Parroting Plagiarizing, the Artificial Intelligence Plundering

Posted on by

Kathleen Dudley

Dec 26, 2025

What better way than to destroy one’s mind by giving up thought, curiosity, self awareness and creativity, than to delve into the plundering by Artificial Intelligence, AI.. When we look at whom created AI, and consider the nefarious nature of something programmed by a system intended to destroy humanity from the inside out, we only have to look at all the other historical “tools” presented to make our lives “easier”, more efficient, and therefore supposedly giving us more time. Time for what, I ask? To use AI, to learn about the rewritten history, theories, philosophies, so-called “values”, and priorities that technocracy uses to plunder societies?

With each “tool” we lose more of our connection to ourselves, to Nature, to our very roots, and specifically to our ancestral beginnings. According to world scholar, John Lamb Lash, author of NOT IN HIS IMAGE, the definitive book on the Gnostics, “The Gnostics identified the root of evil on this planet– rooting out transhumanism, the madness of AI and technocracy.” John Lamb Lash considers those using AI “to be such lazy asses as to give AI to think for you” when in fact, he says, “AI is a shit test.” And those who do not understand this term, please do your own research, without AI answering what you fundamentally must learn from within.

A fine interview by Lucas on Age of Truth with John Lamb Lash in 2023*, gives criticism of AI’s inability to ponder and consider, which is the very reason I write about AI today. When we give up or never claim our sovereignty to delve into the mysteries of living, of thinking, of experiencing, of creating, of beauty, we do not fully live. John claims that “the human spirit longs and hungers to express its creativity– that you do it as a sovereign act because you have it in you.” Why else might we be deterred to create from within our own mind? A lack of self confidence, a lack of self love, John speculates, or perhaps circumstances, obstacles, keeping us from creating.

I look at Substack writers who claim knowledge, but obviously use AI for their writing, not only to create the very structure of their writings, but the premise, the substance, and the conclusions. They ultimately attach their own personal identitifcation to their robotic essays. These publications were once left to scholars like John Lamb Lash, Henri Troyat, and master writers like Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Alexander Pushkin, Leo Tolstoy, Ezra Pound, T.S. Eliot, and many others who lived and breathed through their own hearts and souls.

Perhaps the most glaring of these assaults upon everyone exposed to these false productions used by Substack so-called “writers” is their omission citing AI as their source. This plagiarizing gives a false sense to the reader, that this writer, whether it is Falken, Medicine Girl, or Agent, researched, created, produced and ultimately synthesized historical information from revisionist history and source documents, rather than AI’s single mouthpiece, designed, artificially synthesized and intended to misdirect their readership whose hunger for truth is fed with AI fiction.

When Substack writers use AI, it becomes clear. The depth into which they delve, their opinions, self-assured and pointed, always away from the ancestral markings, and against the truth which becomes hijacked by those in power, whether it be the monarchy in Ancient Rome, the Bolsheviks fomenting their revolution against the Russian dynasty, Karl Marx and his singular stab at individuality, freedom, the existence of Soul, and fundamentally, Creation itself.

The paradigm ruling today at the fingers of the Rockefeller, Rothschild, Warburg bankers and politicians, media and educational institutions, not to speak of the allopathic dynasty directing the outcome of quality of life for those using its methods, rule with money, power and control. Their greatest “tools” unleashed upon societies include usury, central banking, credit cards, loans, microwave ovens, cellphones, wifi, 5 G, GMOs, estrogenic herbicides and pesticides, addictive substances, and the “innocuous” marijuana claimed to not be addictive, but systematically dulling ambition, clouding purpose, diminishing incentive and resulting in mens’ inability to achieve their raison d’etre and fulfill their responsibilitiy to family and society.

A recent article on homeopathy, a 200 year old modality, gentle, healing, and available to everyone, trashed homeopathy by Substack writer, Medicine Girl. Her opening two paragraphs expressed her sentiments and lack of knowledge, then she surrendered her diatribe to AI which assaulted this wondrously fine system German doctor, Samuel Hahnemann discovered and brought forward to the world in the late 1700s. A method of healing that uses the energy of substances to resonnate with our own body’s energy, to bring healing resolution and homeostasis. A healing modailty that does not harm, and is in alignment with the ethical Hippocratic oath, nearly 2,500 years old. And yet, this oath is violated, daily by conventional medicine whose use of the Rockefeller big pharma drugs, radical surgeries and unnecessary amputations of body parts, claim lives, quality of living using fear to prod people into harm’s way.

Why would anyone who presents themselves as “wholistic,” trash homeopathy, I ask myself? Only controlled opposition uses such a posture, or someone who is not fully self aware, unable to distinguish between truth and lies. Someone who is confused, overwhelmed by the depth and complexity of words that when used as grimoire, confuse and obfuscate truth and the real meaning behind the statements. Vladimir Lenin was known to claim that confusing the meaning of words, you confuse the mind. I suspect someone will one day post that “using AI to confuse the meaning of truth, you ultimately confuse societies, remove all sense of right and wrong and individuals’ abilities to parse out truth from fiction.” Hmmmmm.

But then, AI is fiction, according to John Lamb Lash. And bingo. No wonder it holds that allure for its users. Anything goes, no need for footnotes, no need for references of any sort, no need for quotation marks, there are no checks and balances, no accountability what-so-ever. Everything is made up and everything has a place on the stage in the theatre of actors and acting.

When I read Falken’s extensive writing on the Gnostics, claiming that they were “antagonistic to Nature,” I was shocked and stupified. If ever a society embraced and held sacred, Nature, it was the Gnostics. But when Falken so-called “claimed” that they struck out at the Christians, I knew he was reading the lies AI presents to anyone unaware of true history. Controlled opposition speaks truths, seduces us, our egos, our minds, to read and listen more to what they have to present. And then, in the midst of their claims, they drop their bombs, their lies, their harmful statements that eschew truth, while our own discernment has been disassembled and led asunder by AI drivel. No reference in Falken’s writing that AI led his production which he posted as his, and his alone. But do read the exchanges we had on his Substack on this writing. It is like wasabe up the nostrils to expose yet another fake who writes under the ghostwriter’s invisibility. Layer upon layer of false identity. Authenticity lacks, and when authenticity lacks, so does truth. Including integrity–and the honour, and our connection to our ancestors with whom we owe our lives today. Falken claims to be speaking truth, hides behind a moniker, uses AI for his writings, claiming a knowledge he most certainly lacks and leaves his readers to think that he knew this stuff and is bringing it forward because we want to know, too.

The breadth of writing by Substack writer, Agent swooned me. And on issues as critical as vitamins and supplementation, information of which I am well read. But his level of so-called “knowledge,” the depth of his “research” gave him in my mind, superiority over all I had read because of the depth and detail and certainty woven into all the material. Over the many months, seeing the copious postings on his Substack, then reading the abominable castration of homeopathy by Medicine Girl, and noting their referencing one another in their writings, I recognized the patterning of the “speak” of their prolific AI writing. Agent, perhaps hides his use of AI better than Medicine Girl and Falken, but prove me incorrect that all three could not produce without AI. My intuitive knowing has plucked these impersonators out of the waters. Let them write, let them speak, but please, let them use their own minds, to bring forth their own ideas, their perspectives and research, but not more of the AI god of technocracy, the communist “one mind” with which Karl Marx and Frederich Engels created to curse the world.

Truly, John Lamb Lash’s statement, that folks who use AI are, “lazy asses,” proves itself time and again. Holds a light to show us that reality, that our very connection to the Natural world, is bypassed, over-ridden, extinguished, and surplanted by the shit test–AI fiction. Anyone claiming that AI has a place in their life has already sold their soul to the technocracy that twists, rewrites all that is real, natural and truthful. AI is the fictional character no differently than what the corporate tribunals and their banks impose upon humanity. The Gnostic teachings expose the strawman argument, the revisionist history books expose the truth, and source documents give us the very words and perspectives of those of that day. Truth is the greatest threat to evil, to lies, to those who hide in the shadows. The resonance of our energy, of light, against dark. Let truth be our guide, not the fiction of AI.

*

https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Qmz5RFrsucM?rel=0&autoplay=0&showinfo=0&enablejsapi=0

JOHN LAMB LASH ~ “A.I. vs. Hate ~ The Illusion Of Compassion – The Game Changer” [Age Of Truth TV]

Donations to this Substack can be made to:

Paypal.me/Kathleendudley1 Thank you. Kathleen Dudley

Update from Italian Political Prisoner Joe Fallisi (en francais and in English)

Posted on by

Ostuni, le 26 décembre 2025 
Chers amis,                      merci infiniment, avant tout, pour votre solidarité, qui a été pour moi comme un rayon de soleil dans les ténèbres.Hier seulement, après des mois d’attente, j’ai réussi à récupérer mon compte Gmail et enfin tous mes e-mails, listes de diffusion, etc. – un cadeau du Soleil Invincible. Je suis fatigué et épuisé, non pas tant par mon malheur, qui, comparé à une seule journée de souffrance endurée par les martyrs et les héros palestiniens pendant deux ans, est insignifiant, mais plutôt par les pertes personnelles et collectives qui l’ont accompagné. Ainsi, plus nous vieillissons, plus notre arbre perd ses feuilles, approchant du grand hiver. Et toutes ces feuilles sont désormais pour moi des branches entières, des parties vitales qui disparaissent irrémédiablement. D’abord la mort, qui m’a frappé comme un coup de tonnerre, de John Kaminski, puis celle de Gian Paolo Pucciarelli, puis celle de Guillaume Nichols, tous trois de vrais amis, auxquels j’étais très attaché… et la douloureuse rupture avec Michèle Renouf… enfin, le départ de mon cher Rexbel pour le paradis des chiens. Et avec cela, la monstrueuse catastrophe que les Juifs, avec l’approbation et l’aide de la foule complice de leurs Shabbos goyim, ont provoquée et continuent d’infliger à la Palestine, à la Syrie, au Yémen, au Liban… Ce qui se passe et le silence lâche de mes concitoyens me laissent sans voix. Mais voici mon histoire personnelle, car je vous la dois depuis longtemps : 
4 décembre 2024, 6 h 00. On frappe violemment à la porte. Une douzaine d’agents de la DIGOS (notre mini-NKVD, au service de l’internationale de Shylock) font irruption. Leur chef m’informe qu’ils doivent procéder, sur ordre du parquet de Bologne, à la perquisition de l’appartement et me demande si j’ai un avocat ou s’ils doivent m’en désigner un d’office. Je pense à Angelo Cerasino (dont je sais que certains d’entre vous ont déjà pris contact), un excellent avocat, en droit civil comme en droit pénal, et l’un de mes rares amis sincères ici à Ostuni. J’essaie donc de l’appeler (à cette heure-là !)… Il répond et accepte immédiatement. La perquisition commence et on me remet l’énorme dossier d’enquête. Pendant qu’ils mettent tout sens dessus dessous et que Vitalma, ma fidèle compagne, se comporte comme un vrai Lion, je m’assieds et commence à lire. 

Je n’en crois pas mes yeux et je me pince presque pour savoir si c’est réel ou si je suis encore en train de rêver. La juge et la procureure, toutes deux des femmes, du tribunal de Bologne, m’accusent d’appartenir, en tant qu’« idéologue », à une « organisation terroriste » qui aurait prétendument planifié l’assassinat de notre (malheureusement) actuelle Première ministre itaGlienne, Giorgia Meloni, fervente partisane de Trump et ultra-sioniste (!). Je suis abasourdie et j’ai presque envie de rire, car, évidemment, je n’y connais rien. En fait, plus je lis, plus je réalise qu’ils m’ont habilement piégé, en tant que « mauvais professeur », dans une histoire (plus ou moins risible) qui m’était totalement étrangère, simplement parce que j’avais accordé une interview (et je maintiens mes propos mot pour mot) à l’excellent périodique en ligne « Ardire », et que j’avais participé à des discussions Telegram en y partageant mes écrits théorico-historiques sur le révisionnisme et la question juive, ainsi que des contre-informations quotidiennes et opportunes concernant le génocide en cours des Palestiniens par les abominables meurtriers et ignobles tortionnaires Juifs. S’ils m’avaient poursuivi uniquement pour ces « délits de pensée », j’aurais été inculpé, mais libre et sans aucune attention médiatique. Au lieu de cela, en me plaçant dans ce piège, ils ont pu m’incarcérer après un “blitz” et donner carte blanche aux vautours de la presse. Ténor, anarchiste (ou ex-anarchiste), auteur de « La Ballade de Pinelli », pro-palestinien, 76 ans… « nazi », « négationniste », « antisémite »… dans le talon de l’Italie, écrivaient-ils !… quel morceau succulent pour de tels œsophages (eux et leurs lecteurs) !

Ils veulent (on imagine aisément surtout qui) me punir pour mes idées et mon engagement pour la justice en Palestine. Et le fait que cela soit orchestré par le bras judiciaire« de gauche », d’un gouvernement « de droite » complaisant envers Israël est encore plus significatif. Le cercle vicieux est fermé. Le grand paradoxe, en réalité, est que dans kosherhamburgerland, ce pays totalement soumis au lobby pro-israélien, je ne serais probablement même pas… inquiété pour mes opinions « incorrectes » ! Et ce, grâce au Premier Amendement de la Constitution américaine, longtemps, mais jusqu’ici sans succès, la cible des Juifs… tout comme le droit des citoyens américains de posséder des armes à domicile – un peuple qui peut (pourrait) penser et s’exprimer librement… et, qui plus est, armé… peut-être contre ses propres tyrans !… Quelle horreur !

Je vous renvoie à un message sur « Libertari » (qui, soit dit en passant, est de retour, pleinement fonctionnel et intact sur Band, qui s’est enrichi d’un autre groupe de qualité, « Undicesimo Toro », https://www.band.us/band/96714422/post) où vous trouverez divers détails sur mon aventure et ses conséquences jusqu’à présent :

AVANTI, SEMPRE!, https://band.us/band/84909813/post/15202.

J’espère que vous n’avez jamais soupçonné que j’oublierais le Prix International Robert Faurisson. Si, cette année, pour des raisons tout à fait imprévues, il n’a pas pu avoir lieu (bien que je sache que des amis italiens s’y sont rendus le 25 janvier pour déposer des fleurs sur la tombe du professeur), la septième édition du Prix se tiendra dans moins d’un mois, le jour de l’anniversaire de Robert, et selon le format habituel.

Alors, à vous tous qui pouvez venir et participer, je vous invite à me rejoindre à 11h00 à l’endroit habituel. Après Ursula Haverbeck (2019), Vincent Reynouard (2020), Wolfgang Fröhlich (2021), Monika Schaefer et son frère Alfred (2022), Germar Rudolf (2023) et Arthur Butz (2024), nous aurons une fois de plus le plaisir de remettre le Prix Robert Faurisson à qui le mérite véritablement.

J’aime à penser que c’est le Professeur lui-même qui a accueilli le fidèle, intelligent et intègre Guillaume aux portes dorées des Champs-Élysées d’une étreinte radieuse.

De même, j’imagine la grande pianiste italienne Maria Tipo, qui, elle aussi, nous a quittés récemment, trouvant à cette même porte deux hommes de grande valeur, artistes immortels, qui l’admiraient autant qu’elle les admirait : son comcitoyen Sergio Fiorentino et Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli.

En attendant de vous revoir le 25 janvier 2026 et en vous souhaitant une meilleure année que la précédente, je vous dédie à tous, et plus particulièrement à ma très chère amie Yvonne Schleiter, trois magnifiques sonates de Domenico Scarlatti :

Domenico Scarlatti, SONATE L. 122, L. 142, L. 265 – Maria Tipo (1969)

https://archive.org/details/maria-tipo-plays-three-scarlatti-sonatas-live-1969

Bien à vous,

Joe Fallisi

********

Ostuni, December 26, 2025

Dear friends, 

first of all, thank you so much for your solidarity, which has been, for me, like a ray of sunshine in the darkness. Only yesterday, after months of waiting, I was able to get my Gmail account back, and thus finally all my inboxes, mailing lists, etc.—a gift from the Unconquered Sun.

I am tired and worn out, but not so much by my misfortune, which, compared to even one day of what the Palestinian martyrs-heroes have endured for two years, is worth less than zero, but rather by the personal and collective grief that has accompanied it. I know that the older we get, the more our tree loses its leaves (friends, dear ones…), approaching the great winter. And yet, more than leaves, for me they are now entire branches, vital parts that disappear irremediably. First the death, which struck me like a bolt from the blue, of John Kaminski, then that of Gian Paolo Pucciarelli, then that of Guillaume Nichols, all three true Friends, to whom I was very fond… and the painful breakup with Michèle Renouf… finally the ascension of my beloved Rexbel to dog heaven. And along with it, the monstrous catastrophe that the Jews, with the approval and aid of the complicit global throng of their Shabbos goyim, have brought about and continue to inflict on Palestine, Syria, Yemen, Lebanon… What is happening and the cowardly silence of my fellow citizens leaves me exhausted and speechless. But here’s a little about my personal story, because I’ve been owing it to you for a long time:

December 4, 2024, 6 a.m. There’s a furious knocking on my door. A dozen DIGOS agents (our mini-NKVD, in the service of Shylock’s international) enter. Their boss informs me that they must proceed, by order of the Bologna Prosecutor’s Office, to search the apartment, and asks if I have a lawyer of my own choosing, or if they should appoint one ex officio. I think of Angelo Cerasino (whom I know some of you have called/written to), an excellent lawyer, both civil and criminal, and one of my few true friends here in Ostuni. So I try calling him (at that hour!)… he answers and accepts immediately. The search begins, and I’m handed the enormous file of the investigation. While they proceed to turn everything upside down, and Vitalma, my good companion, is acting like a true Leo, I sit down and start reading. I can’t believe my eyes and almost pinch myself to know if this is real or if I’m still asleep and dreaming. A judge and a public prosecutor, both women, from the Bologna court accuse me of being an “ideologist” in a “terrorist organization” that allegedly planned to kill our (unfortunately) current Prime Minister of ItaGly, the Trump-supporting and ultra-Zionist Giorgia Meloni (!). I’m shocked and almost laugh, since, obviously, I know nothing about any of this. In fact, as I continue reading, I realize they’ve cleverly placed me, as a “bad teacher,” in a (more or less laughable) story that was completely foreign to me, simply because I’d given an interview (and to this day I stand by it word for word) to a fine online periodical, “Ardire,” and contributed to Telegram chats with my theoretical-historical writings on revisionism and the Jewish question, along with timely, daily counter-information regarding the ongoing genocide of the Palestinians by vile Jewish murderers and filthy torturers. If they’d prosecuted me solely for these “thoughtcrimes,” I would have been charged, but at liberty and without any media attention. Instead, by placing me in that cauldron, they were able to incarcerate me after a special raid and give free rein to the hyena-vultures of the press. Tenor, anarchist (or former anarchist), author of “The Ballad of Pinelli,” pro-Palestinian, 76 years old… “Nazi,” “denier,” “anti-Semitic”… in the heel of Italy, they wrote! What a succulent morsel for such esophaguses (them and their readers)!

They want (one can only imagine who) to punish me for my ideas and my work for justice in Palestine. And that the long, “left-wing” judicial arm of a “right-wing” Israel-licking government is doing it is even more significant. The evil circle is closed. The great paradox, in fact, is that in kosherhamburgerland, a country totally subservient to the Hook Lobby, it’s likely I wouldn’t even be… investigated for my “incorrect” opinions! And this is because of the First Amendment to the US Constitution, which has long been, but so far unsuccessfully, been targeted by the Jews… along with the freedom of American citizens to keep guns at home – a people who can (could) think and express themselves freely… and what’s more, armed… perhaps against their own tyrants!… How horrible!

I refer you to a post on “Libertari” (by the way, it’s also back, fully functional and intact, and now joined by another worthy group, “Undicesimo Toro,” https://www.band.us/band/96714422/post) where you’ll find various details about my adventure and its aftermath so far:

AVANTI, SEMPRE!, https://band.us/band/84909813/post/15202.

I hope none of you ever thought I’d forget about the Robert Faurisson International Prize. While this year, for truly unforeseen reasons, it couldn’t take place (though I know some Italian friends went anyway on January 25th to lay flowers at the Professor’s grave), the seventh edition of the Prize will take place in less than a month, on Robert’s birthday, and in the usual way.

So, to all of you who can come and participate, I invite you to meet me at 11:00 a.m. at the usual location. After Ursula Haverbeck (2019), Vincent Reynouard (2020), Wolfgang Fröhlich (2021), Monika Schaefer and her brother Alfred (2022), Germar Rudolf (2023), and Arthur Butz (2024), we will once again be able to award the Robert Faurisson Prize to someone who truly deserves it.

I like to think that it was the Professor himself who welcomed the faithful, intelligent, and upright Guillaume at the golden gates of the Champs-Élysées with a radiant embrace.

Likewise, I see the great Italian pianist Maria Tipo, who also recently “passed on,” finding two gentlemen and immortal artists waiting for her at the same door who admired her as much as she admired them: her fellow countryman Sergio Fiorentino and Arturo Benedetti Michelangeli.

Seeing you on January 25, 2026, and wishing you a better New Year than the last, I dedicate to all of you, and especially to my very dear friend Yvonne Schleiter, three wonderful sonatas by Domenico Scarlatti:

Domenico Scarlatti, SONATE L. 122, L. 142, L. 265 – Maria Tipo (1969)

https://archive.org/details/maria-tipo-plays-three-scarlatti-sonatas-live-1969.

Yours

Joe Fallisi

Bill Whatcott Christmas Message & Legal Update

Posted on by

Whatcott Christmas Update

God’s Son came to earth to redeem us from our sin. This is why Christians celebrate Christmas.

“And the angel said to them, “Fear not, for behold, I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord. And this will be a sign for you: you will find a baby wrapped in swaddling cloths and lying in a manger.” And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among those with whom He is pleased!” Luke 2:10-14

Sodomites and other lost souls celebrate Christmas too, but they do not know or understand the significance of the event they are celebrating. They fail to comprehend and may never have even heard of what happened in Bethlehem approximately 2000 years ago. The Christmas Season reminds us that God loves us so much that He sent His only begotten Son to pay the price for our sin, as we apart from His grace are in such darkness that we are unable to atone for our sins by ourselves. It is God’s gift of His Son who came to earth and was crucified that paid the price for us and which enables us to come to Him.

“For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.” Romans 1:26-28

As I write this and reflect on this Holy Season, its significance, and why the original meaning this holiday matters an awful lot, I am sitting in the Edmonton airport on my way to Ontario for Christmas. I can definitely use some prayers this season and I am thankful for those of you who read my updates and make the effort to pray for me.

As for my legal status, my final hearing before I go to trial is January 29th. I will be attending this hearing via zoom. If someone wishes to attend in person the hearing will begin at 10:00 at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on 361 University Ave, in downtown Toronto. Justice Heather McArthur (a Trudeau appointee) will be rendering her decision on wether or not homosexual activist academic Nick Mule’s “expert” evidence can be introduced in my trial. Because my court proceedings are under a publication ban I won’t be able to say anything about what went on in the hearing, so if you want to know you will either have to attend in person or by zoom. I will get the zoom link from my lawyer a day or two before the hearing starts.

The trial dates for my alleged “hate crime” are May 25 – June 12, 2026. I will be required to be in Toronto and to appear in court in person for this trial. The courts have been gracious enough to allow me to travel through the United States to get to my trial, enabling me to visit my former pastor and some of my supporters. This will also save me hotel costs and gas costs, as gas in the USA is less than half what it is when I have to drive through northern Ontario.

I am very pleased that the US Department of Homeland Security evaluated my outstanding “hate crime” charge and the fact I have been acquitted once already and am being forced to go on trial again for the same charge and they decided my alleged “hate crime” is no crime at all in the USA. Last year they granted me the most generous waiver possible with unlimited access to visiting the United States. (I will need a waiver for the rest of my life to enter the United States due to being convicted of illegal entry back in 2002 when I went over the border illegally to witness at Duncan’s abortuary and preach at a Wisconsin Christians United event.)

I wanted to keep my promise to speak at a Wisconsin Christians United Event as I was already paid to speak at it in Septemeber 2002 and I wanted to keep my promise to picket Duncan’s abortuary in Milwaukee. I was able to witness at Duncan’s abortuary with Missionaries to the Preborn in previous years, but in 2002 I wound up enjoying the hospitality of the Minot and Sherbourne county jails for a couple months and never did make it to his abortuary. (But at least I tried) After my stay in the county jails, I was deported from the United States and was banned for 10 years. As for Duncan the abortionist, even though he failed to benefit from my ministry, he self destructed himself and praise God, his abortuary closed on its own after Duncan was convicted of illegal cocaine possession and domestic battery (being the good feminist he claimed to be).

Anyway, while I am in the Hamilton and Toronto areas I can be reached at 403-598-0478 if you are in the area and would like to get together for a coffee.

In Christ’s Service, Bill Whatcott

“For to us a child is born, to us a Son is given; and the government shall be upon His shoulder, and His name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.” Isaiah 9:6

Adam Skelly Challenges COVID Tyranny in Court

Posted on by

With Derek Sloan and Chris Weisdorf. 

This is the COVID challenge that should have been heard years ago. It wasn’t. End of February, it finally will be. The evidence is overwhelming. There is no way out for the government. Adam is literally the last man standing who has standing to challenge the tyrannical COVID restrictions in court. The ramifications of this case will be felt across Canada, the United States and the rest of the British common law world. Please give generously, ***especially*** if you don’t reside here. The only alternative is to wait until your own government investigates itself, finds wrongdoing, and then punishes and corrects its own behaviour. Don’t trust. Don’t wait. Become a part of this today. Even if you’ve done nothing to support the cause until now, you’ll be glad you did. Thank you, godspeed and God bless. 🌟🙏✨

Adam Skelly: Canada’s Last Chance to Challenge the Lockdowns

This is an important case, and I want people to really remember why.

In November 2020, when most of us felt powerless being locked down again, Adam Skelly gave us hope. Real hope. I remember being glued to the livestreams, like so many others. Watching him open Adamson BBQ in Toronto. Watching people line up, not just for food, but to support someone who finally said no, and to do a ‘normal’ thing like sit down at a restaurant. It felt like a turning point. Like maybe this madness could be stopped.

Adam Skelly was the first business owner in Canada to openly defy the COVID emergency orders. Long before the Convoy, he stepped forward, alone.

By day three, the state showed its hand. Around 100 police. Some on horses. Locks changed before dawn under orders from Public Health. Adam broke back into his own restaurant, cooked food, and fed people anyway. Then he was arrested and taken away in handcuffs. I will never forget watching that unfold in real time. The hope we felt turned into shock and anger. One man standing alone was crushed.

You can still watch that Day 3 livestream here:

Now, years later, this case is finally going to court. The hearing is set for February 25 to 27.

This matters because Adam’s case is the ONLY case in Canada with standing to challenge the COVID emergency orders. This is our last chance. No other legal case can do this. The limitation period is over and there are no others waiting. If this case dies, that chapter is closed forever. We can still win. We need to win – just remember what those days felt like – do we want that again?

To finish the case, Adam needs about $80,000, with $50,000 already past due. The government does not want this heard. That tells you everything.

If you remember watching those livestreams. If you remember how it felt to see someone finally stand up. This is where it leads.

Please donate if you can and share this. Once this case is gone, there is no second chance.

Donate here:

https://www.fundingthefight.ca/donate_adam

Or e-transfer: fundingthefight@proton.me

Password: Freedom

Memo: Adam

Canadian university censors free speech advocate who spoke out against Indigenous ‘mass grave’ hoax

Posted on by

Canadian university censors free speech advocate who spoke out against Indigenous ‘mass grave’ hoax

Todayville

From LifeSiteNews

By Anthony Murdoch

Dr. Frances Widdowson was arrested and given a ticket at the University of Victoria campus after trying to engage in conversation about ‘the disputed claims of unmarked graves in Kamloops.’

A Canadian academic who spoke out against claims there are mass unmarked graves of kids on former Indigenous residential schools, and who was arrested on a university campus as a result for trespassing, is fighting back with the help of a top constitutional group.

Dr. Frances Widdowson was arrested and given a ticket on December 2, 2025, at the University of Victoria (UVic) campus after trying to engage in conversation about “the disputed claims of unmarked graves in Kamloops,” noted the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) in a recent news release.

According to the JCCF, Widdowson was trying to initiate a “good faith” conversation with people on campus, along with the leader of OneBC provincial party, Dallas Brodi.

“My arrest at the University of Victoria is an indication of an institution that is completely unmoored from its academic purpose,” said Widdowson in a statement made available to LifeSiteNews.

She added that the “institution” has been “perpetuating the falsehood” of the remains of 215 children “being confirmed at Kamloops since 2021, and is intent on censoring any correction of this claim.”

“This should be of concern for everyone who believes that universities should be places of open inquiry and critical thinking, not propaganda and indoctrination,” she added.

UVic had the day before Widdowson’s arrest warned on its website that those in favor of free speech were “not permitted to attend UVic property for the purpose of speaking publicly.”

Despite the warning, Widdowson, when she came to campus, was met with some “100 aggressive protesters assembled where she intended to speak at Petch Fountain,” noted the JCCF.

The protesters consisted of self-identified Communists, along with Antifa-aligned people and Hamas supporters.

When Widdowson was confronted by university security, along with local police, she was served with a trespass notice.

“When she declined to leave, she was arrested, detained for about two hours, and charged under British Columbia’s Trespass Act—an offence punishable by fines up to $2,000 or up to six months’ imprisonment,” said the JCCF.

According to Constitutional lawyer Glenn Blackett, UVic actions are shameful, as it “receives hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars annually while it facilitates the arrest of Canadians attempting to engage in free inquiry on campus.”

Widdowson’s legal team, with the help of the JCCF, will be defending her ticket to protect her “Charter-protected freedoms of expression and peaceful assembly.”

Widdowson served as a tenured professor at Mount Royal University in Calgary, Alberta, before she was fired over criticism of her views on identity politics and Indigenous policy, notes the JCCF. She was vindicated, however, as an arbitrator later found her termination was wrongful.

In 2021 and 2022, the mainstream media ran with inflammatory and dubious claims that hundreds of children were buried and disregarded by Catholic priests and nuns who ran some Canadian residential schools. The reality is, after four years, there have been no mass graves discovered at residential schools.

However, as the claims went unfounded, over 120 churches, most of them Catholic and many of them on Indigenous lands that serve the local population, have been burned to the ground, vandalized, or defiled in Canada since the spring of 2021.

Last year, retired Manitoba judge Brian Giesbrecht said Canadians are being “deliberately deceived by their own government” after blasting the former Trudeau government for “actively pursuing” a policy that blames the Catholic Church for the unfounded “deaths and secret burials” of Indigenous children.

As reported by LifeSiteNews, new private members’ Bill C-254, “An Act To Amend The Criminal Code” introduced by New Democrat MP Leah Gazan, looks to give jail time to people who engage in so-called “Denialism.” The bill would look to jail those who question the media and government narrative surrounding Canada’s “Indian Residential School system” that there are mass graves despite no evidence to support this claim.

Portage–Lisgar MP warns Bill C-9 could ‘criminalize’ Bible passages

Posted on by

Portage–Lisgar MP warns Bill C-9 could ‘criminalize’ Bible passages

  • Steven Sukkau
  • Dec 19, 2025 Updated 2 hrs ago

Facebook Twitter

A Manitoba Conservative MP is warning that the federal government’s proposed Combating Hate Act could threaten religious freedom, claiming amendments tied to Bill C-9 may allow prosecutors to “criminalize quoting the Bible.”

Brandon Leslie, the Portage–Lisgar MP, posted the warning on Facebook this week, calling the legislation “Orwellian overreach” and urging Canadians to reject it. He also promoted a petition suggesting Liberal-Bloc amendments could be used to prosecute people who share scripture from the Bible, Quran, Torah or other religious texts.

“The state has no place in the religious texts or teachings of any faith community,” the petition says, arguing that freedom of expression and religion must be protected.

Leslie repeated the accusations in Question Period, accusing the Liberals of trying to “police the thoughts of Canadians” by “making amendments to criminalize sections of sacred texts.” He linked Bill C-9 to broader cultural grievances, claiming Liberals “tacitly support tearing down statues” and are waging a war on “values, faith and heritage.”

Bill C-9 would criminalize intimidation or obstruction at religious and cultural sites, introduce tougher penalties for hate-motivated crimes, and ban public displays of Nazi or terrorist symbols except for legitimate purposes. Supplied

“Canadians do not want a government that wages war on their values, their faith, and their heritage,” he told the House.

**New criminal offences target intimidation and hate symbols**

Bill C-9 was tabled in the House of Commons on October 7, and aims to update hate-crime provisions, create new offences against intimidating or blocking access to religious and cultural sites, and ban the public display of Nazi and terrorist hate symbols unless for journalism, education, religion or art.

If passed, Bill C-9 would make it a criminal offence to intimidate someone in order to stop them from entering places of worship, cultural centres, schools, seniors’ homes or cemeteries, with penalties reaching up to 10 years in prison.

The bill would also make it illegal to intentionally obstruct access to those same locations, though it includes an exception for people who are there solely to obtain or communicate information — intended to protect peaceful protest and information sharing.

Another major component of the legislation is the creation of a new hate-crime offence that increases penalties when an underlying Criminal Code offence is motivated by hatred toward an “identifiable group,” such as those defined by race, religion, gender identity, sexual orientation, age or disability.

Finally, the bill proposes a new hate-propaganda offence that would prohibit the public display of Nazi swastikas, SS bolts or symbols linked to terrorist entities. The measure includes defences to allow legitimate purposes such as journalism, education, artistic expression or religious context, ensuring those uses would not be captured by the criminal prohibition.

The law would also allow police to seek wiretap warrants and DNA orders for intimidation crimes, and judges would be able to impose bail conditions like no-contact orders or geographic restrictions, subject to judicial discretion and review.

The Charter review explicitly states that “hatred” is defined as extreme vilification, not dislike or discomfort, and that the bill would not criminalize expression that merely “discredits, humiliates, hurts or offends.”

It also clarifies that legitimate religious expression, including quoting sacred texts, does not meet the legal threshold for hate promotion unless it is used with wilful intent to encourage violence or extreme vilification.

Justice Centre Defends Two Women Punished for Their Views on Woke Gender Ideology

Posted on by
When defending women and girls comes at a cost

Dear friend of freedom,

Every day, Canadian students from kindergarten onward are exposed to a “gender ideology” that encourages changing genders, undergoing harmful and often irreversible gender-transition treatments – all while keeping parents in the dark.Increasingly, parents and teachers face serious consequences for challenging this unscientific ideology and for advocating for the safety, privacy, and dignity of women and girls. Right now, Canadians Bryony Dixon and Amy McKay are facing exclusion and professional sanctions for standing up for women and girls. Defend safe spaces for women and girls
Bryony Dixon (Courtesy of Bryony Dixon)
On the west coast, mother-of-two Bryony Dixon opened her home to an international student during the 2023-2024 school year through her school district’s “Homestay” program, which connects international students with caring host families like Bryony’s. When another student asked to stay with her, Bryony submitted the same application to be a host family. This time, however, the school district ignored her application. After months of unanswered emails, she filed a Freedom of Information request to find out what had happened. What she learned was startling: school district officials had intentionally ignored her application because she had spoken publicly about the right of women and girls to access female-only spaces where biological males may not enter. Like thousands of parents across the country, Bryony cares about the privacy and safety of girls.Bryony had also raised concerns shared by many British Columbia parents about the Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) school curriculum, which teaches that students are expected to use peers’ preferred pronouns and that teachers may support a student’s chosen gender identity, including new names or pronouns, without notifying parents.Behind closed doors, and without any opportunity for Bryony to respond, administrators decided that her views made her unfit to participate. A mother trusted to provide a stable home for a young student was rejected solely for advocating for female rights.Bryony said, “Evidently, this district denies girls their voice, and endeavours to bar anyone brave enough to advocate for them. The district’s ongoing discrimination against me has denied female students contact with one of the few adults willing to stick their neck out for their rights to safety, dignity, and fairness.”Our lawyers have filed a complaint with the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal on behalf of Bryony, arguing that her school district discriminated against her by barring her from its Homestay program because of her political views.
Help us defend Bryony Dixon
Amy McKay (Courtesy of Amy McKay)
Meanwhile, in Ottawa, Ontario, former teacher and mother-of-two Amy McKay is facing the same problem. Amy has been an active member of her community for years: teaching with the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board, volunteering to run student clubs and activities, and hosting a neighborhood knitting and crochet group. In 2022, she decided to enhance her professional skills by studying counselling. During that time, she expressed her personal views online about the harms of gender ideology and gender-transition surgeries for minors. The Ottawa-Carleton District School Board responded by banning her from teaching in any of its schools. Amy’s own School Board even filed a complaint against her with the Ontario College of Teachers. Nearly two years later, in 2025, she received an ultimatum from her College: permanently surrender your teaching licence or face a formal investigation. Both Amy and Bryony (and many other Canadians) are being forced to self-censor, just to participate in society. With help from the Justice Centre, Amy has rejected the College’s demand, asserting her Charter-protected freedom of expression, which the College must balance in its decision-making.Reflecting on the ordeal, she said, “In a diverse and multicultural country, everyone’s rights must be considered and all are important. Attempting to silence, intimidate, or punish anyone for speaking about their experiences and their rights is wrong.” She now awaits the College’s decision on whether it will proceed with a full investigation.
Help us defend Amy McKay
These two mothers—living thousands of kilometres apart—share a troubling connection. Both were deeply involved in their school communities. Both spoke sincerely about issues affecting children. And both were punished for it. Parents who raise concerns about their children’s wellbeing are now being removed, excluded, pressured, or professionally sanctioned. School districts are taking political positions. Regulatory bodies are policing lawful opinions. The message to parents across the country is unmistakable: your views are unwelcome unless they comply with politically correct narratives. Stay silent.This is not how a free country treats its citizens, and it is not how a healthy society treats its parents. When parents are silenced, children lose their strongest advocates. Your support can ensure that these mothers—and many others—are not forced to fight alone. Your generosity makes it possible for the Justice Centre to fund important cases like these. Please stand with Bryony, with Amy, and with every parent willing to defend the rights of women and girls.  Yours sincerely,
John Carpay, B.A., LL.B.President and FounderJustice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms

Posted on by

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

Indian Residential School denialism is a tool to silence dissent
 
READ IN APP
 
Close to 2000 people wearing orange shirts joined a walk in Sydney this past Canada Day to show support for residential school survivors and victims. FILE Photo by Ardelle Reynolds /Ardelle Reynolds

Woke Watch Canada is a reader-supported publication. Please consider becoming a paying subscriber or making a one-time or recurring donation to show your support.

By James Pew

The villainous leader of the British Columbia conservatives, John Rustad, has struck again. Readers of this newsletter will remember last March when he ousted then conservative critic to the attorney general, Dallas Brodie, after she stood up for lawyer Jim Heller and mocked the alternate truths of social justice activists (i.e. your truth, my truth). Rustad, not wanting to defend free speech or broadly held conservative views, claimed disingenuously that Brodie’s words and tone were offensive to “survivors” of Indian residential schools, and removed her from the conservative caucus. Brodie has since launched a new provincial party called OneBC.

This time around, Rustad the Regrettable has fired Lindsay Shepherd from her communications staffer role following a post she published to X regarding Orange Shirt Day, from her personal profile on her personal time:

The orange shirt and the orange flag perpetuate untruths about Canadian history, such as the grandest lie of all that 215 children’s graves were unearthed in Kamloops.

It is a disgrace that this fake flag flies in front of the provincial parliament buildings, and it is a disgrace to see the shirt of lies framed prominently and permanently beside the coat of arms so that locals and tourists cannot view our insignia without having their eye drawn and redirected to the orange shirt.

I could not agree more with this sentiment! And I commend Lindsay Shepherd for having the principles, courage, and intelligence to express it publicly!

Although, in Canada, speaking ones conservative or Christian principles can be extremely costly. Shepherd is 32 weeks pregnant and was expecting to go on maternity leave in a few weeks. The callousness and apparent tone deaf quality of Rustad’s actions has made many conservatives furious across the country. Aren’t conservatives supposed to be the ones who support families?

But even if Shepherd wasn’t expecting a child and reliant on mat-leave benefits now denied her, Rustad so rapidly folding under political pressure, and throwing another strong intelligent conservative woman under the bus, is outrageous and unforgivable. Conservatives must have strength and principles and clearly Rustad has neither.

I included Shepherd’s story from 2017 involving Wilfrid Laurier University in my book-in-progress, What Happened To Canada? (section not yet published). A source I drew from was Shepherd’s own book written about what ended up being a national controversy. Diversity and Exclusion: Confronting the Campus Free Speech Crisis is an excellent examination of the excesses of woke authoritarianism happening at Canadian universities. In a nutshell, Shepherd, who at the time was a teaching assistant, showed a brief video clip of a Steve Paikin interview of controversial public figure Jordan Peterson. They were discussing the gender identity issue of pronouns, which was at the time a fairly new, and for most people, perplexing issue. The Diversity department at the university manufactured a complaint in order to censure Shepherd and enforce social justice orthodoxy — which doesn’t like outspoken figures like Jordan Peterson, or allow for debate on pronouns or any other social justice tenets.

In Canada, one area where the excesses of the social justice paradigm are obvious on the surface, and substantiated by evidence underneath, is all things First Nations. The country is going crazy over Truth and Reconciliation. The entire thing has been tainted by the Kamloops mass grave hoax. If what is called “reconciliation” is ever going to have a chance at achieving anything positive, the 215 so-called unmarked graves, or more recently “soil anomalies,” in the Kamloops apple orchard must be excavated. And that is just a start. For reconciliation to work, Canadians, including the Left, the media, political leaders, aboriginal leaders, and regular aboriginal people, must stop acting like they can talk over or dismiss people who disagree with them.

And further, the concept of Indian Residential School denialism needs to be rolled up into a tight cone-like shape and launched into outer space. Preferably, in the direction of the sun. It needs to disappear forever, and people who bring it up need to be scorned caustically. No one can or should have monopolistic control over historiography or historical research of any kind. So sit down you self-anointed equity-deserving clowns, because no lasting knowledge or history is ever going to be produced in the fashion you would like. Be good little Leftists and start participating in a non-revolutionary democratic society with liberal values like free-speech and freedom of intellectual/historical inquiry.

Readers of this newsletter know that I am contributing authour to the best-selling book, Grave Error: How the Media Misled Us (and the Truth about Residential Schools). On Tuesday, Michelle Good, the author of the fiction novel “Five Little Indians,” wrote an op-ed for the Toronto Star in which she claimed Grave Error was a “vitriolic and hateful diatribe denying the truth about residential schools and the intergenerational harms they caused, was self-published by a gaggle of hard-core denialists, determined to shore up the myth that residential schools were well-intentioned, abuses suffered there exaggerated or fabricated and that intergenerational harms do not exist.”

One of the books co-editors, Professor Tom Flanagan (the other is Chris Champion) was interviewed by journalist Clayton DeMaine, giving him the opportunity to set the record straight. In a piece for True North Wire, DeMaine describes the work as “a scholarly book debunking media claims about supposed unmarked mass graves.”

Professor Flanagan has challenged Good to a debate. She is welcomed to point out where there may be flaws in the evidence or reasoning used by the more than dozen authors who contributed to Grave Error. Further, Professor Flanagan explained that,

Grave Error is fully documented, with 800 footnotes. The book was published by True North; it was not self-published, nor was it rejected by the publishing industry. We chose True North because we wanted to release it quickly to counter what we saw as misinformation. As for the claim that it is a ‘vitriolic and hateful diatribe’—I’d like to see examples of what she considers vitriolic and hateful. It’s difficult to comment without specifics. Many readers and reviewers have said the book’s tone is measured and factual.

Conservatives, and intelligent principled Canadians, are going to continue challenging the Kamloops claim and the premise of Truth and Reconciliation. We just are! If it is made criminal to do this, a greater desire to do more of it will emerge. The truth cannot be suppressed. Not the truth of Canadian history and cultural heritage, including the truth of fruitful cooperative relations between settlers and aboriginals over more than a century of fur-trading in early Canada, nor the truth of Indian Residential Schools and colonialism. It is not denialism to argue that many of the claims associated with Indian Residential Schools, claims which are parroted by media and political leaders, are false or exaggerated. And it is not denialism to argue that colonialism was a net-benefit to both aboriginal and non-aboriginal Canadians. These are valid opinions supported by research, if you don’t like these opinions because there is something wrong with the research, then point it out. Otherwise, you are going to need to learn to STFU, there is nothing else left for you or anyone else when it comes to truth and free speech and being decent by not dehumanizing those whose opinions cause anger (warranted or otherwise).

There is also nothing nefarious, racist, fascist, bigoted, wrong-headed, silly, misguided, or disingenuous about white Anglo or Franco Canadians who know history, and consult with others who also know history, and conclude that the mainstream narrative surrounding Orange Shirts and residential schools doesn’t add up. Debate them, don’t hate them. Don’t call them denialists and try to silence them. Look in the mirror, look inside yourselves Rosie, examine the evidence brought forward which challenges convention. Don’t gaslight, don’t call others denialists, while you deny their evidence, arguments and humanity.

Turning to Professor Frances Widdowson who was recently assaulted while trying to discuss the veracity of the Kamloops claim with students and the public at the University of Winnipeg. Thankfully many reels of video footage were captured so the extent of the breakdown of civilization that took place on campus has been well documented. During the chaos the police were called but never came. Disgracefully, one of the activists who assaulted Professor Widdowson was later seen smiling with Manitoba Premier Wab Kinew. There had been calls on social media for Kinew to apologize to Professor Widdowson for what happened at the University of Winnipeg, however, the photo below illustrates an apology from Kinew is unlikely, as is one from the Chief of the Winnipeg police.

To echo the words of Professor Widdowson, “Wake Up” people. Canada is really going through it. It is obvious where the source of the division and animosity is coming from. Obvious, that is, to anyone not yet riddled with the guilt-virus of Truth and Reconciliation or manipulative tear-jerking Orange Shirt and Red Dress propaganda. The source of all of this nonsense is the Left and everything that is Leftism, including everything that concerns Orange shirts and (un)Truth and Reconciliation.

To be clear, what is dividing Canadians operates under the broad banner of social justice. It is a Leftist social revolution that is upending social cohesion. Where aboriginal issues are concerned, we see it in Land Acknowledgements and “Land Back,” the illiberal Universal Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous People (or DRIPA as it is expressed in B.C. law), Gladue Sentencing guidelines (giving lesser sentences to aboriginal criminals because they are aboriginal), aboriginal gangs and repeat offenders out on bail, unending aboriginal dependence, misappropriation of Canadian taxpayer funds by the billions to service unsustainable, totally dependent, isolated, often dangerous aboriginal reserves, and so much more.

Hearing over and over again about historical wrongs committed by European land-thieving settlers against peaceful, honest, blameless aboriginals, is enough to drive any Canadian who isn’t a historically illiterate unprincipled twit up the wall. Why is there never any thanks extended for the benefits of civilization? Every single aboriginal person in Canada benefits from Western civilization, yet I have never heard a word of awe expressed by an aboriginal about the achievements of the West, or about how aboriginals now live much longer, more fruitful, and peaceful lives then they ever did before contact with Europeans. They no longer get hacked to death by warring tribes, they no longer die from communicable diseases with no vaccines, they no longer starve. There is little appreciation shown for what Westerners have done to lift them out of forms of suffering associated with primitive cultures. And there is no appreciation of the achievement of Western civilization, and never a good or positive word spoken about how aboriginals have benefited from it.

It’s all blame and resentment. The onus is entirely on the side of the non-aboriginals — the “settlers” who pays the bills for a dependent aboriginal population— to adjust, appease, reconcile and accommodate. There is never any talk of aboriginal responsibility. Aboriginals are not blamed for anything, their present circumstances are entirely the fault of the other. What a sad and twisted state of affairs, one that is sure to keep aboriginals dependent, despairing, angry at the majority of Canadians, marginalized, and disconnected from the modern world. Just keep feeding them Truth and Reconciliation agit-prop, and donning the ridiculous orange shirts, and the suffering of the aboriginals, the suffering used by the grifters to extract and misappropriate tax dollars, will perpetuate and expand indefinitely.

A final comment on the lack of political leaders in Canada who criticized Orange Shirt Day. Dallas Brodie as usual has been excellent. She is a force to be reckoned with. She really deserves her own post, so I will wait until then to expand. But in short, she is a warrior who is highly critical of what she calls the “Truth and Reconciliation industry.”

Maxime Bernier, leader of the Peoples Party of Canada, was blunt and honest in his comments regarding Orange Shirt Day. This was not the first time Maxime Bernier has been the soul leader of a federal party to openly criticize the aboriginal industry. He is, quite simply, the only leader of a national party who dares stand up to the dreaded aboriginal lobby. How is that even possible? Canadian conservative leaders across the board have failed the country in this regard. Hopefully some of them will read this, and follow Bernier’s example. This is how it’s done. From X:

On this “National Day for Truth and Reconciliation,” let’s remember that no bodies were found, that the residential schools “genocide” is a hoax, and that reconciliation requires an end to the bs, the victim mentality, the fake white guilt, and the grifting based on it.

Why is that so hard? My best guess is that there are several reasons, lack of principles and cowardice being the big ones. Not surprisingly, Bernier could not escape persecution from the authoritarian Orange Shirts. Assembly of First Nations (AFN) Chief Woodhouse-Nepinak called the cops on him. She wants Bernier arrested for Indian residential school denialism.

I could not approve more of the manner in which Bernier has responded to this obvious attempt to silence his dissenting views. From X:

Chief Woodhouse-Nepinak reacts like typical petty tyrants who think they can use state coercion to shut down political opponents and people they disagree with.

Nothing I wrote can be considered hate crime under current Canadian law — at least until new censorship laws are adopted by the Carney government.

Everything I wrote is true. No bodies were actually found in Kamloops since the 2021 announcement that the remains of 215 “missing children” had been found. There was no genocide.

And does the chief really believe the police can arrest me because I mentioned the bs surrounding this issue, the fake white guilt and the grifting based on it?! Is she against freedom of expression? She’s clearly not fit to be a national leader.

It’s obvious that chief Woodhouse-Nepinak doesn’t care about truth and reconciliation. What she wants is to ban *any* questioning of the narrative that would threaten the flow of billions of tax dollars from Ottawa.”

Bold. Truthful. And correct, especially about the billions of tax dollars. Truth and Reconciliation is a parasitic rent-seeking grift, that is meant to endlessly extract tax-payer funds from the government, while distracting from the very real and serious problems of the poorest and most isolated aboriginal Canadians. From the perspective of those who profit, they have found the perfect grift. The distraction away from the real problems faced by marginalized aboriginals ensures that those problems are never addressed. If they were addressed the source of the grift would disappear.

So suffer on and long, perhaps forever, you most poor and powerless aboriginal people of Canada. Your leaders need bigger mansions and their universities need entirely new buildings constructed for privileged aboriginal students. Not you though, you poor and isolated ones. These mansions and aboriginal student centers are quite lavish and expensive and the neo-tribal elites have big plans to build more of them. You can sit on your reserves, and eek out your simple lives. They will speak often of your suffering at committee meetings where influential decision makers will be so moved as to grant generous bursaries to fuel more construction, orange shirts and Truth and Reconciliation. And of course expenses related to all the things being indigenized will need to be covered. And don’t forget we have unmarked graves to find with our ground penetrating radar machines, all very important and costly work that I’m sure you would agree, or perhaps not, is worth the price of your misery.

Wake up people, civilization in Canada is on the brink of disaster, marginalized aboriginals are left to languish in poverty while others grift off their despair. It is nothing short of third world level corruption and cruelty. Tax payers foot the bill. It’s theft of billions annually from the public purse. Everyone loses except for the grifting rent-seekers of the aboriginal industry. Maxime Bernier and Dallas Brodie cannot be the only Canadian politicians who are getting things right on this. Where are the principled leaders with back-bone and boldness?

I leave you with an image for your nightmares:

Image
Social Justice Indoctrination of children is accomplished in a variety of ways. On Truth and Reconciliation day they all where orange shirts. Also notice the Black Lives Matter and Pride Flags displayed prominently at the front of the indoctrination center. Image via Chanel Pfahl

Woman Who Called Her Assailant A “Faggot” Dragged From Bathtub & Charged By Woke British Cops

Posted on by

International

11 UK cops storm home, drag naked woman from bath— her crime? One text calling her attacker a slur

Merseyside Police defended deploying 11 officers as ‘proportionate’ for public protection

A woman in UK being arrested for a supposed hate crime

A woman in UK being arrested for a supposed hate crimeGrok

Follow Us

Elizabeth Kinney, a 34-year-old single mother of four from Tranmere, Merseyside, was dragged naked from her bathtub last month when 11 police officers – ten men and one woman – burst into her home to arrest her.

Her crime? While recovering in hospital from a fractured skull and serious injuries inflicted by a male acquaintance, Kinney sent private text messages to a former friend that included the word “faggot” to describe her attacker.

The recipient reported the messages as “grossly offensive.”

On 20 November, Kinney pleaded guilty at Sefton Magistrates’ Court to sending a malicious communication aggravated by homophobic hate. She was fined £364, given a community order and forced to apologise in open court.

No charges have been brought against the man who assaulted her. Appearing on Piers Morgan Uncensored, Kinney described the raid as “terrifying and humiliating.”

Merseyside Police defended deploying 11 officers as “proportionate” for public protection.