Free­dom of speech at risk, ex-prof argues

Wid­dowson turns to court after talk shut down by protest

Free­dom of speech at risk, ex-prof argues

Wid­dowson turns to court after talk shut down by protest

National Post - (Latest Edition)

Jesse snyder

15 Apr 2026

EDMONTON • A former uni­versity pro­fessor who became a con­ten­tious fig­ure for ques­tion­ing claims about the exist­ence of Indi­gen­ous unmarked graves says the out­come of her ongo­ing court battle will set a cru­cial pre­ced­ent for aca­demic free­dom in Canada.

Frances Wid­dowson, who launched a legal chal­lenge against Uni­versity of Leth­bridge in July 2023, had her argu­ments heard by a Court of King’s Bench judge on Fri­day. Wid­dowson, a former Mount Royal Uni­versity pro­fessor, argues that the Uni­versity of Leth­bridge restric­ted her right to free speech when it can­celled her pub­lic talk in Feb­ru­ary 2023.

Black­foot First Nation pro­test­ers and other demon­strat­ors pres­sured the uni­versity to can­cel the event, and then-pres­id­ent Michael Mahon con­sen­ted to their calls amid what the school describes as secur­ity con­cerns. Wid­dowson — who has promp­ted sim­ilar protests at two other Cana­dian uni­versit­ies — said the can­cel­la­tion mir­rors a wor­ry­ing trend of cam­puses restrict­ing pre­cisely the sorts of open debates they are meant to encour­age.

Frances Wid­dowson says First Nations deserve to have their struggles addressed on a found­a­tion of truth.

“People need to take this ser­i­ously, because uni­versit­ies are incred­ibly import­ant insti­tu­tions in a demo­cratic soci­ety,” Wid­dowson said. “They let know­ledge be dis­sem­in­ated, they’re import­ant in the train­ing of pro­fes­sion­als, and are also a bul­wark against author­it­ari­an­ism. All of those func­tions now are under threat, because you have insti­tu­tions like the Uni­versity of Leth­bridge, which is not aca­demic at all any­more and has been com­pletely cap­tured by Indi­gen­iz­a­tion act­iv­ists.”

Court hear­ings have focused on whether the uni­versity had an oblig­a­tion to pro­tect free speech in the face of the alleged “very real harms” of host­ing the event, accord­ing to a legal brief filed to the court by Wid­dowson’s law­yer, Glenn Black­ett. Fol­low­ing Fri­day’s hear­ings, a rul­ing is expec­ted in the com­ing months.

Wid­dowson has attrac­ted oppos­i­tion primar­ily for work in which she has doubted the claims put for­ward about Indi­gen­ous unmarked graves in Canada, with a focus on Tk’emlúps te Secwépemc, pre­vi­ously known as the Kam­loops Indian Band, which has claimed that 215 “miss­ing chil­dren” are bur­ied in unmarked graves on the site of a former B.C. res­id­en­tial school.

Nearly five years after the ini­tial claim, however, the First Nation has not exhumed the remains of any chil­dren. In a Feb­ru­ary update, the First Nation said its invest­ig­a­tion using ground-pen­et­rat­ing radar is ongo­ing. Wid­dowson has made a point of emphas­iz­ing the lack of evid­ence, includ­ing in a 2025 You­tube doc­u­ment­ary called “What Remains: After­math of the Kam­loops Mass Grave Decep­tion.” (A 2021 Assembly of First Nations res­ol­u­tion referred to the Kam­loops claims as an example of “burial sites or mass graves.”)

Wid­dowson said it was an “open ques­tion” whether any chil­dren were secretly bur­ied on the Kam­loops site but said the alleg­a­tions need to be scru­tin­ized and sup­por­ted. The graves are reg­u­larly cited as evid­ence of Canada’s alleged gen­o­cide against First Nations.

“Claims should be

asser­ted

NEVER BEEN A COMPLAINT ABOUT THE QUALITY OR ETHICS OF HER SCHOLARSHIP.

on the basis of reason, evid­ence and logic, not the basis of a pre­scribed doc­trine,” she said.

The planned Feb­ru­ary 2023 event was about how “wokeism” was under­min­ing aca­demic free­dom. Wid­dowson agreed to the talk on the invit­a­tion of Paul Vimin­itz, a pro­fessor who the uni­versity later fired in 2024. (Vimin­itz was pre­vi­ously a party to Wid­dowson’s Court of King’s chal­lenge, and Jonah Pickle, a former stu­dent, is cur­rently an applic­ant).

Wid­dowson has since called on the Alberta gov­ern­ment to inter­vene in her case, but the gov­ern­ment has thus far declined.

Eliza­beth Harper, spokes­per­son for Advanced Edu­ca­tion Min­is­ter Myles Mcdou­gall, said the province’s uni­versit­ies are oblig­ated to report on their free speech policies, adding that “the Uni­versity of Leth­bridge has been asked to review their policies to ensure that they sup­port free speech.”

Mat­thew Wood­ley, a law­yer at Reyn­olds Mirth Richards & Farmer LLP who is rep­res­ent­ing the Uni­versity of Leth­bridge, was not avail­able for an inter­view, accord­ing to his assist­ant.

In a state­ment, Uni­versity of Leth­bridge spokes­per­son Tre­vor Ken­ney said that the same week of the can­celled talk, Wid­dowson led two other lec­tures at the uni­versity without incid­ent.

“The Uni­versity can­celled a room book­ing for an event involving Frances Wid­dowson as the res­ult of con­cerns relat­ing to pos­sible harms raised by mem­bers of the Uni­versity com­munity, includ­ing safety risks,” Ken­ney said.

On May 27, 2021, the Kam­loops Indian Band, or Tk’emlúps te Secwepemc, claimed it had loc­ated the remains of 215 chil­dren — “some as young as three years old” — in an apple orch­ard at a former res­id­en­tial school site. The claims were based on the res­ults of ground-pen­et­rat­ing radar, which is cap­able of detect­ing ground dis­turb­ances but does not con­firm the pres­ence of human remains.

The next month, the Cowessess First Nation in Saskat­chewan said it had found 751 poten­tial unmarked graves at a cemetery near the former Mer­ieval Indian Res­id­en­tial School. (The Cowessess chief emphas­ized at the time that they were not mass graves, but unmarked ones.)

Some cit­ies includ­ing Vic­toria can­celled their Canada Day cel­eb­ra­tions that year, while the gov­ern­ment ordered the Cana­dian flag on fed­eral build­ings to fly at half-mast for sev­eral months.

Wid­dowson said Canada’s First Nations deserve to have their many struggles addressed on a found­a­tion of truth.

“If we don’t have the truth, we will not be able to fig­ure out the best way to organ­ize soci­ety,” she said. “That’s what’s happened to Abori­ginal people now, is that they’re being fed a whole bunch of false­hoods, which are mak­ing it impossible for Abori­ginal people to thrive and live full lives in mod­ern soci­ety.”

In Decem­ber 2021, Mount Royal Uni­versity, Wid­dowson’s former employer, fired her over alleg­a­tions that a series of tweets she had pos­ted were a form of har­ass­ment.

In 2024, an arbit­rator found that Wid­dowson’s dis­missal was unwar­ran­ted and that, des­pite her con­tro­ver­sial views, there had “never been a com­plaint about the qual­ity or eth­ics of her schol­ar­ship.”

University of Lethbridge Rats Out Prof. Hall to Alberta Human Rights Commission & Suspends Him With Pay On January 11

University of Lethbridge Rats Out Prof. Hall to Alberta Human Rights Commission & Suspends Him With Pay

 

On January 11, dissident University of Lethbridge professor, Tony Hall, who had been suspended without pay since early October, for his views critical of Israel widely circulated on the Internet, has now been suspended with pay, but his own university is filing a complaint with the Alberta Human Rights Commission — a mortal enemy of free speech. If found guilty by a body with loosey-goosey rules of evidence or threshholds for guilt, Prof. Hall could then, in the university’s view be legitimately fired, thus doing an end-run around academic freedom.

s: “Inline image 2
Professor Hall reports: “”This new communication is dated Dec. 19 but it was delivered to my door yesterday[ Is the mail really THAT slow? PF]
 
One of the agendas of Dr. Mahon and those behind them is to overthrow the authority of the collective agreement between faculty and administration (Handbook) by seeming to leave it to the Alberta Human Rights Board to justify my suspension outside the Handbook provisions. A quick way to describe the plan would be to identify it with the objective of union busting.
 
Here’s the provision at issue from the Alberta Post-Secondary Learning Act, 2003
 
(3) Subject to any existing agreement, a president may, in the president’s discretion, suspend from duty and privileges any member of the academic staff at the university and shall forthwith report the president’s action and the reasons for it 2003 Section 23 Chapter P-19.5 POST-SECONDARY LEARNING ACT 21 (a) to the board, and (b) to the executive committee of the general faculties council. 2003 cP-19.5 s22;2008 c25 
 
To some it seems obvious that the “existing agreements” that the Handbook and tenure are “existing agreements” that limit presidential powers to “suspend from duty and privileges any member of the academic staff at the university.” 

The Canadian Press (January 16, 2017) reported: “The University of Lethbridge says it is lodging a complaint with the Alberta Human Rights Commission about a

longtime professor accused of espousing anti-Semitic views.

Anthony Hall was suspended without pay in October following comments he made in online articles and videos suggesting there was a Zionist connection to the 9/11 attacks and that the events of the Holocaust should be up for debate.”

Thus, it’s quite clear that Prof. Hall’s crime is suggesting an Israeli connection to 9/11 and saying that the so-called holocaust should be debatable. And shouldn’t it?

The Canadian Press report continues: “From the findings of that assessment, the board has decided to proceed with a complaint to the Alberta Human Rights Commission against Dr. Hall for publishing statements, alone and in collaboration with others, that could be considered hateful, contemptuous and discriminatory,’ it said in a statement Monday.” Shockingly, the university assails academic freedom and seeks to get a kangaroo court to do its dirty work.

Prof. Hall is receiving some academic support: “Hall said the complaint is a way for administration to manoeuvre around its collective agreement with faculty.

‘It represents an enormous effort to change the landscape of higher education in Canada,’ he said. ‘I was ripped form the classroom mid-term in October and my students were deprived of the course they chose and the professor they chose.’

Both the University of Lethbridge Faculty Association and the Canadian Association of University Teachers criticized Hall’s suspension before any official finding of wrongdoing.”

Not surprisingly, the League for Human Rights (but not free speech) of B’nai Brith, Professor Hall’s chief tormenter, whose complaints led to his present persecution, is delighted: “Amanda Hohmann with B’nai Brith Canada said she’s pleased with how the university has handled the situation and says the reinstatement of Hall’s pay isn’t a vindication. Hohmann said Hall’s appearance earlier this month on a radio show posted on Stormfront — a white nationalist website that describes itself as a “community of racial realists and idealists” — shows the complaint is not an assault on the institution of tenure, as Hall argues, but a defence of human rights.

‘Instead of being repentant or apologizing for his behaviour, he’s doubled down and he’s gone even further down the rabbit hole of anti-Semitism,’ said Hohmann.”

So, silencing Professor Hall is “defending human rights”?

the censors have gone mad!

One wonders whether the Knights of Columbus could get a university to fire a professor who took issue with Catholic doctrine? Didn’t think so!

Paul Fromm

Director

CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION 

 

 

 

 

Anthony Hall, a University of Lethbridge professor, co-hosts a weekly YouTube show called False Flag Weekly News.

Anthony Hall, a University of Lethbridge professor, co-hosts a weekly YouTube show called False Flag Weekly News. (B’nai Brith/YouTube)