“Oppose Bill S-233”– No CPP, EI, OAS to Unvaxxed Canadians!!!
Senate is about to pass the 3rd reading of this bill which will ban payments of CPP, EI, OAS to unvaxxed Canadians!!! Share this widely, of course, but we need to figure out other things to do to stop this.
Bill S-233 is currently waiting for third reading in the SENATE, if passed it will be made law which means if you are not vaccinated you will not receive EI, CPP, OHS, Social Services or Pension that YOU PAID INTO. This is part of the New Social Bank Credit System. Also c-273 is aimed at SENIORS who are not vaccinated, even if they can’t for any reason, they will not receive any benefits that they worked all their lives for. Copy and paste all the Senate emails plus add your local MP and send one broadcast email. The government is trying to sneak this in
while folks are distracted with the Ukraine situation. People need to immediately write their local Federal MP and all the senate members a broadcast email Subject line: “Oppose Bill S-233” as it violates a democratic society.
Here is the list of all the Senate email addresses:
A Discussion About Canadian Political Prisoner Leslie Bory — Prisoners on Remand Face Deprivation – Comments by Ex-Political Prisoners Alfred & Monika Schaefer, With Paul Fromm, Canadian Association for Free Expression
P.E.I. councillor accused of posting anti-Indigenous sign seeking judicial review
The sign posted by Councillor John Robertson, which is posted saying “Truth: Mass Graves Hoax, Reconciliation: Redeem Sir John A’s Integrity.” (Courtesy: Gregory Miller)
[We have pointed to this worrisome problem before. An elected official questions one of the sacred cows of wokeness and finds himself/herself fined or prevented by their elected body from fulfilling their duties to their real employers, those who elected them. This had happened in Prince Edward Island to Councillor John Robertson. — Paul Fromm, Director, CAFE]
A village councillor in Prince Edward Island is asking a court to quash sanctions imposed on him after he displayed a sign on his property referring to a “mass grave hoax” in relation to evidence of unmarked graves at former residential schools.
In documents filed last week with the P.E.I. Supreme Court, Murray Harbour Coun. John Robertson claims fellow councillors exceeded their authority and violated his rights on Nov. 18, 2023, when they decided he had breached the council’s code of conduct.
The councillors then decided to impose a $500 fine and suspend him from his municipal post for six months. Robertson, elected in November 2022, was also removed as chair of the maintenance committee and ordered to write an apology to the mayor, council and the Indigenous community.
The councillor’s application for judicial review, dated Feb. 16, says those sanctions were unreasonable because they failed to account for his fundamental rights to freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, as guaranteed by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Robertson argues that he shouldn’t be punished for stating personal opinions that have nothing to do with his role as an elected member of council.
Between late September and early October last year, coinciding with the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation, the councillor displayed a sign on his property with the message, “Truth: mass grave hoax” and “Reconciliation: Redeem Sir John A.’s integrity.”
Macdonald, Canada’s first prime minister, is considered an architect of the residential school system because he championed policies of assimilation and violence toward Indigenous people….
“The subject of Mr. Robertson’s impugned statements included questioning the reliability of news reports of a political nature and providing an opinion respecting a political figure and did not relate to any function undertaken by Mr. Robertson as a member of council,” the application says, arguing the other councillors employed an “overboard interpretation” of the code of conduct.
The document says Robertson has resisted requests to resign, “asserting that the expression of his personal opinions on political topics were not properly the subject of the council’s oversight.” Terry White, mayor of Murray Harbour, population 282, could not be reached for comment Friday.
At one point, the council hired a third-party investigator who concluded Robertson’s signs breached the code of conduct, but the investigator did not make any recommendations about sanctions, the application says. As well, the document asserts that council did not provide reasons for its actions.
On Dec. 20, provincial Communities Minister Rob Lantz said Robertson had until the end of that month to comply with the sanctions. But when that deadline passed, Lantz announced a two-week extension on Jan. 2, saying Robertson had just returned to Canada and was unaware of the ultimatum.
That deadline also came and went. On Jan. 24, Lantz confirmed he had asked a law firm to conduct an inquiry into the matter, mainly because he had received advice from government lawyers saying it was the prudent thing to do, given that the province had never before dealt with this kind of case.
At the time, Lantz said the councillor had failed to show up for council meetings or respond to council’s findings. “He’s shown contempt for his colleagues on council, and contempt for the process,” Lantz said in an interview last month.
Under the province’s Municipal Government Act, only the minister has the power to dismiss a councillor.
Robertson has received calls for his resignation from P.E.I. Sen. Brian Francis, Abegweit First Nation Chief Roderick Gould Jr., as well as the Murray Harbour mayor and other councillors.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 23, 2024.
I have not forgotten the insult visited on us at the riot at the Legislature. A mob of urban terrorist counter-protesters ruined the gathering at which speakers were informing the public about the IN-sanity of the SOGI program.
The head of the Criminal justice Branch ignored my letters. Then when I laid criminal charges myself, the Deputy Attorney General stayed my private Information. By no means is this over. I am now preparing for Judicial Review of that ‘stay’. This message is sent to the 30 + people I know, who were there that day, outraged as I was … and still am … by what we experienced. I am gathering witness statements to put in front of a Judge
On February 21st 2024, I went in to the Provincial Court at Victoria and submitted a private Information. The 5 counts are spelled-out below. Justice of the Peace P Braz endorsed my complaint. He then asked me to provide more information for the Crown Counsel. I came back a day later and handed in the 3 letters which I had previously sent to Deputy Attorney General Peter Juk, head of the Prosecution Service. The letters recited the facts, including the transcript of the ZOOM call in which leaders of the labour unions in Canada declared they would DISRUPT DISTURB DEMORALIZE rallies planned by the #1 Million March 4 Children. That transcript is hard evidence of criminal conspiracy to commit indictable offences. Mr Juk never replied.
JP Braz set down the matter to be heard in Court April 17th 2024 to fix a date for the next stage in the process.
After an Information is laId, the Informant appears before that Justice of the Peace, or, a judge of the Provincial Court, for a Process hearing in camera. Meaning : closed to the public. After hearing the complainant and his witnesses, the judge decides if a case has been made out sufficient for it to go ahead to trial. If so, he or she directs the Registrar to put the matter on the Court List.
Over the last 40 years, I have laid a couple dozen private Informations. Out of them, 4 times my complaint did go for a full hearing. A few of them proceeded to trials, out of which came a couple of convictions.
I have been through more than a couple of Process hearings So I know how it goes. Or, how it’s supposed to go. On February 29th 2024 Kimberley Henders Miller Deputy Regional Crown Counsel notified me that she had directed my charges to be ‘stayed’.
the Judicial Review tells the court that I have been denied my right to due process of law. As well, that the Criminal Justice Branch cannot treat this matter fairly because of perceived conflict of interest :ie. that the Prosecution Service is fully entrained in the mind-set of the administration of the day ( the NDP government ) which assumes the mental illness of A-pot-em-no-philia is ‘normal’. So that those of us who assert our political and /or religious opinion out loud, are breaching the Civil Rights Code. Result being : the government agency which ought to prosecute those who carried on a criminal conspiracy to “DISRUPT DESTROY DEMORALIZE” ( as they boasted in their ZOOM call, 2 weeks in advance of the riot ) instead, protects the offenders from accountability at law in order to save the government from embarrassment.
I am asking those of you who were profoundly offended by the riot to prepare a written statement of what you recall happened on the lawn of the Legislature, on September 20th 2023. Your statement can be as long as you like. Then get it to me. It will form part of the Materials to be relied upon in my Petition for Judicial Review.
I am not a lawyer. I do not pretend to be a lawyer. I do not take $$s for legal advice. Feel free to contact me to help you put together a “will say” statement. If you want to, your witness statement can be made in to an Affidavit, then, sworn at the Registry counter for $40. Photographs and/or significant items/ documents can be attached to it as Exhibits in order to get them in as evidence.
What I want is, for a Justice of the Supreme Court to hear me out in a proper Process Hearing. Especially, for witnesses to each take the stand to corroborate my charges. At that stage, the thing is public. Publicity is the soul of Justice
Gordon S Watson May 11th 2024
…………………………………………………………………………………….
Court Identifier 187706-1
CANADA:
PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
PROVINCE DE LA COLOMBIE-BRITANNIQUE
In the Provincial Court of British Columbia
In the matter of An Act respecting the criminal law RSC 1985 Chapter C-46
Form 2
INFORMATION
This is the Information of / les presents constituent la denonciation de Gordon Stephen Watson, politician, (“the informant” / le denonciateur ) of / de Metchosin British Columbia, hereinafter called the Informant.
Count 1 : The Informant says that he has reasonable and probable grounds to believe and does believe that: on September 16th 2023 via a conference call in which some of its participants were in British Columbia, BC FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ; BC FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; BC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES UNION doing business as BC GEU ; RON HALPIN ; ONTARIO FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; PATTY JARVIS COATES ; CHANDRA–LI PAUL ; VICKI SMALLMAN ; CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS ; YOLANDA B’DACY ; MARTIN REILLY ; EMILY QUAILE ; PETER VEITCH ; CAROLYN EGAN ; ANTHONY MARCO ; MUNIB SJJAD ; DON FRY ; CUPE ONTARIO ; SUSAN GAPKA ; JOHN DOE ; JANE DOE did agree one with another to counsel commission of crimes at places across Canada, particularly, the grounds of the Legislature in Victoria, thus engaging in a conspiracy to commit an indictable offence, to wit, common nuisance contrary to sections 465 and 180 of the Criminal Code.
Count 2 : The Informant says that he has reasonable and probable grounds to believe and does believe that: on September 16th 2023 via a conference call in which some participants were in British Columbia, BC FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ;BC FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; BC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES UNION doing business as BC GEU ; RON HALPIN ; ONTARIO FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; PATTY JARVIS COATES ; CHANDRA–LI PAUL ; VICKI SMALLMAN ; CANADIAN LABOUR CONGRESS ; YOLANDA B’DACY ; MARTIN REILLY ; EMILY QUAILE ; PETER VEITCH ; CAROLYN EGAN ; ANTHONY MARCO ; MUNIB SJJAD ; DON FRY ; CUPE ONTARIO ; SUSAN GAPKA ; JOHN DOE ; JANE DOE did agree one with another to counsel commission of crimes at places across Canada, particularly, the grounds of the Legislature in Victoria, thus engaging in a conspiracy to commit an indictable offence, to wit, wilfully disturbing or interupting an assemblage of persons met for moral, social or benevolent purpose, contrary to sections 465 and 176 of the Criminal Code.
Count 3 : The Informant says that he believes on reasonable grounds that on September 20th 2023 WINONA WALDRON ; BC FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ; BC FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; BC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES UNION doing business as BC GEU, via their union members, agents and/or employees, did make common nuisance on the grounds of the Legislature in Victoria, and that they did so deliberately to compel him to abstain from his lawful right to participate in the democratic process, contrary to section 180 of the Criminal Code.
Count 4 : The Informant says that he believes on reasonable grounds that on September 20th 2023 WINONA WALDRON ; BC FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ; BC FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; BC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES UNION doing business as BC GEU, via their union members, agents and/or employees, did make common nuisance on the grounds of the Legislature in Victoria, and that they did so deliberately to compel him to abstain from his lawful right to assemble peacefully with other citizens, contrary to section 180 of the Criminal Code.
Count 5 : The Informant says that he believes on reasonable grounds that on September 20th 2023 on the grounds of the Legislature in Victoria WINONA WALDRON ; BC FEDERATION OF TEACHERS ; BC FEDERATION OF LABOUR ; BC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES UNION doing business as BC GEU, via their union members, agents and/or employees ; JOHN DOE ; JANE DOE did intimidate him and others and that aforementioned ACCUSED did so to compel him to abstain from his lawful right to participate in the democratic process, contrary to section 423 of the Criminal Code.
Pursuant to section 508 1. (2) of the Criminal Code and/or section 13.1 of the Offence Act ( British Columbia) the Informant states that all matters contained in this Information are true tomy knowledge and belief
Suivant le paragraphse 508.1 (2) du Code criminal et / ou l’article 13. 1 de l’Offence Act (Colombie-Britannique), le denonciateur declare croit vrais, au meileur de sa connaissance, les renseignements contenus dans la denonciation.
_______________Signed by Gordon S Watson _________________________ Signature of Informant / Signature du denonciateur
Dated / Fait le February 21st 2024 A. D.
At Victoria British Columbia / Colombie-Britannique
Process / Acte de procedure ________ confirmed
Signed by P Bray
_______________
A Justice of the Peace in and for the Province of British Columbia / Un juge de paix, dans et pour la province de la Colombie-Britannique
surface mail address : #4 5177 William Head Road Metchosin British Columbia V9C 4H5
As I’ve written before, the globalists have spent decades indoctrinating Westerners to believe that legitimate criticism of people with darker skin is a sign of racism, if not “proof” of so-called “white supremacy.” That includes speaking out against the epidemic of illegal immigrants, or asylum-seekers — call them what you will — committing unspeakable levels of sexual assault against Western women.
Most Americans have no idea what has been happening in Europe for two decades. But as I’ve warned in the past, the United States is only five to seven years behind the UK. Watch our Brit friends if you want to see what the pinkos have planned for “The Great Satan,” otherwise known as We the People.
Gang rapists in Britain, a vast majority of whom are/were Pakistani Muslims, had been sexually assaulting thousands of young girls and women with near impunity. How was such a heinous, nationwide calamity allowed to take place? Once the “woke” British cops realized most of the rapists were Muslims, they tucked their cowardly tails between their smooth, Ken-doll legs and said nothing for fear of being called “racists.”
When it comes to an alarming and fairly secret wave of crimes being committed by “diversity delegates,” England isn’t alone. Danish crime stats from 2010-2021 revealed the dirty little secret that “asylum seekers” committed far more crimes than citizens born in Denmark. Roughly 58% of the sexual assaults in Malmo, Sweden, considered the “rape capital” of Europe, were committed by minority “foreign-born” attackers.
FACT-O-RAMA! Gropey Joe Biden referred to Laken Riley’s murderer as an “illegal.” Realizing his faux pas, he apologized to the woke gods for his insolence, claiming he should have referred to the animal as “undocumented.”
Merely being quiet about the tens of thousands of Western women being raped seems not to be working anymore, so the globalists allowing the carnage have begun punishing those who speak out.
A German politician, Marie-Thérèse Kaiser, was recently fined nearly $6,500 for speaking out against the gruesome number of rapes committed against German women by Afghanis as per some recent crime statistics.
A German court decided that Fraulein Kaiser, 27, was guilty of “inciting hatred” for mentioning the high number of sexual attacks committed by Afghani “cultural enhancers,” especially gang rapes.
FACT-O-RAMA! In an infamous gang rape trial in Germany, nine men, mostly “asylum seekers,” were convicted of repeatedly gang-raping a 15-year-old girl in a park. Ninety-six witnesses testified. Only one of the animals was sent to prison, for a mere two years and nine months. The others received suspended sentences.
In other words, a German woman was punished for quoting rape-related crime stats that the globalists want to keep secret. Even Elon Musk chimed in.
Deeming Westerners “racist” if they take notice of a culture in which people are more likely to rape, among other things, is ludicrous. But as I wrote earlier, “woke” social conditioning works on people desperate to feel good about themselves.
But now, scaring people into silence is no longer working, so the woke backlash has begun.
Whether this judge is Geisteskrank oder ein Sitzpinkler is unknown, but if he/she/zhe thinks he is immune to the millions of invaders who hate Westerners, he may find that the boot of reality moves swiftly to the crotch.
I know leftists in the U.S. who, astoundingly, seem to believe that a BLM sticker on their Prius makes them impervious to Marxist atrocities. Trust me, that Biden sign on your lib-in-law’s lawn won’t help when the gluten-dodging sallies of Antifa come out of their gated homes to throw their election-year tantrums. If you believe it will, I’d like to sell you “Reinhart,” my invisible Wasserspeier who will guard you from the communist mobs currently training to burn down our nation’s big, blue cities this summer.
David Lindsay’s Appeal Heard in Kelowna Today, Adjourned
David Lindsay’s Appeal Heard in Kelowna Today, Adjourned
Conviction Appeal Hearing Today in Kelowna I appeared before Justice Kent today in relation to my appeal from the conviction on assault. As expected, it was adjourned to July 22, 2024 at 10:00 a.m. to await the outcome of the sentencing hearing in the Provincial Court. Crown Persecutor Grabavac, appearing on another matter as well, referred to one judge as “the old judge”! This really caught the judge’s attention today, and he rhetorically said: “You’re saying the old judge”, which resulted in a lot of snickers amongst the public and other lawyers. Grabavac had to immediately back track and clarify he did not mean what he said. Interesting judge today for sure. I suspect on July 22, that we will discuss when to hear my Jordan (delay) appeal first and set a hearing date for that appeal. Keeping you updated as we move along. In freedom David Unsubscribe | Manage your subscription | View online
We are almost a quarter of a century into the third millennium Anno Domini. In that period the alphabet soup – LGBTTQAEIOUandsometimesY – gang has grown accustomed to getting whatever it demands, no matter how ludicrous, absurd, or even downright insane, the demand happens to be. This is true in general across the civilization formerly known as Christendom but nowhere more so than here in the Dominion of Canada. It has been especially true here for the last nine years since Captain Airhead became the creepiest little low-life sleazebag ever to disgrace the office of the first minister of His Majesty’s government in Ottawa. Captain Airhead has aggressively promoted the craziest, most fringe, and least defensible elements of the alphabet soup agenda as if they were commonsensical, had the weight of universally recognized moral truth behind them, and could be opposed only by knuckle-dragging moral reprobates. If knuckle-dragging moral reprobation is what is required to oppose such things then Captain Airhead ought to be leading the opposition. He was never able to add two and two together and come up with four, however. Just look at his budgets.
One consequence of Captain Airhead’s alphabet soup policies has been a sharp decline in average intelligence in the country. We might call this the Trudeau Effect. It is the opposite of the Flynn Effect, the psychometric phenomenon named after James Flynn by Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein in The Bell Curve (1994) that was the reason standardized IQ tests needed to be revised, updated, and recalibrated periodically to prevent the average from running significantly over 100. The Trudeau Effect is when, due to constant government-backed gas-lighting and bullying, intelligence so declines that people no longer understand the difference between what is true in reality and what someone mistakenly thinks or imagines to be true. Before Captain Airhead we could say in response to those pushing the trans part of the alphabet soup agenda that we don’t accept that the person who thinks he is a chicken actually is a chicken, we don’t accept that the person who thinks he is Napoleon Bonaparte actually is who he thinks he is, and neither should we accept that the boy who thinks he is a girl is a girl or that the girl who thinks she is a boy is a boy. Today, not only do fewer and fewer people understand this, the aggressive promotion of the trans agenda has brought us to the point where there is now a demand that we regard people who think they are something other than people as being what they think or say they are.
This is why it has been rather encouraging over the last year or so to see a growing push back against this insanity. Most recently, Danielle Smith, the premier of Alberta, announced a new set of policies and upcoming legislation for her province that would restrict the genital and breast mutilation sickeningly called by such deranged euphemisms as gender-reassignment surgery or gender-affirming care to those who have reached the age of majority, ban puberty-blockers for those under the age of 16, require that parents be notified and give their consent when pervert teachers try to brainwash their kids into thinking they are the opposite sex/gender, require parental consent for sex education and that all sex ed curricula be approved by the minister of education, and prevent the sort of situation that Ray Stevens has hilariously lampooned in his new song “Since Bubba Changed His Name to Charlene”. In other words, policies and legislation that anyone who isn’t a total idiot, insane, under the influence of an evil spirit or a substance that turns one’s mind to goo or both, evil on a megalomaniacal scale, or some combination of these, could and would support. Needless to say, both Captain Airhead and Jimmy Dhaliwal, the supervillain who somehow broke out of the cartoon universe and into our own and having been denied entry to India due to his connections to the extremists who want to break that country up opted to become the leader of the socialist party here, have been having conniptions over this.
Most news media commentators have joined the whacko politicians like Airhead and Dhaliwal in howling in outrage over what could be best described as the very, bare bones, minimum of a sensible provincial policy towards alphabet soup gender politics. This will not come as a shock to many, I suspect. Canadian newspapers have acted as if their role was to propagate the ideas of and bolster support for the Liberal Party since at least the time when John Wesley Defoe edited the Winnipeg Free Press. Arguably it goes back even further to when George Brown edited the Toronto Globe, the predecessor of today’s Globe and Mail. That the new technological means of mass communication seemed designed to project a distorted view of reality that served the interests of some ideological vision of progress rather than of truth was a critique made by such varied observers as the American Richard M. Weaver, the French Jacques Ellul, and the Canadian Marshall McLuhan. It was radio, television, and the motion picture industry that these men had in mind. The second revolution in mass communications technology that gave us the internet, smartphones, social media, and streaming services has since eclipsed the first. It has not rectified the problem those astute social critics and technosceptics saw in the earlier mass communications media any more than Captain Airhead’s bailout of the struggling Canadian newspapers solved the problem of their heavy bias towards the Liberal Party but rather, in both instances, the problem was exponentially magnified.
John Ibbitson wrote a piece that argued that Smith’s policies were endangering all teenagers in Alberta. Naturally, the Globe and Mail had the poor taste to publish it. The obvious reality is that no teenagers – or anybody else for that matter – are endangered by Smith’s policies. Max Fawcett, the lead columnist for Canada’s National Observer, attempted to argue that Smith, who has long been identified with the libertarian wing of Canadian conservatism, has betrayed her ideology. As Pierre Poilievre, the current leader of His Majesty’s Loyal Opposition, the Conservative Party, pointed out, however, when he – finally – took a stand in favour what Smith was doing, prohibiting people from making irreversible, life-altering, decisions while they are children means protecting their right to make adult choices as adults. That is hardly something that could be described as irreconcilably out of sync with libertarian ideals As an indicator of just how cuckoo most of the media reporting on this has been, Ibbitson’s and Fawcett’s are among the saner of the anti-Smith pieces that have appeared.
Poilievre also predicted that Captain Airhead will eventually have to back down on this issue. I certainly hope that he is right about that and that soon we will have the pleasure of watching Captain Airhead eat his own words. In the meantime, it is good to see that a rational, sane, pushback against the alphabet soup madness has finally begun. Let us hope and pray that it continues and spreads. — Gerry T. Neal
CitizenGO started this petition to Ambassador Norton and Delegates of the 10th INB Session – 2024/04/30
The battle against the WHO Pandemic Treaty has entered its critical final phase.
Right now, the WHO’s Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) is engaged in an emergency session in Geneva, convened to ram through the UN Pandemic Treaty before the World Health Assembly on May 27th.
The decisions made during this meeting could permanently shift the balance of power, granting global elites unprecedented control over your personal health choices.
For nearly two years, you and I have battled relentlessly against this huge threat to our cherished liberties. This treaty, driven by the globalists controlling the WHO, seeks to enforce mandates on your health, your movement, and your life under the guise of public safety.
The pandemic may be over, but the push for this pandemic treaty continues.
Why? Because it’s not about health—it’s about control.
This treaty is about making you a mere subject under a global power that dictates parts of your everyday life—forcing lockdowns, crippling our economies, and curtailing our fundamental freedoms.
The treaty’s language has shifted dramatically, moving from suggestive guidelines to compulsory mandates.
And there is significant escalation towards a legally binding framework that would strip away national sovereignty and individual rights, consolidating power in the hands of a few funded with millions and millions of your tax money.
Sign the petition now to demand that Canada’s ambassador reject the WHO Pandemic Treaty. Stand with us to send a clear message that this treaty must not pass.
Add your voice to the millions demanding an end to this power grab. Your participation is vital in showing that you will not stand by as your rights are negotiated away in closed-door meetings.
Join the fight. Help us make a decisive stand against the Pandemic Treaty and protect the individual freedoms of citizens across the globe.
This could indeed be our last chance to change the outcome. Do not let this moment pass without taking action. Your signature today could change the course of history.
The sign posted by Councillor John Robertson, which is posted saying “Truth: Mass Graves Hoax, Reconciliation: Redeem Sir John A’s Integrity.” (Courtesy: Gregory Miller)
CitizenGO started this petition to Ambassador Norton and Delegates of the 10th INB Session – 2024/04/30
