14 Year Old WN YOU TUBE SENSATION “SOPH” THE LATEST VICTIM OF SILICON VALLEY CENSORSHIP
Silenced by Google? Worker claims he was put on leave for speaking out
Silenced by Google?
Worker claims he was put on leave for speaking out
[MORE IDEOLOGICAL TYRANNY BY THE LEFTISTS IN SILICON VALLEY.]
A Google employee was summarily put on administrative leave for speaking out against the tech giant’s leftwing ideologues allegedly having their paws all over the company’s algorithms in order to slice out conservative information and people they don’t like.
Freshly suspended senior Google engineer Greg Coppola spoke out publicly in an interview with conservative investigative news outlet Project Veritas.
“Are we going to continue to think for ourselves or are we just going to let the biggest tech companies decide who wins every election from now on?” he said in the bombshell interview.
“I look at search and I look at Google News and I see what it’s doing and I see Google executives go to Congress and say that it’s not manipulated.
“It’s not political. And I’m just so sure that’s not true.”
This is not the first time a Google employee has charged them with having a left-wing bias.
Last year, James Damore was fired for an internal document he authored trying to explain why there were less women in tech after the company was looking for feedback.
He then started legal proceedings against the company claiming it has “left biases” and is “alienating conservatives” by using “discriminatory practices.”
Shortly after Coppola came forward at the end of July, another Google employee fired in 2018 told Wall Street Journal he was let go for what he claims was advocating for conservative employees he says were bullied.
Google told The Hill he was fired for “misusing company equipment.”
Other critics have found biases in its search engine through their research.
Last year, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg told Congress Silicon Valley is “an extremely left-leaning place.”
In mid-july, U.S. President Trump held a social media summit in which he accused the tech giants of censoring conservatives.
In Canada, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called for more censorship of “hate speech” and “misinformation” through the introduction of a digital charter.
The Liberal government has close ties to top Canadian execs at the big tech companies, including Google.
As the 2019 federal election kicks off in mere weeks, the role big tech plays in the flow of information to everyday Canadians looms large.
Twitter Censors Sen. Mitch McConnell’s Report of Antifa Mob Attack on his Louisville Home

, also shared the video, presumably to show the hatred and violence from the Democrats Twitter also suspended their account for sharing the video Again: Twitter suspended McConnell’s campaign for showing the hatred directed at him

, also shared the video, presumably to show the hatred and violence from the Democrats Twitter also suspended their account for sharing the video Again: Twitter suspended McConnell’s campaign for showing the hatred directed at him
Connecting the Dots: Diane King, Videographer, Speaks of Free Speech Issues in the U.S. At CAFE Meeting, Toronto, 2017
SILICON VALLEY CENSORS DROP 8CHAN & INTERFERE WITH PUBLIC’S RIGHT TO READ ALLEGED SHOOTERS’ MANIFESTOS
SILICON VALLEY CENSORS DROP 8CHAN & INTERFERE WITH PUBLIC’S RIGHT TO READ ALLEGED SHOOTERS’ MANIFESTOS
Security provider drops imageboard 8chan used to distribute El Paso & Christchurch manifestos
In a blog post on Sunday, Cloudflare, which is based in San-Francisco, said it would discontinue its services to 8chan, an imageboard that has come under intense scrutiny for hosting several “manifestos” penned by mass shooters.
The company said it appears that the El Paso attacker posted his four-page “screed” to the site “immediately before beginning his terrifying attack on the El Paso Walmart killing 20 people.”
While 8chan’s role in the El Paso massacre was the last straw, Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince said it was a chain of events that forced the company to boot 8chan, one of which is the role the New Zealand mosque attack played in triggering the recent rampage.
\ “The El Paso shooter specifically referenced the Christchurch incident and appears to have been inspired by the largely unmoderated discussions on 8chan which glorified the previous massacre,” he wrote.
Prince argued that it does not matter whether or not 8chan violated any laws by allowing radical ideas to thrive on its platform; it was enough that they “have created an environment that revels in violating its spirit.”
“The rationale is simple: they have proven themselves to be lawless and that lawlessness has caused multiple tragic deaths.”
It was still a hard decision for the company to make as it seeks to treat all of its 19 million customers without bias, but, according to Prince, 8chan crossed the line by “directly” inspiring the tragedy.
READ MORE: American gun laws: Why the issues are not as clear-cut as they first apr
Prince said that Cloudfare seeks to shield itself from public outrage, adding that the move will not solve the bigger problem of sites propagating violence. The company’s decision to dump the white nationalist site Daily Stormer two years ago did not lead to its demise, but on the contrary, only fired up its base, he noted.
“I have little doubt we’ll see the same happen with 8chan. While removing 8chan from our network takes heat off of us, it does nothing to address why hateful sites fester online. It does nothing to address why mass shootings occur.”
He argued that it’s ultimately not up to a private company to decide “what content is good and bad” and how it should be handled, and called on the government to step up its role in internet regulation.
Journalist Christie Blatchford Wins the George Jonas Freedom Award for 2019
Journalist Christie Blatchford Wins the George Jonas Freedom Award for
TORONTO. June 14, 2019. Paul Fromm, the Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression, hails her as “the best courtroom reporter in Canada.” Some months back, she wrote a brilliant piece eviscerating the Kinsellas, Warren and Lisa, who have been tormenters of the satirical tabloid YOUR WARD NEWS, and were in the process of losing an “uttering threats” case against editor Dr. James Sears.
Tonight, Christie Blatchford became the second recipient of the George Jonas Freedom Award at a dinner in midtown Toronto sponsored by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms.
Centre Director John Carpay warned: “Political correctness in Canada has gone too far. Freedoms can be enshrined in a constitution but they must be enshrined in our hearts. Freedom is under serious attack in Canada today.” And, he concluded, “the biggest danger is not to realize we are in a war to destroy society from within.”
Introducing winner Christie Blatchford was Marie Henein who had just beaten the federal government to a standstill in the case of Vice Admiral Mark Norman.The Crown had been shamed into withdrawing the charges after putting the admiral through years of legal and financial hell.
“Christie is unmanageable,” Henein praised. “In four decades in our courts, sometimes at high personal cost, she has provided a critical, informed and reasoned view of our justice system. Christie, you are a barometer of what many of us should be thinking about in our legal work.”
Accepting the award, Miss Blatchford, who now writes for the National Post, mentioned pro-life campaigner “Linda Gibbons who has done a total of 11 years in jail for carrying s small sign opposing abortion” outside Toronto abortion clinics.
And, she added, “I’m concerned about difficulties in getting bail. Also, the “#me too” movement is a genuine threat.” Human rights hearings, she warned, “are unbearably unfair.” On a sombre note, she concluded her acceptance asking, “which of our federal leaders will defend free speech? None of the above.”
What Sort of Man Seeks to Have Another Fired, His livelihood Imperilled & He and His Family reduced to Poverty?
What Sort of Man Seeks to Have Another Fired, His livelihood Imperilled & He and His Family reduced to Poverty?
Indeed, what sort of man seeks to have another fired, his livelihood imperilled and he and his family reduced to poverty? And all because of the victim’s political beliefs at one time expressed on his own time and on his own time. What sort of driven man would do such a thing? Why, a person who describes himself as an Ottawa-based “human rights lawyer”. That would be federal civil servant Richard Warman. Warman seems to find immense time to try to ruin people with whom he disagrees politically.
In the glory days of Sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act (Internet censorship), Warman filed nearly 30 complaints. He boasts, in his affidavit seeking a peace bond against Kevin Goudreau, who has never contacted him”,” I have successfully brought 16 human rights complaints against online hate … resulting in permanent cease and desist orders.” Also, many of the victims were fined and two — Terry Tremaine and Thomas Winnicki — ended up spending time in prison because of Mr. Warman’s actions. More recently in attacking anti-Cultural Marxist satirical publication YOUR WARD NEWS, Warman, who lives in Ottawa, contacted Child Protective Services in Toronto, according to testimony at a recent trial, to try to get editor Dr. Sears’ son taken away. [An investigation found that Dr. Sears and his wife were loving parents.]
So, while snowflake Richard Warman whines about being so afraid of his political enemies, he relentlessly seeks to have them destroyed. In a July 16 letter he wrote on behalf of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network to Hamilton City Council, Warman who works for the federal government (when does he find time to do all this mischief?) seeks to have Mr. Lemire fired for his political views. Mr. Lemire was the longtime webmaster of the Freedomsite and was the subject of a Warman Sec. 13 complaint which Mr. Lemire partially won.
The letter filled with the false “neo-Nazi” smear, reads as follows: “I am a human rights lawyer in Ottawa and brought the successful human rights complaint against Marc Lemire for online hate (http://canlii.ca/t/1q60s). I have commented in numerous media stories about the recent exposure by Mack Lamoureux of VICE Canada that Marc Lemire is an employee of the City of Hamilton. I note that since the VICE article, various media reports have indicated that Marc Lemire denies any ongoing role in the neo-Nazi[sic] movement, minimizes any prior role despite Federal Court findings to the contrary, and claims that this was all many years in the past and that he is now reformed.
I do not believe this to be true. Marc Lemire openly acknowledges that he is responsible for the website http://www.freedomsite.org/. It took me less than 5-minutes to come up with multiple examples of Holocaust denial material from Marc Lemire’s Freedomsite website that remain available as of right now. Marc Lemire continues to publish to the world columns by Holocaust denier Philip Belgrave and others and at the bottom of the columns readers are invited to submit material to the webmaster (Lemire) for publication. The first article is titled “What is Anti-Semitism?” and states that Jews were not exterminated nor were they the principal sufferers in WWII, links to Ernst Zundel’s
Holocaust denial website calling it a “Detoxification Programme to Cure the Politically Correct of the Hollywood version of the Holocaust”, and links to 3 other Holocaust denial websites – URL link below and pdf version attached: ….
I am confident that if I continued my search, I would find further such hate propaganda. Based on the fact that Holocaust denial material remains available on Marc Lemire’s website, I submit to you that he is not fit to be an employee of the City of Hamilton.”
It might be noted that, even in Canada, questioning the so-called holocaust is not a crime, and, far from being “hate”, is, in fact pursuit of the truth.
Your Ward News hate case put over to Aug. 22; judge delays sentencing
Your Ward News hate case put over to Aug. 22; judge delays sentencing
TORONTO — A Toronto editor found guilty in January of promoting hatred against women and Jews was given more time on Thursday to say why he believes his lawyer threw the case.
In addition, Ontario court Judge Richard Blouin gave James Sears, who is looking to reopen his trial, two weeks to come up with a list of proposed witnesses and a summary of what evidence they might offer.
“I’ve never done or seen one of these applications,” Blouin said of the bid to reopen the trial. “It’s an unusual procedure. One we’re all working our way through.”
Blouin also put off sentencing for LeRoy St. Germaine, 77, publisher of Your Ward News, who was found guilty along with Sears.
The judge has been pressing St. Germaine, who has Metis background, to agree to a sentencing circle — a form of mediation in which a wrongdoer engages with their victims, in this case women and members of the Jewish community.
St. Germaine’s lawyer suggested his client was open to the concept — but not if he had to go into the mediation with apologies up front.
“The whole terms of reference might be a sticking point,” Blouin acknowledged. “(But) skilled facilitators have a way of getting to things over time.”
Blouin was insistent that a facilitated discussion of strongly opposed views in a “controlled, thoughtful arena” would be a good thing. He gave until Aug. 22 to come up with a plan or, he said, he would simply continue with sentencing St. Germaine.
For his part, Sears, 55, failed to produce a sworn affidavit Thursday as the judge had asked on why he felt his trial lawyer, Dean Embry, had deliberately blown the case.
Sears fired Embry, who denies any wrongdoing, after sentencing submissions in April. The editor claims he wanted to call defence witnesses but the lawyer refused.
“Mr. Sears hasn’t provided an affidavit on ineffective assistance of counsel,” Blouin said. “That needs to be done immediately.”
Blouin gave Sears until Aug. 8 to provide the sworn statement. The affidavit, as well as one from Embry, would be crucial in deciding whether to reopen the trial, the judge said.
“I would think, given the allegations against him, that Mr. Embry would want to respond,” Blouin said.
“There is no evidence whatsoever on the record to support the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel,” prosecutor Robin Flumerfelt said.
“I’m absorbing all this,” Sears said. “I’m not a lawyer.”
Sears, who also failed to provide a list of proposed witnesses, complained about finding experts, saying it’s hard to get in touch with academics during August. Sears said he expected to come up with an expert in satire and English.
The judge, who is retiring at the end of the month, was unmoved, saying the proceedings have dragged on long enough. He gave Sears until Aug. 15 to say who he would call to testify, their qualifications, and how their evidence would affect the case.
Sears and St. Germaine were responsible for Your Ward News, a free publication court heard was distributed to more than 300,000 homes and businesses in the Toronto area and available online. The publication consistently portrayed women and Jews in beyond ugly terms.
The Crown wants a total one-year jail term for Sears and six months for St. Germaine.
The case returns to court Aug. 22.
Jim and Diane discuss latest holocaust happenings this time the Florida principal and his holocaust issues, July 24, 2019
|
Jim and Diane discuss latest holocaust happenings this time the Florida principal and his holocaust issues, July 24, 2019
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulsi Gabbard sues Google for suspending her ads after first Dem debate
Tulsi Gabbard sues Google for suspending her ads after first Dem debate
July 26, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) – While most of the voices accusing tech giants of political discrimination are conservative, some left-of-center figures have been caught up in the controversy as well, including 2020 Democrat presidential hopeful Tulsi Gabbard.
Gabbard, a congresswoman from Hawaii, announced Thursday that she’s suing Google for suspending her campaign’s Google Ads account for several hours after the first Democrat primary debate.
The New York Times reported that following the debate, Gabbard was “briefly” the most-searched presidential candidate on Google, and the campaign wanted to seize that momentum with some ad buys, but found their account suspended.
“For hours, Tulsi’s campaign advertising account remained offline while Americans everywhere were searching for information about her,” Gabbard’s campaign charged. “During this time, Google obfuscated and dissembled with a series of inconsistent and incoherent reasons for its actions. In the end, Google never explained to us why Tulsi’s account was suspended.”
The campaign gave the Times emails indicating that Google initially suspended them for “problems with billing information or violations of our advertising policies,” then sent a notice several hours later reinstating the account and claiming the temporary suspension was meant to verify billing information and compliance with Google’s policies.
Google spokesman Jose Castaneda told the Times that the company’s automated systems, which are designed to catch “unusual” activity such as large spending changes, “triggered a suspension,” but “the account was reinstated shortly thereafter.”
“Google’s discriminatory actions against my campaign are reflective of how dangerous their complete dominance over internet search is, and how the increasing dominance of big tech companies over our public discourse threatens our core American values,” Gabbard declared in a statement. “This is a threat to free speech, fair elections and to our democracy, and I intend to fight back on behalf of all Americans.”
The lawsuit seeks an injunction against Google engaging in further election interference and a minimum of $50 million in damages. It also alleges that her campaign emails found their way into Gmail spam folders at “a disproportionately high rate” compared with those from other Democrat primary campaigns.
Gabbard has drawn some interest for ostensibly being more moderate than the rest of the Democrat field. As recently as 2004, she opposed same-sex “marriage,” but is now a doctrinaire liberal on abortion, LGBT issues, and even decriminalizing prostitution.
Since the 2016 election of President Donald Trump, Google has been under fire for allegedly intensifying efforts to slant their platforms and services in favor of Trump’s opponents and other left-wing causes in a variety of ways, including blacklists, biased algorithms, and more. Concerns have also been raised that figures within Google and other tech companies have been “subverted” by foreign governments.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman Ajit Pai told Congress last month that he considers “unregulated Silicon Valley tech giants” today’s “greatest threat to a free and open internet.” Earlier this month, Trump announced that he was “directing my administration to explore all regulatory and legislative solutions to tech censorship.” Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Missouri, has proposed legislation that would require social media platforms to certify their political neutrality with the FCC if they want to keep their congressionally granted immunity from legal liability for what they allow users to post.







