Author Archives: admin
Iconoclast Roy Albrecht Defends Paul Fromm & Free Speech
Iconoclast Roy Albrecht Defends Paul Fromm & Free Speech
An Open Letter to Hamilton City Council, the Hamilton Spectator and the Citizens of Hamilton:
1) The Hamilton Spectator is the Worm Hole Central Plexus of disinformation in the Region of Hamilton Wentworth that is overwhelmingly controlled by Zionist Jews.
2) According to many peer reviewed sources…,
not the least of which is Prof. Emeritus, Dr. Kevin MacDonald’s authoritative best seller, The Culture of Critique…,
Zionist Jews have been documented as instrumental in the World Wide push to eliminate Indigenous European Rights in their own nations since the early 1960’s.
3) Paul Fromm, has been Canada’s leading voice for the indigenous White European peoples of Canada for nearly HALF A CENTURY!
4) Hamilton City Council is under EVERY OBLIGATION to allow Mr. Fromm to express views that Jewish Lobby Groups are keen to censor because they fear that Mr. Fromm’s Truth Telling may derail their hidden agenda of White Christian Hatred and their goal to replace Canada’s founding settlers of European Heritage with low skilled imports from Third World Nations.
5) The fact that the Spectator frames their argument, against allowing Mr. Fromm a voice due to “…White Supremacy…” is proof positive of the underhanded and insidious tactics that Jewish Lobby Groups will go to in order to increase and maintain their present overwhelming control of Canada’s economic climate.
6) I have personally known Paul for over twenty years. He is professional, honest, unbiased, and on the side of the little guy time and time again. Paul has even supported the rights of Natives and Metis to exercise their right to speak freely on whatever topic they choose, even if he personally disagrees.
Paul trusts that the people of Canada are smart enough to decide for themselves whom they will or will not believe.
7) ON NO ACCOUNT SHOULD Mr. FROMM BE DENIED HIS RIGHT TO EXPRESS VIEWS THAT WILL PROTECT THE PEOPLES’ OF CANADA’S LONG TERM INTERESTS BASED ON THE LIES OF THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR !!
Truly,
RCMP SWAT Team Arrests Canadian Man For Visiting Website Jewish Watchdog Doesn’t Approve Of
RCMP SWAT Team Arrests Canadian Man For Visiting Website Jewish Watchdog Doesn’t Approve Of

The RCMP raided the rural Manitoba house of a military reservist who is suspected of frequenting a survivalist website that advocated preparedness for a possible upcoming civil disturbance:
No charges have been laid against Master Cpl. Patrik Mathews, a member of the Winnipeg-based 38 Canadian Brigade Group, but both RCMP and the military are investigating his alleged ties to The Base, an organization that promotes hate.
Mounties descended on Mathews’s home in the rural town of Beausejour, about 50 kilometres east of Winnipeg, late Monday, ordering him out of his house.
In a video of the raid, posted to Facebook a short time later, a voice can be heard saying: “Patrik Mathews, we have a search warrant for this residence. You can exit the back door with your hands in the air.”
RCMP said later they searched a house in Beausejour and seized a number of firearms, but no one is in custody at this time…
Sarah Lockhart, who lives across the street, said dozens of police officers and a tactical team were at the home across from hers around 10:30 p.m. CT.
“He came out quietly,” she said. “It took them about five minutes to get him out…”
The Department of National Defence is investigating claims that Mathews, an eight-year member of the 38 Canadian Brigade Group, is involved in a neo-Nazi group.
If the allegations are confirmed, Mathews could be forced to undergo counseling or lose his job, among other possible consequences, said brigade commander Col. Gwen Bourque.
“It’s completely unacceptable for [Canadian Armed Forces] members to participate in any activity or have any membership in a group or organization that the members know or should have ought to have known that is connected to criminal activities,” Bourque said Tuesday in a conference call with reporters.
“Every soldier must respect the dignity of all persons, at all times.”
Details of Mathews’ alleged activities were originally revealed by the Winnipeg Free Press, whose reporter went undercover posing as a white nationalist wishing to join the group. According to the report, Mathews has training with explosives.
Bourque acknowledged Mathews, as a combat engineer, has “very rudimentary” explosives training that involves basic understanding of demolition.
Bourque also stressed that Mathews would only have access to explosives as part of sanctioned military exercises. She described his master corporal rank as a “junior” position within the Army Reserves but said he would’ve received leadership training and been in charge of a section of reserve soldiers…
(((Bernie Farber))), chair of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network, described The Base as an extreme right-wing North American hate organization.
It’s focused on growing its membership through recruitment and training for violence, he said.
“They consider the alt-right to be not extreme enough,” he said. “They are almost like a neo-Nazi death cult.”
It isn’t clear how many people belong to the group in Canada, but Farber said the size of the group isn’t necessarily the most important detail.
“It only really takes one or two very committed, ultra-violent individuals to create all kinds of havoc,” said Farber.
One of The Base’s stated goals is for members to get into the military in order to receive training and then spread that to others in their group, according to Evan Balgord, executive director of the Canadian Anti-Hate Network.
He said The Base idolizes mass killers and pledges to carry out terrorist attacks to accelerate what they see as a coming race war…
Some experts estimate the membership in The Base is around 50 to 100 members…
The Military Police Criminal Intelligence Section tracked incidents of racism and white supremacy within the CAF from 2013 to 2018. Less than one per cent of the military population was engaged in racist or hate-motivated activities, according to the military police.
Punishment for this type of behaviour ranges from counseling to career consequences, including dismissal and legal repercussions. The military said seven administrative reviews have been conducted related to extremism and racism, which has led to two individuals being released from the Forces.
So Matthews was arrested but committed no crime except perhaps a “thought crime” which apparently is treated far more seriously than an actual crime with an actual victim. When police go to arrest a common rape suspect, do they surround his house with a SWAT team comprised of dozens of tactical warfare experts? Need we ask?
Keep in mind that everything being alleged about this “hate group” comes to us from a self-appointed jewish expert on “hate”. Nowhere is there any attempt to be fair-minded about this group and see it in the most reasonable way. This group is obviously not preparing to instigate violence; rather, it is preparing to defend themselves and their families when the anti-White violence perpetuated by the Bolsheviks who occupy the Comintern in Ottawa reaches critical mass, and to not prepare for it is the height of foolishness.
Those like Matthews who oppose this destruction of Canada and the replacement of those who built it are dangerous “enemies of the people” who will be diagnosed as mentally ill and given remedial “counseling” or “re-education” per the model of the “former” Soviet Gulag system.

More Support For Free Speech & Common Sense in Hamilton
SUPPORT POURS IN FROM ACROSS ONTARIO FOR PAUL FROMM’S APPEARANCE AT HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL
SUPPORT POURS IN FROM ACROSS ONTARIO FOR PAUL FROMM’S APPEARANCE AT HAMILTON CITY COUNCIL
Letter to the Editor
Hamilton Spectator
To the Editor:
Your article advocating that the Canadian Association for Free Expression be denied the opportunity to submit a brief to Hamilton council is ironic, to say the least. In today’s editorial you stated: “Governments at all levels and of all stripes need to be very careful that they don’t abuse their positions of trust, including their commitment to be open, responsive and accessible to citizens. That’s central to their commitment to the democratic process and civic engagement”. If that isn’t doublespeak I don’t know what is. Let everyone’s opinion hit the table. Even Paul Fromm’s. If council or the public don’t agree with an opinion then argue it or ignore it. On the other hand, perhaps everyone’s point of view is essential to a robust dialogue on any issue at hand. What skin does the Spectator have in the game to deny a Canadian’s right to express themselves? Is it to control public opinion? Sounds like it.
Helen Kmera
Belleville ON
Former Hamilton Mayoralty Candidate Edward Graydon Comes to Paul Fromm’s Defence
Former Hamilton Mayoralty Candidate Edward Graydon Comes to Paul Fromm’s Defence
I think because of Fake News his reputation and what it is he really stands for is being taken out of context and because Google is really the only way people find out about other people he has been publicly outcasted for holding certain views but in reality I do not have that opinion of him I have never heard him utter hateful opinions and I talk to him regularly. Council believed what was being propagated against him and decided to believe much of the Fake News and decided not to let him speak and I think this was a big mistake.
UPDATED: White nationalist Paul Fromm denied permission to address council Fromm reacted by calling council closed-minded and undemocratic.
UPDATED: White nationalist Paul Fromm denied permission to address council Fromm reacted by calling council closed-minded and undemocratic

Hamilton city councillors have refused to hear from white nationalist Paul Fromm and a local yellow vester.
Councillors have refused to hear in person from white nationalist Paul Fromm and a local yellow vester who had asked to delegate at city hall.
The far right leader, who infamously ran unsuccessfully for mayor locally in the last election, had asked to speak to council about whether the city’s planned new hate prevention policy limits free speech. A new draft of the policy is expected to come out next month.
Via email, Fromm called council “closed-minded” and “undemocratic” for rejecting his request and criticized the “poisonous” Spectator for an editorial calling on councillors to deny him a speaking opportunity.
The news of his request spurred outrage and letters from citizens and groups like the Hamilton Centre for Civic Inclusion urging council to deny a platform to Fromm, arguing city hall is supposed to be a safe space for all residents.
Residents were quick to enumerate Fromm’s notorious past online, including his support for Holocaust denier Ernst Zundel and links to white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups past and present.
Councillors unanimously supported a motion from colleagues Sam Merulla and Chad Collins to deny the request.
There was no debate on the vote. But Merulla said afterwards he believes it is important to “not provide oxygen” to “radical” individuals who espouse a lack of tolerance toward marginalized groups.
Other councillors also specified ahead of time which way they would vote.
“As an elected representative of the people of Hamilton, it is my duty to uphold the integrity of Council Chambers,” tweeted Coun. Nrinder Nann ahead of the vote.
Her comments echoed those used by government members in Ottawa to deny Parliamentary press gallery entry to Fromm more than a decade ago “to preserve the dignity and integrity of the House.”
.
Councillors spent more time debating a request to speak at council from Lisa Thompson, a member of the controversial Yellow Vest group that often protests in front of city hall.
Coun. Lloyd Ferguson and Terry Whitehead argued council needs to ensure it has a good reason to deny citizens a chance to speak.
“We don’t need to accept what they say,” said Ferguson, who noted council previously agreed to hear a different group member.
Coun. Maureen Wilson, however, said council could reject the delegation request on procedural rather than ideological grounds. She argued Thompson’s desire to talk about the internal workings of the fractured local yellow vest group is “not germane” to council.
All council members but Ferguson eventually voted to deny Thompson’s request.
Coun. Judi Partridge was not present at the meeting.
Recent articles by Matthew Van Dongen
BLOW IT OUT YOUR EAR, BERNIE!
The Poisonous HAMILTON SPECTATOR Claims Freedom for Itself but Urges City Council to Prevent Paul Fromm Speaking as a Delegation
The Poisonous HAMILTON SPECTATOR Claims Freedom for Itself but Urges City Council to Prevent Paul Fromm Speaking as a Delegation
[The Hamilton Spectator is a far left fake news smear sheet So out to lunch is it that while it practises freedom of the press with impunity — in fact, for all the smear stories they’ve done on me in the past year, they have only once ever called me for an interview –.it wishes for Hamilton City Council to deny me the right to speak for five minutes as a delegation later this month. In Ontario, local councils and school board set aside time at the beginning of their meetings for “delegations”. Normally, a person or group with a concern registers to get on the list and is assigned five minutes to air their views. Back in August, I sought to apply to be heard as a delegation in order to air my concerns as Director of the Canadian Association for Freedom of Expression in light of Council’s instructions to staff in May to explore plans to prevent “hate groups” (the Yellow Vests and Christian pastors critical of the LGBTQ crowd) from holding protests on public property. This was actually being suggested for Hamilton, not Havana.
Here the Spectator says I should be silenced. The two Ottawa incidents to which they refer involved access to the Parliamentary Press Gallery. I had twice booked the Parliamentary Press Gallery for a half hour news conference. I have done this many times. On these two occasions, I was banned entry to the Parliament Buildings where the Press Gallery studio is located. Jason Kenney, the loyal Zionist waterboy was acting on a complaint by the pro-censorship group B’nai Brith. — Paul Fromm]
Editorial: When a white nationalist comes knocking …
Hamilton city council needs to take very seriously its deliberations about whether to allow infamous white nationalist Paul Fromm to delegate at an upcoming meeting.

Hamilton city council is under no obligation to allow Paul Fromm’s views a soapbox in a public meeting, held in a space owned and paid for by taxpayers. – Rene Johnston , Toronto Star file photo
Governments at all levels and of all stripes need to be very careful that they don’t abuse their positions of trust, including their commitment to be open, responsive and accessible to citizens. That’s central to their commitment to the democratic process and civic engagement.
That is why Hamilton city council needs to take very seriously its deliberations about whether to allow infamous white nationalist Paul Fromm to delegate at an upcoming meeting. Apparently, Fromm is worried about council’s proposed hate-prevention policies. Not surprisingly, he argues they limit free speech. “I don’t think it’s up to city council to play referee on various points of view,” Fromm said in an interview with The Spec’s Andrew Dreschel. “I was shocked I was hearing this in Hamilton, not Havana.”
Fromm knows very well there are already limitations on free speech. For example, your right to say what you want becomes illegal once you use it to make hateful comments about other people or groups. This, among other things, is what Fromm and groups he’s been involved with have done over a long career of far-right activism.
Fromm was a supporter of Ernst Zundel, who denied the Holocaust. Back in 2007, then-Conservative MP Jason Kenney successfully moved a motion to deny Parliamentary admission to Fromm and an associate “to preserve the dignity and integrity of the House.” The same thing happened in 2016 when Fromm tried to call a news conference in Parliament.
These setbacks didn’t deter Fromm. He ran for mayor in Mississauga when he lived there. He later moved to Hamilton and ran for mayor here in the 2018 municipal election. He has been an executive with white supremacist organizations. He has ties to former Ku Klux Klan members David Duke, Don Black and Mark Martin. The National Post described him as “one of Canada’s most notorious white supremacists.” In 2009 he participated in a White Pride march organized by the Aryan Guard, a neo-Nazi gang in Calgary.
Fromm is also, in his own estimation, a bit of an expert on semantics. All of these past activities don’t make him a racist or white supremacist. Rather, he argues, he is a white nationalist, committed to ensuring the “founding peoples” of Canada are not washed away by “waves of mass immigration.” (He’s not referring to founding Indigenous people, by the way. Only the white European ones.)
So, does any of this mean Fromm shouldn’t be welcome as a delegate to city council? The short answer is yes.
Odious as he and his views are, they are not illegal. He is free to hold them, and even to talk about them, provided he can do so in a manner that doesn’t promote hatred against identifiable people or groups.
But city council is under no obligation to allow those views a soapbox in a public meeting, held in a space owned and paid for by taxpayers. To do so would imply a degree, even if only a small one, of legitimacy to opinions based in bigotry.
Back in 2007, Kenney said this about his motion which successfully stopped Fromm from claiming Parliament as his podium: “If they want to get a soapbox and go out in front of the Parliament buildings in this free country, they’re welcome to do so, but this House isn’t going to let them use public, taxpayer-funded resources.”
Kenney was right 12 years ago and city council would be wise to make the same determination about Fromm’s delegation.


