Internet Censorship Ramps Up as Second “White Nationalist” Website Has DNS Seized

Internet Censorship Ramps Up as Second “White Nationalist” Website Has DNS Seized
It now appears that the Jews in the USA have found a much better way of circumventing the U.S. Constitution’s freedom of speech laws. No long, drawn-out court battles in order to shut down someone’s website like what happened to me and my former site RadicalPress.com. Just transfer the right to censor out of the hands of the government to Jewish controlled private sector tech industries and bingo! any website criticizing the Jew agenda is potentially subject to the same injustice now being meted out to Stormfront and the Daily Stormer. 
 
What shall we do when we can no longer express ourselves publicly?
———

Internet Censorship Ramps Up as Second “White Nationalist” Website Has DNS Seized

Screen Shot 2017-08-29 at 10.09.26 PM.png
The ongoing program to censor the internet of all dissenting views took another step forward with the news that the “Stormfront” website—one of the oldest pro-white sites on the web—has had its Domain Name Servers (DNS) seized, only a few weeks after the “Daily Stormer” domain was seized in similar fashion.
Whatever one thinks of either of the sites in question, the precedent has now been set that any website, espousing any view, can be forced offline through this method—with apparently no recourse whatsoever.
“Stormfront’s” DNS is held by the Network Solutions company, and, as explained on that company’s website, a Domain Name Servers (DNS) is the “Internet’s equivalent of a phone book.” This server “maintain[s] a directory of domain names and translate[s] them to Internet Protocol (IP) addresses. This is necessary because, although domain names are easy for people to remember, computers or machines, access websites based on IP addresses.”
The DNS associated with a domain name translates it into a “machine friendly” IP address (which is a string of numbers separated by decimal points) and directs an internet connection to the correct website.
As shown on the “Whois” domain lookup service, Network Solutions has placed the “Stormfront” website’s DNS in a “clientDeleteProhibited; clientHold; clientTransferProhibited; clientUpdateProhibited” status.
According to the “Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which is the nonprofit organization responsible for coordinating the maintenance and procedures of several databases related to the namespaces of the Internet, a “clientHold” status “tells your domain’s registry to not activate your domain in the DNS and as a consequence, it will not resolve. It is an uncommon status that is usually enacted during legal disputes, non-payment, or when your domain is subject to deletion.”
The other status reports (“clientRenewProhibited,” “clientTransferProhibited,” and “clientUpdateProhibited”) all make it impossible for the legal domain owner to move or even access the domain. This is, without any doubt, pure theft of a legally-owned domain name.
This was also exactly what happened with the “Daily Stormer” website as well.
It is unclear whether this was the result of the domain registrar companies or of ICANN. The latter organization used to be under the control of the US government, but it was transferred into private ownership in late 2016—a move which has left the right to be on the internet in the hands of a handful of tech industry companies.
Ultimately, this means that any website, anywhere, could at any time, have its domain name seized by unknown and unseen people, and effectively be erased from the internet. It is an issue which goes far beyond “left” or “right,” and cuts to the very core of fundamental rights of speech and freedom of expression.
Clearly, the only solution to this matter is to put ICANN back under government control, in the same way that government issues driving licenses, building permits and so on. Leaving the right to determine who can, and who cannot, be on the internet, to the whim of a handful of big tech company individuals, is a highly dangerous step which can have ramifications far beyond a handful of “white nationalist” websites.

Tim Horton’s Censors Political Sights on WiFi Available to Customers

Tim Horton’s Censors Political Sights on WiFi Available to Customers

Until it was sold to Burger King, itself part of Brazilian multinational 3G, Tim Horton’s was an iconic Canadian institution.
 
Now, it appears to be censoring the websites, especially political websites, on the WiFi it provides for customers.
 
This afternoon, after being alerted by a colleague to this censorship, I checked it out for myself at an East End Toronto Tim Horton’s (Leslie St. and the Gardiner Expressway).
 
 
Tim Horton's Censors Political Sights on WiFi Available to Customers</p><br />
<p>Until it was sold to Burger King, itself part of Brazilian multinational 3G, Tim Horton's was an iconic Canadian institution.</p><br />
<p>Now, it appears to be censoring the websites, especially political websites, on the WiFi it provides for customers.</p><br />
<p>This afternoon, after being alerted by a colleague to this censorship, I checked it out for myself at an East End Toronto Tim Horton's (Leslie St. and the Gardiner Expressway).</p><br />
<p>Efforts to access Jered Taylor's American Renaissance (AMREN), Stormfront, America's oldest White Nationalist discussion board or Vanguard News, all resulted in a notice of "Access Denial".</p><br />
<p>"Access to this page has been blocked due to inappropriate centent." There's that vacuous politically correct catch all term "inappropriate." What does it mean? It means whatever the user has in mind. The poor customer seeking to access these sites is given no clue as to just how they are wrong or "inappropriate."</p><br />
<p>This is outrageous censorship of adult Canadians,</p><br />
<p>I urge Tim Horton's customers to protest. You can e-mail them at TimHortonsWiFi@timhortons.com</p><br />
<p>Paul Fromm<br /><br />
Director<br /><br />
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION
 
 
 
 
Efforts to access Jered Taylor’s American Renaissance (AMREN), Stormfront, America’s oldest White Nationalist discussion board or Vanguard News, all resulted in a notice of “Access Denial”.
 
“Access to this page has been blocked due to inappropriate content.” There’s that vacuous politically correct catch all term “inappropriate.” What does it mean? It means whatever the user has in mind. The poor customer seeking to access these sites is given no clue as to just how they are wrong or “inappropriate.”
 
This is outrageous censorship of adult Canadians,
 
I urge Tim Horton’s customers to protest. You can e-mail them at TimHortonsWiFi@timhortons.com
 
Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION
___________________
When CAFE’s attorney approached Tim Horton’s about this Big Brotherism and censorship, this was the snotty response from Tim Horton’s lead counsel.
Dear Mr. :In reference to your note below, let me respectively decline your
request to change the Tim Hortons Acceptable Use Policy as it relates
to wifi available Tim Hortons Restaurants.
As a private entity providing a wifi service to guests, it is our
contention that it is entirely appropriate to request that guest
expressly consent to be bound by the Acceptable Use Policy prior to
using the wifi service.  If our guests do not agree with the terms of
the Acceptable Use Policy they are free not to use the service.

Best regards,
Jon

Jon Domanko
Senior Corporate Counsel | Tim Hortons
226 Wyecroft Road, Oakville ON L6K 3X7
T: 905-339-6261 F: 905-337-5205 E: domanko_jon@timhortons.com