JUDY FOOTE — RESCIND POLICE STATE PROHIBITORY ORDER — LOSS OF MAILING RIGHTS — FOR EDITOR AND PUBLISHER OF YOUR WARD NEWS

JUDY FOOTE — RESCIND POLICE STATE PROHIBITORY ORDER — LOSS OF MAILING RIGHTS — FOR EDITOR AND PUBLISHER OF YOUR WARD NEWS

Here is my letter on behalf of CAFE to Public Services Minister Judy Foote — in charge of Canada Post. Please mail, FAX or e-mail her your own view supporting Dr. James Sears’ right to freedom of speech. Her contact information is at the bottom of this letter.

I have also included the e-mails of all MPs. You might wish to bcc them a copy of your letter.

Paul Fromm,

Director

CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION

Canadian Association for Free Expression

Box 332,

Rexdale, Ontario, M9W 5L3

Ph: 905-566-4455; FAX: 905-566-4820

Website: http://cafe.nfshost.com

Paul Fromm, B.Ed, M.A. Director

 

June 7, 2016

 

The Hon. Judy Foote,

Minister of Public Services,

House of Commons,

Ottawa, ON.,

K1A 2A6

 

Dear Ms Foote:

 

I was appalled to learn that you have served YOUR WARD NEWS editor Dr. James Swears and publisher Leroy St. Germaine.

 

The Interim Prohibitory Order makes the editor and publishers non-persons. They may neither send nor receive mail,

 

The relevant section of the Canada Post Corporation Act states:

(3) Subject to subsection (4), while an interim or final prohibitory order is in effect, the Minister may

  • (a)detain or return to the sender any mail addressed to, or anything posted by, the person affected;

This totalitarian penalty is imposed because, on “reasonable grounds” , the Minister believes YOUR WARD NEWS is violating Sec. 319 (“hate law”) or the defamatory libel section 300.

 

However, no such charges have been laid against YOUR WARD NEWS, and, needless to say, no convictions registered,

 

Furthermore, even if there had been convictions for previous issues, each issue of the paper is different. I think Sec. 43-46 of the Act over-reach and, in this instance, deny the victims natural justice.

 

Canada Post must not act as a censor. The Interim Prohibitory Order violates the principles of English Common law where one is presumed INNOCENT, until PROVEN guilty. YOUR WARD NEWS is brash and satirical. It gores sacred cows and upsets many. That’s freedom of speech. Outraged people who don’t like it should chuck it in the garbage.

 

There should be no right in Canada not to be offended.

 

Hoping that you will rethink, stand up to the thought-police lobby and rescind this order, I remain,

 

Sincerely yours,

 

 

 

Paul Fromm

Director

CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION

HON. JUDY FOOTE, Minister of Public Service

11 Laurier Street Place du Portage, Phase III, Floor 18A1 Gatineau, Quebec K1A 0S5 minister@pwgsc.gc.ca

House of CommonsOttawa, OntarioCanadaK1A 0A6Telephone: 613-992-8655

Fax: 613-992-5324

Ziad.Aboultaif@parl.gc.ca,
Dan.Albas@parl.gc.ca,
harold.albrecht@parl.gc.ca,
John.Aldag@parl.gc.ca,
Omar.Alghabra@parl.gc.ca,
Leona.Alleslev@parl.gc.ca
dean.allison@parl.gc.ca,
rona.ambrose@parl.gc.ca,
William.Amos@parl.gc.ca,
Gary.Anand@parl.gc.ca,
david.anderson@parl.gc.ca,
charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca,
Mel.Arnold@parl.gc.ca,
Rene.Arseneault@parl.gc.ca,
Chandra.Arya@parl.gc.ca,
niki.ashton@parl.gc.ca,
Robert.Aubin@parl.gc.ca,
Ramez.Ayoub@parl.gc.ca,
Vance.Badawey@parl.gc.ca,
Larry.Bagnell@parl.gc.ca,
Navdeep.Bains@parl.gc.ca,
John.Barlow@parl.gc.ca,
Xavier.Barsalou-Duval@parl.gc.ca,
Frank.Baylis@parl.gc.ca,
Mario.Beaulieu@parl.gc.ca,
Terry.Beech@parl.gc.ca,
mauril.belanger@parl.gc.ca,
carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca,
Sheri.Benson@parl.gc.ca,
candice.bergen@parl.gc.ca,
maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca,
Luc.Berthold@parl.gc.ca,
james.bezan@parl.gc.ca,
Marie-Claude.Bibeau@parl.gc.ca,
Chris.Bittle@parl.gc.ca,
Daniel.Blaikie@parl.gc.ca,
Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca,
Rachel.Blaney@parl.gc.ca,
steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca,
kelly.block@parl.gc.ca,
Randy.Boissonnault@parl.gc.ca,
Mike.Bossio@parl.gc.ca,
Sylvie.Boucher@parl.gc.ca,
Michel.Boudrias@parl.gc.ca,
Alexandre.Boulerice@parl.gc.ca,
Marjolaine.Boutin-Sweet@parl.gc.ca,
John.Brassard@parl.gc.ca,
Bob.Bratina@parl.gc.ca,
Pierre.Breton@parl.gc.ca,
scott.brison@parl.gc.ca,
RuthEllen.Brosseau@parl.gc.ca,
gord.brown@parl.gc.ca,
Celina.Caesar-Chavannes@parl.gc.ca,
blaine.calkins@parl.gc.ca,
Richard.Cannings@parl.gc.ca,
Guy.Caron@parl.gc.ca,
Jim.Carr@parl.gc.ca,
colin.carrie@parl.gc.ca,
Bill.Casey@parl.gc.ca,
Sean.Casey@parl.gc.ca,
Bardish.Chagger@parl.gc.ca,
Francois-Philippe.Champagne@parl.gc.ca,
Arnold.Chan@parl.gc.ca,
Shaun.Chen@parl.gc.ca,
michael.chong@parl.gc.ca,
Francois.Choquette@parl.gc.ca,
david.christopherson@parl.gc.ca,
Alupa.Clarke@parl.gc.ca,
tony.clement@parl.gc.ca,
Michael.Cooper@parl.gc.ca,
Serge.Cormier@parl.gc.ca,
nathan.cullen@parl.gc.ca,
rodger.cuzner@parl.gc.ca,
Julie.Dabrusin@parl.gc.ca,
Pam.Damoff@parl.gc.ca,
don.davies@parl.gc.ca,
Matt.DeCourcey@parl.gc.ca,
Gerard.Deltell@parl.gc.ca,
Sukh.Dhaliwal@parl.gc.ca,
Anju.Dhillon@parl.gc.ca,
Nicola.Diiorio@parl.gc.ca,
stephane.dion@parl.gc.ca,
Kerry.Diotte@parl.gc.ca,
Todd.Doherty@parl.gc.ca,
fin.donnelly@parl.gc.ca,
earl.dreeshen@parl.gc.ca,
Francis.Drouin@parl.gc.ca,
Matthew.Dube@parl.gc.ca,
Emmanuel.Dubourg@parl.gc.ca,
Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
Terry.Duguid@parl.gc.ca,
kirsty.duncan@parl.gc.ca,
linda.duncan@parl.gc.ca,
Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca,
Scott.Duvall@parl.gc.ca,
Julie.Dzerowicz@parl.gc.ca,
wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca,
Jim.Eglinski@parl.gc.ca,
Ali.Ehsassi@parl.gc.ca,
Faycal.El-Khoury@parl.gc.ca,
Neil.Ellis@parl.gc.ca,
Nathaniel.Erskine-Smith@parl.gc.ca,
mark.eyking@parl.gc.ca,
Doug.Eyolfson@parl.gc.ca,
Ted.Falk@parl.gc.ca,
ed.fast@parl.gc.ca,
Greg.Fergus@parl.gc.ca,
Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca,
diane.finley@parl.gc.ca,
Pat.Finnigan@parl.gc.ca,
Darren.Fisher@parl.gc.ca,
Peter.Fonseca@parl.gc.ca,
judy.foote@parl.gc.ca,
Rheal.Fortin@parl.gc.ca,
Peter.Fragiskatos@parl.gc.ca,
Colin.Fraser@parl.gc.ca,
Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca,
Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca,
hedy.fry@parl.gc.ca,
Stephen.Fuhr@parl.gc.ca,
cheryl.gallant@parl.gc.ca,
marc.garneau@parl.gc.ca,
Randall.Garrison@parl.gc.ca,
Bernard.Genereux@parl.gc.ca,
Garnett.Genuis@parl.gc.ca,
Mark.Gerretsen@parl.gc.ca,
Marilene.Gill@parl.gc.ca,
Marilyn.Gladu@parl.gc.ca,
Joel.Godin@parl.gc.ca,
Pam.Goldsmith-Jones@parl.gc.ca,
ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca,
Karina.Gould@parl.gc.ca,
jacques.gourde@parl.gc.ca,
David.Graham@parl.gc.ca,
Raj.Grewal@parl.gc.ca,
Patty.Hajdu@parl.gc.ca,
Cheryl.Hardcastle@parl.gc.ca,
Rachael.Harder@parl.gc.ca,
Ken.Hardie@parl.gc.ca,
stephen.harper@parl.gc.ca,
TJ.Harvey@parl.gc.ca,
Kent.Hehr@parl.gc.ca,
randy.hoback@parl.gc.ca,
Mark.Holland@parl.gc.ca,
Anthony.Housefather@parl.gc.ca,
carol.hughes@parl.gc.ca,
Ahmed.Hussen@parl.gc.ca,
Gudie.Hutchings@parl.gc.ca,
Angelo.Iacono@parl.gc.ca,
Matt.Jeneroux@parl.gc.ca,
Gord.Johns@parl.gc.ca,
Georgina.Jolibois@parl.gc.ca,
Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca,
Yvonne.Jones@parl.gc.ca,
Bernadette.Jordan@parl.gc.ca,
Majid.Jowhari@parl.gc.ca,
peter.julian@parl.gc.ca,
Darshan.Kang@parl.gc.ca,
Pat.Kelly@parl.gc.ca,
jason.kenney@parl.gc.ca,
peter.kent@parl.gc.ca,
Iqra.Khalid@parl.gc.ca,
Kamal.Khera@parl.gc.ca,
Robert.Kitchen@parl.gc.ca,
Tom.Kmiec@parl.gc.ca,
Jenny.Kwan@parl.gc.ca,
mike.lake@parl.gc.ca,
David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
kevin.lamoureux@parl.gc.ca,
Linda.Lapointe@parl.gc.ca,
guy.lauzon@parl.gc.ca,
Stephane.Lauzon@parl.gc.ca,
Helene.Laverdiere@parl.gc.ca,
denis.lebel@parl.gc.ca,
dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca,
Diane.Lebouthillier@parl.gc.ca,
Paul.Lefebvre@parl.gc.ca,
Kellie.Leitch@parl.gc.ca,
Denis.Lemieux@parl.gc.ca,
Andrew.Leslie@parl.gc.ca,
Michael.Levitt@parl.gc.ca,
Ron.Liepert@parl.gc.ca,
Joel.Lightbound@parl.gc.ca,
ben.lobb@parl.gc.ca,
Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca,
Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca,
Lloyd.Longfield@parl.gc.ca,
Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca,
tom.lukiwski@parl.gc.ca,
lawrence.macaulay@parl.gc.ca,
Alistair.MacGregor@parl.gc.ca,
dave.mackenzie@parl.gc.ca,
Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca,
Larry.Maguire@parl.gc.ca,
Sheila.Malcolmson@parl.gc.ca,
James.Maloney@parl.gc.ca,
Simon.Marcil@parl.gc.ca,
brian.masse@parl.gc.ca,
Remi.Masse@parl.gc.ca,
irene.mathyssen@parl.gc.ca,
Bryan.May@parl.gc.ca,
Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca,
john.mccallum@parl.gc.ca,
Kelly.McCauley@parl.gc.ca,
phil.mccoleman@parl.gc.ca,
Karen.McCrimmon@parl.gc.ca,
Ken.McDonald@parl.gc.ca,
david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca,
john.mckay@parl.gc.ca,
Catherine.McKenna@parl.gc.ca,
Ron.McKinnon@parl.gc.ca,
cathy.mcleod@parl.gc.ca,
Michael.McLeod@parl.gc.ca,
Alexandra.Mendes@parl.gc.ca,
Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca,
MaryAnn.Mihychuk@parl.gc.ca,
larry.miller@parl.gc.ca,
Marc.Miller@parl.gc.ca,
Maryam.Monsef@parl.gc.ca,
Christine.Moore@parl.gc.ca,
Bill.Morneau@parl.gc.ca,
Robert.Morrissey@parl.gc.ca,
thomas.mulcair@parl.gc.ca,
joyce.murray@parl.gc.ca,
Pierre.Nantel@parl.gc.ca,
Eva.Nassif@parl.gc.ca,
John.Nater@parl.gc.ca,
Bob.Nault@parl.gc.ca,
rob.nicholson@parl.gc.ca,
Alex.Nuttall@parl.gc.ca,
deepak.obhrai@parl.gc.ca,
Jennifer.OConnell@parl.gc.ca,
Rob.Oliphant@parl.gc.ca,
John.Oliver@parl.gc.ca,
Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca,
Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca,
robert.falcon@parl.gc.ca,
Denis.Paradis@parl.gc.ca,
Pierre.Paul-Hus@parl.gc.ca,
Monique.Pauze@parl.gc.ca,
Joe.Peschisolido@parl.gc.ca,
Kyle.Peterson@parl.gc.ca,
Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca,
Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca,
Michel.Picard@parl.gc.ca,
louis.plamondon@parl.gc.ca,
pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca,
Jean-Claude.Poissant@parl.gc.ca,
AnneMinh-Thu.Quach@parl.gc.ca,
Carla.Qualtrough@parl.gc.ca,
lisa.raitt@parl.gc.ca,
Tracey.Ramsey@parl.gc.ca,
Murray.Rankin@parl.gc.ca,
Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca,
Alain.Rayes@parl.gc.ca,
geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca,
scott.reid@parl.gc.ca,
Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca,
blake.richards@parl.gc.ca,
Jean.Rioux@parl.gc.ca,
gerry.ritz@parl.gc.ca,
Yves.Robillard@parl.gc.ca,
Pablo.Rodriguez@parl.gc.ca,
Sherry.Romanado@parl.gc.ca
Anthony.Rota@parl.gc.ca,
Kim.Rudd@parl.gc.ca,
Dan.Ruimy@parl.gc.ca,
Don.Rusnak@parl.gc.ca,
Romeo.Saganash@parl.gc.ca,
Ruby.Sahota@parl.gc.ca,
Raj.Saini@parl.gc.ca,
Harjit.Sajjan@parl.gc.ca,
Darrell.Samson@parl.gc.ca,
Ramesh.Sangha@parl.gc.ca,
Brigitte.Sansoucy@parl.gc.ca,
Randeep.Sarai@parl.gc.ca,
Bob.Saroya@parl.gc.ca,
francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca,
andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
Peter.Schiefke@parl.gc.ca,
Jamie.Schmale@parl.gc.ca,
Deb.Schulte@parl.gc.ca,
Marc.Serre@parl.gc.ca,
judy.sgro@parl.gc.ca,
Brenda.Shanahan@parl.gc.ca,
Terry.Sheehan@parl.gc.ca,
Martin.Shields@parl.gc.ca,
bev.shipley@parl.gc.ca,
Jati.Sidhu@parl.gc.ca,
Sonia.Sidhu@parl.gc.ca,
Gagan.Sikand@parl.gc.ca,
scott.simms@parl.gc.ca,
Amarjeet.Sohi@parl.gc.ca,
robert.sopuck@parl.gc.ca,
Francesco.Sorbara@parl.gc.ca,
kevin.sorenson@parl.gc.ca,
Sven.Spengemann@parl.gc.ca,
bruce.stanton@parl.gc.ca,
Gabriel.Ste-Marie@parl.gc.ca,
Wayne.Stetski@parl.gc.ca,
Kennedy.Stewart@parl.gc.ca,
Mark.Strahl@parl.gc.ca,
Shannon.Stubbs@parl.gc.ca,
david.sweet@parl.gc.ca,
Marwan.Tabbara@parl.gc.ca,
Geng.Tan@parl.gc.ca,
Filomena.Tassi@parl.gc.ca,
Luc.Theriault@parl.gc.ca,
david.tilson@parl.gc.ca,
Hunter.Tootoo@parl.gc.ca,
brad.trost@parl.gc.ca,
justin.trudeau@parl.gc.ca,
Karine.Trudel@parl.gc.ca,
dave.vankesteren@parl.gc.ca,
peter.vanloan@parl.gc.ca,
Dan.Vandal@parl.gc.ca,
Anita.Vandenbeld@parl.gc.ca,
Adam.Vaughan@parl.gc.ca,
Karen.Vecchio@parl.gc.ca,
Arnold.Viersen@parl.gc.ca,
Arif.Virani@parl.gc.ca,
Cathay.Wagantall@parl.gc.ca,
mark.warawa@parl.gc.ca,
chris.warkentin@parl.gc.ca,
Dianne.Watts@parl.gc.ca,
Kevin.Waugh@parl.gc.ca,
Len.Webber@parl.gc.ca,
Erin.Weir@parl.gc.ca,
Nick.Whalen@parl.gc.ca,
Jonathan.Wilkinson@parl.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca,
alice.wong@parl.gc.ca,
Borys.Wrzesnewskyj@parl.gc.ca,
Kate.Young@parl.gc.ca,
David.Yurdiga@parl.gc.ca,
Salma.Zahid@parl.gc.ca,
Bob.Zimmer@parl.gc.ca,

Welcome Back to Fort Mac — You’re Under Arrest

Political Prisoner Brad Love at work in the oilpatch

Political Prisoner Brad Love at work in the oilpatch

 
           Former political prisoner and citizen journalist Brad Love had only been back in Fort McMurray for four days and five (yes 5!) police squad cars pulled up to his apartment and burly RCMP officers put this dangerous letter writing under arrest for “harassment”. This part of years of real harassment perpetrated by the local Mounties on the outspoken Mr. Love.
 
           His latest crime? Heckling and getting into a verbal argument with a gang of cleanup workers, some Third Worlders, some students brought up from Edmonton and housed in a camp. “You guys are ruining the jobs market here. You are working for slave wages at $16 an hour, There are no jobs here for us,” he added. The workers surrounded his car.
 
 
Inline image 1
 
 
            Brad points out that, with the extremely high cost of living in Fort Mac, $16 an hour may seem like a good wage, “but you can’t pay rent or run a car on that.” The only way these temps can do it, it they are fed and housed in a camp and driven to the work projects.
 
            One of the people he shouted at snapped a picture of Brad and his car.
 
            In politically correct Canada, even many seemingly manly outdoor workers are feminized, pussyfied babies. A generation ago, a dispute like this might have been  settled with one side or the other throwing the finger and both parties walking away. Not today! Someone scuttled off to phone the Mounties about “inappropriate” comments — no threats of violence, mind you — by the voluble Mr. Love.
 
            Later that evening, five police cars pulled up to arrest and cuff the unarmed man with an opinion.
 
            Mr. Love was held for 21 hours. One might have expected “released on one’s own recognisance” for this non-violent charge. Mr. Love has been scrupulous in attending previous court hearings. Instead, a Justice of the Peace extorted $1,000 cash bail. “Outrageous,” spits Mr. Love in recounting the incident.
 
             On returning to his apartment, worried neighbours whispered to Mr. Love that his neighbourhood “had been crawling with cops” the previous evening and that the “RCMP had cordoned off neighbourhood streets and part of a highway” looking for the outspoken man.
 
              Mr. Love contrasts this fanatical diligence for going after a soft target — a man who writes and voices his views — with the RCMP’s spectacular failure to solve more than a dozen recent murders, mostly of Somalis, suspected on being in the drug trade.
             Politicians and news media  in Fort McMurray who don’t like being challenged have conspired to box Mr. Love in. When he has called to voice his views, they call the police. A parole condition is that he not contact any media or police to express his views. [This conditions was, incidentally, imposed in Canada, not North Korea!]
             What the police now seem to do is charge Mr. Love after any complaint. He’s out bail money and under the shadow of a charge for months. Then, frequently just before a trial where the ridiculous nature of the charge and the pattern of police harassment could be exposed, the charges are quietly withdrawn.
             As Mr. Love was sticking up for Fort McMurray’s many unemployed, he was advised by CAFE to approach the Alberta Federation of Labour for support and perhaps, legal assistance.
            Mr. Love was one of 80,000 Fort McMurray residents forced to evacuate the city after out-of-control forest fires menaced the entire cities and destroyed 2,400 homes, including the one Mr. Love lived in. “I got out with one suitcase and my car. I lost almost all my work clothes and tools and 10 years of memorabilia since I moved to Fort Mac,” he explains. He went first to Edmonton and then Lac Lebiche, all the while keeping in touch with old bosses in the  hopes of a job as the town rebuilds.
           Brad Love has the Protestant  work ethic on steroids. he is known as an indefatigable and hard weorker. As soon as he got the all clear, he lined up an apartment and returned Tuesday, June 7 to Fort Mac.
             Welcome home! You know you’re in Canada. You’er told to do your job (if you have one), pay your taxes, shut your mouth and not offer an opinion if it’s not politically correct.

 

Inheritance Rights Attacked: McCorkill Case Lost

Inheritance Rights Attacked: McCorkill Case Lost
 
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5eQ1634BmFI
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EaM3woqKqag
 
 
Paul Fromm explains how free speech and property rights took another hit at the hands of the Supreme Court of Canada in not hearing an appeal in the McCorkill inheritance and free speech case, which he discussed in previous videos with the host, Brian Ruhe. Paul is Director, Canadian Association for Free Expression and Winner of the George Orwell Free Speech Award, 1994.
 
 
 
 
Donations to offset CAFE’s legal costs can be sent by PayPal to
cafe.nfshost.com
 
Paul Fromm explains how they lost the McCorkill inheritance and free speech case, which he discussed in previous videos with the host, Brian Ruhe. Paul is Di…
YOUTUBE.COM

Donations to offset CAFE’s legal costs can be sent by PayPal to
cafe.nfshost.com

YOUR WARD NEWS APPLIES FOR REVIEW OF PROHIBITION ORDER

 

 

YOUR WARD NEWS APPLIES FOR REVIEW OF  PROHIBITION ORDER

Dear Minister Foote:

To ensure that there are witnesses to this correspondence, I have BCC’d
everyone involved in this matter or that should be involved, including
members of the media.  I have cc’d my Member of Parliament so that he
keeps on top of you to ensure you move on the matter expeditiously.  I
have also cc’d my Publisher so that you know I have his permission to act
on his and the paper’s behalf.  Anyone on this correspondence may share
any part of it.


Firstly, since you have issued the Orwellian order of prohibiting me and
my Publisher from using the mail even for personal correspondences (see
attached letter from you) we must correspond with you by email.
Furthermore, I have not been served with the attached letter as of yet; it
was forwarded to me by Canada Post a few hours ago, as a courtesy.  They
were kind enough to refund the almost $40K we had already paid for the
305,000 piece mailing of Your Ward News starting this week.  My letter
carrier came to my door with your letter today, but refused to give it to
me, saying that you had requested a “card” be issued, and I be made to
pick it up at the post office tomorrow (delay tactic).  I do not
understand why a letter signed by you on May 26, 2016, with a 10 day time
limitation on it, has still not been officially sent to me, causing me to
incur printing costs over the weekend that could have been avoided (if it
came even one business day earlier, our papers would not have gone to
press).  If Canada Post had not forwarded their copy to me today, I would
still be unaware of your treacherous violation of my free speech rights.

Secondly, as Editor-In-Chief of Your Ward News, I am officially
requesting, in writing, for a Board of Review of your illegal order
blocking distribution of Your Ward News.  You have violated the Charter of
Rights under multiple sections, and you should be ashamed of yourself!
You may communicate with me by email from this point forward as to when
the date of said hearing will take place.  To expedite matters, you can
download a copy of the latest edition of Your Ward News here, which as you
can see is perfectly legal and harmless (please pass along information
from page 2 on my wrestling debut in Montreal) …

http://YourWardNews.com

Thirdly, I am putting you on notice that you have libelled me and the
entire Your Ward News staff through the spreading criminal falsehoods
about us, by stating that you believe we are violating up to two sections
of the criminal code.  Furthermore, you have exacerbated said libel by
stating that we are criminals of the kind so heinous that we deserve even
our personal mailing rights stripped, with no trial … guilty until we
prove ourselves innocent.  I was not aware that Canada is now under
Napoleonic law.

Please advise me ASAP as to the date on which your “Board Of Review” will
take place, keeping in mind that if the Summer 2016 edition of Your Ward
News is not delivered ASAP, it will be stale-dated; and also keeping in
mind that we are now incurring daily storage costs for said order of
newspapers; and also keeping in mind that Canada Post has a monopoly on
delivery of mail to apartment mailboxes, and if we have not been convicted
of any crime, we will be seeking a court injunction to strike down Canada
Post’s monopoly, and have keys to said mail boxes issued to us so that we
may distribute said papers ourselves.

Please govern yourself accordingly!

EXPEL THE PARASITE!

Dr. James Sears
Founder and Leader
New Constitution Party of Canada

Hear Paul Fromm on STORMFRONT RADIO, Monday, June 13 10:00 a.m. e.s.t. — North Korea Light on Your Northern Border

Hear Paul Fromm on STORMFRONT RADIO, Monday, June  13 10:00 a.m. e.s.t. — North Korea Light on Your Northern Border

Listen live to Stormfront Radio with Don Black & Roy
co-hosts Paul Fromm and Don Advo. Followed by Dr. David Duke.

 
 
Inline image 1
 
 
Paul Fromm will reveal recent setbacks to free speech
 
* Supreme Court cancels McCorkill bequest to National Alliance
 
*  Editor and publisher of YOUR WARD NEWS — an anti-Zionist, anti-homosexual agenda, holocaust skeptic Toronto satirical newspaper — stripped of their right tro send or receive mail
 
*  Trust Fund Kid’s office orders Paul Fromm banned from Parliament Hill and press conference cancelled
 
 
 
http://www.renseradio.com/listenlive.htm

Catholic Cardinal in Spain facing hate crime charges for criticizing the homosexual empire and Europe’s open door immigration policy

Catholic Cardinal in Spain facing hate crime charges for criticizing the homosexual empire and Europe’s open door immigration policy

 
After Cardinal Antonio Cañizares of Valencia said “we have legislation contrary to the family, the action of political and social forces, with added movements and actions of the gay empire,” a coalition of militant homosexual (“LGBT”) groups charged him with hate crimes under Spanish law.
 
Crux • June 9, 2016
 
Criminal proceedings under hate speech laws have been initiated against a Spanish cardinal for his commentary on theories styling gender as a personal preference, in which he termed them “the most insidious ideology in the history of humanity,” and for his warnings against  a “gay empire.” The Spanish Network of Help to Refugees has filed a complaint against Cardinal Antonio Cañizares of Valencia for his remarks, made on May 13. Under Spanish law, such a charge is required to be investigated.
 
“The family is haunted today, in our culture, by an endless threat of serious difficulties, and this is not hidden from anyone,” Cañizares said in his May homily. “We have legislation contrary to the family, the action of political and social forces, with added movements and actions of the gay empire, of ideas such as radical feminism, or the most insidious of all, gender theory,” he said.  In Catholic circles, the term “gender theory” is used to describe the ideas of some scientists and cultural critics who argue that sexual differences between men and women are socially constructed rather than given in nature.
 
Soon after Cañizares spoke, a coalition of 55 pro-LGBT associations accused him of being homophobic, saying that his words “go beyond freedom of expression and can be considered hate crimes.”  One of these associations is Lambda, which unites Valencia’s LGBT community. They presented a formal complaint against Cañizares, a former prefect of the Vatican’s Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments. 
 
Fani Boronat, coordinator of Lambda, said that what they expect from the prelate now is for him, in a different homily, to make a “strong” declaration in favor of the LGBT community, supporting diversity, equality, and feminism. On Monday, the pro-migrant network initiated criminal proceedings, saying Cañizares’s words against gender theory constitute hate crimes, as do, in their eyes, statements he made about migrants last October.  At that time, Cañizares asked if all the migrants arriving to Europe from the Middle East and Africa were “clean wheat,” asking if it’d be possible that some of those arriving are in reality “Trojan horses.”
 
In a statement, the pro-migrant network said that Cañizares “is an ultra-conservative trying to subvert the constitutional order,” accusing him of nostalgia for “times when immigrants, gays, lesbians, bisexuals, transsexuals and women were subjected to the dictates of a society governed by the powers of the Catholic Church.”  They also say that in his opposition to open borders, the prelate was “aligning himself with neo-Fascist organizations” that “consider persons of other ethnicities or religious beliefs as dangerous and potentially criminal.” 
 
The network is a lobbying organization that advocates on behalf of migrants amid what is considered Europe’s worst refugee crisis since the Second World War. Critics, however, point out that it does not operate any refugee assistance center, while the diocese of Valencia under Cañizares’ command helped an estimated 40,000 migrants in 2015. Valencia is an autonomous community, currently the only Spanish region governed by Podemos, a left-wing populist party, through a coalition forged with Compromís, a leftist association, and IU-Valencia, a communist party.
 
Last week, the region’s government decided that students who receive a scholarship with public funding can’t use it in a private university, most of which are Catholic. They also ruled that medical students who attend private universities can’t perform their mandatory internships in public hospitals. Some legal experts believe the two decisions violate a concordat between Spain and the Vatican, which stipulates that students of Catholic institutions should be treated the same way as those of other universities.
 
The governor of Valencia, Ximo Puig, has denounced Cañizares’ statements, accusing him of “fomenting hatred” and claiming that “the whole world understands that each person can love whom he wants.” Puig’s vice-president, Monica Oltra, likewise accused the cardinal of being a “misogynist,” and sided with those who accused him of inciting hatred.
 
For his part, the cardinal hasn’t relented, issuing an open letter asking for “objective” lawyers and jurists to read the full homily in which he delivered the controversial remarks, and to point out what part of his text broke the law. Cañizares also has called for Christians in Valencia to refuse to comply with a bill that would allow minors to have a gender reorientation surgery, financed by the state, even without their parents’ consent (which under the law they would still need, for instance, to get a tattoo). 
 
In what was supposed to be a private letter to Puig and Oltra, but which was leaked and appeared in the Spanish press, Cañizares told the regional leaders that they reminded him of the regime of Spanish dictators Francisco Franco.
 
Despite recognizing Catholicism as the official religion, Franco also prohibited “seditious” sermons and other actions deemed offensive to the government or the military, or damaging to the unity of Spain. Manolo Mata, the spokesman of Valencia’s socialist government, saidWednesday the party considered the issue “resolved” after they failed to get the needed support to make the Corts Valencianes, the autonomous region’s main legislative body, condemn Cañizares. The criminal proceedings, however, are on-going.
____________
 
Michael Hoffman’s Truth Mission is made possible by the sale of his publications and recordings, and donations from truth seekers.
____________

Canada: Your Ward News & Editor Banned from Sending or Receiving Mail https://www.youtube.com/edit?video_id=jUoBN86A2pw&video_referrer=watch Dear Mr. Hickey: YOUR WARD NEWS may be a case in which the OCLA may wish to intervene. The Interim Prohibitory Order makes the editor and publishers non-persons. They may neither send nor receive mail, The relevant section of the Canada Post Corporation Act states: (3) Subject to subsection (4), while an interim or final prohibitory order is in effect, the Minister may (a) detain or return to the sender any mail addressed to, or anything posted by, the person affected; This totalitarian penalty is imposed because on “reasoanble grounds” the Minister believes YOUR WARD NEWS is violating Sec. 319 (“hate law”) or the defamatory libel section 300. However, no such charges have been laid against YOUR WARD NEWS, and, needless to say, no convictions registered, Furthermore, even if there had been convictions for previous issues, each issue of the paper is different. I think Sec. 43-46 of the Act over-reach and, in this instance, deny the victims natural justice. Paul Fromm Director CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION Preview YouTube video Censorship Canada: Your Ward News & Editor Banned from Sending or Receiving Mail

Canada: Your Ward News & Editor Banned from Sending or Receiving Mail

 
Dear Mr. Hickey:
 
YOUR WARD NEWS may be a case in which the OCLA may wish to intervene.
 
The Interim Prohibitory Order makes the editor and publishers non-persons. They may neither send nor receive mail,
 
The relevant section of the Canada Post Corporation Act states: 

(3) Subject to subsection (4), while an interim or final prohibitory order is in effect, the Minister may

  • (a) detain or return to the sender any mail addressed to, or anything posted by, the person affected; 
This totalitarian penalty is imposed because on “reasoanble grounds” the Minister believes YOUR WARD NEWS is violating Sec. 319 (“hate law”) or the defamatory libel section 300.
 
However, no such charges have been laid against YOUR WARD NEWS, and, needless to say, no convictions registered, 
 
Furthermore, even if there had been convictions for previous issues,  each issue of the paper is different.
 
I think Sec. 43-46 of the Act over-reach and, in this instance, deny the victims natural justice.
 
Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION

Marcus Gee of the Globe and Mail Gives A Ringing Endorsement of Free Speech for YOUR WARD NEWS

Marcus Gee of the Globe and Mail Gives A Ringing Endorsement of Free Speech for YOUR WARD NEWS

 
 
Inline image 2

 

MARCUS GEE

Postal censorship is a cure worse than the disease

MARCUS GEE

The Globe and Mail

Last updated 

Canadians who value free speech – and let’s hope that is all of us – should be deeply troubled by Ottawa’s decision to tell Canada Post to stop carrying a fringe Toronto newspaper. Public Services Minister Judy Foote ordered the postal service to cease delivering Your Ward News, which has been accused of being anti-Semitic and pro-Nazi. Her “interim prohibitory order” gives its editor 10 days to appeal.

Those who have campaigned against the free paper are “ecstatic.” But consider the awful precedent this act of postal censorship sets.

If people who are offended by something that appears in their mailbox can complain and get it banned from the post, where does it stop? Can a pro-choice feminist block the graphic pro-life pamphlet that comes in the mail? Can a fierce pro-lifer ban a flier from an abortion clinic? Or consider the feelings of the victim of East European communism who gets a Marxist tract in the mail? Why should an agency of the government that her taxes support be allowed to introduce that propaganda into her home?

This is the trouble with just about all limits on free speech. Who says what is beyond the pale? Deciding to block child pornography or open incitement to violence is easy enough, because of the direct physical harm they can be shown to cause. After that, it gets tricky.

Someone must have the power to determine what is dangerous or odious speech and what is merely passionate expression. It is always a matter of opinion. The line is impossible to draw, the scope for abuse endless.

Even in democratic countries, authorities have often succumbed to the impulse to black out what they don’t like. Communist propaganda was blocked on the grounds that it threatened national security, erotica on the grounds that it undermined public morals. The postal system was once one of the main agents of censorship. A century ago, postal censors blocked mailed instalments of James Joyce’s Ulysses.

Your Ward News is not Ulysses. Its editor, James Sears, who has been known to style himself as Dimitri the Lover, told City News that Hitler is his second-biggest idol, after Jesus. He ends his e-mails “Expel the Parasite!” – all in capital letters, of course. The group that has been fighting him calls his publication a “neo-Nazi-rag” that “has been permitted to disseminate racism, homophobia, misogyny and anti-Semitism to as many as 300,000 homes in Toronto.”

If so, there are a couple of ways to fight back short of censorship. One is simply to toss Your Ward News where it belongs: in the recycling bin. Nobody is forced to read it when it comes in the mail. People like Mr. Sears thrive on the oxygen of attention. Ignoring him is the best revenge.

Another is to argue back. If his opponents feel his maunderings are too despicable to pass over, they can always denounce or refute him. It is always better to fight speech with speech than to gag the speaker.

It is a good time to remember these old lessons about how to handle troublesome speech. Free expression is always under attack to some degree, and the danger seems especially acute today. The little tussle over Your Ward News is part of a wider struggle.

Overseas, authoritarian governments from Moscow to Beijing to Cairo are cracking down on the right to speak openly without fear. Canadians got a small glimpse of their attitude when China’s foreign minister dressed down a reporter in Ottawa for daring to ask a question about human rights. At home, on university campuses and beyond, the tendency to take offence is stifling healthy debate and silencing dissenting voices.

Sometimes those voices can be obnoxious, but it won’t do to try to snuff them out. Ottawa has no business telling the postal service to censor the mail just because some people don’t like what comes through the slot.

Publisher and Editor of YOUR WARD NEWS Stripped of Mail Service

Publisher and Editor of YOUR WARD NEWS Stripped of Mail Service

TORONTO, June 6, 2016. Don’t worry if you’ve never been to North Korea or seen its comic book president Kim-Jong On. You can see the same repressive tyranny in politically correct Ottawa. Of course, there aren’t brutal work camps. Canada is more sophisticated — a soft tyranny, but a tyranny nonetheless.

The apostles of “diversity” and “inclusiveness” have no tolerance for diversity of opinion. Their latest target is a zany East End Toronto satirical paper, Your Ward News. The agitation for silencing this irreverent tabloid has been spearheaded by longtime Liberal Party backroom boy Warren Kinsella and Ottawa lawyer and champion human rights complainant Richard Warman.

The cultural Marxist elite in Ottawa have abandoned traditional procedures of English Common Law, like the quaint belief that one is INNOCENT until proven guilty and that one should not be punished in advance.

On June 6, Your Ward News Editor, Dr. James Sears was informed by Canada Post that Public Services [but not if you’re a dissident] Minister Judy Foote had slapped him with an Interim Prohibitory Order under Sec. 43.1order, essentially forbidding him or Your Ward News Metis publisher Leroy St. Germaine from using the mail for any purpose.

Dr. Sears reports: “Canada Post received a registered letter from Judy Foote, the Member of Parliament in charge of the post office, ordering them to reject delivery of our newspaper (even though they have not yet even seen a copy of it). Every level of government has tried to nail us for “hate crimes” repeatedly but their lawyers kept telling them that we are breaking no laws. Now Judy Foote says we are guilty of “criminal libel” for “publishing lies”. She did not specify which “lies”, but I am sure it is due to the “Holohoax”. We have never been charged with any crimes, let alone convicted!” The Minister, as well, said she had reason to believe Your Ward News contained material in violation of Sec. 319 of the Criminal Code (Canada’s notorious “hate law.”)

It must be emphasized that Your Ward News has never been charged much less convicted of anything.

Dr. Sears did receive his copy of the letter dated May 26 until June 6! ‘[Is this typical of Canada Post’s service?] He has 10 days to seek an appeal of this Prohibitory Order.

“The Canadian Association for Free Expression will be organizing support for Your Ward News to uphold freedom of speech, freedom of the press and full access to the monopolistic and overpriced services taxpayers pay to Canada Post,” said Paul Fromm, CAFÉ Director, from Port Credit, Ontario this afternoon.

CANADA: The New Sodom and Gomorrah? 

CANADA: The New Sodom and Gomorrah?


By
Arthur Topham
 
June 4th, 2016
CANADANEWSODOM?

CANADA: The New Sodom and Gomorrah? 

 
By
Arthur Topham

 

On May 17th, 2016, a day recognized by the federal government as “International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia, and Biphobia”, an edict emanated forth from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s office (PMO) stating that the Liberal government was planning to make additional changes to the “Hate Propaganda” laws (Sections 318 to 320) of the Criminal Code of Canada in order to “protect” the nation’s sexually deviant members.
UpYoursTrudeauJr
The unabashed and strident manner in which the federal government is pushing forward with its controversial agenda of planned perversion and subversion of Canadian society (under the guise of supposed “human rights” for sexual aberrants) is an issue fraught with deep and troubling concern, not only those Canadians of the Christian faith who prefer to rely upon the eternal wisdom of God and Nature but also for millions of other citizens whose moral standards won’t permit them to accept the subversive and sinister hidden aim within the government’s mandate to criminalize public dissent and discussion on moral, ethical and health standards affecting the nation as a whole.
In the words of the PM, “To do its part, the Government of Canada today will introduce legislation that will help ensure transgender and other gender-diverse people can live according to their gender identity, free from discrimination, and protected from hate propaganda and hate crimes.”
FREEXPRESSIONLOCKUP copy 4
The reality that the federal government intends to expand rather than repeal Section 318 – 320 of the Canadian Criminal Code is disconcerting  in itself given the excessively subjective nature of this draconian section of the Code. The concept of “Hate Propaganda” as a “criminal offence” is nothing less than a blatant example of government mind control; one that, here in Canada, has proven itself over the last half century of contentious litigation, to be extremely controversial, provocative and unjust and a clear and present danger to freedom of expression or “free speech” as defined by Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The alarm bells ought to be ringing across the country at the thought of this new “Liberal” government of Justin Trudeau pulling the Orwellian zipper of censorship even tighter over the mouths of Canada’s citizens than his predecessor Harper. It appears to be a new day but still the same old shit – of increasingly repressive laws and greater restrictions on individual freedoms theoretically guaranteed by our Charter.
5FeetFury copy
In fact the threat of expanding Canada’s “hate” laws to include ‘Tranny’(i.e. transvestite) protection has already angered and incensed Canadian bloggers as we see in the following reaction by Kathy Shaidle, one of the veterans of the previous “Section 13” wars that were ongoing during Harper’s reign.
As I’ve stated numerous times and especially in my essay Bad Moon Rising: How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s “Hate Propaganda” Laws, these Communist-inspired laws were surreptitiously and deliberately put in place through the mendacious actions of various Jewish lobby organizations such as the Canadian Jewish Congress, B’nai Brith Canada and, more recently, the newly-formed Centre for Israel & Jewish Affairs, all of whom have worked in tandem for decades to ensure that issues to do with Israel and its Zionist ideological political system would ultimately fall within this section of the Code and therefore make any truthful and factual statements about important civil and national issues indictable offences.
What must be clearly understood from the start when discussing the issue of  “Hate Propaganda” laws is that the notion of elevating the natural emotional feeling of hatred into a pseudo-legal category wherein it becomes an indictable offence is purely an invention of the Zionist Jews and in certain respects an historical concomitant of the Bolshevik era’s Leninist/Stalinist totalitarian terror regimes. One could rightly state that its essential character is embodied in such classics of “hate” literature as Germany Must Perish!, a book written back in 1941 by the Jewish author Theodore N. Kaufman with the sole purpose of inciting America to hate Germany and then translate that hatred into the USA joining the Allies in their unjust war against the National Socialist government of Germany.
EyeOnFreeSpeech600
In a previous article entitled Canada: Hypocrite Nation Ruled by Zionist Deception & anti-Free Speech Laws I had the following to say about these despicable, sham legal subterfuges disguised as legitimate jurisprudence:
“The war to silence Canadians and stymie any public speech that the Jewish lobby felt might negatively impact them or Israel in any way (either on or off the internet), gained its foothold back in 1977 when the federal government first implemented the so-called Canadian Human Rights Act and created its attendant enforcement agencies, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT). Both the commission and the tribunal were quasi-judicial, i.e. “crazy” judicial in that they basically set their own rules and guidelines and consistently changed the “legal” goal posts depending upon whatever case they were dealing with, in order to ensure a conviction. If fact, of the hundreds of Canadians dragged before these Stalinist style “Show Trial” tribunals, EVERYONE was found guilty for the simple reason that all it took was for someone to register a complain against them and that, in itself, sealed their fate. When I describe Section 13 as a “Bolshevik” type law I do so with the full knowledge that under the former Soviet system, Lenin, in one of the regime’s very first acts upon gaining absolute power, was to make “anti-Semitism” a crime punishable by death. Death, that is, without so much as a trial even. All it would take, (just as with the Section 13 “complaints”) was for someone to accuse another of said crime and the Cheka (soviet secret police) had the excuse to liquidate the victim.”
Reporting on this issue in Christian News Heather Clark remarks that apart from the criminal aspects of this proposed legislation there are those like Charles McVety, president of the Institute for Canadian Values and others who consider the bill to be “nebulous and reckless.”
Clark’s article goes on, “Bill C-16 is so vague, it is unenforceable,” he [McVety] said in a statement. “The fluid nature of gender identity is so nebulous that people can change their gender identity moment by moment. In that the bill seeks to change the Criminal Code of Canada, people may be sent to prison for two years over something that is ill-defined, and indeterminable.”
“It is also reckless as the proposed law will establish universal protection for any man who wishes to access women’s bathrooms or girls’ showers with momentary gender fluidity,” McVety continued. “Every Member of Parliament should examine their conscience over the potential of their vote exposing women and girls to male genitalia.”
JewShitter
In the context of our Charter rights Clark says, “There is also uncertainty as to how the law will be applied to free speech. As previously reported, in 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the conviction of activist William Whatcott, who found himself in hot water after distributing flyers regarding the Bible’s prohibitions against homosexuality throughout the Saskatoon and Regina neighborhoods in 2001 and 2002.”
Bill-Whatcott-Image
As Charles McVety rightfully stated the proposed Bill C-16 is definitely “nebulous and reckless” but as past convictions in both the cases of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act and Section 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code show, simply because it’s “vague” doesn’t mean that it isn’t “enforceable”. All it takes are judges and justices within the Canadian judicial system who will interpret and lend credence to subjective definitions of nebulous terms such as “hatred” so that they may then shapeshift into whatever meaning the Crown wishes in order to fit the charge. No better example currently exists than the latest and most severe case of Whatcott.
Conclusion: What’s coming next?
During the heated Sec. 13 Campaign here in Canada when the Canadian Human Rights Act was being wielded like a club by the Canadian Human Rights Commission and bloggers around the country were being bludgeoned and jailed, fined and nailed to the “hate crime” cross the Zionist element within the Conservative Right finally realized that the Sec. 13 legislation no longer was serving just their purposes but was being turned against them as well. As a result they garnered the support of Canada’s Zionist media monopoly and the lobbying to repeal the specious section of the Act was eventually accomplished back in June of 2012. Unfortunately they weren’t smart enough to realize that the “Hate Propaganda” laws within the Criminal Code were even more insidious than Sec. 13. They figured that as long as Sec. 319(2) of the ccc was there and could be used against critics of Israel and anyone else accused of “anti-Semitism” then that was just fine with them. To hell (or jail) with “freedom of speech” if it meant allowing bloggers to speak openly and frankly about the Jews or the Zionist empire builders.
But the tables appear to be turning once again as the new Liberal government of Justin Trudeau begins forcing their faggot philosophy down the throats of unwilling Canadians and then, on top of that monumental insult, threatens the nation with increased criminal penalties of up to two years in jail for anyone who doesn’t want to go happily and gayly along down the road to Sodom and Gomorrah carrying their little rainbow flag in hand.
Will they eventually start campaigning to repeal these anti-free speech laws contained in Sec. 318 to 320 of the Criminal Code and get rid of the last vestiges of Orwellian censorship in Canada?
Time will soon tell.
——
 
The upcoming Constitutional Charter argument and potential appeal of this Zionist-created false flag legislation will determine once and for all whether or not Canada will adhere to the spirit and intent of its Charter of Rights and Freedoms or continue to bow down to foreign interests and sacrificing its citizen’s fundamental rights.
 
Please try to assist in this process by making a small donation to the cause. My GoGetFunding site can be found here: http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/
 
One can also donate by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address. Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to – Arthur Topham – and sent to:
 
Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8
THANK YOU!
 
Standing for Canada and our democratic ideals I remain,
 
Sincerely,
 
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 199