French Intellectual Sentenced to 2 Months in Prison For Calling Mass Immigration an “Invasion”
[Free speech in France? Forget about it! The “liberte”, part of the slogan of the French Revolution has been replaced by state censorship and laws promoted by anti-White and anti-free speech minorities. France’s current “hate law”, the Fabius-Gayssot Law of 1990, was named after its two sponsors, Laurent Fabius, a socialist Jew and member of the National Assembly, and Jean-Claude Gayssot, a Communist Party deputy.]
Forced to pay 1800 euros to anti-racism organizations for his crime of opinion.
French intellectual Renaud Camus has been given a 2
month suspended prison sentence for saying that mass immigration into
Europe represents an “invasion.”
Camus will only avoid
jail by paying 1800 euros to two “anti-racist” organizations, SOS
Racisme and the LICRA (International League against Racism and
Anti-Semitism).
The writer, who is the author of Le Grand
Remplacement (The Great Replacement), was charged with “public
incitement to hate or violence on the basis of origin, ethnicity,
nationality, race or religion.”
The
conviction stems from a November 2017 speech in Colombey-les-deux
Eglises to the National Council of European Resistance in which Camus
declared, “Immigration has become an invasion.”
“The irreversible colonization is demographic colonization, by
the replacement of the population,” said the author, adding, “The ethnic
substitution, the great replacement, is the most important event in the
history of our nation since it has existed; as with other people, if
the story continues, it will not be that of France.”
Camus also called for a “national consensus of resistance” to
oppose Islamization in “the struggle for the salvation of our common
civilization, Celtic, Slavic, Germanic, Greek-Latin, Judeo-Christian.”
The part of Camus’ speech that specifically garnered the
attention of judges was when he talked about European people being
replaced.
Camus said mass immigration “is the substitution, the tendency to
substitute everything with its emulator, normalized, standardized,
interchangeable: The original with its copy, the authentic with its
imitation, the true with the false, the mothers with surrogate mothers,
the culture with free time and entertainment.”
France suffers Islamic terror attacks on such a routine basis
that it’s barely even an important news story anymore. Many of those
terrorists are radicalized by mosques that escape any police scrutiny,
but Camus must be punished for his crime of opinion.
And there you have it. Free speech is now a crime in France.
I spent a few hours putting together a comprehensive list of all 338 Canadian Members of Parliament E-mail addresses, as well as over 100 Senators (the house of sober second thought), and sent them the following open letter on 2020 January 16. For background to this story, please see my last article from September 2019 here, and within that article are links to earlier articles about this Orwellian saga.
RE: Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) theft of privately owned books at Calgary Airport
Background:
On 24 April 2019 upon my return from the USA to Calgary airport, five books were seized / stolen from me by the Canada Border Services Agency. I had been flagged, and was harassed and detained for three hours.
I wrote three letters, May 3rd, July 2nd, August 12th, 2019 plus an appeal October 18, 2019 to the CBSA, in an effort to get my books back.
Two out of five books were returned to me, and the others were deemed to constitute “hate propaganda”, prohibited under Customs tariff item 9899.00.00 pursuant to section 58 of the Customs Act.
The 3 books which are still in the possession of the CBSA are:
The Commission by Richard Barrett
The Great Impersonation – The Mask of Edom by Pastor Eli James
Mystery Babylon: New World Unveiled Vol. 1 by Eli James and Clay Douglas
The explanatory form that was sent to me had the following boxes checked off, indicating what the so-called “offence” was:
Alleging that an identifiable group:
is to blame for serious economic or social problems
manipulates media/trade/finance/politics/government to the detriment of society
is inferior/superior
weakens or threatens society
There was no indication that it mattered or not whether these forbidden allegations were grounded in truth. Truth is not relevant here. It only matters that certain things (the Truth?) are not allowed to be said or read.
Ultimately I was supposed to PROVE that the stolen books were NOT “hate” by providing evidence that they were not hate. The absurdity of the entire debacle reached a level not possible in a sane society. Allow me to quote from my third letter to the CBSA dated August 12, 2019.
First, the deadline for rebuttal is impossible to meet. Your letter, dated July 16, 2019, took 9 days to reach me.[…] Your letter stipulated that you must receive, by mail, my evidence and arguments within 14 days of the date on your letter[…]. If my letter took as long to reach you as yours to reach me, it would already have been too late, and would have allowed a negative amount of time for me to, in your words, ‘submit evidence, regarding the admissibility of the material […]’.
The more serious matter is that the onus of proof is reversed. You say I should provide evidence that these books do not constitute “hate propaganda”. If something does not exist, it is a moot point to prove it does not exist. If it does exist, then the person alleging that it exists should prove that it exists. The onus MUST be on the accuser to prove their accusation. Your logic is false.
The next flaw in your case against me is that you have stolen the evidence! You have taken away […] the books that you deemed offensive. How am I supposed to gather and submit evidence regarding the “admissibility of the material” when you have taken the allegedly-offensive books away from me???
I have not read the books. I do not have copies of these books in my possession. You seized them. Explain to me how I am to gather evidence about an object that you have stolen from me. Would these books not be the very source of “evidence” with which I am supposed to prove that they are NOT something that you allege they are?
As any logical-thinking man or woman can see, it is an impossible situation. It is as sensible as breaking both legs of a runner and then telling him to go win that race. Would that be a fair race? Or is the outcome pre-determined.
I could avail myself of what appears to be the only option remaining, that of litigation against the CBSA. However, it is not worth my time and resources to participate in this game, a totally rigged system, to get my books back. I do not wish to feed the proverbial beast.
It would of course only be done on principle, as the books are worth far less money than the time and resources it would cost to litigate. As for winning, truth and righteousness are on my side, but the entire so-called justice system is so corrupted that my chances of success are about as good as the runner with the two broken legs winning his race.
The Canada Border Services Agency is de facto an arm of the government. It is at best a sign of moral and ethical bankruptcy and at worst it is treachery and treason for you, as so-called government representatives, to engage in such tyranny against the people who you are supposed to be serving. The government no longer serves the people, but is serving an enemy within.
It is interesting to note that the Talmud has not been stipulated as “hate propaganda”, yet this Jewish holy book calls the Gentiles cattle and calls for our total enslavement. This double standard on which books are “permitted”, demonstrates who you are really serving. Your “Act” which prohibits certain books (and thoughts and spoken words) is a modern day book burning.
I challenge every and any one of you government representatives to rectify this situation. Get rid of the “thought and speech laws”. Have my stolen books returned to me.
In the meantime, I can and have replaced the books through other channels. I am sovereign of my domain and can decide what I can and want to read or not.
I am compelled to publicize widely, this Orwellian act of treachery by an agency which represents Canada at our borders. We truly are living in interesting times.
WE THE PEOPLE ASK THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO TAKE OR EXPLAIN A POSITION ON AN ISSUE OR POLICY
Charge West Virginia’s governor Jim Justice with illegal interference with our “White Self-hatred is Sick” billboard
The office of West Virginia’s governor Jim Justice responded to a
complaint against our billboard “White self-hatred is sick” by
persuading the billboard’s owner to remove the message. (goo.gl/8pUz6o,
goo.gl/bkVLTC).
We bring this discriminatory act to the attention of President Trump
since the president has decried political correctness that denies free
speech.
We respectfully request these actions:
1. Urge Governor Justice to restore our billboard or provide one similarly located.
2. If Governor Justice fails to do the above in a timely manner, bring
Federal charges against him for having violated the civil rights of the
renter(s) of the billboard by interfering with their free speech.
Thank you very much,
Coalition for Propagation of the Message “White Self-Hatred is Sick”
Trump passes the word to Gov. Justice: “White self-hatred is SICK!!!”
Ian Verner MacDonald is one of the few remaining RCAF vets from WW II. A former diplomat, writer, publisher, businessman & lifelong historical Truth Seeker, Ian turns 95 January 19. He is an immigration critic and ferocious friend of freedom of speech. CAFE honored him in 2010 with its first “Free Speech Award.”
So, You Think Norway is Part of the “Free World”: Moslems Invade but “Security” Police Arrest & Deport White Nationalist Author
The American pro-white nationalist Greg Johnson has been arrested in Oslo, where he was presenting at a conference organized by the network Scandza forum.
The American All Right profile Greg Johnson.
The American nationalist and alt-right profile Greg Johnson has been arrested by the Norwegian security police PST with reference to the Aliens Act.
Johnson was in Oslo to lecture at the international conference Scandza forum when he was arrested.
PST’s press spokesman Martin Bernsen tells NRK that Johnson has been arrested and expelled because of the political opinions he expressed.
– He can play an obvious radicalization role. He will be dispatched from Norway as soon as possible, says Bernsen.
PST accuses Johnson of supporting political violence and of defending Anders Behring Breivik’s terrorist act in 2011.
Johnson himself denies this in a written statement and says that PST has taken what he has written about Breivik out of context.
The conference organizer Frode Midjord also distances himself from violence.
– Right-wing extremism means violence as a method, and we are far from that. We want a political debate, Midjord tells NRK.
Outside the conference room where Scandza’s forum was held in Oslo, a large number of left-wing counter-protesters had gathered.
The situation turned violent when the left-wing extremists broke the police’s barricades to try to get into the conference room. 25 counter-protesters were arrested for disorderly order.
Greg Johnson describes himself as a racially conscious nationalist and advocates a white ethnostat. He opposes immigration and multiculturalism and is often accused of being anti-Semitic.
Johnson is a Ph.D. in philosophy, he has published over 40 books and since 2010 has been editor-in-chief of the nationalist publisher Counter-Currents Publishing.
Some time ago it was revealed that the gay Greg Johnson is part of a gay network within the alt-right sphere in the United States.
INTERVIEW. A refugee
centre next to the school. Teachers fired for standing up for freedom of
opinion. A majority of foreign pupils. What is life like at a Swedish
high school? Nordfront interviews Filip from Gothenburg to find out.
Stock photo. Photo: Holger.Ellgaard (CC BY 4.0.)
In the middle of the Christmas festivities, a friendly high school
pupil from Gothenburg takes time out of his holidays to meet for an
interview.
“I’m a completely normal guy who likes books about subjects that
aren’t always on the curriculum,” says Filip when he is asked to
describe himself.
Filip is passionate about justice, the truth and morality. This
becomes clear when he explains why he took a liking to these books. How
did you develop this interest?
Social studies and history class started it all. Feminism and WWII
sped up my interest in forming my own opinion about things because the
lessons felt very left-wing-orientated. School left out a lot of
information they didn’t want us knowing about.
Opinions cause complications
This interest has led to certain complications. Filip began his high
school education at a school in Gothenburg where he was one of a dozen
Swedes among 500 pupils. It was impossible to study in peace so he
changed schools. Today he attends a school south of Gothenburg. He
studies social and behavioural sciences.
“Originally I wanted to be a policeman, but I’ve changed my mind
after having seen how the police treat dissidents like me and my
friends.”
It’s clear pupils can’t hold whatever opinions they want to,
especially not when they contradict the school’s core values. That’s
when it gets complicated. What are your political views?
“I am openly National Socialist,” answers Filip proudly and says that
he almost exclusively socialises with nationalists and preferably
National Socialists. “There have been some discussions with the head
teacher and SÄPO [the Swedish secret police] on account of my views.”
Thinking what you want in school is not allowed, not even for teachers.
“There was a teacher who was good, but he was fired for standing up for freedom of opinion.”
A majority of foreigners
Filip thinks the school he goes to today is somewhat better than his
last one, but Swedes are still in a minority. How are things with the
foreign pupils at the school?
“There are loads of f–king foreigners. The majority are foreigners.
Grown men pretending to be children. There is a refugee centre right
next to the school.
“My class is one of those with the most Swedes, but the foreigners create loads of problems.”
The environment in the classroom seems to be chaotic, to say the
least. It isn’t surprising that school performance is plummeting. What’s
it like during breaks?
“It’s very noisy and loud. There are hardly any places where you can
have a quiet moment. The feminists and foreigners shout and scream. The
feminists are probably the worst. They are always discussing sexuality
and gender issues. They scream, ‘Rapist!’ at all the Swedish boys who
aren’t feminists, but they’re also careful to avoid being called
racists.”
The knifeman
Filip describes his school as generally similar to most other schools.
“The schools vary a little depending on where you live, and the
topics of conversation can become more sensitive depending on the
school’s demography.”
Filip comes across as mature for his age and expresses himself very
well, using words that are quite uncommon at high school. But one or two
expletives still slip through. Have there been any notable incidents
worth mentioning?
“There was a dispute during a lunch break when foreigners called one
of my friends a whore and threatened to f–k her mother. They were asked
to leave the area, but they came back a few hours later with an older,
very big immigrant who was armed with knuckledusters and a knife. His
intention was clear: he wanted to kill us. By chance, a teacher managed
to avert the incident and call the police.”
The incident happened in the school’s corridors. The teacher who
fortunately came to the rescue escaped with just a couple of violent
shoves. What are the teachers like at the school?
“They are good at teaching the system’s programme. Most of them are
wimps and do everything they can to avoid being called racists. When
it’s noisy during class, they say, ‘Stoppp it’,” Filip says in a wimpy
voice, mimicking his teachers.
He says sometimes extra teachers are brought in, but that rarely helps. Do the teachers have any apparent political affiliation?
“Definitely!” he answers quickly. “Several teachers say things like,
‘The Sweden Democrats are real Nazis. I’m voting for Feminist
Initiative!’”
And if they’re questioned, how do they react?
“They go into defence mode. They can’t justify it, but they still express their personal opinions in school.”
Gang rape
What are things like for the girls at school?
“Swedish girls are continually harassed and even groped. But the head
teacher doesn’t care. They are called all the usual things like whore,
c–t and bitch, but also sharmota and other Arabic names.”
He doesn’t know if anyone has been raped at the school yet but says
he has a relative who was gang raped. Have you helped anyone who has
been assaulted?
“Yes! Me and my friends have helped girls in the town who were harassed by immigrants.”
How did you become interested in politics?
“When I was younger, I was probably more of an ordinary racist, but
after understanding the Jewish question, I became NS. I realised that
immigration and immigrants are a symptom of a bigger problem.”
Strike back!
To conclude this interview, is there anything you’d like to say to young people in schools around Sweden?
“We Swedes have kept silent for far too long, and that is why we have the problems we do. A fitting message might be: Swedish youth, strike back!”
Nordfront thanks Filip for his participation in this
interview and hopes his words can inspire more people to start doing
something to improve the situation for our schoolchildren.
(Picture
left) The “hate crime” for which I am now slated to go on trial for
this coming June 2020. Handing out 3500 zombie safe sex packages AKA
known as life saving Gospel literature to naked sodomites and others at
the 2016 Toronto homosexual pride parade. (Picture right) Bill Whatcott
poses with two Toronto police officers while taking a break from handing
out zombie safe sex packages at the unGodly pride parade.
Dear Friends,
Yesterday was my last day of court before my trial,
The
Crown Prosecutor tried to argue quite forcefully that I had a “deep and
complex hatred of homosexuals.” Multiple times during the hearing the
prosecutor reiterated “Whatcott hates homosexuals” and at least once the
Prosecutor asserted I have an “intense and ongoing hatred of
homosexuals.”
For proof of this alleged intense (apparently
selectively criminalized) emotion that I am carrying with me the
Prosecutor wants to introduce social media posts and flyers that I have
penned over the decades into evidence where they can pull words like
“sodomite,” “freak,” and “homofascist” out of the paragraphs to
establish my alleged hatred of homosexuals.
The
Crown Prosecutor pulled the word “freak” out of a January 2019 post on
this site where I referred to this guy walking around with a pride flag
stuck out of his bum as a “freak.” Here is the post the Prosecutor cited
as evidence of my “hatred of homosexuals:” viewtopic.php?f=16&t=10744&p=26366&hilit=pride+flag+bum#p26366
When
you engage in behaviour worthy of ridicule what am I supposed to call
you? In my world if you run around naked with a pride flag sticking out
of your bum you are a freak…… For a Prosecutor to use my reality
based assessment of a homosexual’s highly public behaviour as evidence
of criminal intent worthy of 18 months incarceration is highly
disturbing and I wonder when Canadians will wake up and forcefully
demand their God given right to speak sanely once again?
While
the word “sodomite” is a behaviour based word that is pejorative in the
Bible, so are the words “adulturer,” “thieves,” and “sorcerers”
pejorative in the Bible. In my circle of friends I have people who have
stolen, who have committed adultery, and who have engaged in homosexual
acts. In Canadian law we can quite correctly seperate acts of adultery
and stealing from a person’s innate genetic make up. We know people may
experience seemingly irresistable urges to steal or sleep with someone’s
spouse, but we also know that people are morally responsible when they
commit this behaviour and that people who engage in this behaviour will
often change, especially when they seek moral guidance and desire to
change these unhealthy behaviours in their lives. Sadly, with homosexual
behaviour there is a huge disconnect with reality and it seems time
tested rules that apply to other sexual behaviours are hysterically
attacked and in some cases even criminalized when they are applied to
homosexual behaviour. Truthfully critiquing homosexual behaviour and
pointing out its harm is now simply called “hate” and is banned.
Of
course Christians condemn stealing, but don’t hate people who steal and
we will always condemn sodomy (even though the Prosecutor doesn’t like
me saying it, sodomy does have significant economic and social costs
that are being born by all Canadians) but that does not mean we hate
sodomites. In fact we know thieves and sodomites (and all other sinners)
can change.
“Or
do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of
God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters,
nor adulterers, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor
drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you
were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit
of our God.“ 1 Corinthians 6:9-11
But heck now
Bill S202 has passed first reading and it seems to me the homosexual
activist media is pushing this bill with complete garbage stories of
multitudes of homosexuals committing suicide after being told by some
evil and crazy Christian therapist that they can change their sexual
behaviour if they are motivated to do so, and now our homosexual
activist Prime Minister is supporting the bill which will make such
Christian counselling an indictable offense punishable by up to five
years in prison.
And yet the Prosecutor pulled the word
“homofascist” out of my writings and acted like this particular word is a
made up delusion and more evidence of my “intense and ongoing hatred of
homosexuals.”
Is it possible that this word might actually apply
when referring to Canadian politicians and LGBT activists who want to
see Christian counsellors put in prison for 5 years or Christian
activists jailed for 18 months who hand out “zombie safe sex” packages
on the streets of Toronto during “Pride” month?
Please pray for truth and true justice to prevail in this hate crime case.
It
looks like my trial is definitely going forward for June 2019. The
trial will last a month and I will need to be in Toronto for two weeks
before the trial begins to work with my lawyer.
No money is
needed for legal expenses as that is covered by legal aid now, but I
will need some donations to survive for the 6 weeks that I will be
forced to reside in Toronto for my trial.
At this point in time there is no news on my appeal in Whatcott vs Oger
where I (as predicted) lost in the British Columbia Human Rights
Tribunal (BCHRT) the case that Mr. Ronan Oger prosecuted me for saying
he was a man and that God did not want Vancouver-False Creek residents
to vote for him during the last provincial election. The penalty for
refusing to call him a woman during my hearing and for participating in
the provincial election by advancing a reality based perspective, based
on an orthodox Christian perspective, was a whopping $55,000 fine.
No news yet on when my trial date is coming in the Jonathan Yaniv vs Whatcott
case either. In this case Mr. Yaniv is seeking over $35,000 in
compensation from me because I refered to him as a man and criticized
his prosecution of 16 female estheticians who he dragged to the BCHRT
for refusing to wax his balls.
As Canada moves further away from
the God who created us and who desires Lordship over our lives, it seems
we are inventing ever stranger notions of what justice and human rights
looks like. Please pray for God to deliver Canada from this darkness
that is gripping our land and that He will have mercy and heal this land
so that we can have leaders capable of discerning real justice and
pray the Canadian people will see their need to repent and turn to the
Living God so they can be reconciled with their Lord and the Saviour of
their souls once again.
“If
my people who are called by my name humble themselves, and pray and
seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from
heaven and will forgive their sin and heal their land.“ 2 Chronicles 7:14
Jim and Diane Present LADY MICHELE RENOUF JAILING THE LAWYER by Horst Mahler Other Political Prisoners Sylvia Stolz, Ursula Haverbeck, Alfred Schaefer Dec 7, 2019
Jim and Diane Present
LADY MICHELE RENOUF
JAILING THE LAWYER
by Horst Mahler
Other Political Prisoners Sylvia Stolz, Ursula Haverbeck, Alfred Schaefer
Dec 7, 2019 https://www.bitchute.com/video/khVEFb2JLIZV/
FROM LADY MICHELE RENOUF to JIM AND DIANE, Dec 7, 2019
It
occurs to me that while both Horst Mahler and Sylvia Stolz are
currently in prison, this old film I made called “Jailing the Lawyers”
has ongoing currency and evermore pressing relevance for public
awareness of the plight of attorneys and even judges who must ignore
normal courtroom practice or face long jail terms. Horst describes the
situation for attorneys and the little known legal achievement of
Attorney Stolz.
This
unique interview with Horst took place in Sylvia’s home during the
period of her earlier three years of incarceration for defending Ernst
Zündel “too well”. Since then, she has been returned to jail for her
speech in Switzerland which concerned only a recounting of her prison
sentences; while Horst who has severe diabetes has had both legs
amputated yet must remain behind bars possibly for the remainder of his
life for the “crime” of expressing his peaceful philosophical opinions and for defending his clients “too well”:
There are two other films I have made concerning Horst Mahler:
1.
About the demonstration against Horst’s imprisonment in Brandenburg
where Ursula Haverbeck and the attorney Wolfram Nahrath address the
March.
2.
The other is a further interview in a Munich restaurant during the
brief period when Horst was not behind bars. He speaks about
spirituality.
I
am uploading these on Bitchute and will send you the urls in case you
might like to release all three. Rather important that these two
veteran attorneys and their grotesque plights are brought to the
attention of the public.
I believe you both will enjoy, as well, his opinions on National Socialism!
Cheers, Michèle
GERMAN POLITICAL PRISONERS
WRITE TO SYLVIA STOLZ at the following address:
Sylvia Stolz
Münchener Str. 33
86551 Aichach Germany
Write to Ursula Haverbeck at the following address:
by Lawrence Blanchard, ND, M.Div. Did you see the two stories that appeared recently about a law student and law professor who challenged the tolerance and diversity program in America? The challenge exposed the glaring hypocritical exception of the high and mighty advocates pushing tolerance and diversity down our collective throats. “Truth be damned” should be their motto. The first story was about a law student at the Oklahoma City University of Law who “left some flyers”1 around the school with the phrase, “It’s Okay to Be White.”
The law school dean went ballistic, promising an “intentional and relentless” promotion of diversity to counter such a notion. Police were called to investigate to see if “the flyers” and this “person’s actions amounted to a hate crime. They wanted to make sure this student was “not a threat to other students.”
“The OCU police department reportedly partnered with the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force to locate and interrogate the student activist.” 1
