Whatcott hit with $104 million lawsuit by sodomite activists

 Whatcott hit with $104 million lawsuit by sodomite activists
The homosexual agenda has never been about “rights”. It traces itself back to the Frankfurt School of Cultural Communists who sought to destroy Western society and pave the way for a new order of mixed race, rootless confused people — easy to manipulate and control. [Interestingly, we see this agenda at work in the fact that the recent Gay Pride parade in Toronto invited as its special guests the radical anti-White Black Lives Matter group, who promptly turned on them, sat down and blocked the parade until a blackmail list of demands were agreed to. Serves the homosexuals right.] A key target has been the family. Two prongs of the attack on the family are radical (mostly Jewish-led) feminism and the homosexual movement, with its ever changing names  —  Gay Pride, Pride, LGBTQ. The homosexual agenda involves suppression and destruction of freedom of speech and all opposition. Notice that the clear intention is the destruction and silencing of the persistent Mr. Whatcott. He uses humour in trying to win over and confront homosexuals. The politically correct are bereft of humour and HATE Whatcott’s zany promotion of Christianity.
 
George Smitherman, a former Liberal provincial politician, cabinet minister and failed mayoralty candidate (2010), makes it quite clear that the goal is to destroy Mr. Whatcott. No “inclusiveness” or “diversity” for Christian believers. Daily XTRA (August 12, 2106) quotes Smitherman as joining the lawsuit as a way  “to stamp this hateful individual out.” The lawsuit seeks, as well, to expose and potentially beggar Whatcott’s supporters:  “The lawsuit seeks in part to determine the identities of those who marched with Whatcott and those who financially supported the political stunt through subpoenaed documents.

‘Those who paid for his airfare or donated Aeroplan miles to get him to Toronto, those who put him up in Toronto, the people who paid to print the pamphlets: anyone who helped him in any way could be on the hook for $100 million dollars.” says [homosexual lawyer Douglas] Elliott, whose firm Cambridge LLP is handling the lawsuit.

 
Christians had better pay attention. The homosexual agenda is totalitarian and intent on silencing its critics. Free speech IS the issue.
 
Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION

Inline image 1

Lawyer Douglas Elliott (left) and former politician George Smitherman at an Ottawa press conference announcing a class action lawsuit against anti-gay activist Bill Whatcott. Claire Wählen/Daily Xtra

I hope this class action lawsuit against me and those who choose to stand with me wakes Christians and others up to the reality of what is happening in the west. As homosexual activism and other libertine and anti-Christian movements gain power in Canada, freedom and truth are dying and those cherished principles are being replaced with falsehood, censorship and tyranny.

I have no intention of divulging the identities of anyone who has chosen to help me. My advice for my Christian friends is be wise and courageous. Pray and do what you can to stand against this tyranny. Also if you sent me some some cash, offered me a bed, or helped make a Gospel condom, keep your mouths shut if these vengeful homosexual activists come snooping. Ask your friends to keep their yaps shut too. If the Ontario courts are corrupt enough to go along with this and if they put me in jail for not cooperating with this witch hunt, just send me the occassional $20 for prison canteen, so I can enjoy some potato chips and continue to write God pleasing commentaries from my jail cell. As much as possible, I don’t want anyone to make it easy for these homosexual activists and lawyers to silence debate or attain any sort of a financial reward at my or my friend’s expense.

Sincerely,
Bill Whatcott

$104-million lawsuit filed against Toronto Pride parade crashers
Bill Whatcott and his ‘gay zombies’ face possible legal injunction
Published on Fri, Aug 12, 2016 8:40 pm.
http://www.dailyxtra.com/toronto/news-a … ers-203986

Prominent gay lawyer Douglas Elliott has filed a $104-million class action lawsuit against anti-gay activist Bill Whatcott for crashing the 2016 Toronto Pride parade.

Elliott is also seeking an injunction from the court to prevent Whatcott and his associates from crashing anymore Pride parades in Canada.

Whatcott and several unidentified allies suited up in neon green body suits and disseminated anti-gay literature at the July 3 Toronto parade, calling themselves “gay zombies.”

The lawsuit seeks in part to determine the identities of those who marched with Whatcott and those who financially supported the political stunt through subpoenaed documents.

“Those who paid for his airfare or donated Aeroplan miles to get him to Toronto, those who put him up in Toronto, the people who paid to print the pamphlets: anyone who helped him in any way could be on the hook for $100 million dollars.” says Elliott, whose firm Cambridge LLP is handling the lawsuit.

Image
Bill Whatcott and his assistants wore green bodysuits to sneak into Toronto’s Pride parade on July 3, 2016.

The two main representatives of the class action suit are well known in the gay community, Christopher Hudspeth, who owns Pegasus Bar in Toronto’s gay village, and former MPP George Smitherman, Ontario’s first openly gay provincial representative and first openly gay cabinet minister.

Both marched in the parade on July 3, 2016 — and in the case of Smitherman have marched in every parade dating back to 1986. Smitherman says he joined the suit to “do all we can to stamp this hateful individual out.”

“Too often, religion is used as the justification for the vilest of homophobia. From my life on the inside of the fundamentalist movement, I know that promoting homophobia is a great way to raise money from other fundamentalists,” explains Hudspeth, who was raised in a fundamentalist Pentecostal home and spoke of the experience at the Aug 12 press conference in Ottawa announcing the lawsuit.

“There is no doubt in my mind that some fundamentalist group, either here or in the United States, is backing these activities. We need to smoke them out.”

As a gay father, Smitherman says he is deeply offended that Whatcott is once again equating homosexuality with pedophilia.

“My outrage and disgust at the duplicitous means by which Whatcott and his so-called zombies will go to to interrupt this place where love is supposed to be safe and to use the most defamatory statements possible, to regurgitate the most untruthful and disgusting stereotypes with respect to gay and lesbian people, means this [lawsuit] is the right thing to do,” Smitherman says.

Image
Toronto Homosexual Pride Parade in the 1970s. Sodomite activist George Smitherman sues Bill Whatcott, accusing him of speaking
falsehoods and stereotypes, yet the Toronto shame parades prove what Bill is saying is true!

“We need to get right to the heart of the matter, which is the financial resources that allow for this disgraceful person to continue his act, which is hurtful to the thousands and thousands that it has impacted.”

When reached by Facebook, Whatcott tells Daily Xtra that he should have been welcomed into the Pride parade, not sued for participating.

“I just read the statement of claim. It seems to me the poor homosexuals are angry at God and the Gospel. They should have welcomed me in their parade as a much needed truth teller and indeed I was far less disruptive than BLM [Black Lives Matter]. Not sure why the homosexual activists aren’t suing them,” Whatcott writes.

Image
Angry at God and the Gospel: A Homosexual in the 2016 Toronto sodomite parade puts Jesus on his crotch and has profanities
directed at Jesus on his behind

If the class action is certified, Elliott says he intends to ask for a summary judgment.

“Where a case is clear cut, there is no point in going through the expense and delay associated with a trial, [so we can] bring a motion to the court for a summary judgment and get it over with, quickly and inexpensively,” Elliott says.

However, they still need to serve Whatcott who, without a permanent address, has been difficult for them to track down, the plaintiffs say.

Whatcott is well known to courts and tribunals in Ontario, Saskatchewan and British Columbia as an anti-gay activist for previous protests, both at parades and on university campuses.

In 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld part of a 2005 Saskatchewan Human Rights Tribunal against Whatcott, for distributing flyers targeting gay and lesbian Canadians.

Before infiltrating the Toronto Pride parade in 2016, Whatcott had similarly faked his identity in 2014 to march along with the Vancouver Pride parade, that time under the disguise of fictitious Calgary Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, to distribute anti-gay leaflets disguised as condoms.

Image
Whatcott disguised as Matthew Davidson, the “gay” high priest of the Calgary Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster giving hugs and
delivering thousands of desperately needed Gospel condoms to homosexuals and their messed up allies, telling them to keep their pants
on and turn their lives over to Jesus so they can have their sins forgiven

Whatcott told Daily Xtra that he and six of his supporters distributed 3,000 flyers at the Toronto Pride parade, including to parade goers, that warned of risks allegedly associated with gay sex.

Image
A Crack Christian Commando from the top secret Christian Truth Activist Gospel Counter Intellegence Unit disguised as a “gay zombie” in a tutu poses with an unsuspecting leatherman at the Toronto Homosexual Shame Parade

The two-page flyer featured graphic photos of anal warts and a dead body described as an “AIDS fatality.” A second page criticizes the “homosexual activism” of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne and former Liberal defence minister Bill Graham.

They, among other Liberals, are being listed as a subclass to the class action suit, as having been targeted by the content of the pamphlets and singled out for their political affiliations. The two main classes of the suit are those marchers who legitimately signed up and marched in the Pride parade, and those who received copies of the flyer at the parade.

—————————————————-

To see the flyers that were distributed at the Toronto homosexual shame parade by the “Gay Zombies” and to stand in solidarity with Bill Whatcott and further distribute these truthful “Zombie Safe Sex” messages before the homosedual activists get them banned download them here!

Front of Flyer
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_Ol-X … sp=sharing

Back of Flyer
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_Ol-X … sp=sharing

GERMAN SURVIVORS OF ALLIED ATROCITIES — A Panel Discussion of Survivors: Charlotte, Helga & Hans With Karin Manion

GERMAN SURVIVORS OF ALLIED ATROCITIES — A Panel Discussion of Survivors: Charlotte, Helga & Hans With Karin Manion
Jews have been remarkably successful, thanks to their significant control over much of the mass media and Hollyweird, telling their tribal stories about World War II — often labeled ‘the holocaust.’ This tribal history, as all such histories are, is entirely self-centered and prone to wild exaggeration. For instance, one of the tenets of the new religion of holocaust is that what happened to the Jews is WW II was the “worst” atrocity in human history. Well, without leaving the 20th century, Stalin exterminated 8-10-million Ukrainians by fame in 1932-33 in the holodomor. Clearly, 8-10-million is greater than the alleged 6-million.  In the greatest ethnic cleansing in human history, 16-million ethnic Germans were expelled from their ancestral homelands in the Sudetenland, East Prussia, Pomerania, Silesia, the lands of the Danube Swabians and others. Three million died or were murdered along the way.
Even dull Canadian high school graduates know that Hitler allegedly killed 6-million Jews, although they might be clueless as to how many Canadians died in WW I (60,000). The time has come to get out from the tyranny of another tribe’s history, no longer adopt it as ours and start telling out own stories.
Now is the time for the German tribe to tell their stories.
Paul Fromm
 
German Survivors of Allied Atrocities

GERMAN SURVIVORS OF ALLIED ATROCITIES.  A panel discussion with three (more) ACTUAL survivors (German) from WWII who suffered the atrocities of the invading Allied powers and lived to tell about it.  [This interview cluster is slightly different from others (a lot of the information is the same as was derived from Karin and Rosemarie’s interviews), so I strove to focus on the 4 presented rather than the background picture/video effects.]

 
Charlotte:  Born in 1936 in East Prussia.  Had to flee from her home in Jan 1945 from the Russians.  Remembers military moving WEST also retreating from the Russians.  Also fled to the Baltic inlet, surviving the Soviet assault on the refugees, attempting to machine gun the ice to drown them as they walked across this frozen inlet.  Headed toward Pomerania, surrounded by the Russians.  
 
Helga:  Danzig, 1932. Escaped twice from the Soviets, head toward Baltic Inlet in the same Danish refugee camp as Karin Manion.
 
Hans:  Volksdeutsch (Ethnic German) born in Transylvania, former Austrian empire (was Hungarian until after WWI) then became Romania.  The town witnessed the fortifications in the East against a possible impending Soviet invasion. Worked in a Labor Camp for the Soviets, also forced labor for AT&T through the Soviets.  Was able to be released from the Labor Camp and escaped to the West, through to Austria.  
 

They migrated to Canada (legally) and made a life for themselves.  As a result of a friend of Karin’s, “Sigi”, these German Volkdeutsch were able to see that the education and propaganda against them was categorically FALSE and have been striving to learn more and share their story.

League
of
Extraordinary
Revisionists
(LOER)
 
COFOUNDERS
Jim Rizoli (LOER)
94 Pond St.
Framingham, MA  01702
***
Diane King
***
Fred Leuchter
If you are interested in helping us defray costs in this effort,
send a check to:
Jim Rizoli (LOER)
94 Pond St.
Framingham, MA  01702
Thank You!

Paul Fromm — Free Speech in Justin Trudeau’s Soft Dictatorship

Paul Fromm — Free Speech in Justin Trudeau’s Soft Dictatorship

The Canada Canadian Association for Free Expression Proudly Presents
 
Paul Fromm
 29:01

Director, Canada First Immigration Reform Committee

Winner of the George Orwell Free Speech Award,

Free Speech in Justin Trudeau’s Soft Dictatorship

· Kicked off Parliament Hill

· YOUR WARD NEWS editor & publisher banned from sending or receiving mail

· Supremos Won’t Hear McCorkill Case (bequests to groups whose views are “contrary to public policy” vulnerable)

· The transgendered and sexually screwed up – yet another group you soon will not be able to criticize.

 

BRIAN RUHE VICTIMIZED AGAIN

I just got this email. Mary approached me a couple of months ago to teach a one hour mindfulness meditation class for $50 at UBC because she met me 10 years ago. This is minor compared to the six jobs I was fired from a year ago.

Brian

——– Forwarded Message ——–

Subject: Re: info
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:57:01 -0700
From: Mary Stern <marziehstern@gmail.com>
To: Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>

brian ruhe

Hi there Brian,

 
I am really sorry to have to tell you that the meditation will be cancelled this Thursday. As a volunteer elected by the community to serve on the association for Acadia park, I have to represent the diverse needs of those how have elected me, and unfortunately, some of those who were interested in coming to meditation are uncomfortable with some of the views on your web site. I apologize for having to cancel, and wish you all the best in continuing your good work. I hope you understand that my group is very culturally diverse, and I need to be accountable to them and support their wellness foremost.
 
Take care and all the best,
 
Sincerely,
 
Mary

Monika Schaefer Denied A Busking Permit Because of Her ‘Non-inclusive” Ideas

Monika Schaefer Denied A Busking Permit Because of Her ‘Non-inclusive” Ideas
 
Don’t worry if you missed the witch hunts of the 17th century, you can catch the same type of intolerant hysteria in Alberta this summer.. Move over, Salem, Massachusetts, there’s a new witch hunting hotbed and that’s Jasper, Alberta.
 
Don’t be fooled by all the politically correct prattle about cherishing “diversity” and “inclusiveness”. That inclusiveness does not extend to diversity of opinion.
 
Back in June environmentalist and violin teacher Monika Schaefer posted a You Tube  —  https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=E0_BZphQ7Qo&feature=youtu.be. apologizing to her parents, now deceased, for having berated them, as a teenager, for not having done something to stop the so-called holocaust. They explained they had not known about it. In 2014, this inquiring, freethinker came to realize that the story hammered into Europeans by 71 years of relentless propaganda was substantially false. The video has gone viral, with over 70,000 hits. However, repression was swift to follow.
 
Miss Schaefer had lobbied town council to permit busking — musicians playing music — saxophone, guitar, banjo, or, in her case, violin — on public sidewalks and inviting contributions from passersby. This Spring council agreed. Hers was the first application and, on July 23, she received a stunning rejection from one Dave Baker, Director of Habitat for the Arts.
 
“We have considered your application for a busking permit in Jasper. In light of your recently publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs we have decided to decline a permit to you at this time….Please see the attached Values and Principles statement.” 
 
One struggles to grasp Baker’s meaning.. Yes, one understands he doesn’t like Monika’s views. But what do her views on WW II have to do with her playing the violin. She has frequently volunteered for benefits and has been a generous and giving member of the Jasper community for 35 years. “Non-inclusive views” — what does that mean? Almost any opinion is non-inclusive: if you support the Blue Jays, you reject the Yankees and the Orioles. If you are pro-Conservative, you reject the Liberals and the NDP. Perhaps, actions may be inclusive. Monika will play for ALL passersby. In fact, she is inclusive.
 

Miss Baker recalls: “As soon as I left the call, I found the offending email in my inbox from the “Habitat for the Arts” in which they told me that because of my “publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs”, they declined my request for a busking license. So my spidy senses from the encounter the day before had been correct. Irony of ironies, not only because I was at the forefront of getting busking to be legal in Jasper, but also because I have been playing my violin in this town for decades, donating my time and music to countless fundraisers, community functions, old-age home, hospital, you name it, I have donated my music to them. Now that I speak in a way that they deem politically incorrect, I cannot go busking, just when it is finally permitted! It is also important to note that I have NEVER used my “violin stage” as a “soap box” to pontificate about political issues. Never. Sometimes I think I should have, but I didn’t.

Parks Canada has been hosting a little music/culture event twice a week open to everybody, tourist and local alike, right downtown in the old  firehall space. A close friend of mine, Marie-Helene is the host. She invited me to participate and so I have been doing that. I was really happy to do it, just to make a point that I am still playing and volunteering, showing my face in public, and of course all the tourists love it. Already last week Marie-Helene told me that Parks had a complaint about me being there and the complainant declared that they should not let me participate. Marie-Helene told me that she had firmly insisted with her boss that she was taking 100% responsibility for me being there, and her boss agreed, they could not stop me from being there. 

Well, today I got the call from the boss, and she told me that a certain person (who remains anonymous) was threatening a protest at the event if I was there, so the boss told me that now it is all about the program, they don’t want to have a spoiled program. I agreed not to attend this week, but I made no promises for future events. I said I needed to think. Again, this is small town, and the stress right now is big.” 

 
Many Canadians, including CAFE fired off e-mails to Mr. Baker urging him to get off the witch-hunt band wagon and reconsider his thought control banning of Monika.
 
Inline image 1
 
However, Baker continues to want to silence Miss Schaefer. She explains:
 

Dear Dave,

Thank you very much for showing me yesterday exactly where you stand on the issue of my busking permit. Before having finally seen you face-to-face for the first time this summer, I had given you the benefit of the doubt. I believed that surely someone else is whispering in your ear, giving you direction. I believed that, because I did not recognize the Dave Baker that I have known since many years, in the curt email which you sent on 23rd July 2016, quoted here:

“We have considered your application for a busking permit in Jasper. In light of your recently publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs we have decided to decline a permit to you at this time….Please see the attached Values and Principles statement.” 

The hostility with which you treated me yesterday, at the “soft opening” of the new library-and-arts facility, gave me quite a clear picture. It became much more obvious to me that it must indeed be you who has made the decision to arbitrarily deny me a busking permit. Your attitude was belligerent and quite frankly, cowardly.

 “You – already – have – the – only – answer – that – you – will – get.” 

Screen Shot 2016-08-07 at 3.31.00 PM

You and I have been generous with each other and with the community in the countless endeavours that we have participated in and shared over the years. Is that all forgotten? It seems you have left your humanity behind.

You have designated yourself judge, jury, prosecutor, and enforcer all at once, on a spurious assumption that I am guilty of a crime, when in fact I am acting in good conscience to rectify past wrongs. My actions are based on my new understanding that the Hollywood version of history we have been taught is indeed full of factual errors.

You made it perfectly clear that answers are not forthcoming to my two questions which I asked in my email of August 1st quoted here:

“There has been a stunning silence from you since the cursory email you sent me on July 23rd, 2016 … I am wondering who you are accountable to, and who the “we” refers to in your (original) message to me. These are two very important questions and I expect that you will be forthcoming with an answer to these…. Monika”

I asked those questions again yesterday, peacefully and in person, and you repeatedly told me “I will not discuss this here, I will not discuss this now. This is a sacred place.” So I asked when and where? When would the answers be coming? Could we set up a meeting please? You then told me point blank “You – already – have – the – only – answer – that – you – will – get.” 

I see… final judgement has been made, and the proverbial jail key has been tossed out.

My first question was about accountability. I received a partial answer from the cover of this week’s Fitzhugh newspaper. The caption under the front-page picture of happy buskers says “Music in the Streets… thanks to a new pilot-project between the municipality and Habitat for the Arts.” For that reason I am sending this to all the town councillors and mayor, as they have a role to play in this. Are they also playing the role of thought police?

The Habitat “Values and Principles” statement is very good. The second paragraph follows (emphases mine), to show the absurdity of your accusation of “non-inclusive beliefs” against me. I contend it is you who is being non-inclusive.

We believe that learning never stops
We know it enhances social inclusion, active citizenship and personal development. 
We embrace new challenges and ideas.
We welcome new methods and change. 
We help each other grow through knowledge exchange and support.

Dave Baker, since you do not want to talk with me, then you simply become part of the wider story. My ‘bcc’ list is growing ever larger, as more and more people from around the world are taking an interest in this story. It is beginning to look like this pretty little town in a National Park and a World Heritage Site is becoming a leader in the totalitarian anti-free-speech direction that Canada is taking.

 

Sincerely,
Monika Schaefer

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REPLY PROVES RCMP SPEARHEADED EFFORT TO SHUT DOWN CAFE MEETING IN VICTORIA

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REPLY PROVES RCMP SPEARHEADED EFFORT TO SHUT DOWN CAFE MEETING IN VICTORIA
 
VICTORIA, British Columbia, August 10, 2016. Political police in Canada? You’d better believe it. Back in June, at the last minute CAFE was called by the very arrogant and abusive manager of the Quality Inn Waddling Dog who announced he was cancelling our meeting scheduled for the next afternoon. This, despite the fact we’d held at least five meetings there, without incident, over the past few years.
 
The manager was rude, ending his conversation with me by denouncing Paul Fromm whom he had called,  as a “racist piece of shit.” [They hadn’t discussed race or ethnicity.]
 
The next day Gordon Watson arrived at the Waddling Dog to see what was happening and to redirect any people who might not know of the new location of our meeting, There he found five (5) members of the Central Saanich Police who ignored the effort of the manager, one Brandon Petraroia to body check him and provoke retaliation. A member of the RCMP also showed up — quite a police presence to shut down a political meeting — in CANADA! not Cuba.
 
Inline image 1
 
 
Two days later Mr. Watson filed a Freedom of Information request with the Saanich Police.
 
Recently he received a heavily redacted response — secrecy’s the name of the game in Canada: can’t let the taxpaying sheoples know too much!
 
It turns out the RCMP Internet snoops learned of the meeting and alerted to Central Saanich Police who approached the hotel manager. Not a believer in free speech in the bunch! This, of course, is political policing and state censorship. There had never been trouble at our meetings; our agenda was entirely non-violent political opinion. Trudeau’s Charter, however flawed, does mumble something about freedom of speech freedom of believe and freedom of assembly. Apparently, the word hadn’t reached the cops in Victoria.
 
Gordon Watson reported:

“I received the reply to my Freedom on Information request, from the Central Saanich police, today [July 25, 2016] in the mail

Quite amusing to guys like me and you

 
 
In their own hard copy, is evidence that the RCMP in Sidney “… had picked up a meeting on social media that was scheduled to take place at the Waddling Dog. … The meeting had appeared via a twitter account named “Canadians Against Mass Immigration”
 
So, THE WADDLING DOG HOTEL WAS APPROACHED BY THE LOCAL POLICE. … after which the manager IMMEDIATELY DECIDED TO CANCEL THE BOOKING !!!
 
So, there you have it : the RCMP taking the initiative to meddle in political activity, telegraphing to a private business that ‘it might not be a good idea to let this guy express his political views‘ (my paraphrase).
 
Out of 19 pages total, in the FoI reply, the last 10 are withheld!”
 
“This matter is not finished,” said Paul Fromm, Director of the Canadian Association for Free Expression.

Eaton’s Centre Censors WiFi – – CAFE Protests

 Eaton’s Centre Censors WiFi – – CAFE Protests

Using the Eaton ‘s Center mall wi fi in Toronto,American Renaissance labelled hateful and racist ,same for VNN

Inline image 1
Many in corporate Canada are only too eager to impose politically correct censorship on their customers. Many Tim Horton’s WiFi outlets are notorious for this. Talk to the managers and say you don’t appreciate their being the thought police.
 
Paul Fromm
Director
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION FOR FREE EXPRESSION

Jim & Joe Rizoli & Diane King Banned from Skeptics Website

Jim & Joe Rizoli & Diane King Banned from Skeptics Website

 

https://youtu.be/78GBs5n_wjE

 

Preview YouTube video Holocaust 101 # 10 with Jim Rizoli

See More

Banned from another Skeptics website…..
YOUTUBE.COM
Strange, you can express skepticism about the moon walk, genetically modified food, chemtrails and God,but the the self-styled skeptics mess their adult diapers if you question the new religion of holocaust foisted upon us to keep us guilty and controllable.

Multiculturalism – A Case of Multiple Personality Disorder

Multiculturalism – A Case of Multiple Personality Disorder

by Rev. Russell Haynes

 

The Gerasene Demoniac by Sebastian Bourdon (1653)


In the fifth chapter of the Gospel of St. Mark we encounter, from the very beginning, a tragic and bizarre story of a man possessed “with an unclean spirit”, who had his “dwelling among the tombs”. It is said that he was “always” wandering about naked, “night and day”, among the “mountains and the tombs, crying and cutting himself with stones”, and where “no man could bind him” nor “could any man tame him”.

And “when he saw Jesus from afar off, he ran and worshipped him, and cried with a loud voice, and said What have I to do with thee, Jesus, thou Son of the most high God? I adjure thee by God that thou torment me not.” And the reason given that the man adjured Jesus not to torment him, was because Jesus had “said unto him, Come out of the man thou unclean spirit”. Moreover, when Jesus asked the man his name he answered “My name is Legion: for we are many”. Accordingly, the man “besought him much that he (Jesus) would not send them (the many) away out of the country”.

At this point in the narrative, we come to learn that there was “nigh unto the mountains a great herd of swine feeding” and that the “devils besought him (Jesus), saying, Send us into the swine that we may enter into them. And forthwith Jesus gave them leave. And the unclean spirits went out, and entered into the swine: and the herd violently ran down a steep place into the sea, (there were about two thousand) and were chocked in the sea.”

Multiculturalism as MPD — A Brief Exegetical and Comparative Analysis

As an ordained Christian minister and research theologian, my area of specialization is theology for psychology and/or psychiatry. Of course, one of the tasks involved in this area of study is the task of integrating Christian theology (or more specifically Biblical psychology) with the rational-empirical psychology of natural science.

In looking at this particular case, found in Mark’s gospel, of a man “who was possessed with the devil and had the legion”, modern day psychiatry would, most likely, diagnose this individual, today, as suffering from Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) or what was previously classified as Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD).

From a Christian-psychological point of view, there are a number of points of contact between the symptomatic or demonized state of this man from Gadara (or Gerasene Demoniac) and the symptomatic or demonized state of a multicultural society. That is, a multicultural society as the personification or embodiment of a national (and demonized) self, possessed by a legion of spirits.

In doing a very basic, exegetical, as well as comparative, analysis, on this specific Marcan text, one of the first things that strikes you is the different movements between the singular and plural. That is, between the use of “spirit” and “spirits” or “devil” and “devils”. We know from the overall context that Jesus addressed and/or dealt with both the “unclean spirit” as well as the “unclean spirits”. The question then becomes one of intended use and harmonization.

In order to harmonize these textual differences, the “unclean spirit” would seem to refer to the collective manifestation and/or collective dynamic of the “unclean spirits”. Thus, instead of casting out the “unclean spirits” individually, since a Roman legion could comprise anywhere from 1000 to 6000 legionaries, Jesus commanded them to leave as a single entity.

And so, or in doing a comparative analysis, just as multiculturalism is a single ideology or a single ideological “spirit”, it too expresses and/or contains within itself a plurality of cultural dynamics or cultural “spirits” as well. Thus it would stand to reason, that once multiculturalism, as a single ideological or “unclean spirit”, is cast out of the body politic, all of the other (or legion of) culturally “unclean spirits” will be cast out together along with it.

A second (and final) observation, which one encounters in this text, is the Gerasene Demoniac’s interchangeable use of the terms “my” and “we”. When Jesus asked the man what his name was, he answered “My name is Legion: for we are many”. Thus, the demonized man had clearly come to understand himself, or rather his individual identity, as an altogether different, confused and tormented plurality – a confused and tormented plurality of mind that, in turn, caused him to inflict harm upon himself.

And so, or likewise, a multicultural society, as the personification or embodiment of a national (and demonized) self, possessed by a legion of multicultural spirits, can only and ultimately understand itself as an altogether different, confused and tormented plurality as well — a confused and tormented plurality of (a national) mind that, in turn, causes it to inflict harm upon itself.

Conclusion

Fortunately, the biblical story does not end there, but rather it ends with the man, “that had been possessed with the devil”, or with the “unclean spirit”, “sitting, and clothed, and in his right mind”, conversing with Jesus, the “son of the most high God”.

And likewise, our story does not need to end tragically as well, but rather it also can end with our national self (a self that had been possessed by a multicultural “devil” or with an “unclean”, multicultural “spirit”) sitting and clothed, and in our right (national) mind, conversing, once again, as a “people” of “the most high God” with Jesus the “son of the most high God”:

Jeremiah 2:13 (KJV)
13 For my people have committed two evils; they have forsaken me the fountain of living waters, and hewed them out cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water.
2 Chronicles 7:14 (KJV)

14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

Authoritarian Jasper Violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom by Attempting to Silence Monika Schaefer’s Violin in Canada’s Jasper National Park by Prof. Tony Hall

Authoritarian Jasper Violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom by Attempting to Silence Monika Schaefer’s Violin in Canada’s Jasper National Park by Prof. Tony Hall

BIGOTSVILLE

Authoritarian Jasper Violates the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom by Attempting to Silence Monika Schaefer’s Violin in Canada’s Jasper National Park 

by Prof. Tony Hall

Screen Shot 2015-11-17 at 10.17.57 AM

To Dave Baker,

I am dumbfounded by the decision you delivered on behalf of some unnamed authority. To Ms. Monika Schaefer you write, “We have considered your application for a busking permit in Jasper. In light of your recently publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs we have decided to decline a permit to you at this time.”

Please clarify who is included in this “we” on whose behalf you claim to speak? Who takes responsibility for the decision to violate core provision of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in the community of Canada’s Jasper National Park?

This unilateral decision extends the so-far-unaccountable decision of those in Jasper’s Canada Day Committee to silence Monika Schaefer’s violin playing last July 1st. Because some Jasperites apparently threatened to disrupt the event, presumably in response to Ms. Schaefer’s peaceful video expression, the precedent was set that Jasper is a place of censorship where freedom of expression and conscience can be subordinated when threats of violence arise.

Now comes this gross violation of fundamental principles of Canadian decency, not to mention the rule of law, as dictated by whatever authority it is on whose behalf you, Dave Baker, claim to be acting in handing down this truly reprehensible arbitration.

Canadians should know that because of the treatment by officialdom of Monika Schaefer, a very active and contributing 35-year citizen of the community you share with her, Jasper should not be considered a safe place suitable for hosting international visitors. From what I have been learning, Jasper seems to be a place where intolerance and arbitrary measures go forward founded on nothing more than the political opinion of unaccountable decision makers.

So far Monika has been dis-invited from her invited Canada Day performance. She has, as reported in The Fitzhugh, been banned from the Jasper Legion No. 31 seemingly on the unilateral say so of Ken Kuzminki. She has been refused by The Fitzhugh newspaper a right of a full response. Her censored full response to the original smear piece against her was considerably shorter than Paul Clarke’s report. Now you and those unnamed individuals for whom you claim to speak have decided to discriminate against Ms. Schaefer because of her beliefs. Characterizing her opinion as “non-inclusive” you have determined she is ineligible for a busking permits to play music in the Jasper town centre.

Your decision is exclusionary as well as discriminatory. The actions taken by you and others are thought to be “justified” on the basis of personal opinions about her video, a 6 minute item that some dislike and many more like. At last count of the 70,000 or so views, over 1400 individuals registered a “like” of the video while almost 600 voted thumbs down.

Given the way Jasper authorities are dealing with this controversy so far, should those that express “like” for the video be banned from Jasper National Park? Should entry into Jasper National Park be conditional on expressing dislike with Ms. Schaefer’s “Sorry Mom” video? Should entrants to the park have to go through screening for political correctness? Should all existing residents be subjected to a thought test like that to which Ms. Schaefer is currently being subjected?

Will the next step be to require Ms. Schaefer to wear some marker, say with a Germany-related symbol, to announce to visitors that she is the punished Jasper citizen whose ideas are so verboten that her violin playing in the streets of Jasper has been prohibited? Will all applicants for a busking permit be subjected to Internet checks to make sure everything they have published is consistent the Values and Principles Statement emanating from the Jasper Community Habitat for the Arts? To do any less would be discriminatory.

I await your indication of who is behind the decision to ban Monika’s beautiful violin playing from the streets of Jasper because she dared speak her mind on a controversial issue that should be treated with nuanced responses rather than with the authoritarian approach that you express in your terse statement to her. How many benefit events in Jasper have been graced by Monika’s legendary violin playing, now transformed into a political football to be thrown around for self-interested political advantage by Jasper’s self-appointed arbiters of community values and tastes.

Yours Sincerely,

Tony Hall
Professor of Liberal Education and Globalization Studies
University of Lethbridge

——————————————
From: Dave Baker <betabake@gmail.com>
Sent: July 23, 2016 11:55:28 AM
To: Monika Schaefer
Subject: RE: Busking Permit

 We have considered your application for a busking permit in Jasper. In light of your recently publicly proclaimed non-inclusive beliefs we have decided to decline a permit to you at this time.

 habitatvaluestatement2 (1)