PAUL FROMM –SEARING INJUSTICE IN THE WHATCOTT FREE SPEECH CASE & HOW THE GREAT REPLACEMENT WORKS DEMORALIZING WHITES & STEALING THEIR JOBS
https://www.bitchute.com/video/YMrkl1JHYXyE
Speech delivered in Hamilton, June 27, 2026
Dear Friends,
If you missed my interview “Guilty” of Hate Speech” on the Victory Christian Network which has 66 radio stations across the United States and satellite internet radio which is available across the world, it is available here:
If you would like to help me and the Pacific Justice Institute (I am splitting this fundraiser 50/50 with them) as I go through the asylum process you can donate here:
https://www.givesendgo.com/bill-whatcott-persecuted-christian-from-
It is still a criminal offense for me to display my flyer. The Canadian public’s need to know what passes for criminal hate speech supersedes the Ontario Attorney General’s and Toronto Sodomite Pride Committee’s perceived need to keep this flyer under wraps, so here it is:
In Christ’s Service
Bill Whatcott
“But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.“
Matthew 6:33
—
Christ is the answer!
I tell the story of Canada’s latest political prisoner Bill Whatcott, a deeply sincere Christian who handed our Christian pamphlets at the 2016 Toronto Gay Pride Parade. Judge Anne Molloy declared him guilty under Canada’s notorious “hate law” on September 16. Our Charter is full of holes. Christians beware, our judicial system hates you and will try to silence you. You are not allowed to criticize privileged minorities. Free speech? A scarce commodity in Canada.
https://www.bloodriverradio.com/brr-september-19-2026-hour-2/
Dear Friends,
I talked to my lawyer about trying to get access for those who are interested in attending my court by zoom.`I guess Justice Malloy wants to be the final arbiter of who is allowed to view the proceedings and who isn’t. During the trial she rejected 100% of my friend’s requests, rejected MassResistance even though they have been covering my case for years, and she allowed a couple media outlets and a couple lawyers who were out of province to view the proceedings. It seemed to me the Crown liked the restrictions on the observers, who were overwhelmingly sympathetic to my cause and who were for years were well behaved and did not disrupt the court in any way.
Anyways, if you want to try to convince the judge to allow you to view the verdict on zoom you can send an e-mail to:
CriminalTrialOffice-SCJ-Toronto@ontario.ca
Address the heading of your e-mail with: “Request to Attend a Virtual Proceeding” and ask for the link to “R v Whatcott” for Wednesday, September 16, 2026 and make your argument as to why you should be allowed to attend via zoom. Last time the judge said she needed a good reason to allow someone to attend via zoom and she wasn’t too differential in regards to my desire to have my supporters present. It seemed her own kind, lawyers and the media were allowed. People who donated thousands of dollars to my legal defense over the years and who had a clear interest in my case were not given any consideration.
The most guaranteed way to hear the verdict is to attend in person:
Ontario Superior Court, 361 University Ave, Toronto, ON
Wednesday, September 16, 2026, 9:00 am
For those new to my site who want a little background as to what my alleged “hate crime” was: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/canadian-christian-activist-on-trial-for-an-alleged-hate-crime-that-took-place-at-a-2016-pride-parade/
Please pray for Monday. Justice Malloy will be holding a case conference with my counsel and with the Crown Prosecutors Monday Morning, I think 9:00 am Eastern Standard Time. I am not sure why. A conference only two days before the verdict date is not something I have seen before. Please keep me in your prayers as the sentencing draws near.
A missionary friend from Angola made this song for me. I didn’t solicit the song, but when he sent it to me, it sure was nice…..
Some of the pictures in this video are genuine that he got from my updates or from the internet and some he created I think. My missionary friend is a blessing. Sometimes out of the blue God puts it on his heart to do something like this and that makes me feel blessed….
In Christ’s Service, Bill Whatcott
Political Prisoner Released After 26 Days in Jail
EDMONTON. June 9, 2026. Today after a short court appearance, political prisoner Brad Love was released and told all charges would be dropped at a further court appearance in two weeks.
“I was scooped and spent 26 days in prison for nothing,” an angry Mr. Love told CAFE. He’d been arrested May 13 at his Fort McMurray residence, not allowed to get his pants or wallet or ID. He spent the first night in an RCMP cell in Fort McMurray without blankets on the concrete cell floor. Four days later he was transferred to Edmonton Remand Centre five hours away.
The charges were “breach of probation” for trespassing on some woman’s lawn and whacking a security camera with a stick. Mr. Love denied the charges and said bus transfers would prove he was elsewhere at the time of the alleged incidents. The RCMP who make a habit of harassing the outspoken free thinker slapped the handcuffs on anyway.
In court today, the Crown admitted that the video of the event confirmed that the whacker with a stick was not Mr. Love and a “witness” had recanted.
Fort McMurray is awash in drugs, Indian public drunkenness is a scandal and White tweekers, Indian drunks and numerous Third World newcomers fail to pay bus fare, but the local RCMP are fixated on Bad Love. After his arrest, they entered his dwelling, apparently, without a warrant and questioned his room mates as to whether Mr. Love made racial remarks. Whether he does or doesn’t is irrelevant to the bogus charges at issue.
Mr. Love described his release. He had $1,500 in his canteen — his money transferred by family members. The prison authorities would only hand over $500, the rest to come later. {How can they get away with this?] So, with no ID or credit card, Mr. Love had to find his way back to Fort McMurray. With no ID, he couldn’t board a plane. Finally, he persuaded a cab driver to accept $500, with the remaining $300 on arrival.
Of the 35 inmates released with Mr. Love, 25 were Indians. None had money. They were given bus passes to head downtown to the Indian Friendship Centre.
We had a nearly full house at the monthly meeting of the Canadian Association for Free Expression in Toronto tonight. Good news from our speaker and former political prisoner Bill Whatcott. His projected three week re-trial on “hate” charges stemming out of his infiltration and leafletting of the 2016 Toronto Gay Pride (?) parade is over after four days.
Next Wednesday is final submissions and then the judge will consider this dynamic Christian’s fate.
At the last minute, on Monday, Mr. Whatcott opted for a trial by judge rather than jury. The judge is Ann Molloy who has a reputation for fairness and has made some rulings that have not endeared her to the woke. Also a vocal Christian who is seeking to run for Mayor of Toronto picked up a number of signatures on his nomination forms at the meeting.
TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS COMMITTEE ON JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS
RE: BILL C-9 , THE COMBATTING HATE ACT
SUBMISSION OF THE CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION INC.
TO THE HOUSE OF COMMONS COMMITTEE ON JUSTICE AND HUMAN RIGHTS
RE: BILL C-9 , THE COMBATTING HATE ACT
The Canadian Association for Free Expression Inc. (CAFE) was formed in 1983 and is incorporated by Letters Patent as a non-profit organization under the laws of the Province of Ontario. CAFE has intervened in many court cases and human rights cases, especially Canadian Human Rights Commission prosecutions under the old and now repealed Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. CAFE stands for the maximizing of freedom of speech within Canadian society. We believe that bad speech can be counteracted by good speech, not suppression.
CAFE is utterly opposed to Bill C-9 as an outrageous infringement on free speech.
“ I am Canadian, a free Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship God in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, free to choose those who govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.” These inspiring words of former PrimeMinister John Diefenbaker form the opening of the Canadian Bill of Rights (1960). What an inspiring vision of a free and constructive society! The trade off for being able to freely express one’s own thoughts and beliefs is to tolerate the same freedom in expression from others.
However, that is not the Canada of the last decade. Canada has descended into a cancel culture, where certain views are deplatformed. Last summer U.S. Gospel country singer Sam Feucht had numerous municipal venues cancelled because officials did not approve of his conservative religious views. “
“Cities across Canada have canceled tour performances from Sean Feucht, a right-wing Christian musician with ties to the Trump administration and the Republican Party.
The cancellations include Quebec City, where the city said it pulled a contract for Feucht’s planned free Friday show at the ExpoCité venue due to “new elements.” (The Independent, July 25, 2025)
Under the Emergencies Act, now ruled by the Federal Court of Appeal as having been unjustifiably invoked by the Government, protests were declared illegal and people who had supported the Truckers’ Freedom Convoy had their bank accounts seized.
Several years ago, Parliament plunged into the world of history and declared that holocaust denial was a form of hate punishable by two years in prison. Emboldened, others have tried to declare one view of history to be ensconced in law. NDP MP Leah Gazan has three times introduced a private member’s bill which would make it illegal to question or deny accounts of death and abuse at residential schools.
Increasingly, there is only one correct progressive view on controversial social issues. Contrary views are to be silenced or suppressed. Many of the provisions of C-9 follow this pattern of thought control
Writing in the National Post (January 23, 2026), Terry Newman captures this atmosphere of suppressed and forbidden speech: “In 2016, Jordan Peterson, who was a University of Toronto psychology professor at the time, expressed his concern that proposed federal human rights legislation would treat his refusal to use alternate pronouns like “they” “ze” and “zir” as hate speech. This led to protests, a loss of funding and an endless stream of hit pieces.The following year at Wilfrid Laurier University, Lindsay Shepherd, who was a teaching assistant at the time, showed a short clip of Peterson debating gender-neutral pronouns in front of her communications class.Shortly afterwards, she was brought into a closed-door meeting, where she was accused of a number of ridiculous things, including “neutrally playing a speech by Hitler,” and was told that even showing the clip and asking the students to discuss it was legitimizing Peterson’s views.
These are all high-profile events, which might lead you to believe that, if this is all that’s happening on university campuses, things aren’t really that bad. But several campus surveys have suggested otherwise. A 2025 survey found that more than half of students were reluctant to discuss transgenderism and the Israel-Hamas conflict. Almost half wouldn’t even talk about politics, and a majority were in favour of limiting free expression on campuses.This kind of thinking isn’t limited to universities. A 2023 Angus Reid survey found that 58 per cent Canadians believed it was acceptable for universities to ban speakers who promote offensive views on race and gender.”
In a recent article, John Carpay, Director of the Centre for Justice and Constitutional Freedoms highlighted censorship on campus: “Since the 1990s, the cancer of censorship has been tolerated and coddled by university officials across Canada. Predictably, this cancer has spread. It is no longer limited only to pro-life groups.
Today, the vast majority of Canadian universities have a strong commitment to “diversity,” “equity” and “inclusion” in their mission, vision, and values statements. They impose woke ideology on all students and faculty. They have a very limited willingness to uphold free expression, open inquiry, and the pursuit of truth.
The Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Institutional Capacity-Building Grants of the federal government also undermines free speech and the pursuit of truth. In order to qualify for these grants, universities must impose mandatory training for students, faculty, and staff on “anti-oppression” and “unconscious bias” strategies. However, the biggest funders of public universities are Canada’s provincial governments, not the federal government.
It would take not just a book, but a large encyclopedia set, to document all the cases of Canadian universities and student unions censoring speech on campus in the past 30 years. The following are just a few examples.
In 2017, McMaster University in Hamilton allowed a loud, angry mob to shout down Jordan Peterson, then a professor at the University of Toronto, and prevent him from speaking. The university’s president has not apologized.
Mount Royal University, in addition to firing Widdowson because of her public disagreement with woke ideology, also cancelled its instructor Mark Hecht, in response to people claiming to be offended by his 2019 Vancouver Sun column that criticized diversity.
In 2019, Simon Fraser University cowered to extremists by cancelling a panel discussion titled “How Media Bias Shapes the Gender Identity Debate.” The panelists included Meghan Murphy and Jonathan Kay, and moderator Lindsay Shepherd. In violation of the Criminal Code, trans activists threatened to physically disrupt the event by engaging in property destruction and false fire alarm activation. SFU, like so many other universities, practiced cancel culture under the guise of “safety and security.” (Real Women of Canada Newsletter, January 30, 2026)
The Hate Law
It must be clearly understood that the “hate law”, Sections 318 and 319 of the Criminal Code, which became law in 1971 was never about suppressing hate — a human emotion, but about suppressing certain political or religious points of view.
Its very origins were steeped in politics. The Canadian Jewish Congress had been lobbying for several decades for anti-free speech legislation to suppress expressions highly critical of Jews. Accordingly, the fix was in, when the Royal Commission on Hate Propaganda consisted of two former presidents of the Canadian Jews Congress,including its Chairman Dean Maxwell Cohen. Not surprisingly, the Royal Commission proposed serious restrictions on freedom of opinion, which became the “hate law”, passed by Parliament in 1971.
Also, the Canadian elite, especially the Liberal Party were in the process of fundamentally changing Canada’s immigration policy with the long range view to replace the European founding/settler people. Massive Third World immigration would predictably generate resistance as it had in Britain; for instance, Enoch Powell’s famous “Rivers of Blood” speech of 1968. A “hate” law would help mute strong opposition. Indeed, that’s what happened. The first convictions under the hate law were Don Andrews and Robert Smith of the Western Guard for publishing strident anti-immigrant views in a newsletter which, it was indicated at trial, had all of 106 subscribers. Both were sentenced to six months in prison.
A survey of the application of the “hate law” demonstrates how intensely political it has been. No person on the left has ever been charged under this law. The victims have been exclusively Whites and people with views that might be seen as “right wing.” Only two non-Whites have ever been charged under the “hate law.” None has been convicted.
In 2025 Ron Banerjee of Toronto, a vocal Hindu nationalist and associate of the Jewish Defence League, was charged for inflammatory statements he made during a confrontation at a Sikh Gurdwara in Brampton. Mayor Patrick Brown had demanded that Banerjee be charged. Late in 2025, the charges were quietly dropped.
The only other non-European ever charged was Chief David Ahenakew of Saskatchewan. He was a founder of the Assembly of First Nations and a Cree chief. In 2002, he made controversial statements about Jews, based on things he’d heard while serving with the Canadian Armed forces in post-war Germany. On appeal, he was acquitted.
There are plenty of virulent anti-American statements but no proponent of this form of hatred has ever been charged. There are numerous defamatory statements about Christianity and, in the wake of the discovery of anomalies in the soil near the old Kamloops Residential School, over 150 Christian churches have been the victims of serious vandalism or arson. There have been few charges and none for hate.Scandalously, then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau all but excused the hatred and the arsons directed against Christian churches: ” Trudeau on July 2, 202 stated: “I understand the anger that’s out there against the federal government, against institutions like the Catholic Church. It is real and it’s fully understandable, given the shameful history that we are all becoming more and more aware of and engaging ourselves to do better as Canadians.”[The Catholic Register, January 13, 2024]
In many of its publications, the Government of Canada, especially Heritage Canada defames Canada’s founding/settler European people as racists and occupiers who all but stole Native land.
Under Canada’s ‘hate law” regime Christians and Europeans or Whites can expect no protection. The Supreme Court made it clear in Whatcott 2013 that the anti-hate provisions, at least in terms of Human Rights Commissions do not apply to Whites or Christians as they are not “vulnerable minorities.”
Thus, the “hate law” is not really about fighting hate nor is it about providing equal protection to all Canadians. It functions to limit criticism of certain privileged groups.
We submit that Bill C-9 will make a bad situation even worse.
Specifically,
1. CAFE opposes the proposal to not require the provincial Attorney General’s consent for laying charges under this law. The original “hate law” required the consent of the Attorney-General as a check against hasty police action resulting from the prejudice of senior police officers or public pressure. For two years, for instance, there have been strident demands by Jewish lobby groups that more “hate” charges be laid. The consent of the Attorney-General is by no means a failsafe protection of free speech and dissent but it IS something. That there are demands that this safeguard be done away with illustrates an unhealthy desire to silence dissent.
2. CAFE is vehemently opposed to the banning of the display of certain symbols in public places. It is explained that these would be symbols of various terrorist groups and the swastika. This latter symbol makes our point that this law is entirely political. If the swastika is to be banned why not the flags of such odious regimes as North Korea which has brutalized its people or the hammer and sickle, the emblem of communism, which, in the 20th century piled up over 100-million victims, many time the number of victims attributed to the National Socialists who flew the swastika.
Flags and symbols are important means by which people express their identity and affiliation. Many people in Regina sport the green and yellow of their hometown Roughriders. Canadians travelling abroad often make certain they have a Canadian flag as a lapel pin or badge so that they are not mistaken for Americans. An expression of one’s affiliation may be odious to a person of the opposite affiliation. Israeli flags are offensive to many Palestinians, just as the emblems of Hamas are offensive to fervent Zionists. Curbing the display of certain symbols because they are offensive to some people is an outrageous and discriminatory assault on one’s freedom of belief and expression. As noted, not all offensive symbols would be banned — an impossibility as the capacity to feel offended is unlimited.
The social contract for free expression requires the toleration of the opposite view. Annoyance or offence never justifies violence.
3. Perhaps the most outrageous and totalitarian measure in this bill is that it will “create a hate crime offence of committing an offence under that Act or any other Act of Parliament that is motivated by hatred based on certain factors.” Here clearly it is opinions that are being targetted. A person who commits an offence punishable by 14 years in prison could, if the offence was motivated by hatred of a privileged group, have an additional sentence of up to LIFE IN PRISON, even, if he did not receive the maximum of 14 years. This is criminalizing opinion.
For instance, a man is drunk and exits a bar in a foul mood. He dislikes homeless people. He sees a homeless person, hollers “take this, you bum!” and punches him in the face, breaking his nose and causing injury. He might be sentenced to, say, six months in prison for assault causing bodily harm. Homeless people are not a privileged group under the “hate law.”
Take the same scenario. The drunk, in this case, dislikes homosexuals. On exiting the bar, he sees a homosexual, hollers “that this, you fag!” and punches him in the face, breaking his nose and causing injury. He is sentenced to six months for assault causing bodily harm. However, homosexuals are one of the privileged classes and, under C-9, the sentence could be increased on the basis that the crime was committed because of hatred against a privileged group.
Yet, in both cases the injury is the same — a broken nose and facial injuries. The homeless victim suffers no less pain than the homosexual victim. This provision is offensive to any notion of equality.
We ask that the Committee accept these respectful submissions and those of many other critics of the Bill and urge its defeat. — Paul Fromm, Director
The Canadian Association for Free Expression Inc.,
P.O. Box 332,
Rexdale, ON.,
M9W 5L3,
CANADA.
416-428-5308
Political Prisoner Les Bory Heads to Court Monday, Denied Disclosure & A Laptop to Prep
REXDALE, January 2, 2025. Political prisoner Les Bory made a rare call from prison today. Monday he heads to Court in Brantford in a landmark free speech trial which sees the state trying to curb online dissent.
“They’ve scheduled a two week jury trial,” Mr. Bory told CAFE. Sixteen videos Les Bory recorded online are at issue. “I still haven’t seen the disclosure from my lawyer. I was never provided with a computer to help prepare my defence,” he adds.
“I was supposed to have a bail review every 90 days, but I have had no such reviews,” he says. Meanwhile the nation’s streets are awash with villains charged with murder or brutal assault out on easy bail. The highly politicized Canadian justice system punishes dissident thought or speech harshly, but shrugs at brutal deeds. Mr. Bory has been in prison since February 14, 2023 — nearly two years.
Mr. Bory, who has no criminal record, is charged with three counts of uttering threats, specifically against Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, police and Jews. Far more seriously, he is charged under Sec. 319 of Canada’s notorious “hate law” for wilfully promoting hatred against a legally privileged group, in this case Jews. For this he could get two years in prison. Most seriously he is charged under Sec. 318 of the “hate law” with promoting genocide, against Jews.
This is the first time Sec. 318 has been used. It required the consent, Mr. Bory states, of the federal Attorney-General. For this, Mr. Bory could receive up to five years in prison.
Conditions at Maplehurst Detention Centre are crowded and violent. “I have one of the shittiest jobs, cleaning out segregation cells. Some of these prisoners make a horrible mess,” Mr. Bory explains. “But it gets me out of my cell and moving about.”
Mr. Bory’s trial will be held in Ontario Superior Court at 70 Wellington Street in Brantford and commences at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, January 6,
I just got out of what appears to be my last hearing in Practice Court for this seemingly never ending “hate crime” trial. To give some history for those who may not know. In 2016 I applied to march in the Toronto Homosexual Pride parade as an openly Christian man and desired to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ with the participants.
This parade after all is funded by three levels of government (you and I pay for it) and it is supposed to be “inclusive.” In fact two of Pride Toronto’s “values” as stated on the front page of their website is “Diversity” and “Inclusion.” What could be more diverse than an open Christian sharing the Gospel with Toronto pride participants right in their parade?
And yes, Christians should go and share the Gospel at the Toronto Homosexual Pride parade and everywhere else where lost souls can be found.
“Go into all the world and proclaim the Gospel to the whole creation.” Mark 16:15
Sadly, notwithstanding the parade’s alleged commitment to “inclusion” and “diversity,” the parade was not accepting of Bible believing Christians like me, so I had to apply as a Gay Zombie Cannabis Consumer to get in.
“To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ) that I might win those outside the law. To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. I do it all for the sake of the Gospel, that I may share with them in its blessings.” 1 Corinthians 9:21-23
Anyways, once we got into the parade, we proceeded to deliver 3000 “Zombie Safe Sex” packages to the parade participants. I am no longer able to show you the Gospel flyer contained in the “Zombie Safe Sex” package, as the Ontario Attorney General is alleging the flyer is a “hate crime.” Mass Resistance decided to put the flyer up on their website in the United States where free speech enjoys greater protection. You can see my flyer there if you are so inclined and decide for yourself if it is criminal hate speech. The flyer contained the Gospel of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ, criticism of Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Party’s homosexual activism, a testimony of a former transvestite who regained his manhood, as well as warnings about the health risks related to homosexual behaviour.
Anyways, by all accounts our crack Christian commando Gospel infiltration of the Toronto homosexual pride parade was a smashing success. We got out all 3,000 “Zombie Safe Sex” packages containing valuable Gospel and health information for lost homosexuals.
Notwithstanding, disrespectful displays and signs mocking Christians being allowed at the Toronto Pride Parade year after year, and notwithstanding homosexual activists crashing and cancelling Christian events when it suits them; it seems the homosexual activists are a vindictive and humourless bunch, and not really inclined to embrace the concept of free speech when a Christian pulls one over on them.
Within days of Pride Toronto realizing I utilized their taxpayer funded parade to spread the Gospel and accurate health information on the risks of the homosexual lifestyle while disguised as a gay zombie, homosexual activist lawyer Doug Elliott, with the Deputy Premier of Ontario and a gaggle of homosexual activists decended on Parliament Hill in Ottawa to announce a $104 million class action lawsuit against me and anyone connected with me. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Premier Kathleen Wynne, the Liberal Party, as well as all the parade participants, were named as “victims” in the class action lawsuit.
After threatening me with jail if I didn’t give up the names of my helpers and wasting a pile of time and money for two years trying to extract blood out of a stone, the homosexual activists decided to drop their lawsuit as I wasn’t speaking and I didn’t have any money to give them. The homosexual activists/Ontario government opted to go after me in 2018 by issuing a Canada Wide Arrest Warrant, charging me with “Wilful Promotion of Hatred.” At the time the Attorney General was seeking 18 months in prison upon conviction.
I turned myself in, spent a few days in jail, and was flown to Ontario, where I went on trial and was eventually found “Not Guilty.”
I thought that was the end of the matter, but the Ontario Attorney General actually appealed my acquittal and The Ontario Court of Appeal ordered me to go on trial again! My side appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada to reverse the Court of Appeal’s decision but they refused to hear my case.
I was put on bail again, and had to linger in Ontario for a few months unemployed, going to court, and applying for legal aid as my legal fees for this next trial will be as expensive as the last trial ($100,000 or so). Over the years I was able to raise tens of housands of dollars for my lawyers, but barring a miracle there is no way I could afford a lawyer for this trial.
The Attorney General argued and the Ontario Court of Appeal agreed that a second trial is needed to consider my “historical discreditable conduct.”
The above is an example of what the Attorney General thinks is “discredible conduct” that I engaged in “historically.” Bringing up these past missionary endeavours and flyers that go back as far as 25 years and actually have nothing to do with the 2016 Toronto Pride parade flyer, is supposed to help make the case I am a hate criminal and my latest Gospel flyer is criminal hate speech.
The Ontario Court of Appeal also decided the first trial judge erred by declining to admit Nick Mule’ (the guy in the video video below) as an “expert.” Mr. Mule’ was paid a pile of taxpayer’s money to write an “expert” paper that was supposed to help the court understand that I committed “microagressions” against the parade participants and that my flyer was going to cause “minority stress” and lead to bad health outcomes, if I was not criminally convicted and stopped.
Full disclosure, I only listened for a few minutes and skipped to a few random parts of this guy’s lecture. If one does as I do, they will realize very quickly Mr. Mule’s “expertise” is on all things homosexual, and no doubt he would want me in jail for my flyer. But really, why is Nick Mule’s opinion more relevant than Joe the welder’s opinion on my flyer?
Anyways, on Monday, August 12, I learned my new trial dates and the dates I need to travel to Ontario and be in court again.
I will be in person in the Ontario Superior Court in Toronto for the week of June 23-27, 2025. If any friends wish to join me in court this week, I would be grateful. My legal team will be arguing I should have a right to a jury trial, as the Prosecutor is still arguing for substantial jail time (6 months to one year) and I will have a criminal record showing an indictable offencce
if I am convicted.
I will be in the Ontario Superior Court in Toronto for the week of October 27-31, 2025. My friends are welcome to attend this hearing also. My defence team will be arguing against the Attorney General’s attempt to introduce my past flyers and missionary work as evidence of “discreditable conduct” that is relevant to my new trial.
Finally, my trial will commence the week of March 2, 2026 and is expected to last two weeks. The trial will take place in the Ontario Superior Court in Toronto and of course I am required to attend in person. The trial is open to the public and my friends are welcome to attend.
My legal defence is covered by legal aid and I am NOT raising money for legal fees, but obviously travelling to Toronto for all these court dates and trying to secure even a modest shelter, gas, food, parking, transit, etc…. for those months is going to be expensive.
I can live quite modestly and believe I can probably make the three trips for $7000 give or take a little and hopefully save some expenses by staying with friends or utilize travellers hostels to lower some of my costs. If you would like to help with this phase of my journey, I will be grateful.
To donate to Bill’s Lifefunder you can go here: https://www.lifefunder.com/whatcott
“Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ.” Galatians 6:2
Email starts:
Subject: I would like to report a Hate Crime, advocating murder
Bill Whatcott <billwhatcott@gmail.com>
To: vpd.diversity@vpd.ca, campus.security@ubc.ca
Date: Jul 15, 2024, 4:49 PM
Dear Vancouver Hate Crime Unit, CC: UBC Campus Security,
I would like to report the UBC Professor Dr. Karen Pinder and Ingrid Barta, who is also employed at the University of British Columbia, for Public Incitement of Hatred/Wilful Promotion of Hatred, Section 319 of Canada’s Criminal Code. Attached is a screen grab of their public statements celebrating the attempted murder of US Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump. I do not believe students who are conservative are safe with these two women holding positions of authority on campus. Left leaning students could take this type of endorsement of violence by a senior faculty member to heart with potentially terrible consequences.
Sincerely,
Bill Whatcott
Phone: 403-598-0478
End of E-mail
——————————————————–
Public Incitement of Hatred
Section 319 (1)
Everyone who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of an offence.
Wilful Promotion of Hatred
Section 319 (2)
Everyone who by communicating statements other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of an offence.
——————————————————-
To be clear. These women should absolutely be fired from their positions at the University of British Columbia if the university wishes to maintain any credibility.
When it comes to police and courts I am not a huge fan of these two nasty women facing a criminal process for their awful public speech, but…….
Every university that I went to, including the University of British Columbia, have called the police on me and attempted to have me criminally prosecuted when I attempted to hold a sign, preach, or hand out flyers expressing views they disagreed with on their campuses. When I was a student, 100% of my faculty at MacEwan university supported hate crime laws and believed it was an offense to call a biological male a male if the said male claimed he was a woman.
Karen and Ingrid are on the far left of the political spectrum and are the sorts who like hate crime laws. One can also reasonably conclude that in Ingrid’s case, given she is still wearing a face diaper on her avatar of her now deleted X account, she likely supports the coercive mask mandates. In spite of the “science” conclusively showing that face masks are appropriate for stopping sputum and blood droplets when working over open wounds, but they do absolutely nothing to slow the spread of airborne viruses when wearing them all day long in public; Ingrid was likely very sad the day the government stopped coercing people to wear face diapers.
So, in light of this, it seems reasonable that the sorts of people who support state control of speech, should at least live by their own rules. In my view the speech of these women is far more hateful than my flyer. I never celebrated the murder of anyone. In my flyer the warning against unhealthy practices is clear, as well as the offer of redemption through the shed blood of Jesus Christ to homosexuals who wish to have their sins forgiven.
“If we say we have fellowship with Him while we walk in darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth. But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus His Son cleanses us from all sin. If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.” 1 John 1:6-9
These two women posted on X they want a prominent Conservative dead, period. They offer no pathway to redemption for conservatives. Their speech simply wishes death to a conservative politician because they hate him and what he professes to believe in.
Woke Crown Prosecutor Jennifer Epstein argued to the judge who oversaw my bail hearing in 2018, that my speech could cause “psychological harm” to LGBT Canadians. She worried my speech would cause “harm” to homosexuals across Canada if I didn’t have stringent bail conditions imposed on me, limiting my right to say anything in public regarding homosexuality, including even my own criminal charges that I was now facing.
If this is the metric leftists want, what about the psychological well being of conservative students who are forced to attend Karin Pinder’s classes? What about conservative students who are required to work in a subordinate role with Ingrid Barta? If adult homosexuals are too delicate to bear my words warning them about the risks of HIV, anal warts, anal cancer and a host of other maladies, related to their promiscuous and high risk sexual behaviour, shouldn’t young students be protected from two women who publicly celebrate the attempted murder of a conservative political figure?
I filed the hate crime complaint today and will follow up by phone tomorrow. We will see if the Vancouver Police are consistent in protecting everyone equally from “hate speech.” Thanks to hateful women like these two, everyone on university campuses across Canada feel they must be left or far left. Conservative can’t safely express themselves without fear of being discriminated against and cancelled. This must change. Conservative lives matter!
On other news. I was in court briefly today in front of Justice Bonnie L. Croll. She set my next hearing in Practice Court to Monday, August 12, 9:00 am, Toronto time. Today, I was informed the court will set aside 2-4 weeks for my “hate crime” trial. My trial date should be set at the August 12 Practice Court hearing. The zoom link will be: https://ca01web.zoom.us/j/65919371490
In Christ’s Service,
Bill Whatcott
“Therefore lay aside all filthiness and overflow of wickedness, and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls.” James 1:21