The Leaders’ Debates Commission published its final decision yesterday, and guess what: I’ve been excluded from the TV debates.
It was all rigged from the start of course.
We knew it when they changed the criteria from the 2021 election two months ago.
If you recall, on the basis of the previous criteria, I would automatically have been allowed to participate, since the PPC got 4.9% of the vote in the 2021 election, and one of the criteria was to have received at least 4% in the previous election.
But that criteria was removed and replaced with new ones that made my participation much less likely.
According to the Commission, the PPC does not have enough support in the polls to justify inviting me.
Frederick, populist parties and politicians everywhere are being deliberately targeted and excluded by the globalist establishment.
This week, the French populist leader Marine Le Pen, who is favourite to beat Macron in the coming election, was barred from running on dubious fraud charges.
In the US, the establishment did everything they could to keep Trump away from the White House, including try to kill him.
In Romania, a populist presidential candidate was also barred from running a few weeks ago.
In Germany, the second largest party in last month’s elections, the populist AfD, is being unfairly shunned by all the others.
And here in Canada, they rigged the rules to exclude me from the debates and deprive the PPC’s 840,000 voters of a voice.
It’s more important than ever that we reach voters through podcasts and social media, instead of relying on the legacy media.
As I tour the country, I continue to do 2 or 3 podcast interviews every day, in addition to my daily press conference and events with local supporters.
And our social media team are flooding the web with memes, clips, and posts about our bold platform.
That’s how the People’s Party communicates with the people in a populist
I just got out of what appears to be my last hearing in Practice Court for this seemingly never ending “hate crime” trial. To give some history for those who may not know. In 2016 I applied to march in the Toronto Homosexual Pride parade as an openly Christian man and desired to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ with the participants.
This parade after all is funded by three levels of government (you and I pay for it) and it is supposed to be “inclusive.” In fact two of Pride Toronto’s “values” as stated on the front page of their website is “Diversity” and “Inclusion.” What could be more diverse than an open Christian sharing the Gospel with Toronto pride participants right in their parade?
And yes, Christians should go and share the Gospel at the Toronto Homosexual Pride parade and everywhere else where lost souls can be found.
“Go into all the world and proclaim the Gospel to the whole creation.” Mark 16:15
Sadly, notwithstanding the parade’s alleged commitment to “inclusion” and “diversity,” the parade was not accepting of Bible believing Christians like me, so I had to apply as a Gay Zombie Cannabis Consumer to get in.
“To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ) that I might win those outside the law. To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. I do it all for the sake of the Gospel, that I may share with them in its blessings.” 1 Corinthians 9:21-23
Bill Whatcott (rainbow tutu) and his crack Christian commandos were accepted by the Toronto Homosexual Pride parade in 2016, once they self identified as the Gay Zombies Cannabis Consumers Association.
Anyways, once we got into the parade, we proceeded to deliver 3000 “Zombie Safe Sex” packages to the parade participants. I am no longer able to show you the Gospel flyer contained in the “Zombie Safe Sex” package, as the Ontario Attorney General is alleging the flyer is a “hate crime.” Mass Resistance decided to put the flyer up on their website in the United States where free speech enjoys greater protection. You can see my flyer there if you are so inclined and decide for yourself if it is criminal hate speech. The flyer contained the Gospel of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ, criticism of Justin Trudeau and the Liberal Party’s homosexual activism, a testimony of a former transvestite who regained his manhood, as well as warnings about the health risks related to homosexual behaviour.
Here is one example of what the Ontario Attorney General is alleging to be criminal activity. Not the two naked sodomites with their wangs hanging out. Rather the “zombie safe sex” package that my brave activist handed to one of the sodomites and that he is clearly fascinated with. My activist is not use to being in parades with naked dudes and she appears to be trying to look dignified as the sodomite fumbles with his “zombie safe sex” package and chatters away to her.
Anyways, by all accounts our crack Christian commando Gospel infiltration of the Toronto homosexual pride parade was a smashing success. We got out all 3,000 “Zombie Safe Sex” packages containing valuable Gospel and health information for lost homosexuals.
On the way out I also got a photo op with Mr. Leatherman Toronto.
The 2016 Toronto homosexual pride parade was a somewhat spiritual event, but not very sensitive to the feelings of Christians. Note the sodomite on the left who decided to march with an image of our Lord on his crotch.
Homosexual Activist Lawyer Doug Elliott (left) and Ontario Deputy Premier George Smitherman (right) announce a $104 million class action lawsuit against Bill Whatcott in the Parliament Hill press gallery.
Notwithstanding, disrespectful displays and signs mocking Christians being allowed at the Toronto Pride Parade year after year, and notwithstanding homosexual activists crashing and cancelling Christian events when it suits them; it seems the homosexual activists are a vindictive and humourless bunch, and not really inclined to embrace the concept of free speech when a Christian pulls one over on them.
Within days of Pride Toronto realizing I utilized their taxpayer funded parade to spead the Gospel and accurate health information on the risks of the homosexual lifestyle while disguised as a gay zombie, homosexual activist lawyer Doug Elliott, with the Deputy Premier of Ontario and a gaggle of homosexual activists decended on Parliament Hill in Ottawa to announce a $104 million class action lawsuit against me and anyone connected with me. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Premier Kathleen Wynne, the Liberal Party, as well as all the parade participants, were named as “victims” in the class action lawsuit.
After threatening me with jail if I didn’t give up the names of my helpers and wasting a pile of time and money for two years trying to extract blood out of a stone, the homosexual activists decided to drop their lawsuit as I wasn’t speaking and I didn’t have any money to give them. The homosexual activists/Ontario government opted to go after me in 2018 by issuing a Canada Wide Arrest Warrant, charging me with “Wilful Promotion of Hatred.” At the time the Attorney General was seeking 18 months in prison upon conviction.
I turned myself in, spent a few days in jail, and was flown to Ontario, where I went on trial and was eventually found “Not Guilty.”
I thought that was the end of the matter, but the Ontario Attorney General actually appealed my acquittal and The Ontario Court of Appeal ordered me to go on trial again! My side appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada to reverse the Court of Appeal’s decision but they refused to hear my case.
I was put on bail again, and had to linger in Ontario for a few months unemployed, going to court, and applying for legal aid as my legal fees for this next trial will be as expensive as the last trial ($100,000 or so). Over the years I was able to raise tens of housands of dollars for my lawyers, but barring a miracle there is no way I could afford a lawyer for this trial.
The Attorney General argued and the Ontario Court of Appeal agreed that a second trial is needed to consider my “historical discredible conduct.”
Bill Whatcott (pink hair, short shorts, wearing a t-shirt that reads “The Flying Spaghetti Monster is Gay” gets a hug from the organizer of the Vancouver Pride parade in 2014, after delivering 2500 “Gospel Condoms” (no condom all Gospel) to Vancouver Pride participants.
The above is an example of what the Attorney General thinks is “discredible conduct” that I engaged in “historically.” Bringing up these past missionary endeavours and flyers that go back as far as 25 years and actually have nothing to do with the 2016 Toronto Pride parade flyer, is supposed to help make the case I am a hate criminal and my latest Gospel flyer is criminal hate speech.
The Ontario Court of Appeal also decided the first trial judge erred by declining to admit Nick Mule’ (the guy in the video video below) as an “expert.” Mr. Mule’ was paid a pile of taxpayer’s money to write an “expert” paper that was supposed to help the court understand that I committed “microagressions” against the parade participants and that my flyer was going to cause “minority stress” and lead to bad health outcomes, if I was not criminally convicted and stopped.
Full disclosure, I only listened for a few minutes and skipped to a few random parts of this guy’s lecture. If one does as I do, they will realize very quickly Mr. Mule’s “expertise” is on all things homosexual, and no doubt he would want me in jail for my flyer. But really, why is Nick Mule’s opinion more relevant than Joe the welder’s opinion on my flyer?
Anyways, on Monday, August 12, I learned my new trial dates and the dates I need to travel to Ontario and be in court again.
I will be in person in the Ontario Superior Court in Toronto for the week of June 23-27, 2025. If any friends wish to join me in court this week, I would be grateful. My legal team will be arguing I should have a right to a jury trial, as the Prosecutor is still arguing for substantial jail time (6 months to one year) and I will have a criminal record showing an indictable offense if I am convicted.
I will be in the Ontario Superior Court in Toronto for the week of October 27-31, 2025. My friends are welcome to attend this hearing also. My defense team will be arguing against the Attorney General’s attempt to introduce my past flyers and missionary work as evidence of “discredible conduct” that is relevant to my new trial.
Finally, my trial will commence the week of March 2, 2026 and is expected to last two weeks. The trial will take place in the Ontario Superior Court in Toronto and of course I am required to attend in person. The trial is open to the public and my friends are welcome to attend.
This One Simply Will Not Survive A Constitutional Challenge
Meanwhile the BC Human wRongs tribunal gets payed to put people through the meatgrinder of Court
…………………………………………. BC Civil wRongs tribunal latest outrage ABBOTSFORD, BC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that the BC Human Rights Tribunal is being challenged before the BC Supreme Court for imposing a $10,000 penalty on private speech. In January 2025, the Tribunal fined British Columbian Kirstin Olsen $10,000 for privately expressing concerns about her friend’s decision. Her petition against the Tribunal was filed in the BC Supreme Court on March 21, 2025.
Kirstin Olsen and Theresa (Terry) Wiebe had been close friends for several years. Wiebe identifies as transgender. From 2014 to 2018, Olsen allowed Wiebe to move a motorhome onto her property and live there. In 2017, Wiebe informed Olsen that she had begun hormone therapy and was planning to have a mastectomy. Wiebe asked Olsen if the surgery would impact their arrangement, but Olsen declined to give an answer. Based on concerns about her own mother’s breast cancer and mastectomy and the complications that could arise from such a surgery, Olsen told Wiebe that she was uncomfortable with Weibe getting a mastectomy and that she did not support the decision. Olsen and Wiebe continued to be on friendly terms, and Olsen continued to allow Wiebe to live on her property for $200 per month. Olsen even paid for Wiebe to return to BC from the Yukon after Wiebe had been hospitalized due to what appeared at the time to be a complication from hormone therapy. After Wiebe had gotten into a number of arguments with other people on Olsen’s property, however, Olsen asked Wiebe to leave in 2018. Olsen’s reasons for asking Wiebe to leave had nothing to do with Wiebe’s transition. Soon after, Wiebe filed a discrimination complaint against Olsen with the BC Human Rights Tribunal. In January 2025, the Tribunal released its decision.
While the Tribunal found that the eviction was not related to Wiebe’s transgender identity, the Tribunal decided that Olsen’s comments expressing concern about the decision to get a mastectomy were discriminatory. For “injury to dignity,” the Tribunal ordered Olsen to pay Wiebe $10,000 . Nowhere in the decision did the Tribunal consider the impact of the fine on Olsen’s freedom of expression – protected by section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In her petition to the Court, Olsen also points out that her comments were not directed in any way toward Wiebe’s gender identity. On the contrary, Wiebe and Olsen had remained on friendly terms even while Wiebe had undergone a gender identity transition and hormone treatments. “It is very concerning to see a government tribunal policing private communications between friends, and imposing a $10,000 penalty, without giving any heed to the fact that Canada’s Charter guarantees freedom of expression,” stated constitutional lawyer Marty Moore. “A comment of concern for a friend is very different than evicting someone from their home on the basis of their race, religion, sex or other protected personal characteristic. The BC Human Rights Tribunal should focus on combatting genuine cases of discrimination rather than policing speech.”
The US has condemned the prison sentence handed to veteran French conservative politician Marine Le Pen, who was found guilty of embezzlement and banned from running for president.
On Monday, a Paris court ordered Le Pen, the former head of the National Rally (RN) party, to serve four years in prison, of which two will be suspended, and banned her from holding office for five years. If not overturned, the verdict would effectively bar her from the 2027 presidential election.
The prosecution accused Le Pen of misusing the EU funds intended to pay for her aides when she was a member of the European Parliament. According to the newspaper Le Monde, the prosecutors argued in court that Le Pen and other RN politicians diverted the money to pay for the party’s activities in France. Le Pen has described the verdict as politically motivated and promised to launch an appeal.
US State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce drew parallels between the case in France and the criminal prosecution of President Donald Trump under the Biden administration.
“Exclusion of people from the political process is particularly concerning, given the aggressive and corrupt lawfare waged against President Trump here in the United States. We support the right of everyone to offer their views in the public square, agree or disagree,” she added.
Bruce noted that, in his speech at the Munich Security Conference in February, Vice President J.D. Vance criticized Germany and other American allies in Europe for what he argued were attempts to restrict political competition. “Democracy rests on the sacred principle that the voice of the people matters. There is no room for firewalls. You either uphold the principle or you don’t,” Vance said.
RN President Jordan Bardella has accused the authorities of seeking to eliminate Le Pen from the 2027 election. “They are depriving millions of voters of their choice and therefore of their freedom,” he said.
Le Pen ran for president three times, placing second in 2017 and 2022
Yesterday, 25 March, was the holy day formally called The Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary and commonly referred to as Lady Day. It commemorates the day that the angel Gabriel appeared to the Virgin Mary in Nazareth and told her that she was “blessed… among women” and “hast found favour with God” and would conceive and give birth to the Christ, the Son of God. The account can be found in St. Luke’s Gospel, the first chapter, verses 36-38. St. Luke does not provide the calendar date on which Gabriel visited the Blessed Virgin but he does say that it was in the “sixth month” (v. 26), i.e., of Elizabeth’s pregnancy with John the Baptist. Elizabeth conceived shortly after her husband Zacharias had received his visitation from Gabriel while serving in the Temple. Zacharias was of the “course of Abia” the Temple service of which occurred twice in the year, once in the week of the Day of Atonement. That this was the week in which the visitation took place can be inferred from indicators in the text that the Temple was very well attended that day. Also, there is an ancient legend that Zacharias was serving as High Priest on Yom Kippur that is difficult to reconcile with St. Luke’s account but can be explained as an embellishment on the correct detail of it having been Yom Kippur or at least the week thereof that the event took place. Yom Kippur falls in late September to early October, making October the month of John the Baptist’s conception, and March therefore, the sixth month of it. Although the earliest mention of the celebration of the Annunciation goes only back to the sixth century, the fact that the Church regarded it as having occurred on 25 March since the earliest centuries is easily demonstrated. St. Hippolytus of Rome, whose years were 170 to 235 AD, wrote that our Lord was born eight days before the Kalends of January.[1] That is 25 December by our way of reckoning dates.[2] Nine months to the day after 25 March.
There is a type of Protestant who thinks that any amount of honour and attention bestowed on our Lord’s mother takes away from that which is due to Christ Himself. The Annunciation, the Gospel account of it, and its celebration reveal the foolishness of this way of thinking.
Consider the salutation of Gabriel to the Virgin: “Hail, thou that art highly favoured, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.” (Lk. 1:28)
The first observation to be made about these words is that the honour bestowed upon Mary here, that she is “highly favoured” or as William Tyndale rendered it “full of grace”, the Lord is with her, and she is “blessed…among women” come from the mouth of an unfallen angel speaking on behalf of God. It could hardly, therefore, detract from the honour due to her Son.
The second observation is that this is the first three lines of the Ave Maria. These are drawn directly from the inspired words of Scripture. The next two lines of the Ave Maria, are Elizabeth’s salutation when Mary visits her immediately after the Annunciation (Lk. 1:42). The only things added to the Scriptural text in the Ave Maria prior to the Sancta Maria portion are the names Mary and Jesus. Remember that the next time you hear someone claim these words are idolatrous.
Now consider the Christological significance of the Annunciation. Objections to honouring Mary often contribute to poor Christology. Some Hyper-Protestants, in their zeal to throw out anything they consider to be tainted with “papist Mariolatry”, object to the title “Mother of God” or “Theotokos” and in doing so embrace the sort of thinking associated with the fifth century Nestorius of Constantinople that was condemned as heretical at the third ecumenical council. Ironically, of course, Nestorius himself had no problem with honouring Mary. His problem with “Theotokos” was that he thought it suggested that Mary was the source of Jesus’ divinity. This is the same problem Hyper-Protestants have with “Mother of God.” “Mary is not the Mother of God” they will say “She is the Mother of Jesus” just as the fifth century Nestorians called Mary the “Christokos” (Christ-bearer) rather than “Theotokos” (God-bearer). The reason these arguments are condemned as heretical is because they introduce division into the Person of Christ. Jesus Christ is One Person. Mary is the Mother of that Person. That Person is both God and Man. Therefore Mary is the Mother of God. This obviously does not mean that Jesus gets His deity from her. The Person Jesus has always existed with and in His Father and the Holy Spirit as God. That Person became Man but was always God. In becoming Man, He gained a Mother. This is a completely unique instance of a Person existing before His Mother, but that does not alter the fact that she is His Mother, or that Mother is her relationship to Him as a Person, and since He that Person is God as well as Man, she is the Mother of God.
Now before you conclude that I have gotten away from my main point think of this question: When did the Incarnation take place? When was the Hypostatic Union formed? When did the Eternally-Begotten Son of God add a complete but anhypostatic[3] human nature, subject to the consequences of the Fall such as mortality except for the taint of sin itself, to His Own Eternal Person and become Man?
The answer, of course, is Lady Day, the day of the Annunciation. The Incarnation did not take place at Christ’s birth on Christmas. By that time His human life had already been growing for nine months. Jesus’ humanity was never not-united to His deity and His Person but was created already in union with Him. Otherwise His humanity would not have been His but someone else’s that He took in a manner similar to possession. The Incarnation, therefore, and Jesus’ conception are one and the same event. Gabriel’s message to the Blessed Virgin was:
Fear not, Mary: for thou hast found favour with God. And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS. He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end. (Lk. 1:30-33).
After inquiring as to how this was possible and receiving the answer that it would be by the power of the Holy Spirit, her response was “Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word.” (Lk. 1:38) In these words she in submissive obedience consented to being the God-bearer and the miracle was accomplished.
Mary’s response was a significant theme in the writings of the earliest Church Fathers. St. Irenaeus wrote:
In accordance with this design, Mary the Virgin is found obedient, saying, Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to your word. Luke 1:38 But Eve was disobedient; for she did not obey when as yet she was a virgin. And even as she, having indeed a husband, Adam, but being nevertheless as yet a virgin… having become disobedient, was made the cause of death, both to herself and to the entire human race; so also did Mary, having a man betrothed [to her], and being nevertheless a virgin, by yielding obedience, become the cause of salvation, both to herself and the whole human race…And thus also it was that the knot of Eve’s disobedience was loosed by the obedience of Mary. For what the virgin Eve had bound fast through unbelief, this did the virgin Mary set free through faith.[4]
This same comparison had earlier been made by Justin Martyr.[5]
While the Hyper-Protestants may rage against this comparison and find in it evidence that “Romanism” had begun to creep into the Church as early as the second century it rests upon Scriptural authority. Mary and Eve are joined in the first and the last books of the Bible.
In the curse on the serpent in Geneses 3:15 reads “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.” Who is the woman in this verse?
On the one hand it is obviously Eve. She was the only woman present at the time. On the other hand it has to be Mary because it was Mary who gave birth to Christ, the seed that crushed the head of the serpent even as he bruised His heel on the Cross. So which is it? Clearly both.
Turning to the final book of the Bible, we find in the twelfth chapter of Revelation a woman spoken of again, this time at great length. She is never named but is just called the woman. She has an enemy, however, who is “a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads.” (Rev. 12:3) In the chapter he has an army of angels and fights against St. Michael the Archangel and his angels. St. Michael is victorious and the dragon and his angels are cast out of heaven. When this happens the dragon is identified as “that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world.” (Rev. 12:9) The same serpent upon whom the curse was pronounced in Genesis 3. Here he is shown, just as Genesis says, to be the enemy of the woman, making war on her and her seed. For the woman “being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered” (Rev. 12:2) and the dragon “stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born.” (Rev. 12:4). Here is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis. To make clear that the child is Jesus Christ the next verse reads “And she brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron: and her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne.”
Since she gives birth to Jesus Christ, this woman is clearly the Blessed Virgin Mary. As in Genesis 3:15, however, she is also Eve, because it is here in Revelation that the conflict between the woman and the serpent begun in Genesis 3 comes to its final close. This is Mary as the New Eve. Eve, of course, was the wife of Adam, whereas Mary the New Eve is the Mother of Jesus Christ, the New Adam. Note however the first and the last verses of the chapter. In the first she is clothed with the sun, stands on the moon, and has a crown of twelve stars. This alludes to the visions of Joseph in the book of Genesis. The final verse speaks of the dragon making war on the “remnant of her seed” who “keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.” Mary, the New Eve, is not merely Mary as an individual, but Mary as representative of the people of God. The sun, moon, and stars are the symbols of Israel. It is the Church that has the testimony of Jesus Christ. The Church, according to St. Paul in Romans, is the “olive tree” of Israel, with some branches removed for unbelief, and “wild” branches (Gentile believers) grafted in. The Church is described as the bride of Christ of the New Testament. Mary is literally the Mother of Jesus Christ, but as the New Eve she figuratively represents the collective that is the bride of Christ.[6]
The early Fathers clearly had strong Scriptural support for their teaching that the Blessed Virgin was the New Eve, whose obedience played such an integral role in the restoration of that which had fell into ruin through the disobedience of the first Eve. Perhaps we should pay more attention to their interpretation of the Scriptures and less to those whose determination to honour only Christ has become an obsession that would condemn even the Protestant Reformers[7] for honouring her with the honour that the Scriptures give her.
We beseech thee, O Lord, pour thy grace into our hearts; that, as we have known the incarnation of thy Son Jesus Christ by the message of an angel, so by his cross and passion we may be brought unto the glory of his resurrection; through the same Jesus Christ our Lord. Amen.[8]
[1] St. Hippolytus of Rome, Commentary on Daniel, 4.23.3.
[2] The Romans reckoned backwards from the Kalends of the next month, we reckon forwards from that of the current month.
[3] Without personal identity distinct from the Eternal Personhood of the Son of God. Since Jesus’ human nature was created already united to His Eternal Person it never actually existed in a state of anhypostasia. The term that denotes the actual state of Jesus’ human nature as it has existed from the moment of its creation in union with His deity in His Eternal Person is “enhypostatic.” “Enhypostatic”, “in the person”, is the only state in which Jesus’ human nature has ever actually existed since it was created already in union with His Person. Since “enhypostatic” describes the human nature as united with the divine in Christ, “anhypostatic”, “without person”, is used to speak of the human nature by itself in contexts where it would be difficult to make sense without speaking as if His human nature had existence by itself prior to the Hypostatic Union. The importance of these distinctions and this highly specialized, even for theology, terminology, is their usefulness in avoiding the error of Apollonaris, who taught that Jesus’ human nature was lacking a component which His divine nature made up for (the Logos, he taught, took the place of a human nous or mind), the error of thinking of the Incarnation as either a sort of possession or a fusion of two persons, one divine one human, into one, or the error of thinking of Jesus’ Person as a composition formed by the union of the divine and human natures. In the Incarnation an Eternal Person added a second, created nature to His eternal nature and that second nature was created as His and never belonged to any other person distinct from His Eternal Person. See Eric Mascall, Christ, the Christian and The Church: A Study of the Incarnation and its Consequences (Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 2017).
[4] St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies, translated by Alexander Roberts and William Rambaut in Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 1, edited by Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe, III.22.4.
[6] Note that the imagery of Rev. 12:1 is also that of a queen. The woman is seen in heaven wearing a crown of stars. The queen of heaven. It is significant to observe that in the books of Kings, the queens are consistently mentioned, unless they figure into the narrative in some other way, as the mothers of their sons rather than the wives of their husbands. The queen mother rather than the queen consort was the more prominent idea of the queen in the Old Testament. Here, and not in the worship of Astarte condemned by Jeremiah, we find the origin of the Regina Coeli title for Mary. Let the Hyper-Protestants fume all they like, it will not change the fact.
[7] The Protestant Reformers, at least the Magisterial Reformers, especially the English and Lutheran, but not excluding the Swiss, all had a Mariology that would be considered way too High by many contemporary Protestants.
[8] Collect for the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin, Book of Common Prayer. —Gerry T. Neal
“Promoting Freedom in B.C.” Freedom activists are critical thinkers! Our society is so dumbed down and indoctrinated that anyone who is a critical thinker is labeled as a Conspiracy Theorist to avoid critical debates Did you know: The term ‘conspiracy theorist’ was first coined and used by the CIA to ridicule anyone who opposed the
It is important to come out on Saturdays to oppose all Gov’t corruption and support others. Visibility = Credibility. Next rally is: Saturday March 22, 2025 Hwy 97 & Cooper Help us give away hundreds of Druthers every week to supporting drivers! April 5, 2025 Stuart Park!!
Courts Falsified assault charge Kelowna Courthouse R v David Lindsay s. 266 Criminal Code Assault – Appeal Thank you for all your support and belief for freedom!! Remember the Freedom Principle: An attack against one is an attack against all.
An attack against all, is an attack against one.
Next Supreme Court Appeal Hearing Date: April 9, 2025 9:00 a.m. I have previously appeared before Justice Wilson, for a case management hearing to determine how my appeal itself, will proceed. I have now filed a Constitutional Challenge to the transcripts fees statutes and regulations, including the basis for same, and relief I will be seeking. An amendment may have to be made to include a statute I was unaware of. I will post this on our website when it is complete, along with the response from Jessica Patrick for the Attorney General in Victoria, who will be dealing with this matter. A date has been set for the week of August 11, 2025 to hear this matter. Two affidavits will be filed by February 28, 2025. The Crown recently filed its response to my Challenge on the Transcripts Extortion Fees they are charging for appeals. Apparently, there has been a new change in the contract for transcripts fees. Previously, the company with the contract had exclusively rights to make these transcripts. The Crown alleges that this provision has now been removed, and I can get anyone, as long as they are registered with the Gov’t to produce them, to make my Transcripts. This is a bit too late however, as I needed this in October, 2023, not now. I am trying to do these myself and have them accepted by the Court to avoid fundraising, however, this has proven to be extremely time consuming. I have about another three days to transcribe, and then have to ask the Court to accept them. The Crown has acknowledged that if the Court accepts my own Transcripts, that my Challenge will be moot and not required to
be heard.
Monday, April 14, 2025 10:00 a.m. To continue hearing my application to have the probation order stayed pending appeal. Justice Wilson will be hearing my appeal. Anyone who was in court or seen the videos played into evidence, knows full well I am innocent. That Crown Persecutor Grabavac would devote so much time and effort into this relatively minor issue, shows the politics underscoring this case. Grabavac, as expected, did not finish his presentation of lies and
deception to the Court at our last hearing.
City of Kelowna v David Lindsay et al Petition to Stop Rallies at Stuart Park Court Adjourned – August 25, 2025 IMPORTANT LEGAL UPDATE – FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION CASE Dear Supporters, We want to provide you with a critical update regarding our legal battle for freedom of expression. Our three-day hearing, originally scheduled for the week of March 10, 2025, has been adjourned once again, likely until this summer. This marks the second postponement, entirely due to scheduling conflicts in the Supreme Court, as a criminal trial has been given precedence over our civil proceedings—just as it was in December. While we do not yet have a confirmed date for the hearing, we have been asked to indicate our availability for late July, August, or September 2025. We will keep you informed the moment a new date is set. The City’s Legal Attack on Freedom of Expression This case began when the City of Kelowna filed a Petition seeking an injunction to shut down our rallies and ban us from key downtown areas—the most effective locations for public demonstrations. In response, we filed a comprehensive legal defense, including our Response, supporting affidavits, and a SLAPP Application to strike down the City’s injunction. This move completely blindsided the City, which had not anticipated such a strong legal counteraction Our documents in this case are located on our website at: https://clearbc.org/david/ City of Kelowna documents and pleadings are now placed on our website for public viewing: https://clearbc.org/city-of-kelowna/ What Is a SLAPP Application? https://www.bclaws.gov.bc.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg /19003 A SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) Application is a legal mechanism designed to prevent powerful entities from silencing public expression through litigation. In this case, the City—armed with virtually unlimited taxpayer-funded resources—is attempting to suppress our fundamental right to peaceful, public protest. This is precisely the type of government overreach that SLAPP legislation was enacted to prevent. The City’s Dangerous Argument The City of Kelowna’s position represents one of the most dangerous attacks on free expression in Canada. Their argument is that without a permit to use sound equipment, our protest is not truly a protest—it is merely a silent gathering, or event as they falsely term it. This logic undermines the very foundation of free expression. Requiring a permit for protest implies that protesting is banned by default, unless explicitly approved by the government. However, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has repeatedly ruled that freedom of expression includes not just the right to speak—but the right to be heard. To illustrate this, we played a video of David speaking at our Freedom Rally when our generator went out—immediately, people could no longer hear his words. This proves what we all know: effective public expression requires the ability to communicate clearly, which includes, indeed, requires the use of sound equipment. Furthermore, both the SCC and lower courts have consistently upheld that public parks, streets, and sidewalks are Constitutionally protected places for peaceful protest. Even the RCMP has acknowledged that our demonstrations have been entirely peaceful. City’s Flawed & Misleading Claims The City argues that our demonstrations qualify as an “event,” which under their bylaws requires a permit. However, the term “event” is not even defined in their bylaws. Their position is based solely on:
Our use of sound equipment
The presence of our CLEAR canopy, which they have falsely labeled as a tent
Allegations that CLEAR and David were selling merchandise These weak and arbitrary claims do not—and cannot—turn a lawful protest into a licenced “event.” Even if certain bylaw infractions were alleged, that does not justify stripping us of our Constitutional rights. Additionally, the City has provided no evidence that David or CLEAR were selling anything. Only that other people were. And I have not been deputized by the City to enforce their bylaws, as former Bylaw Manager Kevin Mead admitted. Not to prejudge, but the Justice in this case, I believe has already recognized that the City is going no where with their claim that our CLEAR Canopy is an alleged, “tent”. In effect, the only thing the City really has in evidence that we were allegedly holding an undefined “event”, is that we used sound equipment and advertised our Freedom Rallies. All protests involve advertising or they would never take place. This is an absurd, and indeed, stupid argument. The use of sound equipment is what is legally known as “necessarily incidental” to our freedom of expression. Without the sound equipment, we could not effectively communicate, and at times with many people, not at all. By doing this, the rallies become more of a social function, than a protest, because no one can effectively communicate to everyone else. Our SLAPP Application: A Strong Legal Defense Our SLAPP Application is incredibly detailed and well-prepared. As the legal maxims state: “Fraud lurks in generalities”, and, “the details make all the difference.” The City’s strategy is clear:
Ignore Constitutional law and attempt to redefine protesting as a regulated activity.
Gloss over key legal principles and hope the courts accept their broad, unfounded claims.
Bylaw us out of existence—forcing us away from public spaces and out of the public eye. But we refuse to be silenced. We knew we had to be meticulously prepared, with extensive evidence and legal arguments to counter every false claim. And we are prepared. The Broader War on Free Speech This case is not an isolated attack—it is part of a coordinated effort to suppress free expression across Canada, particularly in British Columbia and Alberta.
Online censorship is expanding.
Private interest groups, funded by the government, are targeting businesses that support free speech, threatening them with boycotts and false accusations. Many businesses break contracts with us at the last minute out of fear.
Municipal governments are being weaponized to push freedom advocates out of public spaces.
And most recently under the Communist Liberal Government, ongoing refusals to permit certain media outlets into their press releases and government functions, to ensure only Liberal Government supported media is allowed in. Their tactic is simple: Out of sight, out of mind. If they can erase us and our messages from public view, they believe they can stifle dissent. Why This Fight Matters Our Kelowna public rallies have empowered thousands to get involved in defending freedom. The truth we have exposed has reached all corners of British Columbia, shedding light on the deceptions of government officials. Just in the past six weeks:
Three complete strangers have approached me, expressing their gratitude for what we have done.
One person emphatically stated, “There are thousands of people supporting you.”
A public health employee confided that many of their colleagues supported us but were too afraid to speak out. These silent supporters will only be able to stand with us if we remain in the public eye. Requiring a government license to protest is unacceptable. If we comply, we further surrender our right to spontaneous demonstrations, which are at the heart of effective activism.
How You Can Help This is one of the most important free expression cases in Canada. Only three provinces have SLAPP legislation similar to what we have in British Columbia. We need your continued support—legal battles like this require time, effort, and resources. If you believe in freedom of expression, there are three ways you can help: time, energy or financial. Please choose at least one to contribute to our case and our Freedom Rallies.
Next Steps: Stay Engaged As soon as the courts provide us with new hearing dates, we will notify you immediately. Please show up at court and voice your support of our position In the meantime, spread the word, stay informed, and stand with us. The fight for freedom of expression is far from over—but together, we will prevail. The BC Government will use this case, via its municipalities, to eventually shut down all public protests, if we lose. Make no mistake, despite the City’s colourable guise of claiming it is only bylaw enforcement and they don’t care what we talk about, this is an outright lie. The only person charged with having public rallies is David – despite dozens of other protests using sound equipment over the years on other topics that either supported the governments or were non-threatening to them. CLEARLY, our rallies have had far more success behind the scenes, than we can see. Our signs, some of the best, including LOCK HER UP – Bonnie Henry, remain some of the strongest signs voicing not only our opposition to what these Government people have done, but demanding accountability.
Thank you for your unwavering support.
Tamara Lich and Chris Barber decision expected next month
Dr. Trozzi and Ted Kuntz Wins of the Week – #64 https://www.drtrozzi.news/p/wins-of-the-week-ep64-with-ted- kuntz?publication_id=1972999&post_id=159154153&isFreemail=tr ue&r=1ri3is&triedRedirect=true&utm_source=substack&utm_medi
um=email
Action4Canada Next Empower Hour: March 19, 2025 Next Empower Hour: Michelle Stirling Topic: Native Pawns – Cheque Mate Sign on starts at: 4:30pm PST/7:30pm EST Be sure to Register in Advance and invite others. Join us! Share this page and link with your friends and social media! This week on the Empower Hour Michelle Stirling, author, researcher, columnist and blogger, joins Tanya Gaw to further expose the native activists and government proxies who are fraudulently using the so-called Truth and Reconciliation as a pretext to justify a massive wealth transfer, land grabs and to steal our natural resources. This is in accordance with the global elites’ lust for power and money, and the World Economic Forum’s (WEFs) plan to rob every citizen of their belongings. As Klaus Schwab so infamously put it, “you’ll own nothing and be happy“. The media and global government operatives are using textbook, military style psychological warfare to achieve their goal as they attempt to deceive citizens into believing that European Canadians are evil, white colonialists who stole the land from the Indians and murdered thousands of innocent children and that the price we must all pay is to repent and be forced to make never-ending reparations for past sins, by relinquishing our hard-earned tax dollars and property. Michelle Stirling’s extensive research is exposing the lies and providing facts and insights into what is really going on. You will not want to miss this Empower Hour so be sure to sign up in advance and invite others. Are you finding it hard to make ends meet and frustrated with the Liberal government pandering to minority groups, whilst victimizing them and giving BILLIONS of your hard-earned tax dollars to opportunists and extortionists? Make no mistake, what we are witnessing is criminal and it must be stopped. In order for this to happen Canadians need to stop apologizing, educate themselves and make this a key election issue. Hundreds of billions of dollars have been paid out to date for Indian land claims and claims of mistreatment at Residential Schools resulting in a so-called genocide, based on fallacious accusations by Indian activists that children were missing or murdered and placed in mass graves. The problem is that there are no historical records or police reports of parents frantically searching for their missing children. However, there are well-documented and extensive records that prove the opposite. In fact, most of the deceased in the community graveyards (like Cowessess) are local pioneer families – generally, children who died AT an Indian Residential School (423 deaths at 139 schools over 113 years) were sent home for burial ON RESERVE! Michelle Stirling and other researchers have provided copious amounts of evidence to counter the lies regarding land rights and to show that the majority of schools were a safe haven for the majority of children, including the many orphans who would have otherwise been left to fend for themselves. Many Indians have also provided personal testimonies saying how grateful they were to have received an education, medical care and nutritious meals. But you won’t hear about any of this being reported by the mainstream media. The truth is that the Indians are being used as pawns in order to advance the Global Agenda and if we truly care about them, we will boldly speak out and work towards all Canadians being treated equally, in accordance with the Constitution. Examples of current land grabs and fraud:
February 1, 2025: BC Premier David Eby is working on moving forward on transferring the power over Crown Land to the natives. Which is 95% of BCs land.
Jan 27, 2025: Millions in federal funds to recover suspected Indian children’s graves in BC went elsewhere. Question: Should there be an investigation into this fraud and those that were involved, charged?
January 24,2025: Land-transfer finalized in agreement between Mission, province, First Nations
February 5, 2025: New Brunswick Aboriginal title has become a constitutional threat in Canada • This global campaign is an existential threat to Canada’s sovereignty. Make this an election issue. Share the following report with the elected officials in your area and request they respond. The Canadian Systemic Racism Ruse: Truth and Revelation. Remember the Freedom Principle: An attack against one is an attack against all.
An attack against all, is an attack against one.
Guidelines for Peaceful Protesting/Gathering/Rallies and/or Attending Events (eg. Council Meetings, School Boards, Handing out Flyers) https://action4canada.com/know-your-rights-guidelines Check out A4C for some of the most successful actions and strategies available to us! And a big thank you to Tanya for all her hard work and dedication and support for the Christian principles that founded our nation!
https://action4canada.com/
See recent National Citizens Inquiry Presentations in Edmonton: https://rumble.com/user/ncicanada https://rumble.com/v6qdxy8-theo-fleury-from-despair-to-hope-a- story-of-survival.html?e9s=src_v1_upp https://rumble.com/v6q5c1c-an-injection-of-truth-2-dr.-david-e.- marin-from-01d.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp https://rumble.com/v6q4i8w-an-injection-of-truth-2-dr.-gary-
davidson-from-01d.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
https://bcrising.ca/hpoa/ Recently, Katie and her family obtained an injunction in the Federal Court against the cull of these wonderful animals. A judicial review of the Canadian Inspection Agency’s decision to cull these animals will now take place at some future date. Meanwhile, the Inspection agency has applied to have this hearing expedited. The Judge has decided to make a ruling based on written submissions only, so there will be no open court hearing on this issue. This is likely either this week or next week. An appeal has apparently been filed in the Federal Court of Appeal.
Please keep the support ongoing!
https://druthers.ca/
CASH UPDATES In a mixed set of updates here. CBDC Updates: https://libertysentinel.org/exposing-trumps-true-character/ Canadian reporter Alex Newman explains what gov’ts around the world are doing with CBDCs right now. India: advertising about banning Bitcoin Kuwait: Forced over 1 million citizens to hand over their bio-metric data (including fingerprints) and suspending services if they do not do so, including withdrawing or transferring money. Date for this was Sept. 30. 35 000 bank customers suspended from using bank services England: Bank England is preparing to force digital currencies if the banks do not do so. 93% of Central Banks in the world are working on a CBDC – this is truly frightening. USA: House of Representatives voted to pass a bill, The Anti- Surveillance State Act, 216-192, prohibiting the Federal Reserve from issuing a CBDC. It is concerning however, many still voted against this.
Florida: Passed a law banning CBDCs!
Support Protection of Cash Now – in Parliament! Bill C-400 SUMMARY This enactment provides for the development and implementation of a framework to ensure that cash continues to be available throughout Canada. It also amends the Currency Act and the Bank of Canada Act to remove the Governor in Council’s power to call in coins and notes. Finally, it amends the Bank of Canada Act to prohibit the Bank of Canada from issuing a digital form of the dollar. https://www.parl.ca/documentviewer/en/44-1/bill/C-400/first- reading https://preventgenocide2030.org/keep-cash-alive-support-bill-c-
400/
The Bank of Canada (B of C) has recently announced plans to suspend introduction of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) to the public. https://www.kitco.com/news/article/2024-09-20/bank-canada- suspends-plans-introduce-cbdc-public While this may sound victorious on its face, and there is much positive to say when such plans are shelved or put on hold, please remember the use of the word “suspend” as opposed to “cancel”. Has the B of C simply decided to wait on the outcomes and research from other countries and then simply tag along? In this past summer, the B of C was recommending Canada provide its own CBDC for digital payments. This apparently has been suspended or now put on hold. We can only hope for some permanency to this decision. We need a Constitutional amendment that 100% absolutely provides for the mandatory use and acceptance of cash for all transactions – in any amount. So, if you wish to pay $1 000 000.00 for a house in $100/bills, you should be allowed to so do. That is privacy. Conversely, Google has announced that the Google Wallet can now function as digital ID, based on the selling point of course, of convenience to the exclusion of all privacy. Once privacy is lost, so is freedom. “Imagine starting a vacation like this,” Google Wallet executive Alan Stapelberg wrote in a blog post last week. “You arrive at the airport and breeze through security by tapping your phone to a reader, scanning your boarding pass and ID. While waiting to board, you grab a drink at an airport bar, tapping your phone to prove your age. When you arrive at your destination, you find your rental car and leave the lot without stopping for an in-person ID check because you already provided the necessary information in the rental car app. You check into your hotel online and your key is issued straight to your digital wallet. You do all of this with your phone — no physical wallet required.” https://www.thegoldreport.com/news/google-announces-digital- id-wallet Though a bit late, in June, 2024, Norway passed legislation requiring use of cash! https://x.com/petersweden7/status/1843050565443395924?s=52 Yes to cash
In one of the most comprehensive reports to date on the issue of CBDC, the JCCF has just published: Central Bank Digital Currency? – What it is and how it could impact your privacy, security, and autonomy https://www.jccf.ca/wp- content/uploads/2025/03/CBDC_Final-Report_March- 17_Justice-Centre-for-Constitutional-Freedoms.pdf REMINDER New Credit Card Fees & Lack of Privacy It is starting – Use cash as much as possible – use credit cards or digital only if there is no other alternative. The Bank of Canada is admittedly planning for digital currency. It claims that it will not replace cash – BUT – and here is the caveat, it will continue to use cash “notes for as long as Canadians want them.” In other words, if you don’t use cash, you will lose it. Reading between the lines, it is clear that the Gov’t will simply issue press releases and polls showing most Canadians don’t use and/or don’t want cash, and then the Bank of Canada will claim it has to eliminate cash because few people are using it or want it, and it is, ironically, too costly to maintain printing the notes and coins. https://www.bankofcanada.ca/digitaldollar/#what-digital- canadian Bill Still, the US Patriot and author of the incredible documentary, The Money Masters, outlines the results of recent polls showing that 86% of Canadians fear the digital dollar!!! Wow. 87% of Canadians have heard or are aware of the Bank of Canada’s CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency), and 82% are strongly opposed to it!! https://www.thestillreport.com/post/bank-of-canada- survey-86-fear-digital-dollar-the-still-report-episode-4280 Companies will not use digital currency if we are not using digital currency! It will cost them too much in lost business. Here are two awesome posters that you can distribute to all businesses to put on their entrance doors, advocating for the use of cash. Print on 8 1/2 x 11 glossy hard stock for best results. For Business owners:
The dangers of digital gov’t ID and currencies are here… you need to use cash as much as possible. As recognized by Freedom Rising, there are many inherent dangers of using digital currency. What do you do, not if, but when: The internet is down There is a power outage The card reader malfunctions Your phone battery dies or doesn’t work for other reasons WE SUGGEST YOU CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS WELL: Your phone is stolen Your passwords are co-opted Your credit/debit card strip is damaged – needs replacing There are errors in relation to the quantum of $$ on your card Gov’t limits your purchases/CRA liens the balance on your card AND MANY OTHER DANGERS CLEAR has promoted the non-use of digital currencies and credit/debit cards as much as possible, for years. Suggested Solution: Withdraw money on Saturday/Sunday from the bank or bank machine, and then leave your money at home if you are scared to carry it with you, and just carry the amounts of cash for each day’s purchases for the week. NO MORE CARDS!!!! NO EXCUSES! USE CASH $$$$$$$$$ Do you want to be the next person to be “unbanked” because of your political beliefs???? Another sample: (thanks Adele)
Get these cards below at the CLEAR booth to give out every time you use cash – or print your own to hand out! Make Business sized cards to hand out at
all your cash purchases!
Sunday Paper Deliveries Next delivery day: Sunday, March 2, 2025 (Weather Permitting) Capril Mall, Gordon & Harvey St. (Hwy 97) A small group of dedicated volunteers have been spreading the truth via Druthers deliveries every Sunday for over 2 years now. This is one of the most powerful things a freedom activist can do to help inform the public. We meet every Sunday in the Capri Mall parking lot between A&W and DeDutch Pannekoeke House. Please note that if you have chosen to “fall back” to end Daylight Savings Time, meet-up time will be at 9:30 am for you until the government tells you to spring forward again in March. For those who don’t adhere to this senseless ritual, Druthers deliveries will continue to be at 10:30 am, Daylight Savings Time, all year long.
Thank You!
CLEARBITS: Dr. Hoffe and Lee Turner: Bonnie Henry knew vaccines were NOT safe and effective. https://freedomandinvesting.substack.com/p/review-of-foi-
f23-1799-part-1?triedRedirect=true
Aboriginal title has become a constitutional threat in Canada – Bruce Pardy – Law Professor https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/aboriginal-
title-has-become-constitutional-threat-canada
The attack on Christianity continues… EXCLUSIVE: Three cities that proclaimed Christian Heritage Month refuse in 2025 https://www.westernstandard.news/news/exclusive-three-cities- that-proclaimed-christian-heritage-month-refuse-in-2025/63120 UBCO bars students from creating Conservative club — Liberal club a-ok https://www.westernstandard.news/news/ubco-bars-students- from-creating-conservative-club-liberal-club-a-ok/63056 Muslims are taking over England as King Charles commits treason and breaks his Coronation Oath ‘Trust in Allah’ Signs Blanket London as King Charles Hands Out Ramadan Treats. https://thenationalpulse.com/2025/02/27/trust-in-allah-signs- blanket-london-as-king-charles-hands-out-ramadan-treats/ https://x.com/starknakedbrief/status/1890734832788881777?s=46
&t=5aDeE9N4pxwK8SIBoyTzOA
BC Conservatives have introduced a Bill into the Legislature to prevent future time changes and leave this on permanent daylight savings time (summer time). Call your MLA and tell them to vote for this! https://www.leg.bc.ca/parliamentary-business/overview/43rd- parliament/1st-session/bills/1st_read/m206-1.htm https://www.westernstandard.news/news/about-time-rustad-
Chart of the Day (CotD) Canada Digital Currency PANOPTICON, by Eldric Vero https://www.eastonspectator.com/2025/03/16/chart-of-the-day- cotd-canada-digital-currency-panopticon-by-eldric-vero/ More information on central bank digital currencies and their effects. 86% of Canadians opposed CBDCs. https://tnc.news/2023/11/30/canadians-oppose-bank-of-canada- digital-currency/ https://www.jccf.ca/reports/ A glimpse into China’s digital spying regime
https://action4canada.com/digital-id-resources/
More attacks on Freedom of Expression in Calgary and Edmonton – Gov’ts using bylaws to deny freedom of expression unless a permit is obtained – your freedom is now a licenced activity in Alberta – We need to win our Kelowna case later in August, 2025!! https://www.westernstandard.news/news/edmonton-protest- bylaw-faces-legal-challenge-over-charter- violations/62428?utm_source=website&utm_medium=related-
stories
A real Canadian Carney-val!!! Learn more about Mark Carney – the self-admitted Globalist https://candicemalcolm.com/carney- lies/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email https://www.westernstandard.news/opinion/hannaford-theres-a- lot-mark-carney-has-written-that-he-doesnt-care-to-talk- about/62948 https://stand4thee.com/f/say-no-criminal-carney https://www.eastonspectator.com/2025/02/16/carney-says-he-is- an-elitist-and-a-globalist-which-is-exactly-what-canada-needs-not-
sure-youre-supposed-to-say-that-mate/
The COVID-CON continues to unravel with more Gov’t admissions: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/germany-knew- covid-lab-leak-early-2020-hid-evidence-from-public/ The European Court of Justice considers that doctors will be solely responsible for the consequences of covid injections because they were free to refuse to inject https://www.europereloaded.com/european-court-of-justice- doctors-will-be-solely-responsible-for-the-consequences-of-covid- injections/ https://www.buongiornosuedtirol.it/2025/02/19/esclusivo-vaccini- covid-la-corte-ue-serviva-la-prescrizione-e-il-medico-poteva-
I warned people everywhere about Rustad from the beginning. Now it appears at least three Conservatives have jumped ship because of Rustad and the intentional voting irregularities that occurred at the recent Conservative meeting in Nanaimo. https://globalnews.ca/news/11074548/3-bc-conservatives- independents/?utm_source=NewsletterBc&utm_medium=Email&ut m_campaign=2025 https://globalnews.ca/news/11071997/dallas-brodie-booted-from- bc-conservatives-over-residential-school- comments/?utm_source=NewsletterBc&utm_medium=Email&utm_ campaign=2025 https://www.rebelnews.com/true_blue_trio_breaks_silence_followin
Freedom Rallies Visibility = Credibility “It ain’t over till it’s over” Next Kelowna Rallies: Saturdays 12:00 noon March 22, 2025 Hwy 97 & Cooper April 5, 2025 Stuart Park!! Join us for important announcements on the local, legal scene, and informative speakers!
March 5, 2025 12:00 noon Vernon Freedom Rally 12:00 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. @ Polson Park Join Ted for the Largest rally in the North Okanagan, and growing weekly! North Okanagan Shuswap Freedom Radio
http://s1.voscast.com:11464/stream
March 5, 2025 12:00 noon Kamloops Freedom Gathering
March 5, 2025 12:00 noon Oliver Freedom Rally 12:00 p.m.
Town Hall
CLEAR Telegram With almost 530 members now and growing, join us in our C.L.E.A.R. Telegram group! Please remember: no foul language, abuse or vulgarity for any posts, keep posts relevant to today’s freedom issues, humour is fine, be respectful at all times. Government officials, police, agents or their posts are not accepted nor permitted on this site. Please ensure as best you can, that material you post is accurate and correct. Posting false or incorrect information is not acceptable. Help us ensure all posts are verified for correctness. Opinions and discussions on relevant issues are also encouraged. This is a private group for trusted people and friends only. https://t.me/+SWxndPh1I9F2Iu-q
Political Prisoner Les Bory Sentenced to Time Served (3 Years) For Podcasts Deemed Hate: Jewish Lobby Still Not Satisfied
Brantford, March 10, 2025. In Ontario Superior Court this morning, political prisoner Les Bory was sentenced to time served.On January 14, He was convicted of one count of promoting genocide against Jews, one count of wilfully promoting hate, one count of uttering threats against police, and one count of uttering threats against politicians. The Crown had asked that Mr. Bory provide a DNA sample, a degrading demand as the charges had nothing to do with sex.
The Crown had asked for the maximum, five years, for the genocide count, one year for the hate charged, to be served concurrently, one year each on the uttering threatsd charges to be served consecutively adding up to seven. Mr. Bory was entitled to time and a half for the 23 months plus he spent in remand in the Maplehurst Detention Centre. His lawyer in his submissions noted that Mr,.Bory spent 665 days in a 7 foot by 9 foot cell meant for 2 men but filled with three. Lawyer Ian McCuaig denounced the isolation caused by frequent lockdowns and overcrowding as “inhumane.”Mr. McCuaig meticulously reviewed the length of recent sentences for conviction under the hate law and argued that the Crown’s demands were excessively harsh.
In pronouncing his sentence, the judge noted the videos were “mind numbingly boring” and reached an average audience of about 200.
Five Jewish groups or individuals submitted victim impact statements. Mr. Bory had mentioned none of these individuals or groups in his broadcasts. Yet, they paraded themselves as “victims”. Four outspoken anti-free speech groups — the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith, the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, the Friends of the Simon Weisenthal Centre, and the Canadian Anti-Semitism Education. This organization’s spokesman Michael Tefler claimed: “Every Jewish person is a victim of Mr. Bory’s crime.” Richard Roberts of B’nai Brith charged” ‘The actions of Mr. Bory … repeating tropes denying the holocaust … have made Jews feel insecure and afraid and unwanted.” The Jewish lobby was furious that the sentence was not harsher.
“This sentence does not adequately reflect the severity of Bory’s actions and sends a troubling message about the consequences of promoting hatred and violence,” said Jamie Kirzner-Roberts of the Friends of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre.
“For those who cannot go upon this journey But must remain to battle when I’m gone I pray that when the struggle is too weary I can from beyond the restless fury Stretch forth my arm and help to make you strong.”
Remembered always with love and gratitude. Keltie, Cadeyrn and Kalonica
