A revisionist heroine does a great job defending the truth in court
Singer-Songwriter Alison Chabloz arrives at court carrying flowers given to her by her admirers who followed her into the courtroom and sat in the public gallery. (Daily Mail Online)
ALISON CHABLOZ ARRIVED AT WESTMINSTER COURT YESTERDAY, March 7, for the second leg of her trial for expressing views that are called “grossly offensive” because they mock revered Jewish figures like Elie Wiesel and Anne Frank. These views are embedded in songs she wrote and sang, that were uploaded onto the Internet.
Miss Chabloz made several excellent statements under questioning by Prosecutor Karen Robinson. When asked by Robinson whether she denied the holocaust, Chabloz said:
‘Deny the holocaust? I am sorry I do not understand this term. Who can deny the holocaust? It is a term that is meaningless in itself.’
Ms Robinson said: ‘In your police interview you made a distinction between holocaust denial and revisionism.’
Chabloz said: ‘You can call it holocaust denial but I prefer holocaust revisionism.
‘I think there should be an official scientific and forensic investigation. I doubt very much that a murder case would be brought to these courts without forensic investigation.
‘It is impossible to assess that the gas chambers actually existed to kill human beings without evidence. it is impossible to affirm that the supposed murder took place.
‘As the war years continued and got harder for everybody and we see the allied bombing of the German infrastructure – why would they not bomb the concentration camps?
‘A disproportionate amount of blame was put on the Germans by the victors. The victors got to write history.
It’s about furthering the globalist agenda
‘I would say that the so-called holocaust has been used to sustain the criminal state of Israel – it is used as a foundation myth.
‘By sending school children on trips to Auschwitz and inculcating them into believing in the gas chambers, the so-called holocaust is used as a weapon to prevent nationalistic feeling amongst European people.
‘It’s about furthering the globalist agenda.
‘It is certainly a topic worthy of investigation and of intelligent debate and discussion.’
Prosecutor Robinson questioned Chabloz on her police interview where she said, ‘My grandfather certainly didn’t fight for our towns and cities to be taken over by non-whites and non-Christians.’
Chabloz told her, ‘It’s my right to express those views.’
Ms Robinson said: ‘This is not an unqualified right – one cannot send material or matter on the internet which is grossly offensive.’
Chabloz retorted, ‘But it depends for whom doesn’t it, because there are plenty of parodies of Christian music that say Jesus was gay or that he must have been born by a donkey.
‘It is concerning that where I live, my people I love, my race, that we will become an ethnic minority.’
Ms Robinson told her, ‘The views you have expressed are anti-Semitic and racist. You said of the white race, “It breaks my heart to see that disappearing.” That is nothing more than racism.’
Really?! A UK representative of the Court and the legal system says it is racist (wrong) to not want your race to disappear!! Things are worse than I thought.
Loud booing at this remark
At this point there was loud booing from the public gallery and Chabloz’s barrister, Adrian Davies, rose to speak.
‘Now the witness is being treated much as a heretic during the inquisition, she is entitled to any political view that she wishes,’ Mr Davies said.
He believes that the statute is poorly set out (worded). The charges centre on whether embedding the hyperlink to the footage constitutes as sending, and if her songs were grossly offensive.
Chabloz was given bail again until the final submissions on 14 May and a verdict will be given on 25 May.
Category
/arc-anglerfish-tgam-prod-tgam.s3.amazonaws.com/public/MGIALX5RXBCZTO7BFIESYANTMM.JPG)
