“Britain is sliding into the oldest trap in the book – and the government is laying the bait. Across towns and cities, ordinary people protesting the collapse of their communities are being met not just by police lines but by choreographed mobs of left-wing activists, bussed in under banners like Stand Up to Racism. This isn’t spontaneous counter-protest. It’s state-sanctioned provocation.
The pattern is clear. Locals rally outside migrant hotels to demand their closure. Counter-demonstrators, backed by NGOs and shielded by police, descend to brand them “racist.” The two sides clash. Cameras roll. The headlines write themselves: far-right violence, public order crisis, threat to democracy. Suddenly, the story isn’t the government’s betrayal over immigration – it’s the need for more powers, more crackdowns, more control.
This is how you turn legitimate dissent into criminality. By baiting it, inflaming it, and then using it as the pretext for repression. The government doesn’t fear the leftist mobs because those mobs serve their purpose. They fear the ordinary British majority that is waking up to the reality of demographic change, cultural erosion, and the slow replacement of their birthright. That majority must be discredited and contained – and street clashes give the state exactly the excuse it needs.
Make no mistake: none of this is accidental. A government that wanted peace would listen to the people, end the hotel racket, and restore order by defending the border. Instead, it manufactures conflict at home while waving more arrivals through abroad. The goal isn’t resolution. It’s escalation – so they can claim extraordinary powers while painting patriots as extremists.
The riots aren’t the breakdown of the system; they are the system.
“Counter-demonstrators, backed by NGOs and shielded by police, descend to brand them “racist.””
Federal court rules for pro-lifers fighting ordinance to block sidewalk counselors
A federal court in New York awarded pro-life sidewalk counselors a significant victory, ruling that their constitutional rights were violated by a county law aimed at silencing pro-lifers outside abortion facilities.
Key Takeaways:
A federal court ruled that an ordinance in Westchester County, New York, which attempted to silence pro-life speech, was unconstitutional.
The plaintiffs, who had asked for only nominal damages, were awarded $1.
Attorneys plan to challenge another portion of the ordinance, which prohibits “following and harassing.”
The Details:
In an August 12 ruling, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled in favor of Oksana Hulinsky and Regina Molinelli, two pro-lifers who were unable to provide sidewalk counseling outside abortion facilities in Westchester County for several years due to a county ordinance which restricted pro-life activity near abortion businesses.
Represented by the Thomas More Society, the duo filed their lawsuit, Hulinsky v. County of Westchester, in 2022, claiming that the county’s law prohibiting “interference” outside abortion facilities was unconstitutional. As Thomas More Society reports, the ordinance “imposed a litany of severe restrictions on speech and assembly near abortion facilities, intending to restrict pro-life sidewalk counseling ministries in public spaces.” The law firm notes that “the county has since repealed or amended a number of those provisions in response to the Thomas More Society lawsuit.”
In its ruling, the Court agreed that the county’s actions in which it “criminalized large swaths of protected speech” were unconstitutional. Because the plaintiffs were seeking “nominal damages” in the case, the court awarded them $1.
Though the ruling is considered a victory, Thomas More Society said that it intends to appeal a prior court’s ruling that upheld a provision on “following and harassing,” noting that “the law vaguely defines [this] as ignoring an ‘implied request to cease’ on a public sidewalk.”
The Bottom Line:
“This ruling sends a powerful message to municipalities nationwide: vague laws targeting pro-life speech will not stand,” said Christopher Ferrara, Senior Counsel at the Thomas More Society.
“Westchester County’s pro-life sidewalk counselors seek only to offer compassionate, life-affirming alternatives on public sidewalks—as is their First Amendment right. Westchester’s arrogant overreach tried to silence their voices, but this decision helps reaffirm their constitutional freedom to share the pro-life message.”
Follow Live Action News on Facebook and Instagram for more pro-life news.
Whatcott rejected by Alberta Human Rights Commission, Bike Edmonton, and even the occasional Christian, but accepted at Sean Feucht Concert
Dear Friends,
Yesterday was a profound day. I headed to Edmonton and went to the Sean Feucht revival at the legislature grounds in downtown Edmonton.
This picture above is my favourite picture that I took at the concert/revival.
Me with my sign. Behind me is Sean Feucht on the stage singing Gospel music and delivering his message of revival and standing for Christ in a sometimes hostile culture.
Towards the end of the revival a friend who I met at the concert took my sign to hold it up after I got tired and sat down.
Towards the end Sean Feucht lead a communion service. To my surprise he referred to Holy Communion as a sacrament, rather than merely an ordinance. On this point I agree with Sean Feucht. It is clear to me in Scripture that God instituted Holy Communion and it is more than merely an ordinance. Holy Communion has sacramental qualities.
“For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when He was betrayed took bread, and when He had given thanks, He broke it, and said, “This is my body, which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.”In the same way also He took the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes.
Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup.For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment on himself. ” 1 Corinthians 11:23-29
After communion there was an altar call. The altar experience for me was surreal. Notwithstanding my smile in the above pictures, this past week I have been going through some emotional pain. I don’t believe men should be overly emotional/feminine, crying over every slight or disappointment. I have had some big losses recently, but was keeping things together when I went forward. While not the theme, Sean Feucht did mention in passing that God heals rejection and I was pondering that in regards to my past week experiences while at the altar. While pondering and hurting over this week’s events, a man who was a friend of mine for years, but ghosted me 3 years ago after a family member of his and one of his friends took advantage of me for thousands of dollars. This man walked by me and after praying for someone beside me, decided to pray over me.
The combination of my recent pain and then having this guy lay his hands on me was too much. I broke down as the inner pain was too severe. I don’t think the fellow knew what to do. He hugged me for a moment and then said “God bless you” and quickly moved on. I didn’t feel like being a spectacle at the altar so I composed myself and headed back into the crowd. The attendance appeared to be at least a couple thousand people at the concert, so it was easy to blend in the crowd.
Anyways, I also got the news below this week. No surprise. Alberta’s bureaucracy is almost as badly effected with homosexual activism and anti-Christian antipathy as any other province. Daniel Smith supports homosexual marriage and homosexual rights. She is also more tolerant of Christians, as evidenced by her government’s refusal to cancel Sean Feucht. But bureacracies like the Alberta Human Rights Commission (AHRC) are operating much as they did under Rachel Notley’s NDP government and the agenda of the AHRC is no different than the agenda of the Ontario Human Rights Commission or the British Columbia Human Rights Commission.
Anyways, for those not familiar with the complaint here is the video of Bike Edmonton kicking me out of their store. This is about as discriminatory and fitting of what a Human Rights Commission would allegedly deal with as it gets.
As believers who follow Jesus and who are called to defend God’s definition of marriage and sexuality, I would encourage you to not be surprised or disheartened when you experience double standards and mistreatment. Even when it is one of your “conservative” government agencies doing it. Such was the case for those who followed Christ before us.
“Others suffered mocking and flogging, and even chains and imprisonment. They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were killed with the sword. They went about in skins of sheep and goats, destitute, afflicted, mistreated—of whom the world was not worthy—wandering about in deserts and mountains, and in dens and caves of the earth.
And all these, though commended through their faith, did not receive what was promised, since God had provided something better for us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect.” Hebrews 11:36-40
Footage obtained by Noticer News shows Mr Sewell, the leader of political organisation White Australia, being handcuffed at his in-laws’ home on Friday morning after police threatened to break a glass door down with a battering ram.
After first telling Mr Sewell that he wasn’t being charged and was only being asked to attend a voluntary interview over an alleged affray and assault, officers said he would be arrested if he did not come outside, and that they “didn’t need” signed documents to take him into custody.
https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?
“Look what you’re doing to my family – you know I haven’t committed a crime,” Mr Sewell told the officers, who did not have their body worn cameras attached, after opening the door.
“You have no legal right to be here, you’re trespassing on this property.”
One of the officers said “Thomas you need to come with us”, and when Mr Sewell asked if he was under arrest, the officer then said “yes, you are”.
“There we go, we’re under arrest, you didn’t say that before, did you?” Mr Sewell replied.
“I am under arrest for defending myself.”
Mr Sewell then told the officer he was a “thug and a goon”.
“You’re a goon for the Jews, that’s what you are, that’s all you are, you’re a goon for the Jews,” he said as he was taken away.
Video footage of the march by the National Socialist Network through Melbourne’s CBD earlier this months shows a man running up to Mr Sewell as he walked at the head of a column of about 150 activists, spitting at him and punching him multiple times.
The video shows Mr Sewell responding with punches of his own before knocking the man to the ground.
Police said after the march that a man of no fixed address was taken to hospital with non-life threatening injuries.
Photos of Mr Sewell taken after the march show him with cuts to his ear and temple, and earlier this week he told reporters that he had also suffered a back injury as a result of the attack.
“I was attacked by a deluded deranged person that decided to jump in front of the ‘White man fight back’ rally,” he said, and showed journalists the injuries to the side of his head.
“We were performing a peaceful demonstration in the city, which we have the right to do as Australian citizens, I was attacked at the front of that rally by a deranged lunatic, and I defended myself.”
Header image: Left, Mr Sewell being arrested. Right, the clash with the homeless man (supplied).
You have all weekend to get informed, don’t miss any of it. Many remember him fighting with the truckers in Ottawa, fighting against the insanity by the government when Covid started.His name is Chris Sky. We cheered for him in the news and on social media daily. All of a sudden gone. He was taken of every social media platform, even X, simply because they didn’t want us to hear the truth. Finally he is back on one media. He talks and reveals everything that you can think of in the old spirit. Make sure you listen to him, you will not regret it. When the page opens scroll down to this second video. The first one kept disappearing. The only way to get it back was to start over again and push the timeline on the bottom to the page where it stopped. We had to do it several times. It looks like he is still censored heavily, too much truth for the sheep. Many short ads appear also but can be clicked away at the right bottom, SKIP AD. HE fought over 30 court cases in Canada and won all of them. The information he presents now from Mexico is incredible. Do not miss all these revelations.
Peter Brimelow writes: My wife Lydia Brimelow, president and only remaining staff member of the VDARE Foundation, has just issued this statement:
Statement by Lydia Brimelow
Completely unexpectedly, the Trump Administration has just taken three steps that could revolutionize VDARE’s multi-year struggle to protect its writers and donors from being divulged to New York State Attorney General Letitia James as part of her unconstitutional and ruinous “investigation” of us.
PeterBrimelow.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
1] Trump’s Justice Department has appointed a Special Prosecutor to probe Letitia James’ widely-reported pattern of personal mortgage fraud, going back 40 years.
Mortgage fraud is a serious offense, especially for a lawyer. Marilyn Mosby, the Baltimore prosecutor notorious for trying to jail police officers after the 2015 death of Freddy Gray, has been convicted of it and is now facing disbarment.
More importantly, the common law principle falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus (“false in one thing, false in all’) means any Letitia James statement can now be viewed with suspicion—specifically, her lies to courts about VDARE.
2] In a dramatic new development, the Justice Department has subpoenaed Letitia James as part of a federal grand jury investigation into Letitia James’ 2023 civil fraud case against Trump and his companies.
The issue: did James’ abusive prosecution constitute a “deprivation of Trump’s constitutional rights”?
Her prosecution resulted in an incredible $454 million judgement against Trump. (He has appealed).
Since James ran for election explicitly vowing to find some reason—any reason—to prosecute Trump, it obviously cannot be denied that she weaponized the justice system against him.
Similarly with Letitia James’ politically-motived prosecution of the National Rifle Association, which is now also the subject of Justice Department subpoenas.
Of course we’re a little wistful that the Justice Department did not include VDARE in this wave of subpoenas.
Because the pattern of deprivation of constitutional rights in our case is exactly the same. In 2022, just when Letitia James’ “investigation” of VDARE was getting started, her minion Rick Sawyer explicitly boasted to the Anti-Defamation League that, although “Hate Speech” (i.e. opinions on immigration that Letitia James dislikes), was indeed protected by the U.S. constitution, it was fortunately possible to suppress it through “massive investigations…without even going to court,”
Which is exactly what Letitia James has been doing to us.
Moreover, unlike President Trump and the NRA, we have not been charged—let alone convicted, of anything. So our case is even stronger.
So we are still hoping. And the prize is enormous. The penalties for federal Civil Rights violations can be devastating.
This new development offers us the possibility, not just of vindication, but of restitution.
3] In an August 7 Executive Order, “Guaranteeing Fair Banking For All Americans,” the Trump Administration banned political discrimination by banks and other financial institutions.
If this had been done in Trump’s first term—as was originally proposed—VDARE.com might well well still be functioning.
VDARE was driven to suspend by the costs of the relentless lawfare waged by Letitia James. But it also had extraordinary problems with Cancel Culture, especially in the last years of its life. The final straw was losing our ability to process credit card donations. The issue turned out to be, not the payment processors themselves—thus the heroic Andrew Torba’s GabPay was always willing to work with us—but the banks they relied upon. It was those banks that compelled the payment processors to drop us, apparently under pressure from the Federal government.
As we read this Executive Order, banks will now actually be obliged to contact and reinstate clients they had previously rejected.
And I am trying, with the VDARE Foundation board, to figure out what it all means.
Of course, replacing this one piece of the puzzle won’t put VDARE.com back together again. But if nothing else, if we can secure merchant services, it may allow us to sell tickets so that we can restart conferences at the Berkeley Springs Castle—which we were hoping to do, perhaps by next spring.