Anti-Democratic NDP Won’t Even Approve Traditional First Reading of Bill to Abolish Fanatical B.C. Human Rights Tribunal

Kelowna MLA’s bill to repeal BC Human Rights Code quickly voted down

Another Armstrong bill fails

Colin Dacre – Feb 26, 2026 / 1:22 pm | Story: 600905

Tara Armstrong in the BC Legislature on Thursday.

Photo: BC Legislative Assembly

Tara Armstrong in the BC Legislature on Thursday.

Another bill from Kelowna-area MLA Tara Armstrong has been voted down at the earliest possible opportunity.

Armstrong, independent MLA for Kelowna-Lake Country-Coldstream, tabled the Human Rights Code Repeal Act Thursday in the legislature.

“The purpose of this bill is to end the assault on freedom of speech by our human rights tribunal,” she said.

Armstrong’s bill was motivated by a recent $750,000 fine issued by the BC Human Rights Tribunal against former Chilliwack school trustee Barry Neufeld over his comments about LGBTQ people.

The ruling came after the BC Teachers’ Federation and Chilliwack Teachers’ Association filed the human rights complaint against Neufeld in 2017 on behalf of their members, specifically those who identified as LGBTQ from October 2017 through 2022.

They sought $750,000 to be distributed equally among those members, and the decision says the tribunal was satisfied the award was appropriate.

Armstrong, on Thursday, said the repeal of the BC Human Rights Code “is the only solution to this assault on our rights.”

“This bill will protect the freedom of speech of Canadians. It will abolish the Human Rights Tribunal, a kangaroo court, and repeal the Human Rights Code that the left is using to punish and profit from anyone who doesn’t adopt their views.”

Like several bills proposed by Armstrong so far, it was dead-on-arrival in the legislature and was voted down at first reading with 50 votes opposed and 37 in favour. The BC Conservative caucus voted in support.

First reading politicized

Legislation has traditionally been granted first reading in the house as a courtesy to encourage debate. Conservative MLA for Kamloops-North Thompson Ward Stamer, after his party voted in support of Armstrong’s bill last week to ban youth gender transitions, told Castanet News his party has decided to continue that practice in an effort to avoid the “politicization” of first reading and allow the public to see bills.

In a news release Thursday after the vote, the BC NDP acknowledged “it is rare to vote against bills at first reading,” but pointed to other issues—like a ban on land acknowledgements or to cancel the stat holiday for the National Day for Truth and Reconciliation—that the Conservatives voted against at first reading.(Castanet, February 26, 2026)

The BC Human Rights’ Tribunal’s Hetero-Hating, Christian-hating, Censorship-loving Rulings Have Cost Vancouver  Visit By Comedian John Cleese

The BC Human Rights’ Tribunal’s Hetero-Hating, Christian-hating, Censorship-loving Rulings Have Cost Vancouver  Visit By Comedian John Cleese

John Cleese is among the most gifted comic writers and actors of the late 20th Century. After last week’s hideous $750,000 penalty meted out to former school trustee Barry Neufeld for challenging the SOGI gender-bending school sex-education curriculum. The brutal penalty was assessed against an 80-year old man living on his pension in a 40-year old trailer with his 1990s car.
John Cleese, who, like Mr. Neufeld, believes that there are two sexes — man and woman — loves Vancouver but doesn’t want to risk persecution by the human rights STASI. Cleese said: “I won’t be able to risk doing any shows in British Columbia. ….Cleese has previously mocked the policy of self-identified gender. In 2020, he wrote in a social media post “deep down, I want to be a Cambodian police woman. Is that allowed, or am I being unrealistic?”

John Cleese says he’s now avoiding B.C. because of crackdown on gender ideology criticism

B.C. Human Rights Tribunal cases have been brought against non-citizens such as Cleese, and also against comedians making comments as part of a performance

John Cleese.
Actor-comedian John Cleese speaks to fans during the Calgary Expo in Calgary in April 2022. Photo by Darren Makowichuk/Postmedia

British comedy elder John Cleese has announced that he will be steering clear of British Columbia on an upcoming Canadian tour, owing to fears that he will be prosecuted for non-adherence to gender ideology.

Cleese, 86, made the declaration in a Saturday social media post issued in response to a $750,000 fine being imposed on a former Chilliwack, B.C. school trustee who refuses to believe that gender is a “social construct.”

“What a pity! I’m arranging a theatrical tour of Canada this Fall, and now I won’t be able to risk doing any shows in British Columbia,” wrote Cleese, adding, “I was really looking forward to coming.”

In a Feb. 18 ruling by the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal, former trustee Barry Neufeld was ordered to pay $750,000 to an unnamed consortium of transgender teachers because he had publicly questioned the province’s policy that an individual’s gender is whatever he or she declares it to be.

The 143-page decision specified that one of Neufeld’s chief violations was his stated belief that “separating gender identity from assigned biological sex is a fiction and an ‘ideology’ to be opposed.”

As such, Neufeld was declared to have engaged in “extremely serious and damaging” speech, as well as transgender “erasure.”

A long-serving trustee for the Chilliwack School District, Neufeld had been an early public critic of efforts to enshrine gender identity within the B.C. school curriculum. It’s for that reason that his case before the tribunal was brought by the B.C. Teachers Federation.

But the decision was not limited to Neufeld’s actions as a trustee. Under the terms of the decision, anyone in B.C. could presumably face similar sanction under the B.C. Human Rights Code for echoing the same views as Neufeld.

“A person does not need to believe in Christianity to accept that another person is Christian. However, to accept that a person is transgender, one must accept that their gender identity is different than their sex assigned at birth,” the tribunal decision read.

Cleese has previously mocked the policy of self-identified gender. In 2020, he wrote in a social media post “deep down, I want to be a Cambodian police woman. Is that allowed, or am I being unrealistic?”

B.C. Human Rights Tribunal cases have been brought against non-citizens such as Cleese, and they’ve also been pursued against comedians making comments as part of a performance.

In 2011, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal ordered comedian Guy Earle to pay $15,000 to an audience member who had alleged “lasting physical and psychological effect” from her objection to his set.

Cleese is one of four surviving members of the legendary Monty Python sketch comedy troupe, and was the creator of the British sitcom Fawlty Towers.

B.C. has been a regular stop of his, particularly in recent years.

In 2013, he scheduled multiple sold-out Vancouver show dates as part of his Last Time To See Me Before I Die tour. In 2022, Vancouver was one of the stops on his An Evening of Exceptional Silliness tour.

“God I love this city,” he told CBC during a 2014 visit to Vancouver as part of a book tour. “It’s wonderful to have the sea around you… and wonderful Chinese food. It’s just a great place.” (National Post, February 25, 2026)

The BC Human Rights’ Tribunal’s Hetero-Hating, Christian-hating, Censorship-loving Rulings Have Cost Vancouver  Visit By Comedian John Cleese

John Cleese is among the most gifted comic writers and actors of the late 20th Century. After last week’s hideous $750,000 penalty meted out to former school trustee Barry Neufeld for challenging the SODI gender-bending school sex-education curriculum. The brutal penalty was assessed against an 80-year old man living on his pension in a 40-year old trailer with his 1990s car.
John Cleese, who, like Mr. Neufeld, believes that there are two sexes — man and woman — loves Vancouver but doesn’t want to risk persecution by the human rights STASI. Cleese said: “I won’t be able to risk doing any shows in British Columbia. ….Cleese has previously mocked the policy of self-identified gender. In 2020, he wrote in a social media post “deep down, I want to be a Cambodian police woman. Is that allowed, or am I being unrealistic?”

John Cleese says he’s now avoiding B.C. because of crackdown on gender ideology criticism

B.C. Human Rights Tribunal cases have been brought against non-citizens such as Cleese, and also against comedians making comments as part of a performance

John Cleese.
Actor-comedian John Cleese speaks to fans during the Calgary Expo in Calgary in April 2022. Photo by Darren Makowichuk/Postmedia

British comedy elder John Cleese has announced that he will be steering clear of British Columbia on an upcoming Canadian tour, owing to fears that he will be prosecuted for non-adherence to gender ideology.

Cleese, 86, made the declaration in a Saturday social media post issued in response to a $750,000 fine being imposed on a former Chilliwack, B.C. school trustee who refuses to believe that gender is a “social construct.”

“What a pity! I’m arranging a theatrical tour of Canada this Fall, and now I won’t be able to risk doing any shows in British Columbia,” wrote Cleese, adding, “I was really looking forward to coming.”

In a Feb. 18 ruling by the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal, former trustee Barry Neufeld was ordered to pay $750,000 to an unnamed consortium of transgender teachers because he had publicly questioned the province’s policy that an individual’s gender is whatever he or she declares it to be.

The 143-page decision specified that one of Neufeld’s chief violations was his stated belief that “separating gender identity from assigned biological sex is a fiction and an ‘ideology’ to be opposed.”

As such, Neufeld was declared to have engaged in “extremely serious and damaging” speech, as well as transgender “erasure.”

A long-serving trustee for the Chilliwack School District, Neufeld had been an early public critic of efforts to enshrine gender identity within the B.C. school curriculum. It’s for that reason that his case before the tribunal was brought by the B.C. Teachers Federation.

But the decision was not limited to Neufeld’s actions as a trustee. Under the terms of the decision, anyone in B.C. could presumably face similar sanction under the B.C. Human Rights Code for echoing the same views as Neufeld.

“A person does not need to believe in Christianity to accept that another person is Christian. However, to accept that a person is transgender, one must accept that their gender identity is different than their sex assigned at birth,” the tribunal decision read.

Cleese has previously mocked the policy of self-identified gender. In 2020, he wrote in a social media post “deep down, I want to be a Cambodian police woman. Is that allowed, or am I being unrealistic?”

B.C. Human Rights Tribunal cases have been brought against non-citizens such as Cleese, and they’ve also been pursued against comedians making comments as part of a performance.

In 2011, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal ordered comedian Guy Earle to pay $15,000 to an audience member who had alleged “lasting physical and psychological effect” from her objection to his set.

Cleese is one of four surviving members of the legendary Monty Python sketch comedy troupe, and was the creator of the British sitcom Fawlty Towers.

B.C. has been a regular stop of his, particularly in recent years.

In 2013, he scheduled multiple sold-out Vancouver show dates as part of his Last Time To See Me Before I Die tour. In 2022, Vancouver was one of the stops on his An Evening of Exceptional Silliness tour.

“God I love this city,” he told CBC during a 2014 visit to Vancouver as part of a book tour. “It’s wonderful to have the sea around you… and wonderful Chinese food. It’s just a great place.” (National Post, February 25, 2026)

Lisa Bildy: Human rights rules on gender ideology are just blasphemy laws https://

Lisa Bildy: Human rights rules on gender ideology are just blasphemy laws

$750,000 fine proves human rights tribunals cannot be saved

B.C. human rights
B.C. Human Rights Tribunal / file photo Vancouver Sun

Last week, the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal ordered Barry Neufeld, a former school board trustee, to pay $750,000. Neufeld had boldly criticized curriculum for young children that embedded gender ideology. LGBTQ teachers in the Chilliwack school board, who make up about 16 per cent of the staff, will get the money. Blasphemy laws have returned to Canada.

They don’t resemble the blasphemy laws of old. Through much of history, the state’s powers were used to punish challengers to the religious orthodoxy of the day. The Enlightenment’s focus on individual liberties hastened their decline in Western societies. For a time, freedom of speech, thought, and religion were seen as antidotes to oppressively enforced beliefs.

Oppressively enforced beliefs are back. But those beliefs don’t emanate from pulpits. It’s no longer Christianity demanding adherence to beliefs, but the secular religion of social justice. Neufeld learned the hard way that gender identity is now an unquestionable tenet of this new faith. Human rights tribunals are its enforcers under the guise of punishing “discrimination.” The curriculum he criticized, introduced in 2016, roughly coincided with “gender identity” becoming a protected class under human rights codes across Canada.

Traditionally, discrimination meant denying access to services, employment, or accommodation based on immutable qualities. Now, human rights tribunals use state power to enforce progressive dogma.

This shift is not entirely new. In 2006, publisher Ezra Levant faced a discrimination complaint for reprinting the Danish cartoons of Mohammed. He and Mark Steyn, who faced similar complaints for commentary on Islam published in Maclean’s magazine, drew attention to tribunal overreach, leading to the repeal of section 13 of the Canada Human Rights Act, which had empowered the tribunal to punish “hate speech.” But section 13’s proponents are becoming emboldened again. Court decisions rendered in the interim have only encouraged them.

Neufeld’s case, under provincial human rights law, is the kind you would expect under the federal Online Harms Bill, introduced by the previous Liberal government and floated again by the current government. It proposes to restore those hate speech enforcement powers to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. Under this bill, individuals who feel “harmed” by online speech would have the power to drag the speaker through a costly, multi-year process, at no cost to themselves. But that’s obviously already happening, at least in British Columbia. In an interim decision in Neufeld’s case, B.C.’s Human Rights Tribunal decided that, although previous decisions of the tribunal had found otherwise, it actually does have the power to regulate online posts under its existing legislation. Other provinces have similar legislative powers.

  1. t

Those who follow free speech cases are no longer surprised by such decisions. Over the past two decades, courts, governments, and tribunals have expanded the limits on free expression, rarely reinforcing broad conceptions of this fundamental freedom. The balancing act is often couched in phrases like, “Free speech is sacrosanct in our democracy, but of course there are limits …”

This case expands limits on freedom of expression in two significant ways. First, disparaging gender ideology — even when targeting ideas, not people — was found to be discriminatory. B.C.’s human rights commissioner argued that’s the way it should be. Excluding opinions on matters of “legitimate public interest” from the tribunal’s authority, she argued, created a loophole that should be closed. Mark Steyn avoided punishment for his commentary on Islam, also litigated in B.C., because it was considered political commentary within the bounds of free expression. Today’s human rights functionaries won’t abide such limits on their power.

Second, the expanded interpretation was applied to an elected trustee, whose role is to challenge policies and raise concerns about educational changes. Bureaucrats now dictate what elected officials can say on public policy matters.

The tribunal’s decision also included a passage chastising those who do not believe in gender identity, positing that failure to do so constitutes discriminatory “erasure” of transgender people. Expressing beliefs against gender identity — such as skepticism about changing one’s sex or concerns about males entering women’s spaces — may therefore be severely penalized if deemed “discriminatory” or “hateful” by the administrative state.

The $750,000 fine against Neufeld is unprecedented in the human rights context. While framed as compensation for “harm” to LGBTQ teachers, it was clearly intended to financially ruin him for his speech and refusal to embrace gender identity. It also serves as a warning to anyone considering criticism of the new faith. Blasphemy laws are back.

Public outrage is growing, and politicians are being pressured to act. Reining in these star chambers is no longer good enough. Legislatures must abolish them, along with the human rights codes that they enforce. That requires political backbone, so don’t hold your breath. Instead, call, write, or sign a petition like ours at the Free Speech Union to let your political leaders know how many Canadians oppose financial ruin for expressing opinions on issues affecting themselves and their children. (NATIONAL POST, February 26, 2026)

Lisa Bildy is a lawyer and executive director of the Free Speech Union of Canada. She can be found on X at @LDBildy. 

Committed Traditional Christian & Former School Trustee Barry Neufeld Fined A Crushing $750,000 By BC Human Rights Tribunal For Criticizing the LGBTQ Agenda

Committed Traditional Christian & Former School Trustee Barry Neufeld Fined A Crushing $750,000 By BC Human Rights Tribunal For Criticizing the LGBTQ Agenda

Committed Traditional Christian & Former School Trustee Barry Neufeld Fined A Crushing $750,000 By BC Human Rights Tribunal For Criticizing the LGBTQ Agenda[Since our beginning in 1983, CAFE has warned that one of the most sinister enemies of free speech and opinion are human rights commissions. The Charter’s weak guarantees of freedom of expression, belief and religion mean nothing to them. Infected with hatred for traditional Christians and obsessed with gender bending LGBTQ ideology, they tolerate no dissent from the LGBTQ agenda and punish dissenters with fines more in keeping with a shipping company guilty of an environment wrecking oil spill. The complaint against Neufeld was made by the B.C. Teachers’ Federation. There was a time when the teaching profession stood for free speech and inquiry. In B.C., the BCTF is committed to leftist indoctrination of their young charges and pushing the the radical, anti-Christian LGBTQ agenda. BCTF president Carole Gordon gloated at the victory and crowed:  ” The BCTF will always stand firmly in support of 2SLGBTQIA+ students, families, and teachers. Today’s outcome sends a clear message: inclusion and respect are not optional in British Columbia’s schools.” Dont let the touchy feely words “respect and inclusion” fool you. There’s no respect for traditional Christians in the BCTF’s opinions and, if you dissent from the LGBTQ agenda and the glorification of transgenderism, you will not be included. It’s our sincere hope that this totalitarian and vengefuldecision will be the subject of a judicial review (appeal).]

“A B.C. Human Rights Tribunal has released its decision against former trustee Barry Neufeld on Feb. 17, 2026. (Progress file)  A B.C. Human Rights Tribunal has released its decision against former trustee Barry Neufeld on Feb. 17, 2026. (Progress file)  Former Chilliwack school trustee Barry Neufeld has been ordered to pay $750,000 by the B.C. Human Rights Tribunal for violating the Human Rights Code with “heated public speech” exposing LGBTQ people to hatred or contempt.  The tribunal issued its final decision this week, issuing two sets of costs orders in the matter of the BCTF (on behalf of) the Chilliwack Teachers’ Association v. Neufeld, one ordering the payment of $750,000 in costs to the CTA, and a concurrent order of $10,000 for improper conduct during the lengthy process.  The decision finally rendered after years of deliberations determined that Neufeld violated sections 7(1)(a), (b), and 13 of the Human Rights Code and the orders constitute the remedies against him.


But more than the costs orders, the final decision on the hate speech pinpoints that the case before the Human Rights Tribunal ultimately asked its three members “to navigate the application of the Human Rights Code to heated public speech.”  They were referring to Neufeld’s language “that debates the rights and recognition of this protected group, in a context where transgender people in particular often find themselves disproportionately in the spotlight.”  They concluded that six of Neufeld’s publications could “expose gay, lesbian, and trans people to hatred or contempt based on their gender identity and/or sexual orientation. Viewed objectively and in context, these publications have the potential to lead to their discriminatory treatment. These publications violate s. 7(1)(b) of the Code.”  
One of his publications was a social media post on Dec. 18, 2017 in which Neufeld claimed he’d been “thrown into the role of a prophet: speaking out to the lawmakers in Victoria and trying to motivate lukewarm Christians who are sitting idly by as all of society ‘Slouches towards Gomorrah’.  He urged his followers to “push back” against the “powerful” LGBTQ+ lobby group and he labelled gender fluidity as “delusional thinking.”  In the lengthy post, Neufeld accused LGBTQ+ people of seeking priority status as “the most downtrodden of victims” and that “the many new categories that are included in the long list of letters now added after LGBTQ are a new ‘Caste system’.” 


  The post continued: “But the scary thing is that [promoting this gender bending theory] has already demonized people of faith who believe that God created humans male and female: In the Image of God. Here is my prophecy to the Church: If you don’t get off your duffs and push back against this insidious new teaching, the day is coming (maybe it is already here) when the government will apprehend your children and put them in homes where they will be encouraged to explore homosexuality and gender fluidity.”  


There were many other examples.  In their press release in reaction to the decision, the Chilliwack Teachers’ Association chronicles how the CTA and the BCTF initiated a human rights complaint against Neufeld, who was then serving as a Chilliwack School trustee, for the many public statements that “discriminated against 2SLGBTQIA+ teachers in Chilliwack and were likely to expose them to hatred or contempt.”  CTA president Reid Clark emphasized the importance of a discrimination-free workplace.  “This ruling recognizes the very real harm experienced by 2SLGBTQIA+ teachers in Chilliwack and reinforces that they have the right to work in an environment free from discrimination and fear,” Clark said. “We are hopeful that this ruling will lead to more inclusive working and learning environments for all 2SLGBTQIA+ folks in schools and beyond.”  


In the decision released Feb. 17, the tribunal found that Neufeld violated the Human Rights Code, stating: “For five years, Mr. Neufeld inundated public discourse in Chilliwack with speech that degraded and denied trans people, sought to eliminate public policies for their inclusion, and sounded alarms about an imaginary threat posed by their social acceptance.  “He spread misinformation and inflamed anti-LGBTQ animus in the district,” the reason said.  
The tribunal determined that school trustees have a role in upholding positive school environments and anti-discrimination policies. Instead, Neufeld’s numerous public posts, which “demonized and delegitimized trans people,” were likely to expose all LGBTQ to hatred or contempt based on their gender identity or sexual orientation.  Neufeld is described as “one of its loudest critics” after SOGI resources were introduced, and during his tenure as trustee, waged a “high profile public campaign against SOGI 123 and the values underlying it.”  The campaign was expressed in publications including social media posts, board meetings statements at rallies, and in online interviews, said the tribunal, in the reasons.  


Throughout Neufeld’s “publications,” that were reviewed, “30 of which formed the basis of the human rights complaint,” in at least six, the school trustee was sending out the message that SOGI 123 is a “weapon of propaganda” which threatens “traditional family values” and instructs children that “gender is not biologically determined, but a social construct.”  The BCTF release notes that SOGI 123 was launched during the 2017-2018 school year, as a set of tools and resources aimed at supporting an inclusive learning environment for all students. It provides information and resources for policies and procedures, creating inclusive environments, and functions as a classroom resource.  It’s not curriculum, nor is it mandatory for educators to use in their classrooms, they underlined. 


Rather it acknowledges the reality and existence of 2SLGBTQIA+ people, different family structures, and the fact that one’s gender may not be the same as the sex they were assigned at birth. It recognizes that teachers are equipped to determine what information is age-appropriate for their students.  In the tribunal was asked by the complainants to analyze, Neufeld attacked “each of these three pillars” of SOGI-inclusive education.  “In doing so, he repeatedly and publicly reaffirmed his intention to perform the duties of a school trustee in a way that discriminated against LGBTQ people, especially trans people,” the tribunal said. “In some publications, he expressly stated that he is using his position as a trustee to ‘speak out’ against SOGI-inclusive education before proceeding to do so in a discriminatory way. 


 “Even where not expressly stated, his intention is clear. Mr. Neufeld invoked negative and insidious stereotypes about LGBTQ people, especially trans people, which denied their inherent dignity and, in some cases, reflected the hallmarks of hate against them as a group.”  The decision underscores the impacts of the endless attacks on SOGI 123 and the risk for 2SLGBTQIA+ people who work with children, including teachers.  “Critically, the decision affirms that trans people exist—and that claiming to believe that gender identity is not separate from sex assigned at birth is a form of existential denial. This denial pushes the idea that trans people have an agenda rather than being just another demographic group,” the CTA said in their release.  ”As this decision illustrates, such terms can create the ‘conditions for discrimination and hatred to flourish,’ as the Tribunal found.”


 The complaint was heard by a panel of three members of the BC Human Rights Tribunal over several days in 2024 and 2025, concluding on May 21, 2025.  BCTF president Carole Gordon is calling it a “huge win” for human rights in the context of public education.  “Today’s decision is a huge win for 2SLGBTQIA+ rights. It affirms that discriminatory and hateful rhetoric has no place in our public education system – especially when it comes from someone entrusted with a leadership position.  “The ruling highlights the value of SOGI 123, an evidence-based teaching resource for reducing discrimination-based harm. The BCTF will always stand firmly in support of 2SLGBTQIA+ students, families, and teachers. Today’s outcome sends a clear message: inclusion and respect are not optional in British Columbia’s schools.” (Chilliwack News, February 20, 2025)


The ruling will allow a number of LGBTQ teachers in the Board to cash in at Mr. Neufeld’s expense. The CBC (February 20, 2026) reported:  “The BCTF and Chilliwack Teachers’ Association sought an award of $750,000 in compensation to teachers’ association members who identify as LGBTQ between October 2017 through 2022 for injury to their dignity, feelings and self-respect.

The tribunal agreed with the award, saying Neufeld “poisoned” the workplace with anti-2SLGBTQ+ discrimination.

The tribunal said the $750,000 will result in individual awards between around $4,600 to $16,667 per class member, according to the decision.”

Public Official Tells the Truth About BC Education Madness – Media Crucifies Him

“Those whom God wishes to destroy, he first makes mad.”
– Euripides

Public Official Tells the Truth About BC Education Madness – Media Crucifies Him

A quick report by Francis Marion of Canadiangunblog.com
A school board trustee in British Columbia made the following post on his Facebook page a day or two ago.
The media here have gone ape-shit over it. Every major Canadian news outlet is running the story over and over on television and on their websites. The problem is, at least online, people by and large are standing up for the guy and either supporting his right to free speech or defending his position in its entirety.
The MSM is not taking it well. I tried to post a comment on the CBC’s page covering the story but the comments section is now locked down and will not accept more entries.
The Marxist narrative and brainwashing campaign that is being waged on the Western world is losing its grip on many people.  The West isn’t finished yet.