A TRAVESTY OF FAIRNESS: YOUR WARD NEWS, CANADA POST, AND THE CPCA REVIEW BOARD

Posted on March 1, 2019 by admin

POSTED MARCH 1, 2019
BY JAMIE CAMERON

Senseless and grotesque

Your Ward News (YWN) is a publication of unremitting offensiveness – in truth it is little more than a senseless and grotesque cartoon. Yet that is largely beside the point under the Charter. Though it took time and a concerted campaign by those offended by YWN’s existence, the law’s force was eventually brought to bear on its publishers. On May 26, 2016, the Minister of Public Works issued an Interim Prohibitory Order (IPO) under s.43(1) of the Canada Post Corporation Act (CPCA). This order banned YWN’s publishers, James Sears and Laurence Ste. Germaine, from using Canada’s postal service for all purposes, including the likes of letters to an MP, bill paying, and holiday cards. On January 24, 2019 – some 2½ years later – Sears and Ste. Germaine were convicted under the Criminal Codeon two counts of promoting hatred, respectively, against women and Jews.

The criminal prosecution and IPO directly engaged the constitutional rights of YWN’s publishers under s.2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. While procedural protections are embedded in the criminal process, the CPCA provides little more than gossamer fairness to anyone who challenges an IPO. Quite apart from the ban itself, the s.2(b) rights of Sears and Ste. Germaine were severely compromised by the CPCA process of review.

Intolerating freedom

In principle, s.2(b) protects all expressive activity, no matter how offensive or repulsive, as the very concept of freedom would be meaningless under any other view. Yet s.2(b) is too often a guarantee in name only: in practice, Canada’s democratic community shows scant tolerance for those who hold objectionable views and spread objectionable messages. Ironically, the community’s intolerance of such views fundamentally reflects an intolerance of freedom itself.

Instead, freedom demands and rests on an ethic of democratic humility, which can be thought of as a form of resistance to righteousness and a willingness to let unpopular others think, speak, and challenge, even and especially in radical ways or tones of voice. Regrettably, this virtue – both historically and at present – is in short supply. Rather, those who are feared or disliked are marginalized and their freedom placed in jeopardy.

In all this a vital point in discourse on expressive freedom can sometimes be missed – that freedom is as profoundly threatened by a defective process as by a prior restraint or criminal conviction. The point is well illustrated by the CPCA process.

A chronology of delay

In authorizing the Minister to issue prohibitory orders banning access to Canada Post, the CPCA pays minimal attention to process values. In this instance, neither the Minister nor the YWN Review Board was under any statutory imperative to comply with standards for a fair and timely process. As the Board put it somewhat backwardly, stating that “[t]here is nothing” in the legislation “which would compel the Minister to disregard Charter values when issuing an IPO”.[1]

A person who is subject to an IPO (“affected person”) can request a review of the Minister’s order. Under s. 44 the Minister has a duty to appoint a review board, though not to do so in any fair, timely, or expeditious manner. Here the Minister did not fulfill this duty until December 9, 2016, did not inform Sears and Ste. Germaine of the appointments, and did not announce the Board until January 9, 2017. The Minister never explained to the Board or the affected persons why it took more than 6 months simply to appoint a panel.

The YWN Review Board held its first hearing on April 25, 2017, about 5 months after being appointed and almost one year after the IPO was issued. The Review Board did not make a decision on preliminary issues until November 2017, did not hear submissions on the IPO until January 2018, and did not submit its Report to the Minister until August 29, 2018. All told, the Board’s review of the Minister’s IPO took almost 21 months to complete.

During this period, YWN’s publishers were under an interim ban not to use Canada’s national public service for any purpose, including those that were indisputably innocent. In addition, Sears and Ste. Germaine were put to the expense of appearing at and defending their constitutional rights in an extended process that granted YWN’s opponents full rights of participation.

Almost 30 months passed from the time the IPO was issued, on May 26, 2016, to November 15, 2018, when the Minister released the Review Board’s Report and issued a Final Prohibitory Order (FPO) banning the publishers from distributing YWN through Canada Post.[2]The key signposts in this chronology of delay are:

May 26, 2016 Minister’s IPO

June 6 & 9, 2016 Sears and Ste. Germaine request a review of the IPO

December 9, 2016 Minister appoints a Review Board

December 16, 2016 Sears and Ste. Germaine contact the Minister

January 9, 2017 Minister announces the Review Board

April 25, 2017 Review Board’s first hearing

August 9 & 10, 2017 Review Board’s hearing on preliminary issues

November 2, 2017 Review Board’s decision on preliminary issues

Jan 3, 22-26; Feb 26 2018 Review Board hearings

August 29, 2018 Review Board Report to Minister

November 15, 2018 Minister releases Report and issues FPO

Process matters

The YWN Review Board was handicapped from the start. Section 44(1) of the CPCA sets no criteria for panel membership, except to specify that one of three of its members must be a lawyer. Given the gravity of the issues at stake and level of public interest, the panel required expertise or experience in one or more of regulatory decision-making, the criminal law, and Charter of Rights and Freedoms. At the very least, the panel should have been assisted by counsel; had counsel been retained, the YWN Board might have avoided a protracted process and conducted a review that stood on firmer legal and constitutional ground.[3]

The Minister delayed the process by not appointing a Review Board in a timely way and was responsible for other delays and deficiencies. Though required to do so under s.43(1) of the CPCA, at no time did the Minister provide reasons for the IPO. The May 26, 2016 order simply stated that the Minister had reasonable grounds to believe that Sears and Ste. Germaine were using Canada Post to commit criminal offences (i.e. hate propaganda and defamatory libel). The Minister never provided the particulars of YWN issues or content that provided grounds for the IPO.[4]

The Board’s Ruling on Preliminary Issues found that the Minister violated her statutory duty to provide reasons and held that the breach of duty was not cured. At that point, the panel should have terminated the hearing, advised the Minister that her IPO was in breach of the CPCA, and informed her that the order could not legally be sustained.[5]The Board chose instead to deflect the problem, citing fairness to the interested parties – “participants would be denied a voice on topics about which many feel strongly”[6]– and faulting counsel for Sears and Ste. Germaine for changing her position.[7]The Ruling stated that the IPO is a serious matter, noted that the affected persons “are not given any opportunity to address the complaint except under this review process”, and acknowledged that that for the process to be meaningful they should be informed of the particulars of the Minister’s reasonable grounds. Having made those findings, the Board stated that the process would continue nonetheless, because the failure to provide reasons could be dealt with in the final report and recommendations.[8]

From that point on, Sears and Ste, Germaine could not receive a fair hearing. In the absence of reasons, there was no evidence of the grounds the Minister relied on in issuing the postal ban.[9]This made it impossible for the Board to reviewher decision and divine what grounds she could or might have had for ordering the IPO. Parenthetically, the Minister’s failure to provide reasons strongly suggests that she gave no consideration to the constitutional rights of Sears and Ste. Germaine, as she was required to do.[10]

In the absence of reasons or evidence from the Minister, the Review Board allowed interested parties to fill the gap. The Minister’s case for the IPO was made by others who were granted standing to support the IPO, and provided extensive written and oral evidence and submissions throughout. The Report plainly and explicitly relied on that work in concluding that the Ministerhad reasonable grounds to order the IPO.[11]

This unusual turn of events followed from the Review Board’s decision to recognize and grant standing to 16 individuals, 15 interested persons, and 10 community organizations and public interest groups. In this way, a review of the Minister’s decision was transformed into an open forum for YWN’s opponents to dominate the proceedings.

This “big tent” approach to CPCA review contributed to an unwieldy and protracted process. In practice, it imposed a burden on Sears and Ste. Germaine to respond to multiple parties and their interpretation of the criminal law – a burden that would never be imposed on them in a criminal setting. More fundamentally, the Board turned the process on its head, transforming a review of the Minister’s IPO for the benefit of the affected persons into an opportunity for YWN’s opponents to advance their interpretation of the Code’s hate propaganda and defamatory libel provisions.

Absolute ban and prior restraint

Throughout, the scope and gravity of the postal ban was minimized by the Attorney General and third party organizations who maintained that the IPO was not a prior restraint. Their logic was that because YWN could be distributed by other means the Minister’s IPO was not a restraint and did not violate the Charter. Such a claim misunderstands the nature and seriousness of a prior restraint.

Prior restraint is an egregious form of censorship that occurs when the state halts expressive activity, in advance, and to prevent it being communicated. In other words, the exercise of a right is pre-empted or blocked before it can be known whether or not the material – when published or distributed – will be constitutionally innocent or transgressive. The gravamen of prior restraint is an act of censorship by the state, which is exactly what the Minister’s IPO did by prohibiting Sears and Ste. Germaine from all use of the postal service. As a matter of law it was therefore irrelevant that YWN might be distributed elsewhere, like on Malta, the internet, or Mars.

The definition of a prior restraint is well established in law and the issue should not have been contentious. In the absence of expertise, the Board struggled with it and ultimately hedged, finding that s.43(1) “might” authorize a prior restraint and providing a muffled conclusion that, in the “narrow” context of the postal service, the standard was rigorous to ensure that IPOs are not issued “capriciously”.[12]Note, however, that the legislation presupposes the Minister’s compliance to give reasons.

The Board also found that IPOs are meant to be temporary – though that is not the way s.46’s statutory presumption works – and are subject to comprehensive review – but only when review is requested within 10 days and the Minister sees fit to appoint a panel. Despite those problems, the Board readily concluded that an absolute ban is not unconstitutional as an interim measure, adding that in any case the affected persons could have asked the Minister to consent to exceptions.[13]This, it bears noting, is the same Minister who did not provide reasons, delayed appointment of the review board, and failed to advise the affected persons when a panel was appointed.

Also minimized during the hearing was the severity of the interference with constitutional rights. The Minister’s IPO gratuitously banned Sears and Ste. Germaine from using Canada Post for personal and business purposes unrelated to YWN. Curiously, this issue was deflected to a side discussion of whether the CPCA granted the Minister discretion to narrow the order.[14]Actually, the point does not matter so much. If she had discretion, the IPO gratuitously violated the rights of Sears and Ste. Germaine by denying them all access to Canada Post for almost 30 months. And if not, the IPO was just as damning because the Minister issued an absolute ban without reasons and without apparent regard for the constitutional rights at stake. Either way the Minister’s IPO was seriously in breach of s.2(b) of the Charter.[15]

More important than a ban on the use of Canada Post was the shabby process that began on May 26, 2016 and did not end until November 15, 2018. This chronology of delay and irregularity is compelling demonstration that, without procedural fairness, the Charter’s guarantee of expressive freedom is little more than a façade or shell. Quite apart from the ban itself, the process surrounding the IPO was a travesty of fairness.

To the Review Board’s credit

The Review Board called attention to the Minister’s unexplained delay in appointing a panel but defended its own process as being beyond reproach.[16]As discussed, the Board made choices and decisions that extended and distorted the review process to the disadvantage of Sears and Ste. Germaine.

To the Board’s credit, the Report recommended that the CPCA be amended or regulations enacted to address some of the statute’s deficiencies. The Review Board’s action items include the time limit for the appointment of a review board, standards of proof (i.e., who has the onus at such hearings), and the remedial powers of the Minister under s.43(1) and 45(3).

A mandate for change

While helpful, the Board’s recommendations reveal a limited grasp of what went wrong in this process.

A primary concern arises from the framework for IPO and FPOs. By statutory presumption, the Minister’s order becomes final ten days after notice of an IPO is sent, without any further steps or process (s.46). In other words, the Minister can conclusively ban – or censor – a person from Canada Post simply by giving notice of the order. There is no right of appeal 10 days after a FPO is issued. Meanwhile, where an “affected person” requests a review of the IPO, the Minister is not required to appoint a review board in a timely manner or within any time frame whatsoever. At a minimum, the statute should require appointment of a review board within a specified time period, and should provide a means of appeal from a FPO.

Problematically, the CPCA provides little or no framework for the review process, leaving it largely to the discretion of an ad hoc panel that might not have adjudicative or subject matter expertise. In appropriate circumstances, it may be necessary and justifiable for the Minister of Public Works to issue an IPO or FPO. Yet the exercise of this rare and draconian power must comply with the rule of law, including standards of procedural fairness. For the Review Board to excuse the Minister’s failure to provide reasons and proceed anyway, granting multiple parties standing to address the core issues, and then decide those issues without evidence from the decision-maker, was manifestly unfair to Sears and Ste. Germaine. Though interim and final prohibitory orders are relatively infrequent under the CPCA, the YWN hearing showed how a process can go awry when an inexperienced panel is required to manage a complex process in the absence of procedural framework or direction.

The CPCA’s provisions on prohibitory orders have not been amended since the Charter was enactedin 1982. These provisions are grossly deficient to manage the administrative and constitutional elements of a review process that in many cases will affect constitutional rights. Tinkering and modest reforms will not be sufficient; what is called for, instead, is an overhaul of the CPCA’s provisions for making prohibitory orders.

[1]Report and Recommendations of Board of Review (Report) at 33 (my emphasis).

[2]Under the FPO, Sears and Ste. Germaine may use Canada Post for personal purposes but are banned from using the postal service to distribute YWN or other “substantially similar” material.

[3]It is rumoured that the Review Board was informally assisted by a law professor; if this is true, it was not disclosed to the parties and is yet another troubling irregularity in this process.

[4]On March 21, 2017, the AG provided the names of individuals who might have been the subject of defamatory libel, and on January 3., 2018, almost 20 months after the IPO, the Attorney General advised that the alleged hate propaganda was against Jews.

[5]The author and CFE took the position throughout that the Minister’s failure to give reasons was a fatal defect and determinative of the proceedings; in the circumstances, we nonetheless participated in the hearing on the constitutional issues.

[6]Ruling on Preliminary Issues at 7.

[7]It is unclear whether the Board misunderstood counsel; even if it was aware of her position that the hearing should be limited to the constitutional issues, the Board would have heard the evidence and submissions on hate propaganda. As the Report declared, “the Board [was] not prepared to limit its report to constitutional issues only”. Report at 11.

[8]Ruling on Preliminary Issues at 6, 7.

[9]Apart from the preliminary issues and constitutional submissions, the Minister did not participate in the proceedings.

[10]See Report at 37 (stating that the absence of reasons was problematic, adding that the Board was not able to determine whether the Minister turned her mind to the issue of balancing Charter values and, if she did, whether she concluded that no balancing was required or intended the IPO to reflect a balancing exercise).

[11]Report at 15-19; 20-22; 44-45; 47.

[12]Report, at 37.

[13]Report, at 38.

[14]The author and CFE took the position that the IPO was a prior restraint and absolute ban; we did not participate in discussion of the Minister’s discretion to narrow the order and offered no view on the issue of statutory interpretation.

[15]The Board incorrectly concluded that the duty to balance Charter values under Dorédid not apply to a blanket ban; the Minister had a duty under the Charter to balance constitutional values whether the IPO imposed an blanket or partial ban on access to postal services.

[16]Report at 13.

Amazon Bans Black History Books During Black History Month

Posted on March 1, 2019 by admin

March 1, 2019

Amazon Bans Black History Books During Black History Month

By Michael Hoffman

https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com

On Feb. 17 at the United Center in Chicago, before a cheering crowd of black Muslims numbered in the thousands — and who knows how many viewing around the world via webcast — this writer lauded the Nation of Islam’s three volume The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews as “magisterial revisionist history.”

Nine days later, on February 26, after having been offered for sale on Amazon for several years, these three books were suddenly banned for “violating content guidelines,” an apparent euphemism for offending the Holy People. Coincidence?

Until such time as alternatives to Amazon (and independent libertarian platforms for podcasting) are created, the Tech Tyranny, as Ron Unz indicates (see below), will march on amid the stark media silence concerning the censorship of history books which Zionists and Talmudists detest. This is indeed a sinister Orwellian state of affairs. Public exposure of the censorship and the hypocrisy that informs it, is essential for the survival of freedom.

Jeff Bezos, who founded and owns a controlling stake in Amazon, also owns the Washington Post whose motto, flaunted in a virtue-signaling 2019 Superbowl commercial, is “Democracy Dies in Darkness” — the same darkness in which the Nation of Islam’s documented history of Judaic control of the black slave trade in the western hemisphere, has been consigned.

Ron Unz writes:

“First Amendment liberties are now being increasingly circumvented on the Internet by utilizing the corporate monopolies that control that means of communication”

During the 2016 presidential race, it was widely anticipated that Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush would be the contending nominees, fiercely battling each other on hot-button partisan issues while quietly standing together on War, Peace, and the Economy. Such a race would surely have been soporific and vacuous to the vast majority of the general public. The sudden and totally unexpected populist rise of both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump fractured this projected narrative, and Trump’s election shredded it.

Although the most extreme Neocon elements soon regained control over the foreign policy of the Trump Administration, America’s ruling ideological establishment was horrified by the close call they had suffered, and began an unprecedented attack upon the Internet and dissident publications and writers, with mass bannings, harsh censorship, and widespread “de-platforming.” The most utterly ridiculous accusations—suggesting that Ron Paul was a Russian agent of influence—soon began echoing within the corporate media, and many alternative websites were cowed into trimming their dissenting sails lest they suffer severe consequences.

Many critics were jubilant over the recent closure of The Weekly Standard, the Neocon organ most heavily responsible for the disastrous Iraq War, they have misunderstood the reality of the situation. With so many similar Neocon ideologues now firmly ensconced on the editorial pages of the New York Times, the Washington Post, and every other major newspaper, Bill Kristol’s former publication no longer had any real role to play. I think a case can be made that with the exception of a few zealous Trump partisans here and there, the establishmentarian American media landscape is more totally unified than it has been for decades, especially with regard to foreign policy issues, and dissenting voices never so unwelcome.

When a country’s ruling elites are highly unified but fearful of maintaining their continuing power in the face of popular discontent, harsh crackdowns are a natural consequence, and America’s widely enshrined First Amendment liberties are now being increasingly circumvented on the Internet by utilizing the corporate monopolies that control that means of communication.

During the 1950s, any proposal to ban suspected Communists from making telephone calls, watching television, or having bank accounts would have been ridiculed as utter lunacy, but in today’s America, equivalent actions are steadily growing more frequent and more severe.

With so many vibrant alternative publications having been brought into line and so many once raucous comment sections now strictly policed by strict identity registration requirements or eliminated completely, our webzine (www.unz.com) has gradually become a much bigger fish in the rapidly shrinking pond of free thought on the Internet.

We shall see whether the angry flapping of our contributing writers achieves any result before the “Powers That Be” complete their total evaporation of all remaining intellectual freedom in the Western world.

For Further Research

http://www.unz.com/announcement/gaining-ground-on-the-new-republic-the-nation-and-foreign-policy/

Hoffman’s Speech to the Nation of Islam

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3M9OphGs-e8

Louis Farrakhan on True and False Jews in the Book of Revelation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAX9fpStzUs&t=57s&frags=pl%2Cwn

Michael Hoffman’s Essay: “My Service to the Nation of Islam”

https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2019/02/my-service-to-nation-of-islam.html

Today’s Hoffman Wire is online here:

https://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2019/03/amazon-bans-black-history-books-during.html

Released Political Prisoner Monika Schaefer Concludes Successful 11-City, 13-Talk Tour of Canada

Posted on February 28, 2019 by admin

Released Political Prisoner Monika Schaefer Concludes Successful 11-City, 13-Talk Tour of Canada

On February 10, the 11-city, 13-talk, cross Canada speaking tour by recently released political prisoner Monika Schaefer concluded before an enthusiastic audience in Calgary, Alberta. Sponsored by the Canadian Association for Free Expression, Monika’s tour took her to London, Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton, Winnipeg, Regina, Victoria, Vancouver, Penticton, Edmonton and Calgary.

Image may contain: 1 person, standing, shoes and indoor

Despite A Meeting Venue Being Cancelled, Monika Schaefer Addresses A Packed Meeting in a New Vancouver Location. Here is Monika’s talk.

Posted on February 28, 2019 by admin

Despite A Meeting Venue Being Cancelled, Monika Schaefer Addresses A Packed Meeting in a New Vancouver Location. Here is Monika’s talk.

On Friday, January 25, the cowardly management at the Best Western Capilano [here’s their number — (604) 987-8185 ] got a few critical phone calls and cancelled our meeting without notice. We secured a new venue and had a standing room only meeting Sunday afternoon.

Hear Recently Released Political Prisoner, Monika Schaefer — MY STORY: MY TRIAL, MY “CRIME” & 10 MONTHS IN A GERMAN JAIL — Vancouver, Sunday, January 27, 2019

The Canadian Association for Free Expression Proudly Presents

Monika Schaefer “Unbowed & Proud

* Violinist, environmentalist, former Green Party candidate

* Free Speech activist; holocaust & 9/11 skeptic

* Videographer; former political prisoner in Germany (10 months for her video, Sorry, Mom, I Was Wrong About the holocaust)

My Story: My Trial, My “Crime” & 10 Months in a German Jail

https://www.bitchute.com/video/T2mwtBN493Q/

The Subtleties of Outrageousness

Posted on February 24, 2019 by admin

The Subtleties of Outrageousness

I want to explain my strategy about how I get my message out on video with The Brian Ruhe Show. If I were to talk to someone and explain my views, they would get upset and I would grow weary, as the Buddha said was his concern. My views are outrageous to people who are not awake to how the world really works.

Fortunately, I can happily express myself at length on a video and thousands of people will sit and listen to me, while I don’t have to listen to them. This is a dream come true, fulfilled by YouTube! I can be subtle because no one can interrupt me as I am alone when I videotape a well thought out lecture.

Over 100,000 people have patiently and very impatiently listened to and watched my videos. I will never know how they react and how I affect their lives. I merrily whistle down the sidewalk while they scream at my image on the computer screen. In person, people walking past me on the sidewalk don’t know me at all so I live in peace. Jesus said, “I have come to turn brother against brother.” I cause bitter fights within families as I sleep well at night, drifting off to dreamland with a satisfied smile on my face, recollecting the video I released that day. Only the internet has given me such power. I am 100 times more influential than I was 20 years ago when I was teaching Buddhism to 20 people a day at Douglas College.

The Buddha taught right speech. The internet makes us much more karmicly responsible for our words because our power is multiplied in space and into time. Centuries from now we could be influencing people with a YouTube video that we produced this year. Such power staggers the imagination so use it responsibly. I believe that I do but my critics would laugh at such a brazen claim. I have contemplated at the subtlest level of my thought, my influence on my video audience and I am acting as responsibly as I can with regard to what is expedient, with my limited means and the crises in the world that I tend to everyday.

I have been aware of walking the line since my flow of videos began in 2011. I have tried to avoid too much fame in my home town while my target audience is the rest of the world. I don’t get to know the residents in my apartment building and I don’t discuss my job with them. I keep a low profile in my neighbourhood. There are men in the US and Germany who obsessively express their hatred for me, in writing, in my video comments. I take refuge in my deep religious devotion for the Buddha, dhamma and sangha. I keep my friends close and my devas closer. I believe that the karmic merit of my actions is 1000 times better than when I was teaching Buddhism in night school. My aspiration is to take rebirth in Tavatimsa heaven with a modest celestial mansion, beneath Sakka’s retinue of the thirty-three. My conviction in my own rebirth keeps me going each day. Who can deprive me of my next life?

On March 17th, 2013 I already accepted my death when I started these inflammatory videos. It is 2019 and my actions over the past six years have earned me far more merit than the previous 53 years. I share that virtue with all the unknown white guys who built this wondrous internet technology.

Like Mara above our heads, I have had the worry, the resignation and the challenge of being watched by the Rothchild, Zionist, Talmdic establishment, all these years. It’s a foggy intuition I have had about if and how I have been protected or left vulnerable as a sitting duck. Accepting death makes me a man with nothing to lose. The three most dangerous people are the king, the pope and the man with nothing to lose.

We live in a children’s world. 97% are like children. I grow stiller and stiller. After a day in the street interviewing reactive normies, I stand with Gary Mitchel eyes and feel my chi energy surging as the next inspiration descends and co-mingles with my mind. Since childhood I took the Star Trek image of Gary Mitchel from the pilot episode, with glowing eyes, as a visualization practice of enlightened mind and power. The Buddha taught to visualize a confidence inspiring object and this is one that I use.

Technology enables the peaceful and subtle communication of the outrageous. Because of the power within the internet that I choose to seize, life is worth living more than ever before. I want to stick around as “this gig is getting interesting,” as my colleague Diane Chase says.

Live long and prosper in wisdom,

Brian Ruhe

Three Rebel journalists have been assaulted in three weeks. Enough is enough — we’re fighting back, and we need your help

Posted on February 24, 2019 by admin

Three Rebel journalists have been assaulted in three weeks. Enough is enough — we’re fighting back, and we need your help

Assault on Keean Bexte

Our Calgary reporter, Keean Bexte, was assaulted by a leftist activist while he was covering the United We Roll pro-pipeline convoy in Ottawa.

Keean covered the official speeches by the United We Roll folks. But as we do, we like to cover what the critics say — often just because they are so inarticulate, it’s sort of amazing. So Keean was amongst the antifa just asking them for their views. And he was talking to one guy — the guy with the aviator glasses, when some other leftist thug sneaked up on him and just hit him.

Now, obviously, it didn’t deeply hurt Keean. But it was shocking. And it damaged his phone. And more to the point — it was an assault.

This is him:

And the cops — just did nothing. In fact, worse than nothing — Keean told me that police, who were literally standing right there, police said to him if he wanted to make a complaint, he should call the police department. They were right there. But they couldn’t care less.

Assault on David Menzies and Efron

A couple of weeks ago, two other Rebel journalists were attacked. Again, they weren’t beaten to a pulp; I don’t think they were hurt; but so what — you can’t punch a journalist.

A manager at the Radisson Toronto East manhandled David Menzies, and our cameraman Efron earlier this month.

You can’t punch people. We were lawfully on that property; that Radisson manager then asked us to leave, and we were about to leave, Menzies even started to say he was leaving, but before that manager even finished his sentence, he just punched David and Efron, and punched our gear.

We filed a lawsuit in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, against the Radisson Toronto East hotel, and their manager David Strong, on behalf of our employees, David and Efron.

We’re not suing for millions. We know that they weren’t wounded for life. The money isn’t even the point — we’re suing for just $10,000 each, a total of $20,000. We’ll pay far more than that in legal fees. We’re suing to make a point — you can’t hit people. Even if you disagree with them. You can’t do that, whether your a person, or a multi-billion dollar corporation like Radisson.

Not the first time Rebel journalists have been hit

Of course, this isn’t the first time a rebel journalist has been assaulted. The worst was when some male feminist named Dion Bews hit our Sheila Gunn Reid — at a women’s march, no less.

The CBC actually took the side of the thug in their news reports, trying to humanize him and paint him as the victim. In the end, Dion Bews was convicted, but because of a court error, he got off with a slap on the wrist.

So we sued Bews in civil court for more than a year, and we finally got justice in the form of a court order.Here’s what the judge who upheld our lawsuit against that thug Dion Bews had to say:

Mr. Bews is entitled to his political views, and the Plaintiff and The Rebel are entitled to their political views. Mr. Bews however, was not entitled to commit assault and battery because his political views differed from those of the Plaintiff or The Rebel.

You can read the entire decision, here.

So we did that. It cost us more than $30,000 in legal bills. Bews had to pay Sheila just $3,500 and for the rest of his life he’ll be known as the cowardly male feminist who hits women.

Help identify the Antifa thug

If you can help identify the Antifa thug who hit Keean, then please email tips@therebel.media with his identity. We’ll keep you confidential. If you are the first to positively ID him, we’ll pay you $500.

Don’t take the law into your own hands. No vigilantism, please. Just tell us who he is, and we’ll do the rest — we’ll put him to the law, as we did with Dion Bews.

So this is him, two different perspectives. That’s who hit Keean. In Ottawa. So he’s probably from there. He seemed to be someone who protests a lot; he seems to be political. My suspicion is that he’s some public sector union thug who protests every day, and when he saw our people, he wants to do more than protest — he wanted to punch a conservative.

Help fund our lawyers

The second thing I need your help with is to pay for the lawyers.

If Sheila were a Liberal, if David and Efron and Keean were Liberals, not only would they not have been attacked, but if they were, police would take care of everything. They didn’t charge the Radisson manager, and they didn’t lift a finger in Ottawa. So, we have to pay for justice.

The lawsuit for Sheila cost us more than $30,000. It wasn’t about the money. It was about defending our people, standing up to bullies, and letting the world know that if you come for the rebel, we’ll come for justice. (By the way, David, Efron and Keean didn’t ask me to do this. I’m choosing to do this. Because I am grateful to them for suffering for our journalism, and because it’s right.)

I’m going to need $500 to pay the bounty to identify this thug, because the police don’t plan to investigate. And then I’m going to need $30,000 to sue him, and $30,000 to sue the Radisson.

Do you think that’s wasteful? Do you think that’s a luxury? I don’t. It’s my way of saying to Keean and David and Efron that I value them and I respect them and I want to treat them how I would want to be treated if I myself were assaulted by a left-wing thug.

That’s my goal — $60,500. If you can help me cover those legal bills, please do. I promise to keep you posted on the case.

This is part of the price of being a conservative in Canada. But I think we have to pay it. If you think so too, please help us out by contributing below.

Along With Ziocensorship, There is Anti-free Speech Lobbying from the LGBTQ Privileged Minority

Posted on February 23, 2019 by admin

Along With Ziocensorship, There is Anti-free Speech Lobbying from the LGBTQ Privileged Minority

LETTER FROM POLITICAL PRISONER ALFRED SCHAEFER TO POLISH AMERICAN PATRIOT BARBARA ANN NOWAK

Posted on February 21, 2019 by admin

[This letter is being re-posted in an edited form. This letter was published for information purposes and publication does not implyCAFE’s agreement with all of political prisoner Schaefer’s opinions. Apparently, there has been a complaint to the Hamilton Police. CAFE emphatically does not condone violence. In our opinion, a plain reading of the letter does not conclude that it promotes violence. Nevertheless, to clarify our intentions certain passages have been removed. — Paul Fromm]

LETTER FROM POLITICAL PRISONER ALFRED SCHAEFER TO POLISH AMERICAN PATRIOT BARBARA ANN NOWAK

Dear Barbara, Thank you so very much for your mail package which arrived here on Jan 2, 2019. Took over 1 month, from Nov 30. Things are moving extremely fast now as all the exponential processes catalyze each other leading to the inevitable super nova type event.

You wrote a great deal about Katyn. In the summer of 2017 I spent some time on the sailing vessel Mistral, as crew, sailing around the U.K.. For part of that trip we had a Polish professor on board, and this gave me the opportunity to have a lot of conversations with him about our history and what is happening in our world today. I talked about 9-11, he knew everything. Good. I asked him if he knew the Facts about Katyn. He said yes.

I asked him if he understands that Katyn was the systematic culling down of the Finest of the Polish men, the flower of the Polish people, the brutal murder of 22,000 of the Polish leaders, those men upon which the Polish people depend on for building the future?

Yes, he understood and knew that. I asked him if he knew that the Germans had nothing to do with that, as had been taught to all the “western” populations until the 1990’s. Again – he knew that.

I asked him if he knew that it was not the Russians, as had then been blamed after the Germans could no longer be blamed for it. Again – he knew that. So – did you understand it was the Jews following their agenda “The best of the Goyem Deserve to be Killed.” He knew that also. Then – the key question: You know that, you are a professor, but do the Polish People, do they know that? Without even flinching, he replied, “Yes, the Polish People know that.” That entire sailing trip was worth it for that one conversation alone, and there were lots of other similar encounters & conversations along the way. In Ireland, Scotland, England.

These are the conversations that energize me and prove that things are going in our direction. Remember, I too was a zombie. I always ask people at what point in time did they understand which parts of this matrix of lies and manipulation. For so many people, they started understanding things parallel to myself, they just don’t have the means or ability to articulate this or present it.

However, that is normal at this point in time for the general Healing for our people, our race, and our planet.

Now Barbara, I am going to tell you why I am very happy where I am, in prison:

1) Monika is out and very good and very strong to tell the world.

2) Our/my imprisonment works as an enragement generator & amplifier.

3)The “new Germans” out of Syria, Palestine, Turkey & wherever, that I had been working with in the laundry always showed me what they are being taught in “integration school”. The lessons consist of infinite praise for democracy – so perfect, so precious. Democracy is so tolerant, even men who think that other men’s bums are good for sex are tolerated & all very happy. To keep our democracy healthy we must not tolerate homophobes, nazis, and certainly not Holocaust™ deniers. Because we know that in 1933 evil Adolf Hitler took power and steered Germany away from democracy and planned to take over the world & he did the Holocaust. The memorials in all of Germany’s cities & throughout the world prove that the Holocaust was real, and deniers will NOT be tolerated in our tolerant democracy. And of course racists & haters will not be tolerated.

So all of these people were sharing this information with the racist hater & holohoax denier Alfred. And these students started discussing this with their teacher, and demanded to know why they are being taught such utter nonsense. They told the teacher they will give this course material to Alfred because he wants to help others by exposing this communist garbage. Well, the teacher forebode them to give it to Alfred. (they all know me) I think the teacher panicked, was probably fearful of losing her job if she does not show dedicated subservience to her Jewish paymasters. Anyway, we had so many good laughs in the laundry department when reviewing the indoctrination lessons. …

4) The prison library has many good books, and fellow prisoners have made wonderful suggestions what I ought to read. Ernst Jünger who I never even heard of before, or Alexander Solschenizyn – Gulag Archipelego Vol 1&2, Day in the life of Ivan Denissowitsch and “Der erster Kreis der Hölle” – The first cycle of Hell. He hardly ever mentions the Jew, but we all now know, and he does mention the purging of any and all references to the Jew in Russian archives. Later on he did write “200 Years Together”, but that was predictably suffocated out of our awarenessss.

5) On the 11th of January I was given one hour to pack my stuff together to be moved into a different cell block. No more laundry work. Aw darn, I was having so much fun, and had lots of friends. But, maybe they saw that I need more time to write and wanted to help me. And there was a very very important subject I didn’t even want to mention lest it threaten a smooth running “operation”.

Before I go into this Barbara, your letter to me is PRICELESS. Thank you. You are one of my many Guardian Angels. Yes Yes – an investigation of 9-11. All we had so far was a fucking Coverup! Sorry to use foul language, but…

O.K. – take a deep breath – calm down. That’s what my new friend often told me. Dr. Thomas Dettmann CEO (Board of Directors) of Personnel for Audi Corporation. He was caught and tossed into this place in order to soften up Audi top level management in this latest round of EXTORTION! Yes, how to milk the fuck out of the Krauts!

Sorry, my foul language slipped out – please accept my apologies. I will try to keep myself under control.

All right, do you think for one moment that I would have had hours and hours of dialogue one on one with a German executive who reports directly to CEO Stadler were I not in prison? Who wrote this script? It can’t be true. It is true! To top it off Barbara, on 17 January 2019, I spent 90 minutes speaking with the Canadian Consulate so nothing is gained if (((They))) destroy this letter. This information is making the rounds. Is it not fantastic that your letter to me took so long? and then I was too involved to respond sooner, because today is the 18th of Jan. I could write an entire novel at this point, but I’ll keep it short. That cheap two-bit Jewish thug Larry Silverstein and his Jewish buddies defrauded Munich Re – or Münchener Rück for Billions of Dollars after (((They))) blew up WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7, which is not even mentioned in the 9-11 Coverup report that they thought would keep the traumatized Goyim quiet. Oh, Lucky Larry, that *** sorry, control myself.

On the computer that was “borrowed” from me by the German Police from Summer 2016 till April 2018, they (German Police) had 20 months to examine in detail what was on it. On the desktop of this computer easy to spot for any child who looked, was a 2 minute video of Lucky Larry gloating about the fact that he already had the plans for the new WTC underway in April of 2000. **April 2000 is 17 months before 9-11.** This gloating was as intelligent as the 5 dancing Israelis who were celebrating the Mass Murder of Americans on Sept 11, 2001 in New York – Documenting the “Event”.

Dr. Dettmann, when I finally managed to get him one on one, and he responded to my question of whether he knew Eustace Mullins with a solid YES, I knew we were half way there already.

Now do you understand why I am very happy to be in this place? As long as I don’t stay here for 6,000,000 years, its O.K.

This punishment is nothing at all compared to what all of our ancestors have suffered and what our people are suffering now as I write this. You know that, but the “Mitleser” or other readers need to know that.

Back to the Extortion of Audi. All these “Environmental Rules” are nothing more than part of an elaborate rigged game where we are being dealt marked cards, over and over again. The Jews will not stop doing this until they are stopped. Now they will be stopped! Dr. Dettmann from Audi understands all of this, so their attempt to “soften up a few heads” to extract a cool Billion or so may be their last game they played.

The Jews have us positioned within their matrix of extremely prejudicial laws that leave us without even the air to breathe. It is a death matrix. If we fail to now extricate ourselves from this death matrix, then we die. Our ancestors have dealt with these parasites before, and by God, we are up to it, easy, just have to wake up. That is the age we are in Barbara, the age of golden opportunity to do something for our people, something that ensures our survival. All the other races will love and respect us if we get this right. I could go on and on, but I’ll close this now and hope that it reaches you in less than one month.

Respectfully yours,

Alfred Schaefer

However, that is normal at this point in time for the general Healing for our people, our race, and our planet.

Barbara, over time & space, this dark point we now find ourselves in will be similar to when you catch a nasty flu. As your body is besieged by the disease, you feel like you are going to die, everything hurts, you feel hopeless. However, once your white blood cells figure out what the problem is, they develop a strategy, and they deal with the problem. There is no sentimentality here. Do or die. If they do – after they are done, you are healthy and stronger than before because of a new resistance to this disease.

By the way, I know not of a single case of white blood cells inquiring about the feelings of the bacteria that they need to deal with. And not one cell in your body asks, “where did all the bacteria go to?”

During Monika’s and my Inquisition I explained all these natural processes during my final words, and the so called judges – Jews of course – chose to ignore reality and in their infinite hubris think they can hide the truth. In fact, all the energy that (((they))) now invest into trying to keep the lies going, will provide the energy we need for the healing. A word comes to mind – Reciprocity.

After the “shock and awe” of understanding the history and the agenda of the Jew and us, the emotional condition develops that is a prerequisite for the Healing. Eustace Mullins had predicted a “biological response” to what is happening. He articulated this over 20 years ago.

[time chart showing the curves of “Awareness of Jewish Crimes against Humanity”, followed by “Emotional Energy growth required for healing”]

The biological response that Eustace Mullins was talking about would be similar to how your body deals with bacteria. No sentimentality. Only understanding the problem and resolving it.

Now Barbara, I am going to tell you why I am very happy where I am, in prison:

1) Monika is out and very good and very strong to tell the world.

2) Our/my imprisonment works as an enragement generator & amplifier.

The Palestinian guy thought it is too bad that I was in jail for making videos. I should have taken a knife and stabbed some Jew, because then we would have one less Jew, and for me it would have made no difference, since I am in jail for videos anyway. I told him, no no, my videos have sewn a lot of seeds, and soon 7,000,000,000 people will all have a deep desire to stab some Jew, and then they will all disappear anyway. (that is the biological response)