenda uses “confidentiality” as grounds for not involving parents in this crucial part of their child’s education.

Alberta recently passed a bill prohibiting parents from being informed if their child joins a GSA (Gay Straight Alliance) club at school. GSA’s are supported by organizations who produce gay porn.

SOGI was a Trojan horse, brought into schools under the guise of anti-bullying and to teach children to be “Inclusive” and support LGBTQ2+ students. However, the SOGI 123 resource goes way beyond this to indoctrinating kids into unhealthy sexual behaviour and confusion through lies and misinformation.

Many teachers and parents are unaware of the resource as the Ministry of Education has intentionally neglected to inform the public. Parents are also unaware that activities have been in place in schools, for many years, that seemed benign, but were also created by the ARC foundation, ‘Out in Schools‘ (warning graphic), the Queer Film Festival, and others directly associated with the LGBTQ political movement. ‘Out in Schools’ is associated with the Queer Film Festival who produce gay porn. **The ARC foundation, reportedly, funds the Queer Film Festival. The websites have exposed students to explicit gay porn.

An example of an activity held without parental consent or knowledge is Sex at LunchHosted by teachers for students at a Vancouver public high school. The students were instructed not to tell theirs parents.

It is vital for parents to engage their children and youth in conversation.

Take Action…Print, sign and present the following Declaration of Family Rights to your school principal and take authority over your child’s education. Please read the instructions carefully.

This political agenda can be revoked. But parents, educators and leaders, must get involved. In Ontario, under the leadership of a new provincial government, the Wynne sex-ed curriculum is currently being repealed due to the strong opposition of Parents As First Educators (PAFE). An organization who are rallying parents through a grassroots movement. In BCCulture Guard is working tirelessly to do the same.

Society is being turned upside down for the trans community who make up approximately.01% of the population (combined LGBTQ 3%).

The LGBTQ2+ Political Lobby group are not interested in creating genuine unity but instead, because of their consistent overreach into every facet of society, are provoking resentment due to their contentious demands…thus the political symbol of the crosswalk in turn becomes a contentious matter as is the flag. This is a massive movement viciously imposing their agenda by forging through society voraciously consuming anything in its path that does not agree or conform to their ideology. They trample on the Charter Rights of all faith groups, Christians, fellow citizens, and create unequal rights, for a small, select group, with venomous precision. The double standard, through their intolerance and mean spirited attacks against individuals, the family unitchurchesbusinessesand universities, is evidence.

Elected Officials, Teachers and Parents who have naively decided to support the SOGI 123 resource, rainbow crosswalks and the raising of the flags, may have had good intentions but truly need to step back and understand the detrimental consequences of the LGBTQ2+ movement. It is a Social Engineering Propaganda machine. Accomplished through manipulating our laws, our sense of fairness, compassion and sympathy.

Hiding behind the beauty of the rainbow does not negate the evil it now encompasses.

The original biblical meaning of the Rainbow is one of grace for humanity and undeserved favour.

Reportedly the Prime Minister and every Liberal and NDP (NDPleader, as well as some in the Conservative party, support Bill C-16 and the LGBTQ2+ agenda.

Governments, including our school boards, which we support with our taxes, and which we have helped to elect, are misusing their powers to undermine parental authority and institute this harmful propaganda.

Therefore it is time to:

• Scrutinize the values and policies of ‘every’ elected official – School Trustees, City Councilors, Mayors, MLA’s, MP’s, etc.

• Demand the Canadian Government pull out of the UN.

• Demand ‘gender expression and gender identity’ be removed from the Human Rights

Code, both provincially and federally.

We respect an individual’s right to live according to their own beliefs but when it so forcefully impedes on the rights of others, with such devastating consequences, there must be fierce, swift and righteous opposition.

Rise up Canada, Rise up Parents and Leaders, from all faith groups and backgrounds!

The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil

is for good men to do nothing!

Edmund Burke

Join organizations who are working to make a difference.

Volunteer, donate, write letters!

Our friends at Culture Guard are taking strong positive action against SOGI 123, and all political propaganda Nationwide. We have the the power to unite and generate change. Legal action, as well, is forthcoming. View brochure for details.

Sign up to Culture Guard and be informed of meetings, rallies and events to inform the public and give support to leaders and teachers. AKA CultureGuard.

Thank you,

From the Team at CC4RG


Join CC4RG

Canadian Coalition For Responsible Government

Protecting Rights and Freedoms

“Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the

Supremacy of God and the rule of law”


Travesty of British Justice: Tommy Robinson – Guilty!

Travesty of British Justice: Tommy Robinson – Guilty!


For years, Tommy Robinson has worked to save English communities from the destructive effects of Islamization – the rape culture, religious bigotry, violence, intolerance, and suppression of free speech – and for years he has been defamed for it. His interviews and activism show him a passionate defender of British liberty and the rule of law, yet authorities treat him as a menace. Critics have unjustly called him a racist and an Islamophobe despite his good faith outreach to moderates of all racial and religious backgrounds.


On numerous occasions, he has been physically attacked, has received death threats, and has had his family menaced. Slander and verbal abuse follow him everywhere. The police have repeatedly arrested him on the thinnest of pretexts.


Tommy Robinson personifies moral courage in an age when such courage is an extremely rare commodity, the possession of which can threaten one’s life. He is one of the few who truly deserves the label of hero.  He is my personal hero and yet it must be said that all he has done to become heroic is something that we all can do, should do, and must do: he has spoken the truth.  And for speaking the truth, the British Government has turned him into “An Enemy of the State”.

One would think that the constant threats made against Tommy Robinson would wake people up to the true nature and lethal character of the enemy we face. Yet even as Tommy Robinson is defamed, vilified and marginalized, he is being proven right by the events of every day – and the light of the truth he tells shines more brightly all the time.

I travelled to London and spent 2 days at the Old Bailey at his trial. Friday afternoon, the verdict came down – guilty. Britain – the land of the Magna Carta – really has no future if this is now their sense of justice. The criminals – the grooming gang rapists – are afforded all the protection as the prosecutor was only concerned that Robinson “caused distress while overlooking the appalling nature of the crimes and had the temerity of filming them at a time of high anxiety for them” when Tommy asked them how they felt about the verdict at their trial. Tommy’s expenses are now over £150,000 – while the free legal services given to the rapists and paid by the taxpayer has exceeded £1 million. The only hope is that the Government will recognize the time he has already served (in solitary confinement breaking all the rules of the Geneva Convention) and bring it to an end (this way allowing the government to save face). As well, the cost of this trial and special Police protection has also exceeded £1 million.

At this announcement, Tommy Robinson’s friends and supporters across the world were shocked and disheartened to hear that he has been, for a second time, convicted of contempt of court for filming outside a courthouse where members of a Muslim rape gang were being tried. The party-line is that he imperilled the course of justice by breaking a poorly-publicized reporting ban (which actually he had taken pains not to do).

In fact, justice in Britain has been imperilled for decades by a corrupt establishment all too willing to overlook Muslim crimes in the interest of cultural appeasement. And Robinson’s conviction has been relentlessly pursued – he already spent 10 harrowing weeks in solitary confinement – because he has become the symbol of white, working-class British anger and a convenient target for elite moralizing about the so-called “far right.” I fear that if the Crown sends him back to prison, this will be the spark that ignites a class war and will be a defining moment in British history.

This monstrous travesty of justice must be immediately appealed. There are well-grounded fears that another stint in a British prison may end in Tommy’s permanent incapacity or even death. 

We MUST help Tommy because effectively Tommy has no voice. He can’t do what he did when he had one million Facebook followers and almost one million Twitter fans. They shut him down. Tommy has been de-personned. Tommy Robinson has all but been completely silenced by the mainstream platforms following pressure from the establishment not to mention a number of other pressure groups, with his removal from Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Paypal and now YouTube in the hope that his voice is no longer heard by people who oppose the mainstream bias, the fake news perpetuation, the two-tier justice system, the mass censorship and the democratic betrayal of the Great British electorate.

Please consider donating to his legal appeal fund:

“In summation, Tommy Robinson’s QC urged the hearing not to convict his client on the basis of who he was rather than what he had done: routine for reporters across the land since time immemorial.

No journalist has been jailed, let alone to three months’ solitary since the 1940s, and many have collapsed trials receiving cursory fines — Tommy never did, commenting outside a courthouse in line with judicial guidelines, against the already convicted, and never risked doing so.

The “Reporting Restrictions” pretext is a sham to ensure the secrecy of nationwide horrors and institutional failures testified to in countless nationwide mass Muslim-implicating child rape trials.

Ask yourself why Mr Furlong pled that the judges not do the former — condemn the person based on who they were — as the judicial panel in fact did. Because they were perfectly free so to do.

This is exactly why the Magna Carta insisted on the invention of jury trials, and why too the Attorney General did his utmost to ensure a lengthy incarceration by means that would guarantee no jury would ever be empanelled.

It was the perfect fix, that no legal mind as astute as Geoffrey Cox MP’s could ever pass up.

The already un-personned Tommy Robinson, whose blood parliament had been baying for for months, would never plead guilty, and could be locked up for years, to die: with no panel of twelve Englishmen and true to ever stand in the way of the orchestrated coup de grâce.”


Tommy Robinson, Embattled Hero

The hero Tommy Robinson has been reconvicted of contempt of court, after his previous conviction was overturned and he was released from prison, but the door was left open for the attorney general to relitigate if he so chose.  He duly did, leading to Robinson’s trial at the Old Bailey on July 5. There were only two judges and no jury at Tommy’s trial at the Old Bailey.  One was Rt. Hon. Dame Victoria Sharp, DBE, president of the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court of England and Wales, the other Justice Warby, two executioners acting on behalf of the establishment.  It’s time for British citizens to tear down the Old Bailey as French citizens tore down the Bastille in Paris on July 14, 1789.


This Tommy Robinson Verdict Is a Travesty of Justice

With what might strike some observers as the most extraordinary double standards, the prosecution lawyer laid into Robinson for causing distress to the rape gang trial defendants — while pointedly overlooking the appalling nature of the crimes which had landed them in court in the first place. Caldecott the prosecutor is deeply concerned about the rapists. He just complained that Tommy had the temerity of filming them “at a time of high anxiety for them”. I haven’t heard a word from Caldecott about the high anxiety of the dozens of little girls raped by these men.

Subjective Recklessness


Attorney General Geoffrey Cox QC saw fit to bring charges against Tommy again. The first round of political persecution failed miserably, not of course without a cost. Tommy already served pretty much three months in solitary confinement and came out of prison a different man; he now needs medication to control mental health issues.

Tommy talks about those issues HERE.


The Inside Of A Solitary Confinement Cell


Verdict Tension Diffused by Tommy Robinson’s Men at Old Bailey Court


After Tommy Robinsons 2-day Trial at the Old Bailey, judges found him guilty on 3 counts, and tensions rose quickly with the police. Thanks to Danni, Kev and Richard for diffusing the situation.


In contrast, when Tommy was recently campaigning for the European Parliament, he held a perfectly legal, peaceful and family friendly election rally in Oldham. When hundreds of masked and tooled up Muslim thugs arrived (escorted there by police) and began pelting women and children with bricks and bottles, not one police baton was drawn against them in defence of these women and children. In fact, the police can clearly be seen standing around chatting amongst themselves, as missiles flew over their heads, utterly indifferent to the fact that citizens might be killed or injured. In contrast, at the Old Bailey, it only took unarmed civilians pointing and chanting, ‘Shame on you’ to have the whole line of police swiftly drawing their batons and brandishing them in a menacing way. Clearly the police are much more sensitive to their own safety than they are of the general public. Missiles thrown at families is not important enough to warrant police intervention, but pointing and chanting at the police is very frightening indeed.




I am Prepared to Die for Freedom of Speech

Tommy Robinson has been found guilty by a U.K. court for “violating a reporting ban”. Tommy joins Alex Jones to discuss the precedent now set against freedom of speech in the U.K.; his reaction to the verdict and how far he is prepared to go. This is a powerful interview and must be watched to understand the essence of Tommy Robinson.


Tommy Robinson Found Guilty!


David Wood and Robert Spencer discuss Tommy Robinson’s conviction for reporting in the UK.

Tommy Robinson Guilty with Dr. Steve Turley


Populism is fueled by a pervasive and deeply held anti-elite sentiment.  The whole world is watching now. The populist genie is out of the bottle and nothing fuels a movement like a martyr!

Tommy Tries to Explain His Corruption Charge

Lucy Manning of the BBC was not interested in what the ruling means for journalism because she works for a biased Broadcasting Corporation. One of the charges laid against Tommy was for “aggressively confronting and filming” Muslim paedophile groomers.




Remembering – July 7, 2005

Fourteen years ago, four Islamist terrorist suicide bombers with rucksacks full

of explosives attacked central London, killing 52 people and injuring hundreds

more. It was the worst single terrorist atrocity on British soil.


Language Dissidents Kicked Out Of Gov’t Symposium on Official Languages

Language Dissidents Kicked Out Of Gov’t Symposium on Official Languages



May 31, 2019 


For Immediate Release




Donna Andrew (from Shawville, QC) and Gordon Miller (from Ottawa, ON) were sent packing at registration last Monday at the above-noted Symposium marking the 50th Anniversary of the Official Languages Act (OLA).  Both were told that they had not been invited to attend the event despite the fact that both had pre-registered and were able to point to the event’s guest list which included their names.  Both people are supporters of Canadians For Language Fairness (CLF) which presumably led to their “disqualification” to enter the symposium.  


Ottawa Citizen reporter, Tom Spears, picked up the story which went viral right across the country.


Kim McConnell, President of CLF, has reported that since the article, (found in the Citizen and the Ottawa Sun of May 28), Canadians from across Canada have inundated our web site, requesting more information about the group and have sent along their best wishes for our cause.


Although so many were shocked to see this treatment given to fellow Canadians, we have seen such shenanigans before on the part of official Ottawa that demonstrates these sham get-togethers (“love fests”) are little more than OLA stakeholders coming together to pat one another on the back, while enjoying meals and refreshments at taxpayers expense.


Ms. McConnell herself was allowed into the Symposium after showing the letter from Sarah Boily (Sr. Director, Modernization of the OLA) indicating she could attend.  During the workshop she heard one speaker proudly state that over 82% of Canadians support Official Bilingualism to great applause.  In the face of this, McConnell would like to point out that even the Quebec government has designated the entire Province unilingual-French, enforced by its own language police.  Outside the province of Quebec support is meager at best.  


Why not put the question to the Canadian people outside of Quebec in a Referendum and see how popular the program really is?  

Canadians for Language Fairness was incorporated in 2004 with its Mandate to educate the public on how the Official Languages Act and its amendments down through the years, severely discriminates against the vast majority of Canadians.

Canadians for Language Fairness Inc.

Board of Directors

We Need an International Day Against Heterophobia and Europhobia

We Need an International Day Against Heterophobia and Europhobia



Ex-IKEA employee sues company for firing over posting Bible verses on homosexuality

Sun 07 Jul 2019

By Eno Adeogun

IKEA is being sued by a former Catholic employee after he was sacked for posting Bible verses on the company’s corporate network that demonstrated his objection to the company’s promotion of “LGBT rights”.

Tomasz K – who worked at an IEKA store in Poland, told state broadcaster TVP Info that he was fired after he refused to delete a comment on the retailer’s intranet.

The company celebrated International Day Against Homophobia, Biphobia and Transphobia (IDAHOT) in May and put up a post asking employees to attend a pro-LGBT event.


“I was shaken up, I’ve been hired to sell furniture but I’m a Catholic and these aren’t my values,” Tomasz explained.

He replied to the post expressing his traditional biblical views on sexuality and was fired as a result.

In a statement released by IKEA, the company said: “One of our employees published a comment under the article, expressing his opinion in a way that could affect the rights and dignity of LGBT + persons.

“In addition, the employee actually used quotes from the Old Testament about death, blood in the context of what fate should meet homosexual people.”

They added that many fellow employees contacted IKEA human resources about Tomasz’s post.

Tomasz is being helped by lawyers from the conservative legal organization Ordo Iuris Institute. They are argue that his right to express his beliefs in an open forum has been violated.

All Aboard with Transgender Ideology

All Aboard with Transgender Ideology


 BC Ferries—steering a course set by the transgender lobby and its political agents

On Thursday night I attended a Campbell River meeting of the Freedom Defence Council, a growing grass roots made-in-Vancouver Island group of some 200 social conservatives.. The meeting was intense, informative and geared for action. The discussion moved from the broader picture—the demolition of our Christian heritage and culture and the war on free speech —to the immediate threat posed by the aggressively imperialistic transgender lobby, insatiable in its appetite for more public spaces to occupy.

Specifically, it was about the alarming imposition of LGTBQ posters and banners and flags on city owned facilities, and the implementation of a trans-friendly curriculum in schools.  To give you a measure of these conquests,   on Pride Day, the public library even hosted a Drag Queen Folk Tales event for children! Lesbian sex toys were  on full display at a nearby waterside public park—with  children in close proximity! Dolls are apparently passé. Dildos are the rage now.

The conclusion is inescapable.  Children are being sexualized with few ‘safe’ spaces to find refuge.  One powerful lobby group has claimed the public space.  Their message:  Move over or go home—and shut up.  The media and the politicians are on our side and the BC Human Rights Tribunal stands behind us.

Hmm.  This sounds pretty alarmist. Are things really that bad? Are the barbarians really at the gates, or inside them?  The answer came soon.

When I took the returning ferry to Quadra Island, I noticed that the ship was flying the rainbow Pride flag,  17 days after Pride Day! This is on  a taxpayer subsidised ship! Which made me think that it would be appropriate if the BC Ferries Corp. was renamed the” BC Fairies Corp”.  Should that change transpire, I may one day feel compelled to do something I would never have dreamed of doing.  I may have to run to catch a fairy. But I will be damned if I’m ever made to ride one! I’d rather swim.

If the BC Ferries Corp was indeed to become the BC Fairies Corp maybe the CEO should be replaced in favour of a Rear Admiral, eg. Svend Robinson. After all, every vessel in the fleet can unload at either end, although docking can be problematic at times.   Since most ships are referred to as “she”, as in “there she blows”, it is certain that this sexist practice will be soon come to an end when our progressive provincial NDP-Green government realizes that the fate of the nation depends on its immediate termination.  Every ship must eventually be referred to using a non-binary pronoun, or maybe a traditional pronoun with a gay male connotation, as in “there he blows”.

 Perhaps BC Fairies vessels could be gender fluid. They could leave one terminal as a ‘she’, and arrive at the destination terminal as a ‘he’, depending on the fluctuating mood of the non-binary captain who was hired to meet the new quota targets. “ The Queen of New Westminster” could leave the Tsawassen terminal at 11 am and be received 90 minutes later in Swartz Bay as “The King of New Westminster”.  Alternatively, the vessel could simply be called the “Drag Queen of New Westminster”, a venue for reading Queer Folk Tales to children with or without parental approval or supervision. Tsawassen-to-Swartz Bay and back could then become a world class trans-portation route.

 If the vessel should collide with another, take on water and begin to sink, the “women and children first” protocol would have to be changed to a “gender dysphoric children and gender fluid mothers first” rule. Biological male passengers eager to claim a seat on a lifeboat would not need to offer proof that they are actually women–they need only declare that they presently ‘identify’ as a woman. Any ship officer or crew who would challenge such an assertion would be subject to immediate dismissal and a BC Human Rights complaint adjudicated by political hacks.  To hammer that point home, vessels would be re-christened to honour the contributions of trans activists who have contributed so much to our progressive and tolerant society, especially in the area of free speech. How does “MTV Morgane Oger” sound? It would be designated as the Mother Ship of the fleet, but It wouldn’t need a wide berth owing to the fact that it can’t give birth.

Seriously, as one speaker at the meeting said, “Things are moving so fast that if we don’t soon get off our butts, organize and ACT now, it will be game over….for one thing, we need the ability to call upon a quick response group to counteract Antifa and LGBT bully groups who show up to shout us down…..of those in our congregations who feel as strongly as we do, many feel too intimidated to stand up to them……as a result, our children are being abducted by this evil cult, made ever more powerful by the ardent support it receives from local council, the provincial government, and the local media…. (words to that effect).

The issue here is not just about free speech, but the flagrant transgression of the formerly respected boundary between ideology and state.  The former is the privilege of the elected custodians of the state, and the latter is, or should be, a neutral instrument employed impartially for the benefit of all taxpayers regardless of their political orientation.  In an authentically democratic nation, civil servants, public sector employees and the institutions they work in should be politically neutral.  In Canada, neither the RCMP, nor a City Hall, nor a public school, nor a public library, nor a publicly subsidized ferry—to cite a few examples—should dare display a political message that promotes a given ideology no matter how many citizens there are who may ascribe to it.  That’s basic Canadian Civics 101.

But in the emerging soft totalitarian society, the Party that controls the state, feels little compunction in using public resources to propagate a partisan line and commandeering  state property for use as a platform for that same purpose.  In this case, they frame their shameless display of rainbow flags and posters as an acknowledgement and celebration of the ‘diversity’ that exists in our society. But they celebrate cultural or sexual ‘diversity’  to the utter neglect of the ideological diversity that is as much a reality in the community as anything else.  The Left is keen on the diversity of people, but not on the diversity of ideas.  They are all for “inclusion”, but their inclusion is not inclusive of ideas and views they detest.

 They assume that all taxpayers are on the same page. They pretend that Christians and social conservatives do not exist, or if they do, are too marginal and too out of sync with the times to warrant consideration. In their eyes, conservative thought or expression is an atavism that needs to be suppressed, silenced and ignored, until its aged proponents  pass into the dustbin of history. The implication is clear.  Bigots pay taxes, but they do not deserve representation—or an audience for that matter. Consequently, our entreaties and LTEs are ignored.

 Soon, it seems, the rainbow flag will be a permanent feature of every flag pole every day of every week in the calendar. The most worrisome part of this story is, as a few speakers pointed out, the active dissidents are predominantly male, white and over 60, and the pastors are too timid and ostrich-like to lead them or rally younger parishioners to the cause.  They choose to ignore the fact that if the bullies continue to have their way,  ten years hence their churches may be on life support. If that.  The window is rapidly closing and having feasted on blood,  the sharks are circling ever closer. We need the younger generation to step up and pick up the torch. That was the consensus.

Tim Murray