
Who does the election censoring at Facebook

More Silicon Valley Mind Control: Questioning Jewish Tribal History Banned from Facebook
Facebook bans Holocaust denial content
Published3 days agoRelated Topics
Facebook has explicitly banned Holocaust denial for the first time.
The social network said its new policy prohibits “any content that denies or distorts the Holocaust”.
Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg wrote that he had “struggled with the tension” between free speech and banning such posts, but that “this is the right balance”.
Two years ago, Mr Zuckerberg said that such posts should not automatically be taken down for “getting it wrong”.
“I’m Jewish and there’s a set of people who deny that the Holocaust happened,” he told Recode at the time.
“I find it deeply offensive. But at the end of the day, I don’t believe that our platform should take that down because I think there are things that different people get wrong. I don’t think that they’re intentionally getting it wrong.”
His remarks led to a large public backlash.
But on Monday, as Facebook changed its policies, he wrote that he had changed his mind.
“My own thinking has evolved as I’ve seen data showing an increase in anti-Semitic violence, as have our wider policies on hate speech,” he wrote in a public Facebook post.
“Drawing the right lines between what is and isn’t acceptable speech isn’t straightforward, but with the current state of the world, I believe this is the right balance.”
Earlier this year, Facebook banned hate speech involving harmful stereotypes, including anti-Semitic content. But Holocaust denial had not been banned.
Facebook’s vice-president of content policy, Monika Bickert, said the company had made the decision alongside “the well-documented rise in anti-Semitism globally and the alarming level of ignorance about the Holocaust, especially among young people”.
She said that later this year, searching for the Holocaust – or its denial – on Facebook would direct users to “credible” information.
But she also warned change would not happen overnight, and training its employees and automated systems would take time.
The World Jewish Congress – which had conferred with Facebook on anti-Semitism – welcomed the move.
“Denying the Holocaust, trivializing it, minimizing it, is a tool used to spread hatred and false conspiracies about Jews and other minorities,” the group said in a statement.
But it also noted that it had campaigned for the removal of Holocaust denial content from the platform “for several years”.
Jonathan Greenblatt, chief executive of the Anti-Defamation League, tweeted: “This has been years in the making.”
“Having personally engaged with Facebook on the issue, I can attest the ban on Holocaust Denial is a big deal… glad it finally happened.”
This was a bit of a “wait, they don’t do this already?” moment.
Perhaps that’s because Facebook has quite radically shifted its position on removing hate speech and fake news in recent months.
We’re still seeing loopholes from an old moderating regime being closed.
Critics, though, argue this isn’t happening fast enough.
The combined platforms of Facebook and Instagram – which is owned by Facebook – have an extraordinary reach of billions of users worldwide.
That influence has to be used responsibly, and Facebook acknowledges this.
The advertising boycott in July also helped cement the view internally that more had to be done to tackle hate speech.
Mark Zuckerberg’s instincts have always been to champion freedom of speech – the best way to fight bad speech is good speech he’s always said.
But this latest move appears to indicate Facebook now accepts it needs to be more proactive in combating hate speech.
Our pro-life reporting is being attacked. So is the truth. We can’t back down in the fight against abortion!View this email in your browser Photo Credit: Getty ImagesJames,The outrageous erasing of the White Coat Summit from the internet is only the latest in a long series of brazen acts of censorship against conservatives and all those who support legitimate free speech. You may agree or disagree with the efficacy of Hydroxychloroquine against the coronavirus, but everyone should agree on this point: No Big Tech company should have the power to erase from the internet the medical opinions of licensed practicing doctors simply because they do not like what they have to say about the coronavirus or their experience treating it. Americans and other free peoples do not need leftist computer programmers deciding what the best course of medical treatment is for them.SIGN PETITION Google/YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Apple, and their Big Tech friends want to control what you see, what you read, what you think, and ultimately, how you vote. Not only do they spend hundreds of millions of dollars on lobbying congress and buttering up big Washington DC think tanks, but now they brazenly and directly censor any content they don’t want you to see. This must stop, but it won’t unless we demand it as forcefully as legally possible. We believe that we have reached the point were Big Tech must be broken up if legitimate free speech is going to survive and continue to thrive on the internet. Please CLICK HERE to sign our petition to demand real consequences for Big Tech’s suppression of legitimate free speech. In an era where almost everything is polarized, there is an overwhelming support for breaking up the Big Tech monopolies. A recent Pew poll found that 75% of Americans believe that Big Tech companies have too much influence. It is time to bring serious accountability to Big Tech for their attempts to use their monopolies to kill free speech.It is time to break up Big Tech. PLEASE SIGN THIS URGENT PETITION, TODAY! Yours sincerely, John-Henry Westen and the entire LifeSite Team PS – Please SIGN this petition which calls for consequences for Big Tech’s suppression of free speech. PPS – Please CLICK HERE to find out more about the petition. Then, please SIGN and SHA |
Tonight Facebook censors deleted my post of America’s Frontline Doctors. The main form of communications for many people must now please and pander 2 Zuckerberg. If ma Bell did this to phone lines & communications would we be so accepting? #onpoli#cdnpoliQuote Tweet
Randy Hillier@randyhillier · 14hEarly this morning Facebook removed over 2500 likes and 2000 shares from my post regarding America’s Frontline Doctors. It appears the only freedom we truly have, is the freedom to comply with and obey the orthodoxy. #onpoli #cdnpoli twitter.com/randyhillier/s…
Facebook Censorship of Humour & Commentary
Videographer Diane King Reports
In | x |
They are likely elected to office and also running FB. Diane
(Tea Party 247) – Facebook is stepping up their censorship game. Natural News was just recently banned for content that was never even shared on the social media platform and that’s a scary occurrence. Just when we thought Big Tech was already the most powerful industry in America, they prove they have even more tricks up their fascist sleeves.
What Facebook is looking to create is an online echo chamber where everything posted, and not posted, is lockstep with the Leftist agenda including all things LGBT and baby murder.
As Ethan Huff points out in an article on Evil News,
Soon, if you don’t brand all of your profile photos with the over-layered, six-colored “rainbow” of LGBTQP during “Pride Month,” for instance, Facebook might decide to terminate your account for committing “hate silence.” This is the direction where things are headed as the Tech Cabal increasingly targets free-thinkers who break from the herd with suspension, shadow-banning, de-platforming, and even permanent bans for violating their ever-evolving litany of “community guidelines,” which always cater to Leftists at the expense of conservatives.
Now the truth is deemed hate speech and whether you post it or just quietly support it, you are likely to violate Facebook’s ever-changing “community guidelines,” as they are dictated by the ever-devolving Leftist agenda. Don’t be surprised when conservatives are soon being targeted for committing “hate silence” by simply holding different views than the loving, tolerant Left. Once Facebook sees that you are not publicly supporting Pride Month or the mutilation of pre-pubescent “trans” children you will be flagged and targeted.
This kind of censorship is absolutely insane and a direct violation of our First Amendment right. It’s also extremely hypocritical of the Left, which is something that has become par-for-the-course. Literally every idea, cause, or movement the Left pushes is somehow in contradiction with either itself or other Leftists ideas, causes, or movements.
Just look at how their victimhood hierarchy is constructed. At the very pinnacle of the caste system are “transgender” people, then women are somewhere towards the top but not higher than transgender. Now biological men are dominating women’s sports simply by claiming to actually be women. The “transgender” agenda is at odds with “women’s rights and equality.”
Now we have the Left yelling “fascist” at conservatives all while they blatantly censor us across all forms of social media. Now they want to control our thoughts and take away our right to have our own opinions and beliefs! This has to stop.
There is no way they don’t see how hypocritical they are which makes it even more disturbing. As Huff puts it, “This is what today’s Left expects, after all: absolute compliance with every single one of their “progressive” dictates, no matter how insane or ridiculous.”
If you even so much as dare believe that abortion is murder and that dismembering unborn babies is violent and evil and should be illegal, you are deemed a threat to the Left. If you post these obvious truths they will accuse you of “hate speech” and if you don’t post content that shows you support baby murder they will accuse you of “hate silence.” This is a scary direction we are going in.
Our only hope is that President Trump makes good on the allegations he has recently leveraged against Big Tech and follows through on his promises to end the censorship by Big Tech tyrants.
|
The social network has just made a specific decision to France. According to Secretary of State Cédric O, Facebook has agreed to provide the French justice IP addresses hate messages on its network.
The Secretary of State welcomes this ” huge news “, “They told us (that) they would transmit the IP addresses for the hate content online that would be requested by the justice,” he explains. , quoted by Le Figaro . A step forward specific to France, which according to Cédric O, will allow the “judicial process” to “proceed normally”.
Facebook used to deliver IP addresses to the courts only in cases involving terrorism and child pornography . Now, this cooperation extends to hate online.
|
My 65 years as a free writer—and censorship |
How would you like to be thinking this? “I’m a censor. I spend my waking hours keeping people from writing and speaking, by cutting off their access to the public. That’s my job and I love it. I love the feeling of shutting someone down…”
I picked up a pen and started writing when I was 16, in 1954. I knew I had struck gold. WRITING. Freedom. Words. Sentences. Poetry. Images. Ideas. This was my universe. It wasn’t run by some tin-pot teacher or official. I could keep making worlds. What could be better? I’ve never changed my mind about that. So when someone tells me—or a faceless company tells me—that I’m censored, I don’t take to it kindly. And I immediately know the faceless ones are rank filthy idiots. Or scrupulously clean robots. Either way, they’ve jumped species. Downward. Why did they censor me? Was it my articles about toxic vaccines, about freedom of the individual vs. the State, about the CIA, about Obama, about Trump, about political liars, about medical drugs killing millions of people? Lots to choose from. Who really cares what it was exactly? It was CENSORSHIP. I wasn’t laying out charts for building H-bombs. WordPress shut down my blog without notice or warning or explanation. However, I see no reason to stop writing. So I’m keeping on. I’ve got people employing “other means” to get the blog back up. Regardless, here I am. You’re reading this either because you’re already subscribed to my email list or someone forwarded to you this email.
If you’re in the latter category, then the best way to get my daily articles is go to my home page, NoMoreFakeNews.com and sign up for the email list in the upper left corner. You’ll get articles in your inbox. Thank you for your support. “If we don’t believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don’t believe in it at all.” —Noam Chomsky The real job of society is educating people so they are “immune” to other people’s views. What does that mean? This immunity, what is it? It’s the ability to understand and analyze someone else’s statements and make a decision about them. Agree or disagree. Accept one part, reject another part. The immunity consists of not impulsively buying what others are selling. In the 1950s, we had, in the US, a Red Scare. It consisted of Communist ideology. The question was, should students be allowed to read the Communist Manifesto, or should Marx’s pamphlet be burned and banned? The knee-jerk reaction was: ban the booklet. The minority opinion was: let students read it and understand it. But of course, the American school system hadn’t prepared pupils to analyze ANYTHING. So there was no solution. The whole Red Scare faded away eventually, as a “kinder, gentler” Leftist ideology spread through the country like ink on a blotter. EDUCATION SHOULD PREPARE PEOPLE TO MAKE UP THEIR OWN MINDS THROUGH THOUGHT AND LOGIC. Censorship is the coward’s way out. Censorship works when evil people accumulate enough power. This power CAN BE affected when a strong enough public reaction occurs. That’s called a clue. I’m a writer. I’m writing my way out of censorship. Help spread my articles, past and present, far and wide. At nomorefakenews.com, consider ordering my three Matrix collections. When I was 15, our history teacher was gone for two weeks. In strode a substitute. He basically said—“I’m going to use this time to teach you logic. I’m going to show you what a vague generalization is, so you can recognize it and not fall for it. I’m going to show you how to analyze what you read. This is WORK, class, but you’ll be glad you did it. So let’s dig in.” It took me about three minutes to see a light go on. It was very bright. I felt a surge of power. Nothing was ever the same after that. Years later, when I had my first encounter with censorship, I shrugged it off immediately. I was in possession of something much stronger. This article is dedicated to that substitute teacher. And to you, the reader. |
|
11:05 AM (11 hours ago)
|
![]() ![]() |
||
|