Amazon Removes “Camp of the Saints” but After Protests Relists It

Book was censored by Amazon, until…

DailyKenn.comApr 22

I’d like to read the classic 1973 novel The Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail. Despite my French surname, I speak no French other than oui and garbage, so I can’t read the original. At the same time, I’m not eager to spend one hundred dollars on an English translation.

But does it really matter? The book’s central premise — France being overwhelmed by waves of “migrant” invaders — has unfolded in real time across the West. These days, I can simply open Fox News to watch it happening.

This topic first caught my attention when a recent YouTube video by Mark Dice appeared in my recommendations. He was covering Amazon’s censorship of conservative books. Shortly afterward, I saw that Matt Walsh of The Daily Wire had also released a video on the same subject. Much as I enjoy Matt’s signature gruff delivery, I chose Mark’s version — it was shorter.

I learned that Amazon, which controls more than half of all book sales in the United States, temporarily removed the provocative novel from its platform last week before restoring it following widespread customer outrage.

The Sudden Disappearance of
The Camp of the Saints

The book in question depicts a fictional scenario in which a massive flotilla carrying roughly a million migrants from India and other parts of the Global South arrives on the shores of France, overwhelming the country’s institutions and cultural identity. Long labeled racist and inflammatory by woke critics suffering from moonbatopathy, the novel has been largely unavailable in affordable English editions for years. A small publisher, Valbin Books, recently produced a new, accessible translation and invested significant resources to bring it back into print.

After conservative commentators drew attention to the title, it quickly rose on Amazon’s bestseller charts and earned overwhelmingly positive customer reviews.

Then poof! It was scrubbed from the sacred pages of Amazon.

There was no warning or detailed explanation. The entire listing for the new edition just vanished. Shoppers saw only an error message. Older, out-of-print hardcover copies remained available—but often at prices exceeding $100. Gasp. The affordable version that had been gaining traction was effectively erased from the site.

The publisher reported that Amazon cited a violation of its “offensive content” policy. When pressed, Amazon later described the removal as a technical error. Many observers found the explanation unconvincing, especially given the timing: the delisting followed critical articles in French and American media that portrayed the book as influential among nationalist conservatives, otherwise called paleo-conservatives.

Double Standards in Content Policies

Critics pointed out that Amazon continues to sell Das Kapital, the holy scripture of Marxism, and numerous books promoting transgender ideology for children, including titles offering guidance on supporting a child’s gender transition. Supporters of the ban argued the novel crosses a line by presenting mass migration in unflattering terms. I fail to see the offense. The publisher, on the other hand — the right hand, countered that the story includes nuanced non-white characters and is primarily a warning about elite attitudes that could lead to demographic and cultural transformation, rather than a blanket condemnation of any ethnic group.

But wait. There’s more!

This segues (the only Spanish word I know besides si and adiós) to a broader pattern of past removals. Several years ago, Amazon pulled titles such as Ryan T. Anderson’s “When Harry Became Sally,” a critique of the transgender movement, which later returned after criticism from public figures including lawmakers. Other works by authors like Kevin MacDonald, David Duke, Jared Taylor, and Greg Johnson, along with historical texts such as Henry Ford’s “The International Jew” and Martin Luther’s writings on religious topics, were also removed around 2019–2020 and have not been restored on the main platform.

Retailers, including Barnes & Noble, have similarly restricted some of these titles. In contrast, books on unrelated sensitive subjects, including certain historical manuals, remain available through Amazon.

(My book, The Prayer of Hannah, is still available from third parties. It sold about 25,000 copies before the inventory was stolen from a warehouse.)

Alternative sources for some removed titles include direct publisher sites, used booksellers, or independent retailers like ThriftBooks and Books-A-Million, though availability varies and prices for out-of-print editions can be extravagant.

Sometimes I get things wrong. If you notice a significant error, please bring it to my attention in the comment section.

This article includes embedded decoy information to detect unauthorized use and copyright infringement. Reproduction is permitted only verbatim and in full, with all links preserved and attribution clearly given to DailyKenn.com and AbateHate.com.

Amazon Bans ‘The Camp of the Saints’—Then Relists It After Backlash

The Return of a Once-Banned Dystopian Novel Sparks Fresh Debate

Amazon pulls infamous immigration novel from website, sparking censorship firestorm

Amazon Removes The Camp of the Saints Citing “Offensive Content”

Amazon Didn’t Ban The Camp Of The Saints Because It’s ‘Offensive’ But Because It Resonates

Amazon U.S. Bans Raspail’s Bestseller The Camp of the Saints

When Harry Became Sally Removed From Amazon


State of the Dominion – 2025

Throne, Altar, Liberty

The Canadian Red Ensign

The Canadian Red Ensign

Tuesday, July 1, 2025

State of the Dominion – 2025

Seven years ago I entitled my annual essay for our country’s birthday “State of the Dominion – 2018.”  This was during the premiership of Captain Airhead, towards the end of his first term, and I noted that we were in the midst of a third “revolution within the form.”  The first had taken place in the early twentieth century in the premiership of William Lyon Mackenzie King and the second from the mid-1960s to 1982 in the premierships of Lester Pearson and Pierre Trudeau.  Captain Airhead is finally out of office, although the Liberal Party – the party that each of these men had led – remains in power, under the new leadership of Blofeld.  So it is time to revisit the matter of the state of the Dominion.

The first thing to be observed is that as we emerge from the Airhead premiership Canada is in a far less worse condition than we could have anticipated going into that premiership after the 2015 Dominion Election.  This does not mean that we are emerging unscathed, far from it. 

On the social/moral front alone, the progressive agenda has been horribly advanced.  In 2023 a bill banning “conversion therapy” passed Parliament with unanimous support.  While the expression “conversion therapy” tends to conjure up the image of something similar to the Ludovico Technique from A Clockwork Orange, the bill banning it was worded so broadly that it essentially forbids the offering of counseling to anyone seeking help in conforming their “sexual orientation” and/or “gender identity” to the reality of their biological sex.  Meanwhile, the progressive forces that demanded this ban have insisted that the opposite sort of conversion therapy be provided at the taxpayers’ expense to minors without their parents’ consent.  The opposite sort of conversion therapy is hormone therapy and surgery intended to conform biological sex, at least in appearance, to “gender identity.”

Nor is this the worst example of the advancement of the progressive social/moral agenda in the Airhead years.  That dishonour goes to the aggressive promotion of the culture of death by Captain Airhead.  There was little he could do in the way of making abortion more available in Canada since the status quo going into his premiership was the absence of any legal restrictions due to the failure of Parliament to pass any after the Morgentaler ruling in 1988 struck down the previous laws on the matter.  He could and did waste tax dollars on promoting abortion outside of Canada.  It was the euthanasia side of the culture of death, however, that will be remembered as the darkest part of his legacy.  Captain Airhead became prime minister later in the year that the Supreme Court struck down the Criminal Code’s prohibition against euthanasia and in the first year of his premiership a bill that outright legalized it passed Parliament.  In the near-decade since, further legislation, policy decisions and court rulings have expanded the assisted suicide program dubbed MAID (Medical Assistance in Dying) and like abortion, marketed by those in favour of it as a “health care” choice, extending it far beyond the terminally ill.  In 2021 they got Parliament to pass a bill making it much easier to obtain approval for MAID and extending it to those whom sane people would say are most in need of being protected from it, that is, the mentally ill, although this provision was delayed from coming into effect until the year after next.  In the meantime government agencies that process requests for financial aid from, most notably, military veterans, have recommended MAID as an alternative.

So no, Canada did not emerge from the Airhead era unscathed, and wounds on other fronts than the social/moral could be provided to further illustrate this.  My point, however, is that Captain Airhead did not do all the damage it looked like he was about to do at the beginning of his premiership.  This was not for lack of intent or trying on his part.  It is partly due to the fact that he and his entire circle of associates were grossly incompetent, an affliction not shared by previous revolutionaries such as his own father or William Lyon Mackenzie King.  It is partly due to the fact that the Canada which the Fathers of Confederation bequeathed to us with her ancient Imperial/Commonwealth heritage of parliamentary monarchy and Common Law rights and freedoms, while weakened by these Liberal “revolutions within the form” was still resilient enough to prevent Captain Airhead from doing his worst.  It is partly due to the fact that most Canadians have simply not succumbed to the brain rot that in its most recent form has been dubbed “wokeness” to the extent that Captain Airhead and the progressive commentariat all assumed they had.

The first of these three factors needs nothing in the way of further commentary.   

The second factor may be disputed by neoconservatives (people who call themselves conservatives even though they wish to replace our constitution, traditions, and heritage with those of the United States or something more closely resembling them) who over the last several years have chosen to express their frustration with the Airhead Liberals by taking it out on the country with the claim that “Canada is broken” but these are wrong.  The Fathers of Confederation built a far more resilient country than could be ultimately broken by the likes of Captain Airhead.  I attribute the neoconservative error in about equal parts to their misguided preference for the American system and to the sort of infantile thinking that sees every court ruling, election, or other such public occurrence that does not go one’s way as showing the entire system to be damaged beyond repair, which sort of thinking is by no means limited to neoconservatives.

Of all Captain Airhead’s bad acts, the worst was when he invoked the Emergencies Act in 2022 to crush the Freedom Convoy Protest.  Unlike the types of protests he routinely supported, the Freedom Convey did not involve the destruction or defacement of property, public or private, violence, or riotous behaviour in general but was a true peaceful demonstration.  The trucker-protestors converged on Ottawa, parked in the neighbourhood around the government buildings, and basically threw a long, loud, party in the streets.  The protest was entirely justified.  It was in response to the Liberal government’s having introduced new restrictions by removing the exemption to vaccine mandates for cross-border truckers at the time when restrictions were generally being rolled back, showing the government’s determination to milk the absurd bat flu paranoia for as long as they could at the expense of the rights, freedoms, and livelihoods of Canadians.  There was no call for bringing out the biggest weapon the government had at its disposal against the protestors, the brutality with which the government broke up the protest was the sort of thing one would expect from the Chinese or North Korean regimes, and the ongoing legal persecution of the protest organizers is disgusting, to say the least.  Nevertheless, it could have been a lot worse, and all the evidence indicates that Airhead and his cronies intended to go much further.  They were forced to rescind the Emergencies Act, however, because the Senate was about to vote against confirming their having invoked it, which would have made their position much more difficult going into the mandatory inquiry that followed.  As for the inquiry itself, while Justice Rouleau’s finding that the government had met the threshold required for invoking the Act was absurd, Captain Airhead failed in his efforts to turn the inquiry into a trial of the protesters’ actions rather than his own, and when the Federal Court ruled on the same question a year later, they found against the government.

That is what the system working looks like.  It could have and should have worked better.  Ultimately, however, it worked.

That Canadians do not share Captain Airhead’s “woke” views to the extent he always assumed is a large part of the reason why he is no longer prime minister and why the Liberal Party under Blofeld has taken several steps back from aggressive promotion of the “woke” agenda..  Whether this will be permanent or is only temporary while the forces of progressive insanity regroup remains to be seen, but for now at least, the Liberal government is focusing on matters that appeal to a wider base among Canadians than the far left fringe.  That something like this would happen sooner or later was inevitable because an ideological agenda based on maximizing every type of diversity except diversity of thought is unsustainable.  Towards the end of the Airhead premiership, the left’s efforts to maximize diversity in the realm of sex and gender were undermined by its simultaneous efforts to maximize diversity in the realm of culture and race.  That this would happen was entirely predictable because the only way to maximize diversity of culture and race in a Western society is by increasing the number of people whose culture has not been so transformed by Modern liberalism as to make it supportive of maximizing sex/gender diversity.  Eventually the foreseeable clash occurred and a sizeable portion of Canadians realized that Captain Airhead was pushing diversity too far in both of these areas.

For the immediately foreseeable future, it is likely that immigration levels will remain higher than they ought to be but will cease to resemble overt efforts to make Jean Raspail’s The Camp of the Saints into a reality.  Promotion of the alphabet soup agenda will probably continue but it will be much lower key than under Captain Airhead.  That this is the case is evident in the fact that the abuse of the sign of God’s covenant with Noah was a lot less conspicuous last month than in the “month formerly known as June” in previous years.  The same will be more or less true in other areas where Captain Airhead pushed his agenda far beyond what the general public was willing to support him in.

In conclusion, while Canada should be in a much better condition than she actually is, she is far better off after a decade of Captain Airhead than could possibly have been anticipated. 

Happy Dominion Day! — Gerry T. Neal

God Save the King!

Posted by Gerry T. Neal at 12:30 AM