Rather than end the authoritarian, anti-democratic lockdowns, Trudeau and the corrupt political class continue to double-down on ruthless government power.
Justin Trudeau is escalating the authoritarian language surrounding the endless lockdowns being imposed on Canadians.
In the video below, Trudeau says “not following the rules” could mean “prison time.”
As I pointed out on Twitter, Trudeau only makes this threat after politicians are returning home, and are thus protected from it being imposed on them:
“Now that all the politicians are coming back from their vacations, Trudeau threatens prison time for those who break the rules. Of course, that threat only comes after politicians are safely protected from it.”
Now, the answer to hypocritical politicians travelling isn’t to place more restrictions on Canadians.
The answer is to end the lockdowns, end the restrictions on Canadians, make all of these recommendations voluntary.
Consider that the politicians are still claiming that the Charter protects the right to travel, which is correct.
However, if we have the right to travel outside the country and come back, then we must also have the right to travel freely within the country.
And that means we have the right to keep our businesses open, visit our families, and gather with whomever we want.
It is impossible to justify restrictions within our country while keeping the borders and airports open.
To end this hypocrisy, we must end the restrictions, and respect the freedom of Canadians to make our own individual choices.
Rather than end the authoritarian, anti-democratic lockdowns, Trudeau and the corrupt political class continue to double-down on ruthless government power.
Justin Trudeau is escalating the authoritarian language surrounding the endless lockdowns being imposed on Canadians.
In the video below, Trudeau says “not following the rules” could mean “prison time.” https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?creatorScreenName=SpencerFernando&dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1346509428644851712&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fspencerfernando.com%2F2021%2F01%2F05%2Fwatch-trudeau-says-not-following-the-rules-could-mean-prison-time%2F&siteScreenName=SpencerFernando&theme=light&widgetsVersion=ed20a2b%3A1601588405575&width=550px
As I pointed out on Twitter, Trudeau only makes this threat after politicians are returning home, and are thus protected from it being imposed on them:
“Now that all the politicians are coming back from their vacations, Trudeau threatens prison time for those who break the rules. Of course, that threat only comes after politicians are safely protected from it.” https://platform.twitter.com/embed
Now, the answer to hypocritical politicians travelling isn’t to place more restrictions on Canadians.
The answer is to end the lockdowns, end the restrictions on Canadians, make all of these recommendations voluntary.
Consider that the politicians are still claiming that the Charter protects the right to travel, which is correct.
However, if we have the right to travel outside the country and come back, then we must also have the right to travel freely within the country.
And that means we have the right to keep our businesses open, visit our families, and gather with whomever we want.
It is impossible to justify restrictions within our country while keeping the borders and airports open.
To end this hypocrisy, we must end the restrictions, and respect the freedom of Canadians to make our own individual choices.
Spencer Fernando
Photo – YouTube
***
If you want to support my independent perspective, you can Donate through Paypal at the button below:
Follow Spencer Fernando on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/v2.3/plugins/page.php?app_id=249643311490&channel=https%3A%2F%2Fstaticxx.facebook.com%2Fx%2Fconnect%2Fxd_arbiter%2F%3Fversion%3D46%23cb%3Dfaef70c72c1a88%26domain%3Dspencerfernando.com%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fspencerfernando.com%252Ff8c10323069a9%26relation%3Dparent.parent&container_width=270&height=130&hide_cover=false&hide_cta=false&href=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FSpencerKFernando%2F&locale=en_US&sdk=joey&show_facepile=false&small_header=false&tabs=false&width=340 Search for: National Citizens Coalition
Spencer Fernando is writing a weekly column as a Campaign Fellow for the National Citizens Coalition. Visit their website at the link below:
Rather than end the authoritarian, anti-democratic lockdowns, Trudeau and the corrupt political class continue to double-down on ruthless government power.
Justin Trudeau is escalating the authoritarian language surrounding the endless lockdowns being imposed on Canadians.
In the video below, Trudeau says “not following the rules” could mean “prison time.” https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?creatorScreenName=SpencerFernando&dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1346509428644851712&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fspencerfernando.com%2F2021%2F01%2F05%2Fwatch-trudeau-says-not-following-the-rules-could-mean-prison-time%2F&siteScreenName=SpencerFernando&theme=light&widgetsVersion=ed20a2b%3A1601588405575&width=550px
As I pointed out on Twitter, Trudeau only makes this threat after politicians are returning home, and are thus protected from it being imposed on them:https://534d9044fffbac09844d96093f7b6ece.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.html
“Now that all the politicians are coming back from their vacations, Trudeau threatens prison time for those who break the rules. Of course, that threat only comes after politicians are safely protected from it.” https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?creatorScreenName=SpencerFernando&dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-1&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1346617805689425920&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fspencerfernando.com%2F2021%2F01%2F05%2Fwatch-trudeau-says-not-following-the-rules-could-mean-prison-time%2F&siteScreenName=SpencerFernando&theme=light&widgetsVersion=ed20a2b%3A1601588405575&width=550px
Now, the answer to hypocritical politicians travelling isn’t to place more restrictions on Canadians.
The answer is to end the lockdowns, end the restrictions on Canadians, make all of these recommendations voluntary.
Consider that the politicians are still claiming that the Charter protects the right to travel, which is correct.
However, if we have the right to travel outside the country and come back, then we must also have the right to travel freely within the country.
And that means we have the right to keep our businesses open, visit our families, and gather with whomever we want.
It is impossible to justify restrictions within our country while keeping the borders and airports open.
To end this hypocrisy, we must end the restrictions, and respect the freedom of Canadians to make our own individual choices.
Trudeau defends the right to protest in India as Canadians are arrested and fined for doing the same
He’s sucking up to another privileged minority — the Sikhs. In his first Cabinet, there were 4 Sikhs or 16%, but the constitute less than one per cent of Canada’s population. These farmers are mostly Sikhs.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau released a statement Tuesday morning expressing support for striking farmers in India.
Hundreds
of thousands of farmers in India have taken to the streets to protest
proposed agricultural laws which they argue will destroy their
livelihoods. The laws seek to deregulate crop pricing, which the
government says will break up monopolies, but opponents suggest will
leave farmers at the mercy of large corporations.
“Canada will
always be there to defend the right of peaceful protest,” Trudeau said
in his statement. He described the situation as “very concerning,”
further noting that he has “reached out to Indian authorities to
highlight” Canada’s concerns.
Meanwhile, Canadians who protest
against the government have frequently been subject to fines for
breaking coronavirus-related lockdown restrictions. An Independent MPP
in Ontario was recently handed a fine
for organizing a protest at Queen’s Park, the province’s legislature,
while the organizer of an anti-lockdown protest in Chatham-Kent, Ontario
was fined for organizing to oppose government lockdown restrictions.
A man in Etobicoke, Ontario who attempted to open his barbeque business was handed criminal charges for refusing to comply with lockdown orders, an event which gained significant media traction.
Measures
have been taken outside of Ontario to restrict freedom of assembly as
well. A man was fined in Saskatoon earlier this month for protesting against mask mandates, while the Manitoba government has promised to do the same to protesters in their province.
Also
in Manitoba, RCMP were sent to physically block the highway entrance to
a church which was attempting to host a Sunday prayer service.
Churchgoers were even prevented
from listening to the service from their own cars in the parking lot
due to the possibility of spreading coronavirus. According to Manitoba’s
Chief Public Health Officer Dr. Brent Roussin, gatherings of cars are
dangerous for the spread of coronavirus because some people might need
to use the bathroom, and more than one household may be present in a
single vehicle.
The
lockdown measures restricting the freedom of assembly guaranteed in the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms are meant to prevent the spread
of coronavirus. Yet despite having more than 9.4 million confirmed
cases of the virus, Trudeau has encouraged protests in India while
remaining silent as protesters are fined and arrested in Canada.
A spokesman from the Indian Ministry of External Affairs condemned Trudeau’s comments, describing them as “ill-informed” and “unwarranted.”
Nineteenth century Scottish writer Robert Louis
Stevenson is remembered mostly for his novels Treasure Island, featuring the pirate Long John Silver, and Kidnapped. Almost as well-known as these, and probably
far more influential in terms of the number of imitations it has inspired and
adaptations that have been made, is a shorter work, published in 1886, the same
year as Kidnapped, entitled Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde
(1).
The story is about a physician, Dr. Henry Jekyll, who
like everybody else, struggles with the inner conflict between his base
instincts and urges on the one hand and his ethical standards on the other. Unlike everybody else, he, being a scientist,
tries to find a scientific solution to the problem, which he sees more in terms
of the need to protect his reputation than to suppress his vicious
desires. He invents a serum that
transforms him into Mr. Edward Hyde so that he can indulge the latter without
damaging his reputation. The potion,
however, also produces a division in his moral character, basically separating
all the wickedness into the persona of Mr. Hyde and all of the goodness into
the persona of Dr. Jekyll. The
consequence of all of this, is that Mr. Hyde is left with no inner constraints
on his wickedness, and becomes a thoroughly depraved, sadistic, sociopathic,
murderer. Dr. Jekyll, who by contrast
becomes more upright, humane and saintly, eventually loses control over the
transformation process and starts to transform into Mr. Hyde involuntarily, at
first in his sleep, later when he is awake.
Then, running out of the serum that reverses the transformation, and
being unable to produce another batch that will work, he realizes that he is
about to become his evil alter-ego permanently, and commits suicide.
After the story was published and became widely known,
the names of the character became more or less synonymous with the kind of dual
personality in which a person can be sweet, gentile, and charming one minute
and the exact opposite of that the next.
I have been reminded of this story every time that
Doug Ford, the current premier of Upper Canada, or Ontario as those who like to
keep up with the times prefer to call it, has appeared in the news in the last
eight months and especially the last two.
Two summers ago, when the Progressive Conservatives
led by Doug Ford, won a majority of 76 out of the 124 seats in the provincial
legislature, I breathed a sigh of relief for our neighbours to the east. They had suffered under Grit misrule for
fifteen years, first under Dalton McGuinty and then under Kathleen Wynne, who
were in my opinion the two worst provincial-level Liberal leaders in the entire
history of the Dominion. The election
that put Doug Ford in the premier’s chair, also reduced the Grits to seven
seats, the worst defeat they have ever suffered in that province, which was
itself even greater cause to rejoice than the Conservative victory.
When Doug Ford became leader of Upper Canada’s
Progressive Conservatives in the lead-up to the provincial election of 2018, I
knew little about him other than that he was the brother of the late Rob Ford,
who from 2010 to 2014 had been mayor of the city which had been known as York
before political correctness prompted its being rechristened with the Indian
name of Toronto in 1834. During the
years in which Rob Ford was mayor, he was constantly under attack by the CBC
and the rest of the mainstream progressive media, which only strengthened me in
my conviction that, as I said at the time, Rob Ford, drunk and on crack, ran
his city better than any other sober mayor in Canada, including and especially
our own here in Winnipeg. That would
have been Sam Katz back then, and Mayor Duckie (2) who has since replaced him
is even worse.
The same corrupt left-wing media that had relentlessly
pursued the destruction of his brother, went after Doug Ford during the 2018
election. They shamelessly dug poor old
Rob up from his grave – he had passed away from cancer two years previously –
and began whipping and crucifying his corpse.
Since Ford was using populist rhetoric in his campaign, they naturally
compared him to Donald the Orange who through populism and nationalism had
become president of the American republic in 2016. Now,
just to be clear, since my politics happens to be the royal-monarch-as-defender-of-the-Church
kind of Toryism from which the Conservative Party has been lamentably drifting
for decades – or rather centuries – populism and nationalism are actually lower
in my own estimation than they are in that of the progressive media. Forced to choose between the former and the
latter, however, I would gladly chose the populists any day. So it was that this progressive assault on
“Ontario’s Trump” raised his stock considerably in my books.
Despite the media’s amusing attempt to use his
populist rhetoric to hang the “far right” label on him – neither populism nor
what the media considers to be “far right” is right wing at all, let alone
extremely right wing – Doug Ford was
basically a mainstream, centre-right, Progressive Conservative. His platform consisted mostly of tax
reductions, infrastructure improvement, de-regulation, and cleaning up the mess
that McGuinty and Wynne had made of the province’s school system. While there was much that was lacking in
this platform, it was a major improvement over what the former governing party
had been offering. After Ford won the
election, the first year and a half of his premiership were fairly
impressive. He stuck it to the
provincial bureaucrats with a salary-and-hiring freeze, and went to war with
the environazis who were determined to make life more miserable and
unaffordable for everybody because of their superstitious belief in a climate
apocalypse extrapolated through a computer simulation from the pseudoscientific
theory of anthropogenic global warming.
This included standing up to Captain Airhead, whom we are unfortunate
enough to have as the Prime Minister of Her Majesty’s government in Ottawa, and
who was threatening to impose a federal carbon tax on all provinces that did
not voluntarily adopt one of their own.
Shortly after the election, the new Minister of Education announced that
the province would repeal everything the outgoing government had done to turn
the schools into indoctrination camps for brainwashing young children with
sexual perversion and gender identity politics although there have been reports
that the follow-through on this was less than spectacular and that all they
really did was make a few minor adjustments.
(3)
The qualifying remarks in my last sentence
aside, Ford had gotten off to a fairly good start for a contemporary,
mainstream, Progressive Conservative premier.
Then the Chinese bat flu arrived in Upper Canada. When that happened, Doug Ford underwent an
almost-overnight metamorphosis into a despotic, bullying, COVID-monster, and
became the darling of the media that had been demonizing him for the last two
years.
Of course, something similar could be said about every
premier in the Dominion. Our own Progressive
Conservative Premier here in the south-east corner of Prince Rupert’s Land, Brian
Pallister, declared a state of emergency and put our province into a most
draconian lockdown before there was any significant outbreak, gave that – in my
opinion – power mad goon Dr. Brent Roussin a blank cheque for imposing
restrictions, no matter how stupid, self-contradictory, and outright harmful
they were, and only the other day doubled the fines for people who violate
these arbitrary regulations. Pallister,
however, has long been known to be a jerk.
The only reason I welcomed his re-election the other year is that the
other option was the truly odious Wab Kinew.
Doug Ford, on the other hand, had given us every reason to expect much
better of him, before he turned around and started acting like a squirt bottle
used for cleaning the orifices of the nether regions of the body.
Now, some might come to Doug Ford’s defence by saying that
his province was hit particularly hard by the bat flu. Granted, out of all the provinces its number
of deaths was exceeded only by those of Lower Canada. This hardly constitutes justification of his
actions, however. It is only to be
expected that in a country-wide outbreak, the two provinces of Central Canada
would have the most deaths. They have
the most people, after all. There is
more to it, however, than just that.
The bulk of the deaths in those provinces took place in long-term care
facilities, which, again, is predictable from the fact that the only people who
are at any sort of statistically
significant risk from the Chinese bat
flu are those who are really old, with two or more complicating health
conditions. In Upper and Lower Canada,
the situation in the nursing homes got so bad that the Armed Forces had to be
sent in to take the place of the staff who had either contracted the virus
themselves or deserted in fear of doing so.
They sent back to their superiors reports of the horrendous conditions
they found there – conditions such as cockroaches, rotting food, bedding left
soiled for days on end, and worse – caused not by the bat flu but by neglect
and abuse on the part of the administration and staff. While Ford is hardly to blame for such
conditions, for in many of these places this sort of thing had been going on
for years prior to his premiership, the fact of the matter is that had he done
the common sense thing at the beginning of the “pandemic” and taken measures to
provide extra protection for the people most at risk, rather than listening uncritically
to the imbecilic advice of medical experts who, themselves regurgitating
nonsense cooked up by the World Health Organization to serve the nefarious ends
of the Chinese Communists and the pharmaceutical conglomerates, recommended a universal
quarantine on the young and healthy instead, this sort of thing could have been
dealt with much earlier, and steps could have been taken which might have prevented
the outbreaks in the nursing homes from getting so bad. Jumping on board the lockdown bandwagon,
prevented him from pursuing other, sounder, options, and made the situation
even worse.
When the World Health Organization screamed “pandemic”,
Ford traded in his tired old populism and common sense for a shiny new superstitious
belief in the infallibility of international health organizations and other
medical experts, and imposed their recommendations with a particularly heavy
hand. When people with legitimate
concerns about the erosion of their rights, freedoms, livelihoods and businesses
under public health orders and who likely largely overlapped the people who had
voted Ford into the premier’s office two years ago, began to protest against social
distancing, lockdowns, and the like, he dismissed them all as yahoos. In July, he rammed Bill 195 through the legislature,
a bill which gave him two years’ worth of emergency powers which he could
exercise without consulting the legislature.
This was a province-level equivalent of what Captain Airhead and his
Liberals had tried to sneak into an emergency spending bill in Parliament in
March, but which Her Majesty’s Loyal Opposition had mercifully thwarted. Ford punished the members of his own party
who voted against this bill, such as Belinda Karahalios, the MPP representing
Cambridge, by expelling them from the caucus.
On Monday, September 28th, Ford held a
press conference in which he announced that his province was officially in the “second
wave” of the bat flu, and that it “will be worse than the first wave we faced
earlier this year.” As with all the other
claptrap about this so-called “second wave” this was a cunning form of
sleight-of-hand. That day, Upper Canada
had seen the highest number of new cases recorded in a single day since the
beginning of the pandemic. It had not
seen a commensurate spike in the number of people gravely sick, being
hospitalized, put in intensive care, and dying. Indeed, the new cases were mostly among age
groups which were not at any significant risk from the disease. This has been more or less the case
everywhere throughout this so-called “second wave”. My province, which seen the number of deaths
multiply since the beginning of September – we were at fourteen at the
beginning of September and are now at forty-seven, is not an exception. These deaths are, like those which more
populated provinces experienced in the spring, almost entirely among those who
are both extremely old and extremely sick, because this is Manitoba’s first
wave, the entire misguided and totalitarian “flatten the curve” strategy having
merely delayed it, while causing a whole lot of unnecessary other harm in the
process.
Even before Ford made this announcement, he had
lowered the number of people allowed to meet socially in Toronto, Peel Region,
and Ottawa to ten, slapped a $10 000 fine on anyone who organized an event that
broke this rule, and a $750 fine on anyone who attended. It is difficult to decide which is more
ridiculous, the limit of social gatherings to ten in a country where assembly and
association are two of the officially recognized fundamental freedoms, or the
insanely high amounts of those fines. (4) Certainly,
the late Rob Ford, who was well known for his love of large social gatherings,
must be spinning in his grave over all this party-pooping, and the whole
general way in which his brother has turned into a piece of rotting Communist excrement.
My unsolicited advice to Ford is to find the serum
that will turn him back to his original self and to do so quickly. Nobody, except the media progressives, who
want everybody to spend the rest of their lives, hiding under their beds in
their basements, curled up in the fetal position, sucking their thumbs, afraid
to go out lest the SARS-Cov-2 Bogeyman get them, likes this new version.
(1) Stevenson
deliberately left out both the definite article and the periods after the
abbreviations for doctor and mister from his title. His original publisher followed his
whims. Most subsequent publishers have
not.
(2) Brian Bowman looks like Jon Cryer, who, prior to his role as Alan on Three and a Half Men, was best known as
“Duckie” in John Hughes’ 1986 “Brat Pack” teen rom-com, Pretty in Pink. An
interesting bit of trivia, although as completely irrelevant as this entire
footnote, is that Charlie Sheen, Cryer’s co-star in Three and a Half Men (and earlier in Hotshots), was the original choice for the role of Blane, “Duckie”’s
ultimately successful rival for the affections of Andie (Molly Ringwald) in
this film, a role that ended up going to Andrew McCarthy.
(3) See
this
article from The
Interim. It is worth noting that a
serious effort to clean up the schools would have to involve more than just
repealing Kathleen Wynne’s curriculum.
I was in Toronto for a wedding almost ten years ago, while Dalton
McGuinty was still premier. On the ride
back to Pearson International, my driver, a recent immigrant from somewhere in
the Middle East, struck up a conversation.
When he found out I was from Manitoba, he told me how lucky I was to be
living in a rural, conservative, province, where I did not have to put up with
the likes of Dalton McGuinty, who was making the schools teach sexual
perversions to young children. I didn’t
have the heart to break the news to him, that the NDP which was governing
Manitoba at the time was just about as bad, although they had not taken the
schools quite that far. My point, however,
is that this conversation could not have taken place when it did, had McGuinty
not already started the schools along the path down which Wynne would take them
much further.
(4) Of
course there are those who have gone even further than Ford in this
absurdity. Dr. Brent Roussin has
limited social gatherings to five in Winnipeg and the surrounding region. Back in Ford’s own province, Patrick Brown,
his predecessor as PC leader and currently the mayor of Brampton, imposed fines
of up to $100 000 on those not practicing “physical distancing” as far back as
April. An orchard owner in neighbouring
Caledon was threatened with a fine that large by the Ontario Provincial Police in
late September for letting people pick their own apples on his farm.
Some China-style media management by the Trudeau PMO.
On the same day that Canada’s justice system showed independence and
commitment to the rule of law by being indifferent to CCP threats and
ruling on the Meng Wanzhou extradition challenge, Justin Trudeau appears
to be once again emulating the Chinese dictators he loves so much.
Rebel News reporter Keean Bexte was let into a Trudeau press
conference by security. And, considering a judge had ruled that The
Rebel had the right to report on the news just like anyone else, it is
of course the democratic right of Canadians to ask questions and report
on the PM.
Yet, when PMO stooges saw Bexte at the press conference, the Trudeau
RCMP dragged Bexte away, pushing some China-style ‘media management.’
This is incredibly disturbing and dangerous. The PM is using the
police to block journalists he doesn’t like from reporting on what he
says, which is of course totally anti-democratic and anti-Canadian.
China might approve of this kind of authoritarian behaviour, but it’s not supposed to work like this in Canada.
Once again we see that Trudeau wasn’t joking when he said he admired ‘China’s basic dictatorship.’
You can watch the video below:
“UNBELIEVABLE:
PM Justin Trudeau had me literally dragged out of his press conference
to avoid questions. I was officially let in by security, but when
Trudeau’s henchman saw me, the PMO sicced the RCMP on me. A journalist.
Democracy is dead in Canada. Vid: https://youtu.be/quLkAj5fYUE“
in mid-April, spontaneous anti-lockdown protests sprang up
across Canada. People attending expressed concerns about many issues, but the
attack on free speech was one of them. As reported last month, Privy Council President Dominic LeBlanc,
a close ally of Justin Trudeau, had
talked about legislation criminalizing spreading misinformation over the Internet about the coronavirus that could harm the public. As
contradictions in the government’s propaganda became obvious — at first, no
restrictions on travel from China (if you made such a proposal, you were a
“racist”)
and
the WHO said face masks do no good
— many began to suspect they’d been deceived. Canadians have been terrified
into accepting lockdowns, restrictions of their mobility rights, restrictions on
their right to earn a living or run a business and even virtual banning of
religious gatherings.
New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island restrict travel by
Canadians to their provinces. In Ontario, one Shanker Nesathurai, medical officer of health for Haldimand and
Norfolk counties issued a public health order (later rescinded when threatened
with of legal action) banning cottagers, under threat of $5,000 fines from
going to the cottages they own on Lake Erie. (National Post, May 16, 2020) The same issue of the Post showed a picture of
menacing signage at Port Stanley on Lake Erie: “Beach Closed. Restricted Area. No trespassing under penalty of
law!” So, people are banned from public beaches. Yet, sunlight helps
kill viruses. Everywhere, swaggering authorities treat Canadian adults like
morons, assuming they will not keep a distance from each other. These and a
host of other abuses and illogical restrictions have motivated thousands of
Canadians to protest. People are concerned about the arbitrary restrictions,
the crashing of the economy, the federal gun grab, and the possibility of
forced vaccination.
There have been
weekly protests in Vancouver and Toronto, Calgary, Edmonton, Ottawa, Hamilton,
and more recently in Kelowna. This list is only partial. The first Toronto
protest, April 25, which drew 50 people provoked an angry Premier Ford to
denounce the protesters, whom he hadn’t met, as “a bunch of yahoos” who were “reckless”.
His reaction is typical of many politicians who believe they should command rather
than listen respectfully to the views of those who elected them. Four weeks
later, the weekly Saturday protest had grown to 400 people. There were almost as many Red Ensign flags fluttering in the warm Spring sunshine as Pearson pennants. People shared many earned concerns — the loss of free speech, Trudau’s opportunistic gun grab, the fear of forced vaccination, and the general joyless herding of the population in a no service, neo-Soviet totalitarianism. Their signs help tell the story.
The Vancouver
“No more lockdown” protests began two weeks earlier than Toronto.
They started with 25 and by May 17, had swelled to 325. B.C. Health Minister Adrian Dix dismissed the protesters as people
with “marginal views. Don’t allow people who are attempting to
promote themselves by using the suffering of others to distract us. Don’t look
at them, but focus on what we need to do together.” (CTV,
April 26, 2020) A fellow NDPer Spencer
Chandra Herbert went further and seemed to want the police to charge or
ticket the protesters. Herbert, who is an outspoken lobbyist for homosexual
rights, is himself homosexual and “married” to one Romi Chandra, stated: “”I’ve
alerted the Ministry of Public Safety
for their information, and reached out to the Vancouver police who have the
responsibility for enforcing orders. I don’t want our community’s safety
threatened by selfish people who won’t do their part to stop COVID-19.”
In Kelowna, led by
longtime freedom activist David Lindsay
under the banner of CLEAR (Common Law
and Education Rights), “end the lockdown” protesters from
throughout the Okanagan Valley rallied in Stuart Park, opposite City Hall, on
May 7. Their numbers had doubled to 40 on May 16 and they plan to be in Stuart
Park every Saturday at noon until the lockdown ends, as will the Vancouver and
Toronto rallies.
“Sloppy” Joe Baconburger was the owner of a restaurant. It was an
independent eatery called the Celestial Carnivore. As you have
probably deduced it catered to a meat-eating clientele. Barbecue ribs,
steaks grilled to perfection, pork chops, and prime rib – these were
the staples of the supper menu. Its hamburgers, fried chicken and
chili con carne were all popular. The pizza section of the menu had but
a single entry and that was for “Meat Lovers”. The Carnivore was most
famous, however, for a sandwich.
This sandwich was a multi-layered spectacular. Forget the mere
clubhouse or even the triple-decker. This sandwich had separate layers
for roast beef, roast pork, roast turkey, and roast lamb. Each layer
also contained a hearty portion of ham and bacon and slices of various
sorts of cheese. If you wanted, vegetable fillers such as lettuce,
tomato, and cucumbers would also be added, but these were optional. It
was served smothered in chili and gravy. Naysayers called it “the
heart attack waiting to happen” but every day people would come from
near and far to order it.
One day something strange happened. Like any other day, “Sloppy” Joe
arrived at the Carnivore early, pulled into his parking spot, got out of
his car, and headed towards the door. Then he ran into a wall. Or at
least it felt like a wall. Whatever it was he could not see it.
There was nothing there to the visible eye but something was blocking
his path to the entrance.
Baffled by the invisible barrier and uncertain of what to do about it,
“Sloppy” Joe turned around and took a step in the direction of his car.
He was unable to go any further, however, because he found his path
impeded yet again by the unseen wall. Turning to his left and right,
he discovered that he was boxed in on all sides.
Uttering something that need not be put down in print, “Sloppy” Joe
looked around and saw his neighbour Bob walking down the sidewalk on the
other side of the street. He called over to Bob, asking him to go for
help, but Bob just kept walking along. “Sloppy” Joe called louder, but
there was still no response. He then screamed at the top of his lungs
but Bob did not seem to hear him. Whatever was keeping him from
leaving or entering his business was apparently also trapping all sound.
Eventually Bob looked around and saw “Sloppy” Joe at which point
“Sloppy” Joe began to gesture as best he could within the confines of
his transparent cage. Bob shook his head and said “Better stick to
cooking Joe, that pantomime act is never going to sell.”
Soon thereafter one of his employees arrived for her morning shift.
She waved to “Sloppy” Joe and said hello as she moved toward the
restaurant entrance but did not seem to notice anything was amiss. When
she got as close to the door as “Sloppy” Joe was, however, a look of
surprise came over her face and then, as she turned in all directions,
one of panic. “Sloppy” Joe realized that she was trapped too. One by
one, his employees showed up, and each in turn got trapped within an
invisible box.
“What will happen when my customers start to show up?” “Sloppy” Joe asked himself.
He did not have long to wait. The first customer, one of his regulars,
showed up like clockwork at the time the restaurant normally opened its
doors to the public. He too found himself stuck between the
mysterious unseen walls. The same happened to every other customer
that arrived after him.
Before long the area around the restaurant was surrounded by people,
trapped in place by invisible boxes. There was approximately six feet
of space between each of them.
All of a sudden, a loud maniacal cackle came descending upon them from
above. Looking up, they saw a man standing on top of the restaurant,
holding a device that resembled a cross between a machine gun and a
video camera. Groaning inside, “Sloppy” Joe recognized the man as Dr.
Tofu Veggiebrain the notorious mad scientist and leader of an animal
rights/environmentalist activist group that wanted to make veganism
mandatory and which had been targeting him and his restaurant with
harassment of various sorts for years.
“How do you like my latest invention, ‘Sloppy’ Joe?” Dr. Veggiebrain
asked. “I call it the Insta-Mime. Soon you and all others who murder
and eat our animal brothers and sisters will be trapped between
invisible walls in the world’s most despised form of performance art
forever.”
It looked like he might be right. Within an hour the police, fire
department, and other emergency services had been called in and they
could find no way of releasing anyone from the invisible boxes. The
police wrote “Sloppy” Joe and each of the others a ticket for breaking
the by-law against public displays of pantomime and then took off.
Soon, however, word of the strange impromptu mime session outside of the
Celestial Carnivore got out and within a couple of days it made its way
to the Marshmallow Monks (1) in the Carpathian Mountains. They
immediately contacted “Eddy” Johnson who rushed to the scene as Reaction
Man, (2) battled Dr. Veggiebrain, and freed everyone from their
invisible prison. Since this is not an actual episode in The
Adventures of Reaction Man but merely an essay illustration in which he
makes a cameo appearance, I will not elaborate on the details, but will
instead skip ahead to the aftermath of the trial of Dr. Veggiebrain.
After Dr. Veggiebrain was convicted criminally, “Sloppy” Joe filed a
civil action against him to recover the losses his business suffered
over the period in which he, his employees, and his customers had been
mimed. It was not difficult to obtain a ruling in his favour for the
law on the matter and the principle of natural justice underlying that
law are quite clear. If you deliberately harm somebody else’s business
he is entitled to compensation.
Things became complicated, however, when Dr. Veggiebrain said that he
would not contest the ruling and would gladly pay the damages – but only
on the condition that the Celestial Carnivore sign a statement of
agreement with his vegan values and convert to serving only plant-based
food.
Whereas most judges would not agree to such a stipulation, “Sloppy” Joe
was unfortunate enough to have Justice Bob Baddecision of the Ontario
Inferior Court hear his case. Judge Baddecision, who as we know is a
close friend of Lucy himself and is prone to live up to his last name,
(3) considered Dr. Veggiebrain’s stipulation to be entirely reasonable,
and ordered that it be carried out.
You have likely already figured out the point of this story. Therefore I will make my commentary brief.
A man’s business is his livelihood. If your actions are demonstrably
responsible for harming or destroying another person’s business, by the
laws of natural justice you are required to compensate him for this
damage. You do not get to hold the compensation to which he is
entitled hostage until he meets your demands. If you attempt to do so
you are guilty of a form of blackmail or extortion.
Over the past two months many people have seen their businesses suffer
to the point of insolvency. This was not due to substandard goods,
poor service, or other faults of their own. Nor can it be attributed
solely to causes which are outside human control and for which no human
agency can be held responsible. The coronavirus did not destroy these
people’s businesses. Government ministers and their health officers
did with their mandatory social distancing regulations, shelter in place
orders, and lockdown of so-called “non-essential” businesses and
services. This is why these businesses are entitled to government
assistance at this time. Such assistance is not a “bail out” nor is it
socialism, although it will have the same long term effect as these of
saddling generations to come with an unthinkable tax and debt burden.
It is certainly not the government being compassionate, no matter how
much Captain Airhead tries to dress it up in these terms. It is the
government paying compensation for damage it has itself inflicted.
This is why the government has no right to impose a values test on the
small businesses that apply for such compensation. Since the
government put these businesses in danger of bankruptcy, justice demands
that the government pay restitution. As the party that has committed
the injury, the government does not get to hold back this restitution
until the party that has sustained the injury agrees to support abortion
and the alphabet soup agenda. Its values test is a form of extortion.
Don’t let Captain Airhead get away with it.
Paul Fromm warns us about the Canadian Liberal
Party considering making it a Criminal Offence to Knowingly Spread
Misinformation about just the coronavirus or what? Paul has been the Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression since 1983.
CAFE is dedicated to Free Speech, Immigration Reform, and Restoring
Political Sanity. The website can be found at http://cafe.nfshost.com
Paul lives in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada and you can contact him at paul@paulfromm.com .
He has been an active leader on the Canadian right for 50 years and
has a steel trap memory so he is a treasure and resource of information
and history.
In
an effort to further mitigate the spread of COVID-19, Prime Minister
Justin Trudeau has invoked the Quarantine Act requiring those returning
from abroad to self-isolate. Ontario’s former information and privacy
commissioner says if deaths increase exponentially the government could
enact measures to track cellphone data to further limit the spread.
“Let’s
say the number of COVID-19 [deaths] in Toronto or Ontario tripled.
Maybe they would use that as the excuse or a reason needed to invoke
it,” Ann Cavoukian said in an interview.
“I
don’t know because I don’t want to think about it. I don’t want my mind
to go there. But I would think a dramatic increase would possibly get
them doing that.”
As
of March 26, there are a total of 13 deaths reported in Ontario that
are related to the coronavirus; there are 35 deaths in the country.
During
a press conference on March 25, Trudeau indicated that the government
was “not taking measures” like collecting anonymous cellphone data to
track the spread of the virus.
“We
recognize in an emergency situation we need to take certain steps that
wouldn’t be taken in a non-emergency situation, but that is not
something we are looking at now,” Trudeau said. “But all options are on
the table to do what is necessary to keep Canadians safe.”
Cavoukian said that Trudeau said nothing was off the table because he is aware of these rules.
“There
are, unfortunately, privacy laws that can be invoked by the government
that will enable them to engage in behaviours that wouldn’t be permitted
under the [privacy] act. All privacy acts have these kinds of emergency
measures, they’re supposed to be a last resort,” she said.
“They’re supposed to be time-limited, clear sunset clauses, full transparency associated with what the government is doing.”
Cavoukian
said that she didn’t think we were at that point yet for the prime
minister to invoke rules and said “we should never get to that point.”
“When
you are collecting all the personal information of citizens that just
encroaches upon their freedom without privacy,” she said.
Toronto Mayor John Tory initially said the city was collecting anonymous location data already, as first reported by The Logic, but later retracted his statements. A spokesperson clarified in an email that Toronto was not collecting any data.
Bell,
Telus, Rogers, and Shaw Communications’ Freedom Mobile confirmed in
emailed statements that they have not been approached by the City of
Toronto to gather cellphone data.
Jesse Hirsh, president of Metaviews, said in an interview that these measures should have already been invoked.
“I’m
surprised that they have not already collected anonymized location
[data]
because given that both the federal government and the provincial
government over the last few days have been escalating language around
voluntary self-isolation, this would be one way to verify and find
evidence instead of the government guessing,” he said.
“I’d
rather the government instead of guessing that people are or are not
complying. I’d rather that they have accurate evidence.”
He
added that collecting this data raises privacy concerns but they’re
“minor privacy concerns” as this data is helpful in terms of informing
public health policy.
Hirsh
noted that if the government drafted policy they would be able to work
with the Privacy Commissioner to ensure the protection of the data and
how it would be used.
“We can have our cake and eat it too,” he said. “The expertise exists within the federal government.”
Stephanie
Carvin, a security expert and assistant professor at Carleton
University, doesn’t think these measures will be taken any time soon and
most likely would be taken at a later date when things have restored
back to normalcy.
“You would almost want to implement something like this if the situation improved and we had an open society again,” she said.
“Let’s
say if you were able to flatten that curve and then over a period of 18
months, you’re waiting, and all of a sudden there are flare-ups in the
country and you want to contain it. That’s when something more targeted
might be useful.”
Carvin
indicated that even if the government were to take these measures it
would require a lot of moving parts and individuals to get on board to
make it happen.
“People think that there’s some kind of switch we can flick, and it’s not that easy,” she said.
She
also added that even if the government were able to track the data,
they would have to be explicit in terms of what they were collecting and
how it was to be used.
“It’s just not clear to me, how that would be done, by who, under what circumstances,” she said.
They said David wasn’t “accredited”. Really? David’s been an accredited journalist for 30 years — he’s covered hundreds of political events from parties of every stripe.
Why would Scheer kick out David, but welcome the CBC — who despise the Conservatives?
None of this makes sense.
Anyways, David left the property. He went to the public sidewalk. He started filming a video about being kicked out. And then he was swarmed by police.
And this time, they arrested him and handcuffed him.
Why did they do that?
Who ordered them to do that?
He as on the sidewalk.
He’s a man in his fifties with two artificial hips. He’s not a screaming Antifa thug; he’s not a trespasser.
They handcuffed him. Why? To humiliate him?
They finally took off his cuffs and he called me. But then more police came and took away his phone. I immediately called a lawyer. Within an hour, the police let him go, without any charges.
But their point was made: don’t you dare try to ask questions of our political elites. Or the police will arrest you.
Well, point not taken.
I can tell you one thing: today’s outrageous treatment of David Menzies will not stop us from doing our jobs.
I’ll be candid, we’re more used to Justin Trudeau banning us — and Rachel Notley before she was fired by voters. It says more about them than it does about us. Actually it does say something about us: we ask questions that politicians would rather not be asked.
Can you please help us? We need your help.
There are three things you can do:
1. Tell your local conservative candidate that this is nuts.
It’s a Trudeau move, not a conservative move. Ask your Conservative candidate if they think it’s wise to have police arrest the only conservative-leaning video company in Canada. Frankly, no reporter of any stripe should be arrested. This is Canada.
2. Second, sign our petition to Andrew Scheer atLetUsReport.com.
It’s just what it sounds like. Let Us Report — just like Scheer lets the CBC report. We need to show him that Canadians — especially Conservatives — believe in free speech and freedom of the press. Maybe he’s been hanging out in Ottawa too long to remember that.
3. Please help us keep on reporting, no matter who kicks us out.
I just got off the phone with David, and I’ve told him to keep asking Andrew Scheer questions. Not gotcha questions, but real questions — the kind the CBC would never ask him. Questions like these:
• Justin Trudeau’s campaign platform calls for new political censorship of the Internet. Do you support or oppose this? • If elected, would you end the $600 million newspaper bail-out? • If elected, would you privatize the CBC? • What do you think the optimum number of immigrants is each year for Canada? • …and so many more.
Those aren’t trick questions. They’re questions any conservative should answer. But they’re questions that only Rebel News would ask. I mean, can you really see a CBC journalist pressing Scheer about ending the bail-out?
My goal as the publisher of Rebel News is to do journalism — to tell the other side of the story. Most of the time, that means asking accountability questions of the Liberals, NDP and Greens, because the mainstream media never does.
We lean conservative here at Rebel News, and we wear our heart on our sleeves — we want Trudeau gone. I just wrote the best-selling book called The Libranos: What the media won’t tell you about Justin Trudeau’s corruption. I think it’s clear what I stand for.
But that doesn’t mean we’re going to let Scheer become like Trudeau. Having police arrest David Menzies was a Trudeau move, not a move any conservative should be proud of. Actually it’s worse — I’ve never actually seen Trudeau have someone arrested, have you?
You can help us at LetUsReport.com. Sign our petition to Scheer to let us report. And then you can click on the link on that page to see all of our campaign plans and our budget there. We’re spending thousands of dollars flying David and our other journalists around the country, covering political events.
Andrew Scheer might think he’s at war with us, but we’re not at war with him. We just want to be able to do our job — and we will, whether he likes it or not.
So help us out — visit LetUsReport.com to sign the petition to Scheer. And if you want us to keep on going, and if you want Scheer to stop acting like Trudeau, you can chip in a few bucks, too. Please click here to help us out.
Thanks.
Let’s remind Andrew Scheer: he’s trying to replace Trudeau, not become him.
Yours truly,
Ezra Levant
P.S. Please sign our petition at LetUsReport.com. I always worried about a government crackdown on our free speech. I just never thought it would come from the Conservative Party.