Vincent Reynouard tells Paul Fromm, director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression, about his life as a revisionist. Persecutions, searches of the Police, prison, exile, grievous loss of his family (two times…). Amazing!
by Bill Whatcott » Sun Feb 05, 2017 12:19 am
I am now at the Vancouver airport heading to my two day hearing for the $104 million lawsuit. My crime that I am being sued for being infiltrating the Toronto Perverted Sex Celebration and unGodly Pride parade, disguised as a zombie and sharing 3,000 redemptive Gospel packages disguised as “Zombie Safe Sex” packages.
The hearing will be held at
Osgoode Hall, 130 Queen Street West, Toronto, ON
The trial will be from 10:00 am to 4:00 pm both days and the hearing will apparently be taking place in the Osgoode Hall Courtroom
Demonstration in defense of religious freedom and free speech!
Wednesday, February 8 and Thursday, February 9, 2017 from 9 – 10 am
10,000 flyers containing a defense of Christian liberty and the editorial cartoon “Trudeau’s Chopper of Rights” will be delivered between February 5 – 10. I believe the organizers (not me) are looking for volunteers for this work. The excellent editorial cartoon can be seen here: http://www.billwhatcott.com
If you would like more information on the above prophetic witnesses please call me at (306) 861-6140 or e-mail me at:
billwhatcott @ gmail.com
A Toronto radio station 88.3 FM CIGQ is discussing the lawsuit. A friend e-mailed me the interview here. It can be heard live at noon on Sunday, Febrary 5th.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_Ol- … Tl5d18zbmM
Sadly the Toronto homosexual perverted sex and unGodly pride parade rejected my request to march as an open heterosexual Christian in their 2017 parade and banned me from all parades after that.
From Pam Paulsen
<office@pridetoronto.com>
Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 9:07 AMThis email represents our acknowledgment of receipt for email issued to office@pridetoronto.com – Subject: Bill Whatcott’s request to march in the 2017 Pride Parade as an Open heterosexual Christian – on February 1, 2017.Be advised, as communicated in August 2016, the Board has banned Gay Zombies Cannabis Consumers Association and Bill Whatcott from participation in the Pride Parade in 2017 and beyond.
Pam Paulsen
So much for diversity and acceptance! 
Ursula Haverbeck — German Free Speech Champion
At 88 years-plus, Ursula Haverbeck is an incredibly brave woman. With firm resolve, she has repeatedly challenged the Hollywood version of World War II, where the Germans are cast as the genocidal arch-villains. She says: ““It becomes clear that the Holocaust is the greatest and most enduring lie in history. It was needed in order to finally complete the centuries-long struggle for world domination by the Zionists, World Wars I and II were merely a preliminary stage for this achievement…»
Last year, she was sentenced to four years in prison for challenging Germany’s new secular state religion of “holocaust”, which has crippled a once proud people with debilitating debt. The thought crimes sentence and conviction is now at the first of four levels of appeal, another jailed dissident teacher Gunter Deckert explained. The process could take years.
Ursula Hedwig Meta Haverbeck-Wetzel is a German author and historical revisionist from Vlotho, Germany. Since 2004, she has also been the subject of publication offences for sedition relating to Holocaust skepticism.
Ruddy cheeked and spry, she greeted Paul Fromm, Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression, Paul Fromm at a January 28 gathering in Bonn to hear dissident traditional Catholic prelate Bishop Richard Williamson.
Asked by Mr. Fromm for her e-mail, she replied in good English: “I don’t have one. The police want me to get one. I don’t want to make their spying job easier,” she smiled with a conspiratorial twinkle in her eye.
Lady Michele Renouf, who introduced the Bishop, marvelled at Frau Haverbeck: “She fairly springs and dances when she walks.”
images/276268/Article/images/30106781/15835204-large.jpg
A meeting of ‘far right nationalists’ at Almondsbury Sports and Social Centre was raided by a suspected anti-fascist group
A gathering of ‘far right nationalists’ in a village social centre was raided by suspected anti-fascists who allegedly fired air guns, threw chairs and swung fire extinguishers.
Terrified onlookers were forced to barricade themselves inside as the balaclava-clad gang, dressed like a ‘special forces unit’, smashed the windows of Almondsbury Sports and Social Centre and attacked members of the meeting.
Three people were left injured after the raid against the group, said to be called the ‘Bristol Forum’, which one person said was formed of nationalists.
Read more: Bristol teen bike thief gang are bragging about their exploits with pictures and video online
Attendee Adrian Romilly said it is suspected the raiders were an anti-fascist group and likened the scenes to a ‘special forces’-style attack.
He described the event as a meeting of ‘far right nationalists’.
image: http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/images/localworld/ugc-images/276268/binaries/20170107_135219.jpg
Photos of the raid show balaclava-clad attackers in a confrontations with members of the meeting
“By the way [the attackers] acted they gave the impression they’d done this sort of thing before and their silence, dress and general ‘professionalism’ added to the sense of menace’,” said Mr Romilly, who lives in Plymouth but attended the meeting with a friend.
He said the meeting was made up of people who ‘discriminate in favour of [their] own people’.
Read more: 50 Shades of Red – Man captures footage of foxes in his garden but gets more than he bargained for
Mr Romilly described how the chaos unfolded at about 3pm on Saturday, January 7, one hour after the meeting started.
“I was asking one of the speakers a question, then there was a sound like a rifle shot and the first window glass splintered, shards of glass scattering over the place where the speaker had been sitting moments before,” he said.
“This was followed by a series of sharp cracks as a succession of windows were broken by a fire extinguisher and by chairs brought up from a lower floor.
image: http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/images/localworld/ugc-images/276268/binaries/20170107_135231.jpg
Three people were injured in the fracas, before police were called and the attackers fled
“While the windows were being broken several of the attackers were trying to force the entrance doors to the room in which the meeting was taking place.
“The doors were bulging and appeared to be about to give way but, fortunately, some of the audience counter-pushed and kept them out.”
Read more: Does this video show Banksy creating a piece of art?
Detectives investigating the raid said CCTV is now being reviewed in a bid to identify the raiders.
Mr Romilly said a ‘scuffle’ broke out in the landing area of the meeting room as police were called, before the attackers fled.
He urged anybody with information about the raid to give details to police.
The attackers ‘left no visiting card and carried out their work in silence’, he said.
image: http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/images/localworld/ugc-images/276268/binaries/venue12.png
The drama unfolded at Almondsbury Sports and Social Club, off the A38 Gloucester Road
A police spokesman said: “We’re investigating linked offences of criminal damage and assault following an incident at Almondsbury Sports and Social Club on Saturday 7 January.
“Several people tried to disrupt a private meeting being held at the venue and caused damage to windows.
“Three people suffered minor injuries after being assaulted after the damage was caused.
“Our investigation into these offences continues and we’re reviewing CCTV footage and carrying out forensic enquiries.
“If anyone has information on who was responsible, we’d encourage them to call 101 and give the call handler the reference number 5217004475.”
Read more at http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/village-hall-rocked-by-anti-fascist-gun-raid-against-meeting-of-far-right-nationalists/story-30106781-detail/story.html#j2cm82CjfhjqwCrM.99
She tells an unbelievable account of how Canadian authorities took her children away from her because of her pro-White views! This is an example of Canadian political correctness harming defenseless children… and the state tearing a family apart. Please speak out about this — a woman punished for her political views.
Const. Sonny Spina says it is not clear if the incident was directed at a particular person or group in the community.
Spina says a criminal investigator is following up with the complainant and people in the area.
Police have not identified the homeowner, but B’nai Brith Canada columnist Sara McCleary says the swastika and a word, which she believes to be a sexist slur, were drawn in the snow on her front yard last Saturday evening.
Spina says investigators have no suspects, but are asking anyone with information to come forward.
McCleary says she took a photo to show her husband, then brushed it away. Spina says the swastika was gone when police went to investigate, but says a photo was supplied by the complainant..”
So, let’s get this straight: Someone drew a swastika and the mysterious word “cloop” in a snowdrfit on a woman’s lawn. She took a photo of the artwork with her cellphone and then brushed out the evidence. So, where’s the crime? Nothing was damaged. So, it wasn’t even vandalism.
It seems that the police in the Sault have too much time on their hands. Maybe it’s time to save some money and cut staff.
Police say they’re investigating after a swastika was found in front of a woman’s home in Sault Ste. Marie, Ont.
longtime professor accused of espousing anti-Semitic views.
Anthony Hall was suspended without pay in October following comments he made in online articles and videos suggesting there was a Zionist connection to the 9/11 attacks and that the events of the Holocaust should be up for debate.”
Thus, it’s quite clear that Prof. Hall’s crime is suggesting an Israeli connection to 9/11 and saying that the so-called holocaust should be debatable. And shouldn’t it?
The Canadian Press report continues: “‘From the findings of that assessment, the board has decided to proceed with a complaint to the Alberta Human Rights Commission against Dr. Hall for publishing statements, alone and in collaboration with others, that could be considered hateful, contemptuous and discriminatory,’ it said in a statement Monday.” Shockingly, the university assails academic freedom and seeks to get a kangaroo court to do its dirty work.
Prof. Hall is receiving some academic support: “Hall said the complaint is a way for administration to manoeuvre around its collective agreement with faculty.
‘It represents an enormous effort to change the landscape of higher education in Canada,’ he said. ‘I was ripped form the classroom mid-term in October and my students were deprived of the course they chose and the professor they chose.’
Both the University of Lethbridge Faculty Association and the Canadian Association of University Teachers criticized Hall’s suspension before any official finding of wrongdoing.”
Not surprisingly, the League for Human Rights (but not free speech) of B’nai Brith, Professor Hall’s chief tormenter, whose complaints led to his present persecution, is delighted: “Amanda Hohmann with B’nai Brith Canada said she’s pleased with how the university has handled the situation and says the reinstatement of Hall’s pay isn’t a vindication. Hohmann said Hall’s appearance earlier this month on a radio show posted on Stormfront — a white nationalist website that describes itself as a “community of racial realists and idealists” — shows the complaint is not an assault on the institution of tenure, as Hall argues, but a defence of human rights.
‘Instead of being repentant or apologizing for his behaviour, he’s doubled down and he’s gone even further down the rabbit hole of anti-Semitism,’ said Hohmann.”
So, silencing Professor Hall is “defending human rights”?
the censors have gone mad!
One wonders whether the Knights of Columbus could get a university to fire a professor who took issue with Catholic doctrine? Didn’t think so!
Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION
Anthony Hall, a University of Lethbridge professor, co-hosts a weekly YouTube show called False Flag Weekly News. (B’nai Brith/YouTube)
Horror Story Mother’s Two Children Seized by the State Because of Her political Views: Brian Ruhe & Paul Fromm Interview Dara Graham.
Paul Fromm in Toronto and Brian Ruhe in Vancouver interview Dara Graham in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. She tells an unbelievable account of how Canadian authorities took her children away from her because of her pro-White views! This is an example of Canadian political correctness harming defenseless children… and the state tearing a family
apart. Please speak out about this! A woman punished for her political views.
To gauge the pulse of public opinion, look at the comments after news stories in the online editions of newspapers or radio/television news. The level of anger at Canada’s Europeans-replacing immigration policy, the endless coddling of minorities and other issues hardly ever appears in news stories or commentary. As in the U.S., there is a huge gap between approved opinion preached in most of the media and what a huge section of the population is thinking.
The dissident ideas have some of the guardians of approved opinion worried. They seek to cut off or strictly limit this venue for public opinion. Even the normally pro-free speech Globe and Mail is worried. Sylvia Stead its Public Editor. In an article “Online comments — is there a fix?” (Globe and Mail, July 30, 2016), she supported a crackdown: “But too many [comments] do go too far — becoming personal, racist and bordering on hate speech. The end result can be so toxic that several news outlets, including The Toronto Star, have simply dispensed with comments altogether.” The fear of “racist” comments invites the response, “So what?” “Racism” is such an open-ended term that it is used to silence criticism of immigration or minority pretensions. Donald Trump was roundly denounced by his opponent and the compliant press on both sides of the border as a “racist” and he’s now President of the United States.
Stead continues: “Editors around the world will tell you they have problems with the same subjects: immigration, the Middle East, Moslems, indigenous people, women’s rights and the LGBTQ community. … As part of its crackdown on dissent, the Globe “will exclude certain stories from comments — usually ones about legal matters, criminal trials and potential criminal charges. Also, comments on stories about a specific basket of topics that are known to attract hate must be approved by a moderator before the can appear. I would advocate tighter rules for certain topics such as race, immigration, religion, sexual identity, women’s rights, indigenous people — and that extra effort be made to protect minority groups (and women) from abuse. That would mean more screening and, as necessary, closing comments more often.”
Presumably, it’s still okay to abuse and criticize Christians and White people and you may still be allowed to have intemperate opinions about the weather!
republicbroadcasting.org