The Pro-Free Speech Work of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

admin@jccf.caMon, Sep 22, 3:38 PM (3 days ago)
to me

Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

Your donation equips our legal team to defend freedom in courts of law and in the court of public opinion.  We defend the Charter freedoms of expression, association, religion, conscience, mobility, and peaceful assembly, and democracy under the rule of law.

Justice Centre lawyers continue to defend Matt and Nicole Alexander, who were abruptly fired from their teaching positions for “not celebrating and affirming LGBTQ issues.”  There were no complaints against either teacher about failing to treat a student with respect and kindness.  Their union refused to take their grievances to arbitration.  However, we are pleased to announce that the Ontario Labour Relations Board recently ruled against an attempt by the Elementary Teachers’ Federation of Ontario and the Renfrew County District School Board to have the Alexanders’ case dismissed.  No Canadian should be fired for refusing to affirm and celebrate an ideology that contradicts their moral or religious convictions.

We continue to provide lawyers for BC nurse Amy Hamm, recently found guilty of “unprofessional conduct” by the British Columbia College of Nurses and Midwives because she said publicly that there are only two genders.  Amy’s professional regulatory body also ordered her to pay $93,639.80 in legal costs.  The legal battles continue.

On the east coast, Justice Centre lawyers are in court to challenge Nova Scotia’s irrational ban on walking in the woods, imposed by Premier Tim Houston.  Our lawyers represent Jeff Evely, a veteran of the Canadian Armed Forces.  Conservation officers fined him $28,872.50 for merely walking in the woods.  This anti-human law views people as the problem, rather than targeting higher-risk activities like smoking, campfires and cooking in dry, wooded areas.

We continue to defend peaceful Freedom Convoy protestor Chris Barber against the Crown’s demand that his truck, “Big Red,” be seized and that he spend the next eight years of his life in prison.  To imprison a man who sought and followed legal advice while peacefully protesting harmful Covid vaccine mandates would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

Justice Centre lawyers represent Terry Francois in a Federal Court case highlighting serious concerns about accountability and due process within First Nations governance.  The Indigenous father of five was banished without warning from his home and family on the Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation reserve in Manitoba.  “I was totally shocked. I felt crushed,” said Mr. Francois. “I’ve worked all my life and raised five girls on my own. I didn’t think this could happen.”   

Our lawyers continue to defend peaceful protestor Evan Blackman, who was arrested and charged with mischief and obstruction for his involvement in the 2022 Freedom Convoy.  Now, a court has ordered the RCMP and TD Bank to produce records related to the freezing of his bank accounts.  This ruling marks a significant step in the first Charter challenge to the freezing of personal bank accounts under the Emergencies Act.

The Justice Centre continues to collect petition signatures against Bill C-2, the Strong Borders Act (which I prefer to call the “Strong Surveillance Act”).The Bill would grant the federal government new regulatory powers over electronic service providers and would allow law enforcement to conduct warrantless searches.  The Bill would also outlaw cash transactions of $10,000 or more, which opens the door to eventually outlawing all cash payments and donations.   

I invite you to join the 35,000 Canadians who have signed our petition (www.jccf.ca/petitions) calling upon the Prime Minister of Canada to strike the criminalization of cash, and to table legislation protecting Canadian’s right to use cash of any amount for legal transactions. 

My new book, Corrupted by Fear: How the Charter was betrayed and what Canadians can do about it, is a #1 Bestseller on Amazon, with over 3,500 copies sold since January.  Corrupted by Fear exposes how some judges repeated the media narrative in their Covid court rulings, rather than considering the evidence that was placed before them in court.  The paperback, eBook and audiobook versions are available at Amazon.ca.

The deadline to enter the 2025 Brandon Langhjelm Memorial Essay Contest is fast approaching – October 26, 2025.  This year, we invite Canadians aged 15 to 25 to write on either the value of privacy or on the balance between freedom of religion and state neutrality.  Learn more about this contest at www.jccf.ca/essay-contest.  

The Justice Centre has released a new report, “Post-Covid Canada: The rise in unexplained deaths,” available at www.jccf.ca/reports.  Statistics Canada data shows that more Canadians are dying after the government imposed lockdowns and vaccine mandates.  According to Statistics Canada, the 2022 and 2023 death rate for children was 15% higher than in the years before lockdowns, and deaths among Canadians under the age of 45 are up by more than a quarter. Drug overdose deaths are up by 55%, and alcohol-induced deaths are up 18%.  The additional deaths among children and younger Canadians were not caused by Covid.  Incredibly, there was a 26% increase in Covid deaths after most Canadians had been injected with Covid vaccines.   

Follow the Justice Centre on X @JCCFCanada to receive exclusive updates, interviews and videos.  Justice Centre videos are also posted on our YouTube, Vimeo and Rumble channels.

The Central Bank Digital Currency brochure educates Canadians about the dangers of Central Bank Digital Currency.  If you would like extra copies to give away to friends, neighbours and family, please email info@jccf.ca or call our office at 403-475-3622.

Thank you for your continued support, which allows us to defend the free society in 2025.   

Yours sincerely, 

Signature

John Carpay, B.A., LL.B.

President

Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

The Jewish Lobby Group CIJA Strikes Again & Compliant Gov’t Bans Appearance of Irish Rapper Group Kneecap for Not Having “Canadian Values”

Irish rap group Kneecap have been banned from entering Canada

By

Max Saltman

10 hr ago

Irish-speaking rap group Kneecap performs at the Glastonbury Festival in the UK in June 2025. The trio was banned from Canada on Friday ahead of their October tour dates there.

Irish-speaking rap group Kneecap performs at the Glastonbury Festival in the UK in June 2025. The trio was banned from Canada on Friday ahead of their October tour dates there.Leon Neal/Getty Images

Irish rap group Kneecap have been banned from entering Canada ahead of their tour of the country on the grounds of alleged “hate speech” and “glorification of terrorism.”

“Recently the rap group Kneecap has engaged in actions and made statements that are contrary to Canadian values and laws that have caused deep alarm to our government,” Parliamentary Secretary for Combatting Crime Vince Gasparro said in a video announcing the ban Friday morning.

“The group have amplified political violence and publicly displayed support for terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah and Hamas,” Gasparro said.

The lawmaker noted that one member of Kneecap is facing terrorism-related charges in the UK. He also claimed that the band displayed “hate symbols that directly target the Jewish community,” though he did not specify what these were.

“That is why, as parliamentary secretary for combatting crime, I am announcing that effective immediately, the members of Kneecap have been deemed ineligible to enter Canada,” Gasparro said.

They were due to perform in Toronto and Vancouver starting October 14.

Kneecap responded to Gasparro’s allegations in a statement issued on X, calling the lawmaker’s claims “wholly untrue and deeply malicious” and announcing that they intend to file “legal action” against Gasparro.

“When we beat you in court, which we will,” the Belfast-based group said, “We will donate every cent to assist some of the thousands of child amputees in Gaza.”

The band further claimed that “significant Zionist lobbying groups” had pressured the Canadian government, including the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs and two others.

CIJA’s spokesperson Nicole Amiel told CNN Friday that CIJA had been “very vocal about them not being allowed to come into Canada.” In a statement Friday, the group welcomed Gasparro’s announcement as the “right decision.”

CNN has also reached out to Kneecap’s management and Gasparro for further comment.

This is only the latest controversy involving the outspoken Irish-speaking rap group, which was formed in Northern Ireland in 2017 and been praised for their efforts to revitalize the Irish language through hip hop.

The trio frequently speaks out against Israel’s actions in Gaza, often leading crowds in chants of “Free Palestine” at their shows.

The British government has accused one member, Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, of displaying a Hezbollah flag at a 2024 concert in violation of UK terror laws, in a case that is currently in the courts, with the next hearing on September 26.(CNN, September 19, 2025)

Canada’s Largest JewishCanada’s Largest Jewish Lobby Group the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs Howled “anti-semitism”: Reporter Fired

[It’s enough to make a rational person laugh. Elisa Serret, a reporter on French language Radio Canada argues there is considerable Jewish and Israeli power in U.S. politics.”  “It is the Israelis, the Jews, that finance American politics a lot,…  There is a big machine behind them, making it very difficult for Americans to detach themselves from Israel’s positions. It’s really money here in the United States. The big cities are run by Jews, Hollywood is run by Jews.” 
OK, those are her opinions. But are they true.? Jewish control of Hollywood goes back a century. Henry Ford warned about it in the 1920s. Marlon Brando noted their power as did actor/producer Mel Gibson.  Jewish author Neal Gabler even wrote a book boasting about this achievement. Wikipedia states:  ” An Empire of Their Own: How the Jews Invented Hollywood is a 1988 non-fiction book whose topic is the careers of several prominent Jewish film producers in the early years of Hollywood. Author Neal Gabler focuses on the psychological motivations of these film moguls, arguing that their background as Jewish immigrants shaped their careers and influenced the movies they made.” AIPAC, the America Israel Political Action Committee funnels huge sums of money to Congressmen and Senators of both parties, ensuring almost unanimous and largely uncritical support for the State of Israel. Money talks and principles walk. The few politicians who refuse to play ball can expect to be challenged by a well-funded opponent in the next primary.And then there’s the endless procession of politicians of both parties to Israel, the men usually slapping on a yamulke and bowing before the Wailing Wall. There is no such procession of American politicians to far larger traditional allies like France, Italy or Japan.
So, Elisa Serret’s comments are essentially accurate.
Canada’s largest Jewish lobby group the Centre for Israel and Jewish affairs howled:  

“Antisemitism is absolutely unacceptable on Canadian airwaves, especially on our public broadcaster. Yet these words were aired earlier today,” the group said on X on Monday, quoting some of the phrases used by Serret, who has worked for the public broadcaster since 2014. 

The group said it expected “immediate and unequivocal condemnation from all relevant leaders, including Heritage Minister” Steven Guilbeault. On Tuesday morning Guilbeault released a statement on X saying that “antisemitism has no place in Canada.”

And lo and behold, Canadian politicians jumped to obey. The very next day Heritage Minister” Steven Guilbeault. released a statement on X saying that “antisemitism has no place in Canada.” “The words used last night were pernicious antisemitic tropes and have absolutely no place on Canadian airwaves. When antisemitic language is used by journalists, or anyone in a position of trust, it risks normalizing hatred in deeply dangerous ways,” he said.

We ask, were Elisa Serret’s words true” They were. How is the truth hate? Even Guilbeault’s language mimics Jewish lobby denunciations of criticism of Israel. His accusation of “pernicious anti-semitic tropes” echoes statements regularly made by the ADL and Jewish writers. They love the seldom used word “trope.” I can say this as a person holding an M.A. in English Language, Literature and Linguistics, with considerable further post graduate studies. ” A trope refers to a figure of speech, turn of phrase, or idea that carries a deeper meaning beyond its literal meaning.” Elisa Serret’s comments are facts, not figures of speech.

Sadly, it would appear that unemployment will be the fate of this reporter with nine years experience, punishment for having crossed this powerful minority lobby.

Paul Fromm

Journalist ‘relieved from duties’ at Radio-Canada after Jewish group calls out ‘antisemitic’ comments

.

A journalist has been “relieved from her duties” at Radio-Canada, CBC’s French-language service, until further notice after a Jewish group condemned comments she made on air as “antisemitic.”

“My understanding, and that of multiple analysts here in the United States, is that it is the Israelis, the Jews, that finance American politics a lot,” said Elisa Serret, the Washington correspondent for Radio-Canada, who was speaking in French.

“There is a big machine behind them, making it very difficult for Americans to detach themselves from Israel’s positions. It’s really money here in the United States. The big cities are run by Jews, Hollywood is run by Jews…”

The comments were made in response to host and news anchor Christian Latreille asking Serret to break down why Americans “have such difficulty distancing themselves from Israel, even in the most difficult moments.”

This episode of sur le terrain (or “on the ground,” in English) aired on Monday. It covered U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s visit to Israel and meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

A clip of the episode was posted on social media by Jewish advocacy group, Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA).

“Antisemitism is absolutely unacceptable on Canadian airwaves, especially on our public broadcaster. Yet these words were aired earlier today,” the group said on X on Monday, quoting some of the phrases used by Serret, who has worked for the public broadcaster since 2014.

The group said it expected “immediate and unequivocal condemnation from all relevant leaders, including Heritage Minister” Steven Guilbeault. On Tuesday morning Guilbeault released a statement on X saying that “antisemitism has no place in Canada.”

He said the public broadcaster “belongs to all Canadians, and as leaders, we have a responsibility to hold it to account and demand the highest standards in journalism.”

“The words used last night were pernicious antisemitic tropes and have absolutely no place on Canadian airwaves. When antisemitic language is used by journalists, or anyone in a position of trust, it risks normalizing hatred in deeply dangerous ways,” he said.

The vice president for CIJA Quebec called the decision to suspend Serret “the only appropriate course of action” that Radio-Canada could have taken. Eta Yudin called the journalist’s comments “vile.”

“However, this incident cannot be allowed to pass without serious internal reflection on the damage such hateful rhetoric inflicts on our democratic values,” said Yudin.

“Antisemitism is corroding the fabric of our society. Its persistence is made possible by the very environment that enables it. We expect Canada’s national public broadcaster to recognize this reality and to take concrete steps to ensure that neither such comments — nor the systemic issues that enabled them to be aired — are ever allowed again on Canadian airwaves.”

In a statement released in French on Tuesday afternoon, Radio-Canada said the analysis by Serrat “about American policy in the Middle East led to stereotypical, antisemitic, false, and harmful allegations against Jewish communities.”

“These unacceptable comments contravene Radio-Canada’s Journalistic Standards and Practices and in no way reflect the opinion of the public broadcaster. As a result, newsroom leadership has decided to relieve the journalist from her duties until further notice,” the statement said.

“We recognize that these remarks have hurt many viewers. We are sincerely sorry and apologize.”(National Post, September 17, 2025)

Whatcott Update (photos and powerful videos), Charlie Kirk vigil, Alberta Legislature, September 14, 2025

Whatcott Update (photos and powerful videos), Charlie Kirk vigil, Alberta Legislature, September 14, 2025

Dear Friends,

On Sunday, September 14th I learned on short notice there was a vigil being held for Charlie Kirk at the Alberta Legislature in Edmonton. Given that it was short notice and it seemed those who hosted the event had very little lime to prepare or advertise the event, I decided I should go. I called a couple friends to let them know I was going and to see if they were able to go. My friend Doug said he was going to come. All in all I expected maybe 50 or at the most 100 or so people were going to be able to make it. The event seemed almost entirely promoted on people’s Facebook pages.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=ywEw_88nL8U%3Ffeature%3Doembed

Advertisement

https://edge.aditude.io/safeframe/1-1-1/html/container.html

My guess on how many people were coming to attend the vigil was way off. When I went to the Sean Feught concert a few weeks back, I estimated 2000 or so souls attended that event. For a Christian concert in Edmonton with considerable media fan fair and weeks of preperation and advertising, an attendance of 2000 people is actually pretty good. I can’t estimate how many people came to Charlie Kirk’s vigil, but it was bigger than the Sean Feught concert by a considerable margin. Probably more than 3000 people. In my view, this is something divine. Inspired by God Almighty Himself. This vigil was probably one of the largest if not the largest crowd of people at the Legislature in its history and as you will see from my videos, this was not really professionally organized and only advertised with less than 24 hours notice.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=rnYiWzBU_q0%3Ffeature%3Doembed

Advertisement

https://edge.aditude.io/safeframe/1-1-1/html/container.html

The organizers and most of those who spoke were ordinary Christians. When I went to the Alberta Independance Rally in the summer, I knew everyone who spoke. They all had Youtube channels and spoke at previous events. One or two of the speakers were published authors. I did not know any of the speakers at the Charlie Kirk vigil with the exception of my MLA Jennifer Johnson, who I was quite suprised to see speaking at this event. The lady speaking here is humble and real. Not a polished speaker, just someone who is honest about where she is at with God.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=IdHm8Jl5qF4%3Ffeature%3Doembed

The ordinary folks at the front exhorted us to defend the concepts of democracy and freedom and also exhorted us to not radicalize and become like the leftists turning to violence and hate.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=GAnBxSjV4gE%3Ffeature%3Doembed

Advertisement

https://edge.aditude.io/safeframe/1-1-1/html/container.html

Jennifer Johnson my MLA was awesome. I didn’t vote for her, as I had concerns she was compromising on LGBT issues and she was not as knowlegable as Daniel Jeffries on many issue pertinent to the province. I can see at this rally she has clearly grown in her faith and clearly she is not afraid to publicly witness for her Lord and Saviour. Her message of forgiveness for the assassin of Charlie Kirk also speaks volumes for her character.

For if you forgive others their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you, but if you do not forgive others their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.” Matthew 6:14, 15

https://youtube.com/watch?v=8mlUPZaIzf0%3Ffeature%3Doembed

Advertisement

https://edge.aditude.io/safeframe/1-1-1/html/container.html

A powerful song, a tribute to Charlie Kirk’s life and martyrdom.

When He opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain for the word of God and for the witness they had borne. They cried out with a loud voice, “O Sovereign Lord, holy and true, how long before you will judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth?” Then they were each given a white robe and told to rest a little longer, until the number of their fellow servants and their brothers should be complete, who were to be killed as they themselves had been.” Revelation 6:9-11

My next court dates are getting closer for my second “hate crime” trial.

For those who wish to learn more about this so-called “hate crime” prosecution Mass Resistance has done a wonderful job compiling my ministry to Toronto’s sodomites and the subsequent persecution I had to face here: https://www.massresistance.org/docs/info2/Bill-Whatcott-free-speech/Toronto-Pride-Flier.html

My next court dates are in the Ontario Superior Court in Toronto, Monday, October 27-Thursday October 30th. I will try to provide a link for those of you who wish to attend the hearings via zoom.

For those who wish to help with the expenses I am incurring as a result of this politically motivated prosecution. https://www.lifefunder.com/whatcott/

And we have known and believed the love that God has for us. God is love, and he who abides in love abides in God, and God in him.” 1 John 4:16

“No Man is an Island”

“No Man is an Island

James Dobson passed away on the 21st of August this year.  When I heard the news it was the first time in years I had heard his name.  The last time I heard his radio program, Focus on the Family, was probably in the 1990s.  Dobson was a prominent evangelical leader, although he was a psychologist by profession rather than a minister.  His father, James Dobson Sr., had been a minister in the Church of the Nazarene, one of the Wesleyan Holiness denominations, as had his grandfather and great-grandfather.  Dobson initially achieved celebrity status among evangelicals for advising parents to avoid the culture of permissiveness encouraged by the majority in his chosen profession and raise up their children with boundaries and discipline.   His first book, Dare to Discipline (1970) which is probably still his best known, was, as is evident from the title, on this subject.  In the decades since, he fought on several other fronts although   generally those which pertained to the type of issues that are categorized as moral and social, in the emerging culture war as it was dubbed in the early 1990s (1) around the time I first heard of him.

I first heard of Dobson’s passing, not through the news, but through a social media post by a former classmate with whom I had attended Providence College (formerly Winnipeg Bible College, now Providence University College) in the mid to late 1990s.  This post, and several others from the same former classmate whose name out of charity I shall omit, thoroughly disgusted me.  He did not merely disregard the ancient proverb de mortuis nil nisi bonum dicendum est but went out of his way to do the very opposite of it.  He took hearty delight in Dobson’s death and was positively rejoicing over it. 

I was reminded of this by the reaction of several American leftists to the murder of Charlie Kirk yesterday.  Kirk, the 31 year old founder and director of Turning Point, USA, was shot in the neck on stage during a question and answer session at an event at Utah Valley University.  He died from the wound later in the afternoon.  Kirk belonged to the Calvary Chapel Association, a Pentecostal group that separated from the Foursquare Gospel and from which the Vineyard movement would later separate.  Like Dobson, he had been a culture warrior.  Since youth was his target audience he made a lot of use of social media, he had a podcast and as of earlier this year a televised talk show.  He was also the author of a number of books.  He is probably best known, however, for going to university and other campuses and promoting his own views by, among other things, challenging overconfident progressive students to informal debates.

I am not going to reproduce the responses of the leftists here.  Chaya Raichik has reposted several on her Libs of Tiktok account on the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, the link to which you can find in the footnote. (2)   These are generally social media posts, exalting in Kirk’s assassination in a way similar to how my former classmate rejoiced over Dobson’s death.  In the news media, progressive commentators have made remarks to the effect that Kirk brought it on himself by the views he held and expressed.  Matthew Dowd, for example, said that Kirk’s “hate speech” had brought about “hateful actions” which remark itself brought about Dowd’s termination as a commentator on MSNBC.

You would think that liberals and leftists would take a break from accusing others of “hate speech” for basically saying things, usually true, about groups they think should be protected from criticism, when in the act of making remarks that essentially excuse a murder.  You would be wrong. 

I am not going to pretend that I was a big fan of Charlie Kirk.  The principle of de mortuis nil nisi does not require that. I agreed with him on most of the issues the liberals and the left hated him over – he was anti-abortion and anti-birth control, pro-gun, anti-CRT and DEI (Critical Race Theory and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion), etc.  He had all the qualities, however, that I had found obnoxious and grating in American Republicans even before the MAGA movement degenerated into a deranged personality cult.

One of the more obnoxious of those qualities was the assumption that everyone was either an American Republican or some kind of liberal, leftist or progressive.  Watching the disgusting manner in which people in the latter categories have been celebrating Kirk’s murder makes me all the more glad that this assumption is entirely baseless and false.  As a Canadian who finds the thought of his country become further Americanized utterly repugnant and as a dyed-in-the-wool monarchist and royalist I could never have any sympathy with American Republicanism but I have far less sympathy with the kind of politics that teaches people to be so totally devoid of class as to celebrate the deaths of their political opponents.  Liberalism and leftism are beneath contempt.

I direct any liberal or leftist who may have come across this essay to the poem by John Donne from which the title has been borrowed.   The third and final is the operative stanza. Now let us conclude with the traditional Requiem prayer for the late James Dobson and Charlie Kirk.  Rest eternal grant unto them, O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon them. May their souls and all the souls of the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen. — Gerry Lincoln

 (1)   The culture war itself, and the expression “culture war”, had both been around much longer, but it was in the early 1990s that the expression became attached to the thing itself as a kind of semi-official label.



Canada Is Officially the Dumbest Country on the Planet

Canada Is Officially the Dumbest Country on the Planethttps://www.facebook.com/EdieCornelius/videos/787017514270138/

TruthSeeker01011 is on multiple platforms including X and Instagram .. pass her posts to all of eur friends .. around the world !!!!

This Canadian woman is the Canadian equivalent of Leonarda Jonie . All of this woman’s posts on social media are incredible!

As Jesse Lee Peterson would say … “Amazing ! “

British Gov’t & Anifa Collaborate to Cause Violence Against Immigration Reformers

Janus Lee

sordptSoneg3P72g4h4h2g  atuu693:1g4207 0707s4Aua3M3t180 10lf  ·

“Britain is sliding into the oldest trap in the book – and the government is laying the bait. Across towns and cities, ordinary people protesting the collapse of their communities are being met not just by police lines but by choreographed mobs of left-wing activists, bussed in under banners like Stand Up to Racism. This isn’t spontaneous counter-protest. It’s state-sanctioned provocation.

The pattern is clear. Locals rally outside migrant hotels to demand their closure. Counter-demonstrators, backed by NGOs and shielded by police, descend to brand them “racist.” The two sides clash. Cameras roll. The headlines write themselves: far-right violence, public order crisis, threat to democracy. Suddenly, the story isn’t the government’s betrayal over immigration – it’s the need for more powers, more crackdowns, more control.

This is how you turn legitimate dissent into criminality. By baiting it, inflaming it, and then using it as the pretext for repression. The government doesn’t fear the leftist mobs because those mobs serve their purpose. They fear the ordinary British majority that is waking up to the reality of demographic change, cultural erosion, and the slow replacement of their birthright. That majority must be discredited and contained – and street clashes give the state exactly the excuse it needs.

Make no mistake: none of this is accidental. A government that wanted peace would listen to the people, end the hotel racket, and restore order by defending the border. Instead, it manufactures conflict at home while waving more arrivals through abroad. The goal isn’t resolution. It’s escalation – so they can claim extraordinary powers while painting patriots as extremists.

The riots aren’t the breakdown of the system; they are the system.

“Counter-demonstrators, backed by NGOs and shielded by police, descend to brand them “racist.””

Craig Lancaster

U.S. Victory Over Bubble Zones Around Abortuaries

Federal court rules for pro-lifers fighting ordinance to block sidewalk counselors

Issues·By Bridget Sielicki

Federal court rules for pro-lifers fighting ordinance to block sidewalk counselors

A federal court in New York awarded pro-life sidewalk counselors a significant victory, ruling that their constitutional rights were violated by a county law aimed at silencing pro-lifers outside abortion facilities.

Key Takeaways:

  • A federal court ruled that an ordinance in Westchester County, New York, which attempted to silence pro-life speech, was unconstitutional.
  • The plaintiffs, who had asked for only nominal damages, were awarded $1.
  • Attorneys plan to challenge another portion of the ordinance, which prohibits “following and harassing.”

The Details:

In an August 12 ruling, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled in favor of Oksana Hulinsky and Regina Molinelli, two pro-lifers who were unable to provide sidewalk counseling outside abortion facilities in Westchester County for several years due to a county ordinance which restricted pro-life activity near abortion businesses.

Represented by the Thomas More Society, the duo filed their lawsuit, Hulinsky v. County of Westchester, in 2022, claiming that the county’s law prohibiting “interference” outside abortion facilities was unconstitutional. As Thomas More Society reports, the ordinance “imposed a litany of severe restrictions on speech and assembly near abortion facilities, intending to restrict pro-life sidewalk counseling ministries in public spaces.” The law firm notes that “the county has since repealed or amended a number of those provisions in response to the Thomas More Society lawsuit.”

In its ruling, the Court agreed that the county’s actions in which it “criminalized large swaths of protected speech” were unconstitutional. Because the plaintiffs were seeking “nominal damages” in the case, the court awarded them $1.

Though the ruling is considered a victory, Thomas More Society said that it intends to appeal a prior court’s ruling that upheld a provision on “following and harassing,” noting that “the law vaguely defines [this] as ignoring an ‘implied request to cease’ on a public sidewalk.”

The Bottom Line:

“This ruling sends a powerful message to municipalities nationwide: vague laws targeting pro-life speech will not stand,” said Christopher Ferrara, Senior Counsel at the Thomas More Society.

“Westchester County’s pro-life sidewalk counselors seek only to offer compassionate, life-affirming alternatives on public sidewalks—as is their First Amendment right. Westchester’s arrogant overreach tried to silence their voices, but this decision helps reaffirm their constitutional freedom to share the pro-life message.”

Follow Live Action News on Facebook and Instagram for more pro-life news.

Issues·By Bridget Sielicki

Read Next

Read Next

Whatcott rejected by Alberta Human Rights Commission, Bike Edmonton, and even the occasional Christian, but accepted at Sean Feucht Concert

Whatcott rejected by Alberta Human Rights Commission, Bike Edmonton, and even the occasional Christian, but accepted at Sean Feucht Concert

Dear Friends,

Yesterday was a profound day. I headed to Edmonton and went to the Sean Feucht revival at the legislature grounds in downtown Edmonton.

This picture above is my favourite picture that I took at the concert/revival.

Me with my sign. Behind me is Sean Feucht on the stage singing Gospel music and delivering his message of revival and standing for Christ in a sometimes hostile culture.

Towards the end of the revival a friend who I met at the concert took my sign to hold it up after I got tired and sat down.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=bisUgSU71eQ%3Ffeature%3Doembed

Towards the end Sean Feucht lead a communion service. To my surprise he referred to Holy Communion as a sacrament, rather than merely an ordinance. On this point I agree with Sean Feucht. It is clear to me in Scripture that God instituted Holy Communion and it is more than merely an ordinance. Holy Communion has sacramental qualities.

“For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when He was betrayed took bread, and when He had given thanks, He broke it, and said, “This is my body, which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.”In the same way also He took the cup, after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me.” For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes.

Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup.For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment on himself. ” 1 Corinthians 11:23-29

After communion there was an altar call. The altar experience for me was surreal. Notwithstanding my smile in the above pictures, this past week I have been going through some emotional pain. I don’t believe men should be overly emotional/feminine, crying over every slight or disappointment. I have had some big losses recently, but was keeping things together when I went forward. While not the theme, Sean Feucht did mention in passing that God heals rejection and I was pondering that in regards to my past week experiences while at the altar. While pondering and hurting over this week’s events, a man who was a friend of mine for years, but ghosted me 3 years ago after a family member of his and one of his friends took advantage of me for thousands of dollars. This man walked by me and after praying for someone beside me, decided to pray over me.

The combination of my recent pain and then having this guy lay his hands on me was too much. I broke down as the inner pain was too severe. I don’t think the fellow knew what to do. He hugged me for a moment and then said “God bless you” and quickly moved on. I didn’t feel like being a spectacle at the altar so I composed myself and headed back into the crowd. The attendance appeared to be at least a couple thousand people at the concert, so it was easy to blend in the crowd.

Anyways, I also got the news below this week. No surprise. Alberta’s bureaucracy is almost as badly effected with homosexual activism and anti-Christian antipathy as any other province. Daniel Smith supports homosexual marriage and homosexual rights. She is also more tolerant of Christians, as evidenced by her government’s refusal to cancel Sean Feucht. But bureacracies like the Alberta Human Rights Commission (AHRC) are operating much as they did under Rachel Notley’s NDP government and the agenda of the AHRC is no different than the agenda of the Ontario Human Rights Commission or the British Columbia Human Rights Commission.

Anyways, for those not familiar with the complaint here is the video of Bike Edmonton kicking me out of their store. This is about as discriminatory and fitting of what a Human Rights Commission would allegedly deal with as it gets.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=1xVyOzYTd6Q%3Ffeature%3Doembed

As believers who follow Jesus and who are called to defend God’s definition of marriage and sexuality, I would encourage you to not be surprised or disheartened when you experience double standards and mistreatment. Even when it is one of your “conservative” government agencies doing it. Such was the case for those who followed Christ before us.

“Others suffered mocking and flogging, and even chains and imprisonment. They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were killed with the sword. They went about in skins of sheep and goats, destitute, afflicted, mistreated—of whom the world was not worthy—wandering about in deserts and mountains, and in dens and caves of the earth.

And all these, though commended through their faith, did not receive what was promised, since God had provided something better for us, that apart from us they should not be made perfect.” Hebrews 11:36-40

In Christ’s Service, Bill Whatcott