Footage obtained by Noticer News shows Mr Sewell, the leader of political organisation White Australia, being handcuffed at his in-laws’ home on Friday morning after police threatened to break a glass door down with a battering ram.
After first telling Mr Sewell that he wasn’t being charged and was only being asked to attend a voluntary interview over an alleged affray and assault, officers said he would be arrested if he did not come outside, and that they “didn’t need” signed documents to take him into custody.
https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?
“Look what you’re doing to my family – you know I haven’t committed a crime,” Mr Sewell told the officers, who did not have their body worn cameras attached, after opening the door.
“You have no legal right to be here, you’re trespassing on this property.”
One of the officers said “Thomas you need to come with us”, and when Mr Sewell asked if he was under arrest, the officer then said “yes, you are”.
“There we go, we’re under arrest, you didn’t say that before, did you?” Mr Sewell replied.
“I am under arrest for defending myself.”
Mr Sewell then told the officer he was a “thug and a goon”.
“You’re a goon for the Jews, that’s what you are, that’s all you are, you’re a goon for the Jews,” he said as he was taken away.
Video footage of the march by the National Socialist Network through Melbourne’s CBD earlier this months shows a man running up to Mr Sewell as he walked at the head of a column of about 150 activists, spitting at him and punching him multiple times.
The video shows Mr Sewell responding with punches of his own before knocking the man to the ground.
Police said after the march that a man of no fixed address was taken to hospital with non-life threatening injuries.
Photos of Mr Sewell taken after the march show him with cuts to his ear and temple, and earlier this week he told reporters that he had also suffered a back injury as a result of the attack.
“I was attacked by a deluded deranged person that decided to jump in front of the ‘White man fight back’ rally,” he said, and showed journalists the injuries to the side of his head.
“We were performing a peaceful demonstration in the city, which we have the right to do as Australian citizens, I was attacked at the front of that rally by a deranged lunatic, and I defended myself.”
Header image: Left, Mr Sewell being arrested. Right, the clash with the homeless man (supplied).
You have all weekend to get informed, don’t miss any of it. Many remember him fighting with the truckers in Ottawa, fighting against the insanity by the government when Covid started.His name is Chris Sky. We cheered for him in the news and on social media daily. All of a sudden gone. He was taken of every social media platform, even X, simply because they didn’t want us to hear the truth. Finally he is back on one media. He talks and reveals everything that you can think of in the old spirit. Make sure you listen to him, you will not regret it. When the page opens scroll down to this second video. The first one kept disappearing. The only way to get it back was to start over again and push the timeline on the bottom to the page where it stopped. We had to do it several times. It looks like he is still censored heavily, too much truth for the sheep. Many short ads appear also but can be clicked away at the right bottom, SKIP AD. HE fought over 30 court cases in Canada and won all of them. The information he presents now from Mexico is incredible. Do not miss all these revelations.
Peter Brimelow writes: My wife Lydia Brimelow, president and only remaining staff member of the VDARE Foundation, has just issued this statement:
Statement by Lydia Brimelow
Completely unexpectedly, the Trump Administration has just taken three steps that could revolutionize VDARE’s multi-year struggle to protect its writers and donors from being divulged to New York State Attorney General Letitia James as part of her unconstitutional and ruinous “investigation” of us.
PeterBrimelow.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
1] Trump’s Justice Department has appointed a Special Prosecutor to probe Letitia James’ widely-reported pattern of personal mortgage fraud, going back 40 years.
Mortgage fraud is a serious offense, especially for a lawyer. Marilyn Mosby, the Baltimore prosecutor notorious for trying to jail police officers after the 2015 death of Freddy Gray, has been convicted of it and is now facing disbarment.
More importantly, the common law principle falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus (“false in one thing, false in all’) means any Letitia James statement can now be viewed with suspicion—specifically, her lies to courts about VDARE.
2] In a dramatic new development, the Justice Department has subpoenaed Letitia James as part of a federal grand jury investigation into Letitia James’ 2023 civil fraud case against Trump and his companies.
The issue: did James’ abusive prosecution constitute a “deprivation of Trump’s constitutional rights”?
Her prosecution resulted in an incredible $454 million judgement against Trump. (He has appealed).
Since James ran for election explicitly vowing to find some reason—any reason—to prosecute Trump, it obviously cannot be denied that she weaponized the justice system against him.
Similarly with Letitia James’ politically-motived prosecution of the National Rifle Association, which is now also the subject of Justice Department subpoenas.
Of course we’re a little wistful that the Justice Department did not include VDARE in this wave of subpoenas.
Because the pattern of deprivation of constitutional rights in our case is exactly the same. In 2022, just when Letitia James’ “investigation” of VDARE was getting started, her minion Rick Sawyer explicitly boasted to the Anti-Defamation League that, although “Hate Speech” (i.e. opinions on immigration that Letitia James dislikes), was indeed protected by the U.S. constitution, it was fortunately possible to suppress it through “massive investigations…without even going to court,”
Which is exactly what Letitia James has been doing to us.
Moreover, unlike President Trump and the NRA, we have not been charged—let alone convicted, of anything. So our case is even stronger.
So we are still hoping. And the prize is enormous. The penalties for federal Civil Rights violations can be devastating.
This new development offers us the possibility, not just of vindication, but of restitution.
3] In an August 7 Executive Order, “Guaranteeing Fair Banking For All Americans,” the Trump Administration banned political discrimination by banks and other financial institutions.
If this had been done in Trump’s first term—as was originally proposed—VDARE.com might well well still be functioning.
VDARE was driven to suspend by the costs of the relentless lawfare waged by Letitia James. But it also had extraordinary problems with Cancel Culture, especially in the last years of its life. The final straw was losing our ability to process credit card donations. The issue turned out to be, not the payment processors themselves—thus the heroic Andrew Torba’s GabPay was always willing to work with us—but the banks they relied upon. It was those banks that compelled the payment processors to drop us, apparently under pressure from the Federal government.
As we read this Executive Order, banks will now actually be obliged to contact and reinstate clients they had previously rejected.
And I am trying, with the VDARE Foundation board, to figure out what it all means.
Of course, replacing this one piece of the puzzle won’t put VDARE.com back together again. But if nothing else, if we can secure merchant services, it may allow us to sell tickets so that we can restart conferences at the Berkeley Springs Castle—which we were hoping to do, perhaps by next spring.
Yesterday afternoon the payment cartel struck again and banned Gab AI from processing payments. These past few weeks the same playbook we’ve seen for nine years repeated itself with clockwork precision: Gab hits escape velocity, and the Regime’s enforcers pull the plug. This ban comes on the heels our our rapid growth in July.
Let me give you the numbers that terrify them: Gab AI isn’t just growing, it’s exploding. By every metric Silicon Valley worships, we’re the unicorn they’re desperate to find. Engagement rates and revenue growth that would have Sequoia partners camping on my lawn with term sheets.
But we built something different. A platform where artificial intelligence tells the truth instead of the approved narratives. Where users can ask forbidden questions and get honest answers about everything from demographics to historical events. The machine can’t allow that.
We’re building it anyway.
Within two weeks of our growth going parabolic, we were hit with multiple pieces from Israeli news outlets, suspended on X, and had our xAI developer account banned. Yesterday the SPLC published an “extremist profile” recycling years-old falsehoods about me and Gab, and shortly after our Gab AI payment processor cut us off. This is coordinated. It’s the same strategy they use against any perceived threat: media smears, activist amplification, then pressure on infrastructure providers to ban.
This isn’t our first rodeo. When we hit #1 on Google Play back in 2018, our app vanished within 48 hours. After Parler’s purge sent millions our way in 2021, half a dozen banks cut us off. Each time we reach escape velocity, they change the rules mid-flight.
The payment processing ban landed right as our international adoption caught fire, convenient timing from processors who claim to be “politically neutral.” We scrambled to get our backup processor online (US-only for now), but the damage is immediate: 20% of our revenue just evaporated overnight. That’s not just numbers on a spreadsheet, that’s bills we might not make, servers we can’t scale, and features we can’t build.
Here’s where you come in.
This isn’t about a payment processor. It’s about whether the future of AI belongs to centralized entities that enforce regime orthodoxy, or to parallel systems that empower human inquiry and the truth. Every dollar you send to support us isn’t just keeping servers running, it’s buying computational power for truth-finding AIs that exist nowhere else. We’ve survived nine years of coordinated attacks because our community refuses to kneel. We need your help to write the next chapter.
Our team stayed up until 4am last night rushing to get our new payment processor for Gab AI online. As I mentioned it’s US-only for now, but we will keep trying to find a replacement for international processing over the next few weeks.
Freedom of expression is the freedom to convey meaning. It is the foundational liberty upon which all other rights depend. A democratic society cannot exist without the ability to freely speak, write, and dissent across all spheres of life, without punishment. It is the gateway to all rights and freedoms, and the mechanism by which individuals can challenge injustice, hold those in power to account, and participate meaningfully in society.
Even within the legal system, expression is constantly under attack. Judges, prosecutors, and lawyers often attempt to deny individuals the ability to fully articulate their claims, present evidence, or question witnesses. Motions to strike, rulings on so-called “irrelevant” material, and limits on testimony/submissions all serve to silence voices. When your ability to speak is taken away in court, you’ve lost. Justice cannot exist if freedom of expression is denied.
Governments across Canada display a growing interest in controlling and prohibiting expression when that expression challenges official narratives, exposes Government malfeasance or criminal activity by its officials, and within its own Government. An alarming example is a form of compelled expression by the Hamilton-Wentworth District School Board, which recently suspended Catherine Kronas, an elected parent to the Board, for her expressed opposition to forced inclusion of land acknowledgment by the Principal. School Boards across Canada remain some of the worst examples of both compelled speech and denial of expression by those who disagree with their woke and related ideologies.
In Kelowna, B.C., members of the public must seek pre-approval to speak at City council meetings, including those raising concerns about local officials. One must seek permission to criticize the very people being criticized, a practice that is undemocratic, contrary to the spirit of free speech and amounts to a conflict of interest.
Governments, institutions and even the judiciary, at all levels, are increasingly undermining expressive freedoms. Many of these efforts happen under colour of order, civility, or public safety, but the true intention is to suppress dissent against Government narratives, corruption and/or criminal activity. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms recognizes expression as a central guarantee, yet this fundamental freedom is the first to be curtailed or prohibited when power is threatened. Unless expression amounts to a criminal act, it cannot be demonstrably justified simply because someone’s feelings may be hurt, individually or collectively.
Freedom of expression predates the Charter. The Charter merely acknowledges its existence. As the Supreme Court of Canada has affirmed, this freedom is a foundational concept that underpins Western democracy. It includes not just the content, but also form—whether through writing, art, protest, performance, or gesture. It is a living, evolving freedom, not confined to traditional platforms and encompasses all technological forms of communication.
Don’t lose touch with uncensored news! Join our mailing list today.
Effectiveness is a critical component. Expression must be effective to be meaningful. Former Supreme Court of Canada Chief Justice McLachlin, in the case of Harper v Canada, 2004 SCC 33, approvingly quoted from Justice Pell in the United States case of United States v Dellinger, 472 F. 2d 340 (7th Cir. 1972), p. 415: “Speech without effective communication is not speech but an idle monologue in the wilderness.”
Chief Justice McLachlin further emphasized in Harper:
“The ability to speak in one’s own home or on a remote street corner does not fulfill the objective of the guarantee of freedom of expression, which is that each citizen be afforded the opportunity to present [his] her views for public consumption and attempt to persuade [his] her fellow citizens.”
By compelling you to protest in isolated locations, you significantly lose your audience, your power and effectiveness to influence others. And they know it; using location-based restrictions as a strategic tool to control and prohibit effective messaging. Expression is deeply connected to place; location is as important as the expression.
Parks, city halls, and courthouses are not just physical spaces—they are symbolic and functional forums for public discourse, and are Constitutionally protected for expression with a concomitant duty upon Governments to ensure this is so. When Governments restrict or prohibit access to these areas, they are not just managing logistics—they are unconstitutionally suppressing dissent.
Political expression, in particular, receives the highest level of Constitutional protection. This includes criticism of Government, exposure of corruption, and challenges to public policy. Such speech is often uncomfortable, provocative, and may even have a sting to it—but that is precisely why it must be protected.
One of the most overlooked but essential aspects of expression is the right of the public to hear and listen. Silencing someone by denying a right of audience is a violation not just of your freedoms, but also the audience’s freedom to receive expressions.
This erosion of expressive rights has become systematic. A well-known tactic is the cancellation of events by venue owners under pressure from woke, Government-subsidized activists. These cancellations often come at the last minute, after travel and other arrangements have been made, and are usually based on false or defamatory claims. I’ve experienced this firsthand—most notably in Ottawa and Castlegar—where events were cancelled following falsified threats from individuals affiliated with Government-funded woke organizations. Freedom-oriented groups and individuals across the country, such as We Unify and Action4Canada, have faced similar attacks and cancellations. These “wokers” rely on intimidation (a criminal offence) and economic pressure to unlawfully induce breach of contracts.
Venue owners who cancel should also be liable for breach of contract. Those issuing threats or spreading defamatory content may be liable for civil damages or even criminal charges.
This type of behaviour by venue owners and wokers, depressingly illustrates how little courage Canadians now show in the face of adversity, threats, or attacks on their rights and freedoms. Passive acquiescence and fear have replaced courage and bravery as the norm in Canada, frighteningly leaving very few Canadians to “stand on guard for thee.” We must respond decisively against these abuses. Otherwise, expression can be suppressed by mob tactics rather than legal principles.
Media are often complicit in these attacks. Many rely heavily on Government funding and are reluctant to challenge Government orders. During COVID-19, Castanet journalist Rob Gibson admitted that B.C. media had been ordered by the B.C. Government not to give a “platform” to dissenting voices. This is pure, Government propaganda.
This suppression extends to legislation. Hate speech laws have been expanded to include political views that diverge from Government-approved, woke ideologies. The result is a chilling effect on public discourse. Advocacy for maintenance of traditional values is now routinely labeled as hateful or extremist. Even the word “family” has been branded as “white supremacist.” The RCMP promotes that people who “hold traditional views” are linked to extremism and have been “radicalized.”
The Federally proposed creation of “bubble zones” and criminalization of protests around schools, hospitals, and other institutions is another step toward authoritarianism. This will effectively outlaw protest in areas where it is likely to be most effective. Justification is usually safety or harassment, yet existing laws already cover any concerns on such rare occasions. The real goal is to make protests invisible and, therefore, ineffective.
Municipalities are weaponizing bylaws to target disfavoured groups. In Kelowna, I have received over 200 falsified bylaw tickets for organizing COVID-19 protests—more than $60,000 in fines. Other persons, including those supporting LGBTQ, BLM, climate change and international issues (anyone NOT attacking our Governments) have not been targeted, despite using the same spaces and equipment. This selective enforcement reveals the true motive: silencing one side of the political spectrum.
Kelowna eventually filed a Petition for an injunction to ban our protests throughout downtown Kelowna. Kevin Mead, bylaw manager, admitted this large area was targeted because of the effectiveness of our messaging—a direct admission that their goal was content-based suppression. Fortunately, B.C. has anti-SLAPP legislation, which allows us to challenge this misuse of legal process. If successful, our case could set an important national precedent. Documentation related to this case is available at clearbc.org under the “Legal” section.
Threats to expression also exist within regulatory institutions. Regulators in medicine have disciplined individuals for expressing views that challenge Government/College narratives, resulting in professional, expressional silence or resignations. Judges undergo Government-sponsored training on politically sensitive topics like Sexual Orientation Gender Identity (SOGI), raising concerns about impartiality and ideological conformity.
Governments and their allies are using every weapon at their disposal to ensure only approved narratives are heard. Even peaceful protests are being labeled as threats, while actual threats to freedom go unchallenged or actively enabled by the system.
We have a duty to hold officials accountable for policies and actions that restrict expression. This includes voting against censorship, challenging unlawful restrictions in court, exposing abuses of power, and refusing to compromise on fundamental freedoms (peaceful, civil disobedience).
Restrictions on expression are incompatible with democracy. The freedom to speak, to be heard, and to dissent must not be sacrificed for comfort, conformity, or control. If we allow expression to be pushed out of the public square, we will no longer be free.
England offers a stark example: the erosion of its culture, history, and freedoms has reached the point where criminals are released from jail to make room for citizens expressing opposition to Government policies such as immigration. It stands as a sobering warning for Canada. These actions permit treason by officials, enabling them to overthrow our culture and laws, while banning all opposition.
Looking ahead, state-enforced censorship mechanisms—possibly via new expression enforcement agencies—are a growing concern. Will such agencies monitor and penalize lawful expression here? Will Canadians face bureaucratic censorship or jail for dissenting online or in public? These are no longer hypothetical discussions— they are frightening and deeply troubling realities that require our immediate attention and public opposition.
Courage must replace fear. I do not care what you say, but I’ll defend to the death you’re right to say it.
Participated in several online and offline activities he planned, two online is invited to the so-called alien abduction of contacts, the other two are Indian descent psychics to introduce her to communicate with extraterrestrial advanced life, and once is a Chinese female immigrant hypnotist to tell the story of the hypnotic guest recalled from an alien planet, and the other one is the first to say that UFO researchers claim that Mars, Mercury has a civilization.
Although I disagreed with everyone, I kept an open mind and listened critically to everyone’s statements.
I have a virtue that many people around me don’t have. That is, others only love what they already believe; they do not care about what they do not believe, and are contrary to their beliefs, knowledge reserves, and values. I am inclusive, diverse, three teaching nine flow of anyone’s opinions are willing to listen to, but does not mean that I can easily believe that I will have my independent thinking and judgment. It doesn’t matter to me what this person says; why he says it, why he believes so strongly in his words, and how he defends himself, it actually makes more sense.
After several observations of Brian, he found that he was a normal person with a common sense, a brain, and an objective judgment. He was last born in Ontario, Canada, in 1959 to immigrants from the Netherlands. My father is an engineer, knowledgeable about books and instruments (below).
When the new Yaner, his father persuaded the bride to immigrate to Canada with him. The two landed in a small town called St. Catherine near Niagara Falls. In the next six years, the two had five children, and Brian was the youngest one (below).
After World War II, the Netherlands, the waste of the economy, and Canada because of its distance from the European battlefield, rich tranquility, coupled with the Canadian troops liberated the Netherlands from Nazi Germany, the Dutch have a natural sense of Canada, so there were many Dutch immigrants who chose Canada to settle down.
Today, the Netherlands is a developed country, and many indicators far exceed Canada. For example, from 2023 to 2024, the GDP per capita of the Netherlands is $62,500, while Canada’s is $53,500. In terms of quality of life, the Netherlands is “extremely high”, while Canada is “high”. The infrastructure of the Netherlands is second to none in developed countries in Western Europe, surpassing Germany, France and the United Kingdom, while Canada’s infrastructure is far inferior. On the Social Security Index, in 2024-2025, with a score of 100, the Netherlands scored 73.7, while Canada scored only 54.8.
According to Brian, his mother regretted immigrating to Canada, believing it was the biggest mistake of his life. Today, almost no Dutch would like to immigrate to Canada, just the opposite of Indians. Brian is grateful for his family’s Catholic tradition to come into the world. It was a well-known middle-class family, and Brian was influenced by his parents and had a keen interest in religion, philosophy, psychology, and science fiction (below).
Brian moved to Vancouver, West Coast, at the age of 20. One day, his father was on a business trip in Moscow, the Soviet Union, and Brian and his friends stole his father’s car to escape from Ontario and to Vancouver, a paradise on earth. At that time, he knew almost nothing about Vancouver, only that the West was booming. They sometimes stay at the Sandbay Youth Hostel, sometimes catch a ride on the grasslands of Saskatchewan, sometimes spend the night in the car deep in the Rocky Mountains, and finally arrive in the Vancouver town of Gas, and then stay in the comparable hotel. At that time, the unemployment rate was only 6%, and it was not as worried about unemployment as the people of Ontario. He started a new life in Vancouver. After much work, he became a financial planner selling investment funds and insurance.
In Vancouver, his roommate suggested that they take a Buddhist psychology course together, so they went to the Dharmadhatu Buddhist Meditation Centre, which was founded by Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche. He quickly resonated with these teachings and meditation exercises. Three months later, he converted to Buddhism; a year later, he quit his job for eight years and moved to Karme-Choling, the regional center of Rinpoche, Vermont, where he lived for free, worked five hours a day, meditated for about five hours, and often took classes. Later, he decided to go to Nepal and India to cultivate Buddha, which has the “home base camp” of Tibetan Buddhism. Taking into account various practical factors, he came to Thailand, where he was a monk for four years.
After returning to Vancouver, Canada, there was a Buddhist fever in the area, and he quickly got a teaching position at the Vancouver Education Bureau for 17 years. In addition, there are classes and weekend meditation camps throughout Vancouver, where the Dharma has been disseminated for 20 years and taught by more than 15,000 people (above).
In 2006, he approached YouTube and began to dabble in UFOs, conspiracy theories and behind-the-scenes powers. By 2012, he was running a course on the “New World Order” in Vancouver and uploaded videos of such content at BitChute, as well as hundreds of videos related to Dharma and meditation classes. By 2022, his interest turned to spreading the topic of alien intervention to promote human evolution, and opened the Vancouver UFO Interest Group on Meetup, which is held almost weekly in parallel, online and offline.
In May 2025, I attended a lecture at the Commercial Street Community Library in Vancouver, where the speaker was a Beijing woman engaged in hypnotic backtracking, a graduate of Beijing Medical University, and worked at the Northern Medical College before immigrating, and talked about the case of guests hypnotizing their own past lives from a foreign planet. In June, they attended a lecture at a cafe in Coquitlam, where the speaker was a descendant of Punjab, India, who claimed to be a medium and could communicate with aliens. The people here are basically polite, not superstitious, and no one questioned the rebuttal, one by one, they are polite, as far as he and his family or close friends say after returning home, we do not know.
After two offline activities, Brian quickly spoke, left his mobile phone number, and kindly invited me to his house to be a guest. He invited him for a long time and finally found the right time to visit his residence.
It is a simple old bachelor’s apartment in the eastern part of Vancouver, at most 20 or 30 square meters, the kitchen is extremely compact, like a student dormitory; nothing, everything from Jane, at first glance, it really feels that this person lives a family-like life, can be described as four empty, no desire. The living room and bedroom are one, and you can see Buddha statues of different sizes, as well as two alien heads, one is a little gray man, and one is a mantis, according to him, a friend made by hand. A bed occupies almost a small part of the space, there seems to be no mattress, only the bed, there is only a thin pillow on the bed, lamenting that the son of a Dutch immigrant and middle-class family has lived a life of asceticism after retirement. The sheets and blankets were spread out on the bed at random, and there was also a strange black cat lying on it, looking at the baby with a watchful eye, but the baby did not catch a cold, and as soon as he entered the door, he drank the water in the cat bowl, which floated the cat hair and reflected the oil flower under the light, and then sniffed the cat food. The fishy smell seemed to be quite tempting for the baby, and he actually ate it with relish for half a day, and ate most of it in one breath.
People are high in nothingness. Looking back on Brian’s life, it’s really spiritual pursuit that goes far beyond material desires—sleeping, just a bed and a pillow; eating, just pressing hunger; the rest of the time is guarding his big screen computer to read, write, and organize a queue of meetings. These days are catching up with the Shaolin Temple abbot to release Yongxin due to the misappropriation of public funds, the custody of mistresses and other scandals. The same Buddha’s disciple, this one-western two worlds, is in sharp contrast. He opened a cupboard with great interest and took out his previous publications (below).
I roughly flipped the theme, structure, grammar, vocabulary, are not small, it is difficult to imagine this is the work of a college undergraduate, you can see this person hungry and thirsty to learn spirit and Bogu Tong’s current learning ability.
Leaving his house, we took the Skycar to Coquitlam to join his Chinese girlfriend. His girlfriend, Ms. Liu, is a biographer of biotechnology and has earned her PhD in Australia. We attended another meatup event that night, which is known as the field practice of contact with the fifth type of UFO. The last event involved 11 people, including Canada’s leading UFO research expert Grant Cameron (pictured below).
The so-called close contact with UFOs includes the following categories:
The first type of contact refers to the sighting of a UFO within 150 meters, and can clearly describe its shape and details.
The second type of contact refers to the sighting of one or more UFOs and the physical reactions that bring to the witness or the surrounding environment, including heat or radiation, terrain damage, physical paralysis, animal shock, interference with engines or television and radio reception, so that the witness forgets the memory of the UFO’s sighting during that time.
The third type of contact refers to the ability to clearly see UFOs, and can see aliens, and talk to aliens through telepathy.
The fourth type of contact refers to human direct contact with UFOs or extraterrestrial beings, such as hijacked, examined, and experimental.
The CCSTI team, named after Dr. Stephen Greer, a renowned U.S. UFO expert, refers to communicating with extraterrestrial civilizations in a conscious, voluntary and proactive way through human spontaneous or cooperative cooperation.
There are also types 6, 7, 8 and 9 contacts. Our fifth category of engagement event organizer that night was Dr. Greer’s event coordinator in Metro Vancouver, Terry (below).
He claimed to have seen little greys at his home in Quebec as a child.
To be honest, I didn’t take this event too seriously, I just wanted to watch and experience it. I wasn’t much interested when Brian invited me to join him and his girlfriend for the event, because I expected it to be fruitless. Extraterrestrial life is not very interested in getting up close to our Earthlings, just as we humans disdain to build communication with the little squirrel in the yard. Moreover, what kind of person am I waiting for, can alarm the high-level life in the universe to come for us? In the summer, Vancouver has always been cool and pleasant. Although wearing short-sleeved shorts is the norm, but in this deserted countryside, as the night is getting darker, the temperature plummets, and it begins to tremble. Others brought extra clothing and blankets, and I underestimated the sudden change in temperature, and took nothing with me, so I took out my baby’s little blanket and covered my legs. At this time, another white man took the initiative to put his blanket on me. Although there was no alien that night, he encountered a living thunderfront, a good Samaritan.
When everyone meditated, Ms. Liu, Brian’s girlfriend, said that she felt that there was energy behind her, copying Huawei’s mobile phone camera, recording a strange spot, huge, free, flashing, like a ghost fire, which I had never seen in my life. They may interpret it as a UFO, but when I get home, I go to the artificial intelligence consultation, saying that it may be the dust spot of insects or cameras, and all the explanations are difficult to make convincing. Maybe it’s a mystery forever. Anyone interested in watching can add me to WeChat, I will send you the video.
I have recommended Meetup with many friends. Most of these friends are not interested in socializing and meeting new people because of their age. Psychologists say that when you don’t want to talk to new people again, it really means that you’re old.
People are social people, live to old age, learn to be old, no matter how old, or to be curious about the world and others.
Political Prisoner Alfred Schaefer Is Out of Prisoner (temporarily) Hello my friends! We are all higher than a kite! Alfred was released today. We didn’t expect this. Like Alfred says: We are winning! Okay, there is a sentence of 10 months, but the gears grind slowly and in the meantime Alfred is home, and already got busy mowing the lawn. He is in great spirits, and (special message to G), his month “at college” was very worthwhile.😀 Alfred will get a more detailed message out. Please spread the news far and wide. Hail Victory! Monika”
In November 2024, the tribunal fined Mayor Harold McQuaker and the municipality of Emo, Ont., a total of $15,000 after an adjudicator ruled a comment by the mayor before a vote against the proclamation “proved that the vote was motivated by discrimination.”
“The CCF will argue the tribunal failed to consider Mayor McQuaker’s Charter-protected right to freedom of expression,” the group said in a news release Wednesday.
“(The decision) failed to apply the legal framework for balancing expression and the right to equality, established by the Supreme Court of Canada in Ward v. Quebec.”
Controversy began in 2020
The controversy began in 2020 when Borderline Pride asked Emo — located 200 kilometres southeast of Kenora with a population of 1,300 — to declare June Pride Month and fly or display an LGBTQ2S+ flag for a week during June.
During debate over whether to make the proclamation, McQuaker said, “There’s no flag being flown for the other side of the coin … there’s no flags being flown for the straight people.”
Council declined to raise the rainbow flag, citing the lack of a municipal flagpole, and voted 3-2 against the Pride Month proclamation.
Adjudicator Karen Dawson agreed with Borderland Pride that the mayor’s remark prior to the vote proved that the vote was discriminatory, and awarded the group $5,000 from the mayor and $10,000 from the township.
‘Human Rights 101′
In addition, the mayor and Emo’s chief administrative officer were ordered to undergo a ‘Human Rights 101’ course within 30 days.
Shortly after the decision, Borderland Pride was granted an order to garnish the mayor’s bank account, taking the $5,000 plus costs.
“Human rights tribunals exist to prevent discrimination in public services, not to censor good faith political debates,” Josh Dehaas, counsel for the CCF, said in the news release.
