So, You Think Norway is Part of the “Free World”: Moslems Invade but “Security” Police Arrest & Deport White Nationalist Author
The American pro-white nationalist Greg Johnson has been arrested in Oslo, where he was presenting at a conference organized by the network Scandza forum.
The American All Right profile Greg Johnson.
The American nationalist and alt-right profile Greg Johnson has been arrested by the Norwegian security police PST with reference to the Aliens Act.
Johnson was in Oslo to lecture at the international conference Scandza forum when he was arrested.
PST’s press spokesman Martin Bernsen tells NRK that Johnson has been arrested and expelled because of the political opinions he expressed.
– He can play an obvious radicalization role. He will be dispatched from Norway as soon as possible, says Bernsen.
PST accuses Johnson of supporting political violence and of defending Anders Behring Breivik’s terrorist act in 2011.
Johnson himself denies this in a written statement and says that PST has taken what he has written about Breivik out of context.
The conference organizer Frode Midjord also distances himself from violence.
– Right-wing extremism means violence as a method, and we are far from that. We want a political debate, Midjord tells NRK.
Outside the conference room where Scandza’s forum was held in Oslo, a large number of left-wing counter-protesters had gathered.
The situation turned violent when the left-wing extremists broke the police’s barricades to try to get into the conference room. 25 counter-protesters were arrested for disorderly order.
Greg Johnson describes himself as a racially conscious nationalist and advocates a white ethnostat. He opposes immigration and multiculturalism and is often accused of being anti-Semitic.
Johnson is a Ph.D. in philosophy, he has published over 40 books and since 2010 has been editor-in-chief of the nationalist publisher Counter-Currents Publishing.
Some time ago it was revealed that the gay Greg Johnson is part of a gay network within the alt-right sphere in the United States.
INTERVIEW. A refugee
centre next to the school. Teachers fired for standing up for freedom of
opinion. A majority of foreign pupils. What is life like at a Swedish
high school? Nordfront interviews Filip from Gothenburg to find out.
Stock photo. Photo: Holger.Ellgaard (CC BY 4.0.)
In the middle of the Christmas festivities, a friendly high school
pupil from Gothenburg takes time out of his holidays to meet for an
interview.
“I’m a completely normal guy who likes books about subjects that
aren’t always on the curriculum,” says Filip when he is asked to
describe himself.
Filip is passionate about justice, the truth and morality. This
becomes clear when he explains why he took a liking to these books. How
did you develop this interest?
Social studies and history class started it all. Feminism and WWII
sped up my interest in forming my own opinion about things because the
lessons felt very left-wing-orientated. School left out a lot of
information they didn’t want us knowing about.
Opinions cause complications
This interest has led to certain complications. Filip began his high
school education at a school in Gothenburg where he was one of a dozen
Swedes among 500 pupils. It was impossible to study in peace so he
changed schools. Today he attends a school south of Gothenburg. He
studies social and behavioural sciences.
“Originally I wanted to be a policeman, but I’ve changed my mind
after having seen how the police treat dissidents like me and my
friends.”
It’s clear pupils can’t hold whatever opinions they want to,
especially not when they contradict the school’s core values. That’s
when it gets complicated. What are your political views?
“I am openly National Socialist,” answers Filip proudly and says that
he almost exclusively socialises with nationalists and preferably
National Socialists. “There have been some discussions with the head
teacher and SÄPO [the Swedish secret police] on account of my views.”
Thinking what you want in school is not allowed, not even for teachers.
“There was a teacher who was good, but he was fired for standing up for freedom of opinion.”
A majority of foreigners
Filip thinks the school he goes to today is somewhat better than his
last one, but Swedes are still in a minority. How are things with the
foreign pupils at the school?
“There are loads of f–king foreigners. The majority are foreigners.
Grown men pretending to be children. There is a refugee centre right
next to the school.
“My class is one of those with the most Swedes, but the foreigners create loads of problems.”
The environment in the classroom seems to be chaotic, to say the
least. It isn’t surprising that school performance is plummeting. What’s
it like during breaks?
“It’s very noisy and loud. There are hardly any places where you can
have a quiet moment. The feminists and foreigners shout and scream. The
feminists are probably the worst. They are always discussing sexuality
and gender issues. They scream, ‘Rapist!’ at all the Swedish boys who
aren’t feminists, but they’re also careful to avoid being called
racists.”
The knifeman
Filip describes his school as generally similar to most other schools.
“The schools vary a little depending on where you live, and the
topics of conversation can become more sensitive depending on the
school’s demography.”
Filip comes across as mature for his age and expresses himself very
well, using words that are quite uncommon at high school. But one or two
expletives still slip through. Have there been any notable incidents
worth mentioning?
“There was a dispute during a lunch break when foreigners called one
of my friends a whore and threatened to f–k her mother. They were asked
to leave the area, but they came back a few hours later with an older,
very big immigrant who was armed with knuckledusters and a knife. His
intention was clear: he wanted to kill us. By chance, a teacher managed
to avert the incident and call the police.”
The incident happened in the school’s corridors. The teacher who
fortunately came to the rescue escaped with just a couple of violent
shoves. What are the teachers like at the school?
“They are good at teaching the system’s programme. Most of them are
wimps and do everything they can to avoid being called racists. When
it’s noisy during class, they say, ‘Stoppp it’,” Filip says in a wimpy
voice, mimicking his teachers.
He says sometimes extra teachers are brought in, but that rarely helps. Do the teachers have any apparent political affiliation?
“Definitely!” he answers quickly. “Several teachers say things like,
‘The Sweden Democrats are real Nazis. I’m voting for Feminist
Initiative!’”
And if they’re questioned, how do they react?
“They go into defence mode. They can’t justify it, but they still express their personal opinions in school.”
Gang rape
What are things like for the girls at school?
“Swedish girls are continually harassed and even groped. But the head
teacher doesn’t care. They are called all the usual things like whore,
c–t and bitch, but also sharmota and other Arabic names.”
He doesn’t know if anyone has been raped at the school yet but says
he has a relative who was gang raped. Have you helped anyone who has
been assaulted?
“Yes! Me and my friends have helped girls in the town who were harassed by immigrants.”
How did you become interested in politics?
“When I was younger, I was probably more of an ordinary racist, but
after understanding the Jewish question, I became NS. I realised that
immigration and immigrants are a symptom of a bigger problem.”
Strike back!
To conclude this interview, is there anything you’d like to say to young people in schools around Sweden?
“We Swedes have kept silent for far too long, and that is why we have the problems we do. A fitting message might be: Swedish youth, strike back!”
Nordfront thanks Filip for his participation in this
interview and hopes his words can inspire more people to start doing
something to improve the situation for our schoolchildren.
(Picture
left) The “hate crime” for which I am now slated to go on trial for
this coming June 2020. Handing out 3500 zombie safe sex packages AKA
known as life saving Gospel literature to naked sodomites and others at
the 2016 Toronto homosexual pride parade. (Picture right) Bill Whatcott
poses with two Toronto police officers while taking a break from handing
out zombie safe sex packages at the unGodly pride parade.
Dear Friends,
Yesterday was my last day of court before my trial,
The
Crown Prosecutor tried to argue quite forcefully that I had a “deep and
complex hatred of homosexuals.” Multiple times during the hearing the
prosecutor reiterated “Whatcott hates homosexuals” and at least once the
Prosecutor asserted I have an “intense and ongoing hatred of
homosexuals.”
For proof of this alleged intense (apparently
selectively criminalized) emotion that I am carrying with me the
Prosecutor wants to introduce social media posts and flyers that I have
penned over the decades into evidence where they can pull words like
“sodomite,” “freak,” and “homofascist” out of the paragraphs to
establish my alleged hatred of homosexuals.
The
Crown Prosecutor pulled the word “freak” out of a January 2019 post on
this site where I referred to this guy walking around with a pride flag
stuck out of his bum as a “freak.” Here is the post the Prosecutor cited
as evidence of my “hatred of homosexuals:” viewtopic.php?f=16&t=10744&p=26366&hilit=pride+flag+bum#p26366
When
you engage in behaviour worthy of ridicule what am I supposed to call
you? In my world if you run around naked with a pride flag sticking out
of your bum you are a freak…… For a Prosecutor to use my reality
based assessment of a homosexual’s highly public behaviour as evidence
of criminal intent worthy of 18 months incarceration is highly
disturbing and I wonder when Canadians will wake up and forcefully
demand their God given right to speak sanely once again?
While
the word “sodomite” is a behaviour based word that is pejorative in the
Bible, so are the words “adulturer,” “thieves,” and “sorcerers”
pejorative in the Bible. In my circle of friends I have people who have
stolen, who have committed adultery, and who have engaged in homosexual
acts. In Canadian law we can quite correctly seperate acts of adultery
and stealing from a person’s innate genetic make up. We know people may
experience seemingly irresistable urges to steal or sleep with someone’s
spouse, but we also know that people are morally responsible when they
commit this behaviour and that people who engage in this behaviour will
often change, especially when they seek moral guidance and desire to
change these unhealthy behaviours in their lives. Sadly, with homosexual
behaviour there is a huge disconnect with reality and it seems time
tested rules that apply to other sexual behaviours are hysterically
attacked and in some cases even criminalized when they are applied to
homosexual behaviour. Truthfully critiquing homosexual behaviour and
pointing out its harm is now simply called “hate” and is banned.
Of
course Christians condemn stealing, but don’t hate people who steal and
we will always condemn sodomy (even though the Prosecutor doesn’t like
me saying it, sodomy does have significant economic and social costs
that are being born by all Canadians) but that does not mean we hate
sodomites. In fact we know thieves and sodomites (and all other sinners)
can change.
“Or
do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of
God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters,
nor adulterers, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor
drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.
And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you
were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit
of our God.“ 1 Corinthians 6:9-11
But heck now
Bill S202 has passed first reading and it seems to me the homosexual
activist media is pushing this bill with complete garbage stories of
multitudes of homosexuals committing suicide after being told by some
evil and crazy Christian therapist that they can change their sexual
behaviour if they are motivated to do so, and now our homosexual
activist Prime Minister is supporting the bill which will make such
Christian counselling an indictable offense punishable by up to five
years in prison.
And yet the Prosecutor pulled the word
“homofascist” out of my writings and acted like this particular word is a
made up delusion and more evidence of my “intense and ongoing hatred of
homosexuals.”
Is it possible that this word might actually apply
when referring to Canadian politicians and LGBT activists who want to
see Christian counsellors put in prison for 5 years or Christian
activists jailed for 18 months who hand out “zombie safe sex” packages
on the streets of Toronto during “Pride” month?
Please pray for truth and true justice to prevail in this hate crime case.
It
looks like my trial is definitely going forward for June 2019. The
trial will last a month and I will need to be in Toronto for two weeks
before the trial begins to work with my lawyer.
No money is
needed for legal expenses as that is covered by legal aid now, but I
will need some donations to survive for the 6 weeks that I will be
forced to reside in Toronto for my trial.
At this point in time there is no news on my appeal in Whatcott vs Oger
where I (as predicted) lost in the British Columbia Human Rights
Tribunal (BCHRT) the case that Mr. Ronan Oger prosecuted me for saying
he was a man and that God did not want Vancouver-False Creek residents
to vote for him during the last provincial election. The penalty for
refusing to call him a woman during my hearing and for participating in
the provincial election by advancing a reality based perspective, based
on an orthodox Christian perspective, was a whopping $55,000 fine.
No news yet on when my trial date is coming in the Jonathan Yaniv vs Whatcott
case either. In this case Mr. Yaniv is seeking over $35,000 in
compensation from me because I refered to him as a man and criticized
his prosecution of 16 female estheticians who he dragged to the BCHRT
for refusing to wax his balls.
As Canada moves further away from
the God who created us and who desires Lordship over our lives, it seems
we are inventing ever stranger notions of what justice and human rights
looks like. Please pray for God to deliver Canada from this darkness
that is gripping our land and that He will have mercy and heal this land
so that we can have leaders capable of discerning real justice and
pray the Canadian people will see their need to repent and turn to the
Living God so they can be reconciled with their Lord and the Saviour of
their souls once again.
“If
my people who are called by my name humble themselves, and pray and
seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from
heaven and will forgive their sin and heal their land.“ 2 Chronicles 7:14
Jim and Diane Present LADY MICHELE RENOUF JAILING THE LAWYER by Horst Mahler Other Political Prisoners Sylvia Stolz, Ursula Haverbeck, Alfred Schaefer Dec 7, 2019
Jim and Diane Present
LADY MICHELE RENOUF
JAILING THE LAWYER
by Horst Mahler
Other Political Prisoners Sylvia Stolz, Ursula Haverbeck, Alfred Schaefer
Dec 7, 2019 https://www.bitchute.com/video/khVEFb2JLIZV/
FROM LADY MICHELE RENOUF to JIM AND DIANE, Dec 7, 2019
It
occurs to me that while both Horst Mahler and Sylvia Stolz are
currently in prison, this old film I made called “Jailing the Lawyers”
has ongoing currency and evermore pressing relevance for public
awareness of the plight of attorneys and even judges who must ignore
normal courtroom practice or face long jail terms. Horst describes the
situation for attorneys and the little known legal achievement of
Attorney Stolz.
This
unique interview with Horst took place in Sylvia’s home during the
period of her earlier three years of incarceration for defending Ernst
Zündel “too well”. Since then, she has been returned to jail for her
speech in Switzerland which concerned only a recounting of her prison
sentences; while Horst who has severe diabetes has had both legs
amputated yet must remain behind bars possibly for the remainder of his
life for the “crime” of expressing his peaceful philosophical opinions and for defending his clients “too well”:
There are two other films I have made concerning Horst Mahler:
1.
About the demonstration against Horst’s imprisonment in Brandenburg
where Ursula Haverbeck and the attorney Wolfram Nahrath address the
March.
2.
The other is a further interview in a Munich restaurant during the
brief period when Horst was not behind bars. He speaks about
spirituality.
I
am uploading these on Bitchute and will send you the urls in case you
might like to release all three. Rather important that these two
veteran attorneys and their grotesque plights are brought to the
attention of the public.
I believe you both will enjoy, as well, his opinions on National Socialism!
Cheers, Michèle
GERMAN POLITICAL PRISONERS
WRITE TO SYLVIA STOLZ at the following address:
Sylvia Stolz
Münchener Str. 33
86551 Aichach Germany
Write to Ursula Haverbeck at the following address:
by Lawrence Blanchard, ND, M.Div. Did you see the two stories that appeared recently about a law student and law professor who challenged the tolerance and diversity program in America? The challenge exposed the glaring hypocritical exception of the high and mighty advocates pushing tolerance and diversity down our collective throats. “Truth be damned” should be their motto. The first story was about a law student at the Oklahoma City University of Law who “left some flyers”1 around the school with the phrase, “It’s Okay to Be White.”
The law school dean went ballistic, promising an “intentional and relentless” promotion of diversity to counter such a notion. Police were called to investigate to see if “the flyers” and this “person’s actions amounted to a hate crime. They wanted to make sure this student was “not a threat to other students.”
“The OCU police department reportedly partnered with the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force to locate and interrogate the student activist.” 1
EDMONTON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (jccf.ca) is
pleased with the January 6, 2020 decision of the Alberta Court of
Appeal, which rejects the University of Alberta’s imposition of a
$17,500 security fee on UAlberta Pro-Life. Demanded by the University in
2016, this security fee had prevented the small student club from
hosting educational displays on campus. Analysis of the decision is
ongoing.
The case arose in March of 2015, when the University of Alberta condoned
the behaviour of a mob that physically obstructed a peaceful,
stationary pro-life display on campus, which had been authorized and
approved by the University. The mob used sheets, towels, banners, and
mega-phones, making it impossible for passers-by to view the signs. The
mob effectively silenced intellectual discussion and inquiry, in
violation of the Code of Student Behaviour. Prior to this physical
obstruction and disruption of a university-approved campus event, the
University’s president had stated publicly that the pro-life group was
entitled to express its opinions on campus. Then-president Indira
Samarasekera stated the University must facilitate and protect the
peaceful expression of all views, regardless of popularity.
Dr. Samarasekera’s statement was not taken seriously by campus
security or by the students who violated the Code of Student Behaviour.
The University’s campus security repeatedly told members of the
obstructing mob that they were violating the Code of Student Behaviour,
which expressly prohibits interrupting and obstructing
university-related activities and events. Yet campus security took no
action to stop the obstruction, or to discipline the students who
identified themselves publicly and boasted on social media about their
success in silencing a message they disagreed with.
In 2016, UAlberta Pro-Life applied again for a two-day campus event
with a stationary display. The University then demanded a $17,500
security fee as a condition for going ahead with this campus event.
In an email, the
University demanded that pro-life students pay for the wages of
security guards and police, and costs of barricading the venue, and pay
for the potential misconduct of people violating the University’s Code
of Student Behaviour by obstructing and disrupting the display. Rather
than render an invoice to the self-identified and self-confessed
rule-breakers, the University instead told the small pro-life club that
it could no longer set up a display on campus unless it first paid
$17,500 in security fees. Unable to pay $17,500, UAlberta Pro-Life was
forced to cancel the event that was planned for February 2016.
“In issuing this demand, the University of Alberta ignored the fact
that any threat to safety and security that may have existed on campus
came uniquely from those who physically obstructed and loudly
interrupted a university-approved event,” stated lawyer John Carpay,
president of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, which
represents the students in their court action.
In its court application, filed in April of 2016, UAlberta Pro-Life
sought a declaration that the University’s imposition of the $17,500
security fee on the club was illegal and unjustifiably violated the
fundamental Canadian value of freedom of expression, protected by
section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The court
application asked for an order prohibiting the University from imposing
such financial burdens on law-abiding students in future.
The court application also sought a ruling that the University made
an unreasonable and therefore illegal decision in March of 2015 to
condone the conduct of students who disrupted and blockaded the
University-authorized UAlberta Pro-Life campus event, in violation of
the Code of Student Behaviour. Although the University had
advance notice that a mob was being organized to obstruct the display,
and although Dr. Samarasekera had warned that any misbehaviour would be
investigated and prosecuted, the University of Alberta Protective
Services (UAPS) did nothing to stop the blockading and physical
obstruction. UAPS also did not photograph or seek to identify any
blockading student, even though the Code clearly prohibits students from
disrupting or obstructing University-related functions.
Before taking court action, UAlberta Pro-Life first filed a formal
complaint in March 2015 with UAPS against the disruptive students who
had violated the Code of Student Behaviour. It took UAPS over eight
months to release a decision. On November 30, 2015 UAPS confirmed that
the University would not charge or prosecute students who had disrupted,
blocked and obstructed the March 2015 display on campus. This decision
came in spite of UAPS possessing ample photographic and video evidence
as to which students had violated the Code of Student Behaviour, in
addition to social media posts in which these blockading students
publicly boasted about their own behaviour.
The Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench ruled in favour of the University
in October 2017. The British Columbia Civil Liberties Association
(BCCLA) intervened before the Alberta Court of Appeal, in support of
freedom of expression. The students appealed, and now have a decision
from the Alberta Court of Appeal.
An economics instructor at the University of British Columbia thinks it’s “casual racism” for fraternity members to be allowed to lay wreaths at the school’s Remembrance Day ceremony.
“Economics instructor Maria Adshade took to Twitter to ask UBC president Santa Ono why fraternity members were allowed to lay wreaths at the school’s Remembrance Day ceremony.”
At 11:22 am, during the University’s Remembrance Day ceremonies, she tweeted at the President “wondering why frat boys are laying wreaths at the Remembrance (sic) Day Ceremony at UBC. Surely there are other more representative groups on campus to play this role?”
Adshade followed up her thoughtless and poorly timed tirade with accusations of bigotry, tweeting:
“Regardless of how any of you feel about me, you should not be supporting this casual racism.”
Racism? For allowing young men to honour the young men who died for their freedom?
CTV News reached out to her for comment and Adshade doubled down, saying:
“I stand by what I said. UBC prides itself on being an inclusive and diverse campus. That was not reflected today by the student representation at the ceremony today.”
Adshade, apparently not one to quit when she is behind, then made herself the victim of mean sexist frat boys and not her own bigoted public remarks, tweeting:
“The UBC Fraternity members who are commenting here are entirely free to voice their opinions. But know that your members who are emailing me threatening me with sexual violence are doing nothing to help your cause.”
However, she never produced any of these emailed “threats.”
UBC’s own website affirms the high cost their student body paid for freedom during World War 2, noting that 1,600 UBC trainees enlisted to serve in the war and 10% of those would not make it back home alive. UBC also became a school of choice for returning veterans.
Professor Woke-Scold doesn’t know the history of her own university.
Lieutenant Colonel Dr. John McCrae wrote his poem In Flanders Field during World War 1, the very same war that claimed his life. If he were alive today, Adshade would want him banned from laying a wreath too.
Jim and Diane Present
Alison Chabloz’
Second Arrest and Update, Jan 15, 2020
(Text, Not a Video)
Dear All,
Apologies for the lack of recent updates. First of all, some positive
news. Last Friday, January 10th (full moon), I was again in the dock for
my appeal against the National Probation Service (NPS), this time at
Derby Crown Court. To recap, the NPS had brought a retroactive breach
trial against me for publishing on my personal website during the
year-long Prohibited Activity Order which required me not to post or
participate on “social media outlets”. Once again, there were slight
procedural errors: the Crown’s barrister, Mr. Christopher Jeyes, had not
received the appropriate skeleton argument in good time, apparently
preventing the Crown and NPS from providing disclosure on how the
decision to breach me had been reached. The main issue here is Campaign
Against Antisemitism (CAA) applying political pressure and meddling in
my case – a fact they have freely admitted on several occasions. Sitting
with two magistrates, HHJ Egbuna told the court that it would be wrong
to listen to the evidence and submissions without first establishing
whether or not the decision to breach me constituted abuse of process. I
agreed to an adjournment. A two-day re-trial has been scheduled for
June 26th and 27th.
The most interesting revelation was the admission by the opposition that
the decision to breach me had not been taken by my probation officer’s
superior, but by someone “from the level above”. And now for the
not-so-good news. As I walked out of court, I was arrested under Section
127 of the 2003 Communications Act by one of four plainclothes
policemen – two of whom had been sitting in court. I had half-expected
it, having ignored another request for an interview under caution.
Still, I was annoyed. Ex-Britain First Intel Officer, half-Jewish Paul
Besser, was there to represent Joe Glasman’s Maccabees, Third Division.
As we reached the station, the officer who was driving (who I later
discovered was local and just helping out with a colleague) radioed the
desk. He announced that they were bringing in a woman “under the Public
Order Act”. Police lie to each other, as well as to the general public: a
nest of vipers. Of course, in hindsight, if I had resisted and these
officers had been caught on film using violence against me to drag me
into an unmarked car… I was interviewed about an Internet podcast, the
link to which had been shared on my GAB account. Replying mostly no
comment to their questions, it lasted an hour and a half and was utterly
Orwellian. No surprises for guessing the name of the “victim” – Stephen
Silverman, CAA Director of Investigations and Enforcement. Most
questions came directly from Silverman’s own witness statement. Others
were no doubt the result of police (combined with the intelligence
services?) seeking information, as well as a deliberate attempt to have
me incriminate myself. Apparently, because “most people” believe in the
gas chamber narrative, anyone who doesn’t believe is not “the norm”. I
couldn’t help laughing at the irony of being interrogated by police
detectives who unquestioningly believe every aspect of the mainstream
“Holocaust” narrative – and more: there were, according to DC E. of
Lincolnshire Police, homicidal gas chambers at Belsen. The entire
two-hour-long Internet podcast had been transcribed, and the offending
passages highlighted in yellow. At one point, when my solicitor was
absent from the room and the recording was halted with the tape still
running, I asked the detectives if they had any actual crime to
investigate, for example, child sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, still
free to travel the world at leisure. They told me they were unable to
answer… I wondered why both of these men were “good cops” and where
the “bad cop” might be. I soon found out. When the interview was over
and I was taken back to the lobby, I noticed sitting behind the desk
sergeant a dark-skinned, uniformed man with large brown eyes, long hair
and a black bandanna. His expression was not friendly. I was led back to
the custody cell and, twenty minutes or so later, this same man
unlocked my door. Standing behind him were both interviewing officers.
He was introduced as Detective Sergeant B… This man then proceeded to
verbally abuse me, stating he didn’t like my attitude and if he was
going to let me out of “his station”, then I would be forced to live and
sleep at a declared address. By the time they released me, it was
already too late to return home. I noted drily that police were
releasing me – a single woman – without any means of transport to the
address I was supposed to sleep at. That wasn’t all. My other police
bail condition is “not to post on line anything” – an unwarranted
restriction of my right to free speech and probably unlawful. The Crown
will now have to make a decision whether or not to charge me for
“grossly offending” a man who has a restraining order against me but who
nevertheless sees fit to stalk my every move in the hope of seeing me
once again clamped in irons for my views. Despite the presence of one
journalist in court – who refused to disclose who she works for (my
educated guess would be Isabella Nikolic For Mailonline) – and Besser’s
silly tweets, there has been no media coverage whatsoever. Likewise,
silence from CAA. Other usual stasi suspects, permanently ensconced in
the Twitter echo chamber, are unable to hide their glee that “a vile
anti-Semitic Holocaust denier” is once again being punished for
peacefully expressing her own opinions. CAA, a registered “charity”,
faces further embarrassment following Friday’s publication of Joe
Glasman’s “Christmukah” video by The Electronic Intifada, (see also
December, in my recent Review of 2019). Glasman’s copyright claims were a
case of closing the stable doors after the horse had bolted.
Thank you to all who sent supportive messages and especially to my
barrister, Adrian Davies, my solicitor, Kevin Lowry-Mullins, the
solicitor who represented me on Friday, Mr Raja, and to all four loyal
friends who made the effort to be beside me in court. Thanks also to
Sargon of Akkad who finally, after all this time, has spoken out about
my case and called for S. 127 to be repealed. Sargon is (wilfully?)
ignorant about the controversy surrounding the official narrative, but
he is nevertheless correct in stating that S. 127 is being abused in
order to criminalise opinions. My case is exposing the extent to which
this bad law is being used by the System to stifle peaceful protest,
historical debate and, most sinister of all, silence a musician for her
satirical songs and for her beliefs. Alison Chabloz. January 13th, 2020.
Activist acquitted because Quebec City prosecutors were incapable of holding trial in English
Basem Boshra
Supervising Producer, CTV News Montreal
@BasemBoshraContact
Published Wednesday, January 15, 2020 2:55PM EST
Last Updated Wednesday, January 15, 2020 5:59PM EST
Activist
Jaggi Singh is arrested during an anti-racism demonstration, in Quebec
City on Sunday, August 20, 2017. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jacques Boissinot
SHARE
301
MONTREAL —
Activist Jaggi Singh, who has been facing charges stemming from his
arrest at an anti-fascist protest held in 2017, walked out of Quebec
City court a free man on Wednesday after prosecutors announced they were
incapable of proceeding with Singh’s trial in English.
According to Le Journal du Quebec,
Steve Marquis, the chief Crown prosecutor for Quebec City, told Judge
Pierre Bordeleau that neither he nor any of his available colleagues
were capable of presenting the prosecution’s arguments in English.
(Singh, who is fluently bilingual, had requested a trial in English.)
Marquis – who told the judge that the original prosecutor in the case,
who could proceed in English, was on maternity leave – asked for a delay
in the proceedings, which Bordeleau denied. The judge then acquitted
Singh on the two charges, obstruction of justice and impersonation, that
he was facing.
Singh, 49, a veteran activist, was arrested Aug. 20, 2017, at an
anti-fascist counter-protest to an alt-right gathering. When arrested,
Singh told police his name was Michel Goulet (the name of an old Quebec
Nordiques player) and said he resided in La Colisee (the Nordiques’ old
arena).
Singh told Le Journal du Quebec on his way out of court that he felt
the prosecution sabotaged its own case rather than lose the trial, which
had been scheduled to run today through Friday.
