Viscount Portman Latest Victim of Britain’s Soviet-era Anti-free Speech Laws
Soon after the “Russian” Revolution, criticism of Jews was made a capital offence in the Soviet Union.
Free speech challenged Britain just sentenced a British aristocrat Piers Portman, to 4 months in prison & 20,000-pound fine for calling a Jewish persecutor of satirical singer & free speech activist Alison Chabloz “Jewish scum” outside of court. Negative opinions about certain privileged groups are definitely not allowed in Not-so-Great Britain.
Justifying the persecution of Alison Chabloz The third paragraph has the well worn ploy used to subliminally reinforce the years of conditioning, by putting into Alison Chabloz’s own mouth an indirect admission that homicidal gas chambers really existed, when in fact she was referring to the delousing facilities for clothing. Then to distract the reader from looking to closely at this slight of hand they jump to an unrelated, disjointed combination of a two word quote and an alleged reference to deportation. This tactic throughout the hit piece along with ad hominems play on the conditioned prejudices, undermining and neutralizing factual logic, not to mention rationalizing the blatant suppression of free speech.
Justifying the persecution of Alison Chabloz The third paragraph has the well worn ploy used to subliminally reinforce the years of conditioning, by putting into Alison Chabloz’s own mouth an indirect admission that homicidal gas chambers really existed, when in fact she was referring to the delousing facilities for clothing. Then to distract the reader from looking to closely at this slight of hand they jump to an unrelated, disjointed combination of a two word quote and an alleged reference to deportation. This tactic throughout the hit piece along with ad hominems play on the conditioned prejudices, undermining and neutralizing factual logic, not to mention rationalizing the blatant suppression of free speech.
‘I’m not sentencing you on the basis that you are anti-Semitic, I’m not sentencing you on the basis that you are a Holocaust denier,” said Westminster District judge Michael Snow, after doing exactly that.
This was Snow’s confusing message to 56-year-old Alison Chabloz, a political commentator who was dragged to court for stating that the Holocaust is an “eternal cash cow” on a podcast. She will be serving four and a half months in jail.
While Judge Snow has no legal basis for jailing a person specifically for comments critical of the Holocaust, he was able to exploit an open-ended and subjective “gross offense” law to punish Chabloz for comments questioning the Auschwitz gas chamber narrative and how the Jewish community uses the Holocaust story for political and financial gain.
The vaguely defined “gross offense” law is often exploited by political actors to suppress critics of privileged groups and powerful interests. A police officer is currently being tried in British court for the “gross offense” of sending a George Floyd joke in a private WhatsApp chat. Free speech in the United Kingdom is not a guaranteed right.
Snow’s treatment of Chabloz fits a pattern. Many believe the district judge is primarily concerned with being a thuggish proxy for the powerful rather than enforcing the law and protecting people’s rights.
One high profile example is judge Snow’s behavior while overseeing the Julian Assange case in 2019. In order to please the US Department of Justice, Snow ruled that the Australian journalist be held in custody to be tortured in solitary confinement at a high security prison.
During the trial — ostensibly over Assange jumping bail in 2012 — Snow taunted and berated the prisoner of conscience, referring to him as “laughable” and a “narcissist.” During one hearing, he demanded Assange “get over to the US” and “get on with your life.” Former ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray has referred to judge Snow as a corrupt, politically motivated “disgrace.”
The climate for open discussion and social criticism in Britain is virtually indistinguishable from third world totalitarian nations. Judge Snow and other high ranking figures in the UK know the public stigma of running kangaroo courts that imprison people based on what wealthy Jews say offends them, but in 2021, these “liberals” no longer care what the people think.
MORE SILICON VALLEY CENSORSHIP: TWITTER WOULDN’T LET ME POST THIS A Satirical Song, by British political prisoner Alison Chabloz, in response to Canadian gender/sex insanity law https://www.bitchute.com/video/BU8eBi7FeGqO/ The musical antidote to gender/sex insanity law.. WOTS MY IDENTITY ?
We will likely never know the real reason why District Judge Snow
instructed that my latest trial, originally scheduled to take place
March 30 and 31 at Hendon Magistrates, has now been transferred back to
Westminster Magistrates Court.
Prior to reversing the choice of venue, the judge was clearly at
pains to avoid any repetition of the “procedural nightmare” instigated
by my first trial (which lasted from December 2016 to June 2018,
followed by the hullabaloo with probation, including a short spell in
jail, later overturned on Appeal, all for composing and performing
satirical songs that were uploaded to the Internet, and that were deemed
by the same court to be “grossly offensive”). In all, I was in the dock
for less than an hour, then invited to sit in court whilst complex
directives for what is to come next were set out.
Left: outside Wesminster Magistrates last Thursday with barrister Adrian Davies.
There were three or four journalists in court. Below are links to
several reports (although the term must be applied loosely to the first
two).
“Blogger”, “music teacher”, “notorious” whatever… The inaccuracies
(and indeed one particular sentence that is clearly contempt of court)
are once again too numerous to mention. Likewise, my bail conditions
prevent me from defending myself against the slurs and general character
assassination.
As for the po-faced band of “charitable”
Inquisitors still pushing for my further persecution and prosecution,
they are now demanding “a sentence with real teeth.”
As Mr Millard notes in his most recent blog post, of relevance to my latest case is Thursday’s announcement concerning the Court of Appeal ruling on the “right to offend”.
In light of this legal precedent, if my trial does go ahead, at least
we will be safe in the knowledge that rules applied to other groups do
not apply to my accusers, (for whom vexatious prosecutions are
apparently a lifestyle choice), and that the rest of us must be silent
or else face the music – with real teeth.
Speaking of music, – far less tedious in my view than legal updates – I am proud to present my latest parody, Royal Variety style, just in time for Christmas. https://videos.files.wordpress.com/YwSkzwO9/anything-goes-ff-64-subs_dvd.mp4
Alain Soral, a right-wing French political dissident, was recently
sentenced to one year in jail for “insulting a judge” and making
“anti-Semitic” comments on his own personal website,
underscoring once again the threat the organized Jewish community and
their lackeys pose to the traditional Western concepts of free speech
and thought.
A French court sentenced far-right Holocaust denier Alain Soral to one year in prison for insulting a judge and making anti-Semitic comments on Soral’s website.
On the site, which is called “Equality and Reconciliation,” Soral wrote that Jews “are manipulative, domineering and hateful,” the French news agency AFP reported from Thursday’s sentencing at the Correctional Tribunal of Bobigny just northeast of Paris.
Soral, 60, has been convicted multiple times of incitement to hatred due to his anti-Semitic comments over the years. His previous conviction was in December in a defamation case. The Paris Court of Appeal slapped him with a $4,500 fine for producing and selling on his website a poster targeting Jews.
“We will continue to prosecute Mr. Soral as long as he makes anti-Jewish remarks,” said attorney Ilana Soskin, representing the International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism, which brought the latest complaint against Soral.
To be honest, I’m not too familiar with Soral or his views, largely
because I do not speak or read French. I do know he is often associated
with Dieudonné M’bala M’bala, an Afro-French “anti-Semitic” comedian and
political dissident that has also been demonized and targeted by the
organized Jewish community. I have written about the persecution of Dieudonné the past:
Once again we see the organized Jewish community
demanding political correctness and obedient, slavish acceptance of
their false, artificially manufactured version of WWII, as if the people
of France are incapable of thinking for themselves.
This is typical Jewish behavior: the Jews are always behind
tyrannical anti-free speech, anti-free thought measures. The Jews have
managed to enact “Holocaust denial” and “anti-racism” (read: anti-White)
laws in numerous European countries, literally criminalizing
independent thought and political expression – particularly for White
European peoples.
Whatever it is Soral recently wrote and said, it clearly has the
organized Jewish community in France – and I’m sure around the world –
typically howling and screeching for censorship, punishment, and
revenge. How dare a Frenchman question the Jews and their anti-White,
highly weaponized historical and contemporary narratives in 2019!
Tragically, we’ve seen one White dissident after another be targeted
and persecuted by the Jews and their puppets for simply expressing their
political and historical views. Soral is facing a jail sentence,
similar to the heroic dissidents across the West that have been
persecuted in recent years: Ursula Haverbeck, Monika and Alfred Schaefer, Alison Chabloz, Sylvia Stolz, and many, many others.
In the US, countless Alt Right activists and other pro-White figures
have been tyrannically persecuted by local, state, and federal
prosecutors simply for engaging in legitimate exercises of free speech.
The oppressive legal actions taken against these and no doubt countless
other pro-White, “anti-Semitic” dissidents are almost exclusively the
result of Jewish ethnic organizing and lobbying effor
Yesterday’s (10 January 2020) hearing at Derby
Crown Court was presided over by HH Judge Egbuna, who remarked that it
was “vital” to ascertain whether the decision of the National Probation
Service to press for prosecution
of Alison Chabloz on the ground of breach of condition had been taken
“professionally” or whether the decision had been a result of “political
motivation”.
The judge was informed by Prosecution
Counsel that the decision to proceed with a prosecution (and so trial
for breach) was not taken or initiated by Alison Chabloz’s probation
officer, as would be the normal situation; neither was that decision
taken by
his supervisor. It was the decision of someone above those levels.
Sounds as though the judge is seriously worried by possible interference in the judicial and quasi-judicial processes by someone or some organization…
The judge declared that Alison’s trial could
not proceed until it had been established on what basis or bases the
decision to prosecute had been taken, and by whom. The matter has now
been adjourned until 25 June 2020.
That, however was not the end of their manipulations for the day. Alison Chabloz was arrested at court and taken to Derby Police Station, where she was “interviewed” (interrogated) by detectives about a complaint made by someone. At length, late in the evening, she was given police bail until a date in mid-February, but only on the condition that she not post on her blog. That disgraceful “police-state” prohibition will, I apprehend, be challenged in court before very long.
Well, there we have it. A contrived
“complaint” with the sole (main) aim of preventing Alison Chabloz from
exercizing her right to free speech (which right “they” have almost
destroyed in the UK, aided by “me too” rabbits
on Twitter and elsewhere). What other objective? Well, I suppose that
it also inconvenienced Alison Chabloz, and their little minds love to do
things like that, as witness the false and malicious complaint the same
“people” made about me three years ago:
It is about time that the police and CPS woke
up to the fact that they are being manipulated and used by the “Campaign
Against Antisemitism” fake charity.
England has now become a country in which a police desk sergeant in deepest darkest Derbyshire can decide (was it really his decision?) not to allow a British citizen the right to post on the Internet! “They” have destroyed our freedom for their own tribal ends. — Ian Millard
Political prisoner Alison Chabloz singing her songs on a tour in Canada and talking about her life. In pathetic minority-ruled England, they jail singers, especially satirists.
Interestingly, for Jewish “comics” different rules apply.
Larry David pisses on a picture of Jesus… you’re welcomed to laugh.
Sarah Silverstein says she’d kill Jesus again if he had the chance… again, welcomed to laugh
Songstress Alison Chabloz Jailed for Two Months Under Pressure from the Jewish Lobby
The very powerful Jewish anti-free speech lobby and complicit courts have just sent Alison Chabloz to prison for two months for using the social media to update her supporters. Internet silence was one of the conditions for her suspended sentence last year for singing satirical songs about Jewish claims about WW II. In a ruling reminiscent of the RFed Chinese billing the family for the cost of the bullet to shoot dissidents, Miss Chabloz has also been assessed 175 pounds (about $230) “court costs.”
The Jewish lobby has a particular terms for criticism of Jews — “anti-Semitic tropes.” It is not a fantasy or our imagination. Here is the crowing self-congratulatory statement put out by Miss Chabloz’ Jewish tormenters revelling in their role in silencing her and in directing the courts to act against her.
Poor little Britain.
Moments ago, notorious antisemite and Holocaust denier Alison Chabloz was jailed for eight weeks, of which she will serve at least four. She was also ordered to pay court costs of £175 within 10 weeks.
District Judge Jonathan Taaffe found Ms Chabloz guilty of breaching the conditions of her suspended sentence after blog posts that she published since June 2018 were found to constitute a breach of a social media ban. Ms Chabloz was handcuffed in court to begin her sentence as her parents, who were in attendance, looked on. The trial in Chesterfield today follows contact between Campaign Against Antisemitism’s lawyers and the National Probation Service.
Last year, Ms Chabloz was convicted on three charges of sending grossly offensive communications via a public communications network. That case began as a private prosecution by Campaign Against Antisemitism, which was then taken over and continued by the Crown Prosecution Service. The charges related to three self-penned songs in which she denounced a supposed Jewish conspiracy to dominate the world and attacked the Holocaust as a fraud perpetrated by Jews for financial gain.
The conviction set a new precedent in British law, effectively delivering a landmark precedent verdict on incitement on social media and on whether the law considers Holocaust denial to be “grossly offensive” and therefore illegal when used as a means by which to hound Jews.
Ms Chabloz was sentenced to a twenty-week prison sentence suspended for two years, 180 hours of unpaid community service, an indefinite order against contacting two leaders of Campaign Against Antisemitism, as well as an order banning her from social media for twelve months. She was also ordered to pay a £115 victim surcharge, and costs of £600. Earlier this year, the conviction and sentence were upheld at Southwark Crown Court,. … Ms Chabloz has also been banned from entering France, where Holocaust denial is illegal, for forty years until 2059.
Stephen Silverman, Director of Investigations and Enforcement at Campaign Against Antisemitism, said: “We are delighted that justice has taken its proper course. Today’s trial follows contact between Campaign Against Antisemitism’s lawyers and the National Probation Service, and we are grateful for their cooperation. We hope that this sentence will send a message that antisemitism is unacceptable and that the courts will not hesitate to use the powers at their disposal to bring offenders to justice.”
