Trudeau Vengeance: Trucker Freedom Convoy Leader Harold Jonker Is Canada’s Latest Political Prisoner

Trudeau Vengeance: Trucker Freedom Convoy Leader Harold Jonker Is Canada’s Latest Political Prisoner

Have you heard of Harold Jonker? Can you please help? I can’t believe I haven’t but I’ll help!

He is a hard-working, patriotic Canadian who continues to be persecuted by the government almost 3 yrs after the 2022 Ottawa Freedom that he led as the Niagara contiguency.

As Niagara Captain for the 2022 Ottawa Freedom Convoy he led 12 of his own company’s trucks (co-owner of Jonker Trucking) along with countless others into Ottawa, and the truck he was driving was the first official Truck to enter Ottawa for the Convoy. He played a strong leadership role at the Convoy and was part of the unofficial leadership team there. Many say he was a big part of the critical “glue” that kept things together, and kept things peaceful (at least on the part of the protestors).

Of course, that means the government is targeting him, and he is fighting 4 criminal charges that carry potential jail time with them. He was also suspended as a local city councillor, and has $50,000 in court costs he needs to pay from fighting an unjust punishment by the unelected “Integrity Commissioner”.

To help Harold pay his legal bills, click below:

https://www.convergepay.com/hosted-payments/…

Etransfer – fundingthefight@proton.me

Password – Freedom

Memo – Harold

Message From Derek Sloan:

Harold’s trial will last 10 days and is scheduled for May 2025. He has four criminal charges total – Mischief, Intimidation, and 2 charges of Counselling an uncommitted indictable offence. The last 2 charges really had my head spinning.

What did he actually do to deserve these charges? Your guess is as good as mine.

If you untangle the legalese on the last tongue-twisting charge, it means – you are charged with telling someone to commit a crime that they do not actually commit. Huh?? In my latest interview with Harold coming out this week, we try to get to the bottom of what exactly these charges mean, and what awaits him at trial.

The Crown offered him 1 year house arrest if he agreed to plead guilty. Harold refused. Now they’re asking for a year in prison.

Putting a law-abiding, business owning Canadian in jail for one year because he attended a peaceful protest, coordinated with the Ottawa Police, is absolutely scandalous.

He also led the Convoy to remain peaceful when forces conspired against them to break their patience and try to create violence.

Please give Harold Jonker the help he needs by giving today:

Etransfer – fundingthefight@proton.me

Password – Freedom

Memo – Harold

Yes, these charges against Harold are reckless and unfair. They threaten to put an honest, hard-working father and husband in jail for one year. But this also threatens all of us. Harold’s charges stem from peaceful behaviour protesting the government’s actions. If pushing back against the government becomes a punishable crime, anyone of us could be next.

Stay tuned for our interview to come later this week, and thank you for your support!

God bless,

Derek Sloan

FYI: Share this e-mail on your social media! Click here

P.S. Know someone who would like to receive this email? They can sign up here: Subscribe Now

P.P.S. Having trouble donating? You can also donate here

You received this email because you subscribed to our list. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Derek Sloan, PO Box 1645, Belleville, ON, K8N 0A5, Canada

Transgendered Violence: Rep. Nancy Mace Attacked, Injured, by Pro-Transgender Man

Rep. Nancy Mace Attacked, Injured, by Pro-Transgender Man

Todd StarnesDecember 10, 2024

SHARE

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) was physically attacked Tuesday night on Capitol Hill by a suspect described as a pro-transgender man.

Mace, who has been leading a fight ban transgenders from using the bathrooms designated for ladies at the U.S. Capitol, confirmed that she was assaulted.

“I was physically accosted at the Capitol tonight by a pro-tr*ns man,” the Republican lawmaker wrote on X. “One new brace for my wrist and some ice for my arm and it’ll heal just fine. The Capitol police arrested the guy.”

}”>

U.S. Capitol Police confirmed that James McIntyre, 33, of Illinois had been charged with assaulting a government official.

“Just before 6:00 p.m., the Member of Congress’ office reported an incident in the Rayburn House Office Building. House Division officers, and agents with the Threat Assessment Section, tracked down the suspect,” police said in a statement.

Mace ended her X post with a warning to other predators lurking in the shadows: “Your tr*ns violence and threats on my life will only make me double down. FAFO.”

Authorities confirmed McIntyre had passed through standard security screening before entering the building.

“The Rayburn House Office Building was open to the public at the time of the incident. McIntyre went through security screening prior to entering the Congressional buildings,” police said.

Riley Gaines, a former NCAA swimmer who is leading a national effort to protect women from transgenders, condemned the attack on Mace.

“This is what we’re up against—literal violence for daring to say women are worthy of equal rights to privacy, safety, and opportunity,” Gaines wrote on X.

How the Strike At Canada Post Affects Druthers

  What’s going on? With the Canada Post strike dragging on, I would like to share a few things with you all regarding this situation and how it affects Druthers and Druthers supporters. First, I should point out, more than 90% of Druthers newspapers each month are sent on skids as freight on trains to our hubs across the country for free for local volunteers to collect bundles and distrubute freely as they see fit in their communities. For the large majority of papers, Canada Post has zero effect on Druthers. Where the Canada Post strike most affects Druthers is with our postal subscribers, yet even so, that has only impacted a portion of our subscribers. Who is affected? Subscriptions of 3 papers or 12 papers are the ones that are currently held up because they ship as lettermail (and Canada Post is the only organization ‘allowed’ to deliver lettermail in Canada). So those letters are not moving right now. In the meantime, everyone is invited to read the online PDF version for free at druthers.ca/newspapers Subscribers who receive 50 papers or above each month have all received their packages this month as we were able to send packages through another company. Sadly, only Canada Post is ‘allowed’ to deliver to post office boxes, therefore, all subscribers who have PO Boxes have all their lettermail and parcels held up.

How is this even allowed to happen? How is it ‘allowed’ for the union to call a strike and just hold everyones letters and packages hostage like this? It quite literally is a hostage / ransom type of situation. And since Canada Post is the only company ‘allowed’ to deliver lettermail in this country, how is it they are even ‘allowed’ to go on strike in the first place?? Something smells funny about all this. I could go on with further thoughts but they are all just theories and possible scenarios. We’ll see. Time will tell. Regardless, if this strike continues past Christmas, we will initiate plan B and our subscribers will receive both the December and January papers. I won’t elaborate on that yet as I wish to just keep focus on Canada Post getting back to it, sooner than later. But know, we have a plan B and very much appreciate your patience and understandiing. As for collector packs and other merchandise…

We are still able to ship the following items since they go out as parcels with other shipping companies. – 50 copies or more of Druthers newspapers
– 3 or more shirts in one order
– 3 or more collectors packs in one order
Note: You still have time get these in time for Chistmas if you get your goodies ordered this week. And of course, please also keep the donations going so we can keep the presses running and getting these eye-opening newspapers to our fellow Canadians. Much love to you all!! Shawn Jason

The Debanking of VDARE and Other Dissidents

Exactly as we surmised from internal evidence when we suspended VDARE, it turns the Biden Regime WAS behind debanking of political oppenents, which in our case meant denial of payment processors. “Government documents unsealed at the end of 2020 proved that the federal government used its regulatory authority over financial markets to attack political opponents.” — Peter Brimelow

How Democrats ‘debanked’ political opponents in shocking attack on American freedoms

By

E. J. Antoni

Published Dec. 6, 2024, 3:23 p.m. ET

U.S. President Joe Biden boards Air Force One as he departs for Luanda, Angola, from Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, U.S., December 1, 2024. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz
Debanking is a method of fiscal blacklisting. REUTERS

President Biden has overseen nearly four years of a two-tiered justice system, as his pardoning of Hunter Biden and the political persecutions of then-candidate Donald Trump make all too clear.

But there have been quieter attacks on justice, like “debanking” — and few people realize they could be the next victims because they are a “politically exposed person,” that is someone who disagrees with the liberal status quo.

Debanking is a kind of financial blackballing that has appeared within just the last 20 years.

It started under then-President Barack Obama as a war to punish those seen as political enemies, like firearm manufacturers. Government documents unsealed at the end of 2020 proved that the federal government used its regulatory authority over financial markets to attack political opponents.

Government regulators essentially make it impossible for certain people or businesses to make online transactions, or to have a bank account or a credit card.

Dr. Joseph Mercola, a critic of the COVID vaccine, found his business accounts shut down by JP Morgan Chase, a move his chief financial officer claimed was at the same time Mercola spoke out against the Food and Drug Administration.

Biden admin brought unprecedented climate change prosecution against man for ‘smuggling greenhouse gases’ by transporting refrigerants

In her new memoir, Melania Trump says her bank account was terminated after the riots of Jan. 6, 2021, and her son Barron was unable to open his own account. She called it “political discrimination.”

In the modern world, exclusion from electronic financial services is an economic death sentence.

Regulators will claim that they’re not technically forbidding a private bank from doing business with an individual, and that the bank is freely choosing not to have that person as a customer.

But the reality is very different — because of the undue influence and control in the hands of today’s bloated administrative state.

A bureaucrat can make someone’s life so difficult that the victim is forced to comply — the government strong-arming a private individual or institution into doing what the government itself cannot do by law.

It’s like when the Biden administration pressured social-media companies into deplatforming anyone who questioned political talking points about the COVID pandemic.

The debanking scourge under President Biden has hit the crypto world particularly hard. The Securities and Exchange Commission has unleashed a plague of investigations, some real and some merely threatened, to force innovators and investors out of that space.

Dozens of tech and crypto founders have been debanked under Biden, and their inventions smothered.

On Joe Rogan‘s podcast, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen blamed the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a group set up at the behest of Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) to go after crypto firms in particular.

“Basically every crypto founder, every crypto startup, either got debanked personally and forced out of the industry, or their company got debanked,” Andreessen said.

Andreessen added that others, like Kanye West, have been debanked, “For having the wrong politics. For saying unacceptable things. Under current banking regulations, after all the reforms of the last 20 years, there’s now a category called a politically exposed person, PEP. And if you are a PEP, you are required by financial regulators to kick them off, to kick them out of your bank.”

President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, has pointed out that many Democrats have been on an anti-crypto crusade as they attempt to wash off the stink of FTX and Sam Bankman Fried — the crypto scammer and fraud who gave massive campaign donations to Democratic politicians.

The problem goes far beyond crypto or the tech industry, however. And it’s bigger than just the Biden administration, which uses surrogates like the Southern Poverty Law Center to fallaciously label any conservative institution a “hate group.” Doing business with a group that engages in “hate” can get a financial institution dinged by regulators for increased “reputational risk.”

What do you think? Post a comment.

What does that have to do with a creditor’s ability to repay a loan or the solvency of a bank or the worth of an individual’s assets? Nothing. The radical left’s push to debank anyone with whom they disagree has nothing to do with sound financial principles — it’s all politics.

Anyone who appreciates freedom and the rule of law should be supremely grateful that the incoming president has put the bureaucrats on notice: Their days of covertly forcing political compliance are numbered.

E.J. Antoni, a public-finance economist, is the Richard F. Aster fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

s-d

PEEL COPS HARASS PORT CREDIT FREEDOM RALLY

PEEL COPS HARASS PORT CREDIT FREEDOM RALLY

A bit of a problem at the weekly freedom rally in Port Credit, Saturday, noon to 4:00, at the lighthouse on Lakeshore. Seven Peel Police cars drove up. A pushy Negro officer started berating the freedom fighters for attaching banner to trees (just temporarily). Mississauga is awash with gang mostly Black gun violence, home invasions and carjackings, but three dozen peaceful protesters demanded their attention. CAFE was happy to participate.

LES BORY & MOHAMMED MAJIDPOUR

LES BORY & MOHAMMED MAJIDPOUR

What’s the difference between Leslie Bory and Mohammed Majidpour? Les Bory is a political prisoner. A non-violent man with no criminal record, he has languished in prison. at the Maplehurst Detention Centre in Milton Ontario since February 14, 2023 — nearly two years. His “crime”? He has an online television podcast. On February 11, 2023, he made some strong statements against privileged groups in Canada, primarily Jews. For his non-violent speech, he and his wife were subject to arrest by a fully armed police shock squad. Despite numerous applications this non-violent political of words has repeatedly been denied bail.

And Mohammed Majidpour? “One of the more high-profile examples being Mohammed Majidpour, a man who already had at least 30 convictions when, in September 2022, he randomly attacked a 19-year-old woman in Downtown Vancouver with a pole, and then set fire to a car later that day. When eventually arrested for the attack, Majidpour spent only a weekend in detention before getting bail. He’d then proceed to be arrested several more times before the pole attack even had a chance to go to trial. In one instance, Majidpour was on bail less than three hours before he was arrested again for trying to steal $300 in leggings. As the Vancouver Police said in a statement, two officers who had arrested Majidpour the day before on a separate incident, simply followed him until he broke the law again. “At the time of his arrest, the suspect had been out of custody for two hours, 18 minutes,” read a subsequent police statement.:   (National Post, December 6, 2024)

This is Canada’s highly politicized “justice” system. If you do violent and evil things, the system can’t get you back on the streets fast enough. However, if you express non-violent thoughts, our leftist justice system will keep you in jail.

Small Victory: Liberals Split Bill C-63 in Two: The Draconian Sections Will Follow in A Later Piece of Legislation

[It’s a small victory and buys us time. Parliament is so clogged with backlog, two months of filibuster because the Liberals won’t turn over all the documents Parliament ordered in regards to the Green Technology Fund scandal, and, of course, the crisis Canada faces because President Trump may impose tariffs because of our lax border and thriving fentanyl industry, that virtually nothing is getting done as we hurtle to a federal election which can’t come soon enough. So, the Trudeau government in splitting the noxious “Online Harms” Act, Bill C-63 into two: The first bill will deal with ponderous new bodies to harass Internet Service Providers to restrict kiddie porn, revenge pron, etc., which are already restricted.. The projected cost of this new censorship apparatus is estimate to be $200-million and it may take many months to train staff. It is this bill which will have have priority.

The more police state provisions — life in prison for “hate motivated” crimes, life in prison for advocating genocide, prior restraint a judge can order if convinced a person May commit a “hate crime”, the return of Sec. 13 and the tyranny of the Canadian Human Rights Commission, where there can be anonymous complainants and astronomical fines — will be put into another Bill which has lesser priority.

The usual proponents of censorship aren’t happy. The Jewish lobby, primarily the old Canadian Jewish Congress, has been the prime instigator, beginning in the 1930s of anti-free speech laws. It’s successor is angry. “The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs expressed concern about what it said appeared to be the government backing away from the part of the bill meant to address rising acts of antisemitism. At a time of widespread antisemitism, we are very disappointed that the Liberal government is, in effect, dropping the parts of the bill which could have had an impact on the spread of Jew-hatred online,” said  Richard Marceau, vice-president of external affairs and general counsel. “It is time for the government to commit to fighting antisemitism concretely.” (National Post, December 5, 2024) “Anti-Semitism” is serious criticism of Jews or the State of Israel.

An the other side of the infernal quarrel in the Middle East also is unhappy. “”A spokeswoman for the National Council of Canadian Muslims says in a statement the organization “has been in favour of hate crime reform and balanced online harms legislation that respects civil liberties.” “We are committed to working with all parties to make sure that things move forward positively, but we are seeing more and more examples of how hate crime legislation and the Criminal Code in relation to hate isn’t being appropriately applied,” wrote Fatema Abdalla.” — Paul Fromm]

Trudeau Liberals blink on censorship bill — but the fight isn’t over!

The Liberals say they’re still committed to bringing in the worst parts of the ‘online harms bill’, but now they’ve split the legislation in two parts. It’s a win for freedom of speech and the over 75,000 Canadians who have signed our Stop The Censorship petition. But the fight isn’t over yet.

Ezra Levant

Ezra Levant   |   December 04, 2024   |   News Analysis

Breaking news: the Trudeau Liberals blinked on their censorship law, Bill C-63. They haven’t cancelled it. But they’ve decided to split it into two parts. They’re proceeding quickly on the first part, which includes things like banning revenge porn and sex trafficking.

(By the way, revenge porn was already banned by Stephen Harper 10 years ago, and child porn was banned decades ago — those were obviously added to the censorship bill as a distraction from their real purpose.)

But they say they’re going to split off the censorship provisions and go slower on those.

This is a win for freedom of speech — and the 75,267 Canadians who have signed our petition.

PETITION: Stop the Censorship!

76,108 signatures

Goal: 100,000 signatures

meta-img

Please sign this petition to demand that Justin Trudeau repeal all of his censorship legislation, including his latest “Online Harms Act.”

But as you can see in the video here, the Liberals still say they’re committed to bringing in those censorship provisions. So this could be a trick, to make us lower our guard.

I have personally heard C-63 referred to by several journalists as the “kill Rebel” bill. Of course it is: because we’re one of the few news outlets that doesn’t take money from Trudeau, so we’re one of the few news outlets that can’t be controlled by Trudeau.

If Trudeau can’t use the carrot with us, he’ll use the stick: censorship.

Even though he’s hated by his own party, Trudeau has the votes to smash this through Parliament. He supports this censorship, and he has a deep, personal hatred for Rebel News. You’ve seen his bodyguards beat up our reporter David Menzies; and Chrystia Freeland’s bodyguards beat up David, too. If they’ll commit an assault against our reporters — breaking the law — they’d obviously think nothing of changing the law to get us, either.

And both Jagmeet Singh’s NDP and the separatist Bloc Québécois have said they support the censorship provisions, too. That’s enough to ram this through.

I’m glad Trudeau blinked today. But it’s nothing more than a blink. If we’re to take the Liberals at their word, they still intend to pass this law — just under a different name.

C-63 will create three new different censorship agencies in Canada. It would give the Canadian Human Rights Commission the power to investigate anyone in Canada for anything they post online — or have ever posted online in the past. It would set up $20,000 bounties for anyone who makes a complaint that’s successful; it would give the courts the power to make hate speech “restraining orders”, to stop people from saying things even before they do, even putting them under house arrest.

It’s the most draconian censorship bill ever seen in Canada.

Our motto is “telling the other side of the story”. But you can’t do that if the government tells you that you can’t even say something. We constantly challenge government censorship, and we’ve had to spend more than $500,000 this year alone on free speech lawyers.

The fact that Trudeau says he’s going to split the bill in two doesn’t mean he’s done with it. Until this bill is dead, it’s still alive. Don’t let your guard down. We won’t.

We have sued Trudeau to stop his censorship more than any other news organization. We’ve hired free speech lawyers to fight against censorship in the B.C. Supreme Court, Alberta Court of King’s Bench, the Federal Court, the Federal Court of Appeal and the Ontario Superior Court. We are even seeking leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada itself.

Elmo Mayor Will Not Pay Fine For Not Declaring Gay Pride Month & Will Not Attend Maoist Indoctrination Sessions

Breadcrumb Trail Link

  1. Toronto & GTA

WARMINGTON: Mayor says he refuses to be bullied or pay fine for not flying Pride flag

Joe Warmington

(Toronto Sun, Dec 02, 2024)  •  Last updated 3 hours ago  •  8 minute read

252 Comments

A Northern Ontario mayor fined for voting against flying a Pride flag says he will not be bullied into paying the $5,000 penalty.
In this file photo taken on Nov. 20, 2022, a community member’s silhouette is seen through a Pride flag while paying their respects to the victims of the mass shooting at Club Q, an LGBTQ nightclub, in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Photo by JASON CONNOLLY /AFP via Getty Images

Article content

A Northern Ontario mayor who was fined for voting against flying a Pride flag at his town hall says he will not be bullied into paying the $5,000 penalty.

Nor will Mayor Harold McQuaker be taking LGBTQ training as he has been ordered to by the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO)

And, McQuaker, insisted he won’t cave to demands that he must host a Drag Time story hour in the local library, either.

Canada may be a free country in some places. But not in Emo Township — 380 kilometres west of Thunder Bay on the Canada-U.S. border. In this township, defying LGBTQ demands can not only land you a stiff fine, but also an order to attend a re-education camp, too.

This story which has had coverage in the United States and Europe is happening in Premier Doug Ford’s Ontario where they can’t seem to keep repeat gunman from being let out on bail but they can throw the book at a soon-to-be 77-year-old rural mayor of a tiny village.

“I utterly refuse to pay the $5,000 because that’s extortion,” McQuaker told The Toronto Sun

t

Art

Whether Emo, located across from Minnesota, pays its $10,000 fine from the HRTO will be decided Tuesday.

“I have a lot of respect for our four councillors,” said the mayor. “We have a special meeting of council, and they will decide that and what to do next. Either pay the fine or appeal it?”

Their choices are simple: Either buckle and bend to the pressure being brought on them by the OHRC and a local Pride group or tell them to go pound salt.

“The Township shall pay to Borderland Pride the sum of $10,000 as compensation for infringement of the Code,” said HRTO Commissioner Karen Dawson in her Nov. 20 ruling. “Mayor McQuaker shall pay to Borderland Pride the sum of $5,000 as compensation for infringement of the Code.”

Emo Township in Nothern Ontrario has been ordered to a $10,000 pay a fine by the Ontario Human Rights Commission for not voting to fly a Pride flag -- photo courtesy of Borderland Pride
Emo Township in Northern Ontario has been ordered to a $10,000 pay a fine by the Ontario Human Rights Commission for not voting to fly a Pride flag — photo courtesy of Borderland Pride

She added “Mayor McQuaker and the Township’s current CAO shall complete the OHRC eLearning Module, titled Human Rights 101, and provide proof of completion of same to Borderland Pride within 30 days of the date of this decision.”

It sounds like a prison sentence — only tougher than most criminals ever receive. It also shows when the motion was brought to council in 2020 to fly a Pride flag for Pride month, it was not a request but a demand, punishable by fine should council not play ball.

Police Remove Citizen From Council Meeting For Holding American Flag

Police Remove Citizen From Council Meeting For Holding American Flag

SMG News WireDecember 2, 2024

[Perhaps, Nishith Patel, Edison Township Council President just doesn’t get the importance of the American flag and the Constitution. The fruits of diversity!]

The Edison Township Council in New Jersey has banned citizens from having American flags, copies of the U.S. Constitution or “other props” at meetings.

A citizen who objected to the new rules was told by council president Nishith Patel that he was in violation ordered police to remove the man from the council chamber.

“To consider the American flag and the Constitution a prop when someone raises it is an insult to what the flag is, what the flag stands for and what this country is,” resident Maryann Hennessey told MyCentralJersey.com. “For you to consider the use of the American flag a prop is disgusting.”

READ: Twilight’s Last Gleaming: Can America Be Saved? President Trump Says It’s a “Must Read” book.

Patel told the Edison Reporter that “any props will be considered not conducive to good order and as the President I am making that call.”

“The American flag is a symbol of our nation and our values,” resident Joel Bassoff told the Edison Reporter. “To suggest that displaying it is disruptive is an insult to everything it stands for.”

Patel then told Bassoff he was in violation of the council’s rules by holding the American flag.

“It’s my constitutional right to do this,” Bassoff said. “If you get sued, you will lose. My suggestion to you is that you get a second opinion from competent counsel because you are wrong.”

At that point police were summoned and Bassoff was removed from the room.

Residents can be heard clapping as Bassoff continued. “You are interfering with the decorum of this meeting by interfering with the right to speech of a member of the public. And it should stop now,” he said.

Edison Republican Chairwoman Sylvia Engle said that banning the flag from council meetings “goes beyond normal political discourse between parties and will be destructive to our diverse community. This goes beyond common sense, quite frankly it’s absurd.”

Men and women sacrificed their lives for that flag and it’s disgraceful to imagine elected officials would dare to ban Old Glory. Watch the entire encounter below.

Related

Speaker Johnson Chickens Out on Transgender Bathroom Fight

Speaker Johnson Chickens Out on Transgender Bathroom Fight

By Todd Starnes

BULLETIN: Biden Pardons His Son Hunter

BULLETIN: Biden Pardons His Son Hunter

By Todd Starnes

FBI Raided Barron Trump’s Bedroom, But Not Hunter’s

FBI Raided Barron Trump’s Bedroom, But Not Hunter’s

By Todd Starnes

Democrats Still Don’t Get It

Democrats Still Don’t Get It

By The Political Insider

Fewer Have Election Cheating Concerns for 2024

Fewer Have Election Cheating Concerns for 2024

By RasmussenReports.com New Articles

Democrats in Denial After Defeat?

Democrats in Denial After Defeat?

By RasmussenReports.com New Articles

Related

Trump: Release the Hostages or ‘There Will be ALL HELL TO PAY’

Trump: Release the Hostages or ‘There Will be ALL HELL TO PAY’

By Todd Starnes

Speaker Johnson Chickens Out on Transgender Bathroom Fight

Speaker Johnson Chickens Out on Transgender Bathroom Fight

By Todd Starnes

Professor: Minority Trump Voters are ‘Dead to Me’

Professor: Minority Trump Voters are ‘Dead to Me’

By Todd Starnes

FBI Raided Barron Trump’s Bedroom, But Not Hunter’s

FBI Raided Barron Trump’s Bedroom, But Not Hunter’s

By Todd Starnes

Most Workers Expect Higher Pay Next Year

Most Workers Expect Higher Pay Next Year

By RasmussenReports.com New Articles

The ‘Winter of Hypocrisy’ Is Coming Soon

The ‘Winter of Hypocrisy’ Is Coming Soon

By The Political Insider